23.01.2017 Views

SOYBEAN and BEES

BFhV4z

BFhV4z

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

et al. (2003) conducted studies in 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002 using two soybean cultivars, Pace (whiteflowered)<br />

<strong>and</strong> DP3588 (purple-flowered), selected for their equivalent flowering dates. The<br />

experiments utilized the dominance of purple flower color over white flower color to identify<br />

natural cross-pollinations. In the first experiment, 12 rows of ‘Pace’ (white-flowered)<br />

flanked on each side by four rows of ‘DP3588’ (purple flowered) were sown in the spring of<br />

2001. Seeds were harvested by row from each of the ‘Pace’ rows <strong>and</strong> examined for natural<br />

cross-pollinations in the next generation. In total, 73,512 potential hybrid plants were examined<br />

<strong>and</strong> natural cross-pollination rates ranged from 0.41% at 0.9 m from the pollen source<br />

to 0.03% at 5.4 m from the pollen source. These values were consistent with values previously<br />

reported in the literature.<br />

In a second experiment, seeds of ‘Pace’ <strong>and</strong> ‘DP3588’ were alternately sown 15.2 cm apart<br />

within a row, in the same season of the previous study. At maturity, 167 Pace plants (whiteflowered)<br />

were harvested <strong>and</strong> a total of 19,151 progeny were evaluated for natural crosspollinations,<br />

expressed in the next generation. The progeny of 56 (33.5%) of the 167 parent<br />

plants showed no evidence of natural crosspollination. The progeny of the remaining 111<br />

plants exhibited natural cross-pollination rates ranging from 0.65 to 6.32% <strong>and</strong> averaged<br />

1.8%. The maximum rates reported here are considerably higher than most previously reported<br />

rates, according to Ray et al. (2003).<br />

Relating to soybean pest resistance, there is a concern involving the potential negative impact<br />

of the soybean proteinase inhibitor – a trait for soybean resistance to insects - <strong>and</strong> the<br />

foraging strategy of honeybees, as referred by Sagili et al. (2005). Laboratory studies reported<br />

disruption of the digestive physiology <strong>and</strong> learning behavior in individual honeybees treated<br />

with Bowman-Birk inhibitor (BBI), a serine proteinase inhibitor expressed in some GM plants<br />

(Dechaume-Moncharmont et al., 2005). These authors investigated possible behavioral<br />

effects of this transgene on honeybees at the colony level, maintained in laboratory conditions.<br />

A choice experiment, based on 150 free-flying individuals was set up, which performed<br />

over 7,700 visits on the flowers. The mean number of visits per hour, the mean time spent on<br />

the feeder <strong>and</strong> the interval between consecutive visits were not significantly different when<br />

the feeding sucrose solution was mixed with BBI at 100 μg·mL –1 , a dose close to the expression<br />

level in planta.<br />

Soybean is not considered an anemophilous plant, ones that have cross-pollination mediated<br />

by the wind. Yoshimura (2011) investigated the subject, using Durham pollen samplers<br />

located up to 20 m from the field edge. In addition, the dispersal distance was assessed in a<br />

wind tunnel under constant airflow <strong>and</strong> then it was compared with the anticipated distances<br />

based on the pollen diameter. In the field, the maximum pollen density per day observed was<br />

1.235 grains cm -2 day -1 at three observation points within 2.5 m from the field. Inside the field,<br />

SoybeAn <strong>and</strong> bees<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!