2018 Full Legislative Update
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LMA LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY FOR <strong>2018</strong> SESSIONS<br />
compiled by the <strong>Legislative</strong> Team of the Louisiana Municipal Association<br />
(225) 344-5001 ■ (800) 234-8274 ■ www.lma.org ■ kwhite@lma.org<br />
First Special Session (2/19 – 3/5)<br />
• The session had the stated purpose of addressing the fiscal cliff for the FY19 operating budget,<br />
which was estimated at $648 million after federal tax changes.<br />
• The debate centered around how to address it: budget reform vs. increasing sales tax vs. increasing<br />
income tax.<br />
• At sine die, nothing had been done about the cliff, and only two measures passed:<br />
‣ HB 10 – protects homeowners who flooded in 2016 from having to file amended returns and<br />
pay additional state income taxes<br />
‣ HB 27 – increases the monthly wireless telecommunications fee to benefit the deaf by ½ cent<br />
(.05¢), from 4.5¢ to 5¢<br />
Regular Session (Non-fiscal) (3/12 – 5/18)<br />
• There were 901 House bills, 564 Senate bills, and 751 resolutions filed (totaling 2,216), which<br />
were reviewed and sorted for tracking by LMA <strong>Legislative</strong> Team – we tracked a total of 256 bills<br />
and resolutions.<br />
• Because this was a non-fiscal session, the legislature could not raise any revenue, which stymied<br />
the budget process. In the end, HB 1, the proposed operating budget for FY19, was labelled a<br />
“fake” or “pretend” budget, and was passed by both chambers, but was immediately vetoed by<br />
Gov. Edwards.<br />
• Further, while HB 2, the capital outlay budget, passed with LGAP and CWEP funded at $5M each,<br />
HB 3, the omnibus bond funding bill, did not pass. Thus, at the conclusion of the regular session,<br />
there was great uncertainty and acrimony about the state budget, spending, and taxation.<br />
• Of the tracked bills, 112 became law, and are summarized below, along with some defeated<br />
legislation.<br />
• LMA Package / LMA Supported Bills: these bills moved successfully through the legislative<br />
process<br />
‣ HB 230 – a LMA package bill, it allows another option for municipal investment<br />
‣ HB 286 – allows local police departments to charge up to $20 for crash reports over 2 pages,<br />
subject to LSP caps<br />
1
‣ HB 315 – increases the fess for constables and marshals for civil processing<br />
‣ HB 408 – confirms the authority of locals to set EMS reimbursement rates, and provides<br />
stability therein<br />
‣ HB 604 – provides health insurance for the families of LEO’s killed in the line of duty for 2<br />
years afterwards<br />
‣ HB 629 – allows the creation of a “municipal consortium,” intended to be an online version of<br />
the Main St. program<br />
‣ HB 819 – a LMA package bill, it changes the language of the Public Bid Law to allow for<br />
electronic submissions<br />
‣ SB 3 – provides MPERS survivor benefits to surviving spouses of officers killed in the line of<br />
duty by someone with intent to kill<br />
‣ SB 12 – provides survivor benefits for the children of slain police officers under MPERS<br />
‣ SB 261 – clarifies/expands the insurance benefits provided to LEO’s who sustained<br />
catastrophic injury in the line of duty<br />
‣ SB 263 – CA to permit the “borrowing” of public equipment and personnel with a written<br />
agreement<br />
‣ SB 312 – reduces the notification mandate for proposing or renewing property taxes from 30<br />
days to 20 days, thereby making the process easier in small municipalities whose official<br />
journal or regular meeting schedule may not accommodate<br />
‣ SB 426 – creates the Local Government Public Finance Act to provide uniformity and clarity<br />
in municipal bond issuance<br />
‣ SB 499 – mandates that the <strong>Legislative</strong> Auditor provide a best practices list to local auditees<br />
• Successfully Defeated Bills: with assistance from our local government partners, our<br />
membership, and sometimes strange bedfellows, many bills that would have adversely affected<br />
municipal governments were stopped. We had a very successful year, but here are just a few:<br />
‣ Capital Outlay Bills – HB 90, HB 122, and HB 132 all sought to overhaul the capital outlay<br />
process to make is more difficult for locals to access that funding, namely by repealing<br />
executive authority in favor of a 30-member approval committee, making the local match a<br />
non-waivable, mandatory match based on total project cost (not total funding sought), and<br />
abolishing all capital outlay funding to NGO’s<br />
‣ HB 500 – proposed a Constitutional Convention, including rewriting Articles VI, VII, VIII, X,<br />
XII, any section dealing with revenue or a fund, sub-fund, account, or other designation of<br />
2
funds, and Article XIV. local government finance; levee districts and regional floor protection<br />
authorities; all methods of taxation; revenue sharing; the Transportation Trust Fund; the<br />
Minimum Foundation Program to fund K-12; and higher education management and funding.<br />
We joined the Police Jury Association, School Board Association, Sheriff's Association,<br />
Assessor's Association, School Superintendents, District Attorneys Association, and the<br />
