31.10.2016 Views

November 1, 2016 Indian Newslink Digital Edition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32<br />

Sportslink<br />

BCCI could be bowled out for unruly defiance<br />

Ravi Nyayapati<br />

The Supreme Court of India, in<br />

its ruling on October 21, <strong>2016</strong>,<br />

limited the financial freedom<br />

of the Board of Control<br />

for Cricket in India (BCCI) until it<br />

complied with the recommendations<br />

of the Lodha Commission, setup to<br />

transform cricket governance in<br />

India.<br />

The New Zealand media picked<br />

up the speculation that the Black<br />

Caps’ ongoing tour of India may be<br />

cancelled.<br />

The Lodha Commission, headed<br />

by former Chief Justice of India, RM<br />

Lodha, submitted a report in January<br />

<strong>2016</strong>, recommending sweeping<br />

reforms to shake-up cricket governance<br />

in India. The BCCI has been<br />

resisting the verdict.<br />

Domination<br />

The BCCI prides itself of the<br />

command it has in World Cricket.<br />

After decades of dominance by its<br />

English and Australian counterparts,<br />

BCCI has become the authoritative<br />

figure within the ranks of the International<br />

Cricket Council (ICC).<br />

Such is its influence that it dictates<br />

its own terms, defying the norms of<br />

the general rule book. For example,<br />

it chooses not to use the Decision<br />

Review System (DRS) in a bilateral<br />

series, or have ‘strategic time-outs’ in<br />

T20 games for commercial benefits.<br />

This commercial dominance has<br />

been a catalyst to a remarkable shift<br />

in Team India’s overall performance.<br />

Gone are the days of nervousness<br />

where games involving the boys in<br />

blue were subject to uncertainty and<br />

trepidation. Now, the <strong>Indian</strong> team<br />

is in the top league in all formats of<br />

the game.<br />

A glut of troubles<br />

Amidst all this glory, the BCCI has<br />

unfortunately been embarrassed<br />

very often on the world stage.<br />

Cricket is perhaps the only sport<br />

of India with a true patriotic fervour<br />

of its people. Yet, BCCI continues to<br />

be mired in controversies, be it with<br />

the ICC or with the <strong>Indian</strong> judicial<br />

system.<br />

The Lodha Commission was<br />

established for a very good reason –<br />

to focus on the irregularities of BCCI,<br />

especially because of match fixing<br />

and corruption that became more<br />

common after the advent of the<br />

<strong>Indian</strong> Premier League (IPL).<br />

In July 2015, the Lodha Commission<br />

gave its final submission and<br />

placed a ban of two years on IPL<br />

franchises ‘Rajasthan Royals’ and<br />

the highly successful ‘Chennai Super<br />

Kings,’ which boasted of Captain<br />

Mahendra Singh Dhoni at its helm.<br />

Structure and Constitution<br />

The Commission submitted a report<br />

in January <strong>2016</strong> recommending<br />

reforms to the structure, constitution<br />

and governance of BCCI.<br />

Basic structural and constitutional<br />

issues were identified, such as the<br />

absence of representatives from<br />

states such as Bihar, Chhattisgarh,<br />

Uttarakhand and six North-Eastern<br />

states, even though there are 30 full<br />

time members in BCCI.<br />

A notable yet bizarre irregularity<br />

is that BCCI is still registered as a<br />

society under Tamil Nadu Society<br />

Registration Act. State Associations<br />

are all registered under different<br />

types of establishments.<br />

The Lodha Commission wants to<br />

rectify these irregularities by ensuring<br />

that each state is represented<br />

by only one member (and therefore<br />

one vote) and an associate member<br />

status is given for smaller states so<br />

that their views may be considered.<br />

This would bring about uniformity<br />

in BCCI’s constitution.<br />

Governance<br />

BCCI’s governance was noted as<br />

particularly poor by the Commission.<br />

For example, the President of the<br />

Board has all powers of management<br />

including selection of teams<br />

and the power to veto the Selection<br />

Commission.<br />

The absence of women in the<br />

organisation has been noted.<br />

The Commission highlighted the<br />

contentious issue of unlimited term<br />

for office-bearers; worse, there are<br />

no grounds for disqualifications on<br />

which an office bearer must demit<br />

office.<br />

The Commission has recommended<br />

an Apex Council comprising nine<br />

members including the President,<br />

who will all collectively share the<br />

powers.<br />

It has also recommended the<br />

appointment of a CEO and the term<br />

of office-bearers to three years,<br />

limited to two continuous terms. In<br />

addition, no person can hold two<br />

posts at the same time.<br />

The Commission has also said that<br />

ministers and government officials<br />

should not be included in the BCCI<br />

governing body. The current President<br />

is a Member of Parliament.<br />

NOVEMBER 1, <strong>2016</strong><br />

<strong>Indian</strong> Premier League<br />

A range of sensible steps have<br />

also been suggested for <strong>Indian</strong><br />

Premier League (IPL) management.<br />

To counter match-fixing issues, the<br />

Commission’s view is that it should<br />

be made a criminal offence and betting<br />

should be legalised except for<br />

players and those people covered by<br />

the BCCI and IPL regulations.<br />

Unnecessary Resistance<br />

In September <strong>2016</strong>, ICC refused to<br />

be embroiled in the controversy.<br />

Its current President is Shashank<br />

Manohar, a former BCCI President,<br />

highly regarded for his stance on<br />

logic and rationale in the sport.<br />

The spirit of Lodha Commission<br />

report accentuates the need to reform<br />

cricket in India by eliminating<br />

poor governance.<br />

However, BCCI has been fighting<br />

tooth-and-nail to resist the recommendation<br />

and of late has been<br />

cherry picking recommendations.<br />

Its disregard for the legal mandate<br />

is incomprehensible.<br />

After all, most recommendations<br />

are logical and necessary.<br />

On September 28, <strong>2016</strong>, Chief Justice<br />

of India TS Thakur warned BCCI<br />

of its resistance as the September 30<br />

deadline approached. On missing<br />

this deadline, the Court ordered the<br />

financial lockout.<br />

This report may set the landmark<br />

for reforms in other sports bodies<br />

in India.<br />

The challenge at hand is to see it<br />

implemented.<br />

BCCI president Thakur and<br />

secretary Ajay Shirke are to meet the<br />

Lodha Commission before <strong>November</strong><br />

3, <strong>2016</strong> to report on progress.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!