31.03.2017 Views

WINFO Issue #30

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GREG DEMPSON<br />

by Greg Dempson<br />

TOTAL PLAY - GONZAGA BULLDOGS VS.<br />

SOUTH CAROLINA GAMECOCKS<br />

This is a unique match-up as both<br />

teams are making their first Final<br />

Four appearance in school history.<br />

For almost 25 years I lived in the great<br />

white north, (Edmonton, Alberta).<br />

Back in the day the Edmonton cable<br />

feed came from Spokane, Washington<br />

which gave me many opportunities<br />

to watch the Gonzaga Bulldogs<br />

long before they became a “fashionable”<br />

team to follow. To be sure,<br />

they do play in a lesser or second tier<br />

conference while the Gamecocks play<br />

in the mighty SEC.<br />

To many, including myself, this line<br />

might appear a bit on the high side<br />

at -6.5. Having said that, how many<br />

of you reading this were duped into<br />

backing the Xavier Musketeers as<br />

+8.5 dogs in Gonzaga’s last game?<br />

The Bulldogs crushed the Musketeers,<br />

(83-59.). That said, I am still<br />

not comfortable laying the points, so<br />

I looked at the first half over/under<br />

instead.<br />

South Carolina has been able to come<br />

out of the locker room after the first<br />

half and “batten down the hatches!”<br />

Thus they’ve steam rolled the likes of<br />

Florida, Baylor, Duke, Marquette and<br />

Alabama in their previous neutral site<br />

contests. Their scoring has been limited<br />

in the first half in those five contests<br />

as they averaged only 32.8 PPG<br />

in the first half while allowing 31.9<br />

points. In the second half, in those five<br />

contests they averaged approximately<br />

one-third more on the scoreboard<br />

tallying 45.4 while holding those previous<br />

five opponents to an average of<br />

36.6 points per second half.<br />

This 2016/2017 edition of Gonzaga<br />

is by far the best defensive team I’ve<br />

watched, and as stated, I have been<br />

following the Bulldogs since they were<br />

little pups! When reviewing their past<br />

five neutral site tournament games<br />

I note the Bulldogs are scoring an<br />

average of 36.4 while allowing an<br />

average of 25.8 first half points for a<br />

positive net average of 10.6 first half<br />

points. That margin is significantly<br />

higher than the +0.9 average noted by<br />

the Gamecocks.<br />

Doing the Math<br />

When factoring recent performances<br />

by each team we have a combined<br />

total of 62.2 for and against points for<br />

Gonzaga vs. an average combined total<br />

of 63.45 for South Carolina. When<br />

adding those two totals the number<br />

becomes 125.65, and dividing by two<br />

gives us a total of 62.825. Looking<br />

at the total in the first half the most<br />

common number is 64.5 with the<br />

Bulldogs at -3.5 @ -115 at one of the<br />

outs I have.<br />

Is the Glass Half-Full or Half-<br />

Empty System?<br />

When a team from a major Division<br />

1-A Conference plays a foe from a<br />

second tier conference playing with<br />

five or six days of rest, play the first<br />

half under the total when the Over/Under<br />

is between 60.5 to 65.5 points. By<br />

backing the under in this first half the<br />

success of this system is 14-32 = 70%<br />

to the UNDER the past five seasons.<br />

The average first half score in this<br />

system is 59.9 points.<br />

In Review<br />

Last week’s selection lost and I am<br />

4-3-2 with my basketball selections<br />

here at Winfo and 1-0 ATS with my<br />

lone Blog offering.<br />

Final Four Play<br />

This is what I call a “beer and pizza”<br />

bet, as it will be a recreational type of<br />

a play only for me, but I am on Gonzaga/South<br />

Carolina to stay under the<br />

first half total of 64.5 points<br />

Good luck with all your plays!<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!