Arkib Negara ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT and archive mgmt guideline_eng
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e-SPARK<br />
The fact that most digital storage devices have only emerged recently, means that the life<br />
expectancy for these devices is largely unproven. Rapid cycles of technological<br />
obsolescence occurring within the IT industry present the possibility that digital storage<br />
devices may well become outmoded, unsupported <strong>and</strong> obsolete due to unavailability of the<br />
software <strong>and</strong> hardware required to access the records stored on them long before the<br />
storage devices themselves physically degrade.<br />
Public offices are therefore advised to be conservative when planning for the refreshment of<br />
storage devices, <strong>and</strong> to err on the side of caution, rather than risk the loss of electronic<br />
records from storage device deterioration. In deciding when to refresh storage devices,<br />
public office staff will need to consider the following factors:<br />
• Vendor claims of storage device life expectancy (preferably supported by evidence from<br />
independent tests).<br />
• Technological advancements that make the current storage device obsolete.<br />
• Ready access to equipment capable of reading <strong>and</strong> rendering the electronic record<br />
contained on the current storage device.<br />
• Relevant st<strong>and</strong>ards (e.g. ISO 18921 on estimating the life expectancy of compact disks<br />
based on the effects of temperature <strong>and</strong> relative humidity).<br />
• The results of ongoing internal storage device integrity checks.<br />
When contemplating refreshing digital storage devices, public offices should consider the<br />
selection criteria for digital storage devices. Where electronic records are transferred to a<br />
new digital storage device, the content, context <strong>and</strong> format of the electronic records<br />
contained on the existing storage device must not be altered as a result of the transfer.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard error checking techniques should be used to assess the quality of the blank<br />
storage device to be used. And after the transfer has been completed (<strong>and</strong> before the source<br />
records are destroyed), spot checks should be undertaken to ensure that the electronic<br />
records have been reliably <strong>and</strong> accurately transferred to the new device. Verification<br />
techniques, such as checksums, should be used to confirm digital record integrity.<br />
After each transfer it is advisable to perform a test restoration of the data to verify the<br />
success of the process <strong>and</strong> ensure that the electronic records are still accessible.<br />
Where digital storage devices are not refreshed in a timely manner there is a significant<br />
chance that the electronic records they contain will become corrupted <strong>and</strong> inaccessible.<br />
Allowing electronic records to become inaccessible may be viewed as a breach of the Akta<br />
<strong>Arkib</strong> <strong>Negara</strong> 2003.<br />
In cases where electronic records cannot be accessed due to the failure or corruption of the<br />
storage device, public offices should seek assistance from commercial data recovery<br />
services <strong>and</strong> take all reasonable steps to recover the electronic records. The feasibility <strong>and</strong><br />
cost of recovering the lost electronic records will depend on the type of digital storage device<br />
used, the level of degradation <strong>and</strong> the complexity of the recovery process required.<br />
Copyright <strong>Arkib</strong> <strong>Negara</strong> Malaysia Page 22 of 86