16.12.2012 Views

PMR cover.psd - ppiaf

PMR cover.psd - ppiaf

PMR cover.psd - ppiaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Program Manager’s Report — Table of Contents<br />

1. Letter from the Program Manager to PPIAF’s Donors, May 11, 2012<br />

2. FY2012 Portfolio Report: July 1, 2011 – March 31, 2012<br />

PPIAF and SNTA Total Funding in Q1-Q3 FY2012 vs. Q1-Q3 FY2011—Regional and<br />

Sectoral Split<br />

Status of PPIAF Approved Activities Inception to Date—July 1999 to March 2012<br />

3. PPIAF Work Program 2011–2013<br />

Activities Approved in Q1-Q3 of FY2012, Classified in Accordance with PPIAF Work<br />

Program 2011–2013<br />

4. Regional Updates of PPIAF’s Activities Around the World<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

East Asia and the Pacific<br />

Eastern Europe and Central Asia<br />

Latin America and the Caribbean<br />

Middle East and North Africa<br />

South Asia<br />

5. Impact Stories<br />

PPIAF Supports Small-Scale Water Providers in Uganda<br />

PPIAF Helps Peruvian Sub-Nationals Tap Financial Markets: the Case of the<br />

Municipality of Lima<br />

SNTA Supports a Water Utility in Brazil’s Frontier Region<br />

PPIAF Supports Private Sector Participation in the Solid Waste Sector in Ethiopia<br />

PPIAF Support to the Enabling Environment for Public-Private Partnerships in<br />

Malawi<br />

6. Non-Core Trust Fund Status Reports<br />

PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund for Middle-Income Countries<br />

PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response to the Global Financial Crisis<br />

PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund on Integrating Climate Change Agenda with Public-<br />

Private Partnerships<br />

Report for IFC on Fragile States


Dear friends,<br />

1<br />

May 11, 2012<br />

I am pleased to present to you the FY2012 Program Manager’s Report. As you will notice from this report,<br />

this has been another active year for PPIAF, in which we continued delivering important technical<br />

assistance to governments. We are constantly innovating to deliver better, faster, and efficient technical<br />

assistance, adapted to the stage of development and needs of each country. Herein please find a<br />

summary of the various areas in which we have been working this year:<br />

Technical assistance to client governments<br />

During the first three quarters of FY2012, PPIAF has provided funding of close to $9.5 million for 71<br />

activities under the PPIAF and Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) programs across all regions.<br />

This is a significant increase on the same period in FY2011 when approved activities totaled $4.2 million.<br />

In Sub-Saharan Africa, the second quarter was a highlight and saw strong demand with 17 PPIAF<br />

activities approved for a value of over $2.4 million, the largest quarterly commitment to Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa since the second quarter of fiscal 2010.<br />

In the Middle East and North Africa, PPIAF is supporting the first public-private partnership (PPP)<br />

transaction in the West Bank and Gaza by providing funding for legal advisory transaction support for the<br />

Southern West Bank Solid Waste Management Project, to be structured by the IFC. In the same region<br />

the first SNTA activity was approved, with the Ministry of Interior and Municipalities in Lebanon embarking<br />

on an ambitious decentralization policy. The activity will provide creditworthiness support to the Al Fayhaa<br />

Union of Municipalities and the Municipalities of Tripoli, Mina, and Beddawi.<br />

PPIAF has also been active in other regions such as Eastern Europe and Central Asia where it is<br />

helping the government of Albania prepare a privatization strategy for several hydropower plants.<br />

In South Asia, PPIAF is supporting PPP pipeline preparation and initial implementation with funds to the<br />

government of Nepal to support the screening and initial feasibility assessment of a pipeline of potential<br />

PPP projects, and also in the Maldives providing post-award contract management support for a<br />

pioneering PPP transaction in the solid waste management sector.<br />

In Latin America and the Caribbean, PPIAF is supporting the preparation of a performance-based<br />

efficiency improvement contract for the National Water and Sewerage Agency (IDAAN)’s Colon Business<br />

Unit.<br />

Lastly, in East Asia and the Pacific, PPIAF is supporting an activity in Lao PDR that will assess the<br />

suitability of transport projects to be structured as PPPs. In this period the SNTA program in East Asia<br />

and the Pacific also concluded its first activity in Indonesia for the assessment of the creditworthiness of<br />

four major regional cities.<br />

The technical assistance granted in FY2012 fits within the approved work program. We include herein the<br />

FY2012 portfolio reports (core and non-core trust funds) and a list of activities approved in FY2012<br />

organized as per PPIAF’s work program.<br />

In Q1-Q3 FY2012, we approved the following total grant amounts per DAC status:


LICs<br />

MICs<br />

PPIAF SNTA<br />

DAC 1 $3,398,631 50%<br />

$297,995 24%<br />

59%<br />

DAC 2 $622,900 9% $46,750 4%<br />

DAC 3 $1,576,513 23%<br />

$561,300 45%<br />

41%<br />

DAC 4 $1,172,665 18% $329,780 27%<br />

Total $6,770,709 100% $1,235,825 100%<br />

These numbers do not include global activities or those approved from the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

for Middle-Income Countries.<br />

In FY2012 we have been proactively and systematically developing activities for PPIAF and SNTA<br />

support. We are doing this in many ways, including the following:<br />

a) Attending one-on-one meetings with government officials in many developing countries around<br />

the world. A small group of 8 members has had meetings with government officials in 16<br />

countries in the regions listed below, engaging in a systematic effort country by country to<br />

develop a solid pipeline of technical assistance based on current expressed needs of the<br />

governments. This meets the PMU’s and Donors objectives of developing capacity and<br />

providing support in DAC I and DAC II countries:<br />

a. Sub-Saharan Africa: Burkina Faso (DAC 1), Chad (DAC 1), The Gambia (DAC 1),<br />

Guinea-Bissau (DAC 1), Kenya (DAC 2), Lesotho (DAC 1), Mozambique (DAC 1), Niger<br />

(DAC 1), Senegal (DAC 1), South Africa (DAC 4), Tanzania (DAC 1), and Uganda (DAC<br />

1)<br />

b. Middle East and North Africa: Egypt, Jordan<br />

c. East Asia and the Pacific: Indonesia, and the Philippines<br />

b) Engaging daily with our colleagues from the World Bank (WB), IFC, and several of your<br />

representatives in various countries (including MCC in Washington, DC and Lesotho; DFID in<br />

Mozambique and South Africa; SECO in South Africa; USAID in Washington, DC; AusAID in<br />

Australia; etc.) to develop activities to provide technical assistance and to disseminate the type of<br />

support we can provide. One example is assistance (approved) to the government of Lesotho to<br />

develop a PPP to provide ICT interconnectivity for more than 150 health clinics, which are being<br />

refurbished and built by MCC; this activity is being developed in collaboration with IFC.<br />

c) Expanding the Help Desk for the benefit of the Ghana PPP Unit (agreement signed in December<br />

1, 2011).<br />

d) Developing dedicated calls for proposals, based on our assessment of the needs in various<br />

countries and the importance to provide a rapid response. The table below summarizes the<br />

various calls for proposals launched to date and the number of proposals received as of March<br />

31, 2012. We continue to receive and evaluate proposals on an ongoing basis.<br />

Title/objective Launch Date(s)<br />

Project Pipeline Screening and Initial<br />

Feasibility Assessment of Potential<br />

Infrastructure PPPs<br />

Support to Infrastructure PPPs in<br />

Fragile and Conflict-Affected States<br />

October 14, 2011 11<br />

February 8, 2012 4<br />

2<br />

28%<br />

72%<br />

Number of<br />

proposals received


Title/objective Launch Date(s)<br />

Project Pipeline Screening and Initial<br />

Feasibility Assessment of Potential<br />

Infrastructure PPPs in Small Island<br />

Developing States<br />

Water and Sanitation in Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa<br />

Climate Change Adaptation and<br />

Mitigation Project Initiative<br />

Fast Track SNTA Proposals for Low-<br />

Income Countries<br />

Joint PPIAF-GPOBA-ESMAP Call for<br />

Proposals for Rural Electrification in<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

February 10, 2012 1<br />

October 6, 2011 24<br />

February 8, 2012 7<br />

May 24, 2011 and February 8, 2012 30<br />

April 4, 2011 and September 13, 2011 4<br />

3<br />

Number of<br />

proposals received<br />

e) Providing Rapid Response expert consultancy services to governments in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

who have various projects and wish to receive feedback on their plans to develop and implement<br />

various PPP projects, identifying the feasibility of their projects, their readiness, and the steps<br />

required to structure those projects. This Rapid Response is being delivered by the consulting<br />

firm Castalia Advisors and consists of short in-country missions by PPP experts, to come up with<br />

a priority list and the steps needed to develop those projects further.<br />

In FY2012 Castalia performed the following rapid-response missions:<br />

Country Objective Date Results<br />

Ghana<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

Assess current situation and work<br />

with government counterparts and<br />

Bank team to identify options for<br />

the optimum arrangements for the<br />

provision of urban water services<br />

Provide guidance to the<br />

government on the development<br />

and implementation of its PPP<br />

program, <strong>cover</strong>ing the transport,<br />

electricity, telecommunications<br />

and water sectors<br />

Monitoring and evaluation<br />

October<br />

2011<br />

January<br />

2012<br />

� Final report: Institutional Options for<br />

Improving Water Supply in Ghana<br />

� Broad options presented to Minister<br />

of Water Resources, Works, and<br />

Housing on October 21, 2011<br />

� Final report delivered to government,<br />

and task team in discussion with<br />

government on next steps<br />

� PPIAF to support one of the identified<br />

PPP projects once there is an<br />

agreement to move forward<br />

In FY2012 we have continued the work begun in FY2011 to capture the results of PPIAF’s work in our<br />

internal database, based on PPIAF’s new refined system of methodically measuring results. In particular,<br />

we continue to prepare country write-ups summarizing PPIAF assistance in each country where PPIAF<br />

has provided support. From a total of 24 countries researched as of the June 2011 Casablanca Program<br />

Council Meeting (PCM), we have now completed 61 countries researched as of May 4, 2012. These<br />

country write-ups are all available on the PPIAF website. The 2012 Monitoring and Evaluation Report


contains a comprehensive list of outputs, outcomes, and impacts captured in our database as of this date.<br />

This consists of very detailed research to extract the results of PPIAF-funded work over the past 13 years.<br />

When possible, we have been validating these results during our meetings with government officials of<br />

the various countries visited this year, as well as with the corresponding WB and IFC Task Team Leaders<br />

(TTLs).<br />

As requested during the June 2011 Casablanca PCM, we have prepared a logframe for PPIAF and<br />

SNTA. On November 22, 2011 we sent it to all donors for comments. Again, we revised it in May 2012<br />

and are including it as part of the documentation for the Kampala PCM. As of this date we have not<br />

received any comments. The proposed logframe is being submitted for PCM approval.<br />

We also commissioned an external independent review of PPIAF’s monitoring and evaluation indicators<br />

and system by Castalia Advisors. The results of the review will be presented in Kampala.<br />

Communication and dissemination<br />

PPIAF is now 13 years old. Although it works upstream, many activities supported by the program since<br />

1999 have produced visible results on the ground. To highlight the visible, lasting impacts PPIAF has<br />

achieved, we continue to prepare and disseminate our series of Impact Stories that give examples of<br />

results of PPIAF’s interventions in a particular country, country write-ups that summarize the technical<br />

assistance PPIAF has given and the corresponding results by country, and Regional Updates that<br />

provide a wider view of the work PPIAF and its SNTA program have been supporting in a particular<br />

region. This report contains a few Impact Stories and the FY2012 Regional Updates.<br />

In FY2012, we have been more strategic regarding communicating about the PPIAF program and its<br />

results, as well as disseminating best practices. Our main targets to receive relevant information have<br />

been: 1) our client governments, main beneficiaries of PPIAF assistance; 2) your institutions, so that they<br />

know what the program is doing; 3) internal WB and IFC staff, to know how best to access our funds and<br />

work with PPIAF; and 4) the general public. We have a contact list of over 1,000 people who receive<br />

valuable information and updates from PPIAF once or twice a month. To accomplish this, we have<br />

restructured the PPIAF website and focused on increased communication with our donors and partners.<br />

PPIAF website. In October 2011 PPIAF launched a better organized and more substantive website. We<br />

spent several months re-designing it and preparing new content to make it more relevant. It now contains<br />

more detailed information on PPIAF’s work in a particular infrastructure sector or theme (e.g., fragile<br />

states), and aims to become a one-stop resource on PPP- or infrastructure-related information. Our main<br />

objectives are to convey more clearly what PPIAF is and what it has been doing since its founding in<br />

1999, as well as to disseminate in an organized manner the knowledge that has been supported by your<br />

institutions for many years to make it accessible to client governments and the wider public.<br />

In particular, the new website now includes:<br />

� A section on PPIAF’s work in its strategic themes (universal access, climate change,<br />

urbanization, SNTA, fragile states, regional integration, and capacity building), which includes<br />

related links, PPIAF publications, lessons learned, pages on specific topics when relevant, and<br />

final PPIAF-funded reports when available. Specific topic pages include information on PPIAF<br />

support to: gender, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, sub-national credit<br />

ratings, sub-national performance improvement, and PPP units.<br />

� A section on PPIAF’s work in its priority sectors (power, water and sanitation, transportation,<br />

telecommunications, and irrigation), which includes pages with detailed information of PPIAF<br />

support in its sub-sectors and final PPIAF-funded reports when available. Specific topic pages<br />

include information on PPIAF support to: electricity generation, transmission, and distribution;<br />

rural electrification; renewable energy and energy efficiency; non-revenue water; solid waste<br />

4


management; small-scale water providers; wastewater and sewerage; airports; ports; railways;<br />

bus rapid transit; light rail; and highways.<br />

� PPIAF’s Knowledge Center, a valuable source of up-to-date information on infrastructure and<br />

PPPs, with materials and resources that explore current trends and encourage discussion, written<br />

by experts in the field. In particular, PPIAF's Library includes PPIAF publications, PPIAF-funded<br />

reports, books, short notes, case studies, and other resources.<br />

� A section on the results PPIAF has achieved over the past 13 years, which includes all of the<br />

country write-ups drafted to date, as well as PPIAF’s Impact Stories series that highlights<br />

examples of successful PPIAF and SNTA activities.<br />

In the first three quarters of FY2011, PPIAF’s website received 6,937 visits and 22,403 total page views.<br />

In Q1-Q3 FY2012, www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org received 10,205 visits and 28,889 total page views. This is an increase<br />

of 47%.<br />

PPIAF is also regularly communicating its results and online resources to donors and their teams in the<br />

field, as well as to people from developing countries met in the last two years by PPIAF team members.<br />

From August 2011 to March 31, 2012, PPIAF sent 11 emails in this respect.<br />

Date Email Subject<br />

September 9, 2011<br />

PPIAF Publications and Resources on Non-Revenue Water and the Water and<br />

Sanitation Sector<br />

October 20, 2011 Launching of PPIAF's New and Improved Website<br />

November 1, 2011 PPIAF Reports and Resources on Solid Waste Management<br />

November 9, 2011<br />

PPIAF, 11 Years of Upstream Work Producing Visible Results on the Ground—<br />

Feature Story<br />

December 1, 2011 PPIAF Reports and Resources on Irrigation<br />

December 10, 2011 PPIAF Support in the Transport Sector<br />

January 31, 2012 PPIAF Support in the Telecommunications Sector<br />

March 1, 2012 PPIAF Support to PPP Units, Small-Scale Water Providers, and IFC's Handshake<br />

March 9, 2012 Recent PPIAF-funded and Sponsored Publications<br />

March 16, 2102<br />

PPIAF Support to Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency; Climate Change<br />

Mitigation and Adaptation; Infrastructure Regulation; Lessons Learned on Pricing<br />

and Affordability; and Updates from the PPPIRC Website<br />

March 30, 2012 Recent PPIAF Publications and Updates from PPIAF-funded Activities<br />

We have received many positive comments:<br />

Date Sender Comments<br />

September<br />

9, 2011<br />

October 20,<br />

2011<br />

November<br />

1, 2011<br />

Momodou Lamin Sompo<br />

Ceesay, Senior Electricity<br />

Engineer, Public Utilities<br />

Regulatory Authority, The<br />

Gambia<br />

Gulla Jan, Graduate Student,<br />

KDI School, South Korea<br />

Andrew N. Bvumbe, Head Debt<br />

Management Office, Ministry of<br />

Finance, Zimbabwe<br />

Many thanks for the links to the documents and it’s nice to hear<br />

from you. I've already downloaded a few and would continue to<br />

read others. The PPP Reference looks good and should become<br />

very handy.<br />

Thank you so much for sharing such kind of information with me. It<br />

is really useful and hope it will work to apply in Afghanistan.<br />

Thank you very much for the information. This is going to be useful<br />

for the MOF as we are in the process of setting up a PPP Unit.<br />

5


Date Sender Comments<br />

November<br />

9, 2011<br />

December<br />

1, 2011<br />

December<br />

19, 2011<br />

January 31,<br />

2012<br />

March 1,<br />

2012<br />

Lourenço Veniça, Economist,<br />

Road Fund, Mozambique<br />

Demba Jallow, Corporate<br />

Planning Manager, National<br />

Water and Electricity Company<br />

LTD, The Gambia<br />

Ms Tchimsi Atchabao, Advisor,<br />

Research & Development, Togo<br />

Free Zone Authority (SAZOF),<br />

Togo<br />

Zewdineh B. Haile, Consultant<br />

and Attorney at Law, Zee Law<br />

Office, Ethiopia<br />

Marc Frilet, Chief Editor, Head<br />

of PPP Working Group, French<br />

Institute of International Legal<br />

Experts and Paris Bar<br />

Thank you for networking us in this subject. We will keep following<br />

up all the international discussions and practices regarding this<br />

specific subject.<br />

Thanks you for this valuable information. We will review and try to<br />

find a way reaching out for support.<br />

I just run through the precious files you willingly shared with us. I<br />

would like to extend special Thanks to you and the Team for your<br />

care.<br />

This is just to say thanks a million. Your successive emails have<br />

truly bridged-up the communication gap. We met last in Addis over<br />

lunch with your colleague a couple of months ago. The Kigali<br />

workshop was a great success and your presentation was the best.<br />

The documents you have shared with us are another testimonial<br />

for the quality service your institution has been providing to the<br />

public at large.<br />

As you may know, the international industry and in particular the<br />

Confederation of International Contractor Association (CICA) and<br />

its PPP working group representing the industry together with the<br />

French Institute of International Experts (IFEJI) and the Paris Bar<br />

have been working closely with the World Bank, various PPP Units,<br />

and other international financial associations in order to contribute<br />

to the success of PPPs around the world.<br />

In this respect, we have not only advertised your publications but<br />

also use them a lot as a basis for contributing to develop the<br />

conditions of success of PPP mostly in developing countries where<br />

such conditions remain often to be designed in several areas.<br />

Continuing proactive exchanges on the conditions of success of<br />

PPPs with a good equilibrium between the expectations of the<br />

public sector, the consumers and the industry, is more important<br />

than ever. Indeed with the financial crisis it is essential to<br />

understand how to attract investors for long term and resilient PPP.<br />

We are convinced that with our joint efforts the preparation and<br />

planning of a pipeline of good PPPs which is so far difficult to<br />

achieve in many countries may become a realistic goal.<br />

Disseminating PPP best practices. We continue to disseminate the various global knowledge products<br />

developed by PPIAF with PPP units in developing countries, universities, Academia, and other interested<br />

people. The team has attended several conferences, seminars, and other events in Africa and Asia to<br />

further disseminate our knowledge products and share our experience on PPPs. We have also<br />

participated as speakers at conferences sponsored by PPIAF and at others organized by third parties or<br />

other partners. We are also expanding our communication efforts to a wider audience within the World<br />

Bank Group.<br />

In FY2012, the PPP in Infrastructure Resource Center (PPPIRC) team was asked to review PPIAF’s<br />

recently developed online database of PPIAF-funded activities. The review’s primary objective was to<br />

determine whether any legal precedents or materials relating to the establishment of PPPs funded by<br />

PPIAF could be further disseminated through the PPPIRC. The PPPIRC team did a full review of PPIAF’s<br />

database to find high-quality material. Legally relevant documents (including sample agreements and<br />

draft legislation) from 25 activities were selected for dissemination, as they were considered to be good<br />

precedents, which would complement existing documents published on the PPPIRC website.<br />

6


Communicating with donors. We have prepared short donor-partnership documents summarizing the<br />

history of each partnership, common areas for priority support, and some results to date, so that you can<br />

disseminate to other staff within your institution, in your home country, or abroad, so that other colleagues<br />

know more about the program that you have been funding and we can collaborate better. We have<br />

shared all of these documents with you, and final versions can be found on the PPIAF website in the<br />

About Us section.<br />

At least monthly, we have been sharing with you and with your teams in country offices for whom you<br />

sent us email addresses, the new material we are writing and publishing. In a visit to one of your offices in<br />

South Africa, we were very pleased to see that the material we have distributed on sub-national finance in<br />

Africa was on the meeting table!<br />

Annual report. On September 30, 2011 we released to you and to the public PPIAF’s FY2011 annual<br />

report; the report was finalized within the time period required in the Program Charter. It provides a good<br />

picture of our program in FY2011. We look forward to your comments.<br />

Preparation of selected articles for publication. We continue drafting Feature Stories that highlight<br />

and comment on current happenings relevant to PPIAF, including selected events, activities, and articles<br />

that are published on PPIAF’s website. We are also regular contributors to IFC’s quarterly Handshake<br />

Magazine, with published articles on Cities and PPPs, Meeting the Challenges of Water Scarcity and<br />

Distribution through PPPs, Climate Change and PPPs, and Healthcare and PPPs.<br />

Knowledge and learning for client governments<br />

Capacity building seminars. At the request of various governments in Africa and in other countries, we<br />

have prepared and participated as speakers at various PPP seminars with the objective of developing<br />

capacity in government officials, explaining what PPPs are and how they can be structured, emphasizing<br />

the importance of developing a clear enabling environment to provide confidence to investors, and<br />

providing examples of how PPIAF assistance has led to specific PPP projects.<br />

Country Date<br />

Partners/<br />

organizers<br />

7<br />

Topic<br />

Guinea-Bissau November 8–10, 2011 IFC, WBI, WB PPP training in Bissau 35<br />

Mozambique November 1–10, 2011 WB, DFID<br />

Kenya December 1–2, 2011<br />

Jordan April 2–4, 2012<br />

Switzerland February 21–23, 2012<br />

Senegal<br />

June 5–8, 2012 (to<br />

come)<br />

AfDB, AME<br />

Trade<br />

WB, Carbon<br />

Finance-Assist<br />

Program,<br />

Government of<br />

Jordan<br />

WBI, ADB,<br />

UNECE, IFC,<br />

Swiss<br />

Government<br />

SECO, Global<br />

Energy Basel<br />

Foundation<br />

IFC, WSP,<br />

AfDB<br />

PPP training for mega<br />

projects<br />

Number of<br />

participants<br />

30<br />

Africa PPP conference 200<br />

Regional Workshop on<br />

Selecting and Implementing<br />

Nationally Appropriate<br />

Mitigation Measures<br />

(NAMAs)<br />

PPPs and OBA: improving<br />

accountability in service<br />

provision<br />

Energy Basel Summit 2012 60<br />

50 from<br />

Middle East<br />

and North<br />

Africa region<br />

500 from 90<br />

countries<br />

PPPs in Water 100 (target)


We have also sponsored several other capacity building events, as follows:<br />

Country Date Partners Topic<br />

Nigeria<br />

November 14–16,<br />

2011<br />

South Africa March 26, 2012 AFD<br />

Singapore January 15–21, 2012<br />

IFC, WBI, WB<br />

ESMAP, ADB,<br />

WBI, AFD,<br />

SSATP<br />

8<br />

PPP Workshop on Best<br />

Practices and Lessons<br />

Learned from Recent<br />

African Case Studies<br />

Municipal Revenue<br />

Management Master Class<br />

Capacity Building Training<br />

Leaders in Urban Transport<br />

Planning<br />

Number of<br />

participants<br />

300<br />

40 from 13<br />

countries in<br />

Africa<br />

66<br />

participants<br />

from 33<br />

countries<br />

In these events, we disseminated close to 4,000 copies of PPIAF materials, including PPIAF publications<br />

and Impact Stories, to around 1,400 people.<br />

Preparing lessons learned and other knowledge materials. We continue preparing materials to share<br />

lessons learned on PPPs, disseminating case studies funded by PPIAF and publishing them on the<br />

website, and preparing short notes on various topics, including a series of notes on PPPs in fragile states,<br />

sub-national financing, and pricing and affordability in essential infrastructure services.<br />

Partnerships. We are constantly looking for new partners to deliver much-needed training on PPPs to<br />

government officials, mainly from Africa. We have spoken with the Development Bank of South Africa and<br />

the PPP Unit of South Africa, within the National Treasury, to partner for the delivery of training to<br />

governments who so desire this, as they have an established training program. We also partnered with<br />

the Agence Française de Développement to deliver training on sub-national financing in Durban in March<br />

2012.<br />

Strengthening collaboration<br />

We continue developing new partnerships and strengthening existing ones with key players such as the<br />

Global Partnership for Output-Based Aid (GPOBA), the Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), the Energy<br />

Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), IFC InfraVentures, IFC’s Conflict-Affected States in<br />

Africa (CASA) initiative, and other teams from the World Bank and IFC, to innovate on new and more<br />

effective ways of providing technical assistance. These relationships will help us to be more strategic and<br />

focused, as well as ensure that our interventions are sequenced and achieve results. Some of the<br />

partnerships we continue developing include:<br />

Cities Alliance: Joint donor meeting in Kampala in June 2012; co-sponsoring the Policy Advisory Forum<br />

under the topic ―Financing of African Cities,‖ held in Maputo on November 7, 2011; and participating in<br />

Cities Alliance Program Council Meeting held on November 8–9, 2011.<br />

A partnership with Cities Alliance has as objective to maximize the synergies between the two programs<br />

and will enable us to leverage more resources to support the urban development of African Cities. Cities<br />

Alliance is supporting Urban Planning to meet future needs of populations; PPIAF can support the<br />

development and implementation of specific infrastructure projects, which are identified in this planning<br />

process, as follows: structuring PPPs and supporting improvements in the financial capacity of public<br />

utilities, whether providing water, electricity, urban transport, waste collection, etc. With our various


instruments and concerted efforts, both Cities Alliance and PPIAF can contribute to improve the access of<br />

populations from African Cities to basic infrastructure services.<br />

IFC: PPIAF team members were invited to participate in three IFC in-country trainings (Kenya, Egypt, and<br />

Turkey) to strengthen the relationship between our teams; one of our staff members is working out of<br />

