12.12.2012 Views

Accounting for Interdiscursivity: Challenges to Professional Expertise

Accounting for Interdiscursivity: Challenges to Professional Expertise

Accounting for Interdiscursivity: Challenges to Professional Expertise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

Chris<strong>to</strong>pher N. Candlin<br />

• What is their source?<br />

• How are they drawn upon or co-constructed in critical moments<br />

in given sites?<br />

• What is their relationship <strong>to</strong> work and action in particular sites?<br />

• How pervasive are they across discourse types and activity types?<br />

• How are they realized textually and semiotically?<br />

• How are they recognised as significant and by whom?<br />

• What role does their deployment play in underpinning<br />

professional expertise?<br />

4. Focus on research<br />

We have claimed at the outset of this chapter that coping with the<br />

challenges of interdiscursivity is a characteristic of professional<br />

expertise. We further came <strong>to</strong> the conclusion that in order <strong>to</strong> explore<br />

and attempt <strong>to</strong> explain such interdiscursivity and such expertise it was<br />

inadequate only, or even primarily, <strong>to</strong> focus our attention on the<br />

descriptive features of text. In making this claim, and directing our<br />

attention <strong>to</strong>wards activity type, discourse type and, in particular,<br />

strategy, we do not, of course, avoid the need <strong>to</strong> carefully describe<br />

realizations multi-modally, and in any case semiotically, and not<br />

merely linguistically. One might then begin this focus on research<br />

with the assertion that given this stance, interdiscursively managed<br />

communication requires an interdiscursive methodology, one that<br />

employs a range of methodologies in a multiply-focused study of the<br />

available data – such a data set being unders<strong>to</strong>od as not merely what<br />

was, or significantly was not, articulated or displayed, but also what<br />

drew in as relevant data participant narrative, institutional and<br />

organizational analysis, both in the context of the his<strong>to</strong>rical as well as<br />

the immediate, and involving micro and macro perspectives.<br />

Candlin (1997: xii) makes the following claim in this context:<br />

[…] what emerges is a requirement <strong>for</strong> […] a complex interdiscursivity of<br />

analysis, matching the interplay between the micro and the macro, the actual<br />

and the his<strong>to</strong>rical, the ethnographic and the ethnomethodological, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!