The Gift of Introversion
The Gift of Introversion
The Gift of Introversion
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
If you act to overcome your weakness,<br />
then your weakness will become your strength!<br />
- author unknown<br />
Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation, Inc.<br />
Helping Individuals, Organizations & Communities<br />
Achieve <strong>The</strong>ir Full Potential<br />
Since its founding in 2003, <strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation has become recognized as an effective<br />
provider <strong>of</strong> support to those who receive our services, having real impact within the communities<br />
we serve. We are currently engaged in community and faith-based collaborative initiatives,<br />
having the overall objective <strong>of</strong> eradicating all forms <strong>of</strong> youth violence and correcting injustices<br />
everywhere. In carrying-out these initiatives, we have adopted the evidence-based strategic<br />
framework developed and implemented by the Office <strong>of</strong> Juvenile Justice & Delinquency<br />
Prevention (OJJDP).<br />
<strong>The</strong> stated objectives are:<br />
1. Community Mobilization;<br />
2. Social Intervention;<br />
3. Provision <strong>of</strong> Opportunities;<br />
4. Organizational Change and Development;<br />
5. Suppression [<strong>of</strong> illegal activities].<br />
Moreover, it is our most fundamental belief that in order to be effective, prevention and<br />
intervention strategies must be Community Specific, Culturally Relevant, Evidence-Based, and<br />
Collaborative. <strong>The</strong> Violence Prevention and Intervention programming we employ in<br />
implementing this community-enhancing framework include the programs further described<br />
throughout our publications, programs and special projects both domestically and<br />
internationally.<br />
www.<strong>The</strong>Advocacy.Foundation<br />
ISBN: ......... ../2017<br />
......... Printed in the USA<br />
Advocacy Foundation Publishers<br />
Philadlephia, PA<br />
(878) 222-0450 | Voice | Data | SMS<br />
Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 160
Dedication<br />
______<br />
Every publication in our many series’ is dedicated to everyone, absolutely everyone, who by<br />
virtue <strong>of</strong> their calling and by Divine inspiration, direction and guidance, is on the battlefield dayafter-day<br />
striving to follow God’s will and purpose for their lives. And this is with particular affinity<br />
for those Spiritual warriors who are being transformed into excellence through daily academic,<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional, familial, and other challenges.<br />
We pray that you will bear in mind:<br />
Matthew 19:26 (NIV)<br />
Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible,<br />
but with God all things are possible." (Emphasis added)<br />
To all <strong>of</strong> us who daily look past our circumstances, and naysayers, to what the Lord says we will<br />
accomplish:<br />
Blessings!!<br />
- <strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation, Inc.<br />
Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> Transformative Justice Project<br />
Eradicating Juvenile Delinquency Requires a Multi-Disciplinary Approach<br />
<strong>The</strong> way we accomplish all this is a follows:<br />
<strong>The</strong> Juvenile Justice system is incredibly overloaded, and<br />
Solutions-Based programs are woefully underfunded. Our<br />
precious children, therefore, particularly young people <strong>of</strong><br />
color, <strong>of</strong>ten get the “swift” version <strong>of</strong> justice whenever they<br />
come into contact with the law.<br />
Decisions to build prison facilities are <strong>of</strong>ten based on<br />
elementary school test results, and our country incarcerates<br />
more <strong>of</strong> its young than any other nation on earth. So we at<br />
<strong>The</strong> Foundation labor to pull our young people out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“school to prison” pipeline, and we then coordinate the efforts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the legal, psychological, governmental and educational<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals needed to bring an end to delinquency.<br />
We also educate families, police, local businesses, elected<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials, clergy, and schools and other stakeholders about<br />
transforming whole communities, and we labor to change<br />
their thinking about the causes <strong>of</strong> delinquency with the goal<br />
<strong>of</strong> helping them embrace the idea <strong>of</strong> restoration for the young<br />
people in our care who demonstrate repentance for their<br />
mistakes.<br />
1. We vigorously advocate for charges reductions, wherever possible, in the adjudicatory (court)<br />
process, with the ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> expungement or pardon, in order to maximize the chances for<br />
our clients to graduate high school and progress into college, military service or the workforce<br />
without the stigma <strong>of</strong> a criminal record;<br />
2. We then enroll each young person into an Evidence-Based, Data-Driven Restorative Justice<br />
program designed to facilitate their rehabilitation and subsequent reintegration back into the<br />
community;<br />
3. While those projects are operating, we conduct a wide variety <strong>of</strong> ComeUnity-ReEngineering<br />
seminars and workshops on topics ranging from Juvenile Justice to Parental Rights, to Domestic<br />
issues to Police friendly contacts, to CBO and FBO accountability and compliance;<br />
4. Throughout the process, we encourage and maintain frequent personal contact between all<br />
parties;<br />
5 Throughout the process we conduct a continuum <strong>of</strong> events and fundraisers designed to facilitate<br />
collaboration among pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and community stakeholders; and finally<br />
Page 7 <strong>of</strong> 160
6. 1 We disseminate Quarterly publications, like our e-Advocate series Newsletter and our e-Advocate<br />
Quarterly electronic Magazine to all regular donors in order to facilitate a lifelong learning process<br />
on the ever-evolving developments in the Justice system.<br />
And in addition to the help we provide for our young clients and their families, we also facilitate<br />
Community Engagement through the Restorative Justice process, thereby balancing the interesrs<br />
<strong>of</strong> local businesses, schools, clergy, elected <strong>of</strong>ficials, police, and all interested stakeholders. Through<br />
these efforts, relationships are rebuilt & strengthened, local businesses and communities are enhanced &<br />
protected from victimization, young careers are developed, and our precious young people are kept out<br />
<strong>of</strong> the prison pipeline.<br />
This is a massive undertaking, and we need all the help and financial support you can give! We plan to<br />
help 75 young persons per quarter-year (aggregating to a total <strong>of</strong> 250 per year) in each jurisdiction we<br />
serve) at an average cost <strong>of</strong> under $2,500 per client, per year.*<br />
Thank you in advance for your support!<br />
* FYI:<br />
1. <strong>The</strong> national average cost to taxpayers for minimum-security youth incarceration, is around<br />
$43,000.00 per child, per year.<br />
2. <strong>The</strong> average annual cost to taxpayers for maximun-security youth incarceration is well over<br />
$148,000.00 per child, per year.<br />
- (US News and World Report, December 9, 2014);<br />
3. In every jurisdiction in the nation, the Plea Bargain rate is above 99%.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Judicial system engages in a tri-partite balancing task in every single one <strong>of</strong> these matters, seeking<br />
to balance Rehabilitative Justice with Community Protection and Judicial Economy, and, although<br />
the practitioners work very hard to achieve positive outcomes, the scales are nowhere near balanced<br />
where people <strong>of</strong> color are involved.<br />
We must reverse this trend, which is right now working very much against the best interests <strong>of</strong> our young.<br />
Our young people do not belong behind bars.<br />
- Jack Johnson<br />
1<br />
In addition to supporting our world-class programming and support services, all regular donors receive our Quarterly e-Newsletter<br />
(<strong>The</strong> e-Advocate), as well as <strong>The</strong> e-Advocate Quarterly Magazine.<br />
Page 8 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation, Inc.<br />
Helping Individuals, Organizations & Communities<br />
Achieve <strong>The</strong>ir Full Potential<br />
…a collection <strong>of</strong> works on<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Introversion</strong><br />
“Turning the Improbable Into the Exceptional”<br />
Atlanta<br />
Philadelphia<br />
______<br />
John C Johnson III<br />
Founder & CEO<br />
(878) 222-0450<br />
Voice | Data | SMS<br />
www.<strong>The</strong>Advocacy.Foundation<br />
Page 9 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 10 <strong>of</strong> 160
Biblical Authority<br />
______<br />
2 Timothy 1:7 (NIV) 7 For the Spirit God gave us does not make us timid, but gives us<br />
power, love and self-discipline.<br />
Joshua 1:9 9 Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid; do<br />
not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go.”<br />
Isaiah 43:1 - Israel’s Only Savior<br />
1<br />
But now, this is what the Lord says—he who<br />
created you, Jacob, he who formed you, Israel: “Do not fear, for I have redeemed you; I have<br />
summoned you by name; you are mine.<br />
Psalm 27:14 14 Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord.<br />
Romans 8:31 - More Than Conquerors 31 What, then, shall we say in response to<br />
these things? If God is for us,who can be against us?<br />
Hebrews 13:6 6 So we say with confidence, “<strong>The</strong> Lord is my helper; I will not be afraid.<br />
What can mere mortals do to me?”<br />
Acts 1:8 8 But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my<br />
witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends <strong>of</strong> the earth.”<br />
1 Peter 3:15 15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an<br />
answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hopethat you have. But do this with<br />
gentleness and respect,<br />
Page 11 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 12 <strong>of</strong> 160
Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />
…a compilation <strong>of</strong> works on<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Introversion</strong><br />
Biblical Authority<br />
I. Introduction: <strong>Introversion</strong> ………………………………….. 15<br />
II. <strong>The</strong> Big Five Personality Traits……………………………. 21<br />
III. Myers-Briggs Indicators……………………………………. 53<br />
IV. <strong>Introversion</strong> vs. Extroversion………………………………. 77<br />
V. Social Anxiety……………………………………………….. 93<br />
VI. How to Thrive As An Introvert…………………………….. 101<br />
VII. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Introversion</strong>.…………………………………… 117<br />
VIII. Famous Introverts…………………………………………. 121<br />
IX. References…………………………………………………. 127<br />
______<br />
Attachments<br />
A. Quiet Quiz: Are You An Introvert or An Extrovert?<br />
B. Introverts vs. Extroverts: Is <strong>The</strong>re an IT Personality?<br />
C. <strong>The</strong> Power <strong>of</strong> Introverts: 9 Best-Loved Stories<br />
Copyright © 2018 <strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.<br />
Page 13 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 14 <strong>of</strong> 160
I. Introduction<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong><br />
Definition<br />
1<br />
Something (such as the retractile proboscis <strong>of</strong> some worms) that is or<br />
can be drawn in especially by invagination<br />
2<br />
One whose personality is characterized by introversion; especially : a<br />
reserved or shy person who enjoys spending time alone<br />
<br />
His research further shows that about 70% <strong>of</strong> top executives<br />
are introverts.<br />
o<br />
- Linda Grant<br />
________<br />
What Are Common <strong>Introversion</strong> Traits?<br />
Learn about Introvert's Personality Traits<br />
by Kendra Cherry<br />
Updated April 30, 2018<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> the major personality traits identified in many theories <strong>of</strong><br />
personality. People who are introverted tend to be inward turning, or focused more on<br />
internal thoughts, feelings and moods rather than seeking out external stimulation.<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong> is generally<br />
viewed as existing as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />
continuum along with extraversion.<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong> indicates<br />
one end <strong>of</strong> the scale, while<br />
extraversion<br />
represents the other end.<br />
An Overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Psychology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> terms introversion and<br />
extraversion<br />
were popularized through<br />
the work <strong>of</strong> Carl Jung and later<br />
became central parts <strong>of</strong> other prominent<br />
theories including the big 5 theory <strong>of</strong><br />
personality. <strong>The</strong> introversion-<br />
extraversion dimension is also<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the four areas identified by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).<br />
According to many theories <strong>of</strong> personality, everyone has some degree <strong>of</strong> both<br />
introversion and extraversion. However, people <strong>of</strong>ten tend to lean one way or the other.<br />
Page 15 <strong>of</strong> 160
Introverts tend to be more quiet, reserved, and introspective. Unlike extroverts who gain<br />
energy from social interaction, introverts have to expend energy in social situations.<br />
After attending a party or spending time in a large group <strong>of</strong> people, introverts <strong>of</strong>ten feel<br />
a need to "recharge" by spending a period <strong>of</strong> time alone.<br />
Common <strong>Introversion</strong> Traits<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong> is marked by a number <strong>of</strong> sub-traits:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Very self-aware<br />
Thoughtful<br />
Enjoys understanding details<br />
Interested in self-knowledge and self-understanding<br />
Tends to keep emotions private<br />
Quiet and reserved in large groups or around unfamiliar people<br />
More sociable and gregarious around people they know well<br />
Learns well through observation<br />
How Does <strong>Introversion</strong> Influence Behavior?<br />
How does introversion impact behavior?<br />
One important thing to remember is that not all introverts are the same. Some people<br />
might be very introverted, others only a little, or somewhere in between.<br />
Some ways that introversion might influence behavior include the following:<br />
Introverts may have fewer, closer friends.<br />
Researchers have found that people high in this trait tend to have a smaller group <strong>of</strong><br />
friends. While extroverts generally have a wide circle <strong>of</strong> friends and acquaintances,<br />
introverts typically choose their friends much more carefully. <strong>The</strong>ir closest relationships<br />
tend to be pr<strong>of</strong>ound and significant. <strong>The</strong>y also prefer to interact with people on a oneon-one<br />
basis rather than in a large group setting.<br />
Introverts may be reserved, but it does not mean they are necessarily shy or<br />
socially anxious.<br />
It is important to note that introversion does not necessarily equate with shyness. In<br />
their book, <strong>The</strong> Development <strong>of</strong> Shyness and Social Withdrawal, authors Schmidt and<br />
Buss write, "Sociability refers to the motive, strong or weak, <strong>of</strong> wanting to be with others,<br />
whereas shyness refers to behavior when with others, inhibited or uninhibited, as well<br />
as feelings <strong>of</strong> tension and discomfort."<br />
Shyness indicates a fear <strong>of</strong> people or social situations.<br />
Page 16 <strong>of</strong> 160
Introverts, on the other hand, <strong>of</strong>ten find interacting with other people draining. However,<br />
they do appreciate being around people to whom they are close. <strong>The</strong>y find engaging in<br />
"small talk" tedious, but do enjoy having deep, meaningful conversations.<br />
Introverts tend to think about things before talking.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y want to have a full understanding <strong>of</strong> a concept before they voice an opinion or try<br />
to <strong>of</strong>fer an explanation. While extroverts typically learn through trial and error, introverts<br />
learn best through observation.<br />
Myths and Misconceptions About <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
In an excellent article in Atlantic Monthly, author Jonathan Rauch took on some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
common myths and misconceptions about introverts.<br />
While introverts are <strong>of</strong>ten labeled as shy, alo<strong>of</strong>, and arrogant, Rauch explains that these<br />
perceptions result from the failure <strong>of</strong> extroverts to understand how introverts function.<br />
"Extr[a]verts have little or no grasp <strong>of</strong> introversion," Rauch suggests. "<strong>The</strong>y assume that<br />
company, especially their own, is always welcome. <strong>The</strong>y cannot imagine why someone<br />
Page 17 <strong>of</strong> 160
would need to be alone; indeed, they <strong>of</strong>ten take umbrage at the suggestion. As <strong>of</strong>ten as<br />
I have tried to explain the matter to extr[a]verts, I have never sensed that any <strong>of</strong> them<br />
really understood."<br />
According to estimates, extraverts outnumber introverts by about three to one. Introverts<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten find that other people try to change them or even suggest that there is something<br />
"wrong" with them. Nothing could be further from the truth. While introverts make up a<br />
smaller portion <strong>of</strong> the population, there is no right or wrong personality type. Instead,<br />
both introverts and extroverts should strive to understand each other's differences and<br />
similarities.<br />
As you might imagine, jobs that require a great deal <strong>of</strong> social interaction usually hold<br />
little appeal to people high in introversion. On the other hand, careers that involve<br />
working independently are <strong>of</strong>ten a great choice for introverts. For example, an introvert<br />
might enjoy working as a writer, accountant, computer programmer, graphic designer,<br />
pharmacist, or artist.<br />
________<br />
So Apparently <strong>The</strong>re Are 4 Kinds <strong>of</strong> <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
by Melissa Dahl<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong>, thanks largely to Susan Cain's 2012 best seller Quiet, is having something<br />
<strong>of</strong> a cultural moment. Once a mostly misunderstood personality trait — and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
considered a behavioral defect when it was considered at all — it's now the subject <strong>of</strong><br />
countless other books and online listicles (and, more recently, parodies <strong>of</strong> listicles). And<br />
as more regular, non-scientist types started to talk about introversion, psychologist<br />
Jonathan Cheek began to notice something: <strong>The</strong> way many introverts defined the trait<br />
was different from the way he and most <strong>of</strong> his academic colleagues did.<br />
"When you survey a person on the street, asking them to define introversion, what comes<br />
up as the prototypical characteristics are things like thoughtful or introspective,"<br />
said Cheek, a psychology pr<strong>of</strong>essor at Wellesley College. And yet neither <strong>of</strong> these<br />
things are part <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong> the trait according to scientific literature. In the bulk <strong>of</strong><br />
the research on personality psychology, introversion is usually defined by what it<br />
is not: extroversion. If extroverts are assertive and enthusiastic individuals who thrive in<br />
highly stimulative social environments, then introverts are the opposite. End <strong>of</strong> list. What<br />
introverts think about it doesn't really factor in.<br />
This is actually a problem that was identified at least as early as 1980, when<br />
one study found that the "scientific" and "common-sense" definitions <strong>of</strong> introversion<br />
didn't quite match up. And the more Cheek and his colleagues, including graduate<br />
students Jennifer Grimes and Courtney Brown, thought about it, and the more selfdescribed<br />
introverts they interviewed, the less correct this one-size-fits-all definition<br />
seemed. <strong>The</strong>re's not just one way to be an introvert, Cheek now argues — rather, there<br />
Page 18 <strong>of</strong> 160
are four shades <strong>of</strong> introversion: social, thinking, anxious, and restrained. And many<br />
introverts are a mix <strong>of</strong> all four types, rather than demonstrating one type over the others.<br />
(Scroll to the bottom for a quiz to find out your own type.)<br />
Taken together, the first letter <strong>of</strong> the four types spells out STAR, which is what Cheek<br />
named his model. He designed it by surveying about 500 adults, ranging in age from 18<br />
to 70, asking them about things like their preference for solitude, or how inclined they<br />
are to daydream. <strong>The</strong> uniting principle <strong>of</strong> all four kinds is, <strong>of</strong> course, a tendency to turn<br />
inward rather than outward — but beyond that, it gets more complicated.<br />
Here's a brief description <strong>of</strong> each:<br />
Social: Social introversion is the closest to the commonly held understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
introversion, in that it's a preference for socializing with small groups instead <strong>of</strong> large<br />
ones. Or sometimes, it's a preference for no group at all — solitude is <strong>of</strong>ten preferable<br />
for those who score high in social introversion. "<strong>The</strong>y prefer to stay home with a book or<br />
a computer, or to stick to small gatherings with close friends, as opposed to attending<br />
large parties with many strangers," Cheek said. But it's different from shyness, in that<br />
there's no anxiety driving the preference for solitude or small groups.<br />
Thinking; Thinking introversion is a newer concept. People with high levels <strong>of</strong> thinking<br />
introversion don't share the aversion to social events people usually associate with<br />
introversion. Instead, they're introspective, thoughtful, and self-reflective. "You're<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> getting lost in an internal fantasy world," Cheek said. "But it's not in a<br />
neurotic way, it's in an imaginative and creative way." Think the dreamily imaginative<br />
Page 19 <strong>of</strong> 160
Luna Lovegood, not the socially awkward Neville Longbottom, Cheek said, putting it<br />
into Harry Potter terms I, for one, am deeply familiar with.<br />
Anxious: Unlike social introverts, anxious introverts may seek out solitude because<br />
they feel awkward and painfully self-conscious around other people, because they're not<br />
very confident in their own social skills. But, <strong>of</strong>ten, their anxiety doesn't fade when<br />
they're all alone. This kind <strong>of</strong> introversion is defined by a tendency to ruminate, to turn<br />
over and over in their minds the things that might or could or already have gone terribly<br />
wrong.<br />
Restrained: Another word for this one is reserved. Restrained introverts sometimes<br />
seem to operate at a slightly slower pace, preferring to think before they speak or act.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y also might take a while to get going — they can't, for instance, wake up and<br />
immediately spring into action. Haruki Murakami's What I Talk About When I Talk About<br />
Running contains a passage that I think neatly illustrates the restrained introverts, when<br />
he discusses how it takes his muscles a while to warm up when he starts to run. "When<br />
I put on my jogging shoes in the morning and set out, my feet are so heavy it feels like<br />
I'll never get them moving," he writes. He says it's the way his mind works, too: slow to<br />
get going. Murakami, I would bet, is a restrained introvert.<br />
So far, Cheek's model <strong>of</strong> the "four meanings <strong>of</strong> introversion" is just a working paper. But<br />
many psychologists I spoke to, such as Scott Barry Kaufman, scientific director <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Imagination Institute at UPenn's Positive Psychology Center, think it's an important step<br />
forward in expanding the meaning <strong>of</strong> introversion. "I do think it's best to talk about<br />
different types <strong>of</strong> introversion rather than lump all <strong>of</strong> its aspects together under a single<br />
umbrella," he said. Kaufman has written about Cheek's model for Scientific American,<br />
and also used it as part <strong>of</strong> a basis for a new test measuring introversion for the Quiet<br />
Revolution, a kind <strong>of</strong> for-introverts/by-introverts website launched earlier this month<br />
by Quiet author Susan Cain. "Even people who do understand introversion still imagine<br />
that it's really just about, Would you rather be on your own or with a close friend?" Cain<br />
told me. "In fact, there's so much more than that."<br />
Instead <strong>of</strong> working to correct the public's perception <strong>of</strong> the word, Cheek is essentially<br />
seeking to transform the way personality scientists think <strong>of</strong> the trait, by expanding the<br />
definition. "Many people do not feel identified or understood just by the<br />
label introversion as it's used in the culture or by psychologists. It doesn't do the job — it<br />
helps a little bit, but it just doesn't get you very far," Cheek said. "It turns out to be more<br />
<strong>of</strong> a beginning."<br />
Page 20 <strong>of</strong> 160
II. <strong>The</strong> Big Five Personality Traits<br />
<strong>The</strong> Big Five personality traits, also known as the five factor model (FFM), is a<br />
model based on common language descriptors <strong>of</strong> personality. When factor analysis (a<br />
statistical technique) is applied to personality survey data, some words used to describe<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> personality are <strong>of</strong>ten applied to the same person. For example, someone<br />
described as conscientious is more likely to be described as "always prepared" rather<br />
than "messy". This theory is based therefore on the association between words but not<br />
on neuropsychological experiments. This theory uses descriptors <strong>of</strong> common language<br />
and therefore suggests five broad dimensions commonly used to describe the<br />
human personality and psyche. <strong>The</strong> five factors have been defined as openness to<br />
experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
represented by the acronyms OCEAN or CANOE. Beneath each proposed global<br />
factor, there are a number <strong>of</strong> correlated and more specific primary factors. For example,<br />
extraversion is said to include such related qualities as gregariousness, assertiveness,<br />
excitement seeking, warmth, activity, and positive emotions.<br />
That these underlying factors can be found is consistent with the lexical hypothesis:<br />
personality characteristics that are most important in peoples' lives will eventually<br />
become a part <strong>of</strong> their language and, secondly, that more important personality<br />
characteristics are more likely to be encoded into language as a single word.<br />
<strong>The</strong> five factors are:<br />
Page 21 <strong>of</strong> 160
Openness to Experience (Inventive/Curious vs. Consistent/Cautious):<br />
Appreciation for art, emotion, adventure, unusual ideas, curiosity, and variety <strong>of</strong><br />
experience. Openness reflects the degree <strong>of</strong> intellectual curiosity, creativity and a<br />
preference for novelty and variety a person has. It is also described as the extent<br />
to which a person is imaginative or independent and depicts a personal<br />
preference for a variety <strong>of</strong> activities over a strict routine. High openness can be<br />
perceived as unpredictability or lack <strong>of</strong> focus, and more likely to engage in risky<br />
behaviour or drug taking. Also, individuals that have high openness tend to lean<br />
towards being artists or writers in regards to being creative and appreciate <strong>of</strong> the<br />
significance <strong>of</strong> the intellectual and artistic pursuits. Moreover, individuals with<br />
high openness are said to pursue self-actualization specifically by seeking out<br />
intense, euphoric experiences. Conversely, those with low openness seek to gain<br />
fulfillment through perseverance and are characterized as pragmatic and datadriven—sometimes<br />
even perceived to be dogmatic and closed-minded. Some<br />
disagreement remains about how to interpret and contextualize the openness<br />
factor.<br />
[clarification needed]<br />
<br />
Conscientiousness (Efficient/Organized vs. Easy-Going/Careless):<br />
A tendency to be organized and dependable, show self-discipline, act dutifully,<br />
aim for achievement, and prefer planned rather than spontaneous behavior. High<br />
conscientiousness is <strong>of</strong>ten perceived as stubbornness and obsession. Low<br />
conscientiousness is associated with flexibility and spontaneity, but can also<br />
appear as sloppiness and lack <strong>of</strong> reliability.<br />
<br />
Extraversion (Outgoing/Energetic vs. Solitary/Reserved):<br />
Energy, positive emotions, surgency, assertiveness, sociability and the tendency<br />
to seek stimulation in the company <strong>of</strong> others, and talkativeness. High<br />
extraversion is <strong>of</strong>ten perceived as attention-seeking and domineering. Low<br />
extraversion causes a reserved, reflective personality, which can be perceived as<br />
alo<strong>of</strong> or self-absorbed. Extroverted people tend to be more dominant in social<br />
settings, opposed to introverted people who may act more shy and reserved in<br />
this setting.<br />
<br />
Agreeableness (Friendly/Compassionate vs. Challenging/Detached):<br />
A tendency to be compassionate and cooperative rather<br />
than suspicious and antagonistic towards others. It is also a measure <strong>of</strong> one's<br />
trusting and helpful nature, and whether a person is generally well-tempered or<br />
not. High agreeableness is <strong>of</strong>ten seen as naive or submissive. Low<br />
agreeableness personalities are <strong>of</strong>ten competitive or challenging people, which<br />
can be seen as argumentative or untrustworthy. [6]<br />
<br />
Neuroticism (Sensitive/Nervous vs. Secure/Confident):<br />
Page 22 <strong>of</strong> 160
Neuroticism identifies certain people who are more prone to psychological<br />
stress. <strong>The</strong> tendency to experience unpleasant emotions easily, such<br />
as anger, anxiety, depression, and vulnerability. Neuroticism also refers to the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> emotional stability and impulse control and is sometimes referred to by<br />
its low pole, "emotional stability". A high stability manifests itself as a stable and<br />
calm personality, but can be seen as uninspiring and unconcerned. A low stability<br />
expresses as a reactive and excitable personality, <strong>of</strong>ten very dynamic individuals,<br />
but they can be perceived as unstable or insecure. It has also been researched<br />
that individuals with higher levels <strong>of</strong> tested neuroticism tend to have worse<br />
psychological well being.<br />
People who do not exhibit a clear tendency<br />
specific characteristics chosen from the abovementioned<br />
related pairs in all five dimensions are<br />
considered adaptable, moderate and<br />
towards<br />
reasonable personalities, but can be perceived as unprincipled, inscrutable and<br />
calculating.<br />
Overview<br />
<strong>The</strong> Big Five personality traits was the model to comprehend the relationship between<br />
personality and academic behaviors. This model was defined by several independent<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> researchers. <strong>The</strong>se researchers began by studying relationships between a<br />
large number <strong>of</strong> known personality traits. <strong>The</strong>y reduced the lists <strong>of</strong> these traits<br />
(arbitrarily) by 5–10 fold and then used factor analysis to group the remaining traits<br />
(using data mostly based upon people's estimations, in self-report questionnaire and<br />
peer ratings) in order to find the underlying factors <strong>of</strong> personality.<br />
<strong>The</strong> initial model was advanced by Ernest Tupes and Raymond Christal in 1961, but<br />
failed to reach an academic audience until the 1980s. In 1990, J.M. Digman advanced<br />
his five-factor model <strong>of</strong> personality, which Lewis Goldberg extended to the highest level<br />
Page 23 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>of</strong> organization. <strong>The</strong>se five overarching domains have been found to contain and<br />
subsume most known personality traits and are assumed to represent the basic<br />
structure behind all personality traits.<br />
At least four sets <strong>of</strong> researchers have worked independently for decades on this<br />
problem and have identified generally the same five factors: Tupes and Christal were<br />
first, followed by Goldberg at the Oregon Research Institute, Cattell at the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Illinois, and Costa and McCrae at the National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health. <strong>The</strong>se four sets <strong>of</strong><br />
researchers used somewhat different methods in finding the five traits, and thus each<br />
set <strong>of</strong> five factors has somewhat different names and definitions. However, all have<br />
been found to be highly inter-correlated and factor-analytically aligned. Studies indicate<br />
that the Big Five traits are not nearly as powerful in predicting and explaining actual<br />
behavior as are the more numerous facets or primary traits.<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> the Big Five personality traits contains two separate, but correlated, aspects<br />
reflecting a level <strong>of</strong> personality below the broad domains but above the many facet<br />
scales that are also part <strong>of</strong> the Big Five. <strong>The</strong> aspects are labeled as follows: Volatility<br />
and Withdrawal for Neuroticism; Enthusiasm and Assertiveness for Extraversion;<br />
Intellect and Openness for Openness to Experience; Industriousness and Orderliness<br />
for Conscientiousness; and Compassion and Politeness for Agreeableness.<br />
Openness to Experience<br />
Descriptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Particular Personality Traits<br />
Openness is a general appreciation for art, emotion, adventure, unusual ideas,<br />
imagination, curiosity, and variety <strong>of</strong> experience. People who are open to experience<br />
are intellectually curious, open to emotion, sensitive to beauty and willing to try new<br />
things. <strong>The</strong>y tend to be, when compared to closed people, more creative and more<br />
aware <strong>of</strong> their feelings. <strong>The</strong>y are also more likely to hold unconventional beliefs.<br />
A particular individual, however, may have a high overall openness score and be<br />
interested in learning and exploring new cultures but have no great interest in art or<br />
poetry.<br />
Sample Items<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I have excellent ideas.<br />
I am quick to understand things.<br />
I use difficult words.<br />
I am full <strong>of</strong> ideas.<br />
I am not interested in abstractions. (reversed)<br />
I do not have a good imagination. (reversed)<br />
I have difficulty understanding abstract ideas. (reversed)<br />
Conscientiousness<br />
Page 24 <strong>of</strong> 160
Conscientiousness is a tendency to display self-discipline, act dutifully, and strive for<br />
achievement against measures or outside expectations. It is related to the way in which<br />
people control, regulate, and direct their impulses. High scores on conscientiousness<br />
indicate a preference for planned rather than spontaneous behavior. <strong>The</strong> average level<br />
<strong>of</strong> conscientiousness rises among young adults and then declines among older adults.<br />
Sample Items<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I am always prepared.<br />
I pay attention to details.<br />
I get chores done right away.<br />
I like order.<br />
I follow a schedule.<br />
I am exacting in my work.<br />
I leave my belongings around. (reversed)<br />
I make a mess <strong>of</strong> things. (reversed)<br />
I <strong>of</strong>ten forget to put things back in their proper place. (reversed)<br />
I shirk my duties. (reversed)<br />
Extraversion<br />
Extraversion is characterized by breadth <strong>of</strong> activities (as opposed to<br />
depth), surgency from external activity/situations, and energy creation from external<br />
Page 25 <strong>of</strong> 160
means. <strong>The</strong> trait is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world.<br />
Extraverts enjoy interacting with people, and are <strong>of</strong>ten perceived as full <strong>of</strong> energy. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
tend to be enthusiastic, action-oriented individuals. <strong>The</strong>y possess high group visibility,<br />
like to talk, and assert themselves.<br />
Introverts have lower social engagement and energy levels than extraverts. <strong>The</strong>y tend<br />
to seem quiet, low-key, deliberate, and less involved in the social world. <strong>The</strong>ir lack <strong>of</strong><br />
social involvement should not be interpreted as shyness or depression; instead they are<br />
more independent <strong>of</strong> their social world than extraverts. Introverts need less stimulation<br />
than extraverts and more time alone. This does not mean that they are unfriendly or<br />
antisocial; rather, they are reserved in social situations.<br />
Generally, people are a combination <strong>of</strong> extraversion and introversion, with personality<br />
psychologist Eysenck suggesting that these traits are connected somehow to our<br />
central nervous system<br />
Sample Items<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I am the life <strong>of</strong> the party.<br />
I don't mind being the center <strong>of</strong> attention.<br />
I feel comfortable around people.<br />
I start conversations.<br />
I talk to a lot <strong>of</strong> different people at parties.<br />
I don't talk a lot. (reversed)<br />
I think a lot before I speak or act. (reversed)<br />
I don't like to draw attention to myself. (reversed)<br />
I am quiet around strangers. (reversed)<br />
I have no intention <strong>of</strong> talking in large crowds. (reversed)<br />
Agreeableness<br />
<strong>The</strong> agreeableness trait reflects individual differences in general concern for social<br />
harmony. Agreeable individuals value getting along with others. <strong>The</strong>y are generally<br />
considerate, kind, generous, trusting and trustworthy, helpful, and willing to compromise<br />
their interests with others. Agreeable people also have an optimistic view <strong>of</strong> human<br />
nature.<br />
Disagreeable individuals place self-interest above getting along with others. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />
generally unconcerned with others' well-being, and are less likely to extend themselves<br />
for other people. Sometimes their skepticism about others' motives causes them to be<br />
suspicious, unfriendly, and uncooperative.<br />
Because agreeableness is a social trait, research has shown that one's agreeableness<br />
positively correlates with the quality <strong>of</strong> relationships with one's team members.<br />
Agreeableness also positively predicts transformational leadership skills. In a study<br />
conducted among 169 participants in leadership positions in a variety <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essions,<br />
Page 26 <strong>of</strong> 160
individuals were asked to take a personality test and have two evaluations completed by<br />
directly supervised subordinates. Leaders with high levels <strong>of</strong> agreeableness were more<br />
likely to be considered transformational rather than transactional. Although the<br />
relationship was not strong, (r=0.32, β=0.28, p
Neuroticism<br />
Neuroticism is the tendency to experience negative emotions, such as anger, anxiety, or<br />
depression. It is sometimes called emotional instability, or is reversed and referred to as<br />
emotional stability. According to Eysenck's (1967) theory <strong>of</strong> personality, neuroticism is<br />
interlinked with low tolerance for stress or aversive stimuli. Neuroticism is a classic<br />
temperament trait that has been studied in temperament research for decades, before it<br />
was adapted by the FFM. Since main properties <strong>of</strong> temperament traits are stability in life<br />
time and its neurophysiological basis, the FFM researchers used these properties <strong>of</strong><br />
Neuroticism to support their model. Those who score high in neuroticism are<br />
emotionally reactive and vulnerable to stress, they also tend to be flippant in the way<br />
they express emotion. <strong>The</strong>y are more likely to interpret ordinary situations as<br />
threatening, and minor frustrations as hopelessly difficult. <strong>The</strong>ir negative emotional<br />
reactions tend to persist for unusually long periods <strong>of</strong> time, which means they are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
in a bad mood. For instance, neuroticism is connected to a pessimistic approach toward<br />
work, confidence that work impedes personal relationships, and apparent anxiety linked<br />
with work. Furthermore, those who score high on neuroticism may display more skinconductance<br />
reactivity than those who score low on neuroticism. <strong>The</strong>se problems in<br />
emotional regulation can diminish the ability <strong>of</strong> a person scoring high on neuroticism to<br />
think clearly, make decisions, and cope effectively with stress. Lacking contentment in<br />
one's life achievements can correlate with high neuroticism scores and increase one's<br />
likelihood <strong>of</strong> falling into clinical depression. Moreover, individuals high in neuroticism<br />
tend to experience more negative life events, but neuroticism also changes in response<br />
to positive and negative life experiences.<br />
At the other end <strong>of</strong> the scale, individuals who score low in neuroticism are less easily<br />
upset and are less emotionally reactive. <strong>The</strong>y tend to be calm, emotionally stable, and<br />
free from persistent negative feelings. Freedom from negative feelings does not mean<br />
that low-scorers experience a lot <strong>of</strong> positive feelings.<br />
Neuroticism is similar but not identical to being neurotic in the Freudian sense<br />
(i.e., neurosis.) Some psychologists prefer to call neuroticism by the term emotional<br />
instability to differentiate it from the term neurotic in a career test.<br />
Sample items<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I get irritated easily.<br />
I get stressed out easily.<br />
I get upset easily.<br />
I have frequent mood swings.<br />
I worry about things.<br />
I am much more anxious than most people.<br />
I am relaxed most <strong>of</strong> the time. (reversed)<br />
I seldom feel blue. (reversed)<br />
History<br />
Page 28 <strong>of</strong> 160
Early Trait Research<br />
In 1884, Sir Francis Galton was the first person who is known to have investigated the<br />
hypothesis that it is possible to derive a comprehensive taxonomy <strong>of</strong> human personality<br />
traits by sampling language: the lexical hypothesis. In 1936, Gordon Allport and S.<br />
Odbert put Sir Francis Galton's hypothesis into practice by extracting 4,504 adjectives<br />
which they believed were descriptive <strong>of</strong> observable and relatively permanent traits from<br />
the dictionaries at that time. In 1940, Raymond Cattell retained the adjectives, and<br />
eliminated synonyms to reduce the total to 171. He constructed a self-report instrument<br />
for the clusters <strong>of</strong> personality traits he found from the adjectives, which he called<br />
the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Based on a subset <strong>of</strong> only 20 <strong>of</strong> the 36<br />
dimensions that Cattell had originally discovered, Ernest Tupes and Raymond Christal<br />
claimed to have found just five broad factors which they labeled: "surgency",<br />
"agreeableness", "dependability", "emotional stability", and "culture". Warren Norman<br />
subsequently relabeled "dependability" as "conscientiousness".<br />
Hiatus in Research<br />
For the next two decades, the changing zeitgeist made publication <strong>of</strong> personality<br />
research difficult. In his 1968 book Personality and Assessment, Walter<br />
Page 29 <strong>of</strong> 160
Mischel asserted that personality instruments could not predict behavior with<br />
a correlation <strong>of</strong> more than 0.3. Social psychologists like Mischel argued that attitudes<br />
and behavior were not stable, but varied with the situation. Predicting behavior from<br />
personality instruments was claimed to be impossible. However, it has subsequently<br />
been demonstrated empirically that the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the predictive correlations with<br />
real-life criteria can increase significantly under stressful emotional conditions (as<br />
opposed to the typical administration <strong>of</strong> personality measures under neutral emotional<br />
conditions), thereby accounting for a significantly greater proportion <strong>of</strong> the predictive<br />
variance.<br />
In addition, emerging methodologies challenged this point <strong>of</strong> view during the 1980s.<br />