Louisiana Conference of Mayors, among others, in opposing the bill.<br />
‣ SB 462 – this preemptive bill would have abolished the local authority to mandate inclusionary<br />
zoning as part of economic development and community betterment; it was passed by both<br />
chambers, but we subsequently vetoed<br />
• Cooperative Efforts: the LMA <strong>Legislative</strong> Team worked closely with legislators and stakeholders<br />
to protect municipal interests, while allowing the bills to move forward in the legislative process.<br />
‣ HB 749 – a.k.a., the “Uber/Lyft” bill, this provided uniform regulations for transportation<br />
network companies in LA. Last year, the LMA <strong>Legislative</strong> Team joined forces with other<br />
stakeholders to beat this preemptive bill. This year, the TNC’s were willing to negotiate with<br />
local governments, and we agreed on language that addressed our members’ concerns so that<br />
we were neutral on the bill. Despite our neutrality, the bill failed to pass.<br />
‣ HB 900 – this effort led by Treasurer Schroder establishes a revolving, low-interest capital<br />
outlay loan fund for locals to use, which is funded from the unclaimed property state fund.<br />
This bill was vetoed by Gov. Edwards on 5/31.<br />
• Legislation Regarding the Practice of Law: there were both substantive and administrative<br />
changes to note, here.<br />
‣ HB 5 – provides that a dismissal after settlement does not equate to a “voluntary dismissal”<br />
for the purposes of the interrupting prescription<br />
‣ HB 6 – mandates that courts sets pretrial conferences upon request when a suit has been<br />
pending for more than one year<br />
‣ HB 16 - mandates that the court take judicial notice of all laws without any action by a party<br />
‣ HB 174 – provides a multitude of revisions to the CCP, mostly clerical in nature<br />
‣ HB 550 – reduces the time delay to respond to written interrogatories from 30 days to 15 days<br />
in family law matters<br />
‣ HB 723 – if a public records custodian sues a requestor based on their request, and the requestor<br />
prevails, they will get attorneys fee and costs of litigation<br />
‣ HB 744 – during an emergency or disaster, a court may sign orders and judgments outside of<br />
its territorial jurisdiction<br />
3
• Mayor’s Court:<br />
‣ HB 622 – delays the implementation of income-sensitive payment of criminal fines, fees,<br />
costs, and restitution until August of 2019<br />
‣ HB 669 – gives the presiding judge/magistrate discretion whether to suspend or place a<br />
hold on the driver’s license of a person who fails to appear for court<br />
• Ethics Legislation:<br />
‣ HB 7 – changes “sworn statement” to “certification” for elected officials disclosing transaction<br />
with governmental entities<br />
‣ HB 51 - provides a dual officeholding exception for certain CPAs<br />
‣ HB 86 – provides an ethics exception regarding park rental to immediate family members<br />
‣ HB 188 – provides exceptions for acceptance of transportation, admission, and lodging under<br />
certain circumstances<br />
‣ HB 346 – removes an exception for persons who have served as a board member or mayor’s<br />
designee on a board, to later be employed by that board<br />
• Retirement Legislation: the bills noted below are largely ministerial in nature<br />
‣ Firefighters Retirement System – HB 9, HB 40, HB 41<br />
‣ MERS – HB 26, HB 27, HB 28, HB 29, HB 30, HB 31, HB 32, HB 34 (this one applicable<br />
to all systems)<br />
‣ MPERS – HB 771, SB 7, SB 8<br />
• Opposed Bills: despite vigorous opposition, there were a few adverse bills that passed.<br />
‣ SB 94 – if public contracts are not paid within 45 days of acceptance of the work, then .5%<br />
interest will attach per day up to 15%. Though most municipalities timely pay all invoices, we<br />
opposed this measure for Constitutional and preemptive reasons.<br />
• Tax Matters:<br />
‣ HB 155 – increases the fees levied by the Tax Commission for certain property assessments<br />
‣ HB 250 – removed the July 15 th publication mandate on roll-forward tax hearings, so that<br />
notice must be simply prior to 30 days before the hearing, etc.<br />
‣ HB 598 – authorizes local taxing authorities to accept payments now in exchange for tax<br />
credits toward future taxes for those under ITEP exemption<br />
4
‣ HB 684 – allows municipal governments to grant tax incentives to those who donate money to<br />
the municipality<br />
‣ HB 840 - prohibits the issuance of occupational licenses to an applicant who intends to sell<br />
used tires unless the applicant submits the necessary permits from the Dept. of Environmental<br />
Quality<br />
‣ SB 93 – mandates that notice of intent for ad valorem taxes to fund VFD’s include a statement<br />
that a portion of those funds will go to statewide retirement systems<br />
• Law Enforcement:<br />
‣ HB 112 – provides penalties for persons who expose LEO’s to serious infectious diseases<br />
‣ HB 210 - provides that officers have 30-day notice prior to a hearing to revoke P.O.S.T.<br />
certification<br />
‣ HB 221 – clarifies provision regarding DNA testing of LEO’s<br />
‣ HB 474 – adds domestic violence and deaf communication curriculum to P.O.S.T. certification<br />
training<br />
• Miscellaneous Bills:<br />
‣ HB 35 – added an imprisonment option up to 30 days for gross littering violations<br />
