13.12.2012 Views

In this edition: - The European Fruit Magazine

In this edition: - The European Fruit Magazine

In this edition: - The European Fruit Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

G.11 Photo: ACW<br />

22<br />

in 2006. M9T337 showed an average lesion length<br />

of about 65% of the shoots, while the CG rootstocks<br />

were only visibly infested by not more than<br />

5 to 10% of the shoots in average. Rootstocks B9<br />

and P16 were not included in <strong>this</strong> test. According<br />

to information from foreign sources, they showed<br />

susceptibility to fi re blight in artifi cial infection<br />

tests. Though, fi re blight fi eld tests in the USA<br />

with the Gala and Mc<strong>In</strong>tosh varieties indicated<br />

that besides the CG rootstocks G.16, G.41, G.11,<br />

also the B9 shows fi eld-tolerance to fi re blight.<br />

<strong>In</strong> commercial orchards in the USA, these results<br />

appeared to be confi rmed; it was stated that<br />

the the amount of rootstock blight via the scion<br />

variety was signifi cantly lower on B9 rootstock.<br />

That is why B9 is recommended in the USA as a<br />

replacement for M9 in fi re blight areas.<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>In</strong> comparison with other <strong>European</strong> trial results,<br />

the CG rootstocks are more vigorous in the ACW<br />

trials. Vigor of the weakest CG rootstocks, G.41<br />

and G.11 in Wädenswil was comparable to the<br />

growth of M9Pajam2, which is the most vigorous<br />

M9 type, while in other trials the growth of the<br />

G.41 and G.11 lay, with a few deviations, between<br />

the M9T337 and M9 Pajam2. With regard to overall<br />

yield, the G.41 and G.11 performed better in<br />

all the trials than the M9 standard. <strong>The</strong> relative<br />

yield of the named rootstocks is comparable.<br />

Growth and relative yields of the rootstocks B9<br />

and M9T337 were at the same level. For many<br />

years, the B9 has been upheld in Europe as an<br />

alternative to the M9, with growth between the<br />

M9Fleuren56 and the M9T337.<br />

Conclusion and outlook<br />

<strong>The</strong> rootstocks B9, G.11 and G.41 showed the best<br />

agronomical production characteristics in the trials<br />

together with the fi re blight susceptible standard<br />

M9T337. If the fi eld tolerance observed in the<br />

USA with regard to fi re blight will be confi rmed<br />

in future tests carried out by ACW in Swiss commercial<br />

orchards, B9 would be a suitable alternative<br />

for M9. G.11 should be pursued due to its fi re<br />

blight tolerance and its interesting production<br />

characteristics. Unfortunately, G.41 cannot be<br />

propagated well and is therefore not very likely<br />

to establish itself in practice. Larger numbers<br />

of trees with the Braeburn, Gala, Milwa (Diwa®)<br />

and La Flamboyante (Mairac®) apple varieties<br />

on the rootstocks B9 and G.11 will be planted in<br />

spring 2009 in commercial orchard trials in eastern<br />

Switzerland. Currently, we only recommend<br />

these rootstocks for further experimentation on<br />

commercial orchard level. More experience with<br />

regard to their potential for reduction of fi re<br />

blight pressure has to be gathered.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!