Instead <strong>of</strong> trying to predict single instances <strong>of</strong> behavior, which was unreliable,<br />
researchers found that they could predict patterns <strong>of</strong> behavior by aggregating large<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> observations. As a result, correlations between personality and behavior<br />
increased substantially, and it was clear that "personality" did in fact exist. Personality<br />
and social psychologists now generally agree that both personal and situational<br />
variables are needed to account for human behavior. Trait theories became justified,<br />
and there was a resurgence <strong>of</strong> interest in this area. In the 1980s, Lewis Goldberg<br />
started his own lexical project, emphasizing five broad factors once again. He later<br />
coined the term "Big Five" as a label for the factors.<br />
Renewed Attention<br />
In a 1980 symposium in Honolulu, four prominent researchers, Lewis Goldberg, Naomi<br />
Takemoto-Chock, Andrew Comrey, and John M. Digman, reviewed the available<br />
personality instruments <strong>of</strong> the day. This event was followed by widespread acceptance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the five-factor model among personality researchers during the 1980s. Peter<br />
Saville and his team included the five-factor "Pentagon" model with the original OPQ in<br />
1984. Pentagon was closely followed by the NEO five-factor personality inventory,<br />
published by Costa and McCrae in 1985. However, the methodology employed in<br />
constructing the NEO instrument has been subjected to critical scrutiny (see section<br />
below).<br />
Temperament vs. Personality<br />
Biological and Developmental Factors<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are debates between researchers <strong>of</strong> temperament and researchers<br />
<strong>of</strong> personality as to whether or not biologically-based differences define a concept <strong>of</strong><br />
temperament or a part <strong>of</strong> personality. <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> such differences in pre-cultural<br />
individuals (such as animals or young infants) suggests that they belong to<br />
temperament since personality is a socio-cultural concept. For this reason<br />
developmental psychologists generally interpret individual differences in children as an<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> temperament rather than personality. Some researchers argue that<br />
temperaments and personality traits are age-specific manifestations <strong>of</strong> virtually the<br />
same latent qualities. Some believe that early childhood temperaments may become<br />
Page 30 <strong>of</strong> 160
adolescent and adult personality traits as individuals' basic genetic characteristics<br />
actively, reactively, and passively interact with their changing environments.<br />
Researchers <strong>of</strong> adult temperament point out that, similarly to sex, age and mental<br />
illness, temperament is based on biochemical systems whereas personality is a product<br />
<strong>of</strong> socialization <strong>of</strong> an individual possessing these four types <strong>of</strong> features. Temperament<br />
interacts with social-cultural factors, but still cannot be controlled or easily changed by<br />
these factors. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is suggested that temperament should be kept as an<br />
independent concept for further studies and not be conflated with personality. Moreover,<br />
temperament refers to dynamical features <strong>of</strong> behaviour (energetic, tempo, sensitivity<br />
and emotionality-related), whereas personality is to be considered a psycho-social<br />
construct comprising the content characteristics <strong>of</strong> human behavior (such as values,<br />
attitudes, habits, preferences, personal history, self-image). Temperament researchers<br />
point out that the lack <strong>of</strong> attention to extant temperament research by the developers <strong>of</strong><br />
the Big Five model lead to an overlap between its dimensions and dimensions<br />
described in multiple temperament models much earlier.<br />
For example, neuroticism reflects the traditional temperament dimension <strong>of</strong><br />
emotionality, extraversion the temperament dimension <strong>of</strong> "energy" or "activity", and<br />
openness to experience the temperament dimension <strong>of</strong> sensation-seeking.<br />
Page 31 <strong>of</strong> 160
Heritability<br />
Personality research conducted on twin subjects suggests that both heritable and<br />
environmental factors contribute to the Big Five personality traits.<br />
Genetically informative research, including twin studies, suggest that heritability and<br />
environmental factors both influence all five factors to the same degree. Among four<br />
recent twin studies, the mean percentage for heritability was calculated for each<br />
personality and it was concluded that heritability influenced the five factors broadly. <strong>The</strong><br />
self-report measures were as follows: openness to experience was estimated to have a<br />
57% genetic influence, extraversion 54%, conscientiousness 49%, neuroticism 48%,<br />
and agreeableness 42%.<br />
Non-Humans<br />
<strong>The</strong> Big 5 personality traits can be seen in chimpanzees.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Big Five personality traits have been assessed in some non-human species but<br />
methodology is debatable. In one series <strong>of</strong> studies, human ratings<br />
<strong>of</strong> chimpanzees using the Hominoid Personality Questionnaire, revealed factors <strong>of</strong><br />
extraversion, conscientiousness and agreeableness – as well as an additional factor <strong>of</strong><br />
dominance – across hundreds <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees in zoological parks, a large naturalistic<br />
sanctuary, and a research laboratory. Neuroticism and openness factors were found in<br />
an original zoo sample, but were not replicated in a new zoo sample or in other settings<br />
(perhaps reflecting the design <strong>of</strong> the CPQ). A study review found that markers for the<br />
three dimensions extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness were found most<br />
consistently across different species, followed by openness; only chimpanzees showed<br />
markers for conscientious behavior.<br />
Development During Childhood and Adolescence<br />
Research on the Big Five, and personality in general, has focused primarily on<br />
individual differences in adulthood, rather than in childhood and adolescence, and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
include temperament traits. Recently, there has been growing recognition <strong>of</strong> the need to<br />
study child and adolescent personality trait development in order to understand how<br />
traits develop and change throughout the lifespan.<br />
Recent studies have begun to explore the developmental origins and trajectories <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Big Five among children and adolescents, especially those that relate to<br />
temperament. Many researchers have sought to distinguish between personality and<br />
temperament. Temperament <strong>of</strong>ten refers to early behavioral and affective<br />
characteristics that are thought to be driven primarily by genes. Models <strong>of</strong> temperament<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten include four trait dimensions: surgency/ sociability, negative emotionality,<br />
persistence/effortful control, and activity level. Some <strong>of</strong> these differences in<br />
temperament are evident at, if not before, birth. For example, both parents and<br />
researchers recognize that some newborn infants are peaceful and easily soothed while<br />
Page 32 <strong>of</strong> 160
others are comparatively fussy and hard to calm. Unlike temperament, however, many<br />
researchers view the development <strong>of</strong> personality as gradually occurring throughout<br />
childhood. Contrary to some researchers who question whether children have stable<br />
personality traits, Big Five or otherwise, most researchers contend that there are<br />
significant psychological differences between children that are associated with relatively<br />
stable, distinct, and salient behavior patterns.<br />
<strong>The</strong> structure, manifestations, and development <strong>of</strong> the Big Five in childhood and<br />
adolescence has been studied using a variety <strong>of</strong> methods, including parent- and<br />
teacher-ratings, preadolescent and adolescent self- and peer-ratings, and observations<br />
<strong>of</strong> parent-child interactions. Results from these studies support the relative stability <strong>of</strong><br />
personality traits across the human lifespan, at least from preschool age through<br />
adulthood. More specifically, research suggests that four <strong>of</strong> the Big Five –namely<br />
Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness- reliably describe<br />
personality differences in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. However, some<br />
evidence suggests that Openness may not be a fundamental, stable part <strong>of</strong> childhood<br />
personality. Although some researchers have found that Openness in children and<br />
adolescents relates to attributes such as creativity, curiosity, imagination, and<br />
intellect, many researchers have failed to find distinct individual differences in Openness<br />
in childhood and early adolescence. Potentially, Openness may (a) manifest in unique,<br />
currently unknown ways in childhood or (b) may only manifest as children develop<br />
socially and cognitively. Other studies have found evidence for all <strong>of</strong> the Big Five traits<br />
in childhood and adolescence as well as two other child-specific traits: Irritability and<br />
Activity. Despite these specific differences, the majority <strong>of</strong> findings suggest that<br />
personality traits –particularly Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, and<br />
Page 33 <strong>of</strong> 160
Agreeableness- are evident in childhood and adolescence and are associated with<br />
distinct social-emotional patterns <strong>of</strong> behavior that are largely consistent with adult<br />
manifestations <strong>of</strong> those same personality traits. Some researchers have proposed the<br />
youth personality trait is best described by six trait dimensions: neuroticism,<br />
extroversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and<br />
activity. Despite some preliminary evidence for this “Little Six” model, research in this<br />
area has been delayed by a lack <strong>of</strong> available measures.<br />
Previous research has found evidence that most adults become more agreeable,<br />
conscientious, and less neurotic as they age. This has been referred to as<br />
the maturation effect. Many researchers have sought to investigate how trends in adult<br />
personality development compare to trends in youth personality development. Two main<br />
population-level indices have been important in this area <strong>of</strong> research: rank-order<br />
consistency and mean-level consistency. Rank-order consistency indicates the relative<br />
placement <strong>of</strong> individuals within a group. Mean-level consistency indicates whether<br />
groups increase or decrease on certain traits throughout the lifetime.<br />
Findings from these studies indicate that, consistent with adult personality trends, youth<br />
personality becomes increasingly more stable in terms <strong>of</strong> rank-order throughout<br />
childhood. Unlike adult personality research, which indicates that people become<br />
agreeable, conscientious, and emotionally stable with age, some findings in youth<br />
personality research have indicated that mean-levels <strong>of</strong> agreeableness,<br />
conscientiousness, and openness to experience decline from late childhood to late<br />
adolescence. <strong>The</strong> disruption hypothesis, which proposes that biological, social, and<br />
psychological changes experienced during youth result in temporary dips in maturity,<br />
has been proposed to explain these findings.<br />
Extraversion/Positive Emotionality<br />
In Big Five studies, extraversion has been associated with surgency. Children with high<br />
Extraversion are energetic, talkative, social, and dominant with children and adults;<br />
whereas, children with low Extraversion tend to be quiet, calm, inhibited, and<br />
submissive to other children and adults. Individual differences in Extraversion first<br />
manifest in infancy as varying levels <strong>of</strong> positive emotionality. <strong>The</strong>se differences in turn<br />
predict social and physical activity during later childhood and may represent, or be<br />
associated with, the behavioral activation system. In children, Extraversion/Positive<br />
Emotionality includes four sub-traits: three traits that are similar to the previously<br />
described traits <strong>of</strong> temperament – activity, sociability, shyness, and the trait<br />
<strong>of</strong> dominance.<br />
<br />
Activity: Similarly to findings in temperament research, children with high activity<br />
tend to have high energy levels and more intense and frequent motor activity<br />
compared to their peers. Salient differences in activity reliably manifest in<br />
infancy, persist through adolescence, and fade as motor activity decreases in<br />
adulthood or potentially develops into talkativeness.<br />
Page 34 <strong>of</strong> 160
Dominance: Children with high dominance tend to influence the behavior <strong>of</strong><br />
others, particularly their peers, to obtain desirable rewards or outcomes. Such<br />
children are generally skilled at organizing activities and games and deceiving<br />
others by controlling their nonverbal behavior.<br />
Shyness: Children with high shyness are generally socially withdrawn, nervous,<br />
and inhibited around strangers. In time, such children may become fearful even<br />
around "known others", especially if their peers reject them. Similar pattern was<br />
described in temperament longitudinal studies <strong>of</strong> shyness<br />
Sociability: Children with high sociability generally prefer to be with others rather<br />
than alone. During middle childhood, the distinction between low sociability and<br />
high shyness becomes more pronounced, particularly as children gain greater<br />
control over how and where they spend their time.<br />
Development<br />
Throughout<br />
Adulthood<br />
Many studies<br />
<strong>of</strong> longitudinal data,<br />
which correlate<br />
people's test scores<br />
over time, and crosssectional<br />
data, which<br />
compare personality<br />
levels across different<br />
age groups, show a<br />
high degree <strong>of</strong> stability<br />
in personality traits<br />
during adulthood,<br />
especially Neuroticism<br />
trait that is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
regarded as a<br />
temperament<br />
trait similarly to<br />
longitudinal research<br />
in temperament for the<br />
same traits. It is<br />
shown that the<br />
personality stabilizes<br />
for working-age<br />
individuals within about four years after starting working. <strong>The</strong>re is also little evidence<br />
that adverse life events can have any significant impact on the personality <strong>of</strong><br />
individuals. More recent research and meta-analyses <strong>of</strong> previous studies, however,<br />
indicate that change occurs in all five traits at various points in the lifespan. <strong>The</strong> new<br />
Page 35 <strong>of</strong> 160
esearch shows evidence for a maturation effect. On average, levels <strong>of</strong> agreeableness<br />
and conscientiousness typically increase with time, whereas extraversion, neuroticism,<br />
and openness tend to decrease. Research has also demonstrated that changes in Big<br />
Five personality traits depend on the individual's current stage <strong>of</strong> development. For<br />
example, levels <strong>of</strong> agreeableness and conscientiousness demonstrate a negative trend<br />
during childhood and early adolescence before trending upwards during late<br />
adolescence and into adulthood. In addition to these group effects, there are individual<br />
differences: different people demonstrate unique patterns <strong>of</strong> change at all stages <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
In addition, some research (Fleeson, 2001) suggests that the Big Five should not be<br />
conceived <strong>of</strong> as dichotomies (such as extraversion vs. introversion) but as continua.<br />
Each individual has the capacity to move along each dimension as circumstances<br />
(social or temporal) change. He is or she is therefore not simply on one end <strong>of</strong> each trait<br />
dichotomy but is a blend <strong>of</strong> both, exhibiting some characteristics more <strong>of</strong>ten than others:<br />
Research regarding personality with growing age has suggested that as individuals<br />
enter their elder years (79–86), those with lower IQ see a raise in extraversion, but a<br />
decline in conscientiousness and physical well being.<br />
Research by Cobb-Clark and Schurer indicates that personality traits are generally<br />
stable among adult workers. <strong>The</strong> research done on personality also mirrors previous<br />
results on locus <strong>of</strong> control.<br />
Gender Differences<br />
Group Differences<br />
Cross-cultural research has shown some patterns <strong>of</strong> gender differences on responses<br />
to the NEO-PI-R and the Big Five Inventory. For example, women consistently report<br />
higher Neuroticism, Agreeableness, warmth (an extraversion facet) and openness to<br />
feelings, and men <strong>of</strong>ten report higher assertiveness (a facet <strong>of</strong> extraversion) and<br />
openness to ideas as assessed by the NEO-PI-R.<br />
A study <strong>of</strong> gender differences in 55 nations using the Big Five Inventory found that<br />
women tended to be somewhat higher than men in neuroticism, extraversion,<br />
agreeableness, and conscientiousness. <strong>The</strong> difference in neuroticism was the most<br />
prominent and consistent, with significant differences found in 49 <strong>of</strong> the 55 nations<br />
surveyed. Gender differences in personality traits are largest in prosperous, healthy,<br />
and more gender-egalitarian cultures. A plausible explanation for this is that acts by<br />
women in individualistic, egalitarian countries are more likely to be attributed to their<br />
personality, rather than being attributed to ascribed gender roles within collectivist,<br />
traditional countries. Differences in the magnitude <strong>of</strong> sex differences between more or<br />
less developed world regions were due to differences between men, not women, in<br />
these respective regions. That is, men in highly developed world regions were less<br />
neurotic, extraverted, conscientious and agreeable compared to men in less developed<br />
world regions. Women, on the other hand tended not to differ in personality traits across<br />
Page 36 <strong>of</strong> 160
egions. <strong>The</strong> most simple explanation for this gender data is that women remain<br />
relatively resource-poor, regardless <strong>of</strong> the circumstances <strong>of</strong> males within a first-world<br />
country. However, the authors <strong>of</strong> this study speculated that resource-poor environments<br />
(that is,<br />
countries with<br />
low<br />
levels <strong>of</strong><br />
development)<br />
may inhibit the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> gender<br />
differences,<br />
whereas<br />
resource-<br />
rich<br />
environments<br />
facilitate<br />
them. This may be because<br />
males require more resources than females<br />
in order to reach their full developmental potential.<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors also argued that due to different<br />
evolutionary pressures, men may<br />
have evolved to be<br />
more risk taking and<br />
socially dominant, whereas women<br />
evolved to be more cautious and<br />
nurturing. Ancient hunter-gatherer<br />
societies may have been more<br />
egalitarian than later agriculturally oriented societies.<br />
Hence, the development <strong>of</strong> gender inequalities may have<br />
acted to constrain the development <strong>of</strong> gender<br />
differences in personality that originally evolved in huntergatherer<br />
societies. As modern societies have become more<br />
egalitarian, again, it may be that<br />
innate sex differences are no longer<br />
constrained and hence manifest more fully than in<br />
less-developed cultures. Currently, this hypothesis<br />
remains untested, as gender differences in modern societies have not been compared<br />
with those in hunter-gatherer societies.<br />
Birth-Order Differences<br />
Frank Sulloway argues that firstborns are more conscientious, more socially dominant,<br />
less agreeable, and less open to new ideas compared to laterborns. Large-scale studies<br />
Page 37 <strong>of</strong> 160
using random samples and self-report personality tests, however, have found milder<br />
effects than Sulloway claimed, or no significant effects <strong>of</strong> birth order on personality.<br />
In 2002, the journal <strong>of</strong> psychology posted a Big Five Personality Trait Difference;<br />
Researchers explored relationship between the five factor model and the Universal-<br />
Diverse Orientation (UDO) in councillor trainees. (Thompson, R., Brossart, D., and<br />
Mivielle, A., 2002) UDO is known as one social attitude that produces a strong<br />
awareness and/or acceptance towards the similaralities and difference among<br />
individuals. (Miville, M., Romas, J., Johnson, J., and Lon, R. 2002)<br />
<strong>The</strong> study has shown the councillor trainees that are more open to the idea <strong>of</strong> creative<br />
expressions among individuals are more likely to work with a diverse group <strong>of</strong> clients,<br />
and feel comfortable in their role. (Thompson, R. et al. 2002)<br />
Cultural Differences<br />
<strong>The</strong> Big Five have been pursued in a variety <strong>of</strong> languages and cultures, such as<br />
German, Chinese, Indian, etc. For example, Thompson has claimed to find the Big Five<br />
structure across several cultures using an international English language scale.<br />
Cheung, van de Vijver, and Leong (2011) suggest, however, that the Openness factor is<br />
particularly unsupported in Asian countries and that a different fifth factor is identified.<br />
Recent work has found relationships between Geert H<strong>of</strong>stede's cultural factors,<br />
Individualism, Power Distance, Masculinity, and Uncertainty Avoidance, with the<br />
average Big Five scores in a country. For instance, the degree to which a country<br />
values individualism correlates with its average extraversion, whereas people living in<br />
cultures which are accepting <strong>of</strong> large inequalities in their power structures tend to score<br />
somewhat higher on conscientiousness.<br />
Personality differences around the world might even have contributed to the emergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> different political systems. A recent study has found that countries’ average<br />
personality trait levels are correlated with their political systems: countries with higher<br />
average trait Openness tended to have more democratic institutions, an association that<br />
held even after factoring out other relevant influences such as economic development.<br />
Attempts to replicate the Big Five in other countries with local dictionaries have<br />
succeeded in some countries but not in others. Apparently, for instance, Hungarians do<br />
not appear to have a single agreeableness factor.<br />
Other researchers have found evidence for agreeableness but not for other factors. It is<br />
important to recognize that individual differences in traits are relevant in a specific<br />
cultural context, and that the traits do not have their effects outside <strong>of</strong> that context<br />
Page 38 <strong>of</strong> 160
Relationships<br />
Personality Disorders<br />
As <strong>of</strong> 2002, there were over fifty published studies relating the FFM to personality<br />
disorders. Since that time, quite a number <strong>of</strong> additional studies have expanded on this<br />
research base and provided further empirical support for understanding the DSM<br />
personality disorders in terms <strong>of</strong> the FFM domains.<br />
In her review <strong>of</strong> the personality<br />
disorder literature published in<br />
2007, Lee Anna Clark asserted that "the<br />
five-factor model <strong>of</strong> personality is widely<br />
accepted as representing the<br />
higher-order structure <strong>of</strong> both normal and<br />
abnormal personality traits". However, other<br />
researches disagree that this model is<br />
widely accepted (see the section<br />
Critique below) and suggest that it<br />
simply replicates early temperament<br />
research. Noticeably, FFM publications<br />
never compare their findings to<br />
temperament models even though temperament<br />
and mental<br />
disorders (especially<br />
personality disorders) are thought to be based on the<br />
same neurotransmitter imbalances, just to varying degrees.<br />
<strong>The</strong> five-factor model was claimed to significantly predict all ten personality disorder<br />
symptoms and outperform the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) in<br />
the prediction <strong>of</strong> borderline, avoidant, and dependent personality disorder<br />
symptoms. However, most predictions related to an increase in Neuroticism and a<br />
decrease in Agreeableness, and therefore did not differentiate between the disorders<br />
very well.<br />
Common Mental Disorders<br />
Average deviation <strong>of</strong> five factor personality pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> heroin users from the population<br />
mean. N stands for Neuroticism, E for Extraversion, O for Openness to experience, A<br />
for Agreeableness and C for Conscientiousness.<br />
Converging evidence from several nationally representative studies has established<br />
three classes <strong>of</strong> mental disorders which are especially common in the general<br />
population: Depressive disorders (e.g., major depressive disorder(MDD), dysthymic<br />
disorder), anxiety disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), post-traumatic<br />
stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobia, and social<br />
phobia), [145] and substance use disorders (SUDs).<br />
Page 39 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong>se common mental disorders (CMDs) have been empirically linked to the Big Five<br />
personality traits, neuroticism in particular. Numerous studies have found that having<br />
high scores <strong>of</strong> neuroticism significantly increases one's risk for developing a CMD. A<br />
large-scale meta-analysis (n > 75,000) examining the relationship between all <strong>of</strong> the Big<br />
Five personality traits and CMDs found that low conscientiousness yielded consistently<br />
strong effects for each CMD examined (i.e., MDD, dysthymic disorder, GAD, PTSD,<br />
panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, specific phobia, and SUD). This finding<br />
parallels research on physical health, which has established that conscientiousness is<br />
the strongest personality predictor <strong>of</strong> mortality and is highly correlated with making poor<br />
health choices. In regards to the other personality domains, the meta-analysis found<br />
that all CMDs examined were defined by high neuroticism, most exhibited low<br />
extraversion, only SUD was linked to agreeableness (negatively), and no disorders<br />
were associated with Openness. A meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> 59 longitudinal studies showed that<br />
high neuroticism predicted the development <strong>of</strong> anxiety, depression, substance abuse,<br />
psychosis, schizophrenia, and non-specific mental distress, also after adjustment for<br />
baseline symptoms and psychiatric history.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Personality-Psychopathology Models<br />
Five major models have been posed to explain the nature <strong>of</strong> the relationship between<br />
personality and mental illness. <strong>The</strong>re is currently no single "best model", as each <strong>of</strong><br />
them has received at least some empirical support. It is also important to note that these<br />
models are not mutually exclusive – more than one may be operating for a particular<br />
individual and various mental disorders may be explained by different models.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>The</strong> Vulnerability/Risk Model: According to this model, personality contributes<br />
to the onset or etiology <strong>of</strong> various common mental disorders. In other words, preexisting<br />
personality traits either cause the development <strong>of</strong> CMDs directly or<br />
enhance the impact <strong>of</strong> causal risk factors. <strong>The</strong>re is strong support for neuroticism<br />
being a robust vulnerability factor.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Pathoplasty Model: This model proposes that premorbid personality traits<br />
impact the expression, course, severity, and/or treatment response <strong>of</strong> a mental<br />
disorder. An example <strong>of</strong> this relationship would be a heightened likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />
committing suicide for a depressed individual who also has low levels <strong>of</strong><br />
constraint.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Common Cause Model: According to the common cause model,<br />
personality traits are predictive <strong>of</strong> CMDs because personality and<br />
psychopathology have shared genetic and environmental determinants which<br />
result in non-causal associations between the two constructs.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Spectrum Model: This model proposes that associations between<br />
personality and psychopathology are found because these two constructs both<br />
occupy a single domain or spectrum and psychopathology is simply a display <strong>of</strong><br />
the extremes <strong>of</strong> normal personality function. Support for this model is provided by<br />
Page 40 <strong>of</strong> 160
an issue <strong>of</strong> criterion overlap. For instance, two <strong>of</strong> the primary facet scales <strong>of</strong><br />
neuroticism in the NEO-PI-R are "depression" and "anxiety". Thus the fact that<br />
diagnostic criteria for depression, anxiety, and neuroticism assess the same<br />
content increases the correlations between these domains.<br />
<br />
<strong>The</strong> Scar Model: According to the scar model, episodes <strong>of</strong> a mental disorder<br />
'scar' an individual's personality, changing it in significant ways from premorbid<br />
functioning. An example <strong>of</strong> a scar effect would be a decrease in openness to<br />
experience following an episode <strong>of</strong> PTSD.<br />
Health<br />
Being highly conscientious may add as much as five years to one's life. <strong>The</strong> Big Five<br />
personality traits also predict positive health outcomes. In an elderly Japanese<br />
sample, conscientiousness, extraversion, and openness were related to lower risk <strong>of</strong><br />
mortality.<br />
Academic Achievement<br />
Education<br />
Personality plays an important role that affects academic achievement. A study<br />
conducted with 308 undergraduates who completed the Five Factor Inventory<br />
Processes and <strong>of</strong>fered their GPA suggested that conscientiousness and agreeableness<br />
have a positive relationship with all types <strong>of</strong> learning styles (synthesis analysis,<br />
Page 41 <strong>of</strong> 160
methodical study, fact retention, and elaborative processing), whereas neuroticism has<br />
an inverse relationship with them all. Moreover, extraversion and openness were<br />
proportional to elaborative processing. <strong>The</strong> Big Five personality traits accounted for<br />
14% <strong>of</strong> the variance in GPA, suggesting that personality traits make some contributions<br />
to academic performance. Furthermore, reflective learning styles (synthesis-analysis<br />
and elaborative processing) were able to mediate the relationship between openness<br />
and GPA. <strong>The</strong>se results indicate that intellectual curiousness has significant<br />
enhancement in academic performance if students can combine their scholarly interest<br />
with thoughtful information processing.<br />
A recent study <strong>of</strong> Israeli high-school students found that those in the gifted program<br />
systematically scored higher on openness and lower on neuroticism than those not in<br />
the gifted program. While not a measure <strong>of</strong> the Big Five, gifted students also reported<br />
less state anxiety than students not in the gifted program. Specific Big Five personality<br />
traits predict learning styles in addition to academic success.<br />
<br />
<br />
GPA and exam performance are both predicted by conscientiousness<br />
neuroticism is negatively related to academic success<br />
openness predicts utilizing synthesis-analysis and elaborative-processing<br />
learning styles<br />
neuroticism negatively correlates with learning styles in general<br />
<br />
openness and extraversion both predict all four learning styles.<br />
Studies conducted on college students have concluded that hope, which is linked to<br />
agreeableness, has a positive effect on psychological well being. Individuals high in<br />
neurotic tendencies are less likely to display hopeful tendencies and are negatively<br />
associated with well-being. Personality can sometimes be flexible and measuring the<br />
big five personality for individuals as they enter certain stages <strong>of</strong> life may predict their<br />
educational identity. Recent studies have suggested the likelihood <strong>of</strong> an individual's<br />
personality affecting their educational identity.<br />
Learning Styles<br />
Learning styles have been described as "enduring ways <strong>of</strong> thinking and processing<br />
information".<br />
Although there is no evidence that personality determines thinking styles, they may be<br />
intertwined in ways that link thinking styles to the Big Five personality traits. <strong>The</strong>re is no<br />
general consensus on the number or specifications <strong>of</strong> particular learning styles, but<br />
there have been many different proposals.<br />
Smeck, Ribicj, and Ramanaih (1997) defined four types <strong>of</strong> learning styles:<br />
Page 42 <strong>of</strong> 160
synthesis analysis<br />
methodical study<br />
fact retention<br />
elaborative processing<br />
When all four facets are implicated within the classroom, they will each likely improve<br />
academic achievement. This model asserts that students develop either agentic/shallow<br />
processing or reflective/deep processing. Deep processors are more <strong>of</strong>ten than not<br />
found to be more conscientious, intellectually open, and extraverted when compared to<br />
shallow processors. Deep processing is associated with appropriate study methods<br />
(methodical study) and a stronger ability to analyze information (synthesis analysis),<br />
whereas shallow processors prefer structured fact retention learning styles and are<br />
better suited for elaborative processing. <strong>The</strong> main functions <strong>of</strong> these four specific<br />
learning styles are as follows:<br />
Name<br />
Synthesis Analysis:<br />
Function<br />
processing information, forming<br />
categories, and organizing them into<br />
hierarchies. This is the only one <strong>of</strong><br />
the learning styles that has explained<br />
a significant impact on academic<br />
performance.<br />
Methodical Study:<br />
methodical behavior while completing<br />
academic assignments<br />
Fact Retention:<br />
focusing on the actual result instead<br />
<strong>of</strong> understanding the logic behind<br />
something<br />
Elaborative Processing:<br />
connecting and applying new ideas to<br />
existing knowledge<br />
Openness has been linked to learning styles that <strong>of</strong>ten lead to academic success and<br />
higher grades like synthesis analysis and methodical study. Because conscientiousness<br />
and openness have been shown to predict all four learning styles, it suggests that<br />
individuals who possess characteristics like discipline, determination, and curiosity are<br />
more likely to engage in all <strong>of</strong> the above learning styles.<br />
According to the research carried out by Komarraju, Karau, Schmeck & Avdic (2011),<br />
conscientiousness and agreeableness are positively related with all four learning styles,<br />
whereas neuroticism was negatively related with those four. Furthermore, extraversion<br />
and openness were only positively related to elaborative processing, and openness<br />
itself correlated with higher academic achievement.<br />
Page 43 <strong>of</strong> 160
Besides openness, all Big Five personality traits helped predict the educational identity<br />
<strong>of</strong> students. Based on these findings, scientists are beginning to see that there might be<br />
a large influence <strong>of</strong> the Big Five traits on academic motivation that then leads to<br />
predicting a student's academic performance.<br />
Some authors suggested that Big Five personality traits combined with learning styles<br />
can help predict some variations in the academic performance and the academic<br />
motivation <strong>of</strong> an individual which can then influence their academic achievements. This<br />
may be seen because individual differences in personality represent stable approaches<br />
to information processing. For instance, conscientiousness has consistently emerged as<br />
a stable predictor <strong>of</strong> success in exam performance, largely because conscientious<br />
students experience fewer study delays. <strong>The</strong> reason conscientiousness shows a<br />
positive association with the four learning styles is because students with high levels <strong>of</strong><br />
conscientiousness develop focused learning strategies and appear to be more<br />
disciplined and achievement-oriented.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Association for Psychological Science (APS), however, recently commissioned a<br />
report whose conclusion indicates that no significant evidence exists to make the<br />
conclusion that learning-style assessments should be included in the education system.<br />
<strong>The</strong> APS also suggested in their report that all existing learning styles have not been<br />
exhausted and that there could exist learning styles that have the potential to be worthy<br />
<strong>of</strong> being included in educational practices. Thus it is premature, at best, to conclude that<br />
the evidence linking the Big Five to "learning styles", or "learning styles" to learning<br />
itself, is valid.<br />
Work Success<br />
Controversy exists as to whether or not the Big 5 personality traits are correlated with<br />
success in the workplace.<br />
Within organizational communication, personality is taken into account <strong>of</strong> how a person<br />
carries themselves in the workplace. <strong>The</strong> five factor personality theory encompasses<br />
five different personalities which are as follows: openness, conscientiousness,<br />
extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Openness is being original and having<br />
imagination. Conscientiousness is being goal oriented with a willingness to achieve.<br />
Extraversion is being sociable and being an emotionally positive person. Agreeableness<br />
is being able to adapt and as a leader make necessary accommodations. <strong>The</strong> last<br />
personality trait was neuroticism which is usually when a leader tends to be negative<br />
emotionally and having a need for stability.<br />
It is believed that the Big Five traits are predictors <strong>of</strong> future performance outcomes. Job<br />
outcome measures include job and training pr<strong>of</strong>iciency and personnel data. However,<br />
research demonstrating such prediction has been criticized, in part because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
apparently low correlation coefficients characterizing the relationship between<br />
personality and job performance. In a 2007 article co-authored by six current or former<br />
editors <strong>of</strong> psychological journals, Dr. Kevin Murphy, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Psychology at<br />
Page 44 <strong>of</strong> 160
Pennsylvania State University and Editor <strong>of</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Psychology (1996–<br />
2002), states:<br />
<strong>The</strong> problem with personality tests is ... that the validity <strong>of</strong> personality measures as<br />
predictors <strong>of</strong> job performance is <strong>of</strong>ten disappointingly low. <strong>The</strong> argument for using<br />
personality tests to predict performance does not strike me as convincing in the first<br />
place.<br />
Such criticisms were put forward by Walter Mischel, whose publication caused a twodecades'<br />
long crisis in personality psychometrics. However, later work demonstrated (1)<br />
that the correlations obtained by psychometric personality researchers were actually<br />
very respectable by comparative standards, and (2) that the economic value <strong>of</strong> even<br />
incremental increases in prediction accuracy was exceptionally large, given the vast<br />
difference in performance by those who occupy complex job positions.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re have been studies that link national innovation to openness to experience and<br />
conscientiousness. Those who express these traits have showed leadership and<br />
beneficial ideas towards the country <strong>of</strong> origin.<br />
Some businesses, organizations, and interviewers assess individuals based on the Big<br />
Five personality traits. Research has suggested that individuals who are considered<br />
leaders typically exhibit lower amounts <strong>of</strong> neurotic traits, maintain higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />
openness (envisioning success), balanced levels <strong>of</strong> conscientiousness (well-organized),<br />
and balanced levels <strong>of</strong> extraversion (outgoing, but not excessive). Further studies have<br />
linked pr<strong>of</strong>essional burnout to neuroticism, and extraversion to enduring positive work<br />
experience. When it comes to making money, research has suggested that those who<br />
are high in agreeableness (especially men) are not as successful in accumulating<br />
income.<br />
Page 45 <strong>of</strong> 160
Some research suggests that vocational outcomes are correlated to Big Five personality<br />
traits. Conscientiousness predicts job performance in general. In addition, research has<br />
demonstrated that Agreeableness is negatively related to salary. Those high<br />
in Agreeablenessmake less, on average, than those low in the same<br />
trait. Neuroticism is also negatively related to salary<br />
while Conscientiousness and Extraversion are positive predictors <strong>of</strong><br />
salary. [184] Occupational self-efficacy has also been shown to be positively correlated<br />
with conscientiousness and negatively correlated with neuroticism. Significant predictors<br />
<strong>of</strong> career-advancement goals are: extraversion, conscientiousness, and agreeableness.<br />
Research designed to investigate the individual effects <strong>of</strong> Big Five personality traits on<br />
work performance via worker completed surveys and supervisor ratings <strong>of</strong> work<br />
performance has implicated individual traits in several different work roles<br />
performances. A "work role" is defined as the responsibilities an individual has while<br />
they are working. Nine work roles have been identified, which can be classified in three<br />
broader categories: pr<strong>of</strong>iciency (the ability <strong>of</strong> a worker to effectively perform their work<br />
duties), adaptivity (a workers ability to change working strategies in response to<br />
changing work environments), and proactivity (extent to which a worker will<br />
spontaneously put forth effort to change the work environment). <strong>The</strong>se three categories<br />
<strong>of</strong> behavior can then be directed towards three different levels: either the individual,<br />
team, or organizational level leading to the nine different work role performance<br />
possibilities.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Openness is positively related to proactivity at the individual and the<br />
organizational levels and is negatively related to team and organizational<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iciency. <strong>The</strong>se effects were found to be completely independent <strong>of</strong> one<br />
another.<br />
Agreeableness is negatively related to individual task proactivity.<br />
Extraversion is negatively related to individual task pr<strong>of</strong>iciency.<br />
Conscientiousness is positively related to all forms <strong>of</strong> work role performance.<br />
Neuroticism is negatively related to all forms <strong>of</strong> work role performance.<br />
Two theories have been integrated in an attempt to account for these differences in<br />
work role performance. Trait activation theory posits that within a person trait levels<br />
predict future behavior, that trait levels differ between people, and that work-related<br />
cues activate traits which leads to work relevant behaviors. Role theory suggests that<br />
role senders provide cues to elicit desired behaviors. In this context, role senders (i.e.:<br />
supervisors, managers, et cetera) provide workers with cues for expected behaviors,<br />
which in turn activates personality traits and work relevant behaviors. In essence,<br />
expectations <strong>of</strong> the role sender lead to different behavioral outcomes depending on the<br />
trait levels <strong>of</strong> individual workers and because people differ in trait levels, responses to<br />
these cues will not be universal.<br />
Page 46 <strong>of</strong> 160
Romantic Relationships<br />
<strong>The</strong> Big Five model <strong>of</strong> personality was used for attempts to predict satisfaction in<br />
romantic relationships, relationship quality in dating, engaged, and married couples.<br />
Dating couples<br />
Self-reported relationship quality is negatively related to partnerreported<br />
neuroticism and positively related to both self and partnerreported<br />
conscientiousness<br />