IFC’s office in Dubai, thus collaborating very closely; developing and delivering joint in-country trainings;<br />

doing joint IFC-PPIAF missions to various countries, including Niger, Chad, Burkina Faso, and Lesotho;<br />

developing a sub-national program for Turkey in support of commercial borrowing by second-tier<br />

municipalities.<br />

Financial solutions group of WB: As the financial solutions group works to structure political risk<br />

guarantees in support of various complex PPPs, PPIAF has been providing some specific transaction<br />

support. This includes, among others, support to develop the Lake Turkana Wind Energy project, the<br />

Geothermal Development Corporation of Kenya set up to develop geothermal energy, and support for<br />

private development in the Nigerian power sector.<br />

IFC InfraVentures: PPIAF is providing support to some of their project-related work. For example, PPIAF<br />

is currently assisting the government of Mali in reviewing and negotiating the legal documentation for the<br />

Scatec solar PPP project.<br />

Most of the activities PPIAF supports are in conjunction with its numerous partners. In particular, some<br />

examples of activities PPIAF has provided funding for in FY2012 that were co-financed by other<br />

complementary organizations are:<br />

� Mozambique: preparation of a gas sector master plan, with Norad<br />

� South Africa: regional capacity building workshop on sub-national financing, with the Agence<br />

Française de Développement<br />

� Senegal: regional conference on PPPs in water and sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa, with<br />

Infrastructure Consortium for Africa<br />

Funding<br />

In FY2012 we have prepared, negotiated, and finalized many Trust Fund Agreements through which your<br />

institutions and governments have pledged new funding for the PPIAF and SNTA programs. This work<br />

implied the detailed preparation of proposals, their discussion either by telephone, VC, or in meetings,<br />

and obtaining the corresponding approvals. We thank you for your continuous support.<br />

Reporting on FY2010 Strategy for Resource Allocation<br />

During the June 2010 Nairobi PCM, we presented the PPIAF and SNTA 2010 Strategy for Resource<br />

Allocation, which responded to the request made at the March 2009 Rome PCM—following the<br />

recommendations of CEPA—to articulate more clearly the guiding principles behind PPIAF’s operations.<br />

The Strategy for Resource Allocation proposed to continue using the filters that have guided activity<br />

selection in the past, which are consistent with the Program Council’s stated priorities, but added some<br />

elements to improve the focus of our operations.<br />

After two years of implementation, we are pleased to continue seeing the results of this Strategy for<br />

Resource Allocation. Requests for PPIAF funding are still much more focused; the Project Cycle Planning<br />

Worksheet that we incorporated into our applications is helping us ensure that at the time of activity<br />

inception, we understand what the expected results are, and how the activity will contribute directly or<br />

indirectly to increased private sector investment in infrastructure.<br />

Since November 2010 we have been reviewing all concepts and application requests for PPIAF funding<br />

in weekly Team Review Meetings. This has proven to be an effective mechanism to collectively screen,<br />

9


early on, preliminary requests for funds, and to discuss in detail complete applications, complementing<br />

them when needed with the team’s experience and valuable inputs. Included in this report you will find the<br />

FY2012 Portfolio Report containing a table with brief descriptions of the activities approved and<br />

committed in FY2012, as well as a summary of the PPIAF portfolio since inception (FY1999–2012). Our<br />

review process is also enabling us to monitor more closely our pipeline of proposals and activities to<br />

ensure they make progress and proceed without problems, and to ensure the availability of funds.<br />

We are also sequencing activities to ensure the beneficiary government accepts the results of the<br />

technical assistance provided before proceeding to the next phase: upon the completion of an activity, if<br />

the beneficiary government decides to move further, we analyze requests for follow-up technical<br />

assistance until a private sector project materializes. This has proven to be an effective process to ensure<br />

ownership of the results from the beneficiaries.<br />

We look forward to your continued support to our program.<br />

Best regards,<br />

Adriana de Aguinaga<br />

Program Manager<br />

Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF)<br />

10


FY2012 Portfolio Report: July 1, 2011 – March 31, 2012<br />

April 1, 2012<br />

Dear Program Council Members:<br />

During the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, PPIAF provided funding of over $9.5 million for 71 activities<br />

under the PPIAF and Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) programs. Some activity highlights are<br />

described below.<br />

In Sub-Saharan Africa, PPIAF approved 32 activities, with a value of over $3.9 million, representing 41%<br />

of region-specific PPIAF and SNTA funding. In Rwanda, PPIAF is providing support to the Energy, Water,<br />

and Sanitation Authority (EWSA), the off-taker for a bulk water public-private partnership (PPP) project,<br />

which is the first major PPP for urban water supply in Kigali. This activity will strengthen EWSA’s ability to<br />

oversee and implement the PPP transaction currently being structured by the International Finance<br />

Corporation (IFC). In Mali, PPIAF is providing transaction support to the government to review and<br />

negotiate the Scatec solar and Kenie hydropower projects, which are being developed by IFC<br />

InfraVentures.<br />

In the Middle East and North Africa, PPIAF is supporting the first PPP transaction in the West Bank and<br />

Gaza by providing funding for legal advisory support for the Southern West Bank Solid Waste<br />

Management Project. The Al-Minya Landfill will provide improved solid waste management services to<br />

approximately 780,000 inhabitants. It is expected to open in early 2013 and will process approximately<br />

34% of the solid waste in the West Bank.<br />

In Latin America and the Caribbean, PPIAF is supporting an innovative activity in Colombia that will<br />

help the government structure and implement a financing window to harness private sector support in<br />

developing approximately 7,000 hectares of land identified under the Macroproyectos housing program.<br />

In Brazil PPIAF is also helping to develop a sustainable forestry concession model in the Amazon.<br />

In Eastern Europe and Central Asia, PPIAF is helping the government of Albania prepare a privatization<br />

strategy for several hydropower plants, including Bistrica 1 (25 MW) and Bistrica 2 (5 MW) on the River<br />

Bistrica, and Ulza (25.2 MW) and Shkopeti (25 MW) on the River Mati, and is providing support to the<br />

Armenia Water and Sewerage Company for the design of a new enhanced management contract for<br />

2011–2013.<br />

In South Asia, PPIAF has provided funds to the governments of Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka to<br />

undertake the screening and initial feasibility assessment of a pipeline of potential PPP projects. In the<br />

Maldives PPIAF is providing post-award contract management support for a pioneering PPP transaction<br />

in the solid waste management sector.<br />

In East Asia and the Pacific, SNTA is helping the City of Tanuan improve its capacity for fiscal and<br />

financial management. Tanuan is currently considering a local currency loan for up to PHP 450 million<br />

(approximately $10 million) with IFC support to finance its capital expenditure program in essential<br />

infrastructure identified in the city’s Annual Investment Plan. The planned transaction would not involve<br />

inter-governmental transfers as security, and if successful, would be the first example of a Philippine local<br />

government accessing market-based financing.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Adriana de Aguinaga<br />

Program Manager<br />

1


Seventy-One Activities worth $9.5 Million Approved in the First Three Quarters of<br />

Fiscal 2012<br />

PPIAF approved 71 PPIAF and SNTA activities in the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, worth a<br />

total of $9.5 million, as presented in Table 1 below.<br />

Table 1: Funding Source<br />

Source No. of Activities Value (USD)<br />

PPIAF Activities 59 8,267,380<br />

SNTA Activities 12 1,235,825<br />

Total 71 9,503,205<br />

B. The geographic focus of the 59 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 2. Activities<br />

in Sub-Saharan Africa represented the largest share of the portfolio, accounting for 41% of the portfolio.<br />

In the SNTA program, activities in Sub-Saharan Africa also represented the largest share of the portfolio<br />

(42%), as summarized in Table 3.<br />

Table 2: Geographic Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />

Region<br />

Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

2<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No. of<br />

Projects<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa 3,409,435 41 27 46<br />

Middle East & North Africa 1,367,050 17 7 12<br />

Global 933,000 11 3 5<br />

Latin America & the Caribbean 874,775 11 5 8<br />

Eastern Europe & Central Asia 773,100 9 6 10<br />

South Asia 489,400 6 7 12<br />

East Asia & the Pacific 420,620 5 4 7<br />

Total 8,267,380 100 59 100<br />

Table 3: Geographic Focus of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />

Region<br />

Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No. of<br />

Projects<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa 519,745 42 5 41<br />

Latin America & the Caribbean 329,780 27 3 25<br />

Middle East & North Africa 236,300 19 2 17<br />

East Asia & the Pacific 150,000 12 2 17<br />

Total 1,235,825 100 12 100


C. The sectoral focus of the 59 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 4. Energy<br />

activities accounted for 35% of the portfolio, totaling over $2.5 million.<br />

Table 4: Sectoral Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />

Sector<br />

Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

3<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No. of<br />

Projects<br />

Energy 2,552,415 35 14 24<br />

Multi-sector 2,324,584 24 17 29<br />

Telecommunications 1,212,080 15 8 13<br />

Water & sanitation 1,123,481 13 13 22<br />

Transport 1,054,820 13 7 12<br />

Total 8,267,380 100 59 100<br />

D. The primary action areas of the 59 approved PPIAF activities are summarized in Table 5 1 .<br />

Activities focused on infrastructure development strategies took the largest share of funding, representing<br />

46% of the portfolio. The primary action areas of the approved SNTA activities are summarized in Table<br />

6.<br />

Table 5: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />

Action Area<br />

Infrastructure development<br />

strategies<br />

Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No. of<br />

Projects<br />

3,802,293 46 26 44<br />

Pioneering transactions 2,019,020 24 11 19<br />

Consensus building 200,000 2 1 2<br />

Capacity building 787,776 10 11 18<br />

Policy, regulatory, and<br />

institutional reforms<br />

750,291 9 8 14<br />

Emerging best practice 708,000 9 2 3<br />

Total 8,267,380 100 59 100<br />

1 In practice, many approved activities from the PPIAF and SNTA funds comprise actions that correspond to two or<br />

more of these specific categories. The breakdown above is based on the PMU’s judgment as to the primary focus of<br />

each approved activity.


Table 6: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />

Action Area<br />

Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

4<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No. of<br />

Projects<br />

Specific performance improvement 609,295 49 6 50<br />

Financing 296,750 24 3 25<br />

Other 254,780 21 2 17<br />

Credit rating 75,000 6 1 8<br />

Total 1,235,825 100 12 100<br />

E. The breakdown of PPIAF and SNTA support by funding source in the first three quarters of<br />

fiscal 2012 is presented below in Table 7.<br />

Table 7: Breakdown of PPIAF and SNTA support by funding source<br />

Source of funds<br />

Total<br />

Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No. of<br />

Projects<br />

Multi-Donor Trust Fund II 3,613,383 37 29 41<br />

Sweden Sub-Saharan Africa Fund 1,443,660 15 4 6<br />

SNTA 1,235,825 13 12 17<br />

SECO/DFID: Response to the Global<br />

Financial Crisis<br />

748,365 8 5 7<br />

IFC Fragile States 640,401 7 6 8<br />

Norway/Netherlands: Integrating<br />

Climate Change Agenda with PPP<br />

Program<br />

634,850 7 4 6<br />

SECO: Middle-Income Countries 563,671 6 6 8<br />

Austria Climate Change 400,600 4 1 1<br />

Japan: Contribution from the Policy<br />

and Human Resources Development<br />

Fund (PHRD)<br />

USAID for Water and Sanitation<br />

Fund for Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

150,000 2 2 3<br />

72,450 1 2 3<br />

Total 9,503,205 100 71 100<br />

A list of all PPIAF and SNTA approved activities during the first three quarters is included in Annex 1.


Annex 1<br />

Approved Activities for the Period July 1, 2011–March 31, 2012<br />

Activities approved from the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Funds have been shaded using the key below. All<br />

other activities were approved from PPIAF’s Core Trust Fund, which includes IFC Fragile States and<br />

Austria Climate Change activities.<br />

Core funds:<br />

Japan: Contribution from the Policy and Human Resources Development Fund (PHRD)<br />

Norway/Netherlands: Integrating Climate Change Agenda with PPP Program<br />

SECO/DFID: Response to the Global Financial Crisis<br />

SECO: Middle-Income Countries<br />

Sweden Sub-Saharan Africa Fund<br />

USAID for Water and Sanitation Fund for Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

Austria Climate Change<br />

IFC Fragile States<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

PPIAF Activities<br />

1. AFRICA: African<br />

Energy Ministers'<br />

Conference<br />

2. AFRICA: Legal<br />

Services in Support of<br />

the West African Power<br />

Pool’s Power Interconnector<br />

Project for<br />

Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia,<br />

Sierra Leone, and<br />

Guinea<br />

Promoting the dissemination of knowledge<br />

on technical and financial solutions for<br />

expanded access to low-carbon sources of<br />

energy. This activity will facilitate the<br />

formation of consensus on priorities for<br />

supporting Africa's low carbon, climate<br />

resilient energy development agenda,<br />

including in the context of climate change<br />

negotiations.<br />

Assisting the task team to further develop<br />

and finalize the various legal agreements<br />

involved in establishing the Special<br />

Purpose Companies and providing the<br />

appropriate framework for commercial and<br />

private sector transactions on the line. This<br />

work complements other studies that are<br />

underway to prepare an institutional<br />

business plan and the legal framework for<br />

the inter-connector project.<br />

5<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$40,000 Energy<br />

$70,800 Energy<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

3. AFRICA: Lighting<br />

Africa Expansion<br />

4. AFRICA: Regional<br />

Conference on PPPs in<br />

Water and Sanitation in<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />

5. BURUNDI: Project<br />

Pipeline Screening and<br />

Initial Feasibility<br />

Assessment of Potential<br />

Infrastructure PPPs in<br />

the Energy Sector<br />

6. CAMEROON:<br />

Support to the Cameroon<br />

Water Sector<br />

7. COMOROS: Options<br />

Evaluation and Strategic<br />

Roadmap for the<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Sector of the Union of<br />

Comoros<br />

8. COTE D'IVOIRE:<br />

Improving Users’<br />

Awareness on Cost<br />

Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development-Additional<br />

funding<br />

Increasing access to off-grid lighting and<br />

micro-energy systems for the poor in eight<br />

African countries by replicating the<br />

successful market-development pilots<br />

implemented previously in Kenya and<br />

Ghana with PPIAF support. This activity is<br />

co-financed with AFREA, Norwegian Trust<br />

Fund, ESMAP, GPOBA, and CDKN.<br />

Explaining what the private sector has to<br />

offer in the delivery of water and sanitation<br />

services in Sub-Saharan Africa. The<br />

conference will be held in Dakar, Senegal<br />

on June 5–8, 2012.<br />

Providing advisory support to improve<br />

energy sector investment planning and<br />

provide pipeline screening of potential<br />

PPPs.<br />

Helping the government of the Republic of<br />

Cameroon to identify and propose solutions<br />

towards more effective cooperation<br />

between the Government, Camwater and<br />

Camerounaise des Eaux that will improve<br />

the implementation of the water PPP and<br />

restore the financial equilibrium of the<br />

sector.<br />

Analyzing the options to facilitate<br />

competition in the telecommunications<br />

sector, identifying the necessary steps to<br />

develop robust competition in the sector,<br />

and preparing a sector roadmap for the<br />

government. The proposed activity and<br />

sector roadmap will provide critical inputs to<br />

the preparation of an investment project.<br />

The investment project will enable Comoros<br />

to join a regional connectivity adaptable<br />

program loan program for Eastern and<br />

Southern Africa.<br />

Supporting the government of Côte<br />

d’Ivoire’s efforts raise awareness, build<br />

users’ coalition and to demonstrate<br />

concrete improvements in the lives of its<br />

citizens, a critical step for sustaining social<br />

and political stability in the country. This<br />

activity will educate infrastructure users on<br />

the urgent need for their participation in<br />

funding the development of the country's<br />

infrastructure to improve its sustainability.<br />

6<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$250,000 Energy<br />

$50,000 Water<br />

$74,500 Energy<br />

$40,000 Water<br />

$75,000 Telecom<br />

$67,438<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Emerging Best<br />

Practices<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

9. COTE D'IVOIRE:<br />

PPP Pipeline and<br />

Enabling Environment<br />

Support<br />

10. GABON: PPP<br />

Program<br />

11. GHANA: Institutional<br />

Options for Improving<br />

Urban Water Supply in<br />

Ghana (Phase 2)<br />

12. GUINEA: Mining<br />

Ancillary Infrastructure<br />

13. GUINEA: PPP<br />

Training Workshop<br />

14. GUINEA-BISSAU:<br />

PPP Training Workshop<br />

15. LESOTHO: Legal<br />

Advisory Support to ICT<br />

and Facilities<br />

Management PPP<br />

16. KENYA: Lake<br />

Turkana Wind Due<br />

Diligence Project<br />

Strengthening the enabling environment in<br />

Côte d'Ivoire through targeted policy<br />

recommendations and identifying a pipeline<br />

of PPPs that could be prepared now and<br />

brought on the market in the immediate<br />

future.<br />

Enabling the government of Gabon to<br />

advance its PPP agenda from both a<br />

transaction and enabling environment stand<br />

point. This activity will include an enabling<br />

environment assessment, PPP pipeline<br />

diagnostic, and options for creating<br />

institutional capacity on PPPs.<br />

Conducting a detailed options analysis for<br />

institutional reform of the urban water<br />

sector in Ghana, in an attempt improve the<br />

performance and financial sustainability of<br />

the sector. It is hoped that such reform will<br />

lead to the commercialization of the sector<br />

and increased private sector investment.<br />

Supporting the government of Guinea in<br />

creating an enabling environment for the<br />

realization of PPPs in mining ancillary<br />

infrastructure development.<br />

Supporting a three-day PPP training<br />

workshop that will be a learning platform for<br />

approx. 50 key stakeholders to share best<br />

practices and emerging lessons regarding<br />

the design, implementation and monitoring<br />

of PPPs, focused on sectors that are<br />

directly relevant to Guinea.<br />

Supporting a three-day PPP training<br />

workshop to build the capacity of<br />

stakeholders involved in PPP project<br />

development and increase awareness of<br />

PPPs.<br />

Providing legal consultant to support the<br />

International Finance Corporation’s work in<br />

the development and implementation of an<br />

ICT and Facilities Management PPP<br />

transaction.<br />

Providing technical, commercial, legal, and<br />

financial expertise to the Kenya Power<br />

Company to support the development of<br />

the Lake Turkana Wind Project. This<br />

activity includes a review of project<br />

documents, providing strategic inputs, and<br />

supporting the Kenya Power Company in<br />

Power Purchase Agreement negotiations.<br />

7<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$74,640<br />

$74,640<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

$68,431 Water<br />

$490,000 Transport<br />

$57,763<br />

$49,963<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

$301,160 Telecom<br />

$294,900 Energy<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

17. MALI: Capacity<br />

Building Support to the<br />

Scatec and Kenie<br />

Projects<br />

18. MALI: Improving<br />

Governance and<br />

Accountability to Foster<br />

an Enabling Environment<br />

for Private Sector<br />

Participation in the<br />

Electricity and Water<br />

Sectors<br />

19. MALI: Legal<br />

Advisory to the<br />

Government of Mali for<br />

the Scatec Solar Project<br />

20. MOZAMBIQUE:<br />

Preparation of a Gas<br />

Sector Master Plan<br />

21. NIGER: Evaluation<br />

of Projects with Private<br />

Participation for<br />

Production and Supply of<br />

Electricity in Rural Areas<br />

22. NIGERIA: Support<br />

for Private Development<br />

of the Power Sector<br />

23. NIGERIA: Workshop<br />

on Water Utility Reform<br />

24. RWANDA: Kigali<br />

Bulk Water Supply<br />

Project—Technical<br />

Assistance and Capacity<br />

Training<br />

Providing transaction support to the<br />

government of Mali to review and negotiate<br />

the Scatec solar and Kenie hydropower<br />

projects as PPPs.<br />

Assisting the government of Mali to<br />

restructure the energy and water sectors by<br />

reviewing existing regulatory framework<br />

and practices, including the role of key<br />

stakeholders, evaluating existing and<br />

envisaged PPP arrangements, and<br />

formulating guidance on avoiding and/or<br />

managing potential risks.<br />

Assisting the government of Mali to review<br />

and negotiate the legal documentation for<br />

the Scatec Solar PPP project.<br />

Supporting the development of a gas sector<br />

roadmap in Mozambique with an emphasis<br />

on stimulating private sector participation.<br />

This activity will develop a gas master plan,<br />

identify sector reforms necessary to attract<br />

private investment, and prepare policy<br />

decisions to help the government of<br />

Mozambique meet its petroleum objectives.<br />

Supporting the government of Niger in the<br />

preliminary assessment of potential<br />

infrastructure projects to develop a pipeline<br />

of feasible projects with private sector<br />

participation. The result of the assessment<br />

will serve to inform future government<br />

decisions on which projects to prioritize for<br />

further development as IPPs or PPPs.<br />

Supporting the creation of a conducive<br />

investment environment for private sector<br />

generating companies selling power to the<br />

bulk trader and building capacity among<br />

local stakeholders in developing, financing,<br />

and contracting for Independent Power<br />

Producers.<br />

Supporting a workshop to examine the core<br />

issues that confront management of<br />

underperforming utilities in Nigeria on a<br />

daily basis.<br />

Assisting the Energy, Water and Sanitation<br />

Authority to identify the best organizational<br />

structure, develop a long-term master plan,<br />

and strengthen its monitoring and<br />

management capacity.<br />

8<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$49,890 Energy<br />

$74,890<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector<br />

$49,950 Energy<br />

$250,000 Energy<br />

$60,000 Energy<br />

$402,500 Energy<br />

$32,450 Water<br />

$207,700 Water<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Capacity<br />

Building


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

25. SOUTH AFRICA:<br />

Pre-feasibility Study for a<br />

Cycling Program in the<br />

City of Johannesburg<br />

26. SUDAN: South<br />

Sudan-Diagnostic of<br />

Power Distribution<br />

System<br />

27. ZIMBABWE:<br />

Assessment of PPP<br />

Enabling Environment<br />

and PPP Pipeline<br />

Supporting a pre-feasibility study to<br />

determine the steps and projects which<br />

would make up a comprehensive,<br />

sustainable and integrated cycling program<br />

in the city of Johannesburg.<br />

Conducting a diagnostic study to<br />

determining the investment and energy<br />

requirements to upgrade/rehabilitate the<br />

power distribution system in Juba, South<br />

Sudan.<br />

Providing technical assistance to the<br />

government of Zimbabwe to develop and<br />

implement its PPP program in the<br />

transportation, electricity,<br />

telecommunication, and water sectors.<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

SNTA Activities<br />

28. AFRICA: Regional<br />

Capacity Building<br />

Workshop with Agence<br />

Française de<br />

Développement on<br />

Revenue Management<br />

29. BURKINA FASO:<br />

Strengthening of Fiscal<br />

Revenues for the<br />

Municipality of<br />

Ouagadougou<br />

30. GHANA: Increasing<br />

Access to Market-Based<br />

Financing for<br />

Municipalities in the<br />

Greater Accra Area<br />

Enhancing the ability of the cities to<br />

effectively collect their revenues and to<br />

generate additional resources. Through the<br />

improvement of their financial health and<br />

performance, the cities will increase their<br />

ability to raise funds and invest in<br />

infrastructures related to service delivery.<br />

Supporting the analysis of how to optimize<br />

fiscal and non fiscal resources for the city of<br />

Ouagadougou. The realization of this<br />

analysis is part of a series of initiatives that<br />

follow the recommendations of the Public<br />

Expenditure Financial Accountability<br />

assessment, prepared for that city with<br />

PPIAF and Agence Français de<br />

Développement support, on how to<br />

strengthen the financial health of the city.<br />

Preparing a diagnostic of the structure of the<br />

market for financial tools for the local<br />

governments and municipal/state owned<br />

enterprises in charge of public infrastructure<br />

to develop urban infrastructure in Ghana.<br />

The main objective of this activity is to<br />

increase local governments and<br />

municipal/state owned enterprises' access<br />

to private credit to finance public<br />

infrastructure.<br />

9<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

$74,820 Transport Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

$75,000 Energy<br />

$53,000<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$75,000<br />

$75,000<br />

$175,000<br />

Multisector<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

Specific<br />

performance<br />

improvement<br />

Financing<br />

Financing


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

31. KENYA:<br />

Assessment of<br />

Geothermal<br />

Development Company<br />

for Enhanced Access to<br />

Finance<br />

32. MAURITANIA:<br />

PEFA Study for the<br />

Communauté Urbaine<br />

de Nouakchott<br />

East Asia and the Pacific<br />

Conducting a quick diagnosis of the financial<br />

situation and administration of the<br />

Geothermal Development Company to<br />

identify critical success factors, key<br />

performance areas, weaknesses, and the<br />

risks. The review will also include a systemic<br />

review of the financial management<br />

arrangements looking at the budgeting,<br />

accounting, financial reporting, internal<br />

audit, and internal control.<br />

Conducting a financial management<br />

assessment of the Communauté Urbaine de<br />

Noukchott to strengthen the municipality's<br />

financial performance.<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

PPIAF Activities<br />

33. PHILIPPINES:<br />

Options to Expand<br />

Private Sector<br />

Participation in the<br />

Development of the<br />

Irrigation Sector<br />

34. LAOS: Transport<br />

Sector Enabling<br />

Environment Assessment<br />

and Pipeline Screening<br />

35. VIETNAM:<br />

Feasibility Study and<br />

PPP Options for the<br />

Implementation of a<br />

Nation-Wide e-ID System<br />

for the Delivery of Public<br />

Services<br />

36. VIETNAM:<br />

Strengthening of the Use<br />

of Performance-Based<br />

Contracts for Road<br />

Maintenance<br />

Supporting the Department of Agriculture<br />

to identify and address policy, regulatory,<br />

and institutional constraints that limit the<br />

recourse to PPPs; develop the capacity to<br />

identify viable and bankable projects and<br />

to plan and manage the development of<br />

the irrigation sector; and identify a pipeline<br />

of bankable projects, some of which could<br />

be supported during a follow-up phase.<br />

Supporting the government of Lao PDR to<br />

conduct the preliminary assessment of the<br />

potential for PPPs in Lao PDR as an input<br />

to the Lao National Strategy for Transport<br />

Sector.<br />

Assisting the government of Vietnam<br />

formulate a sound infrastructure<br />

development strategy and build capacity in<br />

the design and execution of a PPP e-ID<br />

system. The proposed TA will be<br />

comprised of three major components: a<br />

PPP options study and recommendations;<br />

a series of capacity-building activities; and<br />

knowledge dissemination.<br />

Analyzing the current approach to<br />

performance-based contracts for road<br />

maintenance in Vietnam and developing a<br />

road map to strengthen these contracts.<br />

10<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

$46,750 Energy Financing<br />

$147,995<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Multisector<br />

$100,000 Water<br />

$50,000 Transport<br />

$230,620 Telecom<br />

$40,000 Transport<br />

Specific<br />

performance<br />

improvement<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

SNTA Activities<br />

37. INDONESIA: Jakarta<br />

Credit Rating<br />

38. PHILIPPINES:<br />

Assisting Tanuan City in<br />

Enhancing the City’s<br />

Creditworthiness<br />

Eastern Europe and Central Asia<br />

Supporting the updated credit rating and<br />

financial management assessment of DKI<br />

Jakarta, and strengthening of Jakarta’s<br />

newly established Debt Management Unit<br />

in assessing and monitoring debt.<br />

Supporting the city of Tanuan in<br />

enhancing its capacity for fiscal and<br />

financial management to improve its<br />

bankability and creditworthiness.<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

