ROBOTICS CLUSTER

Recommendations

Info

14.4. SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, APPLICATIONS* Massachusetts and United States Annual Mean Wage Versus Mass Robotics Cluster Versus U.S. Massachusetts US$109,670 -0.8% 10.2% United States US$99,530 -10.0% N/A Mass Robotics Cluster Areas Annual Mean Wage Versus U.S. Boston-Cambridge-Quincy US$112,630 13.2% Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton US$88,880 -10.7% Framingham US$100,610 1.1% Haverhill-North Andover-Amesbury US$100,900 1.4% Lawrence-Methuen-Salem US$108,090 8.6% Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford US$109,230 9.7% Peabody US$83,790 -15.8% Taunton-Norton-Raynham US$99,230 -0.3% Worcester US$104,600 5.1% Weighted Mean = US$110,562 Top Paying U.S. States Annual Mean Wage Versus Massachusetts Versus U.S. California US$119,970 9.4% 20.5% Washington US$115,370 5.2% 15.9% Massachusetts US$109,670 0.0% 10.2% Maryland US$108,300 -1.2% 8.8% New York US$107,020 -2.4% 7.5% Top Paying U.S. Metropolitan Areas Annual Mean Wage Versus Mass Robotics Cluster Versus U.S. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara US$142,370 28.8% 43.0% Oakland-Fremont-Hayward US$121,200 9.6% 21.8% San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City US$117,610 6.4% 18.2% Seattle-Bellevue-Everett US$117,460 6.2% 18.0% Baltimore-Towson US$114,350 3.4% 14.9% (* Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics) www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSETTS ROBOTICS CLUSTER 100
14.5. COMPUTER HARDWARE ENGINEERS* Massachusetts and United States Annual Mean Wage versus Mass Robotics Cluster Versus U.S. Massachusetts US$115,620 -0.6% 4.5% United States US$110,650 -4.8% 0.0% Mass Robotics Cluster Areas Annual Mean Wage Versus U.S. Boston-Cambridge-Quincy US$115,660 4.5% Framingham US$114,740 3.7% Lawrence-Methuen-Salem US$105,750 -4.4% Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford US$124,290 12.3% Worcester US$125,540 13.5% Weighted Mean = US$116,283 Top Paying U.S. States Annual Mean Wage versus Massachusetts Versus U.S. California US$123,270 6.6% 11.4% Maryland US$117,730 1.8% 6.4% Virginia US$116,240 0.5% 5.1% Massachusetts US$115,620 0.0% 4.5% District of Columbia US$113,940 -1.5% 3.0% Top Paying U.S. Metropolitan Areas Annual Mean Wage versus Mass Robotics Cluster Versus U.S. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara US$136,220 17.1% 23.1% San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City US$130,470 12.2% 17.9% Worcester US$125,540 8.0% 13.5% Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford US$124,290 6.9% 12.3% Baltimore-Towson US$123,020 5.8% 11.2% * Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSETTS ROBOTICS CLUSTER 101
Page 1 and 2:
www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSET
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONTRIBUTORS..
Page 5 and 6:
6.8.3.3. Research and Investment...
Page 7 and 8:
9. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ME
Page 9 and 10:
1. CONTRIBUTORS ABI Research would
Page 11 and 12:
2.4. MASSACHUSETTS COLLABORATIVE RO
Page 13 and 14:
• Universities and Labs: Massachu
Page 15 and 16:
3. INTRODUCTION Although substantia
Page 17 and 18:
4. ROBOTS AND ROBOTICS TECHNOLOGIES
Page 19 and 20:
5. ROBOTICS AS AN INNOVATION DRIVER
Page 21 and 22:
6. THE GLOBAL ROBOTICS AND INTELLIG
Page 23 and 24:
6.2. INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS The defini
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 3: Drivers for Industrial Ro
Page 27 and 28:
Company Spotlight: Soft Robotics So
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 6: The Healthcare Robotics S
Page 31 and 32:
• Increased Expectations: With th
Page 33 and 34:
Table 4: Representative Massachuset
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 8: Projected U.S. DoD Unmann
Page 37 and 38:
Key Market: Small Unmanned Ground V
Page 39 and 40:
Field robotics initiatives are ofte
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 9: Total Worldwide Commercia
Page 43 and 44:
• Linear Robots: Also called gant
Page 45 and 46:
Company Spotlight: Logistics System
Page 47 and 48:
6.5.1. Strong Growth In 2015, the c
Page 49 and 50:
Company Spotlight: Consumer Systems
Page 51 and 52:
Massachusetts Spotlight: New Englan
Page 53 and 54:
6.7.1.3. Massachusetts Leads In 201
Page 55 and 56:
the end effectors was preprogrammed
Page 57 and 58: type of robotic UGV, and why autono
Page 59 and 60: Error-free, real-time mapping, navi
Page 61 and 62: Robotic edge products are fundament
Page 63 and 64: ROS usage among robotics researcher
Page 65 and 66: • Primary Robotics Cluster: The f
Page 67 and 68: The number and range of companies i
Page 69 and 70: 7.4. SALARIES FOR ROBOTICS ENGINEER
Page 71 and 72: Figure 23: Worldwide VC and Private
Page 73 and 74: Figure 25: 2015 Global Robotics Inv
Page 75 and 76: Global private investment trends fo
Page 77 and 78: Notable hardware accelerators that
Page 79 and 80: carrying out investigations into ot
Page 81 and 82: The National Security Engineering C
Page 83 and 84: 8. GUIDANCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS If
Page 85 and 86: Massachusetts robotics companies se
Page 87 and 88: 8.2.8. Offer Low-cost Loans for Dev
Page 89 and 90: 8.4.1. Strengthen Cluster Ties The
Page 91 and 92: 9. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ME
Page 93 and 94: 9.1.5. Simplify, Limit, and Standar
Page 95 and 96: Figure 31: The Implementation Metho
Page 97 and 98: programs from other internships is
Page 99 and 100: Massachusetts Technology Leadership
Page 101 and 102: 12. APPENDIX B: LIST OF TABLES Tabl
Page 103 and 104: http://lis.csail.mit.edu/new/resear
Page 105 and 106: 14. APPENDIX D: WAGES FOR ROBOTICS
Page 107: 14.3. SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, SYSTEMS
Page 111 and 112: CONSUMER Consumer - Home Care/Lawn
Page 113 and 114: 17. APPENDIX G: ACRONYMS USED IN TH
Page 115 and 116: sUGV SW TRI UAS UGS UGV UMS UNCTAD
Page 117 and 118: Endeavor Robotics Bedford www.endea
Page 119 and 120: www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSET
Page 121 and 122: Geartronics Industries 100 Chelmsfo
Page 123: Published October 18, 2016 ©2016 A
show all

ROBOTICS CLUSTER

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?