Engaged couples<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Self-reported relationship quality was higher among those high in partnerreported<br />
openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness.<br />
Self-reported relationship quality was higher among those high in selfreported<br />
extraversion and agreeableness.<br />
Self-reported relationship quality is negatively related to both self and partnerreported<br />
neuroticism<br />
Observers rated the relationship quality higher if the participating partner's selfreported<br />
extraversion was high<br />
Page 47 <strong>of</strong> 160
Married couples<br />
<br />
<br />
High self-reported neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness are related to<br />
high levels <strong>of</strong> self-reported relationship quality<br />
Partner-reported agreeableness is related to observed relationship quality.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se reports are, however, rare and not conclusive.<br />
Limitation <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Predictive Power <strong>of</strong> Personality Traits<br />
<strong>The</strong> predictive effects <strong>of</strong> the Big Five personality traits relate mostly to social functioning<br />
and rules-driven behavior and are not very specific for prediction <strong>of</strong> particular aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
behavior. For example, it was noted that high neuroticism precedes the development <strong>of</strong><br />
all common mental disorders., and this trait does not even always attributed to<br />
personality by temperament researchers. Further evidence is required to fully uncover<br />
the nature and differences between personality traits, temperament and life outcomes.<br />
Social and contextual parameters also play a role in outcomes and the interaction<br />
between the two is not yet fully understood.<br />
Several measures <strong>of</strong> the Big Five exist:<br />
Measurements<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
International Personality Item Pool (IPIP)<br />
NEO-PI-R<br />
<strong>The</strong> Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) and the Five Item Personality<br />
Inventory (FIPI) are very abbreviated rating forms <strong>of</strong> the Big Five personality<br />
traits.<br />
Self-descriptive sentence questionnaires<br />
Lexical questionnaires<br />
Self-report questionnaires<br />
Relative-scored Big 5 measure<br />
<strong>The</strong> most frequently used measures <strong>of</strong> the Big Five comprise either items that are selfdescriptive<br />
sentences or, in the case <strong>of</strong> lexical measures, items that are single<br />
adjectives. Due to the length <strong>of</strong> sentence-based and some lexical measures, short<br />
forms have been developed and validated for use in applied research settings where<br />
questionnaire space and respondent time are limited, such as the 40-item<br />
balanced International English Big-Five Mini-Markers or a very brief (10 item) measure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Big Five domains. Research has suggested that some methodologies in<br />
administering personality tests are inadequate in length and provide insufficient detail to<br />
truly evaluate personality. Usually, longer, more detailed questions will give a more<br />
accurate portrayal <strong>of</strong> personality. <strong>The</strong> five factor structure has been replicated in peer<br />
reports. However, many <strong>of</strong> the substantive findings rely on self-reports.<br />
Page 48 <strong>of</strong> 160
Much <strong>of</strong> the evidence on the measures <strong>of</strong> the Big 5 relies on self-report questionnaires,<br />
which makes self-report bias and falsification <strong>of</strong> responses difficult to deal with and<br />
account for. It has been argued that the Big Five tests do not create an accurate<br />
personality pr<strong>of</strong>ile because the responses given on these tests are not true in all<br />
cases. For example, questionnaires are answered by potential employees who might<br />
choose answers that paint them in the best light.<br />
Research suggests that a relative-scored Big Five measure in which respondents had to<br />
make repeated choices between equally desirable personality descriptors may be a<br />
potential alternative to traditional Big Five measures in accurately assessing personality<br />
traits, especially when lying or biased responding is present. When compared with a<br />
traditional Big Five measure for its ability to predict GPA and creative achievement<br />
under both normal and "fake good"-bias response conditions, the relative-scored<br />
measure significantly and consistently predicted these outcomes under both conditions;<br />
however, the Likert questionnaire lost its predictive ability in the faking condition. Thus,<br />
the relative-scored measure proved to be less affected by biased responding than the<br />
Likert measure <strong>of</strong> the Big Five.<br />
Andrew H. Schwartz analyzed 700 million words, phrases, and topic instances collected<br />
from the Facebook messages <strong>of</strong> 75,000 volunteers, who also took standard personality<br />
tests, and found striking variations in language with personality, gender, and age.<br />
Critique<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposed Big Five model has been subjected to considerable critical scrutiny and<br />
defense for the model.<br />
Page 49 <strong>of</strong> 160
Subsequent critical replies by Jack Block at the University <strong>of</strong> California Berkeley<br />
followed. It has been argued that there are limitations to the scope <strong>of</strong> the Big Five model<br />
as an explanatory or predictive theory. It has also been argued that measures <strong>of</strong> the Big<br />
Five account for only 56% <strong>of</strong> the normal personality trait sphere alone (not even<br />
considering the abnormal personality trait sphere). Also, the static Big Five is not theorydriven,<br />
it is merely a statistically-driven investigation <strong>of</strong> certain descriptors that tend to<br />
cluster together <strong>of</strong>ten based on less than optimal factor analytic procedures. Measures<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Big Five constructs appear to show some consistency in interviews, selfdescriptions<br />
and observations, and this static five-factor structure seems to be found<br />
across a wide range <strong>of</strong> participants <strong>of</strong> different ages and cultures. However, while<br />
genotypic temperament trait dimensions might appear across different cultures, the<br />
phenotypic expression <strong>of</strong> personality traits differs pr<strong>of</strong>oundly across different cultures as<br />
a function <strong>of</strong> the different socio-cultural conditioning and experiential learning that takes<br />
place within different cultural settings.<br />
Moreover, the fact that the Big Five model was based on lexical hypothesis, (i.e. on the<br />
verbal descriptors <strong>of</strong> individual differences) indicated strong methodological flaws in this<br />
model, especially related to its main factors, Extraversion and Neuroticism. First, there<br />
is a natural pro-social bias <strong>of</strong> language in people's verbal evaluations. After all,<br />
language is an invention <strong>of</strong> group dynamics that was developed to facilitate<br />
socialization, the exchange <strong>of</strong> information and to synchronize group activity. This social<br />
function <strong>of</strong> language therefore creates a sociability bias in verbal descriptors <strong>of</strong> human<br />
behaviour: there are more words related to social than physical or even mental aspects<br />
<strong>of</strong> behavior. <strong>The</strong> sheer number <strong>of</strong> such descriptors will cause them to group into a<br />
largest factor in any language, and such grouping has nothing to do with the way that<br />
core systems <strong>of</strong> individual differences are set up. Second, there is also a negativity bias<br />
in emotionality (i.e. most emotions have negative affectivity), and there are more words<br />
in language to describe negative rather than positive emotions. Such asymmetry in<br />
emotional valence creates another bias in language. Experiments using the lexical<br />
hypothesis approach indeed demonstrated that the use <strong>of</strong> lexical material skews the<br />
resulting dimensionality according to a sociability bias <strong>of</strong> language and a negativity bias<br />
<strong>of</strong> emotionality, grouping all evaluations around these two dimensions. This means that<br />
the two largest dimensions in the Big Five model might be just an artifact <strong>of</strong> the lexical<br />
approach that this model employed.<br />
Limited Scope<br />
One common criticism is that the Big Five does not explain all <strong>of</strong> human personality.<br />
Some psychologists have dissented from the model precisely because they feel it<br />
neglects other domains <strong>of</strong> personality, such<br />
as religiosity, manipulativeness/machiavellianism, honesty,<br />
sexiness/seductiveness, thriftiness, conservativeness, masculinity/femininity, snobbishn<br />
ess/egotism, sense <strong>of</strong> humour, and risk-taking/thrill-seeking. [214][215] Dan P.<br />
McAdams has called the Big Five a "psychology <strong>of</strong> the stranger", because they refer to<br />
Page 50 <strong>of</strong> 160
traits that are relatively easy to observe in a stranger; other aspects <strong>of</strong> personality that<br />
are more privately held or more context-dependent are excluded from the Big Five.<br />
In many studies, the five factors are not fully orthogonal to one another; that is, the five<br />
factors are not independent. Orthogonality is viewed as desirable by some researchers<br />
because it minimizes redundancy between the dimensions. This is particularly important<br />
when the goal <strong>of</strong> a study is to provide a comprehensive description <strong>of</strong> personality with<br />
as few variables as possible.<br />
Methodological Issues<br />
Factor analysis, the statistical method used to identify the dimensional structure <strong>of</strong><br />
observed variables, lacks a universally recognized basis for choosing among solutions<br />
with different numbers <strong>of</strong> factors. A five factor solution depends on some degree <strong>of</strong><br />
interpretation by the analyst. A larger number <strong>of</strong> factors may underlie these five factors.<br />
This has led to disputes about the "true" number <strong>of</strong> factors. Big Five proponents have<br />
responded that although other solutions may be viable in a single dataset, only the five<br />
factor structure consistently replicates across different studies.<br />
Moreover, the factor analysis that this model is based on is a linear method incapable <strong>of</strong><br />
capturing nonlinear, feedback and contingent relationships between core systems <strong>of</strong><br />
individual differences.<br />
<strong>The</strong>oretical Status<br />
A frequent criticism is that the Big Five is not based on any underlying theory; it is<br />
merely an empirical finding that certain descriptors cluster together under factor<br />
Page 51 <strong>of</strong> 160
analysis. Although this does not mean that these five factors do not exist, the underlying<br />
causes behind them are unknown.<br />
Jack Block's final published work before his death in January 2010 drew together his<br />
lifetime perspective on the five-factor model.<br />
He summarized his critique <strong>of</strong> the model in terms <strong>of</strong>:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
the atheoretical nature <strong>of</strong> the five-factors.<br />
their "cloudy" measurement.<br />
the model's inappropriateness for studying early childhood.<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> factor analysis as the exclusive paradigm for conceptualizing<br />
personality.<br />
the continuing non-consensual understandings <strong>of</strong> the five-factors.<br />
the existence <strong>of</strong> unrecognized but successful efforts to specify aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
character not subsumed by the five-factors.<br />
He went on to suggest that repeatedly observed higher order factors hierarchically<br />
above the proclaimed Big Five personality traits may promise deeper biological<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the origins and implications <strong>of</strong> these superfactors.<br />
Evidence for Six Factors, Rather Than Five<br />
It has been noted that even though early lexical studies in the English language<br />
indicated five large groups <strong>of</strong> personality traits, more recent, and more comprehensive,<br />
cross-language studies have provided evidence for six large groups rather than<br />
five. <strong>The</strong>se six groups forms the basis <strong>of</strong> the HEXACO model <strong>of</strong> personality structure.<br />
Based on these findings it has been suggested that the Big Five system should be<br />
replaced by HEXACO, or revised to better align with lexical evidence.<br />
Page 52 <strong>of</strong> 160
III. Myers-Briggs Indicators<br />
<strong>The</strong> Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is an introspective self-report questionnaire<br />
with the purpose <strong>of</strong> indicating differing psychological preferences in how people<br />
perceive the world around them and make decisions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> MBTI was constructed by Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs<br />
Myers. It is based on the conceptual theory proposed by Carl Jung, who had speculated<br />
that humans experience the world using four principal psychological functions –<br />
sensation, intuition, feeling, and thinking – and that one <strong>of</strong> these four functions is<br />
dominant for a person most <strong>of</strong> the time.<br />
<strong>The</strong> MBTI was constructed for normal populations and emphasizes the value <strong>of</strong><br />
naturally occurring differences. "<strong>The</strong> underlying assumption <strong>of</strong> the MBTI is that we all<br />
have specific preferences in the way we construe our experiences, and these<br />
preferences underlie our interests, needs, values, and motivation."<br />
Although popular in the business sector, the MBTI exhibits significant psychometric<br />
deficiencies, notably including poor validity (i.e. not measuring what it purports to<br />
measure, not having predictive power or not having items that can be generalized),<br />
poor reliability (giving different results for the same person on different occasions),<br />
measuring categories that are not independent (some dichotomous traits have been<br />
noted to correlate with each other), and not being comprehensive (due to<br />
missing neuroticism). <strong>The</strong> four scales used in the MBTI have some correlation with four<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Big Five personality traits, which are a more commonly accepted framework.<br />
Page 53 <strong>of</strong> 160
History<br />
Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myersextrapolated their MBTI theory from Carl<br />
Jung's writings in his book Psychological Types.<br />
Katharine Cook Briggs began her research into personality in 1917. Upon meeting her<br />
future son-in-law, she observed marked differences between his personality and that <strong>of</strong><br />
other family members. Briggs embarked on a project <strong>of</strong> reading biographies, and<br />
subsequently developed a typology wherein she proposed four temperaments:<br />
meditative (or thoughtful), spontaneous, executive, and social.<br />
After the English translation <strong>of</strong> Jung's book Psychological Types was published in 1923<br />
(first published in German in 1921), she recognized that Jung's theory was similar to,<br />
but went far beyond, her own. Briggs's four types were later identified as corresponding<br />
to the IXXXs, EXXPs, EXTJs and EXFJs. Her first publications were two articles<br />
describing Jung's theory, in the journal New Republic in 1926 ("Meet Yourself Using the<br />
Personality Paint Box") and 1928 ("Up From Barbarism"). After extensively studying the<br />
work <strong>of</strong> Jung, they extended their interest in human behavior into efforts to turn the<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> psychological types to practical use.<br />
Briggs's daughter, Isabel Briggs Myers, joined her mother's typological research and<br />
progressively took it over entirely. Myers graduated first in her class from Swarthmore<br />
College in 1919 and wrote a mystery novel, Murder Yet to Come, using typological<br />
ideas in 1929, which won the National Detective Murder Mystery Contest that year.<br />
However, neither Myers nor Briggs was formally educated in the discipline <strong>of</strong><br />
psychology, and both were self-taught in the field <strong>of</strong> psychometric testing. Myers<br />
therefore apprenticed herself to Edward N. Hay, who was then personnel manager for a<br />
large Philadelphia bank and went on to start one <strong>of</strong> the first successful personnel<br />
consulting firms in the United States. From Hay, Myers learned rudimentary test<br />
construction, scoring, validation, and statistical methods.<br />
Briggs and Myers began creating the indicator during World War II in the belief that a<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> personality preferences would help women entering the industrial<br />
workforce for the first time to identify the sort <strong>of</strong> war-time jobs that would be the "most<br />
comfortable and effective" for them. <strong>The</strong> Briggs Myers Type Indicator Handbook was<br />
published in 1944. <strong>The</strong> indicator changed its name to "Myers–Briggs Type Indicator" in<br />
1956. Myers' work attracted the attention <strong>of</strong> Henry Chauncey, head <strong>of</strong> the Educational<br />
Testing Service. Under these auspices, the first MBTI Manual was published in 1962.<br />
<strong>The</strong> MBTI received further support from Donald W. MacKinnon, head <strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Personality and Social Research at the University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley; W. Harold<br />
Grant, a pr<strong>of</strong>essor at Michigan State University and Auburn University; and Mary H.<br />
McCaulley <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Florida. <strong>The</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> the MBTI was transferred to<br />
Consulting Psychologists Press in 1975, and the Center for Applications <strong>of</strong><br />
Psychological Type was founded as a research laboratory.<br />
Page 54 <strong>of</strong> 160
After Myers' death in May 1980, Mary McCaulley updated the MBTI Manual and the<br />
second edition was published in 1985. <strong>The</strong> third edition appeared in 1998.<br />
Origins <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory<br />
Jung's theory <strong>of</strong> psychological types was not based on controlled scientific studies, but<br />
instead on clinical observation, introspection, and anecdote—methods regarded as<br />
inconclusive in the modern field <strong>of</strong> scientific psychology.<br />
Jung's typology theories postulated a sequence <strong>of</strong> four cognitive functions (thinking,<br />
feeling, sensation, and intuition), each having one <strong>of</strong> two polar orientations (extraversion<br />
or introversion), giving a total <strong>of</strong> eight dominant functions. <strong>The</strong> MBTI is based on these<br />
eight hypothetical functions, although with some differences in expression from Jung's<br />
model (see Differences from Jung below).<br />
While the Jungian model <strong>of</strong>fers empirical evidence for the first three dichotomies,<br />
whether the Briggs had evidence for the J-P preference is unclear.<br />
Page 55 <strong>of</strong> 160
Differences from Jung<br />
Structured vs. Projective Personality Assessment<br />
<strong>The</strong> MBTI takes what is called a "structured" approach to personality assessment. <strong>The</strong><br />
responses to items are considered "closed" as they are interpreted according to the<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> the test constructers in scoring. This is contrary to the "projective" approach to<br />
personality assessment advocated by psychodynamic theorists such as Carl Jung.<br />
Indeed, Jung was a proponent <strong>of</strong> the "word association" test, one <strong>of</strong> the measures with<br />
a "projective" approach. This approach uses "open-ended" responses that need to be<br />
interpreted in the context <strong>of</strong> the "whole" person, and not according to the preconceived<br />
theory and concept <strong>of</strong> the test constructers. It reveals how the unconscious dispositions,<br />
such as hidden emotions and internal conflicts, influence behaviour. Supporters <strong>of</strong> the<br />
"projective" approach to personality assessment are critical <strong>of</strong> the "structured" approach<br />
because defense mechanisms may distort responses to the closed items on structured<br />
tests and biases from the constructers may affect result intepretation.<br />
Judging vs. Perception<br />
<strong>The</strong> most notable addition <strong>of</strong> Myers and Briggs ideas to Jung's original thought is their<br />
concept that a given type's fourth letter (J or P) indicates a person's most preferred<br />
extraverted function, which is the dominant function for extraverted types and the<br />
auxiliary function for introverted types.<br />
Orientation <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Tertiary Function<br />
Jung theorized that the dominant function acts alone in its preferred world: exterior for<br />
extraverts and interior for introverts. <strong>The</strong> remaining three functions, he suggested,<br />
operate together in the opposite orientation. If the dominant cognitive function is<br />
introverted the other functions are extraverted and vice versa. <strong>The</strong><br />
MBTI Manual summarizes Jung's work <strong>of</strong> balance in psychological type as follows:<br />
"<strong>The</strong>re are several references in Jung's writing to the three remaining functions having<br />
an opposite attitudinal character. For example, in writing about introverts with thinking<br />
dominant ... Jung commented that the counterbalancing functions have an extraverted<br />
character." However, many MBTI practitioners hold that the tertiary function is oriented<br />
in the same direction as the dominant function. Using the INTP type as an example, the<br />
orientation would be as follows:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Dominant introverted thinking<br />
Auxiliary extraverted intuition<br />
Tertiary introverted sensing<br />
Inferior extraverted feeling<br />
Concepts<br />
Page 56 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> MBTI Manual states that the indicator "is designed to implement a theory; therefore,<br />
the theory must be understood to understand the MBTI". Fundamental to the MBTI is<br />
the theory <strong>of</strong> psychological type as originally developed by Carl Jung. Jung proposed<br />
the existence <strong>of</strong> two dichotomous pairs <strong>of</strong> cognitive functions:<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>The</strong> "rational" (judging) functions: thinking and feeling<br />
<strong>The</strong> "irrational" (perceiving) functions: sensation and intuition<br />
Jung believed that for every person, each <strong>of</strong> the functions is expressed primarily in<br />
either an introverted or extraverted form. Based on Jung's original concepts, Briggs and<br />
Myers developed their own theory <strong>of</strong> psychological type,<br />
described below, on which<br />
the MBTI is based. However,<br />
although<br />
psychologist Hans<br />
Eysenck called the MBTI a moderately<br />
successful<br />
quantification <strong>of</strong> Jung's<br />
original principles as outlined<br />
in Psychological Types, he also said,<br />
"[<strong>The</strong> MBTI] creates 16<br />
personality types which<br />
are said to be similar to Jung's theoretical<br />
concepts. I have always<br />
found difficulties with<br />
this identification, which<br />
omits one half <strong>of</strong> Jung's<br />
theory (he had 32 types, by<br />
asserting that for every<br />
conscious combination <strong>of</strong> traits there was an<br />
opposite unconscious one). Obviously, the latter half <strong>of</strong><br />
his theory does not admit <strong>of</strong> questionnaire measurement,<br />
but to leave it out and pretend that the scales measure Jungian concepts is hardly fair to<br />
Jung." In any event, both models remain hypothetical, with no controlled scientific<br />
studies supporting either Jung's original concept <strong>of</strong> type or the Myers–Briggs variation.<br />
Type<br />
Jung's typological model regards psychological type as similar to left or<br />
right handedness: people are either born with, or develop, certain preferred ways <strong>of</strong><br />
perceiving and deciding. <strong>The</strong> MBTI sorts some <strong>of</strong> these psychological differences into<br />
four opposite pairs, or "dichotomies", with a resulting 16 possible psychological types.<br />
None <strong>of</strong> these types is "better" or "worse"; however, Briggs and Myers theorized that<br />
people innately "prefer" one overall combination <strong>of</strong> type differences. In the same way<br />
that writing with the left hand is difficult for a right-hander, so people tend to find using<br />
their opposite psychological preferences more difficult, though they can become more<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>icient (and therefore behaviorally flexible) with practice and development.<br />
<strong>The</strong> 16 types are typically referred to by an abbreviation <strong>of</strong> four letters—the initial letters<br />
<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> their four type preferences (except in the case <strong>of</strong> intuition, which uses the<br />
abbreviation "N" to distinguish it from introversion). For instance:<br />
Page 57 <strong>of</strong> 160
ESTJ: extraversion (E), sensing (S), thinking (T), judgment (J)<br />
INFP: introversion (I), intuition (N), feeling (F), perception (P)<br />
<strong>The</strong>se abbreviations are applied to all 16 types.<br />
Four Dichotomies<br />
Carl Jung<br />
Subjective Objective<br />
Perception Intuition/Sensing <strong>Introversion</strong>/Extraversion 1<br />
Judging Feeling/Thinking <strong>Introversion</strong>/Extraversion 2<br />
Myers–Briggs<br />
Subjective Objective<br />
Deductive Intuition/Sensing <strong>Introversion</strong>/Extraversion<br />
Inductive Feeling/Thinking Perception/Judging<br />
<strong>The</strong> terms used for each dichotomy have specific technical meanings relating to the<br />
MBTI, which differ from their everyday usage. For example, people who prefer judgment<br />
over perception are not necessarily more "judgmental" or less "perceptive", nor does the<br />
MBTI instrument measure aptitude; it simply indicates for one preference over<br />
another. Someone reporting a high score for extraversion over introversion cannot be<br />
correctly described as more extraverted: they simply have a clear preference.<br />
Point scores on each <strong>of</strong> the dichotomies can vary considerably from person to person,<br />
even among those with the same type. However, Isabel Myers considered the direction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the preference (for example, E vs. I) to be more important than the degree <strong>of</strong> the<br />
preference (for example, very clear vs. slight). <strong>The</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> a person's<br />
psychological type is more than the sum <strong>of</strong> the four individual preferences. <strong>The</strong><br />
preferences interact through type dynamics and type development.<br />
Attitudes: Extraversion/<strong>Introversion</strong><br />
Myers–Briggs literature uses the terms extraversion and introversion as Jung first used<br />
them. Extraversion means literally outward-turning and introversion, inwardturning.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se specific definitions differ somewhat from the popular usage <strong>of</strong> the words.<br />
Extraversion is the spelling used in MBTI publications.<br />
<strong>The</strong> preferences for extraversion and introversion are <strong>of</strong>ten called "attitudes". Briggs<br />
and Myers recognized that each <strong>of</strong> the cognitive functions can operate in the external<br />
world <strong>of</strong> behavior, action, people, and things ("extraverted attitude") or the internal world<br />
<strong>of</strong> ideas and reflection ("introverted attitude"). <strong>The</strong> MBTI assessment sorts for an overall<br />
preference for one or the other.<br />
People who prefer extraversion draw energy from action: they tend to act, then reflect,<br />
then act further. If they are inactive, their motivation tends to decline. To rebuild their<br />
Page 58 <strong>of</strong> 160
energy, extraverts need breaks from time spent in reflection. Conversely, those who<br />
prefer introversion "expend" energy through action: they prefer to reflect, then act, then<br />
reflect again. To rebuild their energy, introverts need quiet time alone, away from<br />
activity.<br />
An extravert's flow is directed outward toward people and objects, whereas the<br />
introvert's is directed inward toward concepts and ideas. Contrasting characteristics<br />
between extraverted and introverted people include:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Extraverted are action-oriented, while introverted are thought-oriented.<br />
Extraverted seek breadth <strong>of</strong> knowledge and influence, while introverted seek<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> knowledge and influence.<br />
Extraverted <strong>of</strong>ten prefer more frequent interaction, while introverted prefer more<br />
substantial interaction.<br />
Extraverted recharge and get their energy from spending time with people, while<br />
introverted recharge and get their energy from spending time alone; they<br />
consume their energy through the opposite process.<br />
Functions: Sensing/Intuition and Thinking/Feeling<br />
Jung identified two pairs <strong>of</strong> psychological functions:<br />
<br />
Two perceiving functions: sensation (usually called sensing in MBTI writings)<br />
and intuition<br />
Page 59 <strong>of</strong> 160
Two judging functions: thinking and feeling<br />
According to Jung's typology model, each person uses one <strong>of</strong> these four functions more<br />
dominantly and pr<strong>of</strong>iciently than the other three; however, all four functions are used at<br />
different times depending on the circumstances.<br />
Sensing and intuition are the information-gathering (perceiving) functions. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
describe how new information is understood and interpreted. People who prefer sensing<br />
are more likely to trust information that is in the present, tangible, and concrete: that is,<br />
information that can be understood by the five senses. <strong>The</strong>y tend to distrust hunches,<br />
which seem to come "out <strong>of</strong> nowhere". <strong>The</strong>y prefer to look for details and facts. For<br />
them, the meaning is in the data. On the other hand, those who prefer intuition tend to<br />
trust information that is less dependent upon the senses, that can be associated with<br />
other information (either remembered or discovered by seeking a wider context or<br />
pattern). <strong>The</strong>y may be more interested in future possibilities. For them, the meaning is in<br />
the underlying theory and principles which are manifested in the data.<br />
Thinking and feeling are the decision-making (judging) functions. <strong>The</strong> thinking and<br />
feeling functions are both used to make rational decisions, based on the data received<br />
from their information-gathering functions (sensing or intuition). Those who prefer<br />
thinking tend to decide things from a more detached standpoint, measuring the decision<br />
by what seems reasonable, logical, causal, consistent, and matching a given set <strong>of</strong><br />
rules. Those who prefer feeling tend to come to decisions by associating or empathizing<br />
with the situation, looking at it 'from the inside' and weighing the situation to achieve, on<br />
balance, the greatest harmony, consensus and fit, considering the needs <strong>of</strong> the people<br />
involved. Thinkers usually have trouble interacting with people who are inconsistent or<br />
illogical, and tend to give very direct feedback to others. <strong>The</strong>y are concerned with the<br />
truth and view it as more important.<br />
As noted already, people who prefer thinking do not necessarily, in the everyday sense,<br />
"think better" than their feeling counterparts, in the common sense; the opposite<br />
preference is considered an equally rational way <strong>of</strong> coming to decisions (and, in any<br />
case, the MBTI assessment is a measure <strong>of</strong> preference, not ability). Similarly, those<br />
who prefer feeling do not necessarily have "better" emotional reactions than their<br />
thinking counterparts. In many cases, however, people who use thinking functions as<br />
either dominant or auxiliary tend to have more underdeveloped feeling functions, and<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten have more trouble with regulating and making healthy and productive decisions<br />
based on their feelings.<br />
Dominant Function<br />
A diagram depicting the cognitive functions <strong>of</strong> each type: A type's background color<br />
represents its dominant function and its text color represents its auxiliary function.<br />
According to Jung, people use all four cognitive functions. However, one function is<br />
generally used in a more conscious and confident way. This dominant function is<br />
Page 60 <strong>of</strong> 160
supported by the secondary (auxiliary) function, and to a lesser degree the tertiary<br />
function. <strong>The</strong> fourth and least conscious function is always the opposite <strong>of</strong> the dominant<br />
function. Myers called this inferior function the "shadow".<br />
<strong>The</strong> four functions operate in conjunction with the attitudes (extraversion and<br />
introversion). Each function is used in either an extraverted or introverted way. A person<br />
whose dominant function is extraverted intuition, for example, uses intuition very<br />
differently from someone whose dominant function is introverted intuition.<br />
Lifestyle Preferences: Judging/Perception<br />
Myers and Briggs added another dimension to Jung's typological model by identifying<br />
that people also have a preference for using either the judging function (thinking or<br />
feeling) or their perceiving function (sensing or intuition) when relating to the outside<br />
world (extraversion).<br />
Myers and Briggs held that types with a preference for judging show the world their<br />
preferred judging function (thinking or feeling). So, TJ types tend to appear to the world<br />
as logical and FJ types as empathetic. According to Myers, judging types like to "have<br />
matters settled".<br />
Page 61 <strong>of</strong> 160
Those types who prefer perception show the world their preferred perceiving function<br />
(sensing or intuition). So, SP types tend to appear to the world as concrete and NP<br />
types as abstract. According to Myers, perceptive types prefer to "keep decisions open".<br />
For extraverts, the J or P indicates their dominant function; for introverts, the J or P<br />
indicates their auxiliary function. Introverts tend to show their dominant function<br />
outwardly only in matters "important to their inner worlds". For example:<br />
Because the ENTJ type is extraverted, the J indicates that the dominant function is the<br />
preferred judging function (extraverted thinking). <strong>The</strong> ENTJ type introverts the auxiliary<br />
perceiving function (introverted intuition). <strong>The</strong> tertiary function is sensing and the inferior<br />
function is introverted feeling.<br />
Because the INTJ type is introverted, however, the J instead indicates that the auxiliary<br />
function is the preferred judging function (extraverted thinking). <strong>The</strong> INTJ type introverts<br />
the dominant perceiving function (introverted intuition). <strong>The</strong> tertiary function is feeling and<br />
the inferior function is extraverted sensing.<br />
Format and Administration<br />
<strong>The</strong> current North American English version <strong>of</strong> the MBTI Step I includes 93 forcedchoice<br />
questions (88 are in the European English version). "Forced-choice" means that<br />
a person has to choose only one <strong>of</strong> two possible answers to each question. <strong>The</strong> choices<br />
are a mixture <strong>of</strong> word pairs and short statements. Choices are not literal opposites, but<br />
chosen to reflect opposite preferences on the same dichotomy. Participants may skip<br />
questions if they feel they are unable to choose.<br />
Using psychometric techniques, such as item response theory, the MBTI will then be<br />
scored and will attempt to identify the preference, and clarity <strong>of</strong> preference, in each<br />
dichotomy. After taking the MBTI, participants are usually asked to complete a "Best Fit"<br />
exercise (see below) and then given a readout <strong>of</strong> their Reported Type, which will usually<br />
include a bar graph and number (Preference Clarity Index) to show how clear they were<br />
about each preference when they completed the questionnaire.<br />
During the early development <strong>of</strong> the MBTI, thousands <strong>of</strong> items were used. Most were<br />
eventually discarded because they did not have high "midpoint discrimination", meaning<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> that one item did not, on average, move an individual score away from the<br />
midpoint. Using only items with high midpoint discrimination allows the MBTI to have<br />
fewer items on it, but still provide as much statistical information as other instruments<br />
with many more items with lower midpoint discrimination.<br />
Additional Formats<br />
Isabel Myers had noted that people <strong>of</strong> any given type shared differences, as well as<br />
similarities. At the time <strong>of</strong> her death, she was developing a more in-depth method <strong>of</strong><br />
measuring how people express and experience their individual type pattern.<br />
Page 62 <strong>of</strong> 160
In 1987, an advanced scoring system was developed for the MBTI. From this was<br />
developed the Type Differentiation Indicator (Saunders, 1989) which is a scoring system<br />
for the longer MBTI, Form J, which includes the 290 items written by Myers that had<br />
survived her previous item analyses. It yields 20 subscales (five under each <strong>of</strong> the four<br />
dichotomous preference scales), plus seven additional subscales for a new "Comfort-<br />
Discomfort" factor (which purportedly corresponds to the missing factor <strong>of</strong> neuroticism).<br />
This factor's scales indicate a sense <strong>of</strong> overall comfort and confidence versus<br />
discomfort and anxiety. <strong>The</strong>y also load onto one <strong>of</strong> the four type dimensions: guardedoptimistic<br />
(also T/F), defiant-compliant (also T/F), carefree-worried (also T/F), decisiveambivalent<br />
(also J/P), intrepid-inhibited (Also E/I), leader-follower (Also E/I), and<br />
proactive-distractible (also J/P)<br />
Also included is a composite <strong>of</strong> these called "strain". <strong>The</strong>re are also scales for typescale<br />
consistency and comfort-scale consistency. Reliability <strong>of</strong> 23 <strong>of</strong> the 27 TDI<br />
subscales is greater than 0.50, "an acceptable result given the brevity <strong>of</strong> the subscales"<br />
(Saunders, 1989).<br />
In 1989, a scoring system was developed for only the 20 subscales for the original four<br />
dichotomies. This was initially known as "Form K" or the "Expanded Analysis Report".<br />
This tool is now called the "MBTI Step II".<br />
Form J or the TDI included the items (derived from Myers' and McCaulley's earlier work)<br />
necessary to score what became known as "Step III". (<strong>The</strong> 1998 MBTI Manual reported<br />
that the two instruments were one and the same) It was developed in a joint project<br />
involving the following organizations: CPP, the publisher <strong>of</strong> the whole family <strong>of</strong> MBTI<br />
works; CAPT (Center for Applications <strong>of</strong> Psychological Type), which holds all <strong>of</strong> Myers'<br />
Page 63 <strong>of</strong> 160
and McCaulley's original work; and the MBTI Trust, headed by Katharine and Peter<br />
Myers. Step III was advertised as addressing type development and the use <strong>of</strong><br />
perception and judgment by respondents.<br />
Translations Into Other Languages<br />
<strong>The</strong> MBTI has been successfully translated and adapted into over 20<br />
languages, including reviews by subject-matter experts fluent in the native language,<br />
and statistical analysis to check that the questions still measure the same psychological<br />
concepts as the original US English questionnaire.<br />
Precepts and Ethics<br />
<strong>The</strong>se precepts are generally used in the ethical administration <strong>of</strong> the MBTI:<br />
Type Not Trait<br />
<strong>The</strong> MBTI sorts for type; it does not indicate the strength <strong>of</strong> ability. It allows the clarity <strong>of</strong><br />
a preference to be ascertained (Bill clearly prefers introversion), but not the strength <strong>of</strong><br />
preference (Jane strongly prefers extraversion) or degree <strong>of</strong> aptitude (Harry is good at<br />
thinking). In this sense, it differs from trait-based tools such as 16PF. Type preferences<br />
are polar opposites: a precept <strong>of</strong> MBTI is that people fundamentally prefer one thing<br />
over the other, not a bit <strong>of</strong> both.<br />
Own Best Judge<br />
People are considered the best judge <strong>of</strong> their own type. While the MBTI provides a<br />
Reported Type, this is considered only an indication <strong>of</strong> their probable overall Type. A<br />
Best Fit Process is usually used to allow respondents to develop their understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
the four dichotomies, to form their own hypothesis as to their overall Type, and to<br />
compare this against the Reported Type. In more than 20% <strong>of</strong> cases, the hypothesis<br />
and the Reported Type differ in one or more dichotomies. Using the clarity <strong>of</strong> each<br />
preference, any potential for bias in the report, and <strong>of</strong>ten, a comparison <strong>of</strong> two or more<br />
whole Types may then help respondents determine their own Best Fit.<br />
No Right or Wrong<br />
No preference or total type is considered better or worse than another. <strong>The</strong>y are all<br />
'<strong>Gift</strong>s Differing', as emphasized by the title <strong>of</strong> Isabel Briggs Myers' book on this subject.<br />
Voluntary<br />
Compelling anyone to take the MBTI is considered unethical. It should always be taken<br />
voluntarily.<br />
Confidentiality<br />
Page 64 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> the MBTI Reported and Best Fit type are confidential between the<br />
individual and administrator, and ethically, not for disclosure without permission.<br />
Not for Selection<br />
<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the assessment should not be used to "label, evaluate, or limit the<br />
respondent in any way" (emphasis original). Since all types are valuable, and the MBTI<br />
measures preferences rather than aptitude, the MBTI is not considered a proper<br />
instrument for purposes <strong>of</strong> employment selection. Many pr<strong>of</strong>essions contain highly<br />
competent individuals <strong>of</strong> different types with complementary preferences.<br />
Importance <strong>of</strong> Proper Feedback<br />
People should always be given detailed feedback from a trained administrator and an<br />
opportunity to undertake a Best Fit exercise to check against their Reported Type. This<br />
feedback can be given in person, by telephone or electronically.<br />
Type dynamics and development:<br />
<strong>The</strong> Sixteen Types<br />
US Population Breakdown<br />
<strong>The</strong> table organizing the sixteen types was<br />
created by Isabel Myers (an INFP person).<br />
ISTJ<br />
11–14%<br />
ISTP<br />
4–6%<br />
ESTP<br />
4–5%<br />
ESTJ<br />
8–12%<br />
ISFJ<br />
9–14%<br />
ISFP<br />
5–9%<br />
ESFP<br />
4–9%<br />
ESFJ<br />
9–13%<br />
INFJ<br />
1–3%<br />
INFP<br />
4–5%<br />
ENFP<br />
6–8%<br />
ENFJ<br />
2–5%<br />
INTJ<br />
2–4%<br />
INTP<br />
3–5%<br />
ENTP<br />
2–5%<br />
ENTJ<br />
2–5%<br />
Estimated percentages <strong>of</strong> the 16 types<br />
in the United States population.<br />
<strong>The</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> two, three, or four preferences is known as "type dynamics". Although<br />
type dynamics has received little or no empirical support to substantiate its viability as<br />
a scientific theory, Myers and Briggs asserted that for each <strong>of</strong> the 16 four-preference<br />
types, one function is the most dominant and is likely to be evident earliest in life. A<br />
secondary or auxiliary function typically becomes more evident (differentiated) during<br />
teenaged years and provides balance to the dominant. In normal development,<br />
individuals tend to become more fluent with a third, tertiary function during mid-life,<br />
while the fourth, inferior function remains least consciously developed. <strong>The</strong> inferior<br />
Page 65 <strong>of</strong> 160
function is <strong>of</strong>ten considered to be more associated with the unconscious, being most<br />
evident in situations such as high stress (sometimes referred to as being "in the grip" <strong>of</strong><br />
the inferior function).<br />
However, the use <strong>of</strong> type dynamics is disputed: in the conclusion <strong>of</strong> various studies on<br />
the subject <strong>of</strong> type dynamics, James H. Reynierse writes, "Type dynamics has<br />
persistent logical problems and is fundamentally based on a series <strong>of</strong> category<br />
mistakes; it provides, at best, a limited and incomplete account <strong>of</strong> type related<br />
phenomena"; and "type dynamics relies on anecdotal evidence, fails most efficacy tests,<br />