PPIAF Activities<br />

39. ALBANIA: Technical<br />

Assessments of Bistrica<br />

1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and<br />

Shkopeti Hydropower<br />

Plants<br />

40. ALBANIA: Universal<br />

Access and Service<br />

Policy Framework in the<br />

ICT Sector<br />

41. ARMENIA: Advisory<br />

Support for Private<br />

Sector Involvement in<br />

Operation of Regional<br />

Bus-Stations<br />

42. ARMENIA: Support<br />

to the Armenia Water<br />

and Sewerage Company<br />

with the design of the<br />

enhanced Management<br />

Contract for 2011–2013<br />

Helping the government of Albania<br />

prepare a privatization strategy for<br />

hydropower plants. Technical,<br />

environmental, and social impact<br />

assessments will be conducted in this<br />

activity.<br />

Assisting the Authority of Electronic and<br />

Postal Communications to develop a<br />

comprehensive policy for its Universal<br />

Access and Service Program.<br />

Developing a plan for the improvement of<br />

the performance of bus stations<br />

operations through private sector<br />

involvement. This activity will develop<br />

performance standards for bus station<br />

operations, assess the operator's financial<br />

condition, and identify possible sources for<br />

additional revenue.<br />

Supporting the State Committee on Water<br />

Economy to prepare and process an<br />

enhanced Management Contract with the<br />

incumbent operator for the Armenia Water<br />

and Sewerage Company service area for<br />

2011–2013. This activity will ensure the<br />

contract's compliance with the overall long<br />

term economic/financial goals of the<br />

sector.<br />

11<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$75,000<br />

$75,000<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

$75,000 Energy<br />

$148,100 Telecom<br />

$75,000 Transport<br />

$75,000 Water<br />

Credit Rating<br />

Specific<br />

performance<br />

improvement<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

43. MOLDOVA:<br />

Feasibility Study for<br />

Cloud-Based Shared<br />

Infrastructure PPP<br />

44. TAJIKISTAN:<br />

Drafting a new<br />

Investment Law in<br />

Tajikistan<br />

Global activities<br />

Funding the completion of an M-Cloud<br />

feasibility study that will describe various<br />

options for developing and managing an<br />

M-Cloud PPP, detail relative advantages<br />

and disadvantages of each, identify risks<br />

and suggest risks allocation and mitigation<br />

strategies.<br />

Providing technical assistance to draft a<br />

new investment law and to conduct an<br />

independent valuation of two silver<br />

deposits in Tajikistan.<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

PPIAF Activities<br />

45. GLOBAL: Leaders in<br />

Urban Transport<br />

Program—Translation<br />

and Workshop Delivery<br />

46. GLOBAL: PPI<br />

Database Funding for<br />

FY12 and FY13<br />

47. GLOBAL: The<br />

Governance of Basic<br />

Local Public Services -<br />

3 rd Global Report on<br />

Decentralization and<br />

Local Democracy (GOLD<br />

III)<br />

Responding to a high demand for the<br />

Leaders in Urban Transport Program by<br />

translating all the course material in<br />

French and by delivering two workshops<br />

for an audience of policymakers from lowto-mid-income<br />

French speaking<br />

developing countries.<br />

Supporting the PPI database to provide<br />

critical data and analysis in an objective<br />

manner to government policy-makers,<br />

academia, the donor community, and<br />

other stakeholders. The PPI database<br />

disseminates information on trends in the<br />

private provision of infrastructure services,<br />

provides detailed project-level data, and<br />

identifies emerging trends and changing<br />

market conditions.<br />

Supporting United Cities & Local<br />

Governments to produce the 3rd Global<br />

Report, which will identify the role of local<br />

authorities in providing basic services. The<br />

report will focus on better understanding<br />

this role, the possibilities of partnering with<br />

other stakeholders, and identifying which<br />

future developments should be promoted<br />

to improve access to basic services.<br />

12<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$200,000 Telecom<br />

$200,000<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector<br />

$75,000 Transport<br />

$658,000<br />

$200,000<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Emerging Best<br />

Practices<br />

Consensus<br />

Building


Latin America and the Caribbean<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

PPIAF Activities<br />

48. BRAZIL: Improving<br />

the Sustainable Forestry<br />

Concession Model in the<br />

Amazon<br />

49. COLOMBIA: Private<br />

Financing Window for<br />

Low-Income Housing<br />

Projects<br />

50. PANAMA:<br />

Preparation of a<br />

Performance-Based<br />

Efficiency Improvement<br />

Contract for IDAAN’s<br />

Colón Business Unit<br />

51. PERU: PPP Options<br />

for Irrigation<br />

Infrastructure<br />

52. URUGUAY:<br />

Development of<br />

Financing Options for<br />

PPPs in Roads Sector<br />

Developing a forestry concession model<br />

and advising the concession process of<br />

the National Forests (―Flonas‖) of Itaituba I<br />

& II, located in the Brazilian State of Pará.<br />

The total area of these two Flonas is<br />

641,105 hectares. The concession<br />

comprises a natural production forest with<br />

a project area of 416,718 hectares,<br />

including 333,000 hectares of net<br />

productive area, and is one of the first<br />

concessions of the second round of<br />

sustainable forestry management<br />

concessions carried out by the Brazilian<br />

Forest Service.<br />

Supporting the government of Colombia in<br />

structuring and developing a ―window‖ to<br />

evaluate and screen private Second<br />

Generation Macroproyectos. This activity<br />

will provide important support to the<br />

government to successfully harness<br />

private sector interest in developing the<br />

approximately 7,000 hectares of land<br />

identified under the Macroproyectos<br />

program.<br />

Supporting the design and preparation of<br />

bidding documents for a performancebased<br />

contract with a private operator;<br />

preparing bidding documents for the<br />

supervision contract for the company in<br />

charge of monitoring the operator’s<br />

performance targets and the execution of<br />

the contract’s activities; and dissemination<br />

of the contract and bidding process<br />

documentation.<br />

Advising the government of Peru on how<br />

to improve the prospects for PPP in<br />

irrigation in the country in general and,<br />

more specifically, to provide<br />

recommendations on how to improve the<br />

Chavimochic PPP model in order to<br />

achieve a successful deal.<br />

Providing transaction assistance to the<br />

government of Uruguay to review existing<br />

road projects, assess their overall<br />

bankability, and identify and develop<br />

financial instruments for the PPP<br />

structure. This activity will provide<br />

guidance on how best to set up an<br />

appropriate and sustainable financial<br />

scheme for PPP agreements, including<br />

commercial and legal aspects.<br />

13<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$400,000<br />

$74,800<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

$74,975 Water<br />

$75,000 Water<br />

$250,000 Transport<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

SNTA Activities<br />

53. BELIZE: Improve<br />

Municipal<br />

Creditworthiness for<br />

Belize Municipalities<br />

54. COLOMBIA:<br />

Feasibility Study to<br />

Develop Tradable Air<br />

Rights Instruments to<br />

Mobilize Private<br />

Financing for Bogotá’s<br />

Carrera 7 Bus Rapid<br />

Transit Corridor<br />

55. MEXICO:<br />

Strengthening Lending<br />

Market for Small<br />

Mexican Municipalities<br />

Middle East and North Africa<br />

Assisting town and city councils implement<br />

the recommendations of the Municipal<br />

Finance and Revenue Enhancement<br />

Report. Using this diagnostic tool, and<br />

working with the Local Government Officer<br />

based in the Ministry of Local Government<br />

and Rural Development, this activity will<br />

support each of the councils to implement<br />

recommendations to improve their financial<br />

management systems, enhance their<br />

creditworthiness by increasing their<br />

revenue collection, and improve the<br />

efficiency of their expenditure.<br />

Analyzing the feasibility of developing and<br />

implementing a tradable air rights<br />

instrument to increase functional densities<br />

in zones adjacent to Bogotá’s Carrera 7<br />

―Green Corridor‖, and mobilize private<br />

sources of financing to the project.<br />

Assessing the development methodology<br />

of a credit risk model created by a Mexican<br />

non-bank financial institution for portfolio<br />

level analysis of a loan book. This activity<br />

will review the model's ability to predict<br />

ratings and map the model's outputs to a<br />

measure of probability of default and/or<br />

expected loss.<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

PPIAF Activities<br />

56. DJIBOUTI: Energy<br />

Sector Assessment<br />

57. DJIBOUTI:<br />

Feasibility Assessment<br />

for Solar Rural<br />

Electrification<br />

Assisting the government of Djibouti to<br />

refine its energy sector master plan,<br />

assessing the cost of refurbishing existing<br />

generation plants, and identifying least<br />

cost infrastructure investments that can be<br />

effectively financed and managed through<br />

a PPP.<br />

Analyzing the technical, economic and<br />

financial feasibility of rural electrification<br />

options to determine the most viable and<br />

sustainable roll-out option available to<br />

electrify each of 25 villages in Djibouti.<br />

14<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$75,000 Multi-sector<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

$179,780 Multi-sector Other<br />

$75,000 Multi-sector Other<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$459,275 Energy<br />

$400,600 Energy<br />

Specific<br />

performance<br />

improvement<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies


Country/Title Activity Description<br />

58. DJIBOUTI: Options<br />

for Telecoms Sector<br />

Liberalization in Djibouti<br />

59. LEBANON:<br />

Improving the<br />

Performance of the<br />

Beka’a Regional Water<br />

Authority<br />

60. MIDDLE EAST AND<br />

NORTH AFRICA:<br />

Developing Alternative<br />

Broadband Networks<br />

61. MIDDLE EAST AND<br />

NORTH AFRICA:<br />

Training Course on PPPs<br />

in the Water Sector<br />

62. WEST BANK AND<br />

GAZA: Southern West<br />

Bank Solid Waste<br />

Management Project<br />

Helping the government of Djibouti<br />

develop a strategy to transform the<br />

telecommunications sector into an engine<br />

of economic growth and employment.<br />

Strengthening the Beka'a Region Water<br />

Authority's engagement with the private<br />

sector and examining its current PPP to<br />

ensure the private operator is able to<br />

respond to the utility's needs in an efficient<br />

and cost-effective manner.<br />

Assessing the potential of activating<br />

installed unused fiber optic capacity in the<br />

region to form a regional backbone<br />

network.<br />

Conducting a training seminar to introduce<br />

PPPs to water sector professionals in the<br />

West Bank and Gaza, Iraq, and Jordan.<br />

This workshop will raise general<br />

awareness of the PPP process, its<br />

advantages and challenges, as well as<br />

financing modalities available for PPP<br />

development.<br />

Providing legal support for the<br />

development of a solid waste<br />

management PPP.<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

SNTA Activities<br />

63. LEBANON:<br />

Facilitating Sub-National<br />

Government Access to<br />

Commercial Credit and<br />

Capital Markets<br />

64. WEST BANK AND<br />

GAZA: Improving<br />

Municipal Revenue<br />

Generation Policies and<br />

Framework<br />

Conducting a quick diagnosis of the<br />

financial and administrative performance<br />

of the Al-Fayhaa Union of Municipalities,<br />

and the municipalities of Tripoli, Mina, and<br />

Beddawi. Key reforms to improve the<br />

municipalites' financial administration and<br />

increase access to capital markets will be<br />

identified.<br />

Formulating and implementing evidencebased<br />

policies and programs on municipal<br />

finance, with an emphasis on municipal<br />

revenue generation.<br />

15<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$107,690 Telecom<br />

$75,000 Water<br />

$74,510 Telecom<br />

$50,000 Water<br />

$199,975 Water<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$75,000<br />

$161,300<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Pioneering<br />

Transactions<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

Specific<br />

performance<br />

improvement<br />

Specific<br />

performance<br />

improvement


South Asia<br />

Country/Title Activity Description<br />

PPIAF Activities<br />

65. BHUTAN: Prefeasibility<br />

Assessment of<br />

Infrastructure Projects<br />

Under a PPP Model<br />

66. BHUTAN: Telecom<br />

Sector Policy Roadmap<br />

67. INDIA: Assistance in<br />

Finalization of a PPP<br />

Policy<br />

68. MALDIVES:<br />

Contract Management<br />

Support for Solid Waste<br />

Management PPP<br />

69. NEPAL: Screening<br />

and Initial Feasibility<br />

Assessment of Potential<br />

Private-Public<br />

Infrastructure Projects<br />

70. SRI LANKA:<br />

Identifying PPP<br />

Opportunities for Local<br />

Governments<br />

71. SRI LANKA: Prefeasibility<br />

Assessment of<br />

Infrastructure Projects<br />

under a PPP Model<br />

Supporting the Royal Government of<br />

Bhutan in the preliminary assessment of<br />

potential infrastructure projects to develop<br />

a pipeline of feasible PPP transactions,<br />

including preparing a preliminary<br />

assessment of the feasibility of several<br />

infrastructure projects by providing<br />

assistance for pre-feasibility studies.<br />

Developing a strategic policy roadmap to<br />

guide the development of Bhutan's<br />

telecom sector on introduction of<br />

competition, divestment by the existing<br />

operators, and government transformation<br />

agenda to use the telecom sector for costeffective<br />

service delivery.<br />

Developing a PPP policy framework to<br />

clarify existing guidelines and create new<br />

policies on developing, contracting, and<br />

managing PPPs.<br />

Providing management contract support to<br />

Male City Council to structure and<br />

implement a viable tariff structure for<br />

waste management services, develop a<br />

mechanism for tariff collection, develop an<br />

information system to maintain user data,<br />

and monitor the performance of the<br />

concessionaire.<br />

Identifying potential projects in the urban<br />

and transport sector that are suitable for<br />

financing under the private-public<br />

partnership. This activity will assist the<br />

government in deciding modalities for<br />

future investments in these sectors.<br />

Developing the capacity of the Ministry of<br />

Economic Development and selected<br />

Provincial and Local Governments in Sri<br />

Lanka to identify the potential for private<br />

participation in infrastructure development.<br />

This activity will also develop a prioritized<br />

list of possible projects that could then be<br />

translated into PPP transactions with<br />

further support in the future.<br />

Supporting the government of Sri Lanka in<br />

the preliminary assessment of potential<br />

infrastructure projects to develop a<br />

pipeline of feasible PPP transactions.<br />

16<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$64,450<br />

Sector Action Area<br />

Multisector<br />

$75,000 Telecom<br />

$75,000<br />

Multisector<br />

$74,950 Water<br />

$50,000<br />

$75,000<br />

$75,000<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Policy,<br />

regulatory, and<br />

institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Strategies


PPIAF and SNTA Total Funding in Q1-Q3 FY2012 vs. Q1-Q3 FY2011—Regional and Sectoral Split<br />

PPIAF and SNTA Funding Approved in Q1-Q3 FY2012<br />

PPIAF SNTA<br />

FY2012<br />

FY2012<br />

Total Count by Region: Total $ by Region<br />

Total $ by Region:<br />

Total Count by Region:<br />

AFRICA 27 46% AFRICA $3,409,435 41% AFRICA $519,745 42% AFRICA 5 42%<br />

CROSS-REGIONAL 0 0% CROSS-REGIONAL $0 0% EAP $150,000 12% EAP 2 17%<br />

EAP 4 7% EAP $420,620 5% ECA $0 0% ECA 0 0%<br />

ECA 6 10% ECA $773,100 9% GLOBAL $0 0% GLOBAL 0 0%<br />

GLOBAL 3 5% GLOBAL $933,000 11% LAC $329,780 27% LAC 3 25%<br />

LAC 5 8% LAC $874,775 11% MENA $236,300 19% MENA 2 17%<br />

MENA 7 12% MENA $1,367,050 17% SAR $0 0% SAR 0 0%<br />

SAR 7 12% SAR $489,400 6% Total $1,235,825 100% Total 12 100%<br />

Total 59 100% Total $8,267,380 100%<br />

Total $ by Sector:<br />

Total Count by Sector:<br />

Total Count by Sector Total $ by Sector<br />

ENERGY $46,750 4% ENERGY 1 8%<br />

ENERGY 14 24% ENERGY $2,552,415 31% MULTI $1,189,075 96% MULTI 11 92%<br />

MULTI 17 29% MULTI $2,324,584 28% TELECOM $0 0% TELECOM 0 0%<br />

TELECOM 8 14% TELECOM $1,212,080 15% TRANSPORT $0 0% TRANSPORT 0 0%<br />

TRANSPORT 7 12% TRANSPORT $1,054,820 13% WATER $0 0% WATER 0 0%<br />

WATER 13 22% WATER $1,123,481 14% Total $1,235,825 100% Total 12 100%<br />

Total 59 100% Total $8,267,380 100%<br />

PPIAF and SNTA Funding Approved in Q1-Q3 FY2011 (as comparison)<br />

PPIAF SNTA<br />

FY2011<br />

FY2011<br />

Total Count by Region: Total $ by Region<br />

Total $ by Region:<br />

Total Count by Region:<br />

AFRICA 12 34% AFRICA $1,044,880 31% AFRICA $146,005 18% AFRICA 1 20%<br />

CROSS-REGIONAL 1 3% CROSS-REGIONAL $300,000 9% EAP $0 0% EAP 0 0%<br />

EAP 3 9% EAP $176,800 5% ECA $0 0% ECA 0 0%<br />

ECA 5 14% ECA $485,450 14% GLOBAL $0 0% GLOBAL 0 0%<br />

GLOBAL 2 6% GLOBAL $111,925 3% LAC $595,950 73% LAC 3 60%<br />

LAC 1 3% LAC $249,484 7% MENA $0 0% MENA 0 0%<br />

MENA 5 14% MENA $649,960 19% SAR $75,000 9% SAR 1 20%<br />

SAR 6 17% SAR $385,640 11% Total $816,955 100% Total 5 100%<br />

Total 35 100% Total $3,404,139 100%<br />

Total $ by Sector: Total Count by Sector:<br />

Total Count by Sector Total $ by Sector<br />

ENERGY $0 0% ENERGY 0 0%<br />

ENERGY 7 20% ENERGY $614,500 18% MULTI $741,955 91% MULTI 4 80%<br />

MULTI 11 31% MULTI $1,072,600 32% TELECOM $0 0% TELECOM 0 0%<br />

TELECOM 3 9% TELECOM $314,760 9% TRANSPORT $0 0% TRANSPORT 0 0%<br />

TRANSPORT 8 23% TRANSPORT $845,784 25% WATER $75,000 9% WATER 1 20%<br />

WATER 6 17% WATER $556,495 16% Total $816,955 100% Total 5 100%<br />

Total 35 100% Total $3,404,139 100%


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

Status of PPIAF Approved Activities Inception to Date<br />

One thousand twenty-eight activities worth over $209 million approved since inception<br />

A. PPIAF has approved 1,028 projects since inception, including 74 projects under the Sub-National Technical Assistance<br />

(SNTA) program, for a total of $209,885,159. A breakdown of the PPIAF and SNTA activities is presented in Table<br />

1 below.<br />

Table 1: Funding Source for PPIAF Activities<br />

July 1999 to March 2012<br />

Source Number of Activities Value (USD)<br />

PPIAF Activities 954 192,207,662<br />

SNTA Activities 74 17,677,497<br />

Total 1,028 209,885,159<br />

B. The geographic focus of the 954 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 2. The largest share of funding has gone<br />

to Africa, representing 35 percent of the approved projects, with a value of $66.7 million. In the SNTA window, summarized in<br />

Table 3, Africa dominates the portfolio, representing 34 percent of the approved projects, with a value of $5.9 million.<br />

Table 2: Geographic Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />

Region Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

Table 3: Geographic Focus of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No.<br />

of Projects<br />

Africa 66,686,445 35 309 32<br />

East Asia & the Pacifi c 30,319,827 16 141 15<br />

Eastern Europe & Central Asia 25,010,815 13 114 12<br />

Global 19,823,014 10 110 12<br />

South Asia 19,713,074 10 118 12<br />

Latin America & the Caribbean 18,895,157 10 100 10<br />

Middle East & North Africa 10,079,330 5 59 6<br />

Cross-Regional 1,680,000 1 3 1<br />

Total 192,207,662 100 954 100<br />

Region Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No.<br />

of Projects<br />

Africa 5,910,410 34 24 31<br />

Latin America & the Caribbean 5,885,147 33 22 30<br />

East Asia & the Pacifi c 1,959,000 11 10 14<br />

South Asia 1,627,850 9 6 8<br />

Eastern Europe & Central Asia 1,134,340 7 5 7<br />

Global Knowledge 924,450 5 5 7<br />

Middle East & North Africa 236,300 1 2 3<br />

Total 17,677,497 100 74 100


C. The sectoral focus of the 954 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 4. Multi-sector activities accounted for the<br />

largest share, representing funding of over $66 million.<br />

Table 4: Sectoral Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />

Sector Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

D. The primary action areas of the 954 approved PPIAF activities are summarized in Table 51. The primary action areas of the<br />

74 SNTA activities are summarized in Table 6.<br />

Table 5: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />

Table 6: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No.<br />

of Projects<br />

Multi-sector 66,110,561 35 345 37<br />

Energy 42,666,890 22 191 20<br />

Water & sanitation 35,416,441 19 186 19<br />

Transport 31,572,385 16 152 16<br />

Telecommunications 16,441,385 9 80 8<br />

Total 192,207,662 100 954 100<br />

Action Area Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

Infrastructure development<br />

strategies<br />

Policy, regulatory, and institutional<br />

reforms<br />

Action Area Total Funding<br />

(USD)<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

% by<br />

Funding<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

% by No.<br />

of Projects<br />

74,824,776 39 341 35<br />

53,024,077 28 235 25<br />

Capacity building 23,938,994 12 148 15<br />

Emerging best practice 17,961,325 9 114 12<br />

Pioneering transactions 14,302,401 7 53 5<br />

Consensus building 7,824,365 4 64 7<br />

Other 775,000 1 1 1<br />

Total 192,207,662 100 954 100<br />

% by No.<br />

of Projects<br />

Financing 7,628,000 43 28 38<br />

Credit ratings 4,026,006 23 12 16<br />

Specifi c performance improvement 4,001,646 23 20 27<br />

Other 2,021,845 11 14 19<br />

Total 17,677,497 100 74 100<br />

1 In practice, many approved activities from the PPIAF funds comprise actions that correspond to two or more of these specifi c categories.<br />

The breakdown above is based on the PMU’s judgment as to the primary focus of each approved activity, and should thus be treated as<br />

indicative only.<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org


PPIAF Work Program 2011–2013<br />

Overarching Goal: Eliminate Poverty and Achieve Sustainable Development<br />

December 2010<br />

PPIAF’s ultimate objective is to support poverty reduction by facilitating private ownership and<br />

management and/or financing of infrastructure service delivery, which plays a critical role in economic<br />

growth. However, effective private sector participation in infrastructure poses considerable challenges for<br />

governments in developing countries, which usually face limits on their administrative capacity and other<br />

resources, and often face greater hurdles in addressing investor perceptions regarding the credibility of<br />

their transaction processes and regulatory frameworks. PPIAF was created to assist governments in<br />

removing these hurdles to private investment.<br />

PPIAF Work Program 2011–2013<br />

To better target its technical assistance, PPIAF has developed a work program to be implemented over<br />

the 2011–2013 period, structured around three strategic pillars and cross-cutting themes. These strategic<br />

pillars logically group several key development priorities identified by PPIAF’s donors, reflect the “special<br />

themes” identified for IDA 16, and organize by themes the technical assistance that has been provided by<br />

PPIAF to date and its priorities for future work.<br />

Pillar #1 Pillar #2 Pillar #3<br />

Sectors Universal Access Climate Change Urbanization<br />

Power<br />

Water<br />

Transport<br />

Telecom<br />

Irrigation<br />

Crosscutting<br />

Themes<br />

Meeting the rural<br />

electrification challenge with<br />

PPPs<br />

Helping public and private<br />

operators improve access to<br />

water in peri-urban and rural<br />

areas<br />

Using performance-based<br />

PPP contracts to design,<br />

build, and maintain highways<br />

and roads, particularly rural<br />

and peri-urban roads<br />

Supporting regulators in<br />

promoting telecom service<br />

extensions in rural areas<br />

Facilitating irrigation PPPs in<br />

areas with high potential for<br />

agricultural output<br />

improvement<br />

Using PPPs to promote<br />

energy efficiency and<br />

renewable energy<br />

Structuring dedicated<br />

adaptation and mitigation<br />

PPPs in water and<br />

wastewater<br />

Reducing, controlling, or<br />

re<strong>cover</strong>ing costs from<br />

vehicle use via toll roads,<br />

light rail, and bus systems<br />

Ensuring that private<br />

provision of telecom<br />

services is fully prepared for<br />

harsh weather problems<br />

Using PPPs to “climateproof”<br />

irrigation facilities to<br />

guard against harsh<br />

weather availability<br />

Sub-National Technical Assistance<br />

Fragile States<br />

Regional Integration<br />

Capacity Building<br />

Helping power utilities<br />

access finance and<br />

expertise to improve urban<br />

services<br />

Helping water utilities access<br />

finance and expertise for<br />

service expansion and<br />

rehabilitation<br />

Facilitating PPPs and<br />

access to financing by<br />

municipal transport agencies<br />

and authorities<br />

Working with regulators to<br />

promote broadband services<br />

in urban areas<br />

Exploring the role of SMEs<br />

in management of smallscale<br />

peri-urban irrigation


Strategic Pillars:<br />

Universal Access. To assist governments expand access to basic infrastructure services. Technical<br />

assistance will use innovative approaches to scale up access to services to underserved populations.<br />

Climate Change. To facilitate private financing and PPP arrangements that contribute to infrastructurerelated<br />

climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. That the private sector must play a role in these<br />

efforts is widely acknowledged, but the actual modalities and mechanisms have rarely been discussed in<br />

detail. PPIAF’s expertise can help structure arrangements for private support in the basic infrastructure<br />

sectors.<br />

Facilitating Urbanization. To help governments cope with the infrastructure needs associated with rapid<br />

urbanization. The work will focus on helping municipal governments and utilities develop their capacity to<br />

access private expertise and financing in order to extend and improve urban services. Financing might be<br />

accessed directly via banks or bond markets, or indirectly via PPP arrangements along with private sector<br />

expertise.<br />

Cross-cutting Themes:<br />

Sub-National Finance. PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program now has three<br />

years of successful experience in helping sub-national entities improve their creditworthiness to access<br />

market-based financing without sovereign guarantees. The value of the program is as a means to<br />

increase the funds available for improved and increased infrastructure services in all sectors and across<br />

all three of PPIAF’s strategic pillars.<br />

Fragile States. Weak institutions and high risks of conflict constrain national poverty reduction and<br />

service delivery in many fragile states. Strengthening assistance to these kinds of countries is emerging<br />

as a new PPIAF priority. While all fragile states are characterized by weak policies and institutions,<br />

country context varies considerably and efforts to attract the private sector to such countries must be<br />

carefully designed to take this into account. PPPs may not be easily feasible in many fragile states, but<br />

legal/regulatory/policy reforms are often possible and can represent first steps on the road to improved<br />

infrastructure service provision through private participation.<br />

Regional Integration. Many of the poorest developing countries, particularly those in Africa, are too<br />

small to attract private investors or operators. For example, the 40 IPP projects in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

average just over 90 MW in size, far below the 200 MW threshold commonly considered to be the<br />

minimum size for cost-effective PPPs of this kind. Regional integration enables smaller countries to join<br />

forces to develop projects of sufficient scale to attract private sector interest, as well as to have strong<br />

positive regional impacts in terms of trade facilitation and economic development.<br />

Capacity Building. The provision of capacity building for decision makers and technical staff in<br />

developing countries is critical to help them understand the benefits of increased private sector<br />

participation for improved service provision, to develop specific infrastructure projects with appropriate<br />

types and degrees of risk allocation, and to negotiate directly with the private sector the terms of the PPP<br />

agreements.


