14.12.2012 Views

DYNAMICS and ACTIVE PROCESSES - International Lithosphere ...

DYNAMICS and ACTIVE PROCESSES - International Lithosphere ...

DYNAMICS and ACTIVE PROCESSES - International Lithosphere ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

gneissic) rocks occurred on the northern part of the WGR. The MTFC as discrete sinistral<br />

ENE-WSW steep ductile shear zones (Robinson, 1995) formed probably during the Sc<strong>and</strong>ian<br />

Orogeny towards the end of the Caledonian Cycle, since it slices through several of Sc<strong>and</strong>ian<br />

thrust sheets (Grønlie <strong>and</strong> Roberts 1989). The fault complex has been repeatedly reactivated<br />

in the brittle domain from Devonian time to the Cenozoic (?) <strong>and</strong> exhibits a great variety of<br />

fault rocks, exposed mostly on the Fosen Peninsula (i.e. Verran <strong>and</strong> Hitra-Snåsa faults, Watts<br />

2001 <strong>and</strong> references therein). These comprise mylonites overprinted by recrystallised breccias<br />

with quartz <strong>and</strong> epidote veining, phrenite-matrixed cataclasites, cut by zeolite/calcite veining<br />

associated with brecciation, pseudotachylites <strong>and</strong> zeolite-calcite slickenfibres. The complexity<br />

<strong>and</strong> variety of fault rocks reflects the longevity of the MTFC. The different fault rocks reveal<br />

the strength evolution of the fault complex <strong>and</strong> suggest significant weakening of some of its<br />

segments by repeated reactivation (see discussion in Pascal & Gabrielsen 2001). This applies<br />

to some of the primary segments of the present-day MTFC. Some segments of the southern<br />

onshore MTFC do not display such a cortege of fault rocks <strong>and</strong> exhibit, in turn, a restricted<br />

variety of fault rocks <strong>and</strong> associated mineralogy (Saintot & Pascal 2010). While epidote<br />

which might be the marker of the Devonian deformation, is widespread along the northern<br />

onshore segments of the MTFC, the southern segments are laumontite-rich <strong>and</strong> hence, are<br />

believed to represent the latest propagation (presumably Late Jurassic) <strong>and</strong> widening of the<br />

MTFC.<br />

Structural mapping in combination with analytical dating techniques have revealed three main<br />

phases of activity along the MTFC (Grønlie & Roberts 1989, Séranne 1992, Sherlock et al.<br />

2004): (1) Early Devonian sinistral strike-slip characterised by semi-ductile deformation, (2)<br />

Early Permian sinistral transtension <strong>and</strong> (3) Late Jurassic (to Early Cretaceous?) normal dipslip<br />

to dextral strike-slip. Normal dip-slip reactivation of the MTFC is assumed to have<br />

occurred in Cenozoic times (Redfield et al. 2005) but to date no clear evidence has been found<br />

yet. The three first phases of fault activity reflect, respectively (Gabrielsen et al. 1999): (1) the<br />

collapse of the Caledonian mountain chain, (2) widespread Permian rifting <strong>and</strong> (3) Late<br />

Jurassic rifting of the northern North Sea <strong>and</strong> the Mid-Norwegian margin. The MTFC appears<br />

to have exerted a strong influence on the evolution of the offshore basins, in particular in<br />

controlling their structural <strong>and</strong> depositional styles though time (Osmundsen et al. 2006). The<br />

fourth phase of activity of the fault complex was linked to the postulated uplift of the<br />

Norwegian mountains while the offshore basins were subsiding in Cenozoic times (Redfield<br />

et al. 2005). The MTFC appears to have strongly controlled the evolution of the l<strong>and</strong>scape<br />

onshore, including the creation of preferential pathways for Quaternary glaciers. The MTFC<br />

is still seismically active today (Olesen et al. 2004). By means of numerical modelling, Pascal<br />

& Gabrielsen (2001) suggested that it acts as a very weak zone, resulting in disparate stress<br />

patterns to the north <strong>and</strong> south. Recent observations of stress-induced features <strong>and</strong> in-situ<br />

stress measurements support the modelling results (Roberts & Myrvang 2004).<br />

Little is known about the deep structure (e.g. dip directions of the faults), the links with the<br />

offshore fault segments <strong>and</strong> the precise kinematics <strong>and</strong> segmentation of the whole MTFC. The<br />

aims of the ongoing “MTFC integrated” project are (1) to reveal the deep structure of the<br />

MTFC using geophysical methods, (2) to investigate its offshore prolongation <strong>and</strong> (3) to study<br />

its kinematics <strong>and</strong> structural evolution. We use a large panel of geophysical methods,<br />

including gravimetry, magnetic profiling, shallow EM methods <strong>and</strong> seismic<br />

reflection/refraction profiles constrained by petrophysical sampling <strong>and</strong> structural<br />

observations. Our geophysical observations <strong>and</strong> experiments show that the MTFC onshore<br />

bounds a major horst structure similar to the ones evidenced by long-range seismic profiling<br />

offshore (Lundberg et al. 2009). Analysis of regional magnetic <strong>and</strong> gravity analysis allows for<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!