09.12.2012 Views

IOBC/wprs Bulletin Vol. 28(2) 2005

IOBC/wprs Bulletin Vol. 28(2) 2005

IOBC/wprs Bulletin Vol. 28(2) 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

the Welsh chafer Hoplia philanthus (Fuessly, 1775) and the Garden chafer Phyllopertha<br />

horticola (L., 1758).<br />

As a secondary damage of the infestation of the grubs but more severe for the landscape<br />

is the damage caused by wild pigs leaving at night the forests for rooting and digging up the<br />

grubs to devour them.<br />

To avoid all the damages in the grassland it became necessary to fight the real cause, to<br />

reduce the grubs to a tolerable level.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Design of the trial<br />

The last cockchafer flight in the Hessenthal-Mespelbrunn valley was in 2003. The treatment<br />

started at the end of April 2004 to fight the second larval stage after the first hibernation.<br />

In the experiment the grubs should be controlled in three different ways: Firstly in a<br />

mechanical way with a rotary hoe/rotary cultivator, secondly with a biological antagonist, the<br />

entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria brongniartii, thirdly by chemical treatments with the<br />

insecticides Imidacloprid and Carbofuran. In table 1 the six different variants are listed. Every<br />

variant besides var. 6 (Imidacloprid, Gasur) was tested in three plots, each plot being of a size<br />

of 25 metres in length and 9 metres in width. Gasur was tested in a long strip of nearly 150 m<br />

length and 3 m width close-by the other plots. On the day of the treatments the grubs were in<br />

a depth of about 2 centimetres.<br />

Table 1. The different variants of the cockchafer control experiment in the Spessart region Hessenthal-<br />

Mespelbrunn<br />

Var. Variant Concentration (+) milling way of control<br />

1 Untreated control --- no none (natural)<br />

2 Rotary hoe/cultivator --- yes mechanical<br />

3 Beauveria fungus 50 kg/ha no biological<br />

4 Carbofuran (Carbosip) 10 kg/ha yes chem. + mech.<br />

5 Imidacloprid (Confidor) 0,15 kg/ha yes chem. + mech.<br />

6 Imidacloprid (Gasur) 100 ml/100 kg/ha no chemical<br />

In the untreated control only the natural decrease of the grubs’ population caused by<br />

predators, bacterial or fungal diseases could be observed. The Beauveria fungus was applied<br />

in the form of Melocont ® -Pilzgerste. The kernels were brought into the soil by using a special<br />

slit seedling machine. The same seedling machine was used to disperse evenly Imidacloprid<br />

in the Gasur form. In these three variants the turf was not milled.<br />

To apply both Carbofuran and Imidacloprid in the Confidor form into the soil a rotary<br />

cultivator was used. The same rotary hoe was used for milling the mechanically treated plots<br />

to fling up the grubs to the daylight, where they died because of ultraviolet radiation or being<br />

killed of birds. As in the last three variants the turf was completely destroyed after the<br />

treatments the grass has to be reseeded.<br />

For measuring the efficacy of a certain treatment the number of the grubs, the healthy<br />

ones and the fungal infected ones, in the different plots were counted and the results were<br />

compared with the untreated variant. In using a so-called Goettinger frame four times a square<br />

metre of the sod was digged up in every plot and the soil was searched for grubs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!