16.01.2018 Views

CCChat-Magazine_5

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CCChat</strong> talks to:<br />

Frank Mullane<br />

CEO, AAFDA<br />

“What needs to happen is that the status of victims and the<br />

families left behind after homicide needs to be raised”<br />

Frank Mullane<br />

Q: In your time working with families<br />

bereaved through homicide, what would<br />

you say has been the most profound<br />

change?<br />

The introduction of victim impact<br />

statements was useful. We have also seen<br />

the appointment of a chief coroner,<br />

statutory domestic homicide reviews, the<br />

Crown Prosecution Service engaging with<br />

victim’s families, and the appointment of a<br />

victims’ commissioner nationally and for<br />

London. Of these, the most profound has<br />

been domestic homicide reviews although<br />

they have a long way to go before looking<br />

like the reviews I want them to be. But the<br />

most profound feeling is that there hasn’t<br />

been enough change! In cases of domestic<br />

homicide, victim’s families sufer a similar<br />

lack of status and power to the victims<br />

themselves, and institutions often consider<br />

their perspective and agenda to be superior<br />

or more well-informed than the victim’s. So<br />

despite signiicant improvements in the last<br />

few years to the way victims’ families are<br />

treated after homicide, and the sensitive<br />

and caring attitude of many professionals<br />

who treat them with the respect and<br />

inclusiveness they deserve, their needs are<br />

still not intrinsically a part of many criminal<br />

justice and other state processes.<br />

And the outcome for many victims and<br />

families is a status gap between them and<br />

those employed to carry out these<br />

processes. As Professor Armour said<br />

“violent death is considered a public issue<br />

where the need for justice takes<br />

precedence over the needs of homicide<br />

families.” (Armour 2002)<br />

Q: What do you think still needs to be<br />

done and how might that be achieved?<br />

Not all agencies commissioning services<br />

understand what families’ needs are after<br />

domestic homicide. Families consistently<br />

say that they need to know facts of the<br />

case and to witness and/or be a part of<br />

change. They need proper advocacy for this<br />

but this is rarely recognised. This does not<br />

have to be a lawyer. Lay advocates who are<br />

expert and specialist can do this. This is<br />

what we do in AAFDA and we have walked<br />

in similar shoes to the people we are<br />

helping. What needs to happen is that the<br />

status of victims and the families left<br />

behind after homicide needs to be raised.<br />

They need to be treated as important and<br />

key stakeholders and to be treated as such.<br />

But the reality is that they are often not<br />

treated this way. Without specialist and<br />

expert advocacy the families will not get<br />

appropriate status. For example, in<br />

domestic homicide reviews, families are<br />

2018 is the Year For Making The Invisible Visible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!