and does not fit the empirical facts". His studies gave the clear result that the<br />
descriptions and workings <strong>of</strong> type dynamics do not fit the real behavior <strong>of</strong> people. He<br />
suggests getting completely rid <strong>of</strong> type dynamics, because it does not help, but hinders<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> personality. <strong>The</strong> presumed order <strong>of</strong> functions 1 to 4 did only occur in<br />
one out <strong>of</strong> 540 test results.<br />
<strong>The</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> differentiation <strong>of</strong> dominant, auxiliary, and tertiary functions through life<br />
is termed type development. This is an idealized sequence that may be disrupted by<br />
major life events.<br />
<strong>The</strong> dynamic sequence <strong>of</strong> functions and their attitudes can be determined in the<br />
following way:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>The</strong> overall lifestyle preference (J-P) determines whether the judging (T-F) or<br />
perceiving (S-N) preference is most evident in the outside world; i.e., which<br />
function has an extraverted attitude<br />
<strong>The</strong> attitude preference (E-I) determines whether the extraverted function is<br />
dominant or auxiliary<br />
For those with an overall preference for extraversion, the function with<br />
the extraverted attitude will be the dominant function. For example, for an ESTJ<br />
type the dominant function is the judging function, thinking, and this is<br />
experienced with an extraverted attitude. This is notated as a dominant Te. For<br />
an ESTP, the dominant function is the perceiving function, sensing, notated as a<br />
dominant Se.<br />
<strong>The</strong> auxiliary function for extraverts is the secondary preference <strong>of</strong> the judging or<br />
perceiving functions, and it is experienced with an introverted attitude: for<br />
example, the auxiliary function for ESTJ is introverted sensing (Si) and the<br />
auxiliary for ESTP is introverted thinking (Ti).<br />
For those with an overall preference for introversion, the function with the<br />
extraverted attitude is the auxiliary; the dominant is the other function in the main<br />
four letter preference. So the dominant function for ISTJ is introverted sensing<br />
(Si) with the auxiliary (supporting) function being extraverted thinking (Te).<br />
Page 66 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> tertiary function is the opposite preference from the auxiliary. For example, if<br />
the Auxiliary is thinking then the Tertiary would be feeling. <strong>The</strong> attitude <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tertiary is the subject <strong>of</strong> some debate and therefore is not normally indicated; i.e.<br />
if the auxiliary was Te then the tertiary would be F (not Fe or Fi)<br />
<strong>The</strong> inferior function is the opposite preference and attitude from the Dominant,<br />
so for an ESTJ with dominant Te the inferior would be Fi.<br />
Note that for extraverts, the dominant function is the one most evident in the external<br />
world. For introverts, however, it is the auxiliary function that is most evident externally,<br />
as their dominant function relates to the interior world.<br />
Some examples <strong>of</strong> whole types may clarify this further. Taking the ESTJ example<br />
above:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Extraverted function is a judging function (T-F) because <strong>of</strong> the overall J<br />
preference<br />
Extraverted function is dominant because <strong>of</strong> overall E preference<br />
Dominant function is therefore extraverted thinking (Te)<br />
Auxiliary function is the preferred perceiving function: introverted sensing (Si)<br />
Tertiary function is the opposite <strong>of</strong> the Auxiliary: intuition (N)<br />
Inferior function is the opposite <strong>of</strong> the Dominant: introverted feeling (Fi)<br />
Page 67 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> the ESTJ are found in the primary combination <strong>of</strong> extraverted thinking<br />
as their dominant function and introverted sensing as their auxiliary function: the<br />
dominant tendency <strong>of</strong> ESTJs to order their environment, to set clear boundaries, to<br />
clarify roles and timetables, and to direct the activities around them is supported by their<br />
facility for using past experience in an ordered and systematic way to help organize<br />
themselves and others. For instance, ESTJs may enjoy planning trips for groups <strong>of</strong><br />
people to achieve some goal or to perform some culturally uplifting function. Because <strong>of</strong><br />
their ease in directing others and their facility in managing their own time, they engage<br />
all the resources at their disposal to achieve their goals. However, under prolonged<br />
stress or sudden trauma, ESTJs may overuse their extraverted thinking function and fall<br />
into the grip <strong>of</strong> their inferior function, introverted feeling. Although the ESTJ can seem<br />
insensitive to the feelings <strong>of</strong> others in their normal activities, under tremendous stress,<br />
they can suddenly express feelings <strong>of</strong> being unappreciated or wounded by insensitivity.<br />
Looking at the diametrically opposite four-letter type, INFP:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Extraverted function is a perceiving function (S-N) because <strong>of</strong> the P preference<br />
Introverted function is dominant because <strong>of</strong> the I preference<br />
Dominant function is therefore introverted feeling (Fi)<br />
Auxiliary function is extraverted intuition (Ne)<br />
Tertiary function is the opposite <strong>of</strong> the Auxiliary: sensing (S)<br />
Inferior function is the opposite <strong>of</strong> the Dominant: extraverted thinking (Te)<br />
<strong>The</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> the INFP rest on the fundamental correspondence <strong>of</strong> introverted<br />
feeling and extraverted intuition. <strong>The</strong> dominant tendency <strong>of</strong> the INFP is toward building<br />
a rich internal framework <strong>of</strong> values and toward championing human rights. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
devote themselves behind the scenes to causes such as civil rights or saving the<br />
environment. Since they tend to avoid the limelight, postpone decisions, and maintain a<br />
reserved posture, they are rarely found in executive-director-type positions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
organizations that serve those causes.<br />
Normally, the INFP dislikes being "in charge" <strong>of</strong> things. When not under stress, the<br />
INFP radiates a pleasant and sympathetic demeanor, but under extreme stress, they<br />
can suddenly become rigid and directive, exerting their extraverted thinking erratically.<br />
Every type, and its opposite, is the expression <strong>of</strong> these interactions, which give each<br />
type its unique, recognizable signature.<br />
Cognitive Learning Styles<br />
<strong>The</strong> test is scored by evaluating each answer in terms <strong>of</strong> what it reveals about the taker.<br />
Each question is relevant to one <strong>of</strong> the following cognitive learning styles. Each is not a<br />
polar opposite, but a gradual continuum.<br />
Page 68 <strong>of</strong> 160
Extraversion/<strong>Introversion</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> extraverted types learn best by talking and interacting with others. By interacting<br />
with the physical world, extraverts can process and make sense <strong>of</strong> new information. <strong>The</strong><br />
introverted types prefer quiet reflection and privacy. Information processing occurs for<br />
introverts as they explore ideas and concepts internally.<br />
Sensing/Intuition<br />
<strong>The</strong> second continuum reflects what people focus their attentions on. Sensing types<br />
enjoy a learning environment in which the material is presented in a detailed and<br />
sequential manner. Sensing types <strong>of</strong>ten attend to what is occurring in the present, and<br />
can move to the abstract after they have established a concrete experience. Intuitive<br />
types prefer a learning atmosphere in which an emphasis is placed on meaning and<br />
associations. Insight is valued higher than careful observation, and pattern recognition<br />
occurs naturally for intuitive types.<br />
Thinking/Feeling<br />
<strong>The</strong> third continuum reflects a person's decision preferences. Thinking types desire<br />
objective truth and logical principles and are natural at deductive reasoning. Feeling<br />
types place an emphasis on issues and causes that can be personalized while they<br />
consider other people's motives.<br />
Page 69 <strong>of</strong> 160
Judging/Perceiving<br />
<strong>The</strong> fourth continuum reflects how a person regards complexity. Judging types will<br />
thrive when information is organized and structured, and they will be motivated to<br />
complete assignments in order to gain closure. Perceiving types will flourish in a flexible<br />
learning environment in which they are stimulated by new and exciting ideas. Judging<br />
types like to be on time, while perceiving types may be late and/or procrastinate.<br />
Correlations with other instruments<br />
Keirsey Temperaments<br />
David W. Keirsey mapped four "temperaments" to the existing Myers–Briggs system<br />
groupings: SP, SJ, NF and NT; this <strong>of</strong>ten results in confusion <strong>of</strong> the two theories.<br />
However, the Keirsey Temperament Sorter is not directly associated with the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
Myers–Briggs Type Indicator.<br />
Big Five<br />
McCrae and Costa based their Five Factor Model (FFM) on Goldberg's Big Five<br />
theory. McCrae and Costa present correlations between the MBTI scales and the<br />
currently popular Big Five personality constructs measured, for example, by the NEO-<br />
PI-R. <strong>The</strong> five purported personality constructs have been labeled: extraversion,<br />
openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism (emotional instability),<br />
although there is not universal agreement on the Big Five theory and the related Five-<br />
Factor Model (FFM). <strong>The</strong> following study is based on the results from 267 men followed<br />
as part <strong>of</strong> a longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> aging. (Similar results were obtained with 201 women.)<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that the four MBTI scales can be incorporated within the Big<br />
Five personality trait constructs, but that the MBTI lacks a measure for emotional<br />
stability dimension <strong>of</strong> the Big Five (though the TDI, discussed above, has addressed<br />
that dimension). Emotional stability (or neuroticism) is a predictor <strong>of</strong> depression and<br />
anxiety disorders. <strong>The</strong>se correlations refer to the second letter shown, i.e., the table<br />
shows that I and P have negative correlations with extraversion and conscientiousness,<br />
respectively, while F and N have positive correlations with agreeableness and<br />
openness, respectively.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se findings led McCrae and Costa to conclude that, "correlational analyses showed<br />
that the four MBTI indices did measure aspects <strong>of</strong> four <strong>of</strong> the five major dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />
normal personality. <strong>The</strong> five-factor model provides an alternative basis for interpreting<br />
MBTI findings within a broader, more commonly shared conceptual framework."<br />
However, "there was no support for the view that the MBTI measures truly dichotomous<br />
preferences or qualitatively distinct types, instead, the instrument measures four<br />
relatively independent dimensions."<br />
Page 70 <strong>of</strong> 160
Personality Disorders<br />
One study found personality disorders as described by the DSM overall to correlate<br />
modestly with I, N, T, and P, although the associations varied significantly by disorder.<br />
<strong>The</strong> only two disorders with significant correlations <strong>of</strong> all four MBTI dimensions<br />
were schizotypal(INTP) and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (ISTJ).<br />
Criticism<br />
<strong>The</strong> validity (statistical validity and test validity) <strong>of</strong> the MBTI as a psychometric<br />
instrument has been the subject <strong>of</strong> much criticism.<br />
It has been estimated that between a third and a half <strong>of</strong> the published material on the<br />
MBTI has been produced for the special conferences <strong>of</strong> the Center for the Application <strong>of</strong><br />
Psychological Type (which provide the training in the MBTI, and are funded by sales <strong>of</strong><br />
the MBTI) or as papers in the Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychological Type (which is edited and<br />
supported by Myers–Briggs advocates and by sales <strong>of</strong> the indicator). It has been argued<br />
that this reflects a lack <strong>of</strong> critical scrutiny. Many <strong>of</strong> the studies that endorse MBTI are<br />
methodologically weak or unscientific. A 1996 review by Gardner and Martinko<br />
concluded: "It is clear that efforts to detect simplistic linkages between type preferences<br />
and managerial effectiveness have been disappointing. Indeed, given the mixed quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> research and the inconsistent findings, no definitive conclusion regarding these<br />
relationships can be drawn."<br />
Page 71 <strong>of</strong> 160
Psychometric specialist Robert Hogan wrote: "Most personality psychologists regard the<br />
MBTI as little more than an elaborate Chinese fortune cookie ..."<br />
No Evidence for Dichotomies<br />
As described in the § Four dichotomies section, Isabel Myers considered the direction <strong>of</strong><br />
the preference (for example, E vs. I) to be more important than the degree <strong>of</strong> the<br />
preference. Statistically, this would mean that scores on each MBTI scale would show<br />
a bimodal distribution with most people scoring near the ends <strong>of</strong> the scales, thus<br />
dividing people into either, e.g., an extroverted or an introverted psychological type.<br />
However, most studies have found that scores on the individual scales were actually<br />
distributed in a centrally peaked manner, similar to a normal distribution, indicating that<br />
the majority <strong>of</strong> people were actually in the middle <strong>of</strong> the scale and were thus neither<br />
clearly introverted nor extroverted. Most personality traits do show a normal distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> scores from low to high, with about 15% <strong>of</strong> people at the low end, about 15% at the<br />
high end and the majority <strong>of</strong> people in the middle ranges. But in order for the MBTI to be<br />
scored, a cut-<strong>of</strong>f line is used at the middle <strong>of</strong> each scale and all those scoring below the<br />
line are classified as a low type and those scoring above the line are given the opposite<br />
type. Thus, psychometric assessment research fails to support the concept <strong>of</strong> type, but<br />
rather shows that most people lie near the middle <strong>of</strong> a continuous<br />
curve. [9][38][46][47][48] "Although we do not conclude that the absence <strong>of</strong> bimodality<br />
necessarily proves that the MBTI developers' theory-based assumption <strong>of</strong> categorical<br />
"types" <strong>of</strong> personality is invalid, the absence <strong>of</strong> empirical bimodality in IRTbased<br />
research <strong>of</strong> MBTI scores does indeed remove a potentially powerful line <strong>of</strong><br />
evidence that was previously available to "type" advocates to cite in defense <strong>of</strong> their<br />
position."<br />
Validity and Utility<br />
<strong>The</strong> content <strong>of</strong> the MBTI scales is problematic. In 1991, a National Academy <strong>of</strong><br />
Sciences committee reviewed data from MBTI research studies and concluded that only<br />
the I-E scale has high correlations with comparable scales <strong>of</strong> other instruments and low<br />
correlations with instruments designed to assess different concepts, showing strong<br />
validity. In contrast, the S-N and T-F scales show relatively weak validity. <strong>The</strong> 1991<br />
review committee concluded at the time there was "not sufficient, well-designed<br />
research to justify the use <strong>of</strong> the MBTI in career counseling programs". This study<br />
based its measurement <strong>of</strong> validity on "criterion-related validity (i.e., does the MBTI<br />
predict specific outcomes related to interpersonal relations or career success/job<br />
performance?)." <strong>The</strong>re is insufficient evidence to make claims about utility, particularly<br />
<strong>of</strong> the four letter type derived from a person's responses to the MBTI items.<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> Objectivity<br />
<strong>The</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> the MBTI depends on honest self-reporting. Unlike some personality<br />
questionnaires, such as the 16PF Questionnaire, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality<br />
Page 72 <strong>of</strong> 160
Inventory, or the Personality Assessment Inventory, the MBTI does not use validity<br />
scales to assess exaggerated or socially desirable responses. As a result, individuals<br />
motivated to do so can fake their responses, and one study found that the MBTI<br />
judgment/perception dimension correlates weakly with the Eysenck Personality<br />
Questionnaire lie scale. If respondents "fear they have something to lose, they may<br />
answer as they assume they should." However, the MBTI ethical guidelines state, "It is<br />
unethical and in many cases illegal to require job applicants to take the Indicator if the<br />
results will be used to screen out applicants." <strong>The</strong> intent <strong>of</strong> the MBTI is to provide "a<br />
framework for understanding individual differences, and ... a dynamic model <strong>of</strong><br />
individual development".<br />
Terminology<br />
<strong>The</strong> terminology <strong>of</strong> the MBTI has been criticized as being very "vague and general", so<br />
as to allow any kind <strong>of</strong> behavior to fit any personality type, which may result in the Forer<br />
effect, where people give a high rating to a positive description that supposedly applies<br />
specifically to them. Others argue that while the MBTI type descriptions are brief, they<br />
are also distinctive and precise. Some theorists, such as David Keirsey, have expanded<br />
on the MBTI descriptions, providing even greater detail. For instance, Keirsey's<br />
descriptions <strong>of</strong> his four temperaments, which he correlated with the sixteen MBTI<br />
personality types, show how the temperaments differ in terms <strong>of</strong> language use,<br />
intellectual orientation, educational and vocational interests, social orientation, selfimage,<br />
personal values, social roles, and characteristic hand gestures.<br />
Factor Analysis<br />
Researchers have reported that the JP and the SN scales correlate with one<br />
another. One factor-analytic study based on (N=1291) college-aged students found six<br />
Page 73 <strong>of</strong> 160
different factors instead <strong>of</strong> the four purported dimensions, thereby raising doubts as to<br />
the construct validity <strong>of</strong> the MBTI.<br />
Correlates<br />
According to Hans Eysenck: "<strong>The</strong> main dimension in the MBTI is called E-I, or<br />
extraversion-introversion; this is mostly a sociability scale, correlating quite well with the<br />
MMPI social introversion scale (negatively) and the Eysenck Extraversion scale<br />
(positively). Unfortunately, the scale also has a loading on neuroticism, which correlates<br />
with the introverted end. Thus introversion correlates roughly (i.e. averaging values for<br />
males and females) -.44 with dominance, -.24 with aggression, +.37 with abasement,<br />
+.46 with counselling readiness, -.52 with self-confidence, -.36 with personal<br />
adjustment, and -.45 with empathy. <strong>The</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> the scale to disentangle <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
and Neuroticism (there is no scale for neurotic and other psychopathological attributes<br />
in the MBTI) is its worst feature, only equalled by the failure to use factor analysis in<br />
order to test the arrangement <strong>of</strong> items in the scale."<br />
Reliability<br />
<strong>The</strong> test-retest reliability <strong>of</strong> the MBTI tends to be low. Large numbers <strong>of</strong> people<br />
(between 39% and 76% <strong>of</strong> respondents) obtain different type classifications when<br />
retaking the indicator after only five weeks.<br />
In Fortune Magazine (May 15, 2013), an article titled "Have we all been duped by the<br />
Myers-Briggs Test" stated:<br />
<strong>The</strong> interesting – and somewhat alarming – fact about the MBTI is that, despite its<br />
popularity, it has been subject to sustained criticism by pr<strong>of</strong>essional psychologists for<br />
over three decades. One problem is that it displays what statisticians call low "test-retest<br />
reliability." So if you retake the test after only a five-week gap, there's around a 50%<br />
chance that you will fall into a different personality category compared to the first time you<br />
took the test.<br />
A second criticism is that the MBTI mistakenly assumes that personality falls into<br />
mutually exclusive categories. ... <strong>The</strong> consequence is that the scores <strong>of</strong> two people<br />
labelled "introverted" and "extroverted" may be almost exactly the same, but they could<br />
be placed into different categories since they fall on either side <strong>of</strong> an imaginary dividing<br />
line<br />
Within each dichotomy scale, as measured on Form G, about 83% <strong>of</strong> categorizations<br />
remain the same when people are retested within nine months and around 75% when<br />
retested after nine months. About 50% <strong>of</strong> people re-administered the MBTI within nine<br />
months remain the same overall type and 36% the same type after more than nine<br />
months. For Form M (the most current form <strong>of</strong> the MBTI instrument), the<br />
MBTI Manual reports that these scores are higher (p. 163, Table 8.6).<br />
Page 74 <strong>of</strong> 160
In one study, when people were asked to compare their preferred type to that assigned<br />
by the MBTI assessment, only half <strong>of</strong> people chose the same pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
It has been argued that criticisms regarding the MBTI mostly come down to questions<br />
regarding the validity <strong>of</strong> its origins, not questions regarding the validity <strong>of</strong> the MBTI's<br />
usefulness. Others argue that the MBTI can be a reliable measurement <strong>of</strong> personality; it<br />
just so happens that "like all measures, the MBTI yields scores that are dependent on<br />
sample characteristics and testing conditions".<br />
Utility<br />
Isabel Myers claimed<br />
that the proportion <strong>of</strong> different<br />
personality types varied by choice <strong>of</strong><br />
career or course <strong>of</strong><br />
study. However,<br />
researchers examining the<br />
proportions <strong>of</strong> each type within<br />
varying<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />
report that the proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> MBTI types within each<br />
occupation is<br />
close to that<br />
within a random<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population. Some<br />
researchers<br />
have expressed reservations<br />
about the relevance <strong>of</strong> type to job<br />
satisfaction, as well as<br />
concerns about the<br />
potential misuse <strong>of</strong> the instrument in labeling<br />
people.<br />
CPP became the exclusive publisher <strong>of</strong> the MBTI in 1975. <strong>The</strong>y call it "the world's most<br />
widely used personality assessment", with as many as two million assessments<br />
administered annually. CPP and other proponents state that the indicator meets or<br />
exceeds the reliability <strong>of</strong> other psychological instruments and cite reports <strong>of</strong> individual<br />
behavior.<br />
Although meta-analysis claim support for validity and reliability, studies suggest that the<br />
MBTI "lacks convincing validity data" and that it is pseudoscience.<br />
<strong>The</strong> MBTI has poor predictive validity <strong>of</strong> employees' job performance ratings. As noted<br />
above under Precepts and ethics, the MBTI measures preferences, not ability. <strong>The</strong> use<br />
<strong>of</strong> the MBTI as a predictor <strong>of</strong> job success is expressly discouraged in the Manual. It is<br />
argued that the MBTI continues to be popular because many people lack psychometric<br />
sophistication, it is not difficult to understand, and there are many supporting books,<br />
websites and other sources which are readily available to the general public.<br />
Page 75 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 76 <strong>of</strong> 160
IV. <strong>Introversion</strong> vs. Extroversion<br />
<strong>The</strong> trait <strong>of</strong> Extraversion–<strong>Introversion</strong> is a central dimension <strong>of</strong> human<br />
personality theories. <strong>The</strong> terms introversion and extraversion were popularized by Carl<br />
Jung, although both the popular understanding and psychological usage differ from his<br />
original intent. Extraversion tends to be manifested in outgoing, talkative, energetic<br />
behavior, whereas introversion is manifested in more reserved and solitary<br />
behavior. Virtually all comprehensive models <strong>of</strong> personality include these concepts in<br />
various forms. Examples include the Big Five model, Jung's analytical psychology, Hans<br />
Eysenck's three-factor model, Raymond Cattell's 16 personality factors, the Minnesota<br />
Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator.<br />
Extraversion and introversion are typically viewed as a single continuum, so to be high<br />
in one necessitates being low in the other. Carl Jung and the developers <strong>of</strong> the Myers–<br />
Briggs Type Indicator provide a different perspective and suggest that everyone has<br />
both an extraverted side and an introverted side, with one being more dominant than<br />
the other.<br />
Rather than focusing on interpersonal behavior, however, Jung defined introversion as<br />
an "attitude-type characterized by orientation in life through subjective psychic contents"<br />
(focus on one's inner psychic activity) and extraversion as "an attitude type<br />
characterized by concentration <strong>of</strong> interest on the external object" (focus on the outside<br />
world).<br />
Page 77 <strong>of</strong> 160
Varieties<br />
Extraversion<br />
Extraversion (also spelled as extroversion) is the state <strong>of</strong> primarily obtaining gratification<br />
from outside oneself. Extraverts tend to enjoy human interactions and to<br />
be enthusiastic, talkative, assertive, and gregarious. Extraverts are energized and thrive<br />
<strong>of</strong>f being around other people.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y take pleasure in activities that involve large social gatherings, such as parties,<br />
community activities, public demonstrations, and business or political groups.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y also tend to work well in groups. An extraverted person is likely to enjoy time<br />
spent with people and find less reward in time spent alone. <strong>The</strong>y tend to be energized<br />
when around other people, and they are more prone to boredom when they are by<br />
themselves.<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong><br />
<strong>Introversion</strong> is the state <strong>of</strong> being predominantly interested in one's own mental<br />
self. Introverts are typically perceived as more reserved or reflective. Some popular<br />
psychologists have characterized introverts as people whose energy tends to expand<br />
through reflection and dwindle during interaction.<br />
This is similar to Jung's view, although he focused on mental energy rather than<br />
physical energy. Few modern conceptions make this distinction.<br />
Introverts <strong>of</strong>ten take pleasure in solitary activities such as reading, writing, using<br />
computers, hiking and fishing. <strong>The</strong> archetypal artist, writer, sculptor, scientist, engineer,<br />
composer and inventor are all highly introverted. An introvert is likely to enjoy time spent<br />
alone and find less reward in time spent with large groups <strong>of</strong> people, though they may<br />
enjoy interactions with close friends.<br />
Trust is usually an issue <strong>of</strong> significance: a virtue <strong>of</strong> utmost importance to introverts is<br />
choosing a worthy companion. <strong>The</strong>y prefer to concentrate on a single activity at a time<br />
and like to observe situations before they participate, especially observed in developing<br />
children and adolescents.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y are more analytical before speaking. Introverts are easily overwhelmed by too<br />
much stimulation from social gatherings and engagement, introversion having even<br />
been defined by some in terms <strong>of</strong> a preference for a quiet, more minimally stimulating<br />
external environment.<br />
Page 78 <strong>of</strong> 160
Mistaking introversion for shyness is a common error. <strong>Introversion</strong> is a preference, while<br />
shyness stems from distress. Introverts prefer solitary to social activities, but do not<br />
necessarily fear social encounters like shy people do. Susan Cain argues that modern<br />
Western culture misjudges the capabilities <strong>of</strong> introverted people, leading to a waste <strong>of</strong><br />
talent, energy and happiness. Cain describes how society is biased against introverts,<br />
and that, with people being taught from childhood that to be sociable is to be happy,<br />
introversion is now considered "somewhere between a disappointment and<br />
pathology". In contrast, Cain says that introversion is not a "second-class" trait but that<br />
both introverts and extraverts enrich society, with examples including the introverts J. K.<br />
Rowling, Avicii, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. Seuss, W. B.<br />
Yeats, Steven Spielberg and Larry Page.<br />
Ambiversion<br />
Although many people view being introverted or extraverted as mutually exclusive, most<br />
contemporary trait theories measure levels <strong>of</strong> extraversion-introversion as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />
single, continuous dimension <strong>of</strong> personality, with some scores near one end, and others<br />
near the half-way mark. Ambiversion is falling more or less directly in the middle. An<br />
Page 79 <strong>of</strong> 160
ambivert is moderately comfortable with groups and social interaction, but also relishes<br />
time alone, away from a crowd.<br />
Relative Prevalence<br />
Susan Cain's 2012 book Quiet: <strong>The</strong> Power <strong>of</strong> Introverts in a World That Can't Stop<br />
Talking reports that studies indicate 33–50% <strong>of</strong> the American population are<br />
introverts. Particular subpopulations have higher prevalence, with a 6000-subject MBTIbased<br />
survey indicating that 60% <strong>of</strong> attorneys, and 90% <strong>of</strong> intellectual<br />
property attorneys, are introverts.<br />
Measurement<br />
<strong>The</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> extraversion and introversion is most commonly assessed through selfreport<br />
measures, although peer-reports and third-party observation can also be used.<br />
Self-report measures are either lexical or based on statements. <strong>The</strong> type <strong>of</strong> measure<br />
is determined by an assessment <strong>of</strong> psychometric properties and the time and space<br />
constraints <strong>of</strong> the research being undertaken.<br />
Lexical Measures use individual adjectives that reflect extravert and introvert traits,<br />
such as outgoing, talkative, reserved and quiet. Words representing introversion are<br />
reverse coded to create composite measures <strong>of</strong> extraversion/introversion running on a<br />
continuum. Goldberg (1992) developed a 20-word measure as part <strong>of</strong> his 100-word Big<br />
Five markers. Saucier (1994) developed a briefer 8-word measure as part <strong>of</strong> his 40-<br />
word mini-markers. However, the psychometric properties <strong>of</strong> Saucier's original minimarkers<br />
have been found suboptimal with samples outside <strong>of</strong> North America. As a<br />
result, a systematically revised measure was developed to have superior psychometric<br />
properties, the International English Mini-Markers. <strong>The</strong> International English Mini-<br />
Markers has good internal consistency reliabilities and other validity for assessing<br />
extraversion/introversion and other five factor personality dimensions, both within and,<br />
especially, without American populations. Internal consistency reliability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Extraversion measure for native English-speakers is reported as .92, that for non-native<br />
English-speakers is .85.<br />
Statement Measures tend to comprise more words, and hence consume more<br />
research instrument space, than lexical measures. Respondents are asked the extent to<br />
which they, for example, Talk to a lot <strong>of</strong> different people at parties or Often feel<br />
uncomfortable around others. While some statement-based measures <strong>of</strong><br />
extraversion/introversion have similarly acceptable psychometric properties in North<br />
American populations to lexical measures, their generally emic development makes<br />
them less suited to use in other populations. For example, statements asking about<br />
talkativeness in parties are hard to answer meaningfully by those who do not attend<br />
parties, as Americans are assumed to do. Moreover, the sometimes colloquial North<br />
American language <strong>of</strong> statements makes them less suited to use outside America. For<br />
instance, statements like Keep in the background and Know how to captivate<br />
Page 80 <strong>of</strong> 160
people are sometimes hard for non-native English-speakers to understand except in a<br />
literal sense.<br />
Eysenck's <strong>The</strong>ory<br />
Hans Eysenck described extraversion-introversion as the degree to which a person is<br />
outgoing and interactive with other people. <strong>The</strong>se behavioral differences are presumed<br />
to be the result <strong>of</strong> underlying differences in brain physiology. Eysenck combined cortical<br />
inhibition and excitation with the ascending reticular activation system (ARAS), a<br />
pathway located in the brainstem. Extraverts seek excitement and social activity in an<br />
effort to heighten their arousal level, whereas introverts tend to avoid social situations in<br />
an effort to keep such arousal to a minimum. Eysenck designated extraversion as one<br />
<strong>of</strong> three major traits in his P-E-N model <strong>of</strong> personality, which also<br />
includes psychoticism and neuroticism.<br />
Eysenck originally suggested that extraversion was a combination <strong>of</strong> two major<br />
tendencies, impulsiveness and sociability. He later added several other more specific<br />
traits, namely liveliness, activity level, and excitability. <strong>The</strong>se traits are further linked in<br />
his personality hierarchy to even more specific habitual responses, such as partying on<br />
the weekend.<br />
Eysenck compared this trait to the four temperaments <strong>of</strong> ancient medicine, with choleric<br />
and sanguine temperaments equating to extraversion, and melancholic and phlegmatic<br />
temperaments equating to introversion.<br />
Page 81 <strong>of</strong> 160
Biological Factors<br />
<strong>The</strong> relative importance <strong>of</strong> nature versus environment in determining the level <strong>of</strong><br />
extraversion is controversial and the focus <strong>of</strong> many studies. Twin studies have found a<br />
genetic component <strong>of</strong> 39% to 58%. In terms <strong>of</strong> the environmental component, the<br />
shared family environment appears to be far less important than individual<br />
environmental factors that are not shared between siblings.<br />
Eysenck proposed that extraversion was caused by variability in cortical arousal. He<br />
hypothesized that introverts are characterized by higher levels <strong>of</strong> activity than extraverts<br />
and so are chronically more cortically aroused than extraverts. That extraverts require<br />
more external stimulation than introverts has been interpreted as evidence for this<br />
hypothesis. Other evidence <strong>of</strong> the "stimulation" hypothesis is that introverts salivate<br />
more than extraverts in response to a drop <strong>of</strong> lemon juice. This is due to increased<br />
activity in their reticular activating system, which responds to stimuli like food or social<br />
contact.<br />
Extraversion has been linked to higher sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the mesolimbic dopamine system to<br />
potentially rewarding stimuli. This in part explains the high levels <strong>of</strong> positive affect found<br />
in extraverts, since they will more intensely feel the excitement <strong>of</strong> a potential reward.<br />
One consequence <strong>of</strong> this is that extraverts can more easily learn the contingencies for<br />
positive reinforcement, since the reward itself is experienced as greater.<br />
One study found that introverts have more blood flow in the frontal lobes <strong>of</strong> their brain<br />
and the anterior or frontal thalamus, which are areas dealing with internal processing,<br />
such as planning and problem solving. Extraverts have more blood flow in the anterior<br />
cingulate gyrus, temporal lobes, and posterior thalamus, which are involved in sensory<br />
and emotional experience. This study and other research indicates that introversionextraversion<br />
is related to individual differences in brain function. A study on regional<br />
brain volume found a positive correlation between introversion and grey matter volume<br />
in the right prefrontal cortex and right temporoparietal junction, as well as a positive<br />
correlation between introversion and total white matter volume.<br />
Extraversion has also been linked to physiological factors such as respiration, through<br />
its association with surgency.<br />
Behavior<br />
Extraverts and introverts have a variety <strong>of</strong> behavioral differences. According to one<br />
study, extraverts tend to wear more decorative clothing, whereas introverts prefer<br />
practical, comfortable clothes. Extraverts are more likely to prefer more upbeat,<br />
conventional, and energetic music than introverts. Personality also influences how<br />
people arrange their work areas. In general, extraverts decorate their <strong>of</strong>fices more, keep<br />
their doors open, keep extra chairs nearby, and are more likely to put dishes <strong>of</strong> candy<br />
on their desks. <strong>The</strong>se are attempts to invite co-workers and encourage interaction.<br />
Page 82 <strong>of</strong> 160
Introverts, in contrast, decorate less and tend to arrange their workspace to discourage<br />
social interaction.<br />
Despite these differences, a meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> 15 experience sampling studies has<br />
suggested that there is a great deal <strong>of</strong> overlap in the way that extraverts and introverts<br />
behave. In these studies, participants used mobile devices to report how extraverted<br />
(e.g., bold, talkative, assertive, outgoing) they were acting at multiple times during their<br />
daily lives. Fleeson and Gallagher (2009) found that extraverts regularly behave in an<br />
introverted way, and introverts regularly behave in an extraverted way. Indeed, there<br />
was more within-person variability than between-person variability in extraverted<br />
behaviors. <strong>The</strong> key feature that distinguishes extraverts and introverts was that<br />
extraverts tend to act moderately extraverted about 5–10% more <strong>of</strong>ten than introverts.<br />
From this perspective, extraverts and introverts are not "fundamentally different".<br />
Rather, an "extravert" is just someone who acts more extraverted more <strong>of</strong>ten,<br />
suggesting that extraversion is more about<br />
what one "does" than<br />
what one "has".<br />
Additionally, a study by Lippa (1978) found<br />
evidence for the extent to which individuals<br />
present themselves in<br />
a different way. This is<br />
called expressive behavior, and it is<br />
dependent upon the<br />
individuals' motivation<br />
and ability to control that behavior.<br />
Lippa (1978) examined 68 students<br />
who were asked to role-play by<br />
pretending to teach a math class.<br />
<strong>The</strong> students' level <strong>of</strong> extraversion and<br />
introversion were rated based on their<br />
external/expressive<br />
behaviors such as stride<br />
length, graphic<br />
expansiveness,<br />
the<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> time they spent<br />
talking, the amount <strong>of</strong> time they spent making eye contact, and the total time <strong>of</strong> each<br />
teaching session. This study found that actual introverts were perceived and judged as<br />
having more extraverted-looking expressive behaviors because they were higher in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> their self-monitoring. This means that the introverts consciously put more effort<br />
into presenting a more extraverted, and rather socially desirable, version <strong>of</strong> themselves.<br />
Thus, individuals are able to regulate and modify behavior based on their environmental<br />
situations.<br />
Humans are complex and unique, and because introversion-extraversion varies along a<br />
continuum, individuals may have a mixture <strong>of</strong> both orientations. A person who acts<br />
introverted in one situation may act extraverted in another, and people can learn to act<br />
in "counter-dispositional" ways in certain situations. For example, Brian Little's free trait<br />
theory suggests that people can take on "Free Traits", behaving in ways that may not be<br />
Page 83 <strong>of</strong> 160
their "first nature", but can strategically advance projects that are important to them.<br />
Together, this presents an optimistic view <strong>of</strong> what extraversion is. Rather than being<br />
fixed and stable, individuals vary in their extraverted behaviors across different<br />
moments, and can choose to act extraverted to advance important personal projects or<br />
even increase their happiness, as mentioned above.<br />
Implications<br />
Acknowledging that introversion and extraversion are normal variants <strong>of</strong> behavior can<br />
help in self-acceptance and understanding <strong>of</strong> others. For example, an extravert can<br />
accept his/her introverted partner's need for space, while an introvert can acknowledge<br />
his/her extraverted partner's need for social interaction.<br />
Researchers have found a correlation between extraversion and self-reported<br />
happiness. That is, more extraverted people tend to report higher levels <strong>of</strong> happiness<br />
than introverts. Other research has shown that being instructed to act in an extraverted<br />
manner leads to increases in positive affect, even for people who are trait-level<br />
introverts.<br />
This does not mean that introverts are unhappy. Extraverts simply report experiencing<br />
more positive emotions, whereas introverts tend to be closer to neutral. This may be<br />
because extraversion is socially preferable in contemporary Western culture and thus<br />
introverts feel less desirable. In addition to the research on happiness, other studies<br />
have found that extraverts tend to report higher levels <strong>of</strong> self-esteem than<br />
introverts. Others suggest that such results reflect socio-cultural bias in the survey<br />
itself. Dr. David Meyers has claimed that happiness is a matter <strong>of</strong> possessing three<br />
traits: self-esteem, optimism, and extraversion. Meyers bases his conclusions on<br />
studies that report extraverts to be happier; these findings have been questioned in light<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fact that the "happiness" prompts given to the studies' subjects, such as "I like to<br />
be with others" and "I'm fun to be with," only measure happiness among<br />
extraverts. Also, according to Carl Jung, introverts acknowledge more readily their<br />
psychological needs and problems, whereas extraverts tend to be oblivious to them<br />
because they focus more on the outer world.<br />
Although extraversion is perceived as socially desirable in Western culture, it is not<br />
always an advantage. For example, extraverted youths are more likely to engage in<br />
antisocial or delinquent behavior. In line with this, emerging evidence suggest that the<br />
trait <strong>of</strong> extraversion may also be related to that <strong>of</strong> psychopathy. Conversely, while<br />
introversion is perceived as less socially desirable, it is strongly associated with positive<br />
traits such as intelligence and "giftedness." For many years, researchers have found<br />
that introverts tend to be more successful in academic environments, which extraverts<br />
may find boring.<br />
Research shows that behavioral immune system, the psychological processes that infer<br />
infection risk from perceptual cues and respond to these perceptual cues through the<br />
activation <strong>of</strong> aversive emotions, may influence gregariousness. Although extraversion is<br />
Page 84 <strong>of</strong> 160
associated with many positive outcomes like higher levels <strong>of</strong> happiness, those<br />
extraverted people are also likely to be exposed to interpersonally transmitted infectious<br />
disease as they tend to contact more people. When individuals are more vulnerable to<br />
infection, the cost <strong>of</strong> being social will be relatively greater. <strong>The</strong>refore, people are less<br />