April 2012<br />

Activities Approved in Q1-Q3 of FY2012, Classified in Accordance with PPIAF’s<br />

Work Program 2011–2013<br />

The table below contains the activities approved during the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, classified in<br />

accordance with the three strategic pillars and four cross-cutting themes of PPIAF’s 2011–2013 Work<br />

Program.<br />

Pillar #1 Pillar #2 Pillar #3<br />

Sectors Universal Access Climate Change Urbanization<br />

Power<br />

Water<br />

� Burundi Pipeline Screening and<br />

Feasibility Assessment of PPPs<br />

in the Energy Sector<br />

� Djibouti Energy Sector<br />

Assessment<br />

� Lighting Africa Expansion<br />

� Mozambique Preparation of a<br />

Gas Sector Master Plan<br />

� Niger Evaluation of Rural<br />

Energy Projects with Private<br />

Sector Participation (PSP)<br />

� Nigeria Support for PSP in the<br />

Power Sector<br />

� South Sudan Power Distribution<br />

System Diagnostic<br />

� Armenia Supporting an<br />

Enhanced Management<br />

Contract for Water and<br />

Sanitation Services<br />

� Cameroon Support to Water<br />

Sector<br />

� Lebanon Improving Water Utility<br />

Performance<br />

� Maldives Contract Management<br />

Support for Solid Waste<br />

Management PPP<br />

� Nigeria Workshop on Water<br />

Utility Reform<br />

� Panama Preparation of a<br />

Performance-Based Efficiency<br />

Improvement Contract for<br />

IDAAN’s Colón Business Unit<br />

� West Bank and Gaza Solid<br />

Waste Management Project<br />

� Albania Technical<br />

Assessments of Bistrica 1,<br />

Bistrica 2, Ulza, and<br />

Shkopeti Hydropower Plants<br />

� Brazil Improving the<br />

Sustainable Forestry<br />

Concession Model in the<br />

Amazon<br />

� Djibouti Feasibility<br />

Assessment for Solar Rural<br />

Electrification<br />

� Kenya Lake Turkana Wind<br />

Due Diligence Project<br />

� Mali Capacity Building and<br />

Legal Advisory Support to<br />

the Scatec and Kenie<br />

Projects<br />

� Colombia Private Financing<br />

for Low-Income Housing<br />

Projects<br />

� Ghana Institutional Options<br />

for Improving Urban Water<br />

Supply


Pillar #1 Pillar #2 Pillar #3<br />

Sectors Universal Access Climate Change Urbanization<br />

Transport<br />

Telecom<br />

Irrigation<br />

Multisector<br />

� Albania Advisory Support for<br />

Private Sector Involvement in<br />

Operation of Regional Bus<br />

Stations<br />

� Guinea Mining Ancillary<br />

Infrastructure<br />

� Laos Transport Sector Enabling<br />

Environment Assessment and<br />

Pipeline Screening<br />

� South Africa Pre-feasibility<br />

Study for Johannesburg Cycling<br />

Program<br />

� Uruguay Financing Options for<br />

Road PPPs<br />

� Vietnam Strengthening<br />

Performance-Based Contracts<br />

for Road Maintenance<br />

� Albania ICT Universal Access<br />

and Service Policy Framework<br />

� Bhutan Telecom Sector Policy<br />

Roadmap<br />

� Comoros Telecom Options<br />

Evaluation and Strategic<br />

Roadmap<br />

� Djibouti Options for Telecoms<br />

Sector<br />

� Lesotho Legal Advisory Support<br />

to ICT and Facilities<br />

Management PPP<br />

� Moldova Feasibility Study for<br />

Cloud-Based Shared<br />

Infrastructure PPP<br />

� Vietnam Feasibility Study and<br />

PPP Options for a Nation-wide<br />

e-ID System for the Delivery of<br />

Public Services<br />

� Peru PPP Options for Irrigation<br />

Infrastructure<br />

� Philippines Options to Expand<br />

PSP in the Irrigation Sector<br />

� Bhutan Pre-feasibility<br />

Assessment of PPP Projects<br />

� India Assistance in the<br />

Finalization of a PPP Policy<br />

� Mali Supporting an Enabling<br />

Environment for PSP in the<br />

Electricity and Water Sectors<br />

� Nepal Screening and Initial<br />

Feasibility Assessment of<br />

Potential PPP Projects<br />

� Sri Lanka Pre-feasibility<br />

Assessment of PPPs<br />

� Tajikistan Drafting a New<br />

Investment Law<br />

2


Crosscutting<br />

Themes<br />

Sub-National Technical Assistance:<br />

� Africa Regional Capacity Building Workshop on Revenue Management<br />

� Belize Improve Municipal Creditworthiness for Municipalities<br />

� Burkina Faso Strengthening Fiscal Revenues for the Municipality of Ouagadougou<br />

� Colombia Feasibility Study for Tradable Air Rights Instruments for Bus Rapid Transit Corridor<br />

� Ghana Increasing Access to Market-Based Financing for Municipalities in the Greater Accra Area<br />

� Indonesia Jakarta Credit Rating<br />

� Kenya Assessment of Geothermal Development Company for Enhanced Access to Finance<br />

� Lebanon Facilitating Sub-National Government Access to Commercial Credit and Capital Markets<br />

� Mauritania Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Study for the Communauté Urbaine de<br />

Nouakchott<br />

� Mexico Strengthening Lending Market for Small Municipalities<br />

� Philippines Assisting Tanuan City in Enhancing the City’s Creditworthiness<br />

� West Bank and Gaza Improving Municipal Revenue Generation Policies and Framework<br />

Fragile States * :<br />

� Burundi Pipeline Screening and Feasibility Assessment of PPPs in the Energy Sector<br />

� Comoros Options Evaluation and Strategic Roadmap for the Telecommunications Sector<br />

� Côte d’Ivoire Improving Users’ Awareness on Cost Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

� Côte d’Ivoire PPP Pipeline and Enabling Environment Support<br />

� Guinea-Bissau PPP Training Workshop<br />

� Guinea Mining Ancillary Infrastructure<br />

� Guinea PPP Training Workshop<br />

� Nepal Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of Potential PPP Projects<br />

� South Sudan Power Distribution System Diagnostic<br />

� West Bank and Gaza Solid Waste Management Project<br />

� Zimbabwe Assessment of Enabling Environment and PPP Pipeline<br />

Regional Integration:<br />

� Africa Legal Services in Support of the West African Power Pool’s Inter-connector Project for Côte<br />

d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea<br />

� Middle East and North Africa Developing Alternative Broadband Networks<br />

Capacity Building:<br />

� Africa Energy Ministers’ Conference<br />

� Africa Regional Conference on PPPs in Water and Sanitation<br />

� Gabon PPP Program<br />

� Leaders in Urban Transport Program<br />

� PPI Database Funding for FY12 and FY13<br />

� The Governance of Basic Local Public Services – 3 rd Global Report on Decentralization and Local<br />

Democracy<br />

� Middle East and North Africa Training Course on PPPs in the Water Sector<br />

� Rwanda Capacity Training for Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project<br />

� Sri Lanka Identifying PPP Opportunities for Local Governments<br />

* Several of the activities listed in the cross-cutting theme Fragile States appear among the three strategic pillars<br />

3


Activities Approved in Q1, Q2, and Q3 of Fiscal 2012<br />

The table below contains the activities approved during the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, classified in<br />

by region.<br />

Region Country/Title<br />

4<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Sector Nature of Activity<br />

AFR Africa: African Energy Ministers’ Conference $40,000 Energy Capacity Building<br />

AFR<br />

Africa: Legal Services in Support of the West African<br />

Power Pool’s Power Inter-connector Project<br />

AFR Africa: Lighting Africa Expansion $250,000 Energy<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

Africa: Regional Capacity Building Workshop with<br />

Agence Française de Développement on Revenue<br />

Management<br />

Africa: Regional Conference on PPPs in Water and<br />

Sanitation, Sub-Saharan Africa; Dakar, Senegal<br />

Burkina Faso: Strengthening of Fiscal Revenues for<br />

the Municipality of Ouagadougou<br />

Burundi: Project Pipeline Screening and Initial<br />

Feasibility Assessment of Potential Infrastructure<br />

PPPs in the Energy Sector<br />

$70,800 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />

$75,000<br />

Multisector<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Specific Performance<br />

Improvement<br />

$50,000 Water Emerging Best Practices<br />

$75,000<br />

Multisector<br />

AFR Cameroon: Support to the Cameroon Water Sector $40,000 Water<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

Comoros: Options Evaluation and Strategic Roadmap<br />

for the Telecommunications Sector of the Union of<br />

Comoros<br />

Côte d’Ivoire: Improving Users’ Awareness on Cost<br />

Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable Infrastructure Development $67,438<br />

Côte d’Ivoire: PPP Pipeline and Enabling Environment<br />

Support<br />

Financing<br />

$74,500 Energy Capacity Building<br />

$75,000 Telecom<br />

$74,640<br />

AFR Gabon: PPP Program in Gabon $74,640<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

Ghana: Increasing Access to Market-Based Financing<br />

for Municipalities in the Greater Accra Area<br />

Ghana: Institutional options for improving urban water<br />

supply in Ghana (phase 2)<br />

$175,000<br />

AFR Guinea-Bissau: PPP Training Workshop $49,963<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

$68,431 Water<br />

Multisector<br />

AFR Guinea: Mining Ancillary Infrastructure $490,000 Transport<br />

AFR Guinea: PPP Training Workshop $57,763<br />

AFR<br />

Kenya: Assessment of Geothermal Development<br />

Company for Enhanced Access to Finance<br />

Multisector<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms<br />

Financing<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms<br />

Capacity Building<br />

$46,750 Energy Financing<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies


Region Country/Title<br />

5<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Sector Nature of Activity<br />

AFR Kenya: Lake Turkana Wind Due Diligence Project $294,900 Energy Capacity Building<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

Lesotho: Legal Advisory Support to ICT and Facilities<br />

Management PPP<br />

Mali: Capacity Building Support to Scatec and Kenie<br />

Projects<br />

Mali: Improving Governance and accountability to<br />

Foster an Enabling Environment for Private Sector<br />

Participation in the Electricity and Water Sectors<br />

Mali: Legal Advisory to the Government of Mali for the<br />

Scatec Solar Project<br />

Mauritania: PEFA Study for the Communauté Urbaine<br />

de Nouakchott<br />

Mozambique: Preparation of a Gas Sector Master<br />

Plan<br />

Niger: Evaluation of projects with private participation<br />

for Electricity Production and Supply of Energy<br />

Services in Rural Areas<br />

Nigeria: Support for Private Development of the<br />

Power Sector<br />

$301,160 Telecom Pioneering Transactions<br />

$49,890 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />

$74,890<br />

Multisector<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms<br />

$49,950 Energy Capacity Building<br />

$147,995<br />

$250,000<br />

$60,000<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

Specific Performance<br />

Improvement<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

$402,500 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />

AFR Nigeria: Workshop on Water Utility Reform $32,450 Water Capacity Building<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

AFR<br />

Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project—Technical<br />

Assistance and Capacity Training<br />

South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling<br />

Program in the City of Johannesburg<br />

South Sudan: Diagnostic of Power Distribution<br />

System<br />

Zimbabwe: Assessment of PPP Enabling<br />

Environment and PPP Pipeline<br />

$207,700 Water Capacity Building<br />

$74,820<br />

Multi-<br />

Sector<br />

$75,000 Energy<br />

$53,000<br />

EAP Indonesia: Jakarta Credit Rating $75,000<br />

EAP<br />

EAP<br />

EAP<br />

EAP<br />

EAP<br />

Laos: Transport Sector Enabling Environment<br />

Assessment and Pipeline Screening<br />

Philippines: Assisting Tanuan City in Enhancing the<br />

City’s Creditworthiness<br />

Philippines: Options to Expand Private Sector<br />

Participation in the Development of the Irrigation<br />

Sector<br />

Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the<br />

Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID System for the<br />

Delivery of Public Services<br />

Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-<br />

Based Contracts for Road Maintenance in Vietnam<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

$50,000 Transport<br />

$75,000<br />

Multisector<br />

$100,000 Water<br />

Pioneering Transactions<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Credit Rating<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Specific Performance<br />

Improvement<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

$230,620 Telecom Emerging Best Practice<br />

$40,000 Transport<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies


Region Country/Title<br />

ECA<br />

ECA<br />

ECA<br />

ECA<br />

ECA<br />

ECA<br />

Global<br />

Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica<br />

2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower Plants<br />

Albania: Universal Access and Service Policy<br />

Framework in the ICT Sector<br />

Armenia: Advisory Support for Private Sector<br />

Involvement in Operation of Regional Bus Stations<br />

Armenia: Support to the Armenia Water and<br />

Sewerage Company with the Design of the Enhanced<br />

Management Contract for 2011–2013<br />

Moldova: Feasibility Study for Cloud-Based Shared<br />

Infrastructure PPP<br />

Tajikistan: Drafting a new Investment Law in<br />

Tajikistan<br />

Global: Leaders in Urban Transport Program –<br />

Translation and Workshop Delivery<br />

6<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

Sector Nature of Activity<br />

$75,000 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />

$148,100 Telecom<br />

$75,000 Transport<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

$75,000 Water Pioneering Transaction<br />

$200,000 Telecom<br />

$200,000<br />

Multisector<br />

Global Global: PPI Database Funding for FY12 and FY13 $658,000 Multisector<br />

Global<br />

LAC<br />

LAC<br />

LAC<br />

LAC<br />

LAC<br />

LAC<br />

Global: The Governance of Basic Local Public<br />

Services – 3 rd Global Report on Decentralization and<br />

Local Democracy (GOLD III)<br />

Belize: Improve Municipal Creditworthiness for Belize<br />

Municipalities<br />

Brazil: Improving the Sustainable Forestry<br />

Concession Model in the Amazon<br />

Colombia: Feasibility Study to Develop Tradable Air<br />

Rights Instruments to Mobilize Private Financing for<br />

Bogotá’s Carrera 7 Bus Rapid Transit Corridor<br />

Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income<br />

Housing Projects<br />

Mexico: Strengthening Lending Market for Small<br />

Mexican Municipalities<br />

Panama: Preparation of a Performance-Based<br />

Efficiency Improvement Contract for IDAAN’s Colón<br />

Business Unit<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms<br />

$75,000 Transport Capacity Building<br />

$200,000<br />

$75,000<br />

$400,000<br />

$179,780<br />

$74,800<br />

$75,000<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

LAC Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure $75,000 Water<br />

LAC<br />

Uruguay: Development of Financing Options for PPPs<br />

in Roads Sector<br />

Consensus Building<br />

Consensus Building<br />

Specific Performance<br />

Improvement<br />

Pioneering Transactions<br />

Other<br />

Pioneering Transactions<br />

Other<br />

$74,975 Water Pioneering Transactions<br />

$250,000 Transport<br />

MENA Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment $459,275 Energy<br />

MENA<br />

MENA<br />

Djibouti: Feasibility Assessment for Solar Rural<br />

Electrification<br />

Djibouti: Options for Telecoms Sector Liberalization in<br />

Djibouti<br />

$400,600 Energy<br />

$107,690 Telecom<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms


Region Country/Title<br />

MENA<br />

MENA<br />

MENA<br />

MENA<br />

MENA<br />

MENA<br />

SAR<br />

Lebanon: Facilitating Sub-National Government<br />

Access to Commercial Credit and Capital Markets<br />

Lebanon: Improving the Performance of the Beka’a<br />

regional Water Authority<br />

Middle East and North Africa: Developing Alternative<br />

Broadband Networks<br />

Middle East and North Africa: Training Course on<br />

PPPs in the Water Sector<br />

West Bank and Gaza: Improving Municipal Revenue<br />

Generation Policies and Framework<br />

West Bank and Gaza: Southern West Bank Solid<br />

Waste Management Project<br />

Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure<br />

Projects Under a PPP Model<br />

7<br />

Approved<br />

Funding<br />

$75,000<br />

Sector Nature of Activity<br />

Multisector<br />

$75,000 Water<br />

$74,510 Telecom<br />

Capacity Building<br />

Specific Performance<br />

Improvement<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

$50,000 Water Building Capacity<br />

$161,300<br />

Multisector<br />

Specific Performance<br />

Improvement<br />

$199,975 Water Pioneering Transactions<br />

$64,450<br />

Multisector<br />

SAR Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap $75,000 Telecom<br />

SAR India: Assistance in Finalization of a PPP Policy $75,000<br />

SAR<br />

SAR<br />

SAR<br />

SAR<br />

Maldives: Contract Management Support for Solid<br />

Waste Management PPP<br />

Nepal: Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of<br />

Potential Public-Private Infrastructure Projects<br />

Sri Lanka: Identifying PPP Opportunities for Local<br />

Governments<br />

Sri Lanka: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure<br />

Projects Under a PPP Model<br />

Multisector<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms<br />

Policy, Regulatory, and<br />

Institutional Reforms<br />

$74,950 Water Capacity Building<br />

$50,000<br />

$75,000<br />

$75,000<br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector <br />

Multisector<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development Strategies<br />

Other<br />

Capacity Building


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

REGIONAL UPDATE<br />

PPIAF’S WORK IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA<br />

April 2012<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)’s economies have improved markedly over the past decade.<br />

The continent’s real GDP grew by roughly 5% per year from 2000 to 2008, reaching<br />

$1.56 trillion in 2008 prior to the financial crisis, at a similar level to the GDP of China.<br />

Although the financial crisis slowed the economic boom, SSA has showed significant<br />

resilience, and economic growth climbed back to 5% in 2011. This growth story has<br />

been built on sound macro-economic principles that have reduced inflation from the<br />

highs of the 1990s, brought about tax reforms and the privatization of state assets, and<br />

energized the market through private-sector friendly policies and sector strategies.<br />

Nevertheless, many SSA countries continue to face serious infrastructure deficits that<br />

negatively impact economic growth across the continent. As a result, many of the<br />

region’s governments are recognizing that mobilizing the required investment to<br />

support the development of infrastructure will be a major challenge. To address<br />

this, governments are looking to engage the private sector through public-private<br />

partnership (PPP) arrangements to close the gaps in investment capital, technology,<br />

and know-how needed to improve the efficiency and delivery of public infrastructure<br />

services. Requests for PPIAF assistance in the region continue to be high, as governments<br />

seek support to help develop the appropriate enabling environment for private sector<br />

participation, as well as the knowledge and expertise to develop and implement<br />

bankable PPP projects.<br />

As of March 31, 2012 PPIAF had provided $72,596,855 in funding to 333 projects in<br />

SSA, representing 35% of PPIAF’s total funding portfolio. The region continues to<br />

be the largest recipient of PPIAF assistance, and in fiscal 2012 activities in SSA have<br />

represented 41% of the total portfolio. Since inception, the most frequent recipients<br />

of PPIAF assistance have been Kenya, Mozambique, and Nigeria. While support to<br />

these countries will continue, the portfolio is also diversifying to support fragile and<br />

conflict-affected countries such as Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and South<br />

Sudan. On a sectoral basis, energy activities represent 55% of PPIAF’s ongoing portfolio<br />

in the region, followed by 17% for multi-sector activities, and 12% for water sector<br />

activities.


It is estimated that inadequate infrastructure across SSA is slowing GDP growth by around 2%. Governments in the<br />

region face a serious challenge of increasing the quality and quantity of infrastructure service provision to sustain and<br />

enhance economic growth rates in the context of narrow fi scal space to fund these investments. A sizeable funding<br />

gap exists, which governments and donors are unable to fi ll alone. The PPIAF-sponsored African Infrastructure<br />

Country Diagnostic found that the continent needs to spend about $93 billion per year over the next ten years, 15%<br />

of the region’s GDP, to plug the infrastructure gap. The report also estimated current spending at only $45 billion a<br />

year, demonstrating the size of the funding gap. For this reason, PPIAF assistance has been highly requested to help<br />

governments leverage private sector management expertise and/or fi nancing to expand and improve infrastructure<br />

services.<br />

As is often noted, the infrastructure gap is most acute in the power sector, where chronic power shortages in many<br />

of the region’s countries signifi cantly impact economic activity and growth. Although the sector is already the second<br />

largest recipient of private sector investment across the continent, it is estimated that SSA spends only around one<br />

quarter of the amount needed to fulfi ll demand. Thus the power generation capacity of the entire continent, populated<br />

by 800 million people, is comparable with that of Spain, with a population of only 45 million.<br />

Clearly the private sector will play a signifi cant role in building Africa’s power generation potential, and PPIAF has<br />

provided support to several projects in the region with this goal in mind. In Nigeria, PPIAF approved an activity that<br />

will support the government in reaching its Vision 2020 goal of increasing the country’s generation capacity from<br />

3,000 MW to 40,000 MW by 2020 by facilitating private sector investment in Independent Power Producers (IPPs).<br />

PPIAF is supporting the due diligence of proposed IPPs to ensure that the projects meet internationally established<br />

benchmarks for proposed technology and cost effi ciency. It is hoped that the IPPs that will be examined as part of<br />

the activity will provide additional generation capacity of more than 2,500 MW. Similarly, in Kenya PPIAF is providing<br />

technical, commercial, legal, and fi nancial expertise to the Kenya Power Company to support the development of<br />

the €600 million Lake Turkana Wind Project, including the negotiation of the Power Purchase Agreement with the<br />

private operator. When completed the 300 MW Lake Turkana wind power generation facility is expected to represent<br />

17% of Kenya’s installed capacity.<br />

Several countries in Africa are rich in natural resources, and as these countries attempt to embark into a sustainable<br />

development path, a key question arises of how to integrate the infrastructure assets (e.g., roads and power) created<br />

to serve mining companies into the policies and plans that aim to improve the provision of infrastructure nation-wide.<br />

In recognizing the increasing importance of this question for African countries, PPIAF is supporting the government<br />

of Guinea in its efforts to integrate its mining ancillary infrastructure into the relevant national development plans.<br />

Across infrastructure sectors, private sector investors in SSA are looking to implement PPP projects that provide suitable<br />

returns for the risks undertaken. These investors have sometimes complained of the lack of bankable deals in the<br />

region, which has made it diffi cult to invest funds appropriately. In fi scal 2012 PPIAF has approved multiple projects<br />

that seek to respond to this challenge by promoting the identifi cation and prioritization of potential PPP projects. In<br />

Burundi, Côte d’Ivoire, Gabon, Niger, and Zimbabwe PPIAF is providing support to screen and examine infrastructure<br />

projects for their suitability to be structured as PPPs. In doing so, PPIAF is helping these governments prioritize fi rstmover<br />

projects and signal to potential investors their government commitment to developing a multi-project PPP


Ethiopia: Solid Waste Management<br />

PPIAF Funding: $391,500<br />

Background: In 2002 municipal solid waste management (SWM) was<br />

in a poor state in Ethiopia, and the absence of an appropriate policy and<br />

regulatory environment continued to inhibit private sector participation<br />

(PSP). SWM had not been a national priority, and investments were<br />

minimal; poor waste collection and disposal practices had signifi cant<br />

environmental and health impacts. There was no formal structure<br />

for charging waste generators, and weak fi nancial and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y<br />

systems were one of the major sources of poor waste management<br />

performance. PSP in SWM was limited to informal pre-collection<br />

companies in Addis Ababa and a few other cities. Moreover, there was<br />

virtually no capacity within government to develop appropriate SWM<br />

contracts and carry out the tendering and evaluation process for PSP.<br />

PPIAF’s Contribution: Although government interest in PSP in the solid waste sector was growing, it was<br />

essential that the necessary framework for PSP be developed before contracts were tendered and the private<br />

sector became formally engaged in SWM operations. In late 2002 the government of Ethiopia sought PPIAF<br />

support in the solid waste sector. PPIAF supported: 1) a diagnostic of the solid waste sector in the country;<br />

2) an assessment of the legal and institutional changes required for greater PSP; 3) an assessment of the PSP<br />

opportunities and options available to the Environmental Protection Agency; 4) recommendations on policy,<br />

institutional reforms, strategy, and applicable laws necessary for greater PSP; and 5) capacity building training<br />

through courses on fi nance and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y options in the SWM sector, workshops with relevant stakeholders,<br />

and two study tours to South Africa and Egypt.<br />

Outcomes: The PPIAF activity built the technical capacity of municipality staff to understand the principles<br />

of private fi nancing, operation, and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y in the sector, which was crucial for the supervision and<br />

monitoring of the tendering and implementation of PSP. Subsequently the Environmental Protection Agency<br />

began a full review of the national SWM strategy, to incorporate the policy provisions for PSP generated by<br />

the PPIAF-funded study. As a result, in February 2007 the President passed the Solid Waste Management<br />

Proclamation No. 513/2007, which allowed private operators to obtain a permit to engage in the collection,<br />

transportation, and use or disposal of waste.<br />

In May 2007 the Agence Française de Développement approved funding of €5.4 million, out of total project<br />

costs of €27.76 million, for the construction of four transfer stations in Addis Ababa. In May 2008 the World<br />

Bank approved a $145 million loan to support SWM and provide assistance for urban local governments<br />

interested in entering into service contracts with private enterprises for the collection of solid waste.<br />

Impacts: Following the 2007 proclamation, the Municipality of Addis Ababa, with 3 million residents, was<br />

divided into 549 collection zones with one private enterprise assigned to each zone. Service charges for waste<br />

collection are collected as part of water consumption rates, and payment is on a volume-based rate of 30 birr<br />

(around $1.75) per m 3 of waste collected. Thus far 524 enterprises have obtained permits to perform primary<br />

collection of solid waste in Addis Ababa, employing a total of 5,815 waste collectors. Consequently, the<br />

garbage collection rate has increased from 60% to 80%, and an additional 600,000 residents in Addis Ababa<br />

now have their waste collected.