‣ HB 54 – provides new threshold requirements by population for recall elections<br />
‣ HB 135 – creates a non-waivable fee for liquor permits but ONLY as to commercial airlines<br />
‣ HB 388 – streamlines volunteer assistance for disaster recovery via GOHSEP and local<br />
governments<br />
‣ HB 409 – changes the dates regarding precinct change limitations<br />
‣ HB 524 – clarifies the mandatory sexual harassment training for all public employees<br />
‣ HB 573 – allows political subdivisions to perform integrated coastal projects through outcomebased<br />
contracting<br />
‣ HB 579 – adds glaucoma, severe muscle spasms, intractable pain, and post-traumatic stress<br />
disorder to the list of conditions for which a physician may prescribe marijuana<br />
‣ HB 633 – creates a pilot program for LDH to test lead levels in school drinking water<br />
‣ HB 645 – clarifies the requirements and duties for a Uniform Command Group post-disaster<br />
5
‣ HB 837 – provides regarding crime prevention districts<br />
‣ SB 360 – reduces the frequency of enhanced audits when a local auditee has 3 years of no<br />
findings<br />
Constitutional Amendments for Fall<br />
(1) ACT 717 (SB 263) – Donation of Public Equipment<br />
Do you support an amendment to permit, pursuant to written agreement, the donation<br />
of the use of public equipment and personnel by a political subdivision upon request to<br />
another political subdivision for an activity or function which the requesting political<br />
subdivision is authorized to exercise? (Amends Const. Art. VII, §14(B))<br />
(2) ACT 718 (SB 164) – Phase-In of Property Tax Increases of 50% or More<br />
Do you support an amendment that will require that any reappraisal of the value of<br />
residential property by more than 50%, resulting in a corresponding increase in property<br />
taxes, be phased-in over the course of four years during which time no additional<br />
reappraisal can occur and that the decrease in the total ad valorem tax collected as a result<br />
of the phase-in of assessed valuation be absorbed by the taxing authority and not allocated<br />
to the other taxpayers? (Amends Article VII, Section 18(A) and (F))<br />
(3) ACT 719 (SB 31) – Felons Holding Public Office<br />
Do you support an amendment to prohibit a convicted felon from seeking or holding public<br />
office or appointment within five years of completion of his sentence unless he is<br />
pardoned? (Adds Article I, Section 10.1)<br />
(4) ACT 720 (SB 59) – Transportation Trust Fund<br />
Do you support an amendment to remove authority to appropriate or dedicate monies in<br />
the Transportation Trust Fund to state police for traffic control purposes? (Amends Article<br />
VII, Section 27(B)(1))<br />
(5) ACT 721 (SB 163) – Special Tax Treatment Extended to Property In Trust<br />
Do you support an amendment to extend eligibility for the following special property tax<br />
treatments to property in trust: the special assessment level for property tax valuation, the<br />
property tax exemption for property of a disabled veteran, and the property tax exemption<br />
for the surviving spouse of a person who died while performing their duties as a first<br />
responder, active duty member of the military, or law enforcement or fire protection<br />
officer? 2 (Adds Article VII, Sections 18(G)(6), 21(K)(4) and (M)(4))<br />
6
(6) ACT 722 (SB 243) – Unanimous Jury Verdicts<br />
Do you support an amendment to require a unanimous jury verdict in all noncapital felony<br />
cases for offenses that are committed on or after January 1, 2019? (Amends Article I,<br />
Section 17(A))<br />
Second Special Session (5/22 – 6/4)<br />
• This was crunch time for addressing the FY19 fiscal cliff, and the debate remained substantially<br />
unchanged.<br />
‣ The House plan was to renew 1/3 of the 5th penny, eliminate some sales tax breaks and<br />
continue sales taxes on business utilities, raising $400M; the Senate plan would have renewed<br />
½ of that penny while keeping business utility taxes, extending suspension on tax exemptions,<br />
and imposing a temporary sales tax on immovable property, which would have raised $540M<br />
‣ Though both chambers passed HB 1, supplemental appropriations bills, and HB 3, the budget<br />
fell short of the funding needed to maintain a standstill budget and fund services/state agencies.<br />
Without revenue, it was estimated that public universities would be cut by $96M, TOPS by<br />
30% percent, and there would be big cuts to Corrections, DA’s and Sheriffs.<br />
• In the last moments of this session, which adjourned at midnight, a stalling technique prevented<br />
the House from voting on any revenue-raising measure.<br />
Third Special Session (6/18 – 6/24)<br />
• HB 10: this instrument became “the deal,” setting forth a renewal of .45 of the 5 th penny and<br />
maintaining suspension of exemptions through 2025 ($463M per year)<br />
• HB 1: after passage of HB 10, this new appropriations bill that fully funds TOPS, higher education,<br />
hospitals, nursing homes, food stamps, and other services/state agencies was passed<br />
• The session adjourned 3 days early after four months of contentious fighting.<br />
Read and research legislative instruments online at www.lma.org<br />
and www.legis.la.gov<br />
7