extraversive when they feel vulnerable and vice versa.<br />
Although neither introversion nor extraversion is pathological, psychotherapists can take<br />
temperament into account when treating clients. Clients may respond better to different<br />
types <strong>of</strong> treatment depending on where they fall on the introversion-extraversion<br />
spectrum. Teachers can also consider temperament when dealing with their pupils, for<br />
example acknowledging that introverted children need more encouragement to speak in<br />
class while extraverted children may grow restless during long periods <strong>of</strong> quiet study.<br />
Regional Variation<br />
Some claim that Americans live in an "extraverted society" that rewards extravert<br />
behavior and rejects introversion. This is because the US is currently a culture <strong>of</strong><br />
external personality, whereas in some other cultures people are valued for their "inner<br />
selves and their moral rectitude". Other cultures, such as Japan and regions<br />
where Orthodox Christianity, Buddhism, Sufism etc. prevail, prize introversion. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
cultural differences predict individuals' happiness in that people who score higher in<br />
extraversion are happier, on average, in particularly extraverted cultures and vice versa.<br />
Researchers have found that people who live on islands tend to be less extraverted<br />
(more introverted) than those living on the mainland, and that people whose ancestors<br />
had inhabited the island for twenty generations tend to be less extraverted than more<br />
Page 85 <strong>of</strong> 160
ecent arrivals. Furthermore, people who emigrate from islands to the mainland tend to<br />
be more extraverted than people that stay on islands, and those that immigrate to<br />
islands.<br />
In the United States, researchers have found that people living in the midwestern states<br />
<strong>of</strong> North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois score<br />
higher than the U.S. average on extraversion. Utah and the southeastern states<br />
<strong>of</strong> Florida and Georgia also score high on this personality trait. <strong>The</strong> most introverted<br />
states in the United States are Maryland, New<br />
Hampshire, Alaska, Washington, Oregon and Vermont. People who live in the<br />
northwestern states <strong>of</strong> Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming are also relatively introverted. [56]<br />
Extraversion, <strong>Introversion</strong>, and Happiness<br />
As earlier stated, extraverts are <strong>of</strong>ten found to have higher levels <strong>of</strong> happiness<br />
and positive affect than introverts. An influential review article concluded that<br />
personality, specifically extraversion and emotional stability, was the best predictor <strong>of</strong><br />
subjective well-being. As examples, Argyle and Lu (1990) found that the trait <strong>of</strong><br />
extraversion, as measured by Extraversion Scale <strong>of</strong> the Eysenck Personality<br />
Questionnaire (EPQ), was positively and significantly correlated with happiness, as<br />
measured by the Oxford Happiness Inventory. Using the same happiness and<br />
extraversion scales, Hills and Argyle (2001) found that happiness was again<br />
significantly correlated with extraversion. Also, the study by Emmons<br />
and Diener (1986) showed that extraversion correlates positively and significantly<br />
with positive affect but not with negative affect. Similar results were found in a<br />
large longitudinal study by Diener, Sandvik, Pavot, and Fujita (1992), which assessed<br />
14,407 participants from 100 areas <strong>of</strong> continental United States. Using the abbreviated<br />
General Well-Being Schedule, which tapped positive and negative affects,<br />
and Costa and McCrae's (1986) short version <strong>of</strong> the NEO's Extraversion scale, the<br />
authors reported that extraverts experienced greater well-being at two points in time,<br />
during which data were collected: first between 1971 and 1975, and later between 1981<br />
and 1984. Furthermore, Larsen and Ketelaar (1991) showed that extraverts respond<br />
more to positive affect than to negative affect, since they exhibit more positive-affect<br />
reactivity to the positive-affect induction, yet they do not react more negatively to the<br />
negative-affect induction.<br />
Instrumental View<br />
<strong>The</strong> instrumental view proposes that personality traits give rise to conditions and<br />
actions, which have affective consequences, and thus generate individual differences in<br />
emotionality.<br />
Personality Trait As A Cause <strong>of</strong> Higher Sociability<br />
According to the instrumental view, one explanation for greater subjective wellbeing<br />
among extraverts could be that extraversion helps in the creation <strong>of</strong> life<br />
Page 86 <strong>of</strong> 160
circumstances, which promote high levels <strong>of</strong> positive affect. Specifically, the personality<br />
trait <strong>of</strong> extraversion is seen as a facilitator <strong>of</strong> more social interactions, since the low<br />
cortical arousal among extraverts results in them seeking more social situations in order<br />
to increase their arousal.<br />
Social Activity Hypothesis<br />
According to the social activity hypothesis, more frequent participation in social<br />
situations creates more frequent, and higher levels, <strong>of</strong> positive affect. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is<br />
believed that since extraverts are characterized as more sociable than introverts, they<br />
also possess higher levels <strong>of</strong> positive affect brought on by social<br />
interactions. Specifically, the results <strong>of</strong> Furnham and Brewin's study (1990) suggest that<br />
extraverts enjoy and participate more in social activities than introverts, and as a result<br />
extraverts report higher level <strong>of</strong> happiness. Also, in the study <strong>of</strong> Argyle and Lu<br />
(1990) extraverts were found to be less likely to avoid participation in noisy social<br />
activities, and to be more likely to participate in social activities such as: party games,<br />
jokes, or going to the cinema. Similar results were reported by Diener, Larsen, and<br />
Emmons (1984) who found that extraverts seek social situations more <strong>of</strong>ten than<br />
introverts, especially when engaging in recreational activities.<br />
However, a variety <strong>of</strong> findings contradict the claims <strong>of</strong> the social activity hypothesis.<br />
Firstly, it was found that extraverts were happier than introverts even when alone.<br />
Specifically, extraverts tend to be happier regardless <strong>of</strong> whether they live alone or with<br />
others, or whether they live in a vibrant city or quiet rural environment. Similarly, a study<br />
by Diener, Sandvik, Pavot, and Fujita (1992) showed that although extraverts chose<br />
social jobs relatively more frequently (51%) than nonsocial jobs compared to introverts<br />
(38%), they were happier than introverts regardless <strong>of</strong> whether their occupations had<br />
social or nonsocial character. Secondly, it was found that extraverts only sometimes<br />
reported greater amounts <strong>of</strong> social activity than introverts, but in general extraverts and<br />
introverts do not differ in the quantity <strong>of</strong> their socialization. Similar finding was reported<br />
by Srivastava, Angelo, and Vallereux (2008), who found that extraverts and introverts<br />
both enjoy participating in social interactions, but extraverts participate socially more.<br />
Thirdly, studies have shown that both extraverts and introverts participate in social<br />
Page 87 <strong>of</strong> 160
elations, but that the quality <strong>of</strong> this participation differs. <strong>The</strong> more frequent social<br />
participation among extraverts could be explained by the fact that extraverts know more<br />
people, but those people are not necessarily their close friends, whereas introverts,<br />
when participating in social interactions, are more selective and have only few close<br />
friends with whom they have special relationships.<br />
Social Attention <strong>The</strong>ory<br />
Yet another explanation <strong>of</strong> the high correlation between extraversion and happiness<br />
comes from the study by Ashton, Lee, and Paunonen (2002). <strong>The</strong>y suggested that the<br />
core element <strong>of</strong> extraversion is a tendency to behave in ways that attract, hold, and<br />
enjoy social attention, and not reward sensitivity. <strong>The</strong>y claimed that one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fundamental qualities <strong>of</strong> social attention is its potential <strong>of</strong> being rewarding. <strong>The</strong>refore, if<br />
a person shows positive emotions <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm, energy, and excitement, that person<br />
is seen favorably by others and he or she gains others' attention. This favorable reaction<br />
from others likely encourages extraverts to engage in further extraverted<br />
behavior. Ashton, Lee, and Paunonen's (2002) study showed that their measure <strong>of</strong><br />
social attention, the Social Attention Scale, was much more highly correlated with<br />
extraversion than were measures <strong>of</strong> reward sensitivity.<br />
Temperamental View<br />
Temperamental view is based on the notion that there is a direct link between<br />
people's personality traits and their sensitivity to positive and negative affects.<br />
Affective Reactivity Model<br />
<strong>The</strong> affective reactivity model states that the strength <strong>of</strong> a person's reactions to affectrelevant<br />
events are caused by people's differences in affect. This model is based on<br />
the reinforcement sensitivity theory by Jeffrey Alan Gray, which states that people with<br />
stronger behavioral activation system (BAS) are high in reward responsiveness and are<br />
predisposed to the personality trait <strong>of</strong> extraversion, while people with a stronger<br />
behavioral inhibition system (BIS) are lower in reward responsiveness and are more<br />
predisposed to personality trait <strong>of</strong> neuroticism and introversion. <strong>The</strong>refore, extraverts<br />
are seen as having a temperamental predisposition to positive affect since<br />
positive mood induction has a greater effect on them than on introverts, thus extraverts<br />
are more prone to react to pleasant effects. For example, Gable, Reis, and Elliot<br />
(2000). found in two consecutive studies that people with more sensitive BIS reported<br />
higher levels <strong>of</strong> average negative affect, while people with more sensitive BAS reported<br />
higher levels <strong>of</strong> positive affect. Also Zelenski and Larsen (1999) found that people with<br />
more sensitive BAS reported more positive emotions during the positive mood<br />
induction, while people with more sensitive BIS reported more negative emotions during<br />
the negative mood induction.<br />
Social Reactivity <strong>The</strong>ory<br />
Page 88 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> social reactivity theory alleges that all humans, whether they like it or not, are<br />
required to participate in social situations. Since extraverts prefer engaging in social<br />
interactions more than introverts, they also derive more positive affect from such<br />
situations than introverts do. <strong>The</strong> support for this theory comes from work <strong>of</strong> Brian R.<br />
Little, who popularized concept <strong>of</strong> "restorative niches". Little claimed that life <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
requires people to participate in social situations, and since acting social is out <strong>of</strong><br />
character for introverts, it was shown to harm their well-being. <strong>The</strong>refore, one way to<br />
preserve introverts' well-being is for them to recharge as <strong>of</strong>ten as possible in places<br />
where they can return to their true selves—places Little calls "restorative niches".<br />
However, it was also found that extraverts did not respond stronger to social situations<br />
than introverts, nor did they report bigger boosts <strong>of</strong> positive affect during such<br />
interactions.<br />
Affective Regulation<br />
Another possible explanation for<br />
more happiness among extraverts<br />
comes from the<br />
fact that extraverts<br />
are able to better<br />
regulate<br />
their affective<br />
states. This means<br />
that in ambiguous<br />
situations<br />
(situations where positive and<br />
negative moods are introduced and<br />
mixed in similar<br />
proportions)<br />
extraverts show a<br />
slower decrease <strong>of</strong><br />
positive affect, and, as a result,<br />
they maintained a more positive<br />
affect balance than<br />
introverts. Extraverts may also choose activities that facilitate happiness (e.g., recalling<br />
pleasant vs. unpleasant memories) more than introverts when anticipating difficult tasks.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Set-Point Model a.k.a. Affect-Level Model<br />
According to the set-point model, levels <strong>of</strong> positive and negative affects are more or less<br />
fixed within each individual, hence, after a positive or negative event, people's moods<br />
tend to go back to the pre-set level. According to the set-point model, extraverts<br />
experience more happiness because their pre-set level <strong>of</strong> positive affect is set higher<br />
than the pre-set point <strong>of</strong> positive affect in introverts, therefore extraverts require less<br />
positive reinforcement in order to feel happy.<br />
Page 89 <strong>of</strong> 160
Pleasure-Arousal Relation<br />
A study by Peter Kuppens (2008) showed that extraverts and introverts engage in<br />
different behaviors when feeling pleasant, which may explain underestimation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
frequency and intensity <strong>of</strong> happiness exhibited by introverts. Specifically, Kuppens<br />
(2008) found that arousal and pleasantness are positively correlated for extraverts,<br />
which means that pleasant feelings are more likely to be accompanied by high arousal<br />
for extraverts. On the other hand, arousal and pleasantness are<br />
negatively correlated for introverts, resulting in introverts exhibiting low arousal when<br />
feeling pleasant. In other words, if everything is going well in an extravert's life, which is<br />
a source <strong>of</strong> pleasant feelings, extraverts see such situation as an opportunity to engage<br />
in active behavior and goal pursuit, which brings about an active, aroused pleasant<br />
state. When everything is going well for introverts, they see it as an opportunity to let<br />
down their guard, resulting in them feeling relaxed and content.<br />
Complications to <strong>The</strong> Extraversion-Happiness Correlation<br />
Though extraversion has consistently been shown to have a strong correlation with<br />
happiness and well-being, these findings are complicated by the presence <strong>of</strong> other<br />
personality traits that act as strong indicators <strong>of</strong> happiness.<br />
Neuroticism and Extraversion<br />
In multiple studies, neuroticism has been shown to have an equal, if not larger, impact<br />
on happiness and subjective well-being than extraversion. One study classified school<br />
children into four categories based on their scores in assessments <strong>of</strong> extraversion and<br />
emotional stability (neuroticism). <strong>The</strong> results showed no significant difference between<br />
the happiness levels <strong>of</strong> stable introverts and stable extraverts, while unstable extraverts<br />
and introverts both demonstrated significantly less happiness than their counterparts. In<br />
this study, neuroticism appeared to be the more salient factor for overall well-being.<br />
Likewise, in later studies, researchers used assessment scales to test for categories<br />
such as self-esteem and life-goal orientation, which they had positively correlated with<br />
happiness. Participants’ responses to these scales suggested that neuroticism actually<br />
had a larger impact than extraversion in measures <strong>of</strong> well-being.<br />
Other Big 5 Factors and Extraversion<br />
Though extraversion and neuroticism seem to have the largest effect on personal<br />
happiness, other Big 5 personality factors have also been shown to correlate with<br />
happiness and subjective well-being. For example, one study showed that<br />
conscientiousness and agreeableness correlated about 0.20 with subjective wellbeing.<br />
While the effect <strong>of</strong> these traits was not as strong as extraversion or neuroticism, it<br />
is clear that they still have some impact on happiness outcomes.<br />
Page 90 <strong>of</strong> 160
Similarly, interactions between extraversion, neuroticism, and conscientiousness have<br />
demonstrated significant impacts on subjective-well being. In one study, researchers<br />
used three scale to assess subjective well-being. <strong>The</strong>y found that extraversion only<br />
served as a predictor for one assessment, in conjunction with neuroticism, while the<br />
other two assessment outcomes were better predicted by conscientiousness and<br />
neuroticism. In addition to the importance <strong>of</strong> including other factors in happiness<br />
assessments, this study also demonstrates the manner in which an operational<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> well-being changes whether extraversion emerges as a salient predictive<br />
factor.<br />
Other Contributing Personality Factors<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is also evidence that other non-trait elements <strong>of</strong> personality may correlate with<br />
happiness. For instance, one study demonstrated that various features <strong>of</strong> one's goals,<br />
such as progress towards important goals or conflicts between them, can affect both<br />
emotional and cognitive well-being. Several other researchers have also suggested<br />
that, at least in more individualistic cultures, having a coherent sense <strong>of</strong> one's<br />
personality (and acting in a way that conforms to that self-concept) is positively related<br />
to well-being. Thus, focusing solely on extraversion—or even extraversion and<br />
Page 91 <strong>of</strong> 160
neuroticism—is likely to provide an incomplete picture <strong>of</strong> the relationship between<br />
happiness and personality.<br />
Culture<br />
In addition, one’s culture may also influence happiness and overall subjective wellbeing.<br />
<strong>The</strong> overall level <strong>of</strong> happiness fluctuates from culture to culture, as does<br />
preferred expression <strong>of</strong> happiness. Comparing various international surveys across<br />
countries reveals that different nations, and different ethnic groups within nations,<br />
exhibit differences in average life satisfaction.<br />
For example, one researcher found that between 1958 and 1987, Japanese life<br />
satisfaction fluctuated around 6 on a 10-point scale, while Denmark’s fluctuated around<br />
8. Comparing ethnic groups within the United States, another study found that<br />
European Americans reported being “significantly happier” with their lives than Asian<br />
Americans.<br />
Researchers have hypothesized a number <strong>of</strong> factors that could be responsible for these<br />
differences between countries, including national differences in overall income levels,<br />
self-serving biases and self-enhancement, and approach and avoidance<br />
orientations. Taken together, these findings suggest that while extraversion-introversion<br />
does have a strong correlation with happiness, it does not stand alone as a sole<br />
predictor <strong>of</strong> subjective well-being, and that other factors must be accounted for when<br />
trying to determine the correlates <strong>of</strong> happiness.<br />
Page 92 <strong>of</strong> 160
V. Social Anxiety<br />
and <strong>The</strong> Difference Between <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
and Social Anxiety<br />
Social Anxiety can be defined as nervousness in social situations. Some<br />
disorders associated with the social anxiety spectrum include anxiety disorders, mood<br />
disorders, autism, eating disorders, and substance use disorders. Individuals higher in<br />
social anxiety avert their gazes, show fewer facial expressions, and show difficulty with<br />
initiating and maintaining conversation. Trait social anxiety, the stable tendency to<br />
experience this nervousness, can be distinguished from state anxiety, the momentary<br />
response to a particular social stimulus. Nearly 90% <strong>of</strong> individuals report feeling a form<br />
<strong>of</strong> social anxiety (e.g. shyness) at some point in their lives. Half <strong>of</strong> the individuals with<br />
any social fears meet criteria for social anxiety disorder. <strong>The</strong> function <strong>of</strong> social anxiety is<br />
to increase arousal and attention to social interactions, inhibit unwanted social behavior,<br />
and motivate preparation for social situations such as performance situations.<br />
Child Development<br />
Stages<br />
Some feelings <strong>of</strong> anxiety in social situations is normal and necessary for effective social<br />
functioning and developmental growth. Cognitive advances and increased pressures in<br />
Page 93 <strong>of</strong> 160
late childhood and early adolescence result in repeated social anxiety. Adolescents<br />
have identified their most common anxieties as focused on relationships with peers to<br />
whom they are attracted, peer rejection, public speaking, blushing, selfconsciousness,<br />
freaking out, and past behavior. Most adolescents progress through<br />
their fears and meet the developmental demands placed on them. More and more<br />
children are being diagnosed with social anxiety, and this can lead to problems with<br />
education if not closely monitored. Part <strong>of</strong> social anxiety is fear <strong>of</strong> being criticized by<br />
others, and in children, social anxiety causes extreme distress over everyday activities<br />
such as playing with other kids, reading in class, or speaking to adults. On the other<br />
hand, some children with social anxiety will act out because <strong>of</strong> their fear. <strong>The</strong> problem<br />
with identifying social anxiety disorder in children is that it can be difficult to determine<br />
the difference between social anxiety and basic shyness.<br />
Adults<br />
It can be easier to identify social anxiety within adults because they tend to shy away<br />
from any social situation and keep to themselves. Common adult forms <strong>of</strong> social anxiety<br />
include performance anxiety, public speaking anxiety, stage fright, and timidness. All <strong>of</strong><br />
these may also assume clinical forms, i.e., become anxiety disorders (see below).<br />
Criteria that distinguish between clinical and nonclinical forms <strong>of</strong> social anxiety include<br />
the intensity and level <strong>of</strong> behavioral and psychosomatic disruption (discomfort) in<br />
addition to the anticipatory nature <strong>of</strong> the fear. Social anxieties may also be classified<br />
according to the broadness <strong>of</strong> triggering social situations. For example, fear <strong>of</strong> eating in<br />
public has a very narrow situational scope (eating in public), while shyness may have a<br />
wide scope (a person may be shy <strong>of</strong> doing many things in various circumstances). <strong>The</strong><br />
clinical (disorder) forms are also divided into general social phobia (i.e., social anxiety<br />
disorder) and specific social phobia.<br />
Disorder<br />
Social anxiety disorder (SAD), also known as social phobia, is an anxiety<br />
disorder characterized by a significant amount <strong>of</strong> fear in one or more social situations<br />
causing considerable distress and impaired ability to function in at least some parts <strong>of</strong><br />
daily life. <strong>The</strong>se fears can be triggered by perceived or actual scrutiny from others.<br />
Physical symptoms <strong>of</strong>ten include excessive blushing, excess<br />
sweating, trembling, palpitations, and nausea. Stammering may be present, along with<br />
rapid speech. Panic attacks can also occur under intense fear and discomfort. Some<br />
sufferers may use alcohol or other drugs to reduce fears and inhibitions at social events.<br />
It is common for sufferers <strong>of</strong> social phobia to self-medicate in this fashion, especially if<br />
they are undiagnosed, untreated, or both; this can lead to alcoholism, eating<br />
disorders or other kinds <strong>of</strong> substance abuse. SAD is sometimes referred to as an<br />
"illness <strong>of</strong> lost opportunities" where "individuals make major life choices to<br />
accommodate their illness". According to ICD-10 guidelines, the main diagnostic criteria<br />
<strong>of</strong> social anxiety disorder are fear <strong>of</strong> being the focus <strong>of</strong> attention, or fear <strong>of</strong> behaving in a<br />
Page 94 <strong>of</strong> 160
way that will be embarrassing or humiliating, avoidance and anxiety<br />
symptoms. Standardized rating scales can be used to screen for social anxiety disorder<br />
and measure the severity <strong>of</strong> anxiety.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first line treatment for social anxiety disorder is cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)<br />
with medications recommended only in those who are not interested in therapy. CBT is<br />
effective in treating social phobia, whether delivered individually or in a group<br />
setting. <strong>The</strong> cognitive and behavioral components seek to change thought patterns and<br />
physical reactions to anxiety-inducing situations. <strong>The</strong> attention given to social anxiety<br />
disorder has significantly increased since 1999 with the approval and marketing <strong>of</strong><br />
drugs for its treatment. Prescribed medications include several classes<br />
<strong>of</strong> antidepressants: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotoninnorepinephrine<br />
reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and monoamine oxidase<br />
inhibitors (MAOIs). Other commonly used medications include beta<br />
blockers and benzodiazepines. It is the most common anxiety disorder with up to 10%<br />
<strong>of</strong> people being affected at some point in their life.<br />
Signs and Symptoms<br />
Blushing is a physiological response unique to humans and is a hallmark physiological<br />
response associated with social anxiety. Blushing is the involuntary reddening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
face, neck, and chest in reaction to evaluation or social attention. Blushing occurs not<br />
only in response to feelings <strong>of</strong> embarrassment but also other socially-oriented emotions<br />
such as shame, guilt, shyness, and pride. Individuals high in social anxiety perceive<br />
themselves as blushing more than those who are low in social anxiety. Three types <strong>of</strong><br />
blushing can be measured: self-perceived blushing (how much the individual believes<br />
he or she is blushing), physiological blushing (blushing as measured by physiological<br />
indices), and observed blushing (blushing observed by others). Social anxiety is<br />
strongly associated with self-perceived blushing, weakly associated with blushing as<br />
measured by physiological indices such as temperature and blood flow to the cheeks<br />
and forehead, and moderately associated with observed blushing. <strong>The</strong> relationship<br />
between physiological blushing and self-perceived blushing is small among those high<br />
in social anxiety, indicating that individuals with high social anxiety may overestimate<br />
Page 95 <strong>of</strong> 160
their blushing. That social anxiety is associated most strongly with self-perceived<br />
blushing is also important for cognitive models <strong>of</strong> blushing and social anxiety, indicating<br />
that socially anxious individuals use both internal cues and other types <strong>of</strong> information to<br />
draw conclusions about how they are coming across.<br />
Attention Bias<br />
Individuals who tend to experience more social anxiety turn their attention away from<br />
threatening social information and toward themselves, prohibiting them from challenging<br />
negative expectations about others and maintaining high levels <strong>of</strong> social anxiety. A<br />
socially anxious individual perceives rejection from a conversational partner, turns his or<br />
her attention away, and never learns that the individual is actually<br />
welcoming. Individuals who are high in social anxiety tend to show increased initial<br />
attention toward negative social cues such as threatening faces followed by attention<br />
away from these social cues, indicating a pattern <strong>of</strong> hypervigilance followed by<br />
avoidance. Attention in social anxiety has been measured using the dot-probe<br />
paradigm, which presents two faces next to one another. One face has an emotional<br />
expression and the other has a neutral expression, and when the faces disappear, a<br />
probe appears in the location <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the faces. This creates a congruent condition in<br />
which the probe appears in the same location as the emotional face, and an<br />
incongruent condition. Participants respond to the probe by pressing a button and<br />
differences in reaction times reveal attentional biases. This task has revealed mixed<br />
results, with some studies finding no differences between socially anxious individuals<br />
and controls, some studies finding avoidance <strong>of</strong> all faces, and others finding vigilance<br />
toward threat faces. <strong>The</strong>re is some evidence that vigilance toward threat faces can be<br />
detected during short but not longer exposures to faces, indicating a possible initial<br />
hypervigilance followed by avoidance. <strong>The</strong> Face-in-the-crowd task shows that<br />
individuals with social anxiety are faster at detecting an angry face in a predominantly<br />
neutral or positive crowd or slower at detecting happy faces than a nonanxious<br />
person. Results overall using this task are mixed and this task may not be able to detect<br />
hypervigilance toward angry faces in social anxiety.<br />
Focus on the self has been associated with increased social anxiety and negative<br />
affect, however there are two types <strong>of</strong> self-focus: In public self focus, one shows<br />
concern for the impact <strong>of</strong> one's own actions on others and their impressions. This type<br />
<strong>of</strong> self-focus predicts greater social anxiety. Other more private forms <strong>of</strong> selfconsciousness<br />
(e.g., egocentric goals) are associated with other types <strong>of</strong> negative<br />
affect.<br />
Basic science research suggests that cognitive biases can be modified. Attention bias<br />
modification training has been shown to temporarily impact social anxiety.<br />
Measures<br />
Trait social anxiety is most commonly measured by self-report. This method possesses<br />
limitations, however subjective responses are the most reliable indicator <strong>of</strong> a subjective<br />
Page 96 <strong>of</strong> 160
state. Other measures <strong>of</strong> social anxiety include diagnostic interviews, clinicianadministered<br />
instruments, and behavioral assessments. No single trait social anxiety<br />
self-report measure shows all psychometric properties including different kinds<br />
<strong>of</strong> validity (content validity, criterion validity, construct validity), reliability and internal<br />
consistency. <strong>The</strong> SIAS along with the SIAS-6A and -6B are rated as the best. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
measures include:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fear <strong>of</strong> Negative Evaluation (FNE) and Brief form (BFNE)<br />
Fear Questionnaire Social Phobic Subscale (FQSP)<br />
Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS)<br />
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self Report (LSAS-SR)<br />
Older Adult Social-Evaluative Situations (OASES)<br />
Social Avoidance and Distress (SAD)<br />
Self-Consciousness Scale (SCC)<br />
Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and brief form (SIAS-6A and -6B)<br />
Social Interaction Phobia Scale (SIPS)<br />
Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI) and brief form (SPAI-23)<br />
Situational Social Avoidance (SSA)<br />
________<br />
Page 97 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> Difference Between Social Anxiety and <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
In 4 Comics<br />
Loving Alone Time Is Different from A Mental Health Condition.<br />
by Lindsay Holmes and Eva Hill<br />
Huffington Post April 25, 2018<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong> and social anxiety are <strong>of</strong>ten conflated, whether it’s in people’s minds or in<br />
memes on the internet. Here’s the reality: Preferring alone time is not the same as living<br />
with a mental health condition.<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong> (the characteristic <strong>of</strong> preferring alone time) is a personality trait. Social<br />
anxiety (a phobia <strong>of</strong> being watched or judged by others) is a mental health condition,<br />
and it affects an estimated 15 million Americans. Of course, you can be an introvert and<br />
also have social anxiety. But the misperception that the two are one and the same does<br />
a disservice to those who fall under each category.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se easy-to-understand illustrations depict the differences between social anxiety<br />
and introversion, according to experts and research.<br />
Take a look:<br />
1. Introverts Get Drained from Big Parties. People Living with Social Anxiety<br />
Often Fear <strong>The</strong>m.<br />
<strong>The</strong> thought <strong>of</strong> social interaction can be paralyzing for someone living with a<br />
social anxiety disorder, according to Victor Schwartz, the chief medical <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong><br />
the Jed Foundation, a suicide prevention organization.<br />
“<strong>Introversion</strong> is a character style. <strong>The</strong> person may not like or may take time to<br />
warm up in social settings and might experience some manageable anxiety in<br />
social settings,” he said. “<strong>The</strong> person with social anxiety has more severe and<br />
acute anxiety when faced with or even thinking about social situations, and this<br />
will very likely cause functional limits.” This includes a fear or an avoidance <strong>of</strong><br />
parties or other group settings, he added.<br />
2. An Introvert Could Be Born with <strong>The</strong> Trait. Social Anxiety Can Develop Based<br />
On a Person’s Environment.<br />
Social anxiety can manifest as a product <strong>of</strong> a person’s environment, according to<br />
clinical psychologist Ellen Hendriksen. For example, it can develop after bullying<br />
or some early form <strong>of</strong> social rejection. However, introversion is more <strong>of</strong> a<br />
characteristic that’s ingrained in a person from the start.<br />
Page 98 <strong>of</strong> 160
“<strong>Introversion</strong> is a trait, meaning it’s part <strong>of</strong> your inborn personality,” she wrote in a<br />
post republished on Scientific American. “But with social anxiety, while you may<br />
carry a predisposition toward it, you didn’t come out <strong>of</strong> the womb with it. Likely, a<br />
lot <strong>of</strong> learning went into its development.”<br />
3. An Introvert May Enjoy Downtime Before Going Somewhere with A Crowd.<br />
Someone Living with Social Anxiety May Have A Panic Attack.<br />
Introverts use their downtime before or after social engagements as a moment to<br />
recharge, as they gain or replenish their energy from being alone rather than<br />
from being around others. For those with social anxiety, anticipating a large<br />
gathering might cause extreme fear, panic or stress.<br />
“Symptoms <strong>of</strong> social anxiety are the same as symptoms <strong>of</strong> anxiety in general.<br />
What differs is the setting or context,” Schwartz explained. Those can include<br />
“feelings <strong>of</strong> tension, jitteriness, difficulty sitting still or concentrating and physical<br />
symptoms like tightness in throat or chest, heart beating fast, sweaty palms and<br />
fluttery stomach.”<br />
Page 99 <strong>of</strong> 160
4. Introverts Don’t Necessarily Dislike Public Speaking; <strong>The</strong>y Just Hate the Small<br />
Talk That Follows. People Living with Social Anxiety Worry <strong>The</strong>y’re Being Judged<br />
By A Crowd.<br />
When it comes to public speaking or presentations, introverts loathe the<br />
meaningless talk after the event but may not hate the address itself. For those<br />
living with social anxiety, standing in front <strong>of</strong> a group is the problem.<br />
Perfectionism is a side effect <strong>of</strong> the condition, and those dealing with it are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
afraid they’ll mess up or say the wrong thing.<br />
“<strong>The</strong>re are <strong>of</strong>ten thoughts about people disapproving or likely making fun <strong>of</strong> the<br />
person with anxiety,” Schwartz said. “People <strong>of</strong>ten expect they will be<br />
embarrassed or ashamed by something they will say or do — ‘My voice sounds<br />
funny’ or ‘I feel inarticulate’ or something like that.”<br />
Bottom line: Inaccurate stereotypes can lead to wrongful stigma ― no matter if a person<br />
identifies as an introvert, someone with social anxiety or both.<br />
Page 100 <strong>of</strong> 160
VI. How to Thrive<br />
as an Introvert<br />
by IntrovertDear.com<br />
Introverts can be successful in any walk <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are introverts who are famous actors and politicians. <strong>The</strong>re are introvert CEOs,<br />
pop stars, authors, and engineers. And introverts, like everyone, can find happiness in<br />
love, in family, in spirituality or in learning — or in whatever gives them purpose.<br />
What’s different about introverts is what we have to do to tap into our talents and thrive:<br />
We have to work with our introversion rather than fight against it.<br />
That might mean turning down social invites. It might mean focusing on the friends you<br />
value most instead <strong>of</strong> trying to be everything to everyone. It might mean finding a way to<br />
get more solitude at work — especially in an open <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
And, most important, it might mean trusting your instinct about what you really need to<br />
be happy. Once you do that, you will stop feeling worn out or uncertain — and you’ll<br />
start seeing your genius come through.<br />
________<br />
Page 101 <strong>of</strong> 160
What Is an Introvert? Definition & Guide to <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
Introvert Definition:<br />
<strong>The</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> an introvert is someone who prefers calm, minimally stimulating<br />
environments. Introverts tend to feel drained after socializing and regain their energy by<br />
spending time alone. This is largely because introverts’ brains respond to dopamine<br />
differently than extroverts’ brains. In other words, if you’re an introvert, you were likely<br />
born that way.<br />
How Do I Know if I’m an Introvert?<br />
<br />
<br />
Have you always felt different?<br />
Do you enjoy spending time alone?<br />
Do you ever feel like you’re the only person who doesn’t need to talk, talk, talk —<br />
or be around people all the time?<br />
If so, you might be an introvert.<br />
Being an introvert is perfectly normal. Despite what your peers, teachers, and even<br />
parents may have told you, being an introvert doesn’t mean there’s something wrong<br />
with you—and it’s not even that uncommon. Studies suggest that 30 to 50 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
the U.S. population are introverts. That’s one out <strong>of</strong> every two or three people you<br />
know.<br />
<strong>The</strong> result? Even if you’re not an introvert yourself, you likely work with, are married to,<br />
or are friends with an introvert. Most people know more introverts than they think.<br />
Right now, there’s an introvert revolution going on. Slowly, our extroverted world is<br />
learning to understand and accept the introvert’s way. But in order to do that, we first<br />
need to better understand what introversion is — and what it’s not…<br />
What Does It Mean to Be an Introvert?<br />
<strong>The</strong> most common definition <strong>of</strong> an introvert is someone who gets drained by socializing<br />
and recharges by being alone. But there’s so much more to introversion than that.<br />
Everyone is born with an innate temperament — a way that you gain energy and prefer<br />
to interact with the world. <strong>Introversion</strong> and extroversion are temperaments. Whether<br />
you’re an introvert or extrovert is largely determined by your genes — meaning you<br />
were probably born that way.<br />
However, we’re also shaped by our life experiences. If your quiet, thoughtful ways were<br />
encouraged by your parents, teachers, and others, you probably grew up feeling<br />
confident in who you are. But, like many introverts, if you were teased, bullied, or told to<br />
Page 102 <strong>of</strong> 160
“come out <strong>of</strong> your shell,” you may have developed social anxiety or felt like you had to<br />
pretend to be someone you’re not.<br />
<strong>The</strong> good news is it’s not too late to work on the things that hold you back.<br />
Of course, not all introverts are the same. Some introverts will need only a little bit <strong>of</strong><br />
alone time to recharge and can handle a fair amount <strong>of</strong> social time before feeling<br />
drained. Others drain quickly and prefer to spend very long periods alone. It’s different<br />
for each person, and many introverts are somewhere in the middle.<br />
Sooner or later, however, all introverts will<br />
experience the dreaded “introvert<br />
hangover,” which is the feeling <strong>of</strong> being<br />
completely wiped out from too much<br />
“people time” or stimulation. This can mean<br />
feeling fatigued, unable to concentrate, or<br />
even grouchy. It’s as if your brain has used<br />
up all its mental energy and just doesn’t<br />
haven’t any left. (And, in fact, that’s exactly<br />
what has happened.)<br />
<strong>The</strong> result is that most introverts share<br />
certain characteristics:<br />
<br />
<br />
We’d rather stay home most nights<br />
than go out to one social event after<br />
another.<br />
We enjoy quiet, solitary activities like<br />
reading, writing, gaming, gardening,<br />
or drawing.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
We’ll usually choose the company <strong>of</strong> a few close friends over a wild party.<br />
We do our best work alone.<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> us will avoid small talk or other unnecessary social interactions.<br />
Are Introverts Shy?<br />
Some introverts are and some aren’t. This is probably the single most misunderstood<br />
thing about being an introvert.<br />
<strong>The</strong> truth is that being shy and being an introvert are two totally different traits:<br />
Page 103 <strong>of</strong> 160
Being shy means you get very nervous and self-conscious in social situations.<br />
Both introverts and extroverts can have this trait — not all natural-born extroverts<br />
run around chatting with strangers!<br />
Being introverted means socializing wears you out. You might not be nervous<br />
or shy at all. In fact, many introverts enjoy socializing (as long as it’s<br />
meaningful!). And some even get misidentified as ambiverts or extroverts. But<br />
since it will eventually tire you out, you probably avoid extra social time when you<br />
can.<br />
Compare social stamina to running. If extroverts are marathon runners, introverts are<br />
sprinters. That doesn’t mean that introverts don’t like running (er, social time). It just<br />
means we have to conserve our energy.<br />
5 Myths About Introverts<br />
Unfortunately, many people don’t fully understand what it means to be an introvert.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y equate introversion with shyness, depression, or social anxiety. When introverts<br />
go quiet, we are wrongly accused <strong>of</strong> being stuck up, angry, or disinterested. And when<br />
we spend time alone, we are <strong>of</strong>ten accused <strong>of</strong> being antisocial or selfish.<br />
For most introverts, these misconceptions couldn’t be further from the truth. Here’s the<br />
truth behind the five worst stereotypes:<br />
1. Introverts are not necessarily socially awkward. Just like shyness, social<br />
awkwardness is a separate trait from introversion. Many introverts can actually<br />
be quite charismatic in social situations. (In fact, introverts account for 60 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> all lawyers, a pr<strong>of</strong>ession that requires quite a bit <strong>of</strong> confidence speaking in<br />
front <strong>of</strong> others.)<br />
2. Introverts don’t hate people. An introvert’s lack <strong>of</strong> chitchat is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
misinterpreted. People take it as a sign that we don’t like others. <strong>The</strong> truth is the<br />
opposite. Introverts <strong>of</strong>ten avoid small talk because we consider it to be<br />
inauthentic. We crave a more meaningful connection with the people we talk to.<br />
3. Introverts aren’t rude. Yes, if an introvert is completely out <strong>of</strong> social energy, we<br />
might start getting a little crabby or simply zone out. But we’re not trying to be<br />
rude — and we’ll be a lot more friendly if you give us some time to recharge<br />
alone.<br />
4. Introverts don’t need be “fixed.” Being an introvert is part <strong>of</strong> who we are, and it<br />
can be a source <strong>of</strong> brilliance. We are at our best when we embrace our nature<br />
and use it as a source <strong>of</strong> strength.<br />
5. Introverts don’t (usually) wish we were extroverted. Sure, sometimes<br />
introverts envy an extrovert’s ability to think quickly or fit naturally into a social<br />
Page 104 <strong>of</strong> 160
situation. But we also take great delight in our inner world and our alone time.<br />
