03.02.2017 Views

Nepal

SPA24

SPA24

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.4 ADHERENCE TO STANDARDS FOR QUALITY SERVICE PROVISION<br />

To assess whether family planning providers adhere to service standards, NHFS staff observed<br />

family planning client-provider interactions using checklists based on commonly accepted guidelines for<br />

screening, counseling, and conducting procedures for family planning clients. The observers collected<br />

information to answer the following questions:<br />

<br />

<br />

Did providers talk about topics essential to determining the appropriateness of the methods<br />

discussed, and, where necessary, did they conduct the physical examination needed to screen<br />

clients for method eligibility?<br />

Did the conditions and procedures followed for provision of specific methods meet national<br />

standard criteria for quality service provision?<br />

The NHFS observers noted what information the provider shared with a client and whether an<br />

examination, where appropriate, was conducted prior to dispensing a method. They did not assess whether<br />

the information given was correct or whether the findings of the examination were appropriately interpreted.<br />

Overall, a total of 768 family planning consultations were observed during the NHFS. Less than<br />

one-fifth of the female family planning clients observed were making their first family planning-related visit.<br />

Tables 5.8.1 through 5.9.2 provide details on first-visit consultations. Tables 5.10.1 and 5.10.2 provide<br />

similar information for all female family planning clients.<br />

5.4.1 Counseling and Client Assessment at First Family Planning Visits<br />

During a family planning visit, especially during a client’s first visit, providers are expected to elicit<br />

information about clients’ personal and health history to help them make an informed choice about<br />

contraceptive use and the methods they might adopt. Therefore, during observations of first family planning<br />

visits, NHFS staff noted what information providers obtained about clients’ reproductive and medical history<br />

and what examinations were conducted. The observers also recorded information relating to the counseling<br />

that occurred during the visit.<br />

Tables 5.8.1 and 5.8.2 present information for first-visit clients on whether providers discussed<br />

specific elements of the client’s reproductive and medical history and conducted the two relevant<br />

examinations (blood pressure and weight), by background characteristics. With regard to the elements of the<br />

client’s reproductive history, just over half of providers asked about the client’s age (54 percent), history of<br />

pregnancy (56 percent), current pregnancy status (53 percent), and the regularity of her menstrual cycle (51<br />

percent). Surprisingly, providers generally did not discuss the woman’s childbearing desires (17 percent) or<br />

breastfeeding status (if she had ever been pregnant) (10 percent), both of which may be important in deciding<br />

on an appropriate contraceptive method. Overall, providers asked about all six items of the client’s<br />

reproductive history in only 2 percent of consultations, all of which took place in health posts.<br />

With regard to the client’s medical history, the most commonly discussed item was chronic illness<br />

(19 percent). Providers only rarely asked whether the woman had any symptoms of sexually transmitted<br />

infections (STIs) (4 percent) or smoked (3 percent).<br />

Just under two-thirds of providers took the client’s blood pressure, and 57 percent weighed the<br />

client. Only a minority of providers (30 percent) asked if the client had concerns or questions about methods<br />

the client had ever used.<br />

Family Planning Services • 105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!