program. It is hoped that PPIAF can provide second-phase support to the projects identifi ed for more in depth<br />

pre-feasibility studies and project appraisal. In addition, many of these projects also include a component that assesses<br />

the enabling environment for PPPs in general, and for the identifi ed projects in particular. In doing so, the activities<br />

are designed to quickly fl ag legislative and regulatory impediments that need to be addressed before a project can<br />

be launched.<br />

Expanding access and improving services in Africa will need private sector involvement, but given the magnitude of<br />

the challenges it will continue to require an active participation of the public sector. This is why PPIAF, through its Sub-<br />

National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program also supports the efforts of municipalities responsible for the provision<br />

of public services, as well as autonomous public utilities, to improve their fi nancial and operational performance and<br />

their capacity to access fi nancing in commercial and quasi-commercial terms. In fi scal 2012, the SNTA program has<br />

approved activities in Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Mauritania to improve the fi nancial performance of municipalities in<br />

those countries, and has also supported an Africa-wide capacity building workshop on revenue management, which<br />

was co-fi nanced by the Agence Française de Développement’s Center for Financial, Economic, and Banking Studies.<br />

SNTA has also approved an activity in Kenya that supports an assessment of the Geothermal Development Company<br />

to enhance its access to fi nance.<br />

PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />

• Africa: African Energy Ministers’ Conference, approved August 23, 2011, $40,000<br />

• Africa: Legal Services in Support of the West African Power Pool’s Power Inter-connector Project for Côte<br />

d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea, approved February 28, 2012, $70,800<br />

• Africa: Lighting Africa Expansion, approved December 5, 2011, $250,000<br />

• Africa (SNTA): Regional Capacity Building Workshop with Agence Française de Développement on Revenue<br />

Management, approved March 4, 2012, $75,000<br />

• Africa: Regional Conference on PPPs in Water and Sanitation in SSA, approved March 26, 2012, $50,000<br />

• Burkina Faso (SNTA): Strengthening of Fiscal Revenues for the Municipality of Ouagadougou, approved<br />

March 19, 2012 $75,000<br />

• Burundi: Project Pipeline Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of Potential Infrastructure PPPs in the<br />

Energy Sector, approved January 31, 2012, $74,500<br />

• Cameroon: Support to the Water Sector, approved February 15, 2012, $40,000<br />

• Comoros: Options Evaluation and Strategic Roadmap for the Telecommunications Sector, approved December<br />

22, 2011, $75,000<br />

• Côte d’Ivoire: Improving Users’ Awareness on Cost Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable Infrastructure Development—<br />

Phase II, approved December 6, 2011, $67,438<br />

• Côte d’Ivoire: PPP Pipeline and Enabling Environment Support, approved October 16, 2011, $74,640<br />

• Gabon: PPP Program, approved February 7, 2012, $74,640<br />

• Ghana (SNTA): Increasing Access to Market-Based Financing for Municipalities in the Greater Accra Area,<br />

approved November 18, 2011, $175,000


PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)... Continued<br />

• Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water Supply—Phase II, approved March 11, 2012, $68,431<br />

• Guinea-Bissau: PPP Training Workshop, approved October 16, 2011, $49,963<br />

• Guinea: Mining Ancillary Infrastructure, approved January 10, 2012, $490,000<br />

• Guinea: PPP Training Workshop, approved October 30, 2011, $57,763<br />

• Kenya (SNTA): Assessment of Geothermal Development Company for Enhanced Access to Finance, approved<br />

September 28, 2011, $46,750<br />

• Kenya: Lake Turkana Wind Due Diligence Project, approved November 30, 2011, $294,900<br />

• Lesotho: Legal Advisory Support to ICT and Facilities Management PPP, approved December 16, 2011,<br />

$301,160<br />

• Mali: Capacity Building Support to the Scatec and Kenie Projects, approved December 5, 2011, $49,890<br />

• Mali: Improving Governance and Accountability to Foster an Enabling Environment for Private Sector Participa<br />

tion in the Electricity and Water Sectors, approved July 24, 2011, $74,890<br />

• Mali: Legal Advisory to the Government of Mali for the Scatec Solar Project, approved November 11, 2011,<br />

$49,950<br />

• Mauritania (SNTA): PEFA Study for the Communauté Urbaine de Nouakchott, approved October 30, 2011,<br />

$147,995<br />

• Mozambique: Preparation of a Gas Sector Master Plan, approved September 14, 2011, $250,000<br />

• Niger: Evaluation of Projects with Private Participation for Production and Supply of Electricity in Rural Areas,<br />

approved March 11, 2011, $60,000<br />

• Nigeria: Support for Private Development of the Power Sector, approved December 2, 2011, $402,500<br />

• Nigeria: Workshop on Water Utility Reform, approved December 2, 2011, $32,450<br />

• Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project—Technical Assistance and Capacity Training, approved November 1,<br />

2011, $207,700<br />

• South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg, approved March 20,<br />

2012, $74,820<br />

• South Sudan: Diagnostic of Power Distribution System, approved December 14, 2011, $75,000<br />

PPIAF has supported activities in: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape<br />

Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia,<br />

Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali,<br />

Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Rwanda, São Tomé and Princípe,<br />

Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, and Zambia


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

REGIONAL UPDATE<br />

PPIAF’S WORK IN EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC<br />

April 2012<br />

The growth of economies in the East Asia and the Pacific (EAP) region remains strong<br />

but constrained by weakening external demand due to the sluggish U.S. economy,<br />

uncertainties in the eurozone, and the impact of natural disasters (such as the tsunami<br />

in Japan and flooding in several countries) in the production supply chain. The slow<br />

global growth, however, presents an opportunity to enhance medium- to long-term<br />

growth by increasing investment in infrastructure (particularly in those sectors that<br />

support production) and increasing the quality and efficiency of these investments.<br />

The private sector can play a role in financing and improving the delivery of productive<br />

infrastructure. PPIAF assistance in the region continues to be centered on building a<br />

robust pipeline of public-private partnership (PPP) projects and improving enabling<br />

environments for private sector financing.<br />

Since inception PPIAF has approved $32,278,827 in funding to 151 projects in the<br />

EAP region, representing 15% of PPIAF’s total funding portfolio. Projects have been<br />

concentrated in the largest countries in terms of economies and population: China,<br />

Indonesia, Philippines, and Vietnam. These four countries account for 60% of all<br />

funding in the region. Multi-sector activities dominate and represent 32% of PPIAF’s<br />

funding portfolio, followed by 23% in energy and 18% in water. PPIAF has activities in<br />

over 11 countries with a current portfolio of 14 ongoing activities.<br />

In recent months, PPIAF supported four activities that will help governments determine<br />

the potential for private sector participation in roads in Lao PDR and Vietnam, irrigation<br />

in the Philippines, and a nationwide e-ID system in Vietnam. PPIAF also approved two<br />

Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) activities to support the credit rating of<br />

Jakarta, Indonesia in preparation for a bond issuance and improve the creditworthiness<br />

of Tanuan City in the Philippines.<br />

Recent PPIAF assistance in the region focused on developing a pipeline of PPPs particularly in the<br />

roads, irrigation, and ICT sectors. Lao PDR is positioning itself as a “land-linked” country for regional<br />

trade, and is looking at PPPs as an innovative way of fi nancing future infrastructure investment. A<br />

PPIAF activity is supporting the government of Lao PDR in conducting the preliminary assessment<br />

of the enabling environment for PPPs in the transport sector and the country’s potential PPP pipeline.<br />

The activity will serve as an input to the Lao National Strategy for the Transport Sector. In the<br />

Philippines, PPP arrangements are relatively new in the agriculture sector, and the Department of<br />

Agriculture requested support to address the enabling environment for PPPs and build its capacity<br />

to implement its PPP program. PPIAF is currently providing assistance to the to the Department<br />

to identify policy, regulatory, and institutional constraints in the sector, in addition to a pipeline<br />

of bankable projects. Another PPIAF activity is providing assistance to determine options in the


design and execution of a PPP e-ID system in Vietnam. The deployment of e-ID systems helps increase effi ciency and<br />

transparency of public service delivery to citizens. The private sector’s role in deploying this e-ID infrastructure is critical,<br />

because it can potentially ensure the fi nancial viability and sustainability of the project.<br />

Strengthening private sector engagement is also important, particularly in countries where the PPP model has<br />

been gaining support. In Vietnam, for example, the Ministry of Transport—through the Directorate of Roads<br />

Vietnam—is taking the lead in setting a strategic vision for the national road system, which will include the use of<br />

performance-based contracts in road maintenance. PPIAF is helping to undertake a review of the current approach<br />

to performance-based road maintenance contracting in Vietnam and providing recommendations to improve its<br />

implementation.<br />

Two SNTA activities were approved in recent months to assist local government units access market-based fi nancing<br />

to support priority projects that will help them cope with the challenges of rapid urbanization and climate change.<br />

The fi rst activity will support a credit rating and fi nancial management assessment of the Province of Jakarta and the<br />

strengthening of its newly established Debt Management Unit in assessing and monitoring debt. The Province of<br />

Jakarta is keen on issuing a bond in July 2012, which will potentially be the fi rst municipal bond issuance for Indonesia.<br />

The other SNTA activity is helping the City of Tanuan in the Philippines improve its capacity for fi scal and fi nancial<br />

management as it considers a local currency loan from the International Finance Corporation to fi nance its capital<br />

expenditure program for essential infrastructure. The planned transaction will be different from earlier borrowing by<br />

the city, as this will not involve traditional inter-governmental transfers (block grants from the national government<br />

to local governments) as security.<br />

Looking forward, PPIAF assistance in EAP will continue in the region’s larger economies, but focusing on the least<br />

developed economies remains a strategic priority. To date, potential activities in the energy sector in Papua New<br />

Guinea and telecommunications sector in Myanmar are being explored. Developing a pipeline for PPIAF’s SNTA<br />

window will also be a priority starting with follow-up support to local governments that benefi tted from initial activities<br />

under the SNTA assistance (see box below).


Indonesia: Support for Financial and Credit Rating Assessment for Sub-National<br />

Governments<br />

PPIAF Funding: $330,000<br />

Background: About a decade ago, Indonesia implemented a<br />

sweeping decentralization reform, which made empowering local<br />

governments critical. To help increase the level and quality of<br />

local spending for public services and infrastructure, Indonesia<br />

embarked on developing a framework for sub-national borrowing,<br />

in particular on issuing municipal bonds. In this context, the<br />

Ministry of Finance sought guidance from the World Bank on<br />

setting up a system for fi nancial assessment and credit ratings,<br />

and assisting sub-national governments in attaining credit ratings<br />

and issuing of bonds.<br />

PPIAF’s Contribution: As part of the overall work to support the Ministry of Finance in developing a framework<br />

for sub-national borrowing, PPIAF’s SNTA program supported fi nancial management assessments and credit<br />

ratings for four cities: Surabaya, Makassar, Bandung, and Balikpapan.<br />

Outcomes: In 2011 the fi nancial management assessments and credit ratings were completed for the four<br />

cities. The assessments for Surabaya and Bandung were done by Standard & Poor’s, while those for Makassar<br />

and Balikpapan were done by PEFINDO, a local rating agency. A workshop was conducted on November 21,<br />

2011 in Jakarta to present the results of the assessments and credit rating reports, discuss the legal background<br />

of sub-national borrowing (Government Regulation 30/2011), share international experiences with sub-national<br />

borrowing, and share the experience of DKI Jakarta in preparing for the issuance of Indonesia’s fi rst municipal<br />

bond. The results of the fi nancial management assessments and credit ratings for the participating cities were<br />

very encouraging, and the cities also found the inputs from these reports to be benefi cial to improve their fi scal<br />

management practices. Follow-up support to Makassar and Surabaya to help them move towards accessing<br />

market-based fi nancing is currently being explored.<br />

PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />

• Indonesia (SNTA): Jakarta Credit Rating, approved February 19, 2012, $75,000<br />

• Laos: Transport Sector Enabling Environment Assessment and Pipeline Screening, approved December 21,<br />

2011, $50,000<br />

• Philippines (SNTA): Assisting Tanuan City in Enhancing the City’s Creditworthiness, approved March 20,<br />

2012, $75,000<br />

• Philippines: Options to Expand Private Sector Participation in the Development of the Irrigation Sector,<br />

approved March 20, 2012, $100,000<br />

• Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID System for the<br />

Delivery of Public Services, approved March 29, 2012, $230,620<br />

• Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-Based Contracts for Road Maintenance, approved October<br />

17, 2011, $40,000<br />

PPIAF has supported activities in: Cambodia, China, East Timor, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Mongolia, Papua<br />

New Guinea, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Thailand, Vanuatu, and Vietnam


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

REGIONAL UPDATE<br />

April 2012<br />

PPIAF’S WORK IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA<br />

The global financial crisis that began in late 2008 set back ambitious infrastructure<br />

development plans for many countries in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ECA)<br />

region. Many such plans relied on public-private partnership (PPP) arrangements. The<br />

flight to quality projects and countries perceived as less risky has been notable. Across<br />

the region, each project structure exhibited unique risks, but since the crisis, increased<br />

complexity and longer times between contract signature and financial close have been<br />

common.<br />

Since inception PPIAF and its Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program have<br />

provided $26,145,155 in funding to 119 projects in the ECA region, representing 12%<br />

of PPIAF’s total portfolio. Armenia dominates the regional portfolio with 15 projects<br />

worth $3.6 million approved since inception. Ukraine, with eight activities, has the<br />

next highest number of activities, followed by Croatia, with six activities, Bosnia and<br />

Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Turkey, with five activities each. Energy and<br />

multi-sector activities represent 35% and 19% respectively of PPIAF’s portfolio in the<br />

region.<br />

In recent months, PPIAF approved one activity in Albania to provide technical assessments<br />

for three hydropower transactions; another activity in Albania to improve universal<br />

access and service policy framework in the ICT sector; one activity in Armenia supporting<br />

private sector involvement in the operation of regional bus stations; another activity<br />

in Armenia assisting the Armenia Water and Sewerage Company with the design of<br />

the enhanced management contract for 2011–2013; one activity in Moldova to assess<br />

the feasibility of a cloud-based ICT PPP scheme; and one activity in Tajikistan to draft<br />

a new investment law.<br />

The ECA region has seen investment in infrastructure projects with private participation grow by<br />

80%, emerging as a leader among other developing regions. However, the fi nancial crisis has had<br />

an adverse impact on private sector funding fl ows: investment levels have since dropped signifi cantly<br />

lower than in previous years, and have dropped at a much higher rate than that in other developing<br />

regions.<br />

Nevertheless, as of 2011 the city of St. Petersburg had closed fi ve signifi cant PPP projects, including<br />

the €1.5 billion Moscow–St. Petersburg Highway and the €1 billion Pulkoyo Airport Development<br />

project. Another area of growth in PPP project development was in renewable energy. Largely thanks<br />

to effective policy support, 2011 also saw signifi cant growth in PPPs in renewable energy projects;<br />

Bulgaria and Romania PPP deals closed in this sector with values of $370 million and $1.3 billion,<br />

respectively. These projects demonstrate sectoral and regional pockets of appetite for PPPs in ECA<br />

as the global fi nancial crisis lessens in intensity.


Albania: Technical Assistance for the Transport Sector<br />

PPIAF Funding: $245,000<br />

Background: In 2005 Albania’s road infrastructure was<br />

inadequate, as about 63% of the national road network<br />

was in poor condition, and the sector was in need of major<br />

investment. However, given the huge investment needs, the<br />

government realized that it could not achieve the targets laid<br />

out in its National Transport Plan using only government and/<br />

or donor funds. The government was therefore interested<br />

in exploring private participation options to support its road<br />

infrastructure development goals. In 2005 the government<br />

requested PPIAF support to provide a road map for private<br />

participation in the road sector, by identifying obstacles to PPPs<br />

and recommendations to increase private sector interest.<br />

PPIAF’s Contribution: The PPIAF-funded framework report was compiled within the context of huge investment<br />

needs in the roads sector in Albania. In assessing available PPP structures, the report assessed build-operatetransfer,<br />

rehabilitate-operate-transfer, and maintain-operate-transfer as the best available options to maximize<br />

private participation for high priority investments in the sector. The report noted that with low traffi c volumes,<br />

weak local fi nancial markets, and inexperience with tolling, the government’s objective of large-scale private<br />

sector investment in roads would be a longer-term objective.<br />

A one-day training session on PPPs in the roads sector was held, and the report’s recommendations were<br />

presented at a two-day workshop in May 2007. Consensus was achieved on moving forward with the design<br />

of performance-based road maintenance contracts for Albanian roads.<br />

Outcomes: Following on from the recommendations of the PPIAF activity, a World Bank project was launched<br />

to support the piloting of four performance-based maintenance contracts in the Tirana and Kukës regions.<br />

The three-year contracts were subsequently awarded in October 2009. The total cost of these contracts was<br />

$10 million, with the fi rst two years paid by the World Bank, and the third year fi nanced by the government<br />

of Albania. Since the beginning of the contracts, the contractors have improved their overall performance and<br />

built their capacity in the performance-based maintenance approach. As a result, it is likely that the approach<br />

will be scaled-up in other regions within Albania.<br />

In addition, enabling legislation was passed in October 2009 to transform the General Roads Directorate<br />

into the Albanian Road Authority, which is responsible for national and regional roads. The Albanian Road<br />

Authority Board was appointed in September 2010, and the authority will benefi t from autonomy and greater<br />

responsibility for overseeing the roads sector in Albania, as recommended in the PPIAF-funded report.<br />

Finally, the government of Albania has recently decided to introduce a tolling system on the Durres–Kukës<br />

highway. It will be the fi rst highway to charge tolls to <strong>cover</strong> maintenance costs, and the government intends<br />

to introduce tolls to other highways currently under construction. The Durres–Kukës highway was constructed<br />

in 2007–2010 to connect Kosovo with the Albanian seaport of Durres. As of February 2012, fi ve international<br />

consortia have submitted bids to upgrade, operate, and maintain the new Durres–Kukës highway. The lead<br />

fi nancial advisor on the project is the International Finance Corporation PPP Transaction Advisory team.


PPIAF support to ECA has shifted its focus from the Balkan states to a broader pool of countries, including Tajikistan.<br />

With respect to the scope of PPIAF-funded activities, the focus has shifted from regional initiatives to single-country<br />

activities, often supporting specifi c PPP transactions. While PPIAF continues to support the development of a wholesale<br />

electricity market in Southeastern Europe in order to achieve greater economies of scale, the large majority of<br />

new activities provide just-in-time interventions strengthening client countries’ capacity to successfully close selected<br />

PPP schemes (i.e., in Albania, Armenia, and Moldova).<br />

Particularly noteworthy is the realization in Moldova of a feasibility study for a PPP on the development of a “cloud”<br />

computing-based data center. This activity will create a set of reference documents that can be later reused by other<br />

countries interested in building cloud-based shared e-government infrastructure leveraging PPPs.<br />

PPIAF responded quickly and provided assistance in fi scal 2012 to meet the needs resulting from the fi nancial crisis.<br />

In Albania, PPIAF is assisting the government to further liberalize the energy sector, enhance private sector participation,<br />

and monetize the value of its generation assets.<br />

PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />

• Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower Plants, approved<br />

December 15, 2011, $75,000<br />

• Albania: Universal Access and Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector, approved November 26, 2011,<br />

$148,100<br />

• Armenia: Advisory Support for Private Sector Involvement in Operation of Regional Bus Station, approved<br />

September 15, 2011, $75,000<br />

• Armenia: Support to the Armenia Water and Sewerage Company with the Design of the Enhanced<br />

Management Contract for 2011–2013, approved July 15, 2011, $75,000<br />

• Moldova: Feasibility Study for Cloud-Based Shared Infrastructure PPP, approved January 15, 2012, $200,000<br />

• Tajikistan: Drafting a New Investment Law in Tajikistan, approved September 27, 2011, $200,000<br />

PPIAF has supported activities in: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina,<br />

Bulgaria, Croatia, Federal Republic of Serbia and Montenegro, Georgia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kosovo,<br />

Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia,<br />

Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

REGIONAL UPDATE<br />

April 2012<br />

PPIAF’S WORK IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN<br />

Latin America has the most unequal income distribution in the world as well as high<br />

rates of extreme poverty.<br />

Since inception PPIAF has provided $24,780,304 in funding to 122 projects in the Latin<br />

America and Caribbean (LAC) region, representing 12% of PPIAF’s total portfolio.<br />

Brazil leads with the most funding received ($3.1 million) for 15 activities, but is closely<br />

followed by Colombia with 17 projects worth $2.9 million and Peru with 12 activities<br />

worth $2.9 million. Twenty-six region-wide activities worth $4.7 million have also been<br />

approved since inception. Multi-sector activities represent 39% of PPIAF’s portfolio in<br />

the region, followed by 21% in transport and 18% in water and sanitation.<br />

In recent months, PPIAF has approved one activity in Uruguay to provide transaction<br />

assistance with the review of existing road projects, assess their overall bankability,<br />

and identify financial instruments for the public-private partnership (PPP) structure.<br />

Another significant activity recently funded by PPIAF seeks to improve the forestry<br />

concession model in the Amazon, one of the first concessions of sustainable forestry<br />

management concessions carried out by the Brazilian Forest Service. On the subnational<br />

side, one noteworthy activity recently approved through PPIAF’s Sub-National<br />

Technical Assistance (SNTA) program supports the feasibility study for the development<br />

of tradable air rights instruments to mobilize private financing in Bogotá, Colombia.<br />

The LAC region has consistently led the way in terms of private participation in infrastructure. At the<br />

beginning of the 1990s, all developing countries in the region suffered from large infrastructure defi -<br />

cits, dismal service standards, tight fi scal constraints, and deep problems with the traditional mode<br />

of public infrastructure service delivery. There were weak incentives for effi ciency and infrastructure<br />

delivery was often embedded within patronage-drive political systems. In most of these countries,<br />

the decline in public fi nance was larger than the increase. The exception was Colombia, where the<br />

decline was slight and, on average, public investment levels remained roughly unchanged (albeit<br />

with major fl uctuations) throughout the period.<br />

In recent years, however, privatization has slowed dramatically in the region. Disparities in LAC are<br />

also refl ected by the different maturity levels of private participation in infrastructure markets across<br />

the region. Numerous countries in the region are moving towards a second phase of programs for<br />

private participation in infrastructure—mostly through PPP schemes—while other countries are just<br />

beginning the process. As of 2012, several countries in the region—including Brazil, Chile, Costa<br />

Rica, and Peru—have created government departments to foster investment through PPPs. Most<br />

recently, in December 2011 the Mexican Congress approved the Public-Private Partnership Act,


a piece of legislation that aims to promote PPPs by providing an offi cial framework for public and private entities to<br />

enter into such agreements.<br />

PPIAF is expected to spearhead private participation in infrastructure activities in the region by piloting cutting-edge<br />

interventions and consolidating know-how that will benefi t initiatives worldwide. A good example of this is a recent<br />

activity with the Brazilian Forestry Service, which is in charge of awarding concessions for forest management of<br />

federal public forests in Brazil. Forest concessions on publicly-owned land can play a crucial role in the promotion<br />

of sustainable forest management and the reduction of illegal logging or forest conversion. The Brazilian federal<br />

government’s Forest Concession Program intends to create a new paradigm for forestry production in the Amazon,<br />

ensuring social control over this activity, fi ghting illegal land occupation, and inducing players in the logging sector<br />

to adopt a sustainable and business oriented behavior in their activities.<br />

Honduras: Support to Non-Revenue Water Performance-Based Contracting<br />

PPIAF Funding: $75,000<br />

Background: Access to water and sanitation services improved in<br />

Honduras in the 1990s, in both rural and urban areas. However, the<br />

sector’s weak institutional framework and competition between<br />

national, state, and municipal actors led to a lack of planning,<br />

inadequate regulation of operators, and poorly-defi ned policies.<br />

In 2003 the government of Honduras passed the Drinking Water<br />

and Sanitation Sector Framework Law, which created a central<br />

policy-making council (CONASA) and an independent regulatory<br />

agency (ERSAPS). The law also decentralized water and sanitation<br />

services, shifting the responsibility for operations from the national<br />

water and sewerage agency (SANAA) to municipalities.<br />

PPIAF’s Contribution: PPIAF assistance was requested in 2008 to support a non-revenue water (NRW)<br />

performance-based management contract for SANAA’s operations in Honduras’ capital city, Tegucigalpa<br />

Metropolitan District. The contract was piloted by a World Bank project to demonstrate how the private sector<br />

can be used as an effi cient means to achieve signifi cant improvements in operational and fi nancial performance.<br />

PPIAF funded several elements to ensure the contract design refl ected international best practice in NRW<br />

management, including training for SANAA staff on management and NRW contracts and a report on the<br />

lessons learned from the design and bidding process.<br />

Outcomes: The $6.5 million NRW contract went into effect July 1, 2011, and was awarded to a consortium<br />

made up of ACC Ingenieria SAS, Radian Colombia SAS, and Veritec Consulting Inc. The consortium’s obligations<br />

under the contract include: assessing the current conditions of the water supply; implementing minimum cost<br />

interventions to improve service reliability and hours of service; and reducing both physical and commercial<br />

losses to improve the utility’s income.