Introverts have many strengths that don’t come naturally to extroverts, and we<br />
wouldn’t trade them for the world.<br />
13 Signs You Are an Introvert<br />
Every introvert is unique, but there are some signs you’re an introvert that are pretty<br />
telling. Here are 13 signs that you might be an introvert:<br />
1. You enjoy spending time alone<br />
Most introverts enjoy social time too, but all introverts enjoy the solitude <strong>of</strong><br />
spending time alone. If alone time feels refreshing, peaceful, and helps you<br />
recharge, you’re probably an introvert.<br />
2. Certain types <strong>of</strong> socializing drain you<br />
It’s possible that not all social settings affect you the same way. But with new<br />
people, large crowds, or in noisy environments, you probably get wiped out fast.<br />
Stay out too long and you may even crash — a.k.a. the “introvert hangover.”<br />
3. You do your best work alone<br />
Page 105 <strong>of</strong> 160
Introverts rarely work well in crowded environments. <strong>The</strong> more secluded you are,<br />
the more likely you are to focus deeply and produce great work. You may feel<br />
more creative, focused, or productive, or you may simply be able to do more in a<br />
shorter time. It doesn’t mean you can’t work on teams, but you like to retreat<br />
somewhere quiet once the collaborating is done. In an open <strong>of</strong>fice, noisecanceling<br />
headphones are your friend.<br />
4. You’d rather hang out with a few close friends than a large group <strong>of</strong> people<br />
It’s a myth that introverts don’t like to socialize. Sitting with a few close friends,<br />
you may enjoy chatting all night, and you may even “seem” like an extrovert. For<br />
whatever reason, these types <strong>of</strong> interactions don’t drain you the way others do.<br />
But once you get to a party or large group setting, you know it’s only a matter <strong>of</strong><br />
time before you feel wiped.<br />
5. You have a vivid, rich inner world…<br />
You might spend a lot <strong>of</strong> time pondering, and even dreaming. Or, you might just<br />
prefer to think things through before you act. Not every introvert is a dreamer or<br />
creative, but almost all have an entire inner world that they find just as<br />
comfortable as the world around them<br />
6. …and you’re <strong>of</strong>ten “in your head”<br />
Sometimes, you get caught daydreaming, or you get flak from coworkers who are<br />
quicker to act with less planning. You might even have been told to “get your<br />
head out <strong>of</strong> the clouds” — or you may simply tend to zone out during a<br />
conversation and pursue your own thoughts. It’s not that the word around you<br />
isn’t interesting. It’s just that what you’re imagining or thinking about is<br />
even more interesting.<br />
7. You prefer to stay out <strong>of</strong> the spotlight<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are exceptions to this, but many introverts prefer not to speak up in large<br />
group settings — and would rather hand <strong>of</strong>f speaking roles to someone else. Of<br />
course, many introverts are creatives and performers, and some even love<br />
getting on stage. Others are business leaders who speak in front <strong>of</strong> teams or<br />
audiences all the time. Introverts are fully capable <strong>of</strong> learning and mastering<br />
these skills, but if your natural inclination is to avoid group participation, you may<br />
be an introvert.<br />
8. You can “network,” but you feel like you’re faking it<br />
If you hate small talk, and you also hate having to talk to strangers, then<br />
networking is just about the least comfortable thing you can do — and that’s<br />
Page 106 <strong>of</strong> 160
exactly how most introverts feel. That doesn’t mean you can’t do it when it’s<br />
necessary for work or business, but if given a choice, you’d schedule your next<br />
networking event for sometime in 2089.<br />
9. You don’t always know what to say<br />
Instead, you routinely find yourself thinking <strong>of</strong> the right response after the<br />
conversation is over. This is normal: many introverts struggle with word retrieval<br />
(the ability to choose the right words on the fly).<br />
10. You’re better at writing your thoughts than speaking them<br />
You may or may not be a natural novelist, but if writing something is more<br />
comfortable than saying it in person, it’s a strong sign you’re an introvert.<br />
Introverts take time to think about what we want to say, and while that can slow<br />
down a live conversation, it makes for very clear and expressive writing.<br />
11. You dive deep, both in your relationships and interests<br />
What exactly do you do with that alone time you like to have? It’s time for selfreflection,<br />
<strong>of</strong> course! You might spend it thinking about your life, the people you<br />
love, your career, or the “big questions” in life. Or, you might spend it reading,<br />
researching, or creating art. All <strong>of</strong> these things give you a tendency to go deeper<br />
than others into the topics and pursuits that interest you. (Of course, you also<br />
spend some <strong>of</strong> that time just relaxing and recharging.)<br />
Page 107 <strong>of</strong> 160
12. You seek meaning<br />
When you’re the type <strong>of</strong> person who thinks deeply about your world, it’s hard to<br />
settle for shallow relationships, shallow goals, or shallow conversation. If you<br />
seek a sense <strong>of</strong> meaning in your job and your relationships, and prefer<br />
meaningful conversation over small talk, it could be a sign you are an introvert.<br />
13. You feel out <strong>of</strong> place in an “extroverted” society<br />
Extroverts <strong>of</strong>ten don’t notice it, but our society assumes that people should be<br />
chatty, social and quick to speak up — pretty much all the time. Did you feel<br />
pressure to talk more even at a young age? Did you always feel out <strong>of</strong> place, or<br />
even wonder if there was something wrong with you for not being more social?<br />
This single factor may be the biggest sign you’re an introvert.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are just some <strong>of</strong> the signs <strong>of</strong> an introvert, and not every introvert will match all <strong>of</strong><br />
them. But if you — or someone you love — matches most <strong>of</strong> them, it’s a pretty strong<br />
sign. Want even more? Check out 21 Undeniable Signs You’re an Introvert.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re’s No Such Thing as a Pure Introvert<br />
No two introverts are exactly alike. What’s true for one introvert may be be quite<br />
different for another. Each introvert has a different level <strong>of</strong> tolerance for socializing and<br />
other types <strong>of</strong> stimulation.<br />
Above all, there is no such thing as a pure introvert or extrovert. “Such a man would be<br />
in the lunatic asylum,” the famous psychotherapist Carl Jung once noted. <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
and extroversion are on a spectrum, meaning, they are not all-or-nothing traits.<br />
Everyone acts introverted at times and extroverted at other times. It’s all about what<br />
your preference — in general — tends to be.<br />
If you’re not sure whether you’re more <strong>of</strong> an introvert or more <strong>of</strong> an extrovert, you can<br />
take the introvert quiz and find out.<br />
Can an Introvert Become an Extrovert?<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are two answers to this:<br />
1. No, introverts cannot become extroverts.<br />
2. Why would we want to?<br />
Why we can’t: <strong>The</strong> research is clear that introverts express their temperament from a<br />
young age. In fact, one study by psychologist Jerome Kagan found that it’s possible to<br />
predict which babies will grow up to be introverted based on their reaction to stimuli at<br />
Page 108 <strong>of</strong> 160
just four months old. In other words, if you have an introverted nature, you’re likely to be<br />
that way from birth and remain that way throughout your life.<br />
Why we don’t want to: This speaks to a deeper truth about introverts. <strong>The</strong>re are plenty<br />
<strong>of</strong> introverts out there who wish they could be more outgoing, but this isn’t the same<br />
thing as becoming an extrovert. Introverts, like everyone, can practice their social skills<br />
and become more capable in social situations. But it won’t change the fact that those<br />
interactions drain us.<br />
But, if you’re hoping to become more social, there’s good news:<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is definitely such a thing as an outgoing or “extroverted” introvert…<br />
…and introverts can learn social skills and get good at them with practice.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are lots <strong>of</strong> charming introverts out there, from major stars like Lady Gaga, Audrey<br />
Hepburn and Johnny Depp to many <strong>of</strong> the warm, friendly and charismatic introverts<br />
we’ve met thanks to the Introvert, Dear community. For most <strong>of</strong> us, becoming<br />
comfortable in social situations has simply been a matter <strong>of</strong> practice—even if it seemed<br />
impossible once.<br />
Page 109 <strong>of</strong> 160
Remember: your quiet nature is part <strong>of</strong> who you are—and it’s a good thing. Introverts<br />
who embrace their nature tend to flourish.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y are happier, have better relationships, do better work, and enjoy life because their<br />
minds are well-rested and their energy level is high. <strong>The</strong> best thing you can do if you’re<br />
an introvert is not try to change it, but to take the alone time you need and let your vast<br />
inner world work for you.<br />
________<br />
Introverts Don’t Hate People,<br />
<strong>The</strong>y Hate Shallow Socializing<br />
I like to make jokes about how much I hate people. As an introvert, it’s easy to do. <strong>The</strong><br />
stereotype <strong>of</strong> the misanthropic introvert is backed by countless Facebook memes and<br />
pop culture references: Think <strong>of</strong> the animated character Daria with her oversized<br />
glasses and a book in her hand or that catchy quote from Charles Bukowski, “I don’t<br />
hate people, I just feel better when they aren’t around.”<br />
<strong>The</strong>se memes and quotes exist for a reason. <strong>The</strong>y are funny and relatable, but they can<br />
also serve as a coping mechanism for those who need an excuse to hide behind. It’s<br />
the whole “I’m too school for cool” persona. It’s easy for me to say I spent the majority <strong>of</strong><br />
the party playing with the host’s cat because the people there weren’t half as interesting<br />
as the books I have at home. It’s harder to admit that getting past the barrier <strong>of</strong> small<br />
talk ranges from somewhat daunting to downright terrifying. So I oversimplify and say I<br />
don’t like people, when what I actually dislike are the surface-level interactions <strong>of</strong> most<br />
social gatherings.<br />
We’ve all been to those parties where the sole purpose <strong>of</strong> the event is for everyone to<br />
break into small groups where they talk about sports, the weather, or where the host’s<br />
second cousin got her hair done. It’s moments like these where it suddenly becomes<br />
very important to find out if there’s a pet you can play with, or when all else fails,<br />
perhaps a large potted plant to hide behind. If there’s a drink to be fetched or a bowl <strong>of</strong><br />
chips to be refilled, this task will instantly become the sole purpose <strong>of</strong> my existence,<br />
because literally anything is better than small talk.<br />
However, despite appearances, I don’t hate people. I just hate shallow socializing.<br />
And therein lies the problem that has kept thousands <strong>of</strong> introverts awake until all hours<br />
<strong>of</strong> the night. Because being an introvert doesn’t mean that you want to be alone all the<br />
time. But unfortunately, in order to meet people to share your inner world with, it’s<br />
necessary to go out and socialize. In order to get to those coveted discussions about life<br />
goals, creative passions, and the existence <strong>of</strong> the universe, you sometimes have to start<br />
with some small talk, no matter how painful it might be.<br />
Sometimes an Introvert Has to Go Out to Appreciate Staying In<br />
Page 110 <strong>of</strong> 160
I view socializing much like I view other aspects <strong>of</strong> my life that I know are good for me in<br />
the long run, but really aren’t very enjoyable in the moment. Do I really want to go to the<br />
gym when I could just go home and watch Netflix? No. Do I really want a salad for lunch<br />
when I could have a hamburger? No. Do I really want to go to a party when I could curl<br />
up in bed with a book and a cup <strong>of</strong> tea? It’s a no-brainer. However, to reap the rewards,<br />
you sometimes have to put in the work.<br />
It’s all about balance. Just like I might treat myself to a piece <strong>of</strong> chocolate cake as a<br />
reward for all those days I spent at the gym last week, I’ll spend a quiet Saturday night<br />
at home because I know I already put in a night <strong>of</strong> socializing and interacting with<br />
people outside <strong>of</strong> my comfort zone on Friday.<br />
<strong>The</strong> reward <strong>of</strong> staying in is so much sweeter when it’s saved as its own unique event to<br />
look forward to. Whereas, staying home with a book feels a whole lot less special when<br />
you are doing it for the tenth night in a row. Sometimes you have to go out to fully<br />
appreciate staying in, and vice versa.<br />
Page 111 <strong>of</strong> 160
I never would’ve met some <strong>of</strong> my closest friends if I chose to stay home and read all the<br />
time. Those relationships I have now were worth the anxiety and apprehension I felt<br />
upon venturing out <strong>of</strong> my comfort zone to establish them. Unfortunately, creating those<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> relationships is rare, because socializing doesn’t always have tangible rewards.<br />
Sometimes I leave an event feeling drained and wishing that I had never left the house.<br />
Other times, I might feel that it went okay, but I know the surface-level conversations I<br />
held all evening probably won’t lead to any life-altering friendships. But that’s okay,<br />
because not every conversation or every evening out has to be life-altering.<br />
For an Introvert, Socializing Isn’t Just a Way to Pass the Time<br />
As an introvert, it’s my natural tendency to always want every interaction to be about<br />
establishing a deep connection, but that can put too much pressure on the average<br />
casual conversation. Sometimes it’s just about staying in practice with my (albeit limited)<br />
people skills until the day when someone suddenly wants to talk about their dreams and<br />
goals and all the things that makes them tick. It’s impossible to know where a<br />
conversation will lead unless you try.<br />
I’m aware <strong>of</strong> just how ridiculous my socializing philosophy will sound to extroverts. To<br />
them, socializing itself is the end goal. My extroverted friends are always looking for<br />
something to do on the weekend, during the holidays, and even on work nights. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
pursue socializing for the in-the-moment excitement that it brings. For me, attempting to<br />
socialize is a long-term goal, one that I carefully craft and balance so I don’t get<br />
mentally or emotionally overwhelmed.<br />
“Going out” is rarely exciting for me in the moment. But I always have hope when<br />
attending a party or trying a new networking event that I will make a friend who is also<br />
dying for a quiet cup <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee while chatting about life, or who wants to take a trip to the<br />
beach just so we can lay side by side and read in complete silence.<br />
When I socialize, I’m not looking for a way to just pass the time. I already have a full list<br />
<strong>of</strong> hobbies and interests and not enough hours in the day to enjoy them all. But I am<br />
always looking for a new person with whom I can share my passions and my world.<br />
Sometimes meeting that one new person can be worth the agony <strong>of</strong> socializing. I like to<br />
think I’m the kind <strong>of</strong> person worth socializing for, and I know I’m not the only one <strong>of</strong> my<br />
kind.<br />
So, my fellow introverts, please occasionally put down your books, go out, and search<br />
for the people who make socializing worth it — because I’m out there looking for you.<br />
________<br />
Page 112 <strong>of</strong> 160
12 Things Introverts Absolutely Need<br />
to Be Happy<br />
Introverts have unique needs that are different from those <strong>of</strong> extroverts. We’re not<br />
always looking for the next party, and we may be just as happy staying home. So what<br />
does it take to avoid feeling exhausted and drained? Here are 12 things that just about<br />
every introvert needs to be happy.<br />
What an Introvert Needs to<br />
Be Happy<br />
1. Time to Wind Down After<br />
a Busy Day<br />
An absolute must. Due to<br />
biological wiring, introverts<br />
are sensitive to stimulation<br />
and process information<br />
deeply. Time to unwind<br />
allows them to fully<br />
comprehend the events <strong>of</strong> a<br />
busy day — and lower their<br />
stimulation level to one that’s<br />
more comfortable and<br />
sustainable.<br />
2. Meaningful Conversation<br />
Introverts can’t survive on a<br />
diet <strong>of</strong> small talk alone. “How<br />
was your day?” or “How ’bout this weather?” won’t be enough. Introverts tend to<br />
dive deep, both in their interests and relationships. <strong>The</strong>y need something more:<br />
What’s one new thing you’ve learned lately? How are you a different person<br />
today than you were 10 years ago? Does God exist? Of course, not every<br />
conversation has to be deep. Sometimes introverts really do just want to know<br />
what you did this weekend. But occasionally, to feed their minds and souls, they<br />
need those wide-awake-at-midnight-can’t-stop-talking kind <strong>of</strong> moments.<br />
3. Comfortable Silences<br />
On the flip side, introverts need people in their lives who are content with quiet.<br />
People who can sit in the same room with them, not talking, each doing their own<br />
thing. People who will not nervously jump to fill a pause in the conversation, but<br />
will let thoughts linger, waiting until each idea has been fully digested. Trust<br />
introverts when they say that silence can be beautiful.<br />
Page 113 <strong>of</strong> 160
4. Space To Dive Deep Into <strong>The</strong>ir Hobbies and Interests<br />
17th century horror novels. Celtic mythology. Restoring old cars. Gardening,<br />
painting, cooking, or writing. If it’s out there, introverts are doing it. Having the<br />
time and space to dive deep into their interests is recharging. But it’s about more<br />
than just doing the thing. It’s about slowing down and entering a state <strong>of</strong> flow —<br />
which may come naturally for introverts. Bonus: <strong>The</strong>y end up becoming experts<br />
in their areas <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
5. A Quiet, Calm Space That’s All <strong>The</strong>irs<br />
Admittedly, this is something I don’t have right now. But the dream is real: A<br />
room to be alone in. A room to arrange however I’d like. A room with a door that<br />
closes out the world, even just for a little while. For introverts, having a space<br />
that’s all theirs makes an incredible difference in terms <strong>of</strong> their energy levels.<br />
Being alone — truly alone, without fear <strong>of</strong> intrusion or interruption — is freeing<br />
and invigorating on a nearly spiritual level.<br />
6. Time To Think Before Responding<br />
<strong>The</strong>re’s hardly anything more stressful than an impatient boss or spouse<br />
standing before you demanding an answer right now. For extroverts, it’s usually<br />
easy to spout something <strong>of</strong>f. But not so for introverts, who may rely more on<br />
long-term memory than working memory (for extroverts, it’s the opposite).<br />
Usually, a few (pressure-free) beats is all an introvert needs to reach into their<br />
memory and pull out just the right words they want. Give them that time. It will be<br />
worth it, I promise.<br />
7. Friends Who Understand That Sometimes <strong>The</strong>y Will Stay Home.<br />
Introverts won’t attend every party or get-together. <strong>The</strong>y do enjoy some<br />
socializing, but it’s all about dosage. Too much, and their sensitive systems will<br />
have them begging for their beds. <strong>The</strong>y need friends who understand that<br />
sometimes they just can’t “people” anymore today. <strong>The</strong>se friends know that once<br />
introverts have had downtime, they’ll be up for another (laid-back) adventure.<br />
8. A Deeper Purpose To <strong>The</strong>ir Work<br />
Many introverts want a job that is more than just a paycheck. Sure, they need to<br />
pay their bills, but they want their 9-to-5 efforts to feel worthwhile, too. <strong>The</strong>y want<br />
to know that they’re helping others. That they’re making at least some small<br />
difference in the grand scheme <strong>of</strong> things. If introverts are just punching in and<br />
punching out, doing routine work that doesn’t seem to fit a wider goal, life will feel<br />
hollow.<br />
Page 114 <strong>of</strong> 160
9. Permission To Not Explain Sometimes<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are times when they just have no words. <strong>The</strong>y may be feeling something<br />
strongly, but they can’t describe it. Or they need to be alone right now, but don’t<br />
have the energy to provide a lengthy explanation. When an introvert says, “I don’t<br />
want to talk about it,” or simply, “This is what I need,” let that suffice. After some<br />
time to process, they will likely come back to you with more words.<br />
10. Time And Space To Work Uninterrupted<br />
It’s no secret that introverts do their best work alone. Unfortunately, our <strong>of</strong>fices<br />
and classrooms are not geared toward quiet reflection. As a result, you may find<br />
introverts sneaking away to the abandoned corners <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice building. Or<br />
coming early or staying late. Or begging to stay in the classroom — where it’s<br />
quiet and empty — during recess. To all teachers, supervisors, and parents —<br />
give introverts the quiet space they need to think. You may find that you get<br />
higher quality work in return.<br />
11. <strong>The</strong>ir Tribe<br />
Rarely the ones for chasing popularity, introverts usually have just a few close<br />
friends — and they prefer it that way. However, note that the key word is “close.”<br />
For introverts, friendship isn’t about just occupying the same space, doing the<br />
same activity. Nor is it about trading gossip. It’s about finding a kindred spirit,<br />
someone who will peek into the introvert’s inner world — and reveal theirs in<br />
return.<br />
Page 115 <strong>of</strong> 160
12. Time To Slow Down<br />
Breathe. Take it all in. Just be. Repeat.<br />
Page 116 <strong>of</strong> 160
VII. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
by IntrovertDear.com<br />
Many introverts grow up feeling out <strong>of</strong> place. We live in a fast, noisy world that sees<br />
chattiness as a virtue. Many introverts worry from a young age that something is wrong<br />
with them.<br />
But being an introvert is a gift.<br />
<strong>The</strong> world has a need for people who go deeper, think before they act, and look at<br />
things in new ways.<br />
<strong>The</strong> world has<br />
place<br />
for<br />
a<br />
people<br />
who<br />
value<br />
meaningful<br />
relationships over<br />
meaningless small talk.<br />
And the world is ready for thoughtful, contemplative people who bring calm and<br />
wisdom to a room.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are traits that introverts <strong>of</strong>fer. And, precisely because the world has so many<br />
extroverts, when you step into these traits and own them, you will find that people<br />
appreciate you — and value you.<br />
Why? Well, we’re not all the same, but depending on the introvert, introverts are…<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is an old saying that the person who says the least is also the wisest.<br />
Introverts aren’t born any wiser than anyone else, but we do have an advantage. We<br />
are built to do the kind <strong>of</strong> contemplation that turns into great insight over time.<br />
________<br />
Page 117 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Introversion</strong><br />
by Adam McHugh<br />
I have been writing about introversion for 10 years now. That’s a surprising number <strong>of</strong><br />
words about being quiet. It seems that a lot <strong>of</strong> introverts are finding their words these<br />
days. With so many <strong>of</strong> us taking up our keyboards in recent defense <strong>of</strong> our disposition, I<br />
would wager that there are more words dripping with introversion than ever before.<br />
While I, <strong>of</strong> course, celebrate that, I am troubled when introversion conversations drift in<br />
a particular direction, and that is in pointing out what we are not. I cringe when I see<br />
links to articles with titles such as “Why Introverts Hate Small Talk” or worse: “I Am an<br />
Introvert, Leave Me Alone!”<br />
My concern is that we are giving the world the impression that ours is an orientation<br />
defined by what we lack. We aren’t gregarious, excitable, or charismatic. We dislike<br />
crowds and loud stimulation. We have less energy. Sometimes it’s even implied that we<br />
don’t like other people. It seems that extroversion gets to be defined by what it is, but<br />
introversion is too <strong>of</strong>ten defined by what it isn’t.<br />
I know the confusions circling about the introverted temperament in an extroverted<br />
society, and I understand why we introverts can feel defensive about our social<br />
patterns. But our temperament is now part <strong>of</strong> a broader cultural dialogue, and my hope<br />
is that we can move away from a defensive posture into a more constructive one. Now<br />
that we know that up to half <strong>of</strong> the population falls on the introverted side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spectrum, we no longer have to fight like we are backed into a corner.<br />
I think it’s time to shift the conversation by celebrating the positive side <strong>of</strong> introversion.<br />
<strong>The</strong> more I have settled into my introversion over the past few years, the more I have<br />
come to appreciate its gifts. At this point, I wouldn’t want to be any other way.<br />
Introverts bring a bounty <strong>of</strong> gifts to the table:<br />
<br />
<br />
Introverts bring a sense <strong>of</strong> calm. Far from communicating a stand<strong>of</strong>fish<br />
posture, we attract people because they feel more at peace in our presence. We<br />
have a peacefulness that can help defuse difficult situations, and we show the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> quiet restraint in tense conversations. Our non-reactionary responses<br />
help us—and others—in crisis situations.<br />
Introverts help others slow down. <strong>The</strong>re is one introverted mentor I know who<br />
is a magnet for younger anxious employees because they seem to breathe more<br />
deeply and slowly around him. Have you ever noticed that people actually<br />
breathe differently around you? We can show others that our intrinsic value is not<br />
in how much we accomplish or how busy we are.<br />
Page 118 <strong>of</strong> 160
Introverts are loyal friends. No quote from my book, Introverts in the Church,<br />
has resonated quite like the one I wrote about introverts and friendship:<br />
“Introverts treasure the relationships they have stretched so much to make.” It<br />
may take us a while to warm up to people, but once we’re in, we’re in. We will<br />
prioritize you, and we won’t easily give up our friendship because <strong>of</strong> conflict or<br />
changing life circumstances.<br />
<br />
<br />
Introverts see things. I have <strong>of</strong>ten thought that if someone were to write me into<br />
a novel, I wouldn’t be the protagonist or any other central character; I would be<br />
the narrator. Those <strong>of</strong> us who like to sit on the sidelines and observe others <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
see more than those in the center <strong>of</strong> the action. We notice group dynamics and<br />
individual behaviors that others might miss, which is a reason introverts make<br />
excellent therapists.<br />
Introverts are compassionate. When you have an inward orientation, you go<br />
deep into yourself, and you can see both the good and the bad, the light and the<br />
dark. Honest self-reflection, usually borne out <strong>of</strong> solitude, helps us to extend<br />
Page 119 <strong>of</strong> 160
compassion and forgiveness to others because we know their struggles and<br />
inner contradictions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Introverts are funny. I know a lot <strong>of</strong> introverts, myself included, who spend a fair<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> time sitting quietly, thinking <strong>of</strong> funny things to say. We are <strong>of</strong>ten the<br />
people in the group who don’t lead the conversation but who interject pithy lines<br />
from time to time. Our timing isn’t always great, but when it is, people laugh.<br />
Introverts are creative. Creativity <strong>of</strong>ten seems to come from a deep connection<br />
with our inner world. Underneath the surface are sparks <strong>of</strong> imagination, waiting to<br />
ignite. Because we do our best work in solitude, creative introverts may be less<br />
reliant on established norms and more able to see and hear new things.<br />
Finally, introverts listen. I saved this one for last because I believe listening to be an<br />
exquisite gift and one that our world is desperate for. We all long to be heard—truly<br />
listened to without being judged for what we say or how we think and without being<br />
treated as a mere interruption in another person’s story. <strong>The</strong>re is much more to listening<br />
than not speaking, but not speaking is certainly a good start.<br />
Page 120 <strong>of</strong> 160
VIII. Famous Introverts<br />
23 <strong>of</strong> the Most Amazingly Successful<br />
Introverts in History<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are a lot <strong>of</strong> misconceptions regarding introverts. Here are some <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
successful introverts in history and how you can emulate their success.<br />
by John Rampton<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are a lot <strong>of</strong> misconceptions regarding introverts. Some look at those they<br />
consider to be introverted and toss out all kinds <strong>of</strong> hyperbole, such as, “they are so shy<br />
they would not being able to deliver a speech in a public,” or “she is so shy and<br />
introverted -- she does not like people all.”<br />
However, these prejudicial overstatements rarely hold water. After all, introverts have<br />
been responsible for some <strong>of</strong> the greatest achievements in history, as well as being<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the most successful business and political leaders in the world.<br />
Here are 23 <strong>of</strong> the most successful introverts in history:<br />
1. Albert Einstein<br />
As one <strong>of</strong> the world's most recognized and revered physicists, Einstein has <strong>of</strong>ten been<br />
quoted as saying, “<strong>The</strong> monotony and solitude <strong>of</strong> a quiet life stimulates the creative<br />
mind.” Einstein received the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921 and is best remembered<br />
for developing the theory <strong>of</strong> relativity.<br />
Page 121 <strong>of</strong> 160
2. Rosa Parks<br />
Parks became one <strong>of</strong> the most historically important figures in 1955 after refusing to<br />
give her seat up for a white man. In the introduction <strong>of</strong> her book Quiet: <strong>The</strong> Power Of<br />
Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking, Susan Cain states:<br />
I had always imagined Rosa Parks as a stately woman with a bold temperament,<br />
someone who could easily stand up to a busload <strong>of</strong> glowering passengers. But when she<br />
died in 2005 at the age <strong>of</strong> 92, the flood <strong>of</strong> obituaries recalled her as s<strong>of</strong>t-spoken, sweet,<br />
and small in stature. <strong>The</strong>y said she was ‘timid and shy’ but had ‘the courage <strong>of</strong> a lion.’<br />
<strong>The</strong>y were full <strong>of</strong> phrases like ‘radical humility’ and ‘quiet fortitude.’<br />
3. Bill Gates<br />
<strong>The</strong> founder <strong>of</strong> Micros<strong>of</strong>t, philanthropist, and world's richest person, was<br />
once asked how to succeed in a predominantly extroverted world.<br />
“Well, I think introverts can do quite well. If you're clever you can learn to get the benefits<br />
<strong>of</strong> being an introvert, which might be, say, being willing to go <strong>of</strong>f for a few days and think<br />
about a tough problem, read everything you can, push yourself very hard to think out on<br />
the edge <strong>of</strong> that area. <strong>The</strong>n, if you come up with something, if you want to hire people,<br />
get them excited, build a company around that idea, you better learn what extroverts do,<br />
you better hire some extroverts (like Steve Ballmer I would claim as an extrovert) and tap<br />
into both sets <strong>of</strong> skills in order to have a company that thrives both in deep thinking and<br />
building teams and going out into the world to sell those ideas.”<br />
4. Steven Spielberg<br />
Even one <strong>of</strong> the most successful, wealthiest, and influential personalities in Hollywood is<br />
an introvert. Director and producer Steven Spielberg has admitted as much and says he<br />
would prefer to spend time getting lost into movies.<br />
5. Sir Isaac Newton<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most important figures in science, his Principia formulated the laws <strong>of</strong> motion<br />
and universal gravitation. Isaac Newton was known to be "a deeply introverted<br />
character and fiercely protective <strong>of</strong> his privacy."<br />
6. Eleanor Roosevelt<br />
Though she a shy and retiring individual, Eleanor Roosevelt "was a woman who gave<br />
348 press conferences as First Lady, was a United Nations delegate, a human rights<br />
activist, a teacher, and a lecturer who averaged 150 speaking engagements a year<br />
throughout the 1950s."<br />
7. Mark Zuckerberg<br />
Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg told <strong>The</strong> New York Times in 2010 that Zuckerberg, the<br />
founder and CEO <strong>of</strong> the social network site, "is shy and introverted and he <strong>of</strong>ten does<br />
Page 122 <strong>of</strong> 160
not seem very warm to people who don't know him, but he is warm." She added, "He<br />
really cares about the people who work here."<br />
8. Larry Page<br />
<strong>The</strong> co-founder <strong>of</strong> Google, Page became the search engine's CEO in 2011. Many<br />
believed that Page was an odd choice for CEO because he's "personally reserved,<br />
unabashedly geeky, and said to be introverted."<br />
9. Al Gore<br />
<strong>The</strong> former vice president, presidential candidate, and author <strong>of</strong> An Inconvenient<br />
Truth is another public figure who found success despite being an introvert.<br />
10. Marissa Mayer<br />
<strong>The</strong> current Yahoo! CEO may be well-known, but Mayer still believes in quiet leadership<br />
and has admitted that, "I'm just geeky and shy and I like to code…"<br />
11. Abraham Lincoln<br />
<strong>The</strong> introverted leadership skills <strong>of</strong> the 16th U.S. president have been studied <strong>of</strong>ten by<br />
researchers and educators because <strong>of</strong> his "geekiness," dignity, and quietness.<br />
Page 123 <strong>of</strong> 160
12. JK Rowling<br />
<strong>The</strong> creator <strong>of</strong> Harry Potter came up with the idea <strong>of</strong> her most famous character while<br />
traveling from Manchester to London. Rowling recalls, "I had been writing almost<br />
continuously since the age <strong>of</strong> 6 but I had never been so excited about an idea before.<br />
To my immense frustration, I didn’t have a pen that worked, and I was too shy to ask<br />
anybody if I could borrow one... "<br />
13. Warren Buffett<br />
Known as the Oracle <strong>of</strong> Omaha, Warren Buffett is known as one <strong>of</strong> the most successful<br />
introverts and businessmen in the world. According to Buffett, when he started out, he<br />
had the "intellect for business," but he felt he had to enroll in Dale Carnegie's, "How to<br />
Win Friends and Influence People" course <strong>of</strong> seminars, because he didn't have a<br />
business persona.<br />
14. Mahatma Gandhi<br />
Known for being the master <strong>of</strong> nonviolent resistance, Gandhi once said, “In a gentle<br />
way, you can shake the world.”<br />
15. Hillary Clinton<br />
<strong>The</strong> former First Lady, Secretary <strong>of</strong> State, and current presidential candidate isn't an<br />
extrovert like her husband Bill. This might be why some people believe that Clinton isn't<br />
that warm <strong>of</strong> a person.<br />
16. Michael Jordan<br />
His Airness is one <strong>of</strong> the greatest basketball players <strong>of</strong> all-time. He also happens to be<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the greatest introvert athletes.<br />
17. Charles Darwin<br />
<strong>The</strong> renowned scientists and author <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Origin <strong>of</strong> Species was a quiet type who<br />
enjoyed solitude.<br />
18. Meryl Streep<br />
Like many actors and actresses, Meryl Streep is a known introvert. However, Streep is<br />
a three-time Academy Award winner who is known for her preparation in becoming<br />
every character she has portrayed.<br />
Page 124 <strong>of</strong> 160
19. Elon Musk<br />
<strong>The</strong> founder <strong>of</strong> PayPal, Space X, and Tesla has been open about how he went from an<br />
"introverted engineer" to being the next Steve Jobs.<br />
20. Dr. Seuss<br />
Arguably one <strong>of</strong> the greatest children's book authors <strong>of</strong> all-time wrote his stories alone,<br />
and according to Susan Cain, "was afraid <strong>of</strong> meeting the kids who read his books for<br />
fear they would be disappointed at how quiet he was."<br />
21. Frederic Chopin<br />
This world-renowned and inspirational composer was so introverted that he gave only<br />
about 30 public performances in his lifetime. Instead, he played for small groups <strong>of</strong><br />
friends and made a living by selling his compositions and teaching piano. Chopin’s most<br />
quiet and troubled times have become known as his most productive composition<br />
periods.<br />
22. Steve Wozniak<br />
<strong>The</strong> Apple co-founder described his creative process in his book iWoz as follows:<br />
“I'm going to give you some advice that might be hard to take.<br />
That advice is: Work alone. Not on a committee. Not on a team.”<br />
Page 125 <strong>of</strong> 160
23. Barack Obama<br />
<strong>The</strong> current president <strong>of</strong> the United States made history in 2008 by becoming the first<br />
African-American elected into the <strong>of</strong>fice. He's also a known introvert. In fact, columnist<br />
David Brooks stated in the <strong>The</strong> New York Times, "Being led by Barack Obama is like<br />
being trumpeted into battle by Miles Davis. He makes you want to sit down and<br />
discern."<br />
Here’s to all the other introverts in the world!<br />
Page 126 <strong>of</strong> 160
IX. References<br />
1. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-introversion-2795995<br />
2. http://nymag.com/science<strong>of</strong>us/2015/06/apparently-there-are-four-kinds-<strong>of</strong>introversion.html<br />
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraversion_and_introversion<br />
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety<br />
5. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/difference-social-anxietyintroversion_us_5adf5e6de4b07560f3961226<br />
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits<br />
7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers%E2%80%93Briggs_Type_Indicator<br />
8. https://introvertdear.com/what-is-an-introvert-definition/<br />
9. https://www.quietrev.com/the-gifts-<strong>of</strong>-introversion/<br />
10. https://www.inc.com/john-rampton/23-amazingly-successful-introverts-throughouthistory.html<br />
11.<br />
http://www.sbschools.org/parents_students/partnerships/parent_academy/docs/SBPA_2<br />
015-03-19_Quiet_Quiz.pdf<br />
12. https://lajudicialcollege.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Introverts-Paper.pdf<br />
13. https://www.quietrev.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/QR_ebookMay8-2015.pdf<br />
14. https://www.inc.com/john-rampton/23-amazingly-successful-introverts-throughouthistory.html<br />
Page 127 <strong>of</strong> 160
Notes<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Page 128 <strong>of</strong> 160
Notes<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Page 129 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 130 <strong>of</strong> 160
Attachment A<br />
Quiet Quiz:<br />
Are You An Introvert or An Extrovert?<br />
Page 131 <strong>of</strong> 160
Quiet Quiz: Are You an Introvert or an Extrovert?<br />
This is an informal 12 question quiz, adapted from Quiet by Susan Cain, based on characteristics <strong>of</strong> introversion commonly<br />
accepted by contemporary researchers.<br />
1. I prefer one-on-one conversations to group activities.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
2. I <strong>of</strong>ten prefer to express myself in writing.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
3. I enjoy solitude.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
4. I seem to care about wealth, fame, and status less than my peers.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
5. People tell me that I'm a good listener.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
6. I'm not a big risk-taker.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
7. I enjoy work that allows me to "dive in" with few interruptions.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
8. I like to celebrate birthdays on a small scale, with only one or two close friends or family<br />
members.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
9. People describe me as "s<strong>of</strong>t-spoken" or "mellow."<br />
True<br />
False<br />
10. I prefer not to show or discuss my work with others until it's finished.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
11. I tend to think before I speak.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
12. I <strong>of</strong>ten let calls go through to voice-mail.<br />
True<br />
False<br />
Turn to the back to see what your score means
Congratulations - you have completed the Quiet Quiz: Are You an Introvert or an Extrovert?<br />
Your personality pr<strong>of</strong>ile: I. (I = Introvert. E = Extrovert)<br />
Your Personality Pr<strong>of</strong>ile:<br />
I = Introvert. If you answered the majority <strong>of</strong> the questions<br />
true, you're probably an introvert. Given the choice, you'll devote<br />
your social energy to the people you care about most, preferring a glass<br />
<strong>of</strong> wine with a close friend to a party full <strong>of</strong> strangers. You think before<br />
you speak, and relish solitude. You feel energized when focusing deeply<br />
on a subject or activity that really interests you. You have an active<br />
inner life, and are at your best when you tap into its riches.<br />
E/I = Ambivert. If you answered the questions evenly, true<br />
and false, you're probably an ambivert - meaning that you fall<br />
smack in the middle <strong>of</strong> the introvert-extrovert spectrum. In many<br />
ways, ambiverts have the best <strong>of</strong> both worlds, able to tap into either<br />
pole as needed.<br />
E = Extrovert. If you answered the majority <strong>of</strong> the questions<br />
false, you’re probably an extrovert. You relish social life, and are<br />
energized by interacting with friends and strangers alike. You are<br />
assertive, go-getting, and able to seize the day. You're great at thinking<br />
on your feet, and are relatively comfortable with conflict. You are<br />
actively engaged in the world around you, and are at your best when<br />
you tap into its energy.<br />
Why does it matter where you fall on the introvert-extrovert spectrum? Because introversion and extroversion are at the heart <strong>of</strong><br />
human nature. And when you make life choices that are congruent with your temperament, you unleash vast stores <strong>of</strong> energy.<br />
Conversely, when you spend too much time battling your own nature, the opposite happens—you deplete yourself. Too many<br />
people live lives that don't suit them—introverts with frenetic social schedules, extroverts with jobs that require them to sit in<br />
front <strong>of</strong> their computers for hours at a stretch. We all have to do things that don't come naturally—some <strong>of</strong> the time. But it<br />
shouldn't be all the time. It shouldn't even be most <strong>of</strong> the time.<br />
(Remember, though, that no one is all introvert or all extrovert. Introverts attend wild parties, and extroverts<br />
curl up with their favorite books. As the psychologist Carl Jung put it, "<strong>The</strong>re is no such thing as a pure<br />
extrovert or a pure introvert. Such a man would be in the lunatic asylum.")
Page 132 <strong>of</strong> 160
Attachment B<br />
Introverts vs. Extroverts:<br />
Is <strong>The</strong>re an IT Personality<br />
Page 133 <strong>of</strong> 160
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IS THERE AN<br />
IT<br />
PERSONALITY?<br />
New report blends research and testimonials from 465<br />
IT pr<strong>of</strong>essionals with existing opinion on introversion<br />
in the workplace. This aims to shed some light on the<br />
complex mix <strong>of</strong> personalities that make up the modern<br />
world <strong>of</strong> IT.
