13.12.2012 Views

- 1 of 47 - BELGIUM Catherine DELFORGE and Ludivine ...

- 1 of 47 - BELGIUM Catherine DELFORGE and Ludivine ...

- 1 of 47 - BELGIUM Catherine DELFORGE and Ludivine ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

takes possession <strong>of</strong> the apartment. The two contracts are only discovered when T2 wants<br />

to take possession <strong>of</strong> the apartment as well. What are the legal consequences for both<br />

contracts <strong>and</strong> the rights <strong>of</strong> the parties?<br />

This scenario involves a controversy as to which tenant has a superior right to the<br />

property - the tenant whose contract has a prior claim or the tenant who first took possession<br />

<strong>of</strong> the premises? Legal doctrine <strong>and</strong> the courts generally afford preference to the tenant who<br />

took first possession <strong>of</strong> the premise 202 .<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the obligations <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>lord is to guarantee the tenant enjoys the property<br />

unmolested. This is a scenario where this guarantee has not been respected, so the contractual<br />

liability <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>lord is involved 203 .<br />

Question 25: Delayed Completion<br />

L is an investor <strong>and</strong> buys an apartment from a big building company. According to the<br />

contract, the apartment should be ready from 1/1/2003. However, the purchase contract<br />

contains a (lawful) clause according to which the builder is not responsible for delay<br />

unless caused by him. L rents the apartment to T from 17/1/2003 without any special<br />

arrangements in the case <strong>of</strong> delay. However, as the neighbour N challenges, though<br />

unsuccessfully in the end, the building permit granted by the competent authority to B in<br />

an administrative law procedure, the apartment is not available until 1/1/2004. Has T<br />

any claims against L? Has L claims against N?<br />

If L fails to deliver the keys to the premises in time, T must decide whether or not to<br />

make a claim for breach <strong>of</strong> contract <strong>and</strong> damages 204 . Such delays are usually caused by<br />

confusion regarding the moment <strong>of</strong> delivery or are due to a previous tenant's failure to return<br />

the keys/property. In the case <strong>of</strong> a trial, the judge may decide that in bringing the case T has<br />

been overly excessive. L may have a claim against N if it appears that N was at fault in<br />

bringing the claim (on the basis <strong>of</strong> article 1382 <strong>of</strong> the Civil code) or abused L's right to protest<br />

against such a permit. Nevertheless, such cases are rare.<br />

Question 26: State <strong>and</strong> Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the House (Guarantees)<br />

L rents an apartment to T. T wants to diminish the rent because<br />

a) stains <strong>of</strong> mildew have been found in some corners.<br />

Variant 1: By letter, T asks L to renovate the walls affected by mildew within 2 weeks. As<br />

T does not reply, T has the repair done by a specialist <strong>and</strong> wants to <strong>of</strong>f-set the costs from<br />

the monthly rent rates. Is this lawful?<br />

Variant 2: T did not discover the mildew stains when inspecting the house before<br />

entering into the contact, even though these had already been present. Does this<br />

preclude her from claiming a rent reduction?<br />

b) a noisy building site for a big road is opened by the city administration next to the<br />

apartment.<br />

c) the tenants <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring apartment in the house have repeatedly <strong>and</strong> despite<br />

T’s complaints organised loud nightly parties from 11 p.m. to 5 am.<br />

202 B. LOUVEAUX, Le droit du bail - Régime général, Bruxelles, De Boeck, 1993, p. 68.<br />

203 Y. MERCHIERS, Le bail en général, Rép. Not., p. 183.<br />

204 B. LOUVEAUX, Le droit du bail - Régime général, Bruxelles, De Boeck, 1993, p.94.<br />

- 34 <strong>of</strong> <strong>47</strong> -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!