Gender Inequality and Economic Development Fertility Education and Norms

Recommendations

Info

Figure 12: Changing Views on Working Women A: Women Without Children B: Women With Children Under School Age Do you think that women should work outside the home full-time or part-time when they are married but with no children? Do you think that women should work outside the home full-time or part-time when there is a child under school age? Women Stay at Home (% agreeing) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Women Stay at Home (% agreeing) 0 20 40 60 80 100 5000 15000 25000 35000 45000 GDP Per Capita 5000 15000 25000 35000 45000 GDP Per Capita C: Women With Children In School D: Women With Children Who Have Left Home Do you think that women should work outside the home full-time or part-time when the youngest child is still in school? Do you think that women should work outside the home full-time or part-time when the child has left the home? Women Stay at Home (% agreeing) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Women Stay at Home (% agreeing) 0 20 40 60 80 100 5000 15000 25000 35000 45000 GDP Per Capita 5000 15000 25000 35000 45000 GDP Per Capita Notes: The figure is based on data from the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) in 2002 and reports attitudes towards working women, captured in four different statements. Each panel shows the relationship between PPP-adjusted real GDP per capita and the average probability to agree with a particular statement in each country. Observations are divided in 10 bins of GDP per capita, with similar number of observations per bin. We report the average probability in each bin controlling for country fixed effects, along with the robust 95% confidence interval. See text for details. 33
Figure A.I: Gender Inequality in College Across Countries Today (2010-2015) Russia Estonia Finland Slovenia Iceland Poland Norway Sweden Denmark Australia United States Spain Israel Panama Brazil United Kingdom Uruguay Colombia Dominican Republic Canada Slovakia Italy France Georgia Serbia Belgium Greece Czech Republic South Africa Ireland Peru Mexico Romania Guatemala Egypt Netherlands China Taiwan India Germany Austria Japan South Korea Switzerland -20 -10 0 10 20 Gender Gap (pp) Notes: The figure reports the latest gender gap in the probability to hold a college degree among the 16-64 year olds for all countries for which we have a survey in the period 2010-2015. 34
Page 1 and 2: Gender Inequality and Economic Deve
Page 3 and 4: our paper lies partly in the data g
Page 5 and 6: 2 Data and Methods 2.1 Data To docu
Page 7 and 8: among men and women, respectively,
Page 9 and 10: graph also suggests a non-linear ef
Page 11 and 12: labor force participation over the
Page 13 and 14: stant over the development path, th
Page 15 and 16: average earnings by D Y = (Ȳ m Ȳ
Page 17 and 18: 4.3 Gender Norms So far we have foc
Page 19 and 20: A key contribution of our paper lie
Page 21 and 22: BLAU, FRANCINE, &KAHN, LAWRENCE. 20
Page 23 and 24: Figure 1: Gender Inequality in Earn
Page 25 and 26: Figure 3: Gender Inequality in Hour
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5: Demographic Transition A:
Page 29 and 30: Figure 7: Demographic Transition an
Page 31 and 32: Figure 9: Gender Inequality in Coll
Page 33: Figure 11: Changing Views on the Ch
Page 37 and 38: Table A.1: Panel B - Countries C-F
Page 39 and 40: Table A.1: Panel D - Countries I-N
Page 41 and 42: Table A.1: Panel F - Countries S-U

Gender Inequality and Economic Development Fertility Education and Norms

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?