15.05.2017 Views

novelistsonnovel00allo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE NATURE OF PROSE FICTION<br />

Romance'. 'What a duce,' writes Richardson in 1762, 'do you<br />

think I am writing a Romance? Don't you see that I am copying<br />

Nature?' ^ More than a century later, James still recognizes<br />

this difference, although he is more acutely conscious of the<br />

difficulties of definition. In his view, the romance deals with<br />

'experience liberated, so to speak, experience disengaged, disembroiled,<br />

disencumbered, exempt from the conditions that we<br />

usually know to attach to it'.^ The novelist knows that 'the<br />

balloon of experience is in fact tied to the earth' and he keeps<br />

it that way, however long his cable may be: but 'the art of the<br />

necromancer is, "for the fun of it", insidiously to cut the cable'.<br />

It says much for the natural imaginative gifts of our earlier<br />

novelists that they kept the cable as long as possible, and sometimes<br />

cut it, in spite of a certain amount of confusion about the<br />

real nature of their 'new species of writing'.<br />

In fact their attempts to understand their new kind, and to<br />

relate it, however mistakenly, to earUer forms of fiction, may<br />

have done much to keep their sense of wonder alive. As long<br />

as they were occupied in sorting out the complicated relationships<br />

connecting their own art to classical epic and heroic or<br />

pastoral romance, they were unlikely to remain completely<br />

insulated from the imaginative appeal of these narratives.<br />

Brooding over the old stories, the eighteenth-century novelist<br />

could however be certain of one thing; whatever the degree of<br />

his personal response to 'the marvellous', his finished work was<br />

concerned, as little previous fiction had been, with 'natural'<br />

behaviour and 'real' people. Sometimes he explained his preference<br />

for this realism on moral grounds. Characters who are<br />

a convincingly natural mixture of good and bad, he argued,<br />

are more likely to provide useful examples than those who are<br />

extraordinarily wicked or virtuous; moreover extravagance of<br />

any kind misleads the reader and unfits him for ordinary life.<br />

Since he was happier with classical support he sometimes tried<br />

to claim a precedent in Greek and Roman epic, but this did<br />

not really fortify his position. For one thing, the behaviour of<br />

the characters in the classical epic did not accord with the<br />

notions which a polite age entertained about the ideal way to<br />

conduct oneself in society. In The History of Sir Charles Grandison<br />

(1754), Richardson makes Lady Charlotte expand his own<br />

^ See below, p. 41. * See below, p. 56.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!