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
Introduction<br />
Back in the 1950s the sales force at IBM would gather each morning for a hearty sing-song. This began with “Ever<br />
Onward”, the company mantra, and was followed by an even more vigorous performance <strong>of</strong> “Selling IBM” to the<br />
tune <strong>of</strong> “Singing in the Rain” – a piece which built up to the climactic close: “We’re always in trim, we work with a<br />
vim. We’re selling, just selling IBM.” After that, the team would head <strong>of</strong>f to their desks to begin their sales calls.<br />
To some people the mere description <strong>of</strong> this early-morning ritual would be enough to strike terror into their<br />
hearts, and the event itself would leave them feeling so physically drained, they’d need a little lie down<br />
afterwards. Yet for others, this would sound like an excellent plan and a fantastic place to work all round – and by<br />
9.30am they’d be bursting with enthusiasm and energy to do their jobs.<br />
Your personal reaction will partly come down to<br />
whatever it is you have to do all day. However, it will<br />
also be part and parcel <strong>of</strong> your innate personality<br />
type. And if you’re an introvert, chances are you<br />
would prefer to avoid the sing-along session.<br />
“<br />
IDG<br />
Why enter a career in IT unless you are<br />
an ‘introverted’ geek with no social<br />
skills?<br />
Connect<br />
Many people choose their jobs based on their personal preferences. If you can’t stand children you’re not likely<br />
to become a primary school teacher. Yet it is not as cut and dried as many think and, as we all know, it is common<br />
to make incorrect assumptions about people, based on what they do. Who would believe anyone would become<br />
a TV presenter unless they were an over-confident narcissist? And why enter a career in IT unless you are an<br />
‘introverted’ geek with no social skills?<br />
Through this short report we discuss what introversion really means in practice, how prevalent it is across IT and<br />
how this ties into the bigger, ever-changing, IT and business landscape. This document includes new research<br />
drawn from a global pool <strong>of</strong> 465 IT pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, first-person testimonials from respondents, along with a range<br />
<strong>of</strong> in-depth interviews with industry experts and introverted leaders.<br />
What is an Introvert?<br />
“I soon discovered there is no all-purpose definition <strong>of</strong> introversion or extroversion,” wrote Susan Cain, author<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ground-breaking work <strong>of</strong> non-fiction, ‘Quiet: <strong>The</strong> Power <strong>of</strong> Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking’.<br />
“<strong>The</strong>re are almost as many definitions <strong>of</strong> introvert and extrovert as there are personality psychologists, who<br />
spend a great deal <strong>of</strong> time arguing over which meaning is more accurate,” she continued. This said, she did find<br />
some clear points <strong>of</strong> agreement amongst this fragmented community:<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
Introverts and extroverts differ in the level <strong>of</strong> outside stimulation they need - introverts tend to<br />
become drained by too much external interaction while extroverts thrive on it<br />
Introverts tend to work differently from extroverts - these tackle tasks quickly while introverts tend to<br />
work more slowly and deliberately<br />
Introverts may have strong social skills but they listen more than they talk and <strong>of</strong>ten feel they express<br />
themselves better in writing than in conversation - many dislike conflict<br />
2
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
“<strong>The</strong> word introversion is not a synonym for hermit or misanthrope,” stressed Cain. “Introverts can be these<br />
things but most are perfectly friendly. Nor are introverts necessarily shy. Shyness is the fear <strong>of</strong> social humiliation<br />
or disapproval, while introversion is a preference for environments that are not over-stimulating. Shyness is<br />
inherently painful; introversion is not.”<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are certainly a lot <strong>of</strong> misconceptions about introversion. And Cain argues that this group <strong>of</strong> people, which<br />
makes up a third to half <strong>of</strong> the corporate US depending on where you get your statistics, has also been ignored in<br />
most workplaces.<br />
Yet for IT pr<strong>of</strong>essionals this negative, incorrect view <strong>of</strong> introversion goes one step further. Despite being the<br />
greatest enabler <strong>of</strong> our age, the whole pr<strong>of</strong>ession has been coloured by the notion that it is exclusively populated<br />
by nerds and geeks with zero social skills. This has nothing to do with real-life introversion, but it can have an<br />
impact on the people IT attracts, especially girls [2013 research PDF]. And many argue this could actively hinder<br />
innovation.<br />
As one survey respondent put it: “One <strong>of</strong> the biggest disservices to our industry is the cultural stereotype <strong>of</strong><br />
the super-introverted, socially maladjusted techie nerd. In fact, all kinds <strong>of</strong> people succeed, but, because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
public misconceptions, too many brilliant, outgoing people - especially women - never even consider enrolling in<br />
a computing college. It’s a loss for all...”<br />
What Does Our Research Show About <strong>Introversion</strong> in IT?<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is one problem with the the direct split between introverts and extroverts - it leaves no room for the<br />
middle way: ambiverts. This is briefly acknowledged in Cain’s book, but then quickly skirted over. With this<br />
in mind, and in order to gain the most accurate gauge <strong>of</strong> what percentage <strong>of</strong> our audience actively identified<br />
themselves as introverts, we also included an ambiverts option in the questionnaire.<br />
Interestingly, just over half (53%) <strong>of</strong> 465 pr<strong>of</strong>essionals we surveyed said they were introverts, 24% said they were<br />
ambiverts, 20% said they were extroverts, while 3% didn’t know. This certainly does seem to suggest a slightly<br />
higher level <strong>of</strong> introversion than average. This is by no means a negative thing, it simply correlates with a lot <strong>of</strong><br />
the core work that IT pr<strong>of</strong>essionals have to do.<br />
What personality type are you?<br />
53%<br />
INTROVERT<br />
24%<br />
AMBIVERT<br />
20%<br />
EXTROVERT<br />
IDG Connect research<br />
3
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was also a clear personal preference towards introverts amongst the introvert community, possibly<br />
because it has tended to be undervalued.<br />
Shawn Eadens, a Senior Management Consultant, concurred with this point: “<strong>The</strong>re is a big difference between<br />
perception and performance for introverts in the workplace and society in general. <strong>The</strong> introvert is significantly<br />
undervalued and underappreciated for their multi-faceted contributions.”<br />
John Perry, a Senior Server Engineer and IT Architect at City <strong>of</strong> Mesa, Arizona, added: “We don't market ourselves<br />
well. [Although] if we are accomplished in what we do, our ideas, products or others sell us.”<br />
In fact, our survey showed that 49% <strong>of</strong> introverts pr<strong>of</strong>iled believe that introverts are better suited to a career in<br />
IT. Whilst only 24% <strong>of</strong> ambiverts and 22% <strong>of</strong> extroverts thought introverts were better suited. Obviously, there<br />
are a range <strong>of</strong> skill-sets involved in any IT career, but this does suggest a quiet confidence for introverts amongst<br />
other introverts, which is not necessarily shared by others.<br />
Are some personality types better suited to careers in tech?<br />
Introverts<br />
Ambiverts<br />
Extroverts<br />
4%<br />
introverts think<br />
extroverts are better<br />
suited to careers in the<br />
tech industry<br />
49%<br />
introverts think<br />
introverts are better<br />
suited to careers in<br />
the tech industry<br />
13%<br />
ambiverts think<br />
extroverts are better<br />
suited to careers in the<br />
tech industry<br />
24%<br />
ambiverts think<br />
introverts are better<br />
suited to careers in<br />
the tech industry<br />
23%<br />
extroverts think<br />
extroverts are better<br />
suited to careers in the<br />
tech industry<br />
22%<br />
extroverts think<br />
introverts are better<br />
suited to careers in<br />
the tech industry<br />
47%<br />
introverts think<br />
neither are better<br />
suited to careers in<br />
the tech industry<br />
63%<br />
ambiverts think<br />
neither are better<br />
suited to careers in<br />
the tech industry<br />
55%<br />
extroverts think<br />
neither are better<br />
suited to careers in<br />
the tech industry<br />
IDG Connect research<br />
Sarah Cain argued strongly for the importance <strong>of</strong> introverts in a variety <strong>of</strong> functions and cited numerous studies<br />
which showed the propensity for these individuals to perform highly concentrated analytical work. Our survey<br />
respondents weighed into this subject from a variety <strong>of</strong> angles:<br />
“I think there is too much value placed on extroversion,” wrote one respondent. “People who speak loudly and<br />
confidently don't necessarily have the best ideas, and those who struggle to speak up or articulate their ideas<br />
don't necessarily have bad ideas or no ideas. I think it's unfortunately a natural response to side with someone<br />
who is comfortable speaking up, because they're able to give you information; it's something that introverts must<br />
cope with if they are to find happiness in their work.”<br />
4
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
Another disagreed: “In my opinion, there is a critical shortage <strong>of</strong> extroverts. Too many pr<strong>of</strong>essionals rest solely on<br />
their technical prowess, and simply feel no need to improve their ability to interact effectively with others.”<br />
One extrovert wrote: “I've had to work against perceptions like ‘Why aren't you just getting down to it?’ I've also<br />
had to deal with a perception that, being a little ‘noisier’ than an ‘I’ [introvert] with the same job, I am more high<br />
maintenance.”<br />
Another <strong>of</strong>fered a more middle view: “I believe<br />
the issue is that introverts are more likely to<br />
put in long hours in R&D, while extroverts are<br />
more likely to have holistic understandings <strong>of</strong><br />
the business and market. Having one or the<br />
other fails to address the true synergy that<br />
comes from having IT align with the business.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> main aim <strong>of</strong> psychological pr<strong>of</strong>iling<br />
techniques is so people can understand<br />
themselves in order to overcome their natural “weaknesses, not to pigeonhole them.<br />
IDG Connect<br />
Perhaps the whole issue <strong>of</strong> introversion and extroversion has been blown out <strong>of</strong> all proportion then? After all,<br />
the main aim <strong>of</strong> psychological pr<strong>of</strong>iling techniques is so people can understand themselves in order to overcome<br />
their natural weaknesses, not to pigeonhole them. Yet this is precisely why introversion has come to play such a<br />
core role in pr<strong>of</strong>essionals’ conception <strong>of</strong> themselves - it is integral to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.<br />
What is the MBTI Indicator?<br />
<strong>The</strong> Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, or MBTI, is based on the writings <strong>of</strong> Carl Jung. It is currently used by 89 <strong>of</strong><br />
the Fortune 100 companies and is probably the most common personality test out there. It has also proved so<br />
ludicrously popular that a range <strong>of</strong> t-shirts, mugs and other memorabilia are available to interested parties.<br />
<strong>The</strong> flip side, <strong>of</strong> course, is it has received a lot <strong>of</strong> criticism. This has ranged from the way it is used by businesses<br />
to hire and categorise people, through to scepticism on the scientific validity <strong>of</strong> the test itself. One <strong>of</strong> the chief<br />
censures levelled at it is that many <strong>of</strong> those pr<strong>of</strong>iled emerge as a different ‘type’ the second time they take the<br />
test.<br />
For those not au fait: MBTI is based on four scales. <strong>The</strong>se (loosely) cover: how you interact with the world<br />
(<strong>Introversion</strong>/Extroversion); how you take in information (Sensing/Intuition); how you make decisions (Thinking/<br />
Feeling); and how you organise yourself (Judging/Perceiving).<br />
This makes a certain amount <strong>of</strong> sense if you study the underlying idea. But part <strong>of</strong> the issue with the test<br />
(especially simple online versions) is that multiple choice questions <strong>of</strong>ten give rise to a range <strong>of</strong> silly, erroneous<br />
conclusions. For example: “Do you feel involved when watching TV soaps?” might indicate more <strong>of</strong> an inclination<br />
towards liking this type <strong>of</strong> television, than any innate tendency to sympathise with fellow human beings.<br />
Cherie Haynie, a leadership consultant for the publisher <strong>of</strong> the Myers-Briggs Indicator tool CPP who helps<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals use the tool ethically, is keen to stress that it should only be used with a registered practitioner.<br />
Otherwise the results will be inaccurate and could prove unhelpful.<br />
5
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
However, if people do want to look into this further on their own, books like Do What You Are provide numerous<br />
practical examples <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the four states and helps readers to analyse themselves on a sliding scale. This is<br />
still not entirely foolpro<strong>of</strong> but makes considerably more sense than the tick box online approach.<br />
It also serves to highlight the point that any personality test is definitely more relevant as an internal measure<br />
than an external monitor. Whichever way you’re assessed however, some <strong>of</strong> the four functions are far harder to<br />
pinpoint than others and some have been more widely discredited. <strong>The</strong> most respected part <strong>of</strong> all is actually the<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong>/Extroversion element.<br />
Explanation <strong>of</strong> the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator<br />
Extroversion<br />
Preference tells us<br />
where people get<br />
their energy<br />
<strong>Introversion</strong><br />
Prefers interaction with others.<br />
Tend to be action oriented.<br />
Learn by teaching others.<br />
Sensing<br />
Rely on senses. Detail<br />
oriented. Prefer organised,<br />
linear & structured approach.<br />
Perceives by<br />
directly observing<br />
reality or through<br />
impressions <strong>of</strong><br />
imagining<br />
possibilities<br />
Intuition<br />
Seeks out patterns &<br />
relationships. <strong>The</strong>y trust<br />
hunches.<br />
Thinking<br />
Decide impersonally based<br />
on logic & principle. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
have clear goals and<br />
objectives.<br />
How to make<br />
decisions either<br />
through logic or<br />
by using fairness<br />
and human<br />
values<br />
Feeling<br />
Decide by focusing on<br />
human values and needs.<br />
Values empathy.<br />
Judging<br />
Decisive and self starters.<br />
Focus on completing the<br />
task. <strong>The</strong>y plan their work<br />
& work their plan.<br />
Indicates how the<br />
learner views the<br />
world, either a<br />
structured values<br />
environment or<br />
spontaneous<br />
environment<br />
Perceiving<br />
6
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
What is the Bigger Picture on Introverts in IT?<br />
Cherie Haynie provided IDG Connect with an extensive<br />
dataset on MBTI types from CPP based on 19,632<br />
IT employees and 465 IT executives along with a<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> non-retail sales managers to give some<br />
perspective. From these, the two most frequently<br />
occurring types amongst IT employees emerge as ISTJ<br />
(19.4%) and ESTJ (13.6%).<br />
This is interesting because, although the focus for IT<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals is usually on introversion, this extremely<br />
large dataset reveals, in fact, only 54.5% (hardly more<br />
than half, but still more than double the volume <strong>of</strong><br />
sales managers) are pr<strong>of</strong>iled as introverts. And a very<br />
significant number come out as ESTJ.<br />
This is even truer amongst the smaller (465) sample<br />
<strong>of</strong> IT executives, where only 50.4% are pr<strong>of</strong>iled as<br />
introverts: fewer (IT employees, 17.2%) are ISTJ and<br />
more are ESTJ (14.2%) than the employees. Although<br />
the really marked difference amongst IT leaders is the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> INTP at 10.3%, compared to 7.9% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
IT Employees:<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> the 16 Myers-Briggs<br />
Personalities<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are cut down descriptions taken<br />
directly from the Myers & Briggs<br />
Foundation<br />
ISTJ<br />
Quiet, serious, earn success by thoroughness and<br />
dependability. Practical, matter-<strong>of</strong>-fact, realistic,<br />
and responsible.<br />
ISFJ<br />
Quiet, friendly, responsible, and conscientious.<br />
Committed and steady in meeting their obligations.<br />
INFJ<br />
Seek meaning and connection in ideas,<br />
relationships, and material possessions. Want<br />
to understand what motivates people and are<br />
insightful about others.<br />
INTJ<br />
Have original minds and great drive for<br />
implementing their ideas and achieving their goals.<br />
Quickly see patterns in external events and develop<br />
long-range explanatory perspectives.<br />
SENSING<br />
INTUITION<br />
Thinking Feeling Feeling Thinking<br />
ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ<br />
19.4% 4.7% 2.0% 6.5%<br />
ISTP ISFP INFP INTP<br />
7.7% 2.6% 3.7% 7.9%<br />
ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP<br />
5.8% 2.6% 4.6% 7.0%<br />
ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ<br />
13.6% 4.1% 2.1% 5.7%<br />
N= 19,632 IT employees from CPP data<br />
= Top 3<br />
Judging Perceiving Perceiving Judging<br />
INTROVERISON EXTROVERISON<br />
ISTP<br />
Tolerant and flexible, quiet observers until a<br />
problem appears, then act quickly to find workable<br />
solutions. Analyse what makes things work and<br />
readily get through large amounts <strong>of</strong> data to isolate<br />
the core <strong>of</strong> practical problems.<br />
ISFP<br />
Quiet, friendly, sensitive, and kind. Enjoy the<br />
present moment, what’s going on around them.<br />
Like to have their own space and to work within<br />
their own time frame.<br />
INFP<br />
Idealistic, loyal to their values and to people who<br />
are important to them. Want an external life that<br />
is congruent with their values. Curious, quick to<br />
see possibilities, can be catalysts for implementing<br />
ideas.<br />
INTP<br />
Seek to develop logical explanations for everything<br />
that interests them. <strong>The</strong>oretical and abstract,<br />
interested more in ideas than in social interaction.<br />
7
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
IT Executives:<br />
SENSING<br />
INTUITION<br />
Thinking Feeling Feeling Thinking<br />
ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ<br />
17.2% 3.2% 2.2% 7.3%<br />
ISTP ISFP INFP INTP<br />
5.4% 1.1% 3.7% 10.3%<br />
ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP<br />
4.3% 1.9% 3.2% 11.6%<br />
ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ<br />
14.2% 4.1% 1.5% 8.8%<br />
Judging Perceiving Perceiving Judging<br />
INTROVERISON EXTROVERISON<br />
ESTP<br />
Flexible and tolerant, they take a pragmatic<br />
approach focused on immediate results. <strong>The</strong>ories<br />
and conceptual explanations bore them – they<br />
want to act energetically to solve the problem.<br />
ESFP<br />
Outgoing, friendly, and accepting. Exuberant<br />
lovers <strong>of</strong> life, people, and material comforts. Enjoy<br />
working with others to make things happen.<br />
ENFP<br />
Warmly enthusiastic and imaginative. See life as<br />
full <strong>of</strong> possibilities. Make connections between<br />
events and information very quickly, and<br />
confidently proceed based on the patterns they<br />
see.<br />
N= 465 IT executives from CPP data<br />
= Top 3<br />
ENTP<br />
Quick, ingenious, stimulating, alert, and outspoken.<br />
Resourceful in solving new and challenging<br />
problems.<br />
Non-retail sales managers:<br />
ESTJ<br />
Practical, realistic, matter-<strong>of</strong>-fact. Decisive, quickly<br />
move to implement decisions. Organise projects<br />
and people to get things done, focus on getting<br />
results in the most efficient way possible.<br />
SENSING<br />
INTUITION<br />
Thinking Feeling Feeling Thinking<br />
ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ<br />
9.5% 2.1% 1.2% 2.6%<br />
ISTP ISFP INFP INTP<br />
3.0% 1.2% 1.5% 3.0%<br />
ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP<br />
8.2% 3.3% 7.0% 10.3%<br />
ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ<br />
24.6% 6.8% 4.6% 11.1%<br />
Judging Perceiving Perceiving Judging<br />
INTROVERISON EXTROVERISON<br />
ESFJ<br />
Warmhearted, conscientious, and cooperative.<br />
Want harmony in their environment, work with<br />
determination to establish it.<br />
ENFJ<br />
Warm, empathetic, responsive, and responsible.<br />
Highly attuned to the emotions, needs, and<br />
motivations <strong>of</strong> others.<br />
ENTJ<br />
Frank, decisive, assume leadership readily. Quickly<br />
see illogical and inefficient procedures and policies,<br />
develop and implement comprehensive systems to<br />
solve organisational problems.<br />
N= 6,284 non-retail sales managers from CPP data<br />
= Top 3<br />
8
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
general IT workforce.<br />
This tallies with the views <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> our survey respondents who suggested: “It is less about ‘I’ and ‘E’ (Myers-<br />
Briggs) than about Thinking versus Feeling (T & F) and Intuition versus Sensing (N & S). A blend <strong>of</strong> people with<br />
different temperaments within any one team/department is likely to be the most successful as each brings<br />
different approaches and different strengths to the group.”<br />
Slightly contradictory research from Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Joe Peppard<br />
at the European School <strong>of</strong> Management and Technology in<br />
Berlin found that 85% <strong>of</strong> CIOs are introverts and 70% fall<br />
into the Myers Briggs personality type ISTJ. Although CIOs<br />
are never specifically isolated in the CPP studies as all IT<br />
executive functions are covered.<br />
To put it bluntly, ISTJ translates<br />
to the classic ‘geek’ image <strong>of</strong><br />
a highly analytical individual<br />
“with poor people skills.<br />
IDG Connect<br />
What is clear from all this is that a higher than average proportion <strong>of</strong> individuals are pr<strong>of</strong>iled as ISTJ in IT. <strong>The</strong> true<br />
level <strong>of</strong> these is hard to accurately gauge, as executive and employee roles differ so much across the spectrum.<br />
<strong>The</strong> real significance is also hard to quantify as these innate traits display themselves differently in different<br />
people. Yet it does show something about the types <strong>of</strong> people the pr<strong>of</strong>ession tends to attract.<br />
What Might All this Mean for Leadership?<br />
To put it bluntly, ISTJ translates to the classic ‘geek’ image <strong>of</strong> a highly analytical individual with poor people<br />
skills. It breaks down to ‘I’ for <strong>Introversion</strong> over Extroversion, ‘S’ for Sensing over Intuiting – which relates to<br />
more literal methods <strong>of</strong> acquiring information – ‘T’ for Thinking over Feeling – which suggests a more analytical<br />
approach to decision making – and ‘J’ for Judging over Perceiving – which indicates a preference towards<br />
processes and time keeping. (See ‘Explanation’ on page 6)<br />
“<br />
What we have found<br />
more recently is that the<br />
stereotype <strong>of</strong> the technical<br />
person being a geek is<br />
starting to break down.<br />
Cherie Haynie, CPP<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Joe Peppard told Computerworld in April that these<br />
individuals can be great at their jobs but are not necessarily<br />
equipped for leadership. “ISTJs have a strong sense <strong>of</strong> responsibility<br />
and great loyalty to the organisations and relationships in their<br />
lives. <strong>The</strong>y rely upon knowledge and experience to guide them<br />
and pay attention to immediate and practical organisational needs.<br />
Generally preferring to work alone, they can be relied upon to fulfil<br />
commitments as stated and on time.”<br />
He continued: “<strong>The</strong>y would be described as practical, pragmatic and sensible, but could also be seen as<br />
detached, inflexible and overly serious. <strong>The</strong>y strive for perfection and can be poor at delegation. <strong>The</strong>y have a<br />
tendency to get bogged down in the detail and failing to see the ‘wood from the trees’.”<br />
Haynie <strong>of</strong> CPP was keen to point out, however, that whilst there has always been a traditional preference towards<br />
introversion and “concrete information” amongst people who go into IT careers, things are beginning to change.<br />
“What we have found more recently is that the stereotype <strong>of</strong> the technical person being a geek is starting to<br />
break down. <strong>The</strong>re is such a broad range <strong>of</strong> expertise and talents needed [in IT] outside that closed door <strong>of</strong><br />
computer programming. <strong>The</strong>re needs to be a range [<strong>of</strong> people] who can be visionary, look into the future, stay on<br />
top <strong>of</strong> trends and be very collaborative with other organisational leaders. It is not the IT <strong>of</strong> 20 years ago.”<br />
9
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
“<strong>The</strong> leaders in IT roles today are responsible for helping others to grow and develop [and] it is not just the<br />
computer skills that were [previously] required <strong>of</strong> them.” You could argue that leadership skills are the same,<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> industry.<br />
“<br />
scales<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the core ways in which<br />
Myers-Briggs is misunderstood, is<br />
that it doesn’t take into account<br />
<strong>of</strong> the indifferent attributes.<br />
IDG Connect<br />
Haynie feels the biggest differentiator amongst leaders<br />
is how self-aware they are. “It is not just knowing<br />
what your Myers-Briggs type is,” she explained.<br />
“That information by itself, is not very useful. We’re<br />
responsible for our [own] pr<strong>of</strong>essional lives. Anyone can<br />
be a successful leader, if they are aware <strong>of</strong> what they<br />
need to develop.”<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the core ways in which Myers-Briggs is misunderstood, is that it doesn’t take into account scales <strong>of</strong> the<br />
indifferent attributes, for example, introversion. “Myers-Briggs just shows what you were born with,” added<br />
Haynie “it doesn’t show you how much you use it, or show it.” If you have two people and one appears to be<br />
a hardcore introvert while the other appears to be slightly introverted, according to the theory, they were<br />
probably born with the same predisposition. <strong>The</strong> extent they display this characteristic actually comes down to<br />
environment.<br />
Do INTJs Make the Best IT Leaders?<br />
Fascinatingly, in the process <strong>of</strong> researching introvert IT leaders, all those who stepped forward to talk to us were<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iled as INTJs although these only count for 7.3% <strong>of</strong> CPP’s executive data set. Maybe this comes down to the<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> this personality type? <strong>The</strong>se individuals certainly identify strongly with their type and have<br />
formed numerous networking groups on LinkedIn. Conversely, there is only one subgroup for ISTJs and this has<br />
17 members.<br />
Senior Management Consultant Shawn Eadens believes that<br />
the N over S has stood him in good stead over the years.<br />
“Personally, I have been able to achieve results that ISTJs have<br />
not because <strong>of</strong> utilising a keen sense <strong>of</strong> being Intuitive versus<br />
Sensing. This means knowing instead <strong>of</strong> just Sensing. Knowing<br />
is more internal and Sensing is more external when it comes to<br />
decision-making. I have also found that knowing is much more<br />
accurate than Sensing or Feeling, which is more inaccurate<br />
based on an individual’s emotional state.”<br />
“<br />
Personally, I have been able to<br />
achieve results that ISTJs have<br />
not because <strong>of</strong> utilising a keen<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> being Intuitive versus<br />
Sensing.<br />
Shawn Eadens, Senior Management<br />
Consultant<br />
“Being an INTJ in an IT leadership position has been beneficial,” Senior Server Engineer and IT Architect John<br />
Perry told us. “This is due to the fact that we are pre-wired to create efficient organisations and systems just by<br />
our very nature.”<br />
Paul Aydelott, who has an IT career spanning 30 years and is owner <strong>of</strong> eZ Info Management, agreed his INTJ<br />
personality has been an “asset”. “I was one <strong>of</strong> four people - plus a host <strong>of</strong> contractors - selected to create a<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware development team for 3,000 <strong>of</strong>fices distributed across the US. Given that we and our agency were<br />
especially naive about the nature <strong>of</strong> the positions, I think my particular insights were invaluable for our survival.”<br />
10
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
Obviously, this testimonial evidence does not prove that INTJs make better IT leaders. Yet it does reveal an<br />
increased level <strong>of</strong> confidence from this group. Whilst CPP’s research also highlights a slightly higher volume <strong>of</strong><br />
INTJs (7.3%), if not overwhelmingly so, amongst the IT executive dataset.<br />
Do Perceptions Hold Introverts Back?<br />
“Many decisions are made in the world based on the appearance, exterior, or the personality <strong>of</strong> extroverts,”<br />
suggested Eadens. “In my experience, introverts have been highly productive and results-oriented but may need<br />
improvements in relationship building. I have been very successful in leadership roles over the last 30 years in<br />
Business, Ministry, and Sports, but have commonly been misunderstood due to erroneous perceptions that are<br />
accepted as social norms.”<br />
In my experience, introverts have been highly productive and results-oriented but may<br />
need improvements in relationship building.<br />
“Shawn Eadens, Senior Management Consultant<br />
<strong>The</strong> problem for many introverts may ultimately come down to the fact that they can be very private people. This<br />
is never going to be as easy for others to cope with as ‘an open book’. “If you do experience our feelings,” said<br />
Perry [in specific reference to his INTJ personality], “it is only because we have experienced something extremely<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ound or someone has really ticked us <strong>of</strong>f by being insanely stupid. We set our own internal standards and<br />
don’t need recognition for our egos.”<br />
“<strong>The</strong>re are many kinds <strong>of</strong> leadership,” suggested Aydelott, and ultimately it all comes down to balance. “Different<br />
approaches apply at different points in the lifecycle <strong>of</strong> an organisation. <strong>The</strong>re is no one personality style that<br />
works best, but a style that recognises and uses the best <strong>of</strong> all styles makes the best leader. Myers-Briggs does<br />
not define that flexing, robust style within the 16 types.”<br />
“I think the greatest misunderstanding is we try to over interpret those letters so it becomes stereotypical,”<br />
agreed Haynie. “My job is to educate HR pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who use this as a leadership or pr<strong>of</strong>essional development<br />
tool. You can’t know everything there is to know about a person based on those four letters. It is one part <strong>of</strong> who<br />
you are, it is the part you were born with, but there are so many things that are involved with developing your<br />
personality that the MBTI type is just one piece <strong>of</strong> the puzzle.”<br />
“ Cherie<br />
If you have a preference for INTJ, ISTJ, that is still just one part <strong>of</strong> your personality.<br />
We can learn and develop the skills we choose. That is who we are.<br />
Haynie, CPP<br />
Haynie feels this is why it can easily become dangerous: “It is not something that just anyone should get their<br />
hands on because they’re not understanding it correctly. For example, if an organisation was using Myers-Briggs<br />
for selection or recruitment we say it is absolutely unethical. <strong>The</strong>re are other tools for selection. But Myers-Briggs<br />
was only ever designed for development.”<br />
“If you have a preference for INTJ, ISTJ, that is still just one part <strong>of</strong> your personality,” she concluded. “We can<br />
learn and develop the skills we choose. That is who we are.”<br />
11
Introverts vs. Extroverts<br />
IDG Connect<br />
Is <strong>The</strong>re An IT Personality?<br />
If you mention any job - analyst, deep-sea diver, salesman, marketer, TV presenter - an image will instantly<br />
pop into your head, and to a limited extent, it will be correct. Yet once you dig beneath the surface <strong>of</strong> these<br />
individuals, you will find there is a lot more going on than the one-dimensional picture suggested by that job. In<br />
fact, it is worth remarking upon when someone is a totally typical version <strong>of</strong> their pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are many misconceptions about IT. One <strong>of</strong> the principal <strong>of</strong> these is that it is uncreative. “<strong>The</strong> popular myth<br />
<strong>of</strong> technology being inhabited by hyper-analytical geeks and badly dressed nerds is probably partially why the<br />
notion <strong>of</strong> technology being ‘non-creative’ has persisted,” suggested Stephen Bedford, CEO <strong>of</strong> cloud s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
company, Cognisec.<br />
<strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> IT work does mean, however, there is a clear, natural preference towards introversion amongst<br />
IT pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and a high volume who pr<strong>of</strong>ile as Myer-Briggs type ISTJ. Yet this is not as pronounced as many<br />
might assume. And most crucially this does not make all them all sad loners with no social skills.<br />
Introverts are simply more easily drained by external<br />
stimulation than others. This means they tend to prefer<br />
one-to-one meetings over large groups and usually favour<br />
focusing on one task at a time. Yet it is hardly surprising<br />
that some people choose these conditions – they are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
necessary for more detail-orientated or creative functions.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no typical IT personality,<br />
but there are different ways<br />
<strong>of</strong> working and engaging with “others.<br />
IDG Connect<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no typical IT personality, but there are different ways <strong>of</strong> working and engaging with others. And today, as<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> IT develops, IT leaders are increasingly required to move outside the narrow remit <strong>of</strong> IT in order to sell<br />
the benefits <strong>of</strong> their department into the wider business. This could prove a double-edged sword, but it is worth<br />
remembering that you don’t have to be extroverted to sell, although you may need to be introverted to spend 12<br />
hours doggedly pursuing one single detail-orientated development task.<br />
<strong>The</strong> very fact that IT is becoming so critical to all walks <strong>of</strong> life could provide a serious opportunity for individuals<br />
who can both master the technicalities <strong>of</strong> IT and communicate that information to the wider business. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
nothing to say any personality-type can do this less well – only that different aspects <strong>of</strong> the task will prove harder<br />
than others to each individual involved.<br />
About IDG Connect<br />
IDG Connect is the demand generation division <strong>of</strong> International Data Group (IDG), the world’s largest technology<br />
media company. Established in 2006, it utilises access to 38 million business decision makers’ details to unite<br />
technology marketers with relevant targets from 137 countries around the world. Committed to engaging a<br />
disparate global IT audience with truly localised messaging, IDG Connect also publishes market specific thought<br />
leadership papers on behalf <strong>of</strong> its clients, and produces research for B2B marketers worldwide.<br />
12
Page 134 <strong>of</strong> 160
Attachment C<br />
<strong>The</strong> Power <strong>of</strong> Introverts<br />
9 Best-Loved Stories<br />
Page 135 <strong>of</strong> 160
THE<br />
POWER<br />
OF<br />
INTROVERTS<br />
9 Best-Loved Stories<br />
by Susan Cain
CONTENTS PAGE<br />
Introduction 1<br />
Manifesto 2<br />
Quiz: Are You an Introvert or an Extrovert ? 4<br />
Are You Shy, Introverted, Both or Night (and Why Does It Matter) ? 7<br />
How to Overcome the Fear <strong>of</strong> ‘Putting Yourself Out <strong>The</strong>re’ 12<br />
When Does Socializing Make You Happier ? 18<br />
How Do Teachers Feel about <strong>The</strong>ir Quiet Students ? 24<br />
How to Parent Sensitive (Orchid) Children 28<br />
Public Speaking for Introverts 32<br />
How Your Personality Matures with Time 34<br />
Conclusion 37
INTRODUCTION<br />
Dear Friends,<br />
If you’ve seen my TED talk, you know that I had a grandfather, that my<br />
grandfather had an apartment, and that this apartment was my favorite<br />
place in the world when I was growing up — because it was filled with<br />
his gentle spirit and because it was filled with books.<br />
Of all those books, I remember the ones my grandfather loved best —<br />
the essay collections. He appreciated the discursive, personal,<br />
sustained exploration <strong>of</strong> a single idea. He especially loved a<br />
British essayist named G.K. Chesterton.<br />
“Oh, Chesterton!” he would exclaim. “Mamele (Yiddish for<br />
“ little mother” — one <strong>of</strong> his favorite terms <strong>of</strong> endearment),<br />
his essays are so wonderful, you have no idea.”<br />
I thought <strong>of</strong> my grandfather and his love <strong>of</strong> the essay as we put<br />
together this collection <strong>of</strong> blog posts for you. <strong>The</strong>y’re not worthy<br />
<strong>of</strong> Chesterton, <strong>of</strong> course, and they’re not exactly essays (though<br />
that’s a form I plan to experiment with in the months to come),<br />
but they ’re something close to that genre — each a limited yet<br />
directed exploration <strong>of</strong> a single idea.<br />
I hope you like them; I hope they enhance your life in some modest way;<br />
and I’d love to hear what you think.<br />
Thank you!<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 1
MANIFESTO<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
7.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re’s a word for “ people who are in their heads<br />
too much”: thinkers.<br />
Our culture rightly admires risk-takers, but we need<br />
our “heed-takers” more than ever.<br />
Solitude is a catalyst for innovation.<br />
Texting is popular because in an overly extroverted society,<br />
everyone craves asynchronous, non-F2F communication.<br />
We teach kids in group classrooms not because this is the<br />
best way to learn but because it’s cost-efficient, and what<br />
else would we do with the children while all the grown-ups<br />
are at work? If your child prefers to work autonomously<br />
and socialize one-on-one, there’s nothing wrong with her;<br />
she just happens not to fit the model.<br />
<strong>The</strong> next generation <strong>of</strong> quiet kids can and should be raised<br />
to know their own strengths.<br />
Sometimes it helps to be a pretend-extrovert.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re’s always time to be quiet later.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 2
8.<br />
9.<br />
10.<br />
11.<br />
12.<br />
13.<br />
14.<br />
15.<br />
16.<br />
But in the long run, staying true to your temperament is<br />
the key to finding work you love and work that matters.<br />
Everyone shines, given the right lighting. For some,<br />
it’s a Broadway spotlight; for others, a lamplit desk.<br />
Rule <strong>of</strong> thumb for networking events: one genuine new<br />
relationship is worth a fistful <strong>of</strong> business cards.<br />
It’s OK to cross the street to avoid making small talk.<br />
“Quiet leadership” is not an oxymoron.<br />
<strong>The</strong> universal longing for heaven is not about immortality<br />
so much as the wish for a world in which everyone is<br />
always kind.<br />
If the task <strong>of</strong> the first half <strong>of</strong> life is to put yourself out<br />
there, the task <strong>of</strong> the second half is to make sense <strong>of</strong><br />
where you’ve been.<br />
Love is essential, gregariousness is optional.<br />
“ In a gentle way, you can shake the world.” – Gandhi<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 3
QUIZ: ARE YOU<br />
AN INTROVERT OR<br />
AN EXTROVERT?<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
7.<br />
8.<br />
9.<br />
10.<br />
I prefer one-on-one conversations to group activities.<br />
I <strong>of</strong>ten prefer to express myself in writing.<br />
I enjoy solitude.<br />
I seem to care about wealth, fame, and status less<br />
than my peers.<br />
I dislike small talk, but I enjoy talking in-depth about topics<br />
that matter to me.<br />
People tell me that I’m a good listener.<br />
I’m not a big risk-taker.<br />
I enjoy work that allows me to “dive in” with few interruptions.<br />
I like to celebrate birthdays on a small scale, with only one or<br />
two close friends or family members.<br />
People describe me as “s<strong>of</strong>t-spoken” or “mellow.”<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 4
11.<br />
12.<br />
13.<br />
14.<br />
15.<br />
16.<br />
17.<br />
18.<br />
19.<br />
20.<br />
I prefer not to show or discuss my work with others<br />
until it’s finished.<br />
I dislike conflict.<br />
I do my best work on my own.<br />
I tend to think before I speak.<br />
I feel drained after being out and about, even if<br />
I’ve enjoyed myself.<br />
I <strong>of</strong>ten let calls go through to voice-mail.<br />
If I had to choose, I’d prefer a weekend with absolutely<br />
nothing to do to one with things too many scheduled.<br />
I don’t enjoy multi-tasking.<br />
I can concentrate easily.<br />
In classroom situations, I prefer lectures to seminars.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 5
<strong>The</strong> more <strong>of</strong>ten you answered True, the more introverted you<br />
probably are. Lots <strong>of</strong> Falses suggests you’re an extrovert. If you<br />
had a roughly equal number <strong>of</strong> Trues and Falses, then you may<br />
be an “ambivert” — yes, there really is such a word.<br />
Why does it matter where you fall on the introvert-extrovert<br />
spectrum? Because introversion and extroversion are at the<br />
heart <strong>of</strong> human nature —<br />
one scientist refers to them<br />
as “the north and south <strong>of</strong><br />
temperament.”<br />
And when you make life choices that are congruent with<br />
your temperament, you unleash vast stores <strong>of</strong> energy.<br />
Conversely, when you spend too much time battling your own<br />
nature, the opposite happens: you deplete yourself. I’ve met too<br />
many people living lives that didn’t suit them — introverts with<br />
frenetic social schedules and extroverts with jobs that required<br />
them to sit in front <strong>of</strong> their computers for hours at a stretch.<br />
We all have to do things that don’t come naturally... some <strong>of</strong><br />
the time. But it shouldn’t be all the time. It shouldn’t even be<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the time.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 6
ARE YOU SHY, INTROVERTED,<br />
BOTH, OR NEITHER<br />
(& WHY DOES IT MATTER)?<br />
Bill Gates is quiet and bookish, but apparently unfazed by<br />
others’ opinions <strong>of</strong> him: he’s an introvert, but not shy.<br />
Barbara Streisand has an outgoing, larger than life personality,<br />
who also battles with a paralyzing case <strong>of</strong> stage fright:<br />
she’s a shy extrovert.<br />
Shyness and introversion are not the same thing. Shyness is the<br />
fear <strong>of</strong> negative judgment, and introversion is a preference for<br />
quiet, minimally stimulating environments. Some psychologists<br />
map the two tendencies on vertical and horizontal axes, with<br />
the introvert-extrovert spectrum on the horizontal axis and the<br />
anxious-stable spectrum on the vertical.<br />
With this model, you end up with four quadrants <strong>of</strong> personality<br />
types: calm extroverts, anxious (or impulsive) extroverts, calm<br />
introverts, and anxious introverts.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 7
Interestingly, this view <strong>of</strong> human nature is echoed in ancient<br />
Greece. <strong>The</strong> physicians Hippocrates and Galen famously<br />
proposed that our temperaments — and destinies — were a<br />
function <strong>of</strong> bodily fluids. Extra blood made people sanguine<br />
(calmly extroverted), yellow bile made them choleric<br />
(impulsively extroverted), phlegm made them phlegmatic<br />
(calmly introverted), and black bile made them melancholic<br />
(anxiously introverted).<br />
But if shyness and introversion<br />
are so different, why do we<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten link them, especially in<br />
the popular media?<br />
<strong>The</strong> most important answer is that there’s a shared bias in our<br />
society against both traits. <strong>The</strong> mental state <strong>of</strong> a shy extrovert<br />
sitting quietly in a business meeting may be very different<br />
from that <strong>of</strong> a calm introvert — the shy person is afraid to<br />
speak up, while the introvert is simply overstimulated —<br />
but to the outside world, the two appear to be the same, and<br />
neither type is welcome. Studies show that we rank fast and<br />
frequent talkers as more competent, likable, and even smarter<br />
than slow ones.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 8
Galen aside, poets and philosophers throughout history,<br />
like John Milton and Arthur Schopenhauer, have associated<br />
shyness with introversion. As the anthropologist<br />
C.A. Valentine once wrote,<br />
“ Western cultural traditions include a conception <strong>of</strong><br />
individual variability which appears to be old, widespread,<br />
and persistent. In popular form this is the familiar notion <strong>of</strong><br />
the man <strong>of</strong> action, practical man, realist, or sociable person<br />
as opposed to the thinker, dreamer, idealist, or shy individual.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most widely used labels associated with this tradition are<br />
the type designations extrovert and introvert.”<br />
Were these sages flat out wrong? No. Psychologists have found<br />
that shyness and introversion do overlap (meaning that many<br />
shy people are introverted, and vice versa), though they debate<br />
to what degree. <strong>The</strong>re are several reasons for this overlap. For one<br />
thing, some people are born with “high-reactive” temperaments<br />
that predispose them to both shyness and introversion. Also,<br />
a shy person may become more introverted over time; since<br />
social life is painful, she is motivated to discover the pleasures<br />
<strong>of</strong> solitude and other minimally social environments. And an<br />
introvert may become shy after continually receiving the<br />
message that there’s something wrong with him.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 9
But shyness and introversion don’t overlap completely, or<br />
even predominantly. Some time ago, I published an op-ed in<br />
<strong>The</strong> New York Times on the value <strong>of</strong> these two characteristics.<br />
It touched a chord in a readership hungry for this message, and<br />
I received over a thousand heartfelt notes <strong>of</strong> thanks.<br />
But some letter writers felt that the article conflated<br />
introversion with shyness and, as such, had misrepresented<br />
them. Though I did make a clear distinction in the piece<br />
between the two, these writers were correct that I moved<br />
on quickly, perhaps too quickly, to other subjects. I did this<br />
because <strong>of</strong> space constraints — if I had tried to explain<br />
everything I just outlined above (and even this post only<br />
scratches the surface <strong>of</strong> a highly complex topic), I would<br />
never have gotten to the real point: the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
shyness and introversion in a society that disdains them.<br />
Still, I understand why non-anxious introverts feel frustrated<br />
when people treat them as if they’re shy. It’s inherently<br />
annoying to be misunderstood, to be told that you’re something<br />
that you’re not. Anyone who has walked down the street deep<br />
in thought and been instructed by a stranger to smile — as if<br />
he were depressed, rather than mentally engaged — knows<br />
how maddening this is.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 10
Also, shyness implies submissiveness. And in a competitive<br />
culture that reveres alpha dogs, one-downmanship is probably<br />
the most damning trait <strong>of</strong> all.<br />
Yet this is where the shy and the introverted, for all their<br />