The track record of urban development projects (e.g., rapid transit systems), coupled with the fi nancial viability of<br />

some sub-national governments in Latin America, led to the need for innovative fi nancial tools to incorporate future<br />

gains in land value resulting from the realization of major infrastructure projects. One such fi nancial instrument is<br />

tradable development rights originally developed in Brazil. An SNTA project in Colombia is helping Bogotá tap private<br />

sources of fi nancing by auctioning additional building rights to private investors beyond what was initially permitted<br />

by the city’s zoning legislation. The resulting certifi cates are freely tradable instruments in the local stock exchange.<br />

The development of innovative fi nancial tools allows the public sector to mobilize private fi nancing for such infrastructure<br />

investments and frees up much-needed fi scal space to target other pressing social and economic concerns.<br />

PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />

• Belize (SNTA): Improve Municipal Creditworthiness for Belize Municipalities, approved July 15, 2011, $75,000<br />

• Brazil: Improving the Sustainable Forestry Concession Model in the Amazon, approved September 21, 2011,<br />

$400,000<br />

• Colombia (SNTA): Feasibility Study to Develop Tradable Air Rights Instruments to Mobilize Private Financing for<br />

Bogotá’s Carrera 7 Bus Rapid Transit Corridor, approved November 24, 2011, $179,780<br />

• Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income Housing Projects, approved March 4, 2012, 74,800<br />

• Mexico (SNTA): Strengthening Lending Market for Small Mexican Municipalities, approved August 10, 2011,<br />

$75,000<br />

• Panama: Preparation of a Performance-Based Effi ciency Improvement Contract for IDAAN’s Colón Business Unit,<br />

approved November 4, 2011, $74,975<br />

• Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure, approved January 8, 2012, $75,000<br />

• Uruguay: Development of Financing Options for PPPs in the Roads Sector, approved September 9, 2011,<br />

$250,000<br />

PPIAF has supported activities in: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican<br />

Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua,<br />

Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

REGIONAL UPDATE<br />

April 2012<br />

PPIAF’S WORK IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA<br />

Political turmoil has swept the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region since the<br />

Arab Spring, which began in Tunisia in December 2010 and spread to several other<br />

countries. The upheaval has had political and economic consequences across the region,<br />

yet its impact on public-private partnerships (PPPs) is still relatively unclear.<br />

Prior to the Arab Spring, growth rates in the region averaged around 3.2% and were<br />

insufficient to create enough jobs to match a rapidly growing labor force. In 2011 this<br />

growth rate fell to just 1.9% as unrest persisted and economic activity declined. Fiscal<br />

deficits and government debt levels in the MENA region have also grown, particularly<br />

in non-oil producing countries, as governments responded to the unrest by increasing<br />

spending on subsidy programs and cutting tax rates. Unemployment in the region,<br />

one of the contributing factors to the Arab Spring, is still around 10%, significantly<br />

higher than that in other regions. The problem is particularly acute among the youth<br />

and women, who are suffering from 20–25% and 30–35% unemployment, respectively.<br />

The MENA region is expected to experience a large increase in its working population,<br />

almost doubling to 605 million by 2050, and the region will need to create around 6.75<br />

million jobs per year until 2050 in order to avoid an increase in unemployment rates.<br />

As of March 31, 2012 PPIAF had provided $10,315,630 in funding to 61 projects in the<br />

MENA region, representing 5% of PPIAF’s total funding portfolio since inception. Since<br />

fiscal 2010, MENA activities have represented 11% of PPIAF’s portfolio, as requests<br />

for PPIAF assistance have grown more frequent due to recent increased interest from<br />

regional governments in private sector participation in the provision of infrastructure<br />

services. The portfolio is also evolving, from a focus on middle-income countries such<br />

as Jordan, Egypt, and Morocco, to focus on lower-income and fragile countries such as<br />

Djibouti and the West Bank and Gaza. On a sectoral basis, energy activities represent<br />

56% of PPIAF’s ongoing portfolio in the region, followed by 20% in water.<br />

As regional governments work towards economic development and growth, the provision of<br />

adequate infrastructure services has grown in importance. MENA countries have a critical need<br />

to upgrade their infrastructure to address past underinvestment and new demand, and a link<br />

was drawn between the Arab Spring and lack of access towards adequate infrastructure services.<br />

However, with state budgets stretched thin, regional governments face a serious challenge of<br />

increasing the quality and quantity of infrastructure services in MENA. Since the global fi nancial<br />

crisis, governments in the region are increasingly looking to leverage private sector management<br />

expertise and/or fi nancing to expand and improve infrastructure services. As a result, PPIAF’s MENA<br />

portfolio has been highly solicited by a range of governments to identify and implement PPPs.


PPIAF’s portfolio in low-income and fragile states has grown in fi scal 2012. In Djibouti, PPIAF is currently providing<br />

support to the solid waste and transport sectors, and recently approved three more activities in the energy and telecommunications<br />

sectors. The fi rst activity is assisting the government of Djibouti to refi ne its energy sector master<br />

plan, assess the cost of refurbishing existing generation plants, and identify least cost infrastructure investments that<br />

can be effectively fi nanced and managed through a PPP. It is anticipated that this analysis will help the government to<br />

defi ne a sector strategy that suits its energy and investments needs, and is cognizant of the potential for geothermal<br />

energy, which is currently being explored. The second energy activity is analyzing the technical, economic, and fi nancial<br />

feasibility of rural electrifi cation options to determine the most viable and sustainable roll-out option available to<br />

electrify 25 villages in rural Djibouti using solar energy. In addition, a third activity in the telecommunications sector<br />

is assessing sector liberalization options to help the government transform the sector into an engine of economic<br />

growth and employment.<br />

Morocco: PPP Unit<br />

PPIAF Funding: $245,700<br />

Background: The World Bank Group’s Country Partnership Strategy 2010–<br />

2013 for Morocco underlines the challenges related to underinvestment<br />

in infrastructure and the need to improve the quality and sustainability of<br />

infrastructure provision in Morocco. The government of Morocco, aware<br />

of these challenges, sought PPIAF support for assistance in launching its<br />

PPP program, designed to scale up infrastructure investments in sectors<br />

including energy, transportation, water, health, and education. The<br />

government’s commitment to exploring the PPP modality also relates<br />

to the country’s current economic context, where fi scal constraints and<br />

the impact of the global fi nancial crisis have limited the ability of the<br />

government to fi nance critical infrastructure investments.<br />

PPIAF’s Contribution: PPIAF provided support to assist the government of Morocco in launching its PPP<br />

program through the design of a dedicated PPP unit within the Directorate for State Enterprises and Privatization<br />

(DEPP), a specialized department within the Moroccan Ministry of Finance. The second component of the<br />

activity assisted in the identifi cation and screening of pilot PPP transactions. The activity also strengthened the<br />

DEPP’s PPP expertise via the organization of seminars. The medium-term goal of the activity was to identify PPP<br />

transactions that could be implemented within the framework of transaction advisory mandates to be led by<br />

the IFC’s PPP Transaction Advisory Services department.<br />

Outcomes: In May 2011, with assistance from PPIAF and the IFC, a central PPP Unit was established within the<br />

DEPP. The PPP unit is responsible for promoting PPPs in Morocco through coordination with sector ministries,<br />

and assisting in the development and implementation of PPP projects. The government is now discussing the<br />

drafting of a PPP Law as it seeks to develop and improve the enabling environment for PPPs in Morocco. The<br />

PPP identifi cation exercise launched under the PPIAF activity is also showing signs of success. Despite decisionmaking<br />

delays caused by the recent November 2011 parliamentary elections, several potential projects are<br />

being analyzed, including advising the National Social Security Agency (Caisse Nationale de Sécurite Sociale) in<br />

the development, structuring, and implementation of Morocco’s fi rst health PPP project, which would require<br />

a private operator to invest in, maintain, and operate a network of 13 clinics.


In the West Bank and Gaza, a strategic priority for PPIAF, two activities have thus far been approved in fi scal 2012. PPIAF<br />

is supporting the fi rst PPP transaction by providing funding for legal advisory transaction support for the Southern West<br />

Bank Solid Waste Management Project. The project, to be structured by the International Finance Corporation (IFC),<br />

is supporting the Joint Services Council for Hebron and Bethlehem in attracting private sector participation for the<br />

operation and maintenance of the new Al-Minya Landfi ll that will provide improved solid waste management services<br />

to approximately 780,000 inhabitants. The landfi ll is expected to open in early 2013 and will process approximately<br />

34% of the solid waste in the West Bank. It is designed based on international standards, and will dramatically improve<br />

sanitation services and help to eliminate the use of unregulated dump sites. The second activity is also innovative as it<br />

is one of the fi rst examples of support to the MENA region through PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA)<br />

program. The activity will work with municipalities across the West Bank and Gaza to improve and expand municipal<br />

revenue generation in order to improve municipalities’ creditworthiness. In the medium-term it is hoped that some of<br />

the best performing municipalities may be able to gain a credit rating, which will enable them to access market-based<br />

fi nance to fund infrastructure development.<br />

Looking forward, PPIAF assistance is needed to implement critical reforms in the energy, transport, and water sectors<br />

throughout the region, and to further transaction support to middle-income countries in pioneering sectors. Following<br />

the Arab Spring, political upheaval has ushered in a wave of new governments focused on responding to citizens’<br />

demands. Ensuring access to adequate infrastructure services will be crucial to spurring economic development and<br />

growth in the region, and providing jobs for an ever-growing labor force.<br />

Demand for PPIAF technical assistance is expected to grow as governments face the challenge of balancing fiscal<br />

constraints with the need to provide signifi cant investment to meet the infrastructure needs of the region. The global<br />

fi nancial crisis and recent political events have stagnated the PPP market in the region. PPIAF will provide support<br />

to governments to build PPP programs based on their individual requirements and the unique social, political, and<br />

demographic environments in each country.<br />

PPIAF and SNTA Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />

• Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment, approved October 24, 2011, $459,275<br />

• Djibouti: Feasibility Assessment for Solar Rural Electrifi cation, approved December 7, 2011, $400,600<br />

• Djibouti: Options for Telecoms Sector Liberalization, approved January 25, 2012, $107,690<br />

• Lebanon (SNTA): Facilitating Sub-National Government Access to Commercial Credit and Capital Markets,<br />

approved December 21, 2011, $75,000<br />

• Lebanon: Improving the Performance of the Beka’a Regional Water Authority, approved November 20, 2011,<br />

$75,000<br />

• MENA: Developing Alternative Broadband Networks, approved December 11, 2011, $74,510<br />

• MENA: Training Course on PPPs in the Water Sector, approved November 14, 2011, $50,000<br />

• West Bank and Gaza (SNTA): Improving Municipal Revenue Generation Policies and Framework, approved<br />

January 23, 2012, $161,300<br />

• West Bank and Gaza: Southern West Bank Solid Waste Management Project, approved December 16, 2011,<br />

$199,975<br />

PPIAF has supported activities in: Algeria, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria,<br />

Tunisia, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

REGIONAL UPDATE<br />

PPIAF’S WORK IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

April 2012<br />

South Asia—home to 1.5 billion people with over one billion living on less than $2 per<br />

day—has the largest global concentration of poor people. Since inception PPIAF and<br />

its Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program have provided $21,340,924 in<br />

funding to 124 activities in the South Asia Region, representing 10% of PPIAF’s total<br />

portfolio, including SNTA. India dominates the South Asia portfolio with 54 activities<br />

worth $8,918,541 approved since inception. The next most frequent recipient of PPIAF<br />

funding has been Pakistan with 12 activities, followed by Sri Lanka with 9. Multi-sector<br />

activities represent 44% or $9,596,218 of PPIAF’s portfolio in the region, followed by<br />

22% in water and 13% in energy. This South Asia total also incorporates $1,627,850 in<br />

funding to six SNTA activities since the start of that program in 2007—five in India and<br />

one in Nepal.<br />

In fi scal 2012, PPIAF has successfully rebalanced its South Asia portfolio to support the development<br />

of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in countries other than India in the region, particularly<br />

in the most lagging countries. PPIAF approved two activities in Bhutan, two in Sri Lanka, one in<br />

the Maldives, one in Nepal, and one in India.<br />

PPIAF has continued to support the development of strong PPP policies, programs, and pipelines<br />

across South Asia. In Bhutan, PPIAF approved an activity with the Ministry of Information and<br />

Communications to develop a strategic policy roadmap to guide the development of Bhutan’s<br />

telecommunications sector on the introduction of competition, divestment by the existing operators,<br />

and government transformation agenda to use the sector for cost-effective service delivery.<br />

In the Maldives, PPIAF provided management contract support to Malé City Council to structure<br />

and implement a viable tariff structure for waste management services, develop a mechanism for<br />

tariff collection, develop an information system to maintain user data, and monitor the performance<br />

of the concessionaire. In India, PPIAF is providing assistance to the Department of Economic<br />

Affairs in the Ministry of Finance with the preparation of a national PPP policy statement, to serve<br />

as guidance to the states as well as to central ministries as they pursue PPPs in the provision of<br />

infrastructure. In Sri Lanka, PPIAF approved an activity to develop the capacity of the Ministry of<br />

Economic Development and selected Provincial and Local Governments through a series of local<br />

workshops. This activity will contribute to identify a list of potential local infrastructure projects<br />

that could be implemented under a PPP model in the future.


PPIAF has also been supporting a number of screening activities and initial feasibility assessments of potential PPP<br />

infrastructure projects in Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. In Bhutan, the PPIAF-funded PPP feasibility assessment focuses<br />

on a dry port facility in Toribari and a new inter/intra-city bus terminal in Thimphu. In Nepal, PPIAF is helping to identify<br />

potential urban and transport projects that are suitable for fi nancing under a PPP arrangement. In Sri Lanka, PPIAF<br />

assistance is focusing more specifi cally on three potential PPPs: the redevelopment of railway stations in Colombo, a<br />

bulk water supply and transmission project in Bandarawela, and a solar park and wind farm in Mannar.<br />

Maldives: Supporting Private Sector Participation in the Solid Waste Sector<br />

PPIAF Funding: $145,000<br />

Background: The Maldives, a country of 192 inhabited islands with<br />

a population of 395,000, is known for its white-sand beaches and<br />

pristine environment. But its poor waste management practices<br />

were threatening its tourism industry, Maldives’ largest economic<br />

activity. Waste was collected in an ad-hoc manner and dumped at<br />

the shore, disposed of in the ocean, or transported to Thilafushi<br />

Island, where it was burnt openly. This combination of dumping<br />

and open burning destroyed the marine environment, polluted<br />

the air, and put the health of the country’s population at risk.<br />

PPIAF’s Contribution: To address this problem, the government of Maldives turned to PPIAF in 2009 to<br />

review options to introduce best practices in solid waste management through private sector participation in<br />

conjunction with the International Finance Corporation (IFC)’s mandate as lead transaction advisor to implement<br />

a waste management PPP project.<br />

PPIAF technical assistance recommended an institutional and regulatory framework to promote<br />

PPPs; an optimal collection, segregation, treatment, and disposal technology; measures to enhance<br />

the project’s fi nancial viability; and PPP options for the management of the solid waste services. The<br />

due diligence work also included drafting technical sections and performance obligations for the<br />

bidding process, pre-qualifi cation, and evaluation of the award of the waste management contract.<br />

Outcomes: In May 2011, the government successfully implemented a solid waste management PPP following<br />

PPIAF’s recommendations and with the help of IFC as lead transaction advisor. In September 2012, PPIAF<br />

approved a follow-up activity to help the Malé City Council structure and implement a viable tariff structure for<br />

waste management services provided under the management contract.


PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />

• Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects Under a PPP Model, approved January 12, 2012,<br />

$64,450<br />

• Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap, approved August 30, 2011, $75,000<br />

• India: Assistance in Finalization of a PPP Policy, approved November 1, 2011, $75,000<br />

• Maldives: Contract Management Support for Solid Waste Management PPP, approved September 17, 2011,<br />

$74,950<br />

• Nepal: Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of Potential Private-Public Infrastructure Projects, approved<br />

December 19, 2011, $50,000<br />

• Sri Lanka: Identifying PPP Opportunities for Local Governments, approved February 12, 2012, $75,000<br />

• Sri Lanka: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects under a PPP Model, approved March 21, 2012,<br />

$75,000<br />

PPIAF has supported activities in: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal,<br />

Pakistan, and Sri Lanka


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

March 2011<br />

IMPACT STORIES<br />

PPIAF Supports Small-Scale Water<br />

Providers in Uganda<br />

To complement and support the Uganda Small-Scale Infrastructure Provider (SSIP)<br />

Water Program, PPIAF support was sought in 2009 to assess private operators’<br />

ability to expand service delivery in Uganda’s water sector, which included<br />

reviewing the terms and conditions of available fi nancing and the constraints<br />

private operators face. The recommendations from the PPIAF-funded study were<br />

implemented by the International Finance Corporation (IFC), who organized training<br />

sessions to present the Uganda SSIP Water Program to local banks in Uganda to assess<br />

their interest in fi nancing private water operators. Following the training event, two<br />

banks expressed interest to provide pre-fi nancing loans to the pre-qualifi ed bidders for a<br />

tender in Busembatia, one of the small towns in the Uganda SSIP Water Program. The fi rst fi veyear<br />

management contract was awarded in June 2010 to a private operator for the expansion of<br />

piped water services in Busembatia. This private operator was able to receive a loan from DFCU Bank,<br />

a Ugandan commercial bank, of approximately $100,000 for the expansion of piped water services.<br />

The new operator agreed to install 400 new water connections during the fi rst two years of the<br />

contract, which is expected to benefi t 13,000 people.<br />

In small towns and rural areas of Uganda, where 90% of the population lives, water shortages<br />

are part of daily life. In these areas, 60% of the population lacks access to safe water, and waterborne<br />

diseases and infant mortality are widespread. Increasingly, the government of Uganda is<br />

reliant upon private operators to assist in the expansion of access to safe water supply within<br />

the country. These private operators are typically small and medium enterprises that are often<br />

unable to access fi nancing from local banks to operate and expand their businesses.<br />

To help the Ugandan government achieve greater effi ciency and improve access to water,<br />

the IFC was appointed by the Ugandan Ministry of Water and Environment as an Advisor<br />

to the Department of Water Development to assess the feasibility of various public-private<br />

partnership (PPP) options for private operators to increase sustainability and effi ciency in the<br />

distribution of water to small towns and rural areas. The resulting Uganda SSIP Water Program,<br />

initiated in 2007, aimed to structure and implement PPP transactions in fi ve small towns in the<br />

eastern region of Uganda (Kamuli, Nawanyago, Palisa, Tirinyi, and Nankoma), which would<br />

serve as replicable models for the water sector. During implementation of program activities,<br />

an additional fi ve towns, including Busembatia, were added. The program comprised three<br />

components: 1) the design of access to fi nance interventions to facilitate fi nancing for private<br />

operators; 2) transaction structuring and implementation of water PPPs; and 3) provision of<br />

related public sector capacity building interventions for local government offi cials and technical<br />

staff from the Ministry of Water and Environment.<br />

PPIAF SUPPORT<br />

The government of Uganda, together with the IFC, sought Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility<br />

(PPIAF) support in 2009 for a study to assess private operators’ ability to expand service delivery in<br />

Uganda’s water sector. The objectives of the study were to 1) defi ne the characteristics of the private


operators participating in PPPs in Uganda’s water sector; 2)<br />

examine their constraints and potential remedies to improve<br />

their service delivery; and 3) assess the terms and conditions<br />

of private fi nancing available to the private operators. The<br />

study provided recommendations to address the constraints<br />

of high operating costs and lack of access to fi nance, such as:<br />

• Educate banks about private operator operations and activities<br />

to increase assurance of the repayment of loans<br />

• Extend the duration of the management contracts from<br />

three to a minimum of fi ve years to allow private operators<br />

to invest over a longer period and improve service<br />

delivery, as well as re<strong>cover</strong> the initial funds invested in<br />

the water schemes, which would also give their potential<br />

fi nanciers confi dence about the possibility of re<strong>cover</strong>ing<br />

their loans<br />

• Cluster small towns together to improve the viability of<br />

businesses, make supervision more effi cient, and allow<br />

for larger contracts that capture economies of scale<br />

OUTCOMES<br />

The IFC incorporated the recommendations from the PPIAFfunded<br />

study in the Uganda SSIP Water Program. In particular,<br />

the IFC proposed a generic contract with a minimum<br />

term of fi ve years that would appeal to both private operators<br />

and lenders. The IFC also proposed clustering towns<br />

within close proximity to another, but since funding was<br />

eventually only secured for one town, this approach could<br />

not be implemented. Furthermore, the IFC identifi ed alternative<br />

fi nancing models with greater potential for success<br />

including leveraging its relationship with local banks<br />

in Uganda, which were presented with a viable business<br />

model for small-town water operations for the fi rst time.<br />

Findings and recommendations from the study were also<br />

used to design and implement an effective training session<br />

to present information on the Uganda SSIP Water Program<br />

to local banks in Uganda and assess their interest in<br />

providing fi nancing to private water operators. This training<br />

provided a platform where the Ministry of Water and<br />

Environment and the Association of Private Water Operators<br />

could engage for the fi rst time with local banks to describe<br />

the operation of privately-operated water schemes.<br />

The training also addressed weaknesses in the area of<br />

RELATED PPIAF ACTIVITIES<br />

IN UGANDA<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />

contract administration among public sector stakeholders<br />

based on the proposed generic management contract.<br />

Following the training event, two banks expressed interest<br />

to provide pre-fi nancing loans to the pre-qualifi ed<br />

bidders for a tender in Busembatia, one of the small<br />

towns in the Uganda SSIP Water Program. These loans<br />

would be refi nanced by a subsidy provided by the Global<br />

Partnership on Output-Based Aid (GPOBA) upon verifi<br />

cation of the water connections and water supply.<br />

As a result, the fi rst fi ve-year management contract was<br />

awarded in June 2010 for the town of Busembatia to<br />

a private operator, Trandint Limited, who had the lowest<br />

bid with a required subsidy of $270,000 for the expansion<br />

of piped water services. This winning private<br />

operator was able to receive a loan from DFCU Bank, a<br />

Ugandan commercial bank, of approximately $100,000.<br />

DONOR COORDINATION<br />

This PPIAF activity complemented the Uganda SSIP Water<br />

Program, in partnership with the Austrian Development<br />

Agency via the DevCo vehicle. It also complemented<br />

the pilot output-based aid scheme designed and funded<br />

by GPOBA in 10 small towns and rural growth centers.<br />

IMPACTS<br />

The new operator agreed to install 400 new water<br />

connections during the fi rst two years of the contract,<br />

which is expected to benefi t 13,000 people.<br />

• 2000: Country Framework Report, $400,000<br />

• 2007: Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Unit<br />

Feasibility Study, $325,000<br />

• 2009: Private Water Service Delivery Access to<br />

Finance, $74,810


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

November 2011<br />

IMPACT STORIES<br />

PPIAF Helps Peruvian Sub-Nationals<br />

Tap Financial Markets<br />

PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program is helping sub-national<br />

government entities in Peru raise market-based fi nancing for much needed<br />

infrastructure investment. Since 2008, SNTA has assisted eight regional and<br />

municipal entities by facilitating credit ratings, implementing fi nancial assessments<br />

and coaching, supporting transaction preparation, and helping the central<br />

government monitor and evaluate the fi nancial health of local authorities.<br />

As a result of SNTA support, the Municipality of Lima signed a $70 million commercial<br />

bank loan with BBVA Banco Continental in April 2010—the largest market-based borrowing<br />

ever concluded by a sub-national government entity in Peru. The loan was partially backed by<br />

a $32 million IFC guarantee. SNTA technical assistance also helped the Regional Government of<br />

Arequipa obtain a $10 million commercial bank loan in January 2011 to fi nance a regional road<br />

rehabilitation project.<br />

Until 2002, Peru was one of the more centralized countries in Latin America. The government’s<br />

approach to fi scal decentralization was a cautious and gradual one. However, a policy shift in<br />

2002 led to the passage of the Decentralization Framework Law, which established the guiding<br />

principles of a political and fi scal decentralization process.<br />

Because of the limited authority of sub-national governments to raise tax revenues and the<br />

absence of a sub-national debt market, local governments in Peru rely heavily on government<br />

transfers for both operating and capital expenditures. Regional governments, in particular, have<br />

no authority to levy taxes and hence rely almost fully on central government transfers for both<br />

operating expenditures and investments. Municipalities fi nance a higher percentage of their<br />

expenditures from their own sources (e.g., property tax, real estate transaction tax, various fees,<br />

sale of goods and services, etc.), but have no authority to set local tax rates and rely heavily on<br />

government transfers for capital expenditures.<br />

Local governments are exploring options to better leverage their resources in order to meet large<br />

infrastructure investment needs. Currently, borrowing accounts for only 1% of such investment<br />

funding, with virtually all of that in Lima. Commercial banks restrict their activities to fi nancing<br />

working capital for a small number of local governments. To date, the only sub-national bonds<br />

issued securitized Lima’s toll road revenues, allowing for greater investment in roads.<br />

PPIAF SUPPORT<br />

In 2008 and 2009 PPIAF’s SNTA program funded two technical assistance grants designed to facilitate<br />

Peruvian sub-national governments access fi nancing from commercial banks and capital markets, as a<br />

way to complement existing government transfers and revenues, diversify funding sources, lengthen the<br />

maturity of available commercial bank fi nancing, create and strengthen credit histories, and introduce<br />

fi nancial discipline. The objective was to strengthen fi nancial standing and management capacity and<br />

help sub-nationals prepare infrastructure projects for commercial fi nancing.


