03.04.2017 Views

West Newsmagazine 4-5-17

Local news, local politics and community events for West St. Louis County Missouri.

Local news, local politics and community events for West St. Louis County Missouri.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 I OPINION I<br />

April 5, 20<strong>17</strong><br />

WEST NEWSMAGAZINE<br />

@WESTNEWSMAG<br />

WESTNEWSMAGAZINE.COM<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

OBAMACARE FIGHT:<br />

Unhealthy, un-wealthy, unwise<br />

The healthcare fight was over before it<br />

started.<br />

Actually, to clarify, the health insurance<br />

fight was over before it started. For the<br />

last 100 years, American citizens have had<br />

access to world-leading healthcare. That is<br />

not what this discussion is about. This fight<br />

is over how that care is paid for, and in<br />

this country, at this time, that means health<br />

insurance.<br />

So why was the battle lost before the<br />

combatants even took the field? Because<br />

the entire discussion was framed around<br />

what people would lose under a new program.<br />

Obamacare became something that<br />

was given to the people, and Trumpcare<br />

was viewed as something that would take<br />

away from the people. Every story led with<br />

how many people might lose insurance or<br />

lose tax subsidies under the Trump/Ryan<br />

plan. This is the exact same scenario that<br />

has played out with every entitlement<br />

program ever foisted into the political<br />

landscape. Once something is “given,” it<br />

becomes nearly impossible to peel it away.<br />

Paul Ryan was unable to make any compelling<br />

argument to the contrary.<br />

To be fair, the Trumpcare plan, as constructed<br />

and proposed, was pretty awful.<br />

It may have actually been a worse version<br />

of Obamacare. The reason behind that<br />

is because the argument made in the first<br />

paragraphs of this editorial is well understood<br />

by politicians of both parties, and<br />

those politicians lack the political courage<br />

to say what they are really thinking.<br />

Both sides dislike Obamacare. Both<br />

sides are aware that it has significant issues<br />

that threaten its long-term viability. Neither<br />

side, however, will come right out and say<br />

what they truly believe because of political<br />

repercussions.<br />

This is why people hate Washington and<br />

why Donald Trump is our president, by the<br />

way. He at least appeared to have the courage<br />

to say almost anything that was on his<br />

mind.<br />

Both sides of the political spectrum<br />

acknowledge that our healthcare system,<br />

caused in large part by our health insurance<br />

system, is wildly overpriced. We pay as<br />

much for administration as we do for care,<br />

and that is absurd. We pay significantly<br />

more per capita than any other nation in the<br />

world. Obamacare did very little to address<br />

this, and in many ways exasperated the<br />

problem. This is all well known, and it is a<br />

point of agreement.<br />

Liberals believe that the way to fix this<br />

problem is to have government manage<br />

the healthcare system completely. They<br />

believe that every person in this country<br />

should have access to “free” healthcare<br />

just like they have access to public education.<br />

This is the single-payer argument and<br />

it is a reasonable position. Conservatives,<br />

on the other hand, believe that the healthcare<br />

system should be market-driven and<br />

less encumbered by regulation. Markets<br />

drive down cost and increase quality every<br />

time they are used, so long as the markets<br />

have sufficient freedom to operate. This is<br />

the private healthcare argument, and once<br />

again it is a reasonable position.<br />

What we ended up with, in both the<br />

enacted version of Obamacare and the<br />

proposed version of Trumpcare, was a<br />

hybrid that combined the worst of both<br />

concepts. Both are highly regulated, multiparticipant<br />

programs that invariably drive<br />

up the cost of administration. The result<br />

is that we never have a discussion around<br />

reducing actual costs of healthcare and<br />

certainly never discuss improving the quality<br />

of care. Instead, we have a discussion<br />

of whose tax incentives are the best and<br />

where those incentives are directed.<br />

We ignore the fact that business owners,<br />

who finance the vast majority of health<br />

insurance in this country, are left out of<br />

both sides of this equation. All because our<br />

political system has lost the ability to have<br />

a conversation.<br />

As President Trump would say, “Sad!”<br />

IN QUOTES<br />

“Something is obviously<br />

working for Mike and<br />

Karen Pence, who have<br />

been married for 31<br />

years despite the kind<br />

of high-power, highdemand<br />

career that has<br />

derailed many other<br />

Washington marriages.”<br />

– Ruth Slater, a Slate<br />

columnist on Vice President<br />

Mike Pence and the socalled<br />

Billy Graham rule.<br />

“We’re all neighbors<br />

and we all need to take<br />

care of each other.”<br />

– Eureka Alderman Wes<br />

Sir, on the formation of a<br />

disaster relief committee<br />

FOLLOW US ON<br />

The Blues Alumni game was the last<br />

game played at the Hardees IcePlex.<br />

The Hardees IcePlex has seen its final game.<br />

All we can say is “Thanks for the memories!”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!