InBrief7_web

Human Rights Obligations of Armed Non-State Actors:
An Exploration of the Practice of the UN Human Rights Council
51
M. Sassòli and L. Olson, ‘The relationship between international humanitarian
law and human rights law where it matters: admissible killing and internment of
fighters in non- international armed conflicts’, 90 International Review of the Red
Cross 871 (2008), 599-627.
M. Schoiswohl, ‘De facto regimes and human rights obligations–the twilight zone
of public international law?’, Austrian Review of International and European Law
6 (2001), 50.
S. Sivakumaran, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts, Oxford University
Press, 2012.
S. Sivakumaran, ‘Binding Armed Opposition Groups’, 55 International and
Comparative Law Quarterly (2006), 369-394.
M. Ssenyonjo, ‘The Applicability of International Human Rights Law to Non-State
Actors: What Relevance to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights?’, 12 International
Journal of Human Rights (2008), 725-60.
M. Ssenyonjo, ‘Accountability of non-state actors in Uganda for war crimes and
human rights violations: Between amnesty and the International Criminal Court’,
10 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 3 (2005), 405-434.
J. Van Essen, ‘De Facto Regimes in International Law’, 28 Utrecht Journal of
International and European Law 74 (2012), 31-49.
S. Vité, ‘Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal
concepts and actual situations’, 91 International Review of the Red Cross 873
(2009), 69-94.
L. Zegveld, The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law,
Cambridge University Press, 2002.