13.03.2017 Views

0745685749 enemies democracy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 The Inner Enemies of Democracy<br />

to the powerful of this world, or else to the crowd. The<br />

demand for autonomy emerges from the academies and<br />

salons and is debated out on the streets; the struggle is<br />

led, not by scholars, but by men engaged in the public<br />

arena. In this way, the issues first mooted in private and<br />

personal publications led to the French Revolution.<br />

In the years leading up to the outbreak of the<br />

Revolution, the moderate attitude, as it could be seen in<br />

the thought of Montesquieu (and even Rousseau), was<br />

subjected to strong criticism from other representatives<br />

of the Enlightenment, thus introducing a real split in this<br />

line of thought. The iconic figure here is Condorcet, who<br />

wrote a commentary on the work of Montesquieu. On<br />

the crucial issue of the appropriate legislation for each<br />

country, he condemned the pluralism of his predecessor<br />

and what he saw as his conservatism. If, through science<br />

and reason, it has been established what the right<br />

laws must be, why not give these laws to all people?<br />

More generally, we find in Condorcet an optimism of<br />

the will: in a thoroughly Pelagian spirit he thinks that,<br />

if we apply ourselves to the task, we will be able to<br />

eradicate evil from the face of the earth; the march of<br />

progress will continue indefinitely, and all men will one<br />

day lead lives of fulfilment. Faith in continuous and<br />

unlimited progress, a faith of which Condorcet is one<br />

of the main promoters, applies to mankind as a whole<br />

the individual’s capacity for development, affirmed by<br />

Pelagius. Here, within the Enlightenment, we move<br />

from what might seem like a ‘wait and see’ attitude (that<br />

of Montesquieu) to a spirited activism.<br />

The shifts in the themes and place of the debate<br />

blended with the voluntarism of Condorcet, and together<br />

they provided an appropriate framework for the ardent<br />

longings that were now widespread. The new thinking<br />

found favour with the protagonists of the Revolution.<br />

Moreover, Condorcet would be one of them: no longer<br />

satisfied with being secretary of the French Academy, he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!