320 P. Lussier Lussier, P., & Blokland, A. (2014). The adolescence-adulthood transition and Robins’s continuity paradox: Criminal career patterns <strong>of</strong> juvenile and adult sex <strong>of</strong>fenders in a prospective longitudinal birth cohort study. Journal <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice, 42 (2), 153–163. Lussier, P., Blokland, A., Mathesius, J., Pardini, D., & Loeber, R. (2015). The childhood risk factors <strong>of</strong> adolescent-onset and adult-onset <strong>of</strong> sex <strong>of</strong>fending: Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study. In A. Blokland & P. Lussier (Eds.), <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders: A criminal career approach . Oxford: Wiley. Lussier, P., & Cale, J. (2013). Beyond sexual recidivism: A review <strong>of</strong> the sexual criminal career parameters <strong>of</strong> adult sex <strong>of</strong>fenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18 (5), 445–457. Lussier, P., Corrado, R. R., & McCuish, E. (2015). A criminal career study <strong>of</strong> the continuity and discontinuity <strong>of</strong> sex <strong>of</strong>fending during the adolescence-adulthood transition: A prospective longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> incarcerated youth. Justice Quarterly . doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1028966. Lussier, P., & Davies, G. (2011). A person-oriented perspective on sexual <strong>of</strong>fenders, <strong>of</strong>fending trajectories, and risk <strong>of</strong> recidivism: A new challenge for policymakers, risk assessors, and actuarial prediction? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17 (4), 530. Lussier, P., & Gress, C. L. (2014). Community re-entry and the path toward desistance: A quasiexperimental longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> dynamic factors and community risk management <strong>of</strong> adult sex <strong>of</strong>fenders. Journal <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice, 42 (2), 111–122. Lussier, P., Gress, C., Deslauriers-Varin, N., & Amirault, J. (2014). Community risk management <strong>of</strong> high-risk sex <strong>of</strong>fenders in Canada: Findings from a quasi-experimental study. Justice Quarterly, 31 (2), 287–314. Lussier, P., & Healey, J. (2009). Rediscovering Quetelet, again: The “aging” <strong>of</strong>fender and the prediction <strong>of</strong> re<strong>of</strong>fending in a sample <strong>of</strong> adult sex <strong>of</strong>fenders. Justice Quarterly, 26 (4), 827–856. Lussier, P., Tzoumakis, S., Cale, J., & Amirault, J. (2010). Criminal trajectories <strong>of</strong> adult sex <strong>of</strong>fenders and the age effect: Examining the dynamic aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fending in adulthood. International Criminal Justice Review, 20 (2), 147–168. Lussier, P., Van Den Berg, C., Bijleveld, C., & Hendriks, J. (2012). A developmental taxonomy <strong>of</strong> juvenile sex <strong>of</strong>fenders for theory, research, and prevention: The adolescent-limited and the high-rate slow desister. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39 (12), 1559–1581. Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2003 (101), 3–23. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their Lives . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. McCann, K., & Lussier, P. (2008). A meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> the predictors <strong>of</strong> sexual recidivism in juvenile <strong>of</strong>fenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6 , 363–385. McCuish, E., Lussier, P., & Corrado, R. (2015). Criminal careers <strong>of</strong> juvenile sex and nonsex <strong>of</strong>fenders: Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1541204014567541 . M<strong>of</strong>fitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100 (4), 674–701. Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. P. (2009). Trajectories <strong>of</strong> antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45 (6), 1654. Morizot, J., & Le Blanc, M. (2005). Searching for a developmental typology <strong>of</strong> personality and its relations to antisocial behavior: A longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> a representative sample <strong>of</strong> men. Journal <strong>of</strong> Personality, 73 (1), 139–182. Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, L., …, Losoya, S. H. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent <strong>of</strong>fenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice , 2 (3), 213–236. Murphy, L., Brodsky, D., Brakel, J., Petrunik, M., Fedor<strong>of</strong>f, J., & Grudzinskas, A. (2009). Community-based management <strong>of</strong> sex <strong>of</strong>fenders: An examination <strong>of</strong> sex <strong>of</strong>fender registries and community notification in the United States and Canada. In F. M. Saleh, A. J. Grudzinskas, J. M. Bradford, & D. J. Brodsky (Eds.), <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders: Identifi cation, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues (pp. 412–441). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13 Desistance from Crime: Toward an Integrated Conceptualization for Intervention 321 Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling <strong>of</strong> development . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Nakamura, K., & Blumstein, A. (2015). Potential for redemption for sex <strong>of</strong>fenders. In A. Blokland & P. Lussier (Eds.), <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders: A criminal career approach . Oxford: Wiley. Petrunik, M. G. (2002). Managing unacceptable risk: <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders, community response, and social policy in the United States and Canada. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46 (4), 483–511. Petrunik, M. (2003). The hare and the tortoise: Dangerousness and sex <strong>of</strong>fender policy in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45 (1), 43–72. Piliavin, I., Gartner, R., Thornton, C., & Matsueda, R. L. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 101–119 . Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. Crime and Justice, 359–506 . Piquero, A. R., & M<strong>of</strong>fitt, T. E. (2005). Explaining the facts <strong>of</strong> crime: How the developmental taxonomy replies to Farrington’s invitation. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Integrated developmental & life-course theories <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fending: Advances in criminological theory (pp. 51–72). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. Pogarsky, G., & Piquero, A. R. (2003). Can punishment encourage <strong>of</strong>fending? Investigating the “resetting” effect. Journal <strong>of</strong> Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40 (1), 95–120. Prentky, R. A., & Lee, A. F. (2007). Effect <strong>of</strong> age-at-release on long term sexual re-<strong>of</strong>fense rates in civilly committed sexual <strong>of</strong>fenders. <strong>Sex</strong>ual Abuse: A Journal <strong>of</strong> Research and <strong>Treatment</strong>, 19 (1), 43–59. Proulx, J., & Lussier, P. (2001). La prédiction de la récidive chez les agresseurs sexuels. Criminologie, 34 , 9–29. Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent <strong>of</strong>fenders: Appraising and managing risk . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Actuarial prediction <strong>of</strong> sexual recidivism. Journal <strong>of</strong> Interpersonal Violence, 10 (1), 85–105. Robbé, M. D. V., Mann, R. E., Maruna, S., & Thornton, D. (2014). An exploration <strong>of</strong> protective factors supporting desistance from sexual <strong>of</strong>fending. <strong>Sex</strong>ual Abuse: A Journal <strong>of</strong> Research and <strong>Treatment</strong>, 27 (1), 16–33. Rosenfeld, R., White, H., & Esbensen, F. (2012). Special categories <strong>of</strong> serious and violent <strong>of</strong>fenders: Drug dealers, gang members, homicide <strong>of</strong>fenders, and sex <strong>of</strong>fenders. From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy, and prevention (pp. 118–149). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Sample, L. L., & Bray, T. M. (2003). Are sex <strong>of</strong>fenders dangerous? Criminology & Public Policy, 3 (1), 59–82. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1995). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life‐course desisters? Trajectories <strong>of</strong> crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41 (3), 555–592. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A life-course view <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> crime. The Annals <strong>of</strong> the American Academy <strong>of</strong> Political and Social Science, 602 (1), 12–45. Shover, N., & Henderson, B. (1995). Repressive crime control and male persistent thieves. In H. Barlow (Ed.), Crime and public policy . Oxford: Westview Press. Shover, N., & Thompson, C. Y. (1992). Age, differential expectations, and crime desistance. Criminology, 30 (1), 89–104. Simon, J. (1998). Managing the monstrous: <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders and the new penology. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4 (1–2), 452. Soothill, K., Fitzpatrick, C., & Francis, B. (2013). Understanding criminal careers . London: Routledge. Steinberg, L. (2010). A behavioral scientist looks at science <strong>of</strong> adolescent brain development. Brain and Cognition, 72 , 160–164.