differences, have something pr<strong>of</strong>ound in common. Neither type<br />
is perceived by society as alpha, and this gives both types the<br />
vision to see how alpha status is overrated and how our reverence<br />
for it blinds us to things that are good, smart, and wise.<br />
For very different reasons, shy and introverted people might<br />
choose to spend their days in behind-the-scenes or “passive”<br />
pursuits like inventing, studying, or holding the hands <strong>of</strong> the dying.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are not alpha roles, but the people who play them are role<br />
models all the same.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 11
HOW TO OVERCOME THE<br />
FEAR OF ‘PUTTING YOURSELF<br />
OUT THERE’.<br />
In researching my book, QUIET: <strong>The</strong> Power <strong>of</strong> Introverts in a World<br />
That Can’t Stop Talking, I met a scientist performing groundbreaking<br />
work on social anxiety disorder. A charming, articulate man, he confided<br />
to me that his interest in the field came from his own struggles with<br />
shyness. But he asked me not to use his name in my book. “Not everyone<br />
is as comfortable as you are exposing their true feelings,” he said.<br />
“To which I could only say ha”<br />
I am not a natural self-discloser at all. It took me 30 years to realize my<br />
childhood dream <strong>of</strong> becoming a writer, partly because I was afraid to<br />
write about personal things — yet these were the subjects I was drawn to.<br />
Eventually, my drive to write grew stronger than my fear, and I’ve never<br />
looked back. I still envy friends who write about topics like science or<br />
politics. <strong>The</strong>y can show up at dinner parties without everyone<br />
announcing: “Here comes the introvert!”<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 12
But you get used to it. And really, it’s a small price to pay<br />
for the freedom to say what you think.<br />
I tell you all this because I hear <strong>of</strong>ten from people who<br />
burst with ideas but decline to share them because they<br />
dislike the spotlight. Maybe you fear others judging you<br />
and your work. Or you’re uncomfortable with self -promotion.<br />
Or perhaps you’re afraid <strong>of</strong> failure, or <strong>of</strong> success.<br />
So many fears, so many ideas worth sharing. What to do?<br />
Here are seven ideas to help you power through these<br />
disabling emotions.<br />
1. Know that you’re in good company.<br />
People have always had to put themselves out there. We tend to<br />
think that in the good old days, no one had to self-promote the<br />
way we do today. True — but if they wanted to share, or lead,<br />
or create, they had to go public with their thoughts too.<br />
And this has always been scary. Darwin waited THIRTY-FOUR<br />
years to publish his idea that humans evolved from monkeys.<br />
Scholars call this “Darwin’s Delay,” and many believe it was<br />
due to his fear that others would judge his heretical theory.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 13
2. When it comes to social media,<br />
think self-expression, not self-promotion.<br />
Blogging and tweeting, if practiced properly, feel more like a<br />
creative project than an exercise in self-disclosure even though,<br />
<strong>of</strong> course, they are both. <strong>The</strong>y also don’t require the in-person<br />
social multitasking that many people find so exhausting.<br />
3. C<strong>of</strong>fee will deliver you from self-doubt.<br />
It gets you excited about new ideas and helps you ignore the<br />
chorus <strong>of</strong> judgers inside your head. It propels your thinking and<br />
helps you make connections between seemingly unrelated things.<br />
Hence, the saying that “a mathematician is a device for turning<br />
c<strong>of</strong>fee into theorems.”<br />
4. Train yourself to associate idea<br />
generation with pleasure.<br />
I usually work at a cozy café table and indulge in a chocolate<br />
muffin. I would probably be five pounds lighter without this<br />
habit, but I don’t care. By now, I so associate writing and idea<br />
generation with pleasure that I love it even when I don’t have<br />
a café table handy.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 14
5. Work alone (or “alone together”—<br />
for example, sitting by yourself in a c<strong>of</strong>fee<br />
shop or library).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re’s a lot <strong>of</strong> nonsense floating around these days about<br />
how creativity is a fundamentally social act. Ignore this.<br />
Yes, creativity is social in the sense that we all stand on the<br />
shoulders <strong>of</strong> those who came before us; yes, we must share and<br />
advance ideas (that’s the whole point <strong>of</strong> this article); and yes,<br />
collaboration is a powerful and beautiful thing (think Lennon<br />
and McCartney, or the Madonna and child).<br />
But for many people, the creative thinking process is a solo act.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> my all- time favorite quotes comes from William Whyte’s<br />
<strong>The</strong> Organization Man:<br />
“ <strong>The</strong> most misguided attempt at false collectivization is<br />
the current attempt to see the group as a creative vehicle…<br />
People very rarely think in groups; they talk together, they<br />
exchange information, they adjudicate, they make<br />
compromises. But they do not think; they do not create.”<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 15
6. Work at night when your cortisol levels are lower.<br />
When I was a child at summer camp, I noticed a strange pattern.<br />
I was horribly homesick first thing in the morning, <strong>of</strong>ten waking<br />
up with a stomach ache. But as the day wore on, the homesickness<br />
faded. By nighttime, I was carefree and having a grand time.<br />
Each night, I was sure I’d wake up the next morning<br />
feeling just as strong. But the homesickness always came<br />
back. Back then, I couldn’t explain this pattern, but I<br />
can now. Cortisol is a stress hormone, and it peaks<br />
in the morning and steadily dissipates through out<br />
the day. For some <strong>of</strong> us, these peaks and falls are<br />
especially pronounced.<br />
So while you probably think most clearly first<br />
thing in the morning, you may be at your least<br />
inhibited at night. I’ve noticed that interesting<br />
turns <strong>of</strong> phrase and associative leaps come to<br />
me much more easily in the evening hours. Indeed,<br />
creativity researchers believe that a relaxed brain,<br />
a brain that is not in the grip <strong>of</strong> anxiety or blocked by<br />
other psychological barriers, is a more creative brain.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 16
7. Strengthen your backbone<br />
and, therefore, your confidence<br />
in small steps.<br />
Get in the habit <strong>of</strong> asking yourself where<br />
you stand on various questions. When you<br />
have firm opinions or a strong sense <strong>of</strong><br />
right or wrong on a given question, savor<br />
the feeling. It doesn’t matter what kind<br />
<strong>of</strong> question — it can be how to organize<br />
the dishwasher.<br />
<strong>The</strong> point is to get used to the feeling<br />
<strong>of</strong> having a center and operating from it.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n, produce more consequential<br />
ideas from this same place. You’ll still<br />
have doubts, <strong>of</strong> course: “Does it make<br />
sense? Will people agree ?” That’s normal.<br />
But you need to have confidence about<br />
the underlying purpose <strong>of</strong> your undertaking.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 17
WHEN DOES SOCIALIZING<br />
MAKE YOU HAPPIER?<br />
You’re standing at the checkout line at the grocery store,<br />
pondering tomorrow’s to-do list. <strong>The</strong> cashier greets you with<br />
a grin. You’re not in the mood to chit-chat, but out <strong>of</strong> politeness<br />
you do anyway — and feel curiously happy afterwards.<br />
A big smile plays across your face as you leave the store.<br />
What just happened?<br />
A famous study answers this question. Researcher William<br />
Fleeson and his colleagues tracked a group <strong>of</strong> people, every<br />
three hours for two weeks, recording how they ’d been acting<br />
and feeling during each chunk <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>The</strong>y found that those<br />
who’d acted “ talkative ” and “assertive” — even if they were<br />
introverts — were more likely to report feeling positive<br />
emotions such as excitement and enthusiasm.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 18
EVERYONE FEELS HAPPIER<br />
WHEN THEY SOCIALIZE,<br />
CONCLUDED<br />
THE RESEARCHERS —<br />
INTROVERTS INCLUDED.<br />
So should introverts force themselves to attend parties even<br />
when they’d rather stay home and read? That’s what people<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten take these findings to mean.<br />
But this is too glib an interpretation.<br />
Here’s why.<br />
Sure, socializing makes us feel good. Sometimes it’s worth it<br />
to push ourselves. We’re all social animals; on some level,<br />
love really is all you need.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 19
But if the spike <strong>of</strong> happiness introverts<br />
get following that nice exchange with the<br />
grocery clerk is real, so are the feelings <strong>of</strong><br />
exhaustion and over-stimulation that<br />
come with too much socializing.<br />
Tolerance for stimulation is one <strong>of</strong> the biggest differences<br />
between introverts and extroverts. Extroverts simply need more<br />
stimulation — social and otherwise — than introverts do. Research<br />
suggests that acting falsely extroverted can lead to stress, burnout,<br />
and cardiovascular disease.<br />
All <strong>of</strong> this seems to leave introverts in a tight spot: socializing<br />
makes us happy — but also over-stimulated and even anxious.<br />
This inner conflict sounds like a huge pain — a reason to curse<br />
the gods for having made you an introvert.<br />
But it can also be a great gift.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 20
Many introverts find ways to spend<br />
their time that are deeply fulfilling —<br />
and socially connected —<br />
but where there is no conflict.<br />
Here are five <strong>of</strong> these ways:<br />
1. Read: Marcel Proust once said that reading is “that fruitful<br />
miracle <strong>of</strong> a communication in the midst <strong>of</strong> solitude.” Books<br />
transcend time and place. <strong>The</strong>y don’t even require reader and<br />
writer to be alive at the same time. Studies also suggest that<br />
reading fiction increases empathy and social skills.<br />
2. Enter a state <strong>of</strong> “flow” by doing work or a hobby that<br />
you love. Flow is the transcendent state <strong>of</strong> being, identified by<br />
influential psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. You’re in flow<br />
when you feel totally engaged in an activity — whether longdistance<br />
swimming, song-writing, or ocean sailing. In a state <strong>of</strong><br />
flow, you’re neither bored nor anxious, and you don’t question<br />
your own adequacy. Hours pass without your noticing. In flow,<br />
says Csikszentmihalyi, “a person could work around the clock<br />
for days on end, for no better reason than to keep on working.”<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 21
Flow is my five-year old playing with his Lego set, sometimes<br />
accompanied by his best friend, sometimes not — time seems<br />
to float by as he lies contentedly on his stomach, watching<br />
the wheels go ‘round. Flow is my 84- year-old father,<br />
a former medical school pr<strong>of</strong>essor, sitting at his desk<br />
for hours reading medical journals.<br />
When I was a kid and saw my father come home<br />
from a long day at work only to crack open those<br />
forbidding - looking papers, I worried that he<br />
worked too hard. Now I know that he was<br />
spending time the way he loved.<br />
People in flow don’t tend to wear the broad<br />
smiles <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm that Fleeson’s research<br />
focused on. When you watch them in action,<br />
the words “joy ” and “excitement” don’t come to<br />
mind. But the words “engagement,” “absorption,”<br />
and “curiosity ” do.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 22
3. Keep an informal quota system <strong>of</strong> how many times per<br />
week/month/ year you plan to go out to social events —<br />
and how <strong>of</strong>ten you get to stay home. This way, you don’t feel<br />
guilty about declining those party invitations. When you do go<br />
out, hopefully you’ll have a good time and make a new friend you<br />
wouldn’t have met in your lamplit living room. <strong>The</strong> right party<br />
can be a delicious experience. But when you don’t enjoy yourself,<br />
you’re less likely to drive yourself crazy thinking you should’ve<br />
stayed in. Your night was what it was, and that’s fine.<br />
4. Have meaningful conversations. Pleasant chit-chat with the<br />
grocery clerk notwithstanding, research suggests that the happiest<br />
people have twice as many substantive conversations, and engage<br />
in much less small talk, than the unhappiest. (<strong>The</strong> researchers<br />
were surprised by their findings, but if you’re an introvert,<br />
you’re probably not!)<br />
5. Shower time and affection on people you know and love<br />
— people whose company is so dear and comfortable that you<br />
feel neither over-stimulated nor anxious in their presence. If you<br />
don’t cast your social net too wide, you’re more likely to cast it<br />
deep — which your friends and family will appreciate.<br />
Yes, love is all you need. But love takes many forms.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 23
HOW DO TEACHERS FEEL<br />
ABOUT THEIR<br />
QUIET STUDENTS?<br />
Did you catch the news story about Natalie Munro, the high school<br />
English teacher from Pennsylvania who blogged her true feelings about<br />
her students? Apparently failing to comprehend the public nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Internet, she mused about the nasty things she wished she could write<br />
on her students’ report cards.<br />
It was an abuse <strong>of</strong> trust and a blinkered use <strong>of</strong> the blogging medium.<br />
But that’s not what I want to focus on; others have already covered<br />
that very effectively.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 24
I want to talk about<br />
Munro’s view <strong>of</strong> quiet and shy<br />
students. Here, according to one <strong>of</strong> her<br />
blog entries (since removed), is what she<br />
wished she could put on their report cards:<br />
“A kid that has no personality.”<br />
“She just sits there emotionless for an entire<br />
90 minutes, staring into the abyss, never<br />
volunteering to speak or do anything.”<br />
“Shy isn’t cute in 11th grade; it’s annoying.<br />
Must learn to advocate for himself instead<br />
<strong>of</strong> having Mommy do it.”<br />
Munro seemed to have no understanding <strong>of</strong> how poor a fit the<br />
typical American high school can be for introverts — like an<br />
all-day cocktail party without any alcohol. She believed that these<br />
kids should suck it up and act like everyone else. And she was right,<br />
to a certain extent; we all need to fake it a little, extroverts too.<br />
I’ve met many introverted kids who are thriving and happy, and most<br />
<strong>of</strong> them have learned how to adopt an extroverted persona when need be.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 25
But consider this question:<br />
Why do so many high-functioning people look back at<br />
high school as the worst time <strong>of</strong> their lives — and why<br />
do we accept this as normal?<br />
As adults, we (hopefully) get to choose the careers, spouses,<br />
and social circles that suit us. Bill Gates and Bill Clinton<br />
thrive in very different work environments. But for<br />
schoolchildren, it’s one size fits all — and the size on <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
is usually extra-extroverted.<br />
One saving grace are the teachers who understand this —<br />
the teachers who connect with the kid in the back row<br />
thinking amazing thoughts that he’s uncomfortable sharing<br />
aloud with 25 classmates. I’ve spent a lot <strong>of</strong> time touring<br />
schools and observing classrooms, and I’ve met some great and<br />
sensitive teachers along the way. If you read through Munro’s<br />
blog, she’s clearly a Piece <strong>of</strong> Work — not representative <strong>of</strong> your<br />
typical teacher.<br />
I also know how hard it is for teachers when students<br />
are reluctant to participate in class. Once I taught two<br />
back-to-back negotiation seminars — a Wednesday night<br />
class and a Thursday night class. <strong>The</strong> Wednesday night class<br />
discussions were always lively and animated. But in the Thursday<br />
night class, the participants stared at me as if I had two heads<br />
and wanted me to do all the talking.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 26
This made my job so much harder and — on a<br />
day- to-day basis — less fulfilling. Some <strong>of</strong> those<br />
students wrote me letters when the class was<br />
done, expressing how deeply they’d enjoyed it.<br />
I was surprised each and every time;<br />
I’d assumed they hadn’t liked the class at all.<br />
So I have tremendous respect for teachers<br />
who work gracefully with their “ Thursday<br />
night” students.<br />
But I’m afraid that they are the exceptions;<br />
research suggests that the majority <strong>of</strong> our<br />
teachers believe that the “ ideal student”<br />
is an extrovert. Which is extraordinary, when<br />
you consider how many <strong>of</strong> our greatest thinkers<br />
were introverts. Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein,<br />
George Orwell, Steven Spielberg, Larry Page,<br />
J.K. Rowling: none <strong>of</strong> them would have made<br />
“ ideal students.”<br />
If I had one wish, it would be to reverse the stigma<br />
against introversion for children so that the next<br />
generation doesn’t grow up with the secret self-loathing<br />
that plagues so many introverted grown-ups today.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 27
HOW TO PARENT SENSITIVE<br />
(ORCHID) CHILDREN<br />
Not that long ago, I fervently recommended<br />
this groundbreaking Atlantic magazine article, in which<br />
author David Dobbs explains a bold new theory <strong>of</strong> genetics —<br />
that “most <strong>of</strong> us have genes that make us as hardy as<br />
dandelions: able to take root and survive almost anywhere.<br />
A few <strong>of</strong> us, however, are more like the orchid: fragile and<br />
fickle, but capable <strong>of</strong> blooming spectacularly if given<br />
greenhouse care.” Many introverted children appear to<br />
have orchid genes.<br />
In response to the article, one thoughtful reader<br />
asked this question:<br />
“How do we as sensitive people raise children who<br />
are sensitive to become orchids, without becoming<br />
hypervigilant about controlling every experience they<br />
encounter to ensure they are getting the love and<br />
support they need ? I could see it leading to perfectionism<br />
and harsh self judgement with regard to parenting skills.”<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 28
For those who missed it, Dobbs (author <strong>of</strong> the original article)<br />
posted his own answer to the question.<br />
Here it is:<br />
“<strong>The</strong> data supporting the idea that more sensitive,<br />
“ vulnerable” people do worse than others do in bad<br />
conditions but *better* in good conditions is based mainly<br />
on studies <strong>of</strong> adverse conditions — and show repeatedly<br />
that the mere LACK <strong>of</strong> bad, really trying conditions is<br />
enough to let orchids fare better than others do.<br />
In other words, they tend to thrive under even ‘pretty good’<br />
conditions, and don’t require extraordinary care;<br />
you needn’t build the best, most carefully climatecontrolled<br />
greenhouse ever made; a safe but stimulating<br />
environment will likely serve splendidly.<br />
For parenting, this means doing the right thing most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the time, not all the time, and providing a good<br />
environment, not necessarily a great one, to make the<br />
most <strong>of</strong> a child’s high responsiveness to experience.<br />
If that’s the case, then super-parenting isn’t needed.<br />
Bettelheim’s “good enough parenting” will do just fine.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 29
I would add, regarding how to parent sensitive children,<br />
that if you’ve guarded against the most harsh experiences<br />
that can affect a child, it probably makes more sense to<br />
focus on providing lots <strong>of</strong> small, positive things than on<br />
being hypervigilant about protecting the child from<br />
every bump, insult, or troubling challenge. And anxious<br />
hypervigilance sends a message that the world is<br />
perhaps too dangerous to handle.<br />
Small expressions <strong>of</strong> support and confidence and<br />
reassurance send the message that though the world<br />
can bring trouble, we’re almost always up for it, and will<br />
recover from all but — and sometimes even those too —<br />
the most serious setbacks or injuries or insults. I think the<br />
psychotherapeutic notion <strong>of</strong> ‘mirroring’ is handy to think <strong>of</strong><br />
here. It’s the idea <strong>of</strong> reflecting to the child an attitude about<br />
how the world works. (It has another meaning too, reflecting<br />
an image <strong>of</strong> the child, but I’m concerned with this other.)<br />
What’s good mirroring? Best example <strong>of</strong>fered to me<br />
was, Your house burns down. All is lost, but no one hurt.<br />
Your stuff’s gone. You’re out sitting on the curb with<br />
the family watching the firefighters douse the last <strong>of</strong><br />
the steaming rubble. And instead <strong>of</strong> freaking out,<br />
You put your arm around the kid and say, ‘It’s okay.’<br />
Because it will [be].”<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 30
I love this advice. But I want to answer one more question you<br />
might be wondering about: What if your child is subject to<br />
harsh, really harsh, experiences outside your control?<br />
I asked this question <strong>of</strong> Jay Belsky, a leading proponent <strong>of</strong><br />
orchid theory, a psychology pr<strong>of</strong>essor, and child care expert at<br />
the University <strong>of</strong> London. Using divorce as an example, he told<br />
me that even orchid children can withstand some adversity if<br />
it’s managed properly. Orchid kids will be disrupted more than<br />
others by divorce, he told me. “If the parents squabble a lot,<br />
and put their kid in the middle, then watch out — this is the<br />
kid who will succumb.” But if the divorcing parents get along,<br />
if they provide their child with the other psychological<br />
nutrients he needs, then even an orchid child can do just fine.<br />
Indeed, the parents <strong>of</strong> high-reactive children are very lucky,<br />
Belsky told me. “<strong>The</strong> time and effort they invest will actually<br />
make a difference. Instead <strong>of</strong> seeing these kids as vulnerable to<br />
adversity, parents should see them as malleable — for worse,<br />
but also for better.”<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 31
PUBLIC SPEAKING<br />
FOR INTROVERTS<br />
I have a really complicated relationship<br />
to public speaking. <strong>The</strong> mere prospect<br />
<strong>of</strong> giving a lecture used to make me want<br />
to throw up. Literally. Once during law<br />
school, I got so nervous that I had to<br />
bolt for the restroom on the way to<br />
class. (I can’t believe I’m admitting<br />
this to the entire blogosphere.)<br />
But I’ve come a long way since<br />
then. <strong>The</strong>se days, much to my<br />
own astonishment, I have a career<br />
as a pr<strong>of</strong>essional public speaker!<br />
It took me a while to get there.<br />
When I first started, I struggled<br />
a lot with following question:<br />
If public speaking requires brio<br />
and dynamism, and if I am naturally<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t-spoken, then how can I be an<br />
effective speaker — and still be<br />
my authentic self ?<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 32
So I tried to look for examples <strong>of</strong> low-key yet masterful speakers —<br />
and found the author Malcolm Gladwell. He dazzles sold-out crowds<br />
<strong>of</strong> London theatregoers, but if you watch him in action, for example<br />
here, he’s clearly an introvert, with a very calm and cerebral style.<br />
So I think he’s a great role model for people like me.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n I came across this fascinating interview with Gladwell.<br />
“Speaking is not an act <strong>of</strong> extroversion,” he says. “People think it is.<br />
It has nothing to do with extroversion. It’s a performance, and many<br />
performers are hugely introverted.”<br />
He goes on to say that when he speaks, he’s simply inhabiting a role,<br />
“a storytelling role that I don’t inhabit when I’m not on the stage.<br />
I’m not the chatty one at the dinner table or at parties. I don’t actually<br />
go to that many parties.”<br />
Gladwell is also known to prepare every single word <strong>of</strong> his talk<br />
beforehand — every single word — even though they appear<br />
spontaneous. I think this is liberating — that it’s okay to pretend a little<br />
when you’re on stage. Who cares if you’re not a natural storyteller ?<br />
You can craft your stories beforehand, practice them, and share them —<br />
for the brief moment that the spotlight is on you. <strong>The</strong>n you can step <strong>of</strong>f<br />
stage and go right back to being yourself.<br />
But in the meantime, you had the chance to change a whole audience<br />
full <strong>of</strong> hearts and minds. And there’s nothing more authentic than that.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 33
HOW YOUR PERSONALITY<br />
MATURES WITH TIME<br />
Readers <strong>of</strong>ten ask me:<br />
“Is it possible for my personality to change over time?<br />
I seem to be getting more introverted as I get older.”<br />
I’ve asked myself the same question. I was always an introvert,<br />
but my social needs used to be much more intense than they<br />
are today. When I was in high school, I talked on the phone<br />
five hours a night. In college, I thought briefly <strong>of</strong> becoming a<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essor but decided I couldn’t handle the amount <strong>of</strong> solitary<br />
time researching and writing would require. Today, in contrast,<br />
I’m horrible at returning friends’ phone calls because I dislike<br />
talking on the phone, and researching and writing are among<br />
my favorite activities.<br />
On the extroverted side <strong>of</strong> the equation, we have my husband<br />
as Exhibit A. In many ways he is very, very extroverted. For<br />
example, I hardly ever address him by his real name. Instead I<br />
call him Gonzo, the nickname I gave him years ago in honor <strong>of</strong><br />
the journalist Hunter S. Thompson’s “gonzo” style <strong>of</strong> throwing<br />
himself into the stories he reported on.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 34
My Gonzo is the same way — he throws himself with great<br />
passion and charisma into just about everything he does,<br />
including parenting and husbanding. It’s impossible for<br />
Gonzo to be in the room without feeling the warmth <strong>of</strong><br />
his presence. And I gather that when he was a very<br />
young man, he threw himself into his social life with<br />
similar energy. Today Gonzo is still the same person —<br />
no one would ever call him an introvert — but<br />
his attentions are directed in a decidedly more<br />
interior direction.<br />
But all <strong>of</strong> this is anecdotal. According to<br />
research psychology, the answer to the<br />
question <strong>of</strong> whether personalities change<br />
over time is no, and yes.<br />
Studies show that the personality <strong>of</strong> a 70-yearold<br />
can be predicted with remarkable accuracy<br />
from early adulthood on. Despite the variety <strong>of</strong><br />
situations that we experience in a lifetime — all <strong>of</strong><br />
them influencing who we are and how we grow —<br />
our core traits tend to remain constant. It’s not that<br />
our personalities don’t evolve — for example, many<br />
introverts report feeling more socially confident and<br />
graceful as they mature — but we tend to stick to<br />
predictable patterns.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 35
If you were the tenth most introverted person in your high school<br />
class, your behavior may fluctuate over time, but you’ll probably<br />
still find yourself ranked around tenth at your fiftieth reunion.<br />
But, at that class reunion, you’ll also notice that many <strong>of</strong> your<br />
classmates will be more introverted than you remember them<br />
in high school: quieter, more self-contained, less in need <strong>of</strong><br />
excitement. <strong>The</strong>y will also more emotionally stable, agreeable, and<br />
conscientious. All <strong>of</strong> these traits grow more pronounced with age,<br />
as if personalities are a kind <strong>of</strong> fine wine that mellows with age.<br />
Psychologists call this process “intrinsic maturation,” and they’ve<br />
found these same patterns <strong>of</strong> personality development in countries<br />
as diverse as Germany, the UK, Spain, the Czech Republic, and Turkey.<br />
Also in chimps and monkeys.<br />
This makes evolutionary sense. High levels <strong>of</strong> extroversion probably<br />
help with mating, which is why most <strong>of</strong> us are at our most sociable<br />
during our teenage and young adult years. But when it comes to keeping<br />
marriages stable and raising children, having a restless desire to hit<br />
every party in town may be less useful than the urge to stay home and<br />
love the one you’re with. Also, a certain degree <strong>of</strong> introspection may<br />
help us age with equanimity. If the task <strong>of</strong> the first half <strong>of</strong> life is to<br />
put yourself out there, the task <strong>of</strong> the second half is to make sense<br />
<strong>of</strong> where you’ve been.<br />
THE POWER OF INTROVERTS | 36
THANKS SO MUCH<br />
FOR READING THIS<br />
COLLECTION!<br />
For more from Susan Cain<br />
and the Quiet Revolution,<br />
visit QuietRev.com
Page 136 <strong>of</strong> 160
Advocacy Foundation Publishers<br />
Page 137 <strong>of</strong> 160
Advocacy Foundation Publishers<br />
<strong>The</strong> e-Advocate Quarterly<br />
Page 138 <strong>of</strong> 160
Issue Title Quarterly<br />
Vol. I 2015 <strong>The</strong> Fundamentals<br />
I<br />
<strong>The</strong> ComeUnity ReEngineering<br />
Project Initiative<br />
Q-1 2015<br />
II <strong>The</strong> Adolescent Law Group Q-2 2015<br />
III<br />
Landmark Cases in US<br />
Juvenile Justice (PA)<br />
Q-3 2015<br />
IV <strong>The</strong> First Amendment Project Q-4 2015<br />
Vol. II 2016 Strategic Development<br />
V <strong>The</strong> Fourth Amendment Project Q-1 2016<br />
VI<br />
Landmark Cases in US<br />
Juvenile Justice (NJ)<br />
Q-2 2016<br />
VII Youth Court Q-3 2016<br />
VIII<br />
<strong>The</strong> Economic Consequences <strong>of</strong> Legal<br />
Decision-Making<br />
Q-4 2016<br />
Vol. III 2017 Sustainability<br />
IX <strong>The</strong> Sixth Amendment Project Q-1 2017<br />
X<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ological Foundations <strong>of</strong><br />
US Law & Government<br />
Q-2 2017<br />
XI <strong>The</strong> Eighth Amendment Project Q-3 2017<br />
XII<br />
<strong>The</strong> EB-5 Investor<br />
Immigration Project*<br />
Q-4 2017<br />
Vol. IV 2018 Collaboration<br />
XIII Strategic Planning Q-1 2018<br />
XIV<br />
<strong>The</strong> Juvenile Justice<br />
Legislative Reform Initiative<br />
Q-2 2018<br />
XV <strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation Coalition Q-3 2018<br />
Page 139 <strong>of</strong> 160
XVI<br />
for Drug-Free Communities<br />
Landmark Cases in US<br />
Juvenile Justice (GA)<br />
Q-4 2018<br />
Page 140 <strong>of</strong> 160
Issue Title Quarterly<br />
Vol. V 2019 Organizational Development<br />
XVII <strong>The</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors Q-1 2019<br />
XVIII <strong>The</strong> Inner Circle Q-2 2019<br />
XIX Staff & Management Q-3 2019<br />
XX Succession Planning Q-4 2019<br />
XXI <strong>The</strong> Budget* Bonus #1<br />
XXII Data-Driven Resource Allocation* Bonus #2<br />
Vol. VI 2020 Missions<br />
XXIII Critical Thinking Q-1 2020<br />
XXIV<br />
<strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation<br />
Endowments Initiative Project<br />
Q-2 2020<br />
XXV International Labor Relations Q-3 2020<br />
XXVI Immigration Q-4 2020<br />
Vol. VII 2021 Community Engagement<br />
XXVII<br />
<strong>The</strong> 21 st Century Charter Schools<br />
Initiative<br />
Q-1 2021<br />
XXVIII <strong>The</strong> All-Sports Ministry @ ... Q-2 2021<br />
XXIX Lobbying for Nonpr<strong>of</strong>its Q-3 2021<br />
XXX<br />
XXXI<br />
Advocacy Foundation Missions -<br />
Domestic<br />
Advocacy Foundation Missions -<br />
International<br />
Q-4 2021<br />
Bonus<br />
Page 141 <strong>of</strong> 160
Vol. VIII<br />
2022 ComeUnity ReEngineering<br />
XXXII<br />
<strong>The</strong> Creative & Fine Arts Ministry<br />
@ <strong>The</strong> Foundation<br />
Q-1 2022<br />
XXXIII <strong>The</strong> Advisory Council & Committees Q-2 2022<br />
XXXIV<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ological Origins<br />
<strong>of</strong> Contemporary Judicial Process<br />
Q-3 2022<br />
XXXV <strong>The</strong> Second Chance Ministry @ ... Q-4 2022<br />
Vol. IX 2023 Legal Reformation<br />
XXXVI <strong>The</strong> Fifth Amendment Project Q-1 2023<br />
XXXVII <strong>The</strong> Judicial Re-Engineering Initiative Q-2 2023<br />
XXXVIII<br />
<strong>The</strong> Inner-Cities Strategic<br />
Revitalization Initiative<br />
Q-3 2023<br />
XXXVIX Habeas Corpus Q-4 2023<br />
Vol. X 2024 ComeUnity Development<br />
XXXVX<br />
<strong>The</strong> Inner-City Strategic<br />
Revitalization Plan<br />
Q-1 2024<br />
XXXVXI <strong>The</strong> Mentoring Initiative Q-2 2024<br />
XXXVXII <strong>The</strong> Violence Prevention Framework Q-3 2024<br />
XXXVXIII <strong>The</strong> Fatherhood Initiative Q-4 2024<br />
Vol. XI 2025 Public Interest<br />
XXXVXIV Public Interest Law Q-1 2025<br />
L (50) Spiritual Resource Development Q-2 2025<br />
Page 142 <strong>of</strong> 160
LI<br />
Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it Confidentiality<br />
In <strong>The</strong> Age <strong>of</strong> Big Data<br />
Q-3 2025<br />
LII Interpreting <strong>The</strong> Facts Q-4 2025<br />
Vol. XII 2026 Poverty In America<br />
LIII<br />
American Poverty<br />
In <strong>The</strong> New Millennium<br />
Q-1 2026<br />
LIV Outcome-Based Thinking Q-2 2026<br />
LV Transformational Social Leadership Q-3 2026<br />
LVI <strong>The</strong> Cycle <strong>of</strong> Poverty Q-4 2026<br />
Vol. XIII 2027 Raising Awareness<br />
LVII ReEngineering Juvenile Justice Q-1 2027<br />
LVIII Corporations Q-2 2027<br />
LVIX <strong>The</strong> Prison Industrial Complex Q-3 2027<br />
LX Restoration <strong>of</strong> Rights Q-4 2027<br />
Vol. XIV 2028 Culturally Relevant Programming<br />
LXI Community Culture Q-1 2028<br />
LXII Corporate Culture Q-2 2028<br />
LXIII Strategic Cultural Planning Q-3 2028<br />
LXIV<br />
<strong>The</strong> Cross-Sector/ Coordinated<br />
Service Approach to Delinquency<br />
Prevention<br />
Q-4 2028<br />
Page 143 <strong>of</strong> 160
Vol. XV 2029 Inner-Cities Revitalization<br />
LXIV<br />
LXV<br />
LXVI<br />
Part I – Strategic Housing<br />
Revitalization<br />
(<strong>The</strong> Twenty Percent Pr<strong>of</strong>it Margin)<br />
Part II – Jobs Training, Educational<br />
Redevelopment<br />
and Economic Empowerment<br />
Part III - Financial Literacy<br />
and Sustainability<br />
Q-1 2029<br />
Q-2 2029<br />
Q-3 2029<br />
LXVII Part IV – Solutions for Homelessness Q-4 2029<br />
LXVIII<br />
<strong>The</strong> Strategic Home Mortgage<br />
Initiative<br />
Bonus<br />
Vol. XVI 2030 Sustainability<br />
LXVIII Social Program Sustainability Q-1 2030<br />
LXIX<br />
<strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation<br />
Endowments Initiative<br />
Q-2 2030<br />
LXX Capital Gains Q-3 2030<br />
LXXI Sustainability Investments Q-4 2030<br />
Vol. XVII 2031 <strong>The</strong> Justice Series<br />
LXXII Distributive Justice Q-1 2031<br />
LXXIII Retributive Justice Q-2 2031<br />
LXXIV Procedural Justice Q-3 2031<br />
LXXV (75) Restorative Justice Q-4 2031<br />
LXXVI Unjust Legal Reasoning Bonus<br />
Page 144 <strong>of</strong> 160
Vol. XVIII 2032 Public Policy<br />
LXXVII Public Interest Law Q-1 2032<br />
LXXVIII Reforming Public Policy Q-2 2032<br />
LXXVIX ... Q-3 2032<br />
LXXVX ... Q-4 2032<br />
Page 145 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> e-Advocate Monthly Review<br />
2018<br />
Transformational Problem Solving January 2018<br />
<strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation February 2018<br />
Opioid Initiative<br />
Native-American Youth March 2018<br />
In the Juvenile Justice System<br />
Barriers to Reducing Confinement April 2018<br />
Latino and Hispanic Youth May 2018<br />
In the Juvenile Justice System<br />
Social Entrepreneurship June 2018<br />
African-American Youth July 2018<br />
In the Juvenile Justice System<br />
Gang Deconstruction August 2018<br />
Social Impact Investing September 2018<br />
Opportunity Youth: October 2018<br />
Disenfranchised Young People<br />
<strong>The</strong> Economic Impact <strong>of</strong> Social November 2018<br />
<strong>of</strong> Social Programs Development<br />
Gun Control December 2018<br />
2019<br />
<strong>The</strong> U.S. Stock Market January 2019<br />
Prison-Based Gerrymandering February 2019<br />
Literacy-Based Prison Construction March 2019<br />
Children <strong>of</strong> Incarcerated Parents April 2019<br />
African-American Youth in <strong>The</strong> May 2019<br />
Juvenile Justice System<br />
Page 146 <strong>of</strong> 160
Racial Pr<strong>of</strong>iling June 2019<br />
Mass Collaboration July 2019<br />
Concentrated Poverty August 2019<br />
De-Industrialization September 2019<br />
Overcoming Dyslexia October 2019<br />
Overcoming Attention Deficit November 2019<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong> Adversity December 2019<br />
2020<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hypersensitivity January 2020<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong> Introspection February 2020<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gift</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Introversion</strong> March 2020<br />
Page 147 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> e-Advocate Quarterly<br />
Special Editions<br />
Crowdfunding Winter-Spring 2017<br />
Social Media for Nonpr<strong>of</strong>its October 2017<br />
Mass Media for Nonpr<strong>of</strong>its November 2017<br />
<strong>The</strong> Opioid Crisis in America: January 2018<br />
Issues in Pain Management<br />
<strong>The</strong> Opioid Crisis in America: February 2018<br />
<strong>The</strong> Drug Culture in the U.S.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Opioid Crisis in America: March 2018<br />
Drug Abuse Among Veterans<br />
<strong>The</strong> Opioid Crisis in America: April 2018<br />
Drug Abuse Among America’s<br />
Teens<br />
<strong>The</strong> Opioid Crisis in America: May 2018<br />
Alcoholism<br />
Page 148 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> e-Advocate Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ological Jurisprudence<br />
Vol. I - 2017<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ological Origins <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Judicial Process<br />
Scriptural Application to <strong>The</strong> Model Criminal Code<br />
Scriptural Application for Tort Reform<br />
Scriptural Application to Juvenile Justice Reformation<br />
Vol. II - 2018<br />
Scriptural Application for <strong>The</strong> Canons <strong>of</strong> Ethics<br />
Scriptural Application to Contracts Reform<br />
& <strong>The</strong> Uniform Commercial Code<br />
Scriptural Application to <strong>The</strong> Law <strong>of</strong> Property<br />
Scriptural Application to <strong>The</strong> Law <strong>of</strong> Evidence<br />
Page 149 <strong>of</strong> 160
Legal Missions International<br />
Page 150 <strong>of</strong> 160
Issue Title Quarterly<br />
Vol. I 2015<br />
I<br />
II<br />
God’s Will and <strong>The</strong> 21 st Century<br />
Democratic Process<br />
<strong>The</strong> Community<br />
Engagement Strategy<br />
Q-1 2015<br />
Q-2 2015<br />
III Foreign Policy Q-3 2015<br />
IV<br />
Public Interest Law<br />
in <strong>The</strong> New Millennium<br />
Q-4 2015<br />
Vol. II 2016<br />
V Ethiopia Q-1 2016<br />
VI Zimbabwe Q-2 2016<br />
VII Jamaica Q-3 2016<br />
VIII Brazil Q-4 2016<br />
Vol. III 2017<br />
IX India Q-1 2017<br />
X Suriname Q-2 2017<br />
XI <strong>The</strong> Caribbean Q-3 2017<br />
XII United States/ Estados Unidos Q-4 2017<br />
Vol. IV 2018<br />
XIII Cuba Q-1 2018<br />
XIV Guinea Q-2 2018<br />
XV Indonesia Q-3 2018<br />
XVI Sri Lanka Q-4 2018<br />
Page 151 <strong>of</strong> 160
Vol. V 2019<br />
XVII Russia Q-1 2019<br />
XVIII Australia Q-2 2019<br />
XIV South Korea Q-3 2019<br />
XV Puerto Rico Q-4 2019<br />
Issue Title Quarterly<br />
Vol. VI 2020<br />
XVI Trinidad & Tobago Q-1 2020<br />
XVII Egypt Q-2 2020<br />
XVIII Sierra Leone Q-3 2020<br />
XIX South Africa Q-4 2020<br />
XX Israel Bonus<br />
Vol. VII 2021<br />
XXI Haiti Q-1 2021<br />
XXII Peru Q-2 2021<br />
XXIII Costa Rica Q-3 2021<br />
XXIV China Q-4 2021<br />
XXV Japan Bonus<br />
Vol VIII 2022<br />
XXVI Chile Q-1 2022<br />
Page 152 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> e-Advocate Juvenile Justice Report<br />
______<br />
Vol. I – Juvenile Delinquency in <strong>The</strong> US<br />
Vol. II. – <strong>The</strong> Prison Industrial Complex<br />
Vol. III – Restorative/ Transformative Justice<br />
Vol. IV – <strong>The</strong> Sixth Amendment Right to <strong>The</strong> Effective Assistance <strong>of</strong> Counsel<br />
Vol. V – <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ological Foundations <strong>of</strong> Juvenile Justice<br />
Vol. VI – Collaborating to Eradicate Juvenile Delinquency<br />
Page 153 <strong>of</strong> 160
<strong>The</strong> e-Advocate Newsletter<br />
Genesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Problem<br />
Family Structure<br />
Societal Influences<br />
Evidence-Based Programming<br />
Strengthening Assets v. Eliminating Deficits<br />
2012 - Juvenile Delinquency in <strong>The</strong> US<br />
Introduction/Ideology/Key Values<br />
Philosophy/Application & Practice<br />
Expungement & Pardons<br />
Pardons & Clemency<br />
Examples/Best Practices<br />
2013 - Restorative Justice in <strong>The</strong> US<br />
2014 - <strong>The</strong> Prison Industrial Complex<br />
25% <strong>of</strong> the World's Inmates Are In the US<br />
<strong>The</strong> Economics <strong>of</strong> Prison Enterprise<br />
<strong>The</strong> Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong> Prisons<br />
<strong>The</strong> After-Effects <strong>of</strong> Incarceration/Individual/Societal<br />
<strong>The</strong> Fourth Amendment Project<br />
<strong>The</strong> Sixth Amendment Project<br />
<strong>The</strong> Eighth Amendment Project<br />
<strong>The</strong> Adolescent Law Group<br />
2015 - US Constitutional Issues In <strong>The</strong> New Millennium<br />
Page 154 <strong>of</strong> 160
2018 - <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ological Law Firm Academy<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ological Foundations <strong>of</strong> US Law & Government<br />
<strong>The</strong> Economic Consequences <strong>of</strong> Legal Decision-Making<br />
<strong>The</strong> Juvenile Justice Legislative Reform Initiative<br />
<strong>The</strong> EB-5 International Investors Initiative<br />
2017 - Organizational Development<br />
<strong>The</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />
<strong>The</strong> Inner Circle<br />
Staff & Management<br />
Succession Planning<br />
Bonus #1 <strong>The</strong> Budget<br />
Bonus #2 Data-Driven Resource Allocation<br />
2018 - Sustainability<br />
<strong>The</strong> Data-Driven Resource Allocation Process<br />
<strong>The</strong> Quality Assurance Initiative<br />
<strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation Endowments Initiative<br />
<strong>The</strong> Community Engagement Strategy<br />
2019 - Collaboration<br />
Critical Thinking for Transformative Justice<br />
International Labor Relations<br />
Immigration<br />
God's Will & <strong>The</strong> 21st Century Democratic Process<br />
<strong>The</strong> Community Engagement Strategy<br />
<strong>The</strong> 21st Century Charter Schools Initiative<br />
2020 - Community Engagement<br />
Page 155 <strong>of</strong> 160
Extras<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it Advisors Group Newsletters<br />
<strong>The</strong> 501(c)(3) Acquisition Process<br />
<strong>The</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />
<strong>The</strong> Gladiator Mentality<br />
Strategic Planning<br />
Fundraising<br />
501(c)(3) Reinstatements<br />
<strong>The</strong> Collaborative US/ International Newsletters<br />
How You Think Is Everything<br />
<strong>The</strong> Reciprocal Nature <strong>of</strong> Business Relationships<br />
Accelerate Your Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development<br />
<strong>The</strong> Competitive Nature <strong>of</strong> Grant Writing<br />
Assessing <strong>The</strong> Risks<br />
Page 156 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 157 <strong>of</strong> 160
About <strong>The</strong> Author<br />
John C (Jack) Johnson III<br />
Founder & CEO<br />
Jack was educated at Temple University, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Rutgers<br />
Law School, in Camden, New Jersey. In 1999, he moved to Atlanta, Georgia to pursue<br />
greater opportunities to provide Advocacy and Preventive Programmatic services for atrisk/<br />
at-promise young persons, their families, and Justice Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals embedded in the<br />
Juvenile Justice process in order to help facilitate its transcendence into the 21 st Century.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re, along with a small group <strong>of</strong> community and faith-based pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, “<strong>The</strong> Advocacy Foundation, Inc." was conceived<br />
and developed over roughly a thirteen year period, originally chartered as a Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Educational<br />
Support Services organization consisting <strong>of</strong> Mentoring, Tutoring, Counseling, Character Development, Community Change<br />
Management, Practitioner Re-Education & Training, and a host <strong>of</strong> related components.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Foundation’s Overarching Mission is “To help Individuals, Organizations, & Communities Achieve <strong>The</strong>ir Full Potential”, by<br />
implementing a wide array <strong>of</strong> evidence-based proactive multi-disciplinary "Restorative & Transformative Justice" programs &<br />
projects currently throughout the northeast, southeast, and western international-waters regions, providing prevention and support<br />
services to at-risk/ at-promise youth, to young adults, to their families, and to Social Service, Justice and Mental<br />
Health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals” everywhere. <strong>The</strong> Foundation has since relocated its headquarters to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and been<br />
expanded to include a three-tier mission.<br />
In addition to his work with the Foundation, Jack also served as an Adjunct Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Law & Business at National-Louis<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Atlanta (where he taught Political Science, Business & Legal Ethics, Labor & Employment Relations, and Critical<br />
Thinking courses to undergraduate and graduate level students). Jack has also served as Board President for a host <strong>of</strong> wellestablished<br />
and up & coming nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations throughout the region, including “Visions Unlimited Community<br />
Development Systems, Inc.”, a multi-million dollar, award-winning, Violence Prevention and Gang Intervention Social Service<br />
organization in Atlanta, as well as Vice-Chair <strong>of</strong> the Georgia/ Metropolitan Atlanta Violence Prevention Partnership, a state-wide<br />
300 organizational member, violence prevention group led by the Morehouse School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Emory University and <strong>The</strong><br />
Original, Atlanta-Based, Martin Luther King Center.<br />
Attorney Johnson’s prior accomplishments include a wide-array <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Legal practice areas, including Private Firm,<br />
Corporate and Government postings, just about all <strong>of</strong> which yielded significant pr<strong>of</strong>essional awards & accolades, the history and<br />
chronology <strong>of</strong> which are available for review online. Throughout his career, Jack has served a wide variety <strong>of</strong> for-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
corporations, law firms, and nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations as Board Chairman, Secretary, Associate, and General Counsel since 1990.<br />
www.<strong>The</strong>AdvocacyFoundation.org<br />
Clayton County Youth Services Partnership, Inc. – Chair; Georgia Violence Prevention Partnership, Inc – Vice Chair; Fayette<br />
County NAACP - Legal Redress Committee Chairman; Clayton County Fatherhood Initiative Partnership – Principal<br />
Investigator; Morehouse School <strong>of</strong> Medicine School <strong>of</strong> Community Health Feasibility Study - Steering Committee; Atlanta<br />
Violence Prevention Capacity Building Project – Project Partner; Clayton County Minister’s Conference, President 2006-2007;<br />
Liberty In Life Ministries, Inc. – Board Secretary; Young Adults Talk, Inc. – Board <strong>of</strong> Directors; ROYAL, Inc - Board <strong>of</strong><br />
Directors; Temple University Alumni Association; Rutgers Law School Alumni Association; Sertoma International; Our<br />
Common Welfare Board <strong>of</strong> Directors – President)2003-2005; River’s Edge Elementary School PTA (Co-President); Summerhill<br />
Community Ministries; Outstanding Young Men <strong>of</strong> America; Employee <strong>of</strong> the Year; Academic All-American - Basketball;<br />
Church Trustee.<br />
Page 158 <strong>of</strong> 160
www.<strong>The</strong>AdvocacyFoundation.org<br />
Page 159 <strong>of</strong> 160
Page 160 <strong>of</strong> 160