A workshop on sustainable development plans for provincial<br />

and regional governments was held in April 2010, and<br />

used international examples to demonstrate how access to<br />

market-based fi nance can result from fi scal discipline, sound<br />

fi nancial management, and investment planning. The fi rst<br />

SNTA grant helped the Municipality of Lima obtain a credit<br />

rating from an international credit rating agency, identify<br />

potential sources of fi nance for new infrastructure investments,<br />

and assess ways of replacing existing short-term debt<br />

with sustainable longer-term fi nancing. This work resulted<br />

in compliance with sub-national fi scal prudence rules and<br />

helped Lima make a signifi cant contribution to the Metropolitano<br />

Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project, also supported<br />

by the World Bank and the Inter-American Development<br />

Bank. The second SNTA grant helped the Regional Governments<br />

of Arequipa and Cuzco, the Provincial Municipality of<br />

Santa (Chimbote), the Municipality of Piura, and Arequipa’s<br />

water utility SEDAPAR prepare for and obtain credit ratings<br />

from a local credit rating agency. In the case of the Regional<br />

Government of Arequipa, SNTA’s technical assistance also<br />

included support in navigating the sub-national borrowing<br />

approval process, fi nancial coaching, and a review of technical<br />

documentation.<br />

DONOR COORDINATION<br />

SNTA activities complemented on-going work in Peru by<br />

several donors and international fi nance institutions, including<br />

work by the United Nations on water utility fi nancing,<br />

successful efforts by the International Finance Corporation<br />

(IFC) to establish a sub-national guarantee facility in 2008,<br />

and funding from the World Bank to the central government<br />

for projects executed by regional authorities.<br />

Since 1999 PPIAF, a<br />

multidonor technical<br />

assistance facility, has helped<br />

developing countries use publicprivate<br />

partnerships to improve their<br />

infrastructure. A key focus has been<br />

upstream technical assistance to support<br />

the development of an enabling<br />

environment for such partnerships.<br />

This series highlights how PPIAF’s support<br />

has made an impact on the ground.<br />

OUTCOMES<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />

SNTA’s technical assistance, and close collaboration with key<br />

partners, facilitated a $70 million commercial bank loan to<br />

the Municipality of Lima by BBVA Banco Continental, signed<br />

in April 2010. The loan was partially backed by a $32 million<br />

IFC guarantee. This was the largest market-based fi nancing<br />

ever realized by a sub-national government entity in Peru.<br />

The maturity of this loan was double that of previous debt<br />

incurred by the municipality.<br />

As a result of the second phase of SNTA support, the Regional<br />

Government of Arequipa signed a $10 million loan<br />

with a local commercial bank—the fi rst time a Regional<br />

Government in Peru borrowed without a sovereign guarantee.<br />

As in Lima’s case, the loan was backed by another IFC<br />

guarantee. All other banks invited to arrange the fi nancing<br />

(without IFC’s guarantee) declined interest in the transaction.<br />

With the help of this loan, Arequipa will fi nance its<br />

regional road rehabilitation program.<br />

Other Peruvian authorities supported by PPIAF’s SNTA program<br />

are also advancing steadily toward creditworthiness<br />

and additional transactions are expected.<br />

IMPACTS<br />

By doubling the tenor of the BBVA loan, the Municipality<br />

of Lima’s monthly debt service payments were much more<br />

affordable and left more city revenues available to <strong>cover</strong><br />

critical operating expenses. Important milestones were also<br />

reached in improving Lima’s fi nancial management, such<br />

as the consolidation of the accounts of the Municipality<br />

of Lima and the 19 public companies and other entities it<br />

controls.<br />

RELATED PPIAF/SNTA ACTIVITIES IN PERU<br />

• 2008: Access to Commercial Banks and Capital<br />

Markets (SNTA), $355,296<br />

• 2009: Access to Commercial Banks and Capital<br />

Markets, Phase II (SNTA), $499,776<br />

• 2010: Strategic Plan for the Universal Service Fund,<br />

$75,000<br />

• 2011: Technical Assistance to the Metropolitan<br />

Municipality of Lima (SNTA), $350,000<br />

• 2011: Technical Assistance to Peruvian Water<br />

Utilities (SNTA), $75,000<br />

Learn more about SNTA at<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org/snta


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

April 2011<br />

IMPACT STORIES<br />

SNTA Supports a Water Utility in<br />

Brazil’s Frontier Region<br />

PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) support to the Brazilian water<br />

utility DESO has helped to secure a BRL 18.9 million fi nancing by substantially<br />

improving the company’s ability to interact with fi nanciers. SNTA provided<br />

technical assistance in 2010 to help DESO prepare fi nancial projections and a<br />

credit memorandum on the company. By delivering this forward-looking analysis<br />

to the company and going through the process of discussing the impact of the key<br />

turnaround initiatives in future fi nancials, the company has attracted more interest<br />

from commercial banks to refi nance the company’s BRL 40 million short- and mediumterm<br />

debt.<br />

As a result of SNTA support, a Brazilian water utility in a frontier region became ready to borrow<br />

on commercial terms and, through the fi nancing obtained, gained effi ciencies by reducing<br />

water losses and energy consumption.<br />

The water company owned by the Brazilian state government of Sergipe (“DESO”) had gone<br />

through several years of mismanagement when, in early 2007, the state government decided<br />

to hire professional managers to run the company. Although the results of the management<br />

change were starting to show, the company still did not have access to commercial sources or<br />

to local development fi nance institutions. DESO could not adequately demonstrate the impact<br />

of the fi nancial and operational turnaround being implemented to the potential fi nanciers.<br />

Furthermore, they did not have suffi cient capacity or experience to prepare a forward-looking<br />

view that investors and fi nanciers would normally request.<br />

PPIAF SUPPORT<br />

The state government of Sergipe thus sought assistance from the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory<br />

Facility (PPIAF)’s SNTA program in 2010 to improve the company’s ability to interact with potential fi nanciers.<br />

PPIAF-SNTA quickly brought in a fi nancial consultant to assist DESO in preparing fi nancial projections<br />

and a credit memorandum on the company.<br />

Only a handful of top tier pubic water utilities in Brazil have access to both commercial banking and capital<br />

markets. They have the capacity and experience to prepare information and conduct forward looking<br />

analysis to show their creditworthiness. The rest of the water utilities have much more limited capacity<br />

and experience in dealing with commercial banking and capital markets. Water utilities in the north and<br />

northeast of Brazil lag particularly behind, given the lower income client base and precarious fi nancial<br />

situation, exacerbated by generally weak corporate governance and lack of well trained and skilled staff<br />

on fi nancial assessments. Not all utilities are suited for private management, given the operating environment,<br />

including political sensitivity. In such a case, private fi nancing of infrastructure may be a more<br />

effective way to introduce commercial orientation, better disclosure of fi nancial operational information,<br />

medium-term planning, and even better corporate governance. To this effect, SNTA helped the Brazilian<br />

water utility DESO achieve the following objectives:


• Prepare the key fi nancial and operational information,<br />

including historical and projected fi nancial statements<br />

• Assess and quantify the fi nancial and operational impact<br />

of the proposed institutional development programs<br />

• Compile other key information normally requested by<br />

commercial banks, including environmental and social<br />

practices, corporate governance, insurance policy, etc.<br />

• Provide training to the companies’ fi nance and planning<br />

teams on the use of fi nancial assessments and<br />

projections<br />

OUTCOMES<br />

As a result of the PPIAF-SNTA support, the company was<br />

able to borrow on commercial terms. While the SNTAfunded<br />

activity primarily helped DESO access a BRL 18.9 million<br />

loan from the International Finance Corporation (IFC),<br />

it is expected that, as a result of this assistance, the utility<br />

will also have access to capital market instruments such as<br />

CCB (Brazilian medium-term bond), FIDC (securitization of<br />

receivables), and debentures, which require further disclosure<br />

and better corporate governance.<br />

The appraisal revealed a company with qualifi ed fi nancial<br />

statements and a low operating cash fl ow, but improving at<br />

a fast pace. In addition, the team identifi ed high quality collateral<br />

available to be pledged, which substantially reduced<br />

the credit risk for potential investors. The team mitigated<br />

credit risk with a pledge of receivables from water supply<br />

to one of the largest oil companies in the world (Petrobras)<br />

and receivables from sales to a diversifi ed pool of customers.<br />

Each of these components was expected to exceed debt<br />

service by multiple times. The company also committed to<br />

Since 1999 PPIAF, a<br />

multidonor technical<br />

assistance facility, has helped<br />

developing countries use publicprivate<br />

partnerships to improve their<br />

infrastructure. A key focus has been<br />

upstream technical assistance to support<br />

the development of an enabling<br />

environment for such partnerships.<br />

This series highlights how PPIAF’s support<br />

has made an impact on the ground.<br />

not increase indebtedness and undertook to implement a<br />

plan to eliminate all auditors’ qualifi cations on the fi nancial<br />

statements. To further improve the credit profi le, IFC agreed<br />

to jointly approach local banks to form a syndicate to refi -<br />

nance DESO’s short-term debt.<br />

DONOR COORDINATION<br />

This activity complements World Bank projects in the states<br />

of Sergipe, currently under preparation, and in Rio Grande<br />

do Norte, under execution, which address the states-wide<br />

water resources management issues as well as sector regulatory<br />

issues. Furthermore, the two projects mentioned<br />

above include components for expanding water supply and<br />

wastewater services.<br />

IMPACTS<br />

The BRL 18.9 million project—now fi nanced—will reduce<br />

water losses that were approaching 50% and make customers<br />

more accountable for their water use, which are critical<br />

in a water scarce state, where water for the metropolitan<br />

area is brought from 100 kilometers away. In addition to<br />

saving part of the costs associated with pumping the water<br />

over long distances by reducing water losses, the volume<br />

saved will increase availability of water to the population,<br />

which has recently faced rationing periods.<br />

A subsequent World Bank loan that will be complementary<br />

to the loan fi nanced by the IFC is designed to fi nance<br />

complex and broad water sector institutional reforms at the<br />

state level and investments in water supply, sewerage expansion,<br />

irrigation improvements, and other initiatives with<br />

over 25 years of tenor and at a spread over LIBOR of less<br />

than one tenth of IFC’s spread.<br />

RELATED SNTA ACTIVITIES<br />

IN BRAZIL<br />

• 2008: COMPESA IPO Action Planning, $29,000<br />

• 2008: Strategy for Restructuring of Eletrobras,<br />

$380,000<br />

Learn more about SNTA at<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org/snta<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

May 2011<br />

IMPACT STORIES<br />

PPIAF Supports Private Sector<br />

Participation in the Solid Waste<br />

Sector in Ethiopia<br />

PPIAF has supported the government of Ethiopia in the formulation of a strategy<br />

for private sector involvement in municipal solid waste management. PPIAF<br />

provided funding in 2002 for a comprehensive diagnosis of the solid waste<br />

sector, including generation, collection, storage, transport, and disposal of waste.<br />

These fi ndings were presented at four stakeholder workshops on private sector<br />

participation in the sector, and further insights into international best practices<br />

appropriate for Ethiopia were gained through two study tours to South Africa and Egypt.<br />

As a result of the PPIAF study, in February 2007 the Ethiopian President passed the<br />

Solid Waste Management Proclamation No. 513/2007, which allows private operators to<br />

obtain a permit to engage in the collection, transportation, and use or disposal of waste.<br />

As of April 2011, 524 private enterprises in the Municipality of Addis Ababa have obtained the<br />

necessary permits to perform primary solid waste collection, employing a total of 5,815 waste<br />

collectors. Consequently, the municipality has increased the garbage collection rate from 60% to<br />

80%, resulting in an additional 600,000 residents in Addis Ababa having their waste collected.<br />

Despite deregulation in the 1990s, which permitted increased private sector participation (PSP)<br />

in the provision of infrastructure services, the absence of an appropriate policy and regulatory<br />

environment continued to inhibit PSP. By 2002 municipal solid waste management (SWM) was in<br />

a poor state in Ethiopia. SWM had not been a national priority and investments were minimal;<br />

it existed in some cities but not in most rural areas and there was no overall national strategy<br />

for SWM. Poor waste collection and disposal practices had signifi cant environmental and health<br />

impacts. There was no formal structure for charging waste generators and weak fi nancial and<br />

cost re<strong>cover</strong>y systems were one of the major sources of poor waste management performance.<br />

Thus, there was considerable potential for improvements in SWM performance through<br />

effi ciencies gained from the introduction of the private sector. However, PSP in SWM was<br />

limited to informal pre-collection companies in Addis Ababa and a few other cities. Moreover,<br />

there was virtually no capacity within government to develop appropriate SWM contracts and<br />

to carry out the tendering and evaluation process for PSP.<br />

It was essential that the necessary framework for PSP be developed before contracts were tendered<br />

and the private sector became formally engaged in SWM operations, and it was in this context<br />

that the government requested support from the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility<br />

(PPIAF) for the development of an appropriate strategy and framework for PSP in the SWM sector.<br />

PPIAF SUPPORT<br />

In late 2002 the government of Ethiopia, through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sought<br />

PPIAF support to: 1) provide a diagnostic of the solid waste sector in the country, 2) assess the legal and<br />

institutional changes required for greater PSP in the sector, 3) assess the available opportunities and options<br />

available to EPA for PSP in the sector, and 4) recommend policy, institutional reforms, strategy, and<br />

applicable laws necessary for greater PSP in the sector.


In addition to the diagnostic report, PPIAF funded a training<br />

course on fi nance and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y options in the SWM<br />

sector, four consultation workshops with relevant stakeholders,<br />

and two study tours to South Africa and Egypt<br />

to learn from African experiences of PSP in the sector.<br />

OUTCOMES<br />

Following the PPIAF activity, consensus was achieved on the<br />

value of the incorporation of private sector enterprises in<br />

the solid waste sector. In addition, the PPIAF-funded training<br />

course and study tours increased the technical capacity<br />

of municipality staff to understand the principles of private<br />

fi nancing, operation, and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y in the sector, which<br />

was crucial before staff began supervising the tendering<br />

and evaluation of PSP in the sector.<br />

Subsequently the EPA began a full review of the national<br />

SWM strategy, to incorporate policy provisions for PSP in<br />

SWM generated by the study. As a result, in February 2007,<br />

the President passed the Solid Waste Management Proclamation<br />

No. 513/2007.<br />

The proclamation encouraged urban administrations to create<br />

appropriate enabling conditions to promote private investment<br />

and operation in the provision of SWM services,<br />

and allowed private operators to obtain a permit to engage<br />

in the collection, transportation, and use or disposal of<br />

waste. The objective of the proclamation was to increase<br />

solid waste collection rates to reduce the potential negative<br />

environmental and social impacts of insuffi cient SWM,<br />

and provide economic and social benefi t through increased<br />

private sector involvement in the sector.<br />

DONOR COORDINATION<br />

Together with PPIAF assistance to the sector, other donors<br />

have also been active in the solid waste sector in Ethiopia.<br />

In May 2007 the Agence Française de Développement approved<br />

€5.4 million in funding—out of total project cost of<br />

€27.76 million—for the construction of four transfer stations<br />

to reduce the distance from primary collection sites to<br />

the landfi lls. The main objective of the project is to improve<br />

living conditions in Addis Ababa by supporting the amelioration<br />

of solid waste management and infrastructure.<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />

In addition, in May 2008 the World Bank approved a $145<br />

million loan to support improved performance in the planning,<br />

delivery, and sustained provision of priority municipal<br />

services and infrastructure by urban local governments. The<br />

project includes signifi cant focus on solid waste management<br />

and the provision of related infrastructure, facilities,<br />

and machinery. The activity also provides assistance for urban<br />

local governments interested in entering into service<br />

contracts with private enterprises for the collection of solid<br />

waste.<br />

IMPACTS<br />

The Municipality of Addis Ababa is the largest municipality<br />

in Ethiopia with over 3 million residents. Following the 2007<br />

proclamation, the municipality was divided into 549 collection<br />

zones comprising 800–1000 households, with one private<br />

enterprise assigned to each zone. Service charges for<br />

waste collection are collected as part of water consumption<br />

rates, and payment for the private operators is on a volume<br />

based rate of 30 birr (around $1.75) per m 3 of waste<br />

collected.<br />

As of April 2011, 524 enterprises have obtained the necessary<br />

permits to perform solid waste collection in Addis<br />

Ababa, employing a total of 5,815 operators. These operators<br />

are focused on primary collection of solid waste.<br />

Consequently, in Addis Ababa, the municipality has increased<br />

the garbage collection rate from 60% to 80% and<br />

more than 200,000 tons of waste are now collected each<br />

year. As a result, an additional 600,000 residents in Addis<br />

Ababa now have their waste collected.<br />

RELATED PPIAF ACTIVITIES<br />

IN ETHIOPIA<br />

• 2002: Workshop on Private Sector Participation in<br />

the Water Sector, $71,400


PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />

January 2012<br />

IMPACT STORIES<br />

PPIAF Support to the Enabling<br />

Environment for Public-Private<br />

Partnerships in Malawi<br />

PPIAF support to the government of Malawi has led to a strong legislative and<br />

institutional public-private partnership (PPP) framework that will pave the way<br />

for increased private sector participation in the provision of basic infrastructure<br />

services. PPIAF support began in 2000 to design regulatory and institutional<br />

arrangements for oversight of key infrastructure sectors, which led to legislative and<br />

regulatory reform in the energy sector. In 2005 PPIAF provided additional assistance<br />

to mobilize a national PPP program through the drafting of a PPP Law and PPP policy<br />

framework, and the establishment of a PPP unit. The PPP policy framework was passed by<br />

Cabinet in May 2011, and the PPP Law was passed through Parliament in November 2011. As part<br />

of the new legislation, the Privatization Commission will transition to become the PPP Commission.<br />

In the late 1990s the government of Malawi chose to pursue greater private participation in<br />

and the liberalization of its infrastructure services, with a view to increasing the quality of<br />

and access to infrastructure services while minimizing the drain on public resources. A survey<br />

of the private sector conducted for the 1997 World Development Report had identifi ed the<br />

deterioration of Malawi’s infrastructure to be the principal constraint to private business. In<br />

response, the government began a long process of improving the enabling environment for<br />

PPPs, with the aim of lowering investors’ risk perceptions and increasing government capacity<br />

to develop, implement, and monitor PPP projects.<br />

The government of Malawi had successfully developed a comprehensive policy, legislative, and<br />

institutional framework to serve the needs of its privatization program. However, the concept<br />

of introducing private sector participation in the delivery of public services through PPPs was<br />

still new in Malawi. Thus, the government decided that the establishment of a strategic PPP<br />

framework, consisting of a clear guiding policy, appropriate legal and regulatory provisions,<br />

and an institutional set-up capable of effi cient implementation of PPP projects, was necessary.<br />

Between 2000 and 2007 the government of Malawi sought assistance on three occasions from<br />

the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF) to improve the legal, regulatory, and<br />

institutional framework for private participation in infrastructure.<br />

PPIAF SUPPORT<br />

The government of Malawi requested PPIAF support in 2000 to help design an appropriate regulatory<br />

framework for private participation in infrastructure. The PPIAF-funded report assessed regulatory options<br />

for utilities and recommended the establishment of two new regulatory bodies, a combined energy<br />

and water regulator, and a transport regulator. The activity also designed an appropriate institutional<br />

structure, draft enabling legislation, and an implementation plan for the operationalization of the regulatory<br />

bodies.<br />

In 2005 the government approached PPIAF for further assistance in developing an appropriate PPP framework.<br />

PPIAF provided support to the development of policies, laws, and regulations that defi ned the


scope of authority within the various spheres of government<br />

to enter into PPP contracts. PPIAF also designed an institutional<br />

set-up to support and streamline PPP implementation,<br />

guided by a set of institutional development principles.<br />

Following the recommendations of the 2005 activity, the<br />

government of Malawi requested support for a third time<br />

to establish detailed PPP procedures and guidelines for project<br />

conception, preparation, procurement, and management,<br />

to create the right environment for the transparent<br />

and successful development of infrastructure PPP projects.<br />

In addition to the preparation of the operating procedures<br />

and guidelines for PPP implementation, PPIAF also provided<br />

funds for the drafting of PPP policy framework and the review<br />

of a draft PPP Law.<br />

OUTCOMES<br />

Following the fi rst PPIAF activity, the government passed a<br />

new legal framework for the energy sector, consisting of<br />

the Energy Regulatory Act No. 20 of 2004, the Rural Electrifi<br />

cation Act No. 21 of 2004, and the Electricity Act No.<br />

22 of 2004. The Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority was<br />

established under Act No. 20 of 2004 as Malawi’s energy<br />

sector regulator. The authority’s mandate is to regulate the<br />

energy sector in Malawi in a fair, transparent, effi cient, and<br />

cost-effective manner for the benefi t of the consumers and<br />

operators. In 2007 the fi rst Commissioners of the energy<br />

regulator were appointed.<br />

The second and third PPIAF activities have also garnered<br />

solid outcomes. The operations guidelines and standard<br />

documents and procedures prepared under the PPIAF activity<br />

were subsequently published on the Privatization Commission’s<br />

website. In May 2011 the Public-Private Partnership<br />

Since 1999 PPIAF, a<br />

multidonor technical<br />

assistance facility, has helped<br />

developing countries use publicprivate<br />

partnerships to improve their<br />

infrastructure. A key focus has been<br />

upstream technical assistance to support<br />

the development of an enabling<br />

environment for such partnerships.<br />

This series highlights how PPIAF’s support<br />

has made an impact on the ground.<br />

www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />

Policy Framework was passed by Cabinet, laying out the<br />

government’s commitment to promoting private infrastructure<br />

investment, setting out the policy framework for the<br />

initiation, design, and implementation of PPPs, and promoting<br />

PPPs as a new form of procuring and fi nancing infrastructure<br />

projects and services. In November 2011 the<br />

Malawian Parliament passed “Bill No. 13 of 2011: Public-<br />

Private Partnership.” The law provides the legal framework<br />

for the participation of private entities in government projects.<br />

Following the passing of the PPP Law, the Privatization<br />

Commission will be strengthened and assume new responsibilities,<br />

formally becoming the implementation agency<br />

for PPPs, and will be renamed as the PPP Commission.<br />

DONOR COORDINATION<br />

Several donors are active in support of private sector participation<br />

in infrastructure development in Malawi, including<br />

the World Bank, the UK’s Department for International Development,<br />

and the United States Agency for International<br />

Development.<br />

IMPACTS<br />

Since 2000 PPIAF has supported three activities in Malawi to<br />

identify and defi ne the most appropriate enabling environment<br />

for PPPs. PPIAF is currently providing assistance for the<br />

renegotiation of the concession of the Malawi Rail Network,<br />

and the extension of the railway by Vale. It is expected that<br />

government commitment to the PPP agenda and the sound<br />

enabling environment for PPPs facilitated by PPIAF will help<br />

to build a pipeline of PPP transactions in Malawi.<br />

RELATED PPIAF ACTIVITIES<br />

IN MALAWI<br />

• 2001: Harmonization of the Institutional and<br />

Regulatory Framework, $200,000<br />

• 2005: PPP Legal and Regulatory Framework,<br />

$269,000<br />

• 2006: Create the Enabling Policy and Legal<br />

Environment for Improved Access to Information<br />

and Communication Technology (ICT) Services in<br />

Rural and Remote Areas, $365,000<br />

• 2007: PPP Implementation—Development of<br />

Regulations and Procedures, $251,500


PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund for Middle-<br />

Income Countries<br />

Status Report<br />

April 2012


Overview<br />

Table of Contents<br />

I. Activities Funded through PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

1. Egypt: Improving Private Sector Participation in the Municipal Solid Waste Management<br />

Sector<br />

2. South Africa: Independent Power Producer Regulatory Framework<br />

3. Colombia: Support to Concession Agency (INCO)<br />

4. Vietnam: PPP Viability Study for the Ninh Bin–Than Hoa–Bai Vot Expressway<br />

5. Vietnam: Capacity Building to Review Waste-to-Energy Project Proposals in Ho Chi Minh City<br />

6. Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-Based Contracts for Road Maintenance<br />

7. Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure<br />

8. Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income Housing Projects<br />

9. Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water Supply in Ghana (Phase 2)<br />

10. South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg<br />

11. Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID<br />

System for the Delivery of Public Services<br />

II. Looking Ahead<br />

Annexes<br />

Annex 1: Table of Approved Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-<br />

Core Trust Fund<br />

Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

1


Overview<br />

The PPIAF Trust Fund for Middle-Income Countries was set up in 2010 as a non-core multi-donor trust<br />

fund. It is fully funded by Switzerland and supports a program of country-specific and multi-country<br />

advisory and related activities in selected middle-income countries through the following activities:<br />

� Framing infrastructure development strategies to take full advantage of the potential for private<br />

sector involvement<br />

� Building consensus for appropriate policy, regulatory, and institutional reforms<br />

� Designing and implementing specific policy, regulatory, and institutional reforms<br />

� Supporting the design and implementation of pioneering projects and transactions<br />

� Building government capacity in the design and execution of private infrastructure arrangements<br />

and in the regulation of private service providers<br />

The countries able to benefit from this trust fund are Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, Indonesia, Peru, Vietnam,<br />

and South Africa.<br />

Annex 1 provides more information about the approved activities, and Annex 2 provides a<br />

statement of funding for this trust fund.<br />

I. Activities Funded through PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

Since 2010, PPIAF has supported eleven activities from the Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust<br />

Fund.<br />

1. Egypt: Improving Private Sector Participation in the Municipal Solid Waste Management<br />

Sector ($250,000): this activity was approved on December 2, 2009. Note that the activity was originally<br />

approved ahead of the establishment of the Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund and then,<br />

with SECO's approval, transferred to that non-core fund once it was set up.<br />

The activity is assessing the current state of private sector participation in the Municipal Solid Waste<br />

Management (MSWM) sector in Egypt, in the context of the National Strategy for Integrated Solid Waste<br />

Management, prepared in 2000. It will provide recommendations to increase involvement of the private<br />

sector in the MSWM sector and to improve cost effectiveness.<br />

Recent major political events in Egypt continue to affect the progress of the activity, which had already<br />

completed its first deliverable on schedule (i.e., the initial draft report reviewing the current institutional,<br />

political, legal, and financing environment in Egypt to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the<br />

system). The next steps will require engagement with the government at national and municipal levels to<br />

receive their feedback on the initial report in the development and finalization of a strategic framework for<br />

more efficient, cost effective, and streamlined participation of the private sector in municipal solid waste<br />

management services. The initial draft study report has been widely shared with all stakeholders and a<br />

draft strategic action plan was developed in close collaboration with the Ministry of Local Development<br />

and Ministry of Environment. A consultation workshop is being planned shortly to seek inputs from<br />

various stakeholders on the draft strategic action plan. This workshop has been delayed due to the<br />

parliamentary elections.<br />

An extension was granted until September 2012 to allow time for the completion of the consultations and<br />

also for finalizing the findings of the study. The activity is still of importance to the government.<br />

2


Results to Date of the Municipal Solid Waste Management Sector Activity<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� The report on Private Sector Participation in the<br />

Municipal Solid Waste Management Sector in Egypt was<br />

delivered in September 2010 and <strong>cover</strong>ed: policy and<br />

legal framework, fiscal and economic impacts, social<br />

issues, market conditions, capacity, contract structuring<br />

and procurement, and management. The analysis<br />

guides identification of lessons learnt for more efficient<br />

and effective private sector participation in MSWM.<br />

� The work is the basis for a Strategic Action Plan for<br />

private sector participation in MSWM in Egypt.<br />

3<br />

The activity is ongoing and it is too early<br />

to tell if there are outcomes. PPIAF will<br />

continue to monitor the results to capture<br />

the outcomes and impacts of this activity.<br />

2. South Africa: Independent Power Producer Regulatory Framework ($440,000): this activity was<br />

approved on December 28, 2009. Note that the activity was approved in advance of the establishment of<br />

the Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund, but the implementation of the activity only<br />

commenced after the non-core fund was launched. The activity will <strong>cover</strong>:<br />

� Review of the regulatory work products to date in the government's REFIT Programme, in<br />

particular the Amendments to the Electricity Regulation Act and the National Energy Regulator<br />

Act<br />

� Development of the regulatory environment for licensing<br />

� Review and recommend amendments to legislation relating to Independent Power Producers at<br />

the municipal level<br />

This is a recipient-executed activity by the PPP Unit in the National Treasury of South Africa. Its<br />

implementation was delayed until urgent issues within Eskom (South Africa's power utility) were resolved<br />

around the financing of an urgently needed major base-load power plant. This unavoidably meant a very<br />

slow start for the activity. The National Treasury finalized its evaluation of proposals and the selected<br />

consultant is mobilizing. This activity is ongoing and is expected to be completed by August 2012.<br />

3. Colombia: Support to Concession Agency (INCO) ($249,484): this activity was approved on<br />

February 28, 2011. The activity supported the government of Colombia to improve the planning,<br />

structuring, award process, implementation, management, and regulation of road infrastructure projects<br />

under the concession modality. The assistance concentrated on strengthening the capacity of the<br />

National Institute for Concessions (INCO) to deliver projects able to attract private investment. The activity<br />

recommended changes in the procedures from project preparation to contract management and the<br />

reforms are aimed to help the government to make investments more efficient and transparent. INCO is<br />

now embarked on an ambitious program to develop new projects mainly in roads, railroads, and airports.


