InBrief7_web
InBrief7_web
InBrief7_web
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36<br />
Human Rights Obligations of Armed Non-State Actors:<br />
An Exploration of the Practice of the UN Human Rights Council<br />
Step 1. Determine an ANSA’s characteristics and the applicable legal<br />
framework.<br />
As explained in this research, there is clear practice suggesting that ANSAs<br />
are bound by a broader set of human rights obligations when they exercise de<br />
facto governmental functions or exercise control over a population. Whenever<br />
ANSAs are addressed in HRC resolutions, we therefore recommend that their<br />
characteristics are carefully analysed and determined. In particular, drafters should<br />
assess whether the ANSA in question can be considered a de facto authority or<br />
whether a population lives under its control.<br />
Determining the ANSA’s level of organization will also clarify the applicability of<br />
IHL. Determining the applicability of IHL to a given situation is a difficult exercise.<br />
Information and guidance on this issue can be found in the Rule of Law in Armed<br />
Conflict Project (www.rulac.org) or The War Report of the Geneva Academy of<br />
International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights.<br />
Where a situation cannot be qualified as a non-international armed conflict, only<br />
human rights law is applicable and it becomes particularly important to determine<br />
types of violation in order to avoid a gap in protection.<br />
Step 2. Determine the types of violation.<br />
Some practice tends to show that all forms of ANSA are bound to respect human<br />
rights which are peremptory norms of international law (or jus cogens) and<br />
whose violation can lead to the establishment of individual criminal responsibility,<br />
whether or not the ANSA responsible controls territory and whether or not IHL is<br />
applicable. For other types of violations, where the legal framework is less clear,<br />
it is suggested that only ANSAs that act as de facto authorities may be bound by<br />
human rights law. Two questions may be considered:<br />
• Do the acts violate peremptory norms of HRL? Can they to lead to the<br />
establishment of individual criminal responsibility?<br />
• Do the acts violate other types of human rights norms?<br />
These recommendations are summarized in the two charts below.