young-michelle-void-petition
Michelle Young - legal strategy analysis
Michelle Young - legal strategy analysis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
“The above mentioned debt is for a liquidated sum, payable<br />
immediately, and the debtor appears to be unable to pay it”.<br />
a)The imposter <strong>petition</strong>ers, David Ingram and Richard Hicken, did not<br />
supply any evidence, in support of the statement.<br />
b) The statement that the respondent is UNABLE TO PAY was made<br />
with the intent, to obtain a Bankruptcy Order, to deprive the victim,<br />
Michelle Young of her freedom and liberty.<br />
c) Allowing them to take multi million pounds, under the false<br />
authority of the Court.<br />
5) Paragraph 4 in the <strong>petition</strong> stated that the debt is for a liquidated<br />
sum payable immediately and the debtor appears to be unable to<br />
pay. Is that a true statement?