ROBOTICS CLUSTER

Recommendations

Info

7.10. NATIONAL LABORATORIES............................................................................................72 7.11. MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY INSTALLATIONS..............................................................73 7.11.1. U.S. Army Natick Soldier Systems Center............................................................ 73 7.11.2. Joint Base Cape Cod................................................................................................. 73 7.11.3. Fort Devens................................................................................................................ 74 7.11.3.1. Devens Interoperability Playground.......................................74 8. GUIDANCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................75 8.1. MASSACHUSETTS ROBOTICS CLUSTER........................................................................75 8.2. CLUSTER STRATEGIES...................................................................................................76 8.2.1. Talent Development................................................................................................. 76 8.2.2. Encourage Entrepreneurship as a Part of STEM Education............................. 76 8.2.3. Expand Internship and Co-op Opportunities..................................................... 76 8.2.4. Develop Workforce Training and Retraining Initiatives.................................... 77 8.2.5. Technology Implementation: Facilitate Development, Testing, and Validation.................................................................................................................... 77 8.2.6. Ensure Sustained Accelerator and Incubator Activity........................................ 78 8.2.7. Ensure Continued Support for Testing Centers.................................................. 78 8.2.8. Offer Low-cost Loans for Development, Prototyping, and Testing Tools...... 79 8.2.9. Leverage State Procurement for Validation........................................................ 79 8.2.10. Maintain a Simple, Stable Regulatory Environment......................................... 79 8.3. BRAND BUILDING: BRAND AND MARKET THE CLUSTER.............................................79 8.4. STRENGTHEN AND ENHANCE CLUSTER DYNAMICS...................................................80 8.4.1. Strengthen Cluster Ties............................................................................................ 81 8.4.2. Increase Local Demand........................................................................................... 81 8.4.3. Strategically Support Nascent and Emerging Submarkets............................... 81 8.4.4. Support New Business Formation........................................................................ 81 www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSETTS ROBOTICS CLUSTER V
9. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGY................................ 83 9.1. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY......................................................................................83 9.1.1. Develop a Commercial Class Database................................................................ 84 9.1.2. Formally Define Cluster Members........................................................................ 84 9.1.3. Utilize a Modernized Taxonomic Framework..................................................... 84 9.1.4. Standardize Company Descriptors........................................................................ 84 9.1.5. Simplify, Limit, and Standardize Cluster Indicators........................................... 85 9.2. THE IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGY....................................................................86 9.2.1. Phase 1: Develop the Tools..................................................................................... 87 9.2.2. Phase 2: Implement Recommendations.............................................................. 87 9.2.3. Phase 3: Measure and Assess Performance....................................................... 88 9.2.4. Phase 4: Gauge Effectiveness................................................................................. 88 9.2.5. Phase 5: Report and Evaluation............................................................................. 89 9.2.6. Phase 6: Iterate the Process................................................................................... 89 10. REFERENCES...................................................................................................... 90 11. APPENDIX A: LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................92 12. APPENDIX B: LIST OF TABLES......................................................................... 93 13. APPENDIX C: RESEARCH LABORATORIES......................................................94 13.1. MASSACHUSETTS UNIVERSITY RESEARCH LABORATORIES.........................................94 13.2. NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY LABORATORIES/WORKING GROUPS............................96 14. APPENDIX D: WAGES FOR ROBOTICS ENGINEERS.......................................97 14.1. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS*.............................................................................................97 14.2. MECHANICAL ENGINEERS*..........................................................................................98 www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSETTS ROBOTICS CLUSTER VI
Page 1 and 2: www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSET
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONTRIBUTORS..
Page 5: 6.8.3.3. Research and Investment...
Page 9 and 10: 1. CONTRIBUTORS ABI Research would
Page 11 and 12: 2.4. MASSACHUSETTS COLLABORATIVE RO
Page 13 and 14: • Universities and Labs: Massachu
Page 15 and 16: 3. INTRODUCTION Although substantia
Page 17 and 18: 4. ROBOTS AND ROBOTICS TECHNOLOGIES
Page 19 and 20: 5. ROBOTICS AS AN INNOVATION DRIVER
Page 21 and 22: 6. THE GLOBAL ROBOTICS AND INTELLIG
Page 23 and 24: 6.2. INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS The defini
Page 25 and 26: Figure 3: Drivers for Industrial Ro
Page 27 and 28: Company Spotlight: Soft Robotics So
Page 29 and 30: Figure 6: The Healthcare Robotics S
Page 31 and 32: • Increased Expectations: With th
Page 33 and 34: Table 4: Representative Massachuset
Page 35 and 36: Figure 8: Projected U.S. DoD Unmann
Page 37 and 38: Key Market: Small Unmanned Ground V
Page 39 and 40: Field robotics initiatives are ofte
Page 41 and 42: Figure 9: Total Worldwide Commercia
Page 43 and 44: • Linear Robots: Also called gant
Page 45 and 46: Company Spotlight: Logistics System
Page 47 and 48: 6.5.1. Strong Growth In 2015, the c
Page 49 and 50: Company Spotlight: Consumer Systems
Page 51 and 52: Massachusetts Spotlight: New Englan
Page 53 and 54: 6.7.1.3. Massachusetts Leads In 201
Page 55 and 56: the end effectors was preprogrammed
Page 57 and 58:
type of robotic UGV, and why autono
Page 59 and 60:
Error-free, real-time mapping, navi
Page 61 and 62:
Robotic edge products are fundament
Page 63 and 64:
ROS usage among robotics researcher
Page 65 and 66:
• Primary Robotics Cluster: The f
Page 67 and 68:
The number and range of companies i
Page 69 and 70:
7.4. SALARIES FOR ROBOTICS ENGINEER
Page 71 and 72:
Figure 23: Worldwide VC and Private
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 25: 2015 Global Robotics Inv
Page 75 and 76:
Global private investment trends fo
Page 77 and 78:
Notable hardware accelerators that
Page 79 and 80:
carrying out investigations into ot
Page 81 and 82:
The National Security Engineering C
Page 83 and 84:
8. GUIDANCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS If
Page 85 and 86:
Massachusetts robotics companies se
Page 87 and 88:
8.2.8. Offer Low-cost Loans for Dev
Page 89 and 90:
8.4.1. Strengthen Cluster Ties The
Page 91 and 92:
9. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ME
Page 93 and 94:
9.1.5. Simplify, Limit, and Standar
Page 95 and 96:
Figure 31: The Implementation Metho
Page 97 and 98:
programs from other internships is
Page 99 and 100:
Massachusetts Technology Leadership
Page 101 and 102:
12. APPENDIX B: LIST OF TABLES Tabl
Page 103 and 104:
http://lis.csail.mit.edu/new/resear
Page 105 and 106:
14. APPENDIX D: WAGES FOR ROBOTICS
Page 107 and 108:
14.3. SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, SYSTEMS
Page 109 and 110:
14.5. COMPUTER HARDWARE ENGINEERS*
Page 111 and 112:
CONSUMER Consumer - Home Care/Lawn
Page 113 and 114:
17. APPENDIX G: ACRONYMS USED IN TH
Page 115 and 116:
sUGV SW TRI UAS UGS UGV UMS UNCTAD
Page 117 and 118:
Endeavor Robotics Bedford www.endea
Page 119 and 120:
www.abiresearch.com THE MASSACHUSET
Page 121 and 122:
Geartronics Industries 100 Chelmsfo
Page 123:
Published October 18, 2016 ©2016 A
show all

ROBOTICS CLUSTER

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?