11.12.2012 Views

Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques ... - Index of - Free

Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques ... - Index of - Free

Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques ... - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Overview: The Social Life <strong>of</strong> KM <strong>Tools</strong> 55<br />

An organization or community can be said to be at Level 1 <strong>of</strong> KM infrastructure<br />

complexity if it uses not more than one family <strong>of</strong> digital KM tools. This includes the<br />

many organizations that have just made the leap from paper to digital document management<br />

systems (Level 1A, e.g., the airline Go which was acquired by easyJet) or the<br />

innumerable communities <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, hobbyists, <strong>and</strong> activists who use basic<br />

e-mail lists for knowledge networking (Level 1B).<br />

Level 0 organizations use no digital KM tools, but instead use other traditional<br />

ones like paper documents, libraries, co-located collaboration, <strong>and</strong> face-to-face mentoring<br />

arrangements. This has serious implications for scalability, efficiency, <strong>and</strong><br />

reusability <strong>of</strong> knowledge in such organizations <strong>and</strong> has caused a lot <strong>of</strong> concern,<br />

particularly in the emerging economies <strong>of</strong> the world. (More on that in the next<br />

section.)<br />

If an organization or community uses two families <strong>of</strong> digital KM tools, it can<br />

be said to be at Level 2 <strong>of</strong> KM infrastructure complexity. For instance, the Unilever<br />

case study features the use <strong>of</strong> content <strong>and</strong> computational tools for creative brainstorming,<br />

but collaborative activities still take place largely face-to-face (Level 2B).<br />

Organizations which weigh in on different sides <strong>of</strong> the codification versus personalization<br />

debate may choose to place more emphasis on one or the other family <strong>of</strong> KM<br />

tools.<br />

An organization or community which uses all three families <strong>of</strong> KM tools can be<br />

said to be at Level 3 <strong>of</strong> KM infrastructure complexity. Most <strong>of</strong> the larger organizations<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iled in this book are at Level 3; they provide a wide range <strong>of</strong> tools for their knowledge<br />

workers around the world, but also invest heavily in technology integration,<br />

change management, <strong>and</strong> capacity building for using these tools. See Table 1.13 for a<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> these three levels; more case studies <strong>and</strong> analysis would be needed to<br />

tease apart the distinctions among Level 3 organizations.<br />

Table 1.13<br />

Levels <strong>of</strong> Complexity <strong>of</strong> KM Infrastructure<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> complexity<br />

<strong>of</strong> KM infrastructure<br />

Characteristics Examples<br />

Level 0 No digital KM tools are Paper documents, copresent<br />

located collaboration,<br />

face-to-face mentoring<br />

Level 1 Only one family <strong>of</strong> KM Content management<br />

tools is present tools or messaging/<br />

groupware<br />

Level 2 Two families <strong>of</strong> KM tools Digital publishing + search,<br />

are present content management +<br />

(e.g., content <strong>and</strong><br />

collaboration or<br />

content <strong>and</strong><br />

computation)<br />

groupware<br />

Level 3 All families <strong>of</strong> KM tools Content management +<br />

are present search + groupware<br />

Source: Author.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!