On the Chronicles of Ceylon
A judicious appraisal of the various Chronicles that were written in Sri Lanka, assessing their chronology, literary and historical character.
A judicious appraisal of the various Chronicles that were written in Sri Lanka, assessing their chronology, literary and historical character.
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I. Chonological Position – 35<br />
contained [19] certain legends, however few, which were not to be<br />
found in <strong>the</strong> former. 57 Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> additional matters supplied in <strong>the</strong><br />
Uttaravihāra commentary have been utilized in <strong>the</strong><br />
Mahābodhivaṁsa, <strong>the</strong> Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā and <strong>the</strong> Extended<br />
Mahāvaṁsa.<br />
The Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā presupposes two o<strong>the</strong>r earlier commentaries,<br />
namely, one by Pāsāṇadīpavāsī Upatissa Thera and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r known<br />
as <strong>the</strong> Gaṇṭhipadavaṇṇanā.<br />
6. Mahābodhivaṁsakathā<br />
This is ano<strong>the</strong>r older work which is quoted by name in <strong>the</strong><br />
Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā. The Pali verse which is cited from this work<br />
cannot, however, be traced in <strong>the</strong> Mahābodhivaṁsa edited by Arthur<br />
Strong for <strong>the</strong> Pali Text Society:<br />
Mahābodhiṁ pūjissanti Laṅke’ tasmiṁ narādhipā<br />
paccatthikā na hiṁseyyuṁ esā sambodhidhammatā. 58<br />
By <strong>the</strong> title, Mahābodhivaṁsakathā, Malalasekera rightly<br />
understands a Mahābodhivaṁsa Aṭṭhakathā. 59 The question is – is <strong>the</strong><br />
older work presupposed by <strong>the</strong> Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā to be identified with<br />
<strong>the</strong> Pali version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mahābodhivaṁsa now extant or should it be<br />
identified with its earlier Sinhalese form? There is no consensus <strong>of</strong><br />
opinion as yet on this point. Geiger admits <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work<br />
57 Vaṁsatthappakāsinī, I, pp. 125, 155, 177, 187, 247, 249, 289, 290.<br />
58 Ibid., II, pp. 412.<br />
59 Ibid., II, p. 412.