- Page 1 and 2:
D. Richard Laws · William O'Donohu
- Page 4 and 5:
D. Richard Laws • William O’Don
- Page 6 and 7:
Pref ace It can be wise for a field
- Page 8 and 9:
Contents 1 Problems in the Classifi
- Page 10 and 11:
Contributors Adam J. Carter , Ph.D.
- Page 12 and 13:
Chapter 1 Problems in the Classific
- Page 14 and 15:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 16 and 17:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 18 and 19:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 20 and 21:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 22 and 23:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 24 and 25:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 26 and 27:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 28 and 29:
1 Problems in the Classification an
- Page 30 and 31:
20 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger O
- Page 32 and 33:
Table 2.1 Glueck and Glueck’s ( 1
- Page 34 and 35:
24 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger w
- Page 36 and 37:
26 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger L
- Page 38 and 39:
28 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger T
- Page 40 and 41:
30 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger T
- Page 42 and 43:
32 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger b
- Page 44 and 45:
34 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger (
- Page 46 and 47:
36 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger r
- Page 48 and 49:
38 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger v
- Page 50 and 51:
40 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger C
- Page 52 and 53:
42 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger H
- Page 54 and 55:
44 L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger T
- Page 56 and 57:
46 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. at reducin
- Page 58 and 59:
48 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Certain pa
- Page 60 and 61:
50 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. these cons
- Page 62 and 63:
52 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. to other m
- Page 64 and 65:
54 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Developing
- Page 66 and 67:
56 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. ( d = 0.67
- Page 68 and 69:
58 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. justified
- Page 70 and 71:
60 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. (any convi
- Page 72 and 73:
62 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. press ) fo
- Page 74 and 75:
64 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Importantl
- Page 76 and 77:
66 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. United Sta
- Page 78 and 79:
68 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. offenders
- Page 80 and 81:
70 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. A good def
- Page 82 and 83:
72 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Conclusion
- Page 84 and 85:
74 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Babchishin
- Page 86 and 87:
76 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Grove, W.
- Page 88 and 89:
78 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Hilton, N.
- Page 90 and 91:
80 R.J.B. Lehmann et al. Pedneault,
- Page 92 and 93:
Chapter 4 Risk Formulation: The New
- Page 94 and 95:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 96 and 97:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 98 and 99:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 100 and 101:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 102 and 103:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 104 and 105:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 106 and 107:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 108 and 109:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 110 and 111:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 112 and 113:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 114 and 115:
4 Risk Formulation: The New Frontie
- Page 116 and 117:
108 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Conv
- Page 118 and 119:
110 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Circ
- Page 120 and 121:
112 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Visu
- Page 122 and 123:
114 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner gyne
- Page 124 and 125:
116 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner View
- Page 126 and 127:
118 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner comp
- Page 128 and 129:
120 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner stim
- Page 130 and 131:
122 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner sign
- Page 132 and 133:
124 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner In t
- Page 134 and 135:
126 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner sexu
- Page 136 and 137:
128 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner Babc
- Page 138 and 139:
130 R.J. Wilson and M.H. Miner King
- Page 140 and 141:
Chapter 6 Polygraph Testing of Sex
- Page 142 and 143:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 144 and 145:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 146 and 147:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 148 and 149:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 150 and 151:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 152 and 153:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 154 and 155:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 156 and 157:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 158 and 159:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 160 and 161:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 162 and 163:
