15.06.2017 Views

On the Chronicles of Ceylon

A judicious appraisal of the various Chronicles that were written in Sri Lanka, assessing their chronology, literary and historical character.

A judicious appraisal of the various Chronicles that were written in Sri Lanka, assessing their chronology, literary and historical character.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I. Chonological Position – 35<br />

contained [19] certain legends, however few, which were not to be<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> former. 57 Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> additional matters supplied in <strong>the</strong><br />

Uttaravihāra commentary have been utilized in <strong>the</strong><br />

Mahābodhivaṁsa, <strong>the</strong> Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā and <strong>the</strong> Extended<br />

Mahāvaṁsa.<br />

The Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā presupposes two o<strong>the</strong>r earlier commentaries,<br />

namely, one by Pāsāṇadīpavāsī Upatissa Thera and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r known<br />

as <strong>the</strong> Gaṇṭhipadavaṇṇanā.<br />

6. Mahābodhivaṁsakathā<br />

This is ano<strong>the</strong>r older work which is quoted by name in <strong>the</strong><br />

Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā. The Pali verse which is cited from this work<br />

cannot, however, be traced in <strong>the</strong> Mahābodhivaṁsa edited by Arthur<br />

Strong for <strong>the</strong> Pali Text Society:<br />

Mahābodhiṁ pūjissanti Laṅke’ tasmiṁ narādhipā<br />

paccatthikā na hiṁseyyuṁ esā sambodhidhammatā. 58<br />

By <strong>the</strong> title, Mahābodhivaṁsakathā, Malalasekera rightly<br />

understands a Mahābodhivaṁsa Aṭṭhakathā. 59 The question is – is <strong>the</strong><br />

older work presupposed by <strong>the</strong> Mahāvaṁsa Ṭīkā to be identified with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Pali version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mahābodhivaṁsa now extant or should it be<br />

identified with its earlier Sinhalese form? There is no consensus <strong>of</strong><br />

opinion as yet on this point. Geiger admits <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work<br />

57 Vaṁsatthappakāsinī, I, pp. 125, 155, 177, 187, 247, 249, 289, 290.<br />

58 Ibid., II, pp. 412.<br />

59 Ibid., II, p. 412.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!