ROBOTICS CLUSTER

Recommendations

Info

13.2. NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY LABORATORIES/WORKING GROUPS Brown University (Providence, RI) • Center for Vision Research http://cvr.brown.edu/aboutcvr.html • Humans to Robots Laboratory http://h2r.cs.brown.edu University of Connecticut (Storrs, CT) • Advanced Laboratory for Automation, Robotics, and Manufacturing (ALARM) www.engr.uconn.edu/alarm University of Rhode Island (Kingston, RI) • Robotics Laboratory for Complex Underwater Environments (R CUE) http://wiki.egr.uri.edu/mediawiki/index.php/R_CUE Yale University (New Haven, CT) • Grab Lab www.eng.yale.edu/grablab www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSETTS ROBOTICS CLUSTER 96
14. APPENDIX D: WAGES FOR ROBOTICS ENGINEERS 14.1. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS* Massachusetts and United States Annual Mean Wage Versus Mass Robotics Cluster Versus U.S. Massachusetts US$103,660 -0.2% 8.2% United States US$95,780 -7.8% N/A Mass Robotics Cluster Areas Annual Mean Wage Versus U.S. Boston-Cambridge-Quincy US$104,480 9.1% Barnstable Town US$85,960 -10.3% Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton US$97,790 2.1% Framingham US$109,560 14.4% Haverhill-North Andover-Amesbury US$88,470 -7.6% Lawrence-Methuen-Salem US$93,380 -2.5% Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford US$102,560 7.1% New Bedford US$106,200 10.9% Peabody US$96,570 0.8% Taunton-Norton-Raynham US$105,720 10.4% Worcester US$94,420 -1.4% Weighted Mean = US$103,827 Top Paying U.S. States Annual Mean Wage Versus Massachusetts Versus U.S. California US$114,730 10.7% 19.8% Alaska US$111,540 7.6% 16.5% Massachusetts US$103,660 0.0% 8.2% District of Columbia US$103,260 -0.4% 7.8% Washington US$102,750 -0.9% 7.3% Top U.S. Metropolitan Area Annual Mean Wage Versus Mass Robotics Cluster Versus U.S. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara US$128,220 23.5% 33.9% Fresno US$117,880 13.5% 23.1% San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City US$117,620 13.3% 22.8% Stockton US$117,140 12.8% 22.3% Wilmington, NC US$116,300 12.0% 21.4% (* Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics) www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSETTS ROBOTICS CLUSTER 97
Page 1 and 2:
www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSET
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONTRIBUTORS..
Page 5 and 6:
6.8.3.3. Research and Investment...
Page 7 and 8:
9. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ME
Page 9 and 10:
1. CONTRIBUTORS ABI Research would
Page 11 and 12:
2.4. MASSACHUSETTS COLLABORATIVE RO
Page 13 and 14:
• Universities and Labs: Massachu
Page 15 and 16:
3. INTRODUCTION Although substantia
Page 17 and 18:
4. ROBOTS AND ROBOTICS TECHNOLOGIES
Page 19 and 20:
5. ROBOTICS AS AN INNOVATION DRIVER
Page 21 and 22:
6. THE GLOBAL ROBOTICS AND INTELLIG
Page 23 and 24:
6.2. INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS The defini
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 3: Drivers for Industrial Ro
Page 27 and 28:
Company Spotlight: Soft Robotics So
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 6: The Healthcare Robotics S
Page 31 and 32:
• Increased Expectations: With th
Page 33 and 34:
Table 4: Representative Massachuset
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 8: Projected U.S. DoD Unmann
Page 37 and 38:
Key Market: Small Unmanned Ground V
Page 39 and 40:
Field robotics initiatives are ofte
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 9: Total Worldwide Commercia
Page 43 and 44:
• Linear Robots: Also called gant
Page 45 and 46:
Company Spotlight: Logistics System
Page 47 and 48:
6.5.1. Strong Growth In 2015, the c
Page 49 and 50:
Company Spotlight: Consumer Systems
Page 51 and 52:
Massachusetts Spotlight: New Englan
Page 53 and 54: 6.7.1.3. Massachusetts Leads In 201
Page 55 and 56: the end effectors was preprogrammed
Page 57 and 58: type of robotic UGV, and why autono
Page 59 and 60: Error-free, real-time mapping, navi
Page 61 and 62: Robotic edge products are fundament
Page 63 and 64: ROS usage among robotics researcher
Page 65 and 66: • Primary Robotics Cluster: The f
Page 67 and 68: The number and range of companies i
Page 69 and 70: 7.4. SALARIES FOR ROBOTICS ENGINEER
Page 71 and 72: Figure 23: Worldwide VC and Private
Page 73 and 74: Figure 25: 2015 Global Robotics Inv
Page 75 and 76: Global private investment trends fo
Page 77 and 78: Notable hardware accelerators that
Page 79 and 80: carrying out investigations into ot
Page 81 and 82: The National Security Engineering C
Page 83 and 84: 8. GUIDANCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS If
Page 85 and 86: Massachusetts robotics companies se
Page 87 and 88: 8.2.8. Offer Low-cost Loans for Dev
Page 89 and 90: 8.4.1. Strengthen Cluster Ties The
Page 91 and 92: 9. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ME
Page 93 and 94: 9.1.5. Simplify, Limit, and Standar
Page 95 and 96: Figure 31: The Implementation Metho
Page 97 and 98: programs from other internships is
Page 99 and 100: Massachusetts Technology Leadership
Page 101 and 102: 12. APPENDIX B: LIST OF TABLES Tabl
Page 103: http://lis.csail.mit.edu/new/resear
Page 107 and 108: 14.3. SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, SYSTEMS
Page 109 and 110: 14.5. COMPUTER HARDWARE ENGINEERS*
Page 111 and 112: CONSUMER Consumer - Home Care/Lawn
Page 113 and 114: 17. APPENDIX G: ACRONYMS USED IN TH
Page 115 and 116: sUGV SW TRI UAS UGS UGV UMS UNCTAD
Page 117 and 118: Endeavor Robotics Bedford www.endea
Page 119 and 120: www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSET
Page 121 and 122: Geartronics Industries 100 Chelmsfo
Page 123: Published October 18, 2016 ©2016 A
show all

ROBOTICS CLUSTER

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?