6 Polygraph Testing of Sex Offender
- Page 164 and 165:
Chapter 7 The Strengths of Treatmen
- Page 166 and 167:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 168 and 169:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 170 and 171:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 172 and 173:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 174 and 175:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 176 and 177:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 178 and 179:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 180 and 181:
7 The Strengths of Treatment for Se
- Page 182 and 183:
Chapter 8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk
- Page 184 and 185:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
- Page 186 and 187:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
- Page 188 and 189:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
- Page 190 and 191:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
- Page 192 and 193:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
- Page 194 and 195:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
- Page 196 and 197:
8 Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors
- Page 198 and 199:
Chapter 9 Early Detection and Inter
- Page 200 and 201:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 202 and 203:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 204 and 205:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 206 and 207:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 208 and 209:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 210 and 211:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 212 and 213:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 214 and 215:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 216 and 217:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 218 and 219:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 220 and 221:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 222 and 223:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 224 and 225:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 226 and 227:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 228 and 229:
9 Early Detection and Intervention
- Page 230 and 231:
Chapter 10 Community Control of Sex
- Page 232 and 233:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 234 and 235:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 236 and 237:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 238 and 239:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 240 and 241:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 242 and 243:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 244 and 245:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 246 and 247:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 248 and 249:
10 Community Control of Sex Offende
- Page 250 and 251:
244 K.N. Daly SVP laws were passed
- Page 252 and 253:
246 K.N. Daly 750. 338 b. The condu
- Page 254 and 255:
248 K.N. Daly had largely been a re
- Page 256 and 257:
250 K.N. Daly By contrast successfu
- Page 258 and 259:
252 K.N. Daly In reaching his concu
- Page 260 and 261:
254 K.N. Daly with no accompanying
- Page 262 and 263:
256 K.N. Daly legal significance of
- Page 264 and 265:
258 K.N. Daly law which has caused
- Page 266 and 267:
Chapter 12 The Shortcomings of Sexu
- Page 268 and 269:
12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 270 and 271:
12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 272 and 273:
12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 274 and 275: 12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 276 and 277: 12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 278 and 279: 12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 280 and 281: 12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 282 and 283: 12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 284 and 285: 12 The Shortcomings of Sexual Offen
- Page 286 and 287: 282 P. Lussier practitioners have r
- Page 288 and 289: 284 P. Lussier refers to someone vo
- Page 290 and 291: 286 P. Lussier Morton, & Harris, 20
- Page 292 and 293: 288 P. Lussier The authors compared
- Page 294 and 295: 290 P. Lussier relatively stable ch
- Page 296 and 297: 292 P. Lussier Offending Trajectori
- Page 298 and 299: 294 P. Lussier impact or a limited
- Page 300 and 301: 296 P. Lussier especially those han
- Page 302 and 303: 298 P. Lussier the role of social f
- Page 304 and 305: 300 P. Lussier Mulvey, 2009 ). In f
- Page 306 and 307: 302 P. Lussier opportunities and re
- Page 308 and 309: 304 P. Lussier Peer Influence While
- Page 310 and 311: 306 P. Lussier of offending. For ex
- Page 312 and 313: 308 P. Lussier Aging, self-identity
- Page 314 and 315: 310 P. Lussier & Rice, 2007 ; Lussi
- Page 316 and 317: 312 P. Lussier Individual and Socia
- Page 318 and 319: 314 P. Lussier als subject to incre
- Page 320 and 321: 316 P. Lussier opportunities extent
- Page 322 and 323: 318 P. Lussier Corrado, R. R., Cohe
- Page 326 and 327: 322 P. Lussier Stouthamer-Loeber, M
- Page 328 and 329: 324 J. Tabachnick et al. community
- Page 330 and 331: 326 J. Tabachnick et al. Fig. 14.1
- Page 332 and 333: 328 J. Tabachnick et al. The Need f
- Page 334 and 335: 330 J. Tabachnick et al. The CDC de
- Page 336 and 337: 332 J. Tabachnick et al. Practical
- Page 338 and 339: 334 J. Tabachnick et al. (e.g., tru
- Page 340 and 341: 336 J. Tabachnick et al. Unfortunat
- Page 342 and 343: 338 J. Tabachnick et al. Banyard, V
- Page 344 and 345: 340 J. Tabachnick et al. Humphries,
- Page 346 and 347: 342 J. Tabachnick et al. Tharp, A.
- Page 348 and 349: 344 Index Adolescent sexually abusi
- Page 350 and 351: 346 Index Offense-supportive attitu
- Page 352: 348 Index Structured assessment of