Results to Date of the Activity for Support to INCO<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Diagnosis and assessment of existing<br />

concessions program<br />

� Assessment of National Procurement Law<br />

Policies prepared or legal or regulatory changes<br />

recommended<br />

� Guiding recommendations proposed for drafting<br />

National Concessions Law<br />

Plans/strategies prepared<br />

� Proposal defined for management strategy<br />

change for the INCO<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� On-the-job training on international best practice in<br />

PPPs<br />

Knowledge products disseminated<br />

� Notes on international best practice and lessons<br />

learned for Colombia<br />

4<br />

The activity was completed in February 2012. It<br />

is too early to report on many of the outcomes<br />

but PPIAF will continue to monitor results to<br />

capture the actual outcomes and impacts of this<br />

activity.<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� INCO staff with improved capacity in<br />

planning, structuring, award,<br />

implementation, management, and<br />

regulation of road concession contracts<br />

4. Vietnam: PPP Viability Study for the Ninh Bin–Than Hoa–Bai Vot Expressway ($500,000): this<br />

activity was approved on June 23, 2011. It supports the government of Vietnam to evaluate PPP options<br />

for the 220 kilometer Ninh Bin-Than Hoa-Bai Vot (NBBV) expressway section, which forms part of the<br />

Eastern North-South expressway linking Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Can Tho in the Mekong delta, a<br />

total length of 1,811 kilometers. This North-South expressway is the backbone of a planned national<br />

network and will serve the densely populated coastal area of Vietnam. NBBV is the next priority section,<br />

and the PPIAF activity will assess the viability of PPP arrangements, identify the best PPP model, and<br />

establish a standard practice guideline for leveraging private sector resources in expressway<br />

development. Implementation of the activity is underway, and the consultant (Halcrow) is engaged, albeit<br />

with some delays in this process. The current completion date of November 2012 will most likely need to<br />

be revised once the consultant is able to confirm the work schedule.<br />

5. Vietnam: Capacity Building to Review Waste-to-Energy Project Proposals in Ho Chi Minh City<br />

($75,000): this activity was approved on June 30, 2011. The activity supports the Department of Natural<br />

Resources and Environment of the People's Committee of Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) to evaluate the<br />

waste-to-energy project proposals it is considering. This activity will build the Department's capacity to<br />

assess proposed technologies, expected project costs, land use requirements, and the financial capacity<br />

of investors. The project finally selected will provide a cleaner option to the growing problem of solid<br />

waste management. The project will also generate 30 MW of energy to supplement the HCMC grid, which<br />

cannot currently meet growing demand from households and industries. Implementation of the activity is<br />

underway. No issues have been noted so far, and the activity is expected to be completed by June 2012.<br />

6. Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-Based Contracts for Road Maintenance<br />

($40,000): this activity was approved on October 17, 2011. It supports the government of Vietnam to<br />

analyze the current approach to performance-based contracts for road maintenance and to develop a<br />

plan to strengthen these contracts, including the application of relevant best practice from other countries


and the integration of performance-based road maintenance contracts into standard maintenance<br />

practices in Vietnam. Implementation of the activity is underway. No issues have been noted so far, and<br />

the activity is expected to be completed by May 2012.<br />

7. Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure ($75,000): this activity was approved on January 8,<br />

2012. The activity supports the government of Peru on improving the prospects for PPP in irrigation in the<br />

country in general and, more specifically, to provide recommendations on how to improve the<br />

Chavimochic PPP model in order to achieve a successful deal. The activity includes an analysis of the<br />

proposed Chavimochic III PPP model, which is based on the current model at Majes II. The analysis<br />

relies primarily on the existing feasibility studies. That activity is also reviewing the emergence and<br />

evolution of irrigation PPPs in Peru to better understand the political and social "forces" that have led to<br />

the current framework, its weaknesses and strengths, and that will have an impact on possible future<br />

changes. Implementation of the activity is underway. No issues have been noted so far, and the activity is<br />

expected to be completed by September 2013.<br />

8. Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income Housing Projects ($74,800): this activity<br />

was approved on March 4, 2012. It supports the government of Colombia in structuring and developing a<br />

―window‖ to evaluate and screen private Second Generation Macroproyectos. This activity will provide<br />

important support to the government to successfully harness private sector interest in developing the<br />

approximately 7,000 hectares of land identified under the Macroproyectos program. The ―window‖ would<br />

enable the transparent and competitive technical, environmental, social, and financial screening of private<br />

sub-projects that could be structured as PPPs, under which the government commits to providing a partial<br />

supply-side capital investment subsidy of no more than 40% of overall sub-project cost. The activity is<br />

developing a framework for government to analyze such private financing proposals. The activity has only<br />

recently been approved and is expected to be completed by October 2012.<br />

9. Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water Supply in Ghana (Phase 2) ($68,431):<br />

this activity was approved on March 11, 2012. It supports the government of Ghana to undertake a<br />

detailed analysis of the institutional, legal, and financial implications of different options identified by the<br />

government for institutional reform of the urban water sector, aiming to improve the performance and<br />

financial sustainability of the sector. It is seen that such reform will lead to the commercialization of the<br />

sector and increased private sector investment. The activity has only recently been approved and is<br />

expected to be completed by December 2012.<br />

10. South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg<br />

($74,820): this activity was approved on March 20, 2012. It supports the City of Johannesburg in South<br />

Africa to undertake an initial pre-feasibility study to determine the steps and projects that would make up<br />

a comprehensive, sustainable, and integrated cycling program for the city. This includes high-level<br />

options for private sector involvement in the delivery, management, and/or financing of such a program,<br />

including looking at the international experience of bike sharing schemes. The activity has only recently<br />

been approved and is expected to be completed by November 2012.<br />

11. Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID<br />

System for the Delivery of Public Services ($230,620): this activity was approved on March 29, 2012.<br />

It provides assistance to the government of Vietnam to formulate a sound infrastructure development<br />

strategy and build capacity in the design and execution of a PPP e-ID system. The activity is comprised of<br />

three major components: a PPP options study and recommendations; a series of capacity building<br />

activities; and knowledge dissemination. The activity has only recently been approved and is expected to<br />

be completed by April 2013.<br />

5


II. Looking Ahead<br />

There are a number of proposals in the pipeline for this Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund.<br />

Region Title Description Comments<br />

Africa South Africa: Water<br />

Sector<br />

East Asia<br />

and the<br />

Pacific<br />

Latin<br />

American<br />

and the<br />

Caribbean<br />

Vietnam: Pathways for<br />

Private Sector Energy<br />

Investments<br />

Peru: Potential PPP<br />

for Wastewater<br />

Treatment and Reuse<br />

in Ica<br />

Formulation of approaches to address acid<br />

mine drainage; exploring the technical,<br />

institutional, legal, economic, and financial<br />

implications associated with PPP options.<br />

Outcomes would include the reduction of<br />

mine water contribution to the salinity of major<br />

river systems, improvement in water security,<br />

and identification of financing mechanisms<br />

through the re-sale of treated water and<br />

re<strong>cover</strong>y of mineral bi-products re<strong>cover</strong>ed<br />

through the treatment and desalinization<br />

process.<br />

The state electricity utility EVN is facing a<br />

difficult financial situation, which is affecting<br />

its creditworthiness and ability to attract<br />

generation investors. The potential activity<br />

would prepare an action plan and financial<br />

forward looking assessment to improve the<br />

financial strength of EVN and its ability to be<br />

perceived as a credible buyer by private<br />

investors. This would include<br />

recommendations on tariff adjustment<br />

regulations and implementation. This would<br />

benefit not only EVN but also support its<br />

willingness to sign contracts with new<br />

renewable energy projects.<br />

The World Bank and IFC are working with the<br />

Peruvian Business Association of<br />

Manufacturing—Sociedad Nacional de<br />

Industrias (SNI)—on a potential application to<br />

examine the options for developing a<br />

concession to private operators of wastewater<br />

treatment and reuse solutions.<br />

6<br />

Under discussion.<br />

Under discussion.<br />

This had been previously<br />

identified and the<br />

stakeholders have reaffirmed<br />

their intent in<br />

January 2012. Discussions<br />

are still ongoing, and an<br />

application is seen as likely.


Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

Region Title Major Sector<br />

Middle East<br />

and North<br />

Africa<br />

Africa<br />

Latin America<br />

and the<br />

Caribbean<br />

East Asia and<br />

the Pacific<br />

East Asia and<br />

the Pacific<br />

East Asia and<br />

the Pacific<br />

Latin America<br />

and the<br />

Caribbean<br />

Latin America<br />

and the<br />

Caribbean<br />

Africa<br />

Africa<br />

East Asia and<br />

the Pacific<br />

Egypt: Improving Private Sector Participation in the<br />

Municipal Solid Waste Management Sector<br />

South Africa: Independent Power Producer Regulatory<br />

Framework<br />

7<br />

Approval<br />

Amount<br />

Approval<br />

Date<br />

Completion<br />

Date<br />

Status<br />

Solid Waste $250,000 2-Dec-09 30-Sep-12 Ongoing<br />

Energy $440,000 28-Dec-09 31-Aug-12 Ongoing<br />

Colombia: Support to Concession Agency (INCO) Transportation $249,484 16-Feb-11 28-Feb-12 Completed<br />

Vietnam: PPP Viability Study for the Ninh Bin-Than Hoa-<br />

Bai Vot Expressway<br />

Vietnam: Capacity Building to Review Waste-to-Energy<br />

Project Proposals in Ho Chi Minh City<br />

Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-<br />

Based Contracts for Road Maintenance in Vietnam<br />

Transportation $500,000 23-Jun-11 30-Nov-12 Ongoing<br />

Energy $75,000 30-Jun-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />

Transportation $40,00 17-Oct-11 31-May-12 Ongoing<br />

Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure Irrigation $75,000 8-Jan-12 30-Sep-12 Ongoing<br />

Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income<br />

Housing Projects<br />

Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water<br />

Supply in Ghana (Phase 2)<br />

South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program<br />

in the City of Johannesburg<br />

Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the<br />

Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID System for the<br />

Delivery of Public Services<br />

Multi-sector $74,800 4-Mar-12 31-Oct-12 Ongoing<br />

Water $68,431 11-Mar-12 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />

Transportation $74,820 20-Mar-12 30-Nov-12 Ongoing<br />

Telecommunications $230,620 29-Mar-12 30-Apr-13 Ongoing


Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core<br />

Trust Fund<br />

Trust Fund: 71453 - PPIAF Middle-Income Countries - Status as of 03/31/12<br />

Description<br />

Contribution receipts<br />

Add:<br />

Financial information summary (inception to date)<br />

8<br />

Amount in $<br />

7,822,339<br />

Investment income 52,720<br />

Total Income (A)<br />

Less:<br />

7,875,059<br />

Administration fee 2% 156,447<br />

Disbursements made for the approved, ongoing activities 1,622,298<br />

Program Management Unit (PMU) administration expenses*<br />

Funds committed and pending to be disbursed to the task teams by PMU for the ongoing<br />

activities<br />

Total disbursements (B)<br />

Net fund balance (C) = (A) - (B)<br />

List of approved activities to be created in SAP (D)<br />

740,000<br />

328,431<br />

2,847,176<br />

5,027,883<br />

Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg 74,820<br />

Pipeline (E)<br />

PMU costs - additional funds to be allocated 433,351<br />

Fund balance available for new commitments (F) = (C) - (D) - (E) 4,519,712<br />

Add:<br />

Contribution receipts anticipated<br />

(a) Received, but yet to be accounted -<br />

(b) To be received within the next 3 months -<br />

(c) To be received in the next 12 months -<br />

Total receipts anticipated<br />

* PMU Costs:<br />

15% equivalent of contributions received to date<br />

End disbursement date 12/31/2013<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1,173,351


PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response<br />

to the Global Financial Crisis<br />

April 2012


Overview<br />

Table of Contents<br />

I. Regional and Global Activities Funded through PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response to<br />

Global Financial Crisis<br />

1. Feasibility Study for a Middle East and North Africa Islamic Finance Facility for Infrastructure<br />

2. Assessment of Chinese Industrial Zones in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Mauritius<br />

3. Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways<br />

4. Addressing the Challenge of Doing PPPs in Specific Sectors in the Black Sea Region, the<br />

Caucasus, and Central Asia<br />

5. PPP Forum for Accelerating Infrastructure Development in Transport for Francophone Africa<br />

6. Rapid Needs Assessments and Helpdesk Service<br />

7. PPP Workshop Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Recent African Case Studies<br />

8. PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center (PPPIRC) website<br />

II. Country-Specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-Core Trust<br />

Fund<br />

1. India: Preparation of a Business Plan for India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />

2. Ethiopia: PPP Irrigation Model Contracts<br />

3. Sri Lanka: Facilitating PPPs for Infrastructure Development<br />

4. Paraguay: Support for the Design of River Navigation Concessions—Phase II<br />

5. India: Support for Assessment of Public and Private Investment in Infrastructure During the<br />

Financial Crisis<br />

6. India: PPP Options Study for Wastewater Management in Delhi Jal Board<br />

7. India: Review and Analysis of the Proposed Regulatory Framework for the Ports and Airports<br />

Sectors<br />

8. Azerbaijan: National Solid Waste Management Performance Improvement and Private Sector<br />

Participation Strategy<br />

9. Morocco: PPP Unit Support<br />

10. Cambodia: Developing the Universal Access and Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector<br />

11. Turkmenistan: Enhancing Private Sector Participation at the Port of Turkmenbashi<br />

12. Djibouti: Improving the Regulation of Private Operators in the Ports Sector<br />

13. Kenya: PPP Unit Support<br />

14. Rwanda: Independent Review of Energy Generation Investments<br />

15. Uganda: Technical Assistance to Prepare PPP Pipeline<br />

16. Bhutan: Improving the Capacity of the Government to Implement Infrastructure PPPs<br />

17. Malawi: Transaction Advice on Concession Renegotiation of the Railways<br />

18. Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment<br />

19. Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap<br />

20. Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower<br />

Plants<br />

21. Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects Under a PPP<br />

22. Gabon: PPP Program<br />

III. Looking Ahead<br />

Annexes<br />

Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded through the PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-Core<br />

Trust Fund<br />

Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

2


Overview<br />

At the onset of the global financial crisis in the second half of 2008, public-private partnerships (PPPs) in<br />

infrastructure were seeing encouraging trends: private investments had become more evenly distributed<br />

across sectors instead of being concentrated in the more profitable telecommunications sector; and<br />

geographically, larger shares were going to low-income countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and<br />

South Asia. However, when the global financial crisis struck, these trends were disrupted. Some<br />

regions—particularly Eastern Europe and Central Asia—have seen a fall in investments by as much as<br />

40% 1 with a number of projects being delayed or at risk of being cancelled. Higher costs of financing and<br />

the decline of private investors’ risk appetite were a significant cause of these delays and uncertainties.<br />

By end-2009, overall private activity in infrastructure declined.<br />

In 2010 the governments of the Swiss Confederation and the United Kingdom provided funding to PPIAF<br />

for a non-core trust fund for technical assistance to help countries deal with specific problems related to<br />

the global financial crisis. Thirty activities received total funding of $4,269,710 from the PPIAF Non-Core<br />

Trust Fund as a Response to the Global Financial Crisis, with the majority currently under<br />

implementation. These activities aimed at:<br />

� Finding bankable and sustainable solutions in PPPs, taking into account the lessons learned from<br />

the financial crisis<br />

� Supporting governments in developing project pipelines, particularly those that were further left<br />

lagging as a consequence of constrained funding<br />

� Improving the institutional capacity of governments in designing, preparing, and implementing<br />

PPPs to help them be credible counterparts to potential private investors and/or operators<br />

These are important interventions to support PPPs in a post-crisis world where private resources are<br />

scarce and investors have become highly selective. Annex 1 contains the pipeline of these activities,<br />

and Annex 2 provides a statement of funding for this trust fund.<br />

I. Regional and Global Activities Funded through PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as Response to<br />

the Global Financial Crisis<br />

Since 2009 PPIAF has supported eight regional and global activities:<br />

1. Feasibility Study for a Middle East and North Africa Islamic Finance Facility for Infrastructure<br />

($395,000): the activity was approved on February 2, 2010. It conducted a feasibility study to guide the<br />

design and establishment of a sharia-compliant facility, the Arab Financing Facility for Infrastructure<br />

(AFFI), which will enable the financing of cross-border infrastructure projects in the region and provide<br />

technical assistance to client governments to prepare bankable projects. The recommendations of the<br />

study were adopted by key stakeholders, and the facility was subsequently set up and formally launched<br />

at a PPP conference held in Jordan from April 2–6, 2011. The event was attended by delegates from<br />

Arab League countries, as well as development partners such as the World Bank and the Islamic<br />

Development Bank. The AFFI Technical Assistance Window was officially signed and also launched as<br />

part of the conference.<br />

1 PPI Database data update note 42, December 2010<br />

3


Results of the Feasibility Study of Arab Islamic Finance Facility Activity<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Feasibility study of the Arab Financing<br />

Facility for Infrastructure (AFFI),<br />

September 2010<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� PPP workshop and launch of AFFI, April<br />

2011<br />

Institutions created or strengthened<br />

� AFFI launched in April 2011<br />

Consensus achieved and awareness enhanced<br />

� Consensus achieved on the set-up and launch of the<br />

AFFI<br />

� Awareness enhanced on PPPs and the new shariahcompliant<br />

facility, AFFI<br />

2. Assessment of Chinese Industrial Zones in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Mauritius ($99,086): the<br />

activity was approved on June 17, 2010. PPIAF support was mobilized to help address the infrastructure<br />

needs for the four Industrial Zones (Nigeria – Lekki, Nigeria – Ogun, Mauritius – Jinfei Economic and<br />

Trade Cooperation Zone, and Ethiopia – Oriental) by estimating the infrastructural gap that needs to be<br />

fulfilled before the four zones were able to operate. The studies identified possible opportunities for<br />

infrastructure provision by the private sector and the necessary policy framework and enabling<br />

environment that needs to be in place to ensure effective PPP implementation. The work was discussed<br />

with governments, and counterparts in Nigeria and Ethiopia have expressed interest in seeking<br />

assistance from the World Bank Group on the implementation of zone projects in areas such as policy,<br />

legal, regulatory, and institutional frameworks for the development, management, and regulation of<br />

zones; models for public financing; and PPP arrangements for external infrastructure for zones. Mauritius<br />

is also keen to share its successful experience in zone development with other Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

countries, potentially in partnership with other countries. The activity was completed in December 2010<br />

and concrete outcomes are still forthcoming.<br />

3. Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways ($350,000): the updated<br />

and improved Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways (―Highways Toolkit‖) was developed in 2009 by<br />

the World Bank with PPIAF support. Increased demand for PPPs in the roads subsector in Russianspeaking<br />

countries (or where Russian is a major language) indicates the need to facilitate access to the<br />

Highways Toolkit for key stakeholders in those countries. This has become particularly important after the<br />

onset of the global financial crisis, which led to a ―flight to quality‖ of potential investors, and a slowdown<br />

of private participation in infrastructure in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia region, which had been<br />

previously booming. All this makes it all the more important for countries to have a solid pipeline of wellprepared<br />

projects, and a clear strategy on how to attract private investors. The Highways Toolkit was<br />

available only in English at that time. On June 29, 2010, PPIAF provided funding to translate the<br />

Highways Toolkit in Russian for all interested parties (e.g., governments, academia, the private sector,<br />

NGOs) for developing and transitioning economies where Russian is a major language. The activity was<br />

recently completed in early May 2011, and the toolkit will soon be available on the World Bank’s transport<br />

website and on the PPIAF homepage. An initial dissemination workshop was held in Kiev, Ukraine on<br />

April 12, 2011. Apart from introducing the Highways Toolkit to participants, the workshop gave an<br />

opportunity for participants from both the government and private sectors to exchange experiences and<br />

good practices as well as explore lessons learned internationally. The workshop was attended by 38<br />

participants.<br />

4


Results of the Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Knowledge products disseminated<br />

� Russian version of the Toolkit for PPPs in<br />

Roads and Highways, April 2011<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� Dissemination workshop held in Kiev, Ukraine<br />

on April 12, 2011<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� Successfully completed and initially<br />

disseminated in Kiev, Ukraine on April 12, 2011<br />

� Enhanced understanding of 38 participants on<br />

PPPs in highways<br />

4. Addressing the Challenge of Doing PPPs in Specific Sectors in the Black Sea Region, the<br />

Caucasus, and Central Asia ($35,500): the activity was approved on November 16, 2010. The PPIAF<br />

grant facilitated the attendance of 12 representatives in the capacity building event on PPPs, which took<br />

place in Istanbul, Turkey. The request came in light of the need to strengthen the institutional capacity to<br />

undertake PPPs, which was especially acute in the aftermath of the financial crisis, because Eastern<br />

Europe has been one of the regions most affected by the downturn of private financing resources and<br />

decrease activity of private investors.<br />

The workshop was held in Istanbul, Turkey on December 15–19, 2010. Around 50 participants attended<br />

from several countries from the Central Asia, the Caucasus, and the Black Sea regions. A majority of the<br />

participants were members of PPP units in their respective countries, but there were also some<br />

representatives of the private sector from these countries. The workshop helped improve understanding<br />

of PPPs and the issues discussed in the event: risk sharing and sustainable financing of PPPs. These<br />

were of equal relevance to all countries participating in the seminar given a big majority were at the early<br />

stages of developing and implementing their PPP programs.<br />

Results of the Capacity Building Activity on PPPs in Eastern Europe and Central Asia<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� Seminar in Istanbul, Turkey on Addressing the<br />

Challenge of Doing PPPs in Specific Sectors<br />

in the Black Sea Region, the Caucasus, and<br />

Central Asia, December 15–19, 2010<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� Improved awareness and understanding of 50<br />

participants from the Central Asia and Black<br />

Sea Region on PPPs<br />

5. PPP Forum for Accelerating Infrastructure Development in Transport for Francophone Africa<br />

($70,000): this activity was approved in January 2011. The PPIAF grant supported a Regional Forum on<br />

PPP in Transport Infrastructure: Fostering Infrastructure Development in Francophone Africa in Yaoundé,<br />

Caméroun on April 23–29, 2011. The Forum was co-sponsored by the World Bank, the World Bank<br />

Institute, and the Club PPP MedAfrique, in collaboration with the government of Cameroun. The Regional<br />

PPP Forum provided a platform for high-level delegates from Francophone countries in Africa to share<br />

knowledge and exchange good practices and emerging lessons regarding the design and implementation<br />

of PPPs in the region. Around 130 people attended, representing 17 countries in Francophone Africa:<br />

Benin, Burundi, Rwanda, Central African Republic, Congo Brazza, Congo DRC, Mali, Burkina Faso,<br />

Gabon, Chad, Niger, Guinea, Equatorial Guinea, Madagascar, Mauritius, and Mauritania.<br />

5


Results of the PPP Transport Forum in Francophone Africa<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� Forum on PPP in Transport Infrastructure<br />

in Francophone Africa, April 23–29, 2010<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� Improved awareness and understanding of 130<br />

participants from the Francophone Africa on transport<br />

infrastructure PPPs<br />

6. Rapid Needs Assessments and Help Desk Service ($300,000): this activity was approved on<br />

March 10, 2011. The activity was undertaken in response to governments who needed an immediate<br />

analysis of various options available to them in developing PPPs. This activity will provide a quick<br />

intervention to guide senior level government officials in making a decision for more targeted technical<br />

assistance in the sector. An initial rapid assessment was undertaken to determine options for urban water<br />

supply in Ghana. The options identified were developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders and<br />

discussed with the Minister of Water Resources, Works, and Housing in Accra on October 21, 2011. In<br />

December 2011 the government selected three of the options, which focus on strengthening the<br />

governance and performance of the sector by considering different institutional arrangements and<br />

contractual relationships between the main parties, for detailed analysis. The government has requested<br />

further support for the analysis of these preliminary options. A second intervention for the activity consists<br />

of providing technical assistance through a helpdesk, staffed by experts, to PPP units to build capacity to<br />

develop, implement, and manage PPP projects. The helpdesk is currently being carried out as a pilot<br />

project with Uganda’s privatization unit. There are no outputs and outcomes at this moment as the activity<br />

is still underway. The helpdesk has been in operation since April 2011.<br />

7. PPP Workshop Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Recent African Case Studies<br />

($75,000): this activity was approved on March 30, 2011 and aims to co-finance a workshop to create<br />

awareness to African governments on the realities in PPPs and best practices particularly in the aftermath<br />

of the global financial crisis. There has been a widespread recognition in African countries of the benefits<br />

of private market financing of, and participation in, infrastructure projects. This has been driven largely by<br />

factors such as austere budgetary constraints that have limited the public sector’s ability to meet<br />

increasing infrastructure needs and consumer demand for reliable and efficient services. Perhaps, more<br />

importantly, success stories across Africa have encouraged a number of governments to consider a<br />

change in socio-economic paradigm from the traditional welfare state to one where the user pays for<br />

infrastructure services. However, the African dilemma is that governments are constantly faced with<br />

decisions regarding PPPs, but enthusiasm is usually curbed by factors such as the lack of information<br />

about best practices, absence of PPP skills and capacity to properly manage PPP processes, and the<br />

inadequate regulatory and institutional framework. The workshop seeks to bridge the gap between PPP<br />

theory and PPP best practices and was held in Nigeria in November 2011. Government and private<br />

sector stakeholders and practitioners from several African countries including Kenya, Burundi, Southern<br />

Sudan, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Liberia, Cameroun, Senegal, and Gabon attended.<br />

Results of the PPP Best Practices Workshop in Africa<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� Africa: PPP Workshop Best Practices<br />

and Lessons Learned, November 14–15,<br />

2011<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� Improved awareness and understanding of<br />

participants from Africa on best practices and recent<br />

experience of African countries on PPPs<br />

6


8. PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center (PPIRC) website ($332,000) 2 : approved on June 24,<br />

2011, this activity will help the PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center website to enhance its existing<br />

resources—particularly on up-to-date information related to the effects of the global financial crisis on the<br />

PPP contracts. The website, launched in 2009, makes practical PPP infrastructure related resources<br />

publicly available to governments, particularly in the developing world, to assist them with the legal and<br />

contractual issues arising from these complex projects. An assessment of reports, terms of references,<br />

and other relevant references for the website is expected to be completed by May 31, 2012.<br />

II. Country-specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-<br />

Core Trust Fund<br />

In addition to regional activities, PPIAF supported 22 country-specific activities:<br />

1. India: Preparation of a Business Plan for India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />

($218,000): approved on December 1, 2009, this activity aims to help the Infrastructure Finance<br />

Company Limited (IIFCL) update its business plan in the context of market realities following the global<br />

financial and economic slowdown and the PPP financing needs in India. The government of India<br />

established the IIFCL in 2006 under a scheme for financing of infrastructure projects, with a focus on<br />

infrastructure projects domiciled as special purpose vehicles (SPV) and promoted by the private and<br />

public sectors. The IIFCL has been incorporated as a public financial institution designed to borrow in<br />

domestic markets as well as from multilateral financial institutions for on-lending to infrastructure SPV<br />

projects. However, the IIFCL was falling short on capacity in terms of people, processes, and systems for<br />

addressing this rapidly evolving role, which inter alia involves managing complex borrowings from<br />

domestic and international markets and multilateral institutions, and deployment through an increasing<br />

complex set of structures and products. The PPIAF activity aimed at helping the IIFCL to evolve from its<br />

present role, and introduce innovating financing instruments to address the challenge of infrastructure<br />

project financing in India. A market assessment report and business plan for IIFCL was developed in<br />

December 2011 under the PPIAF activity.<br />

Results from Support to the India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform Capacity and awareness building<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Assessment report for infrastructure finance<br />

market, December 2011 Technical capacity enhanced<br />

Plans/strategies prepared<br />

� Business plan for the India Infrastructure<br />

Finance Company Limited prepared,<br />

December 2011<br />

� India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />

strengthened, 2011<br />

2. Ethiopia: PPP Irrigation Model Contracts ($349,000): the activity was approved on February 3,<br />

2010 and is considered a follow-up activity to an earlier PPIAF grant which helped the government of<br />

Ethiopia determine options in delivering irrigation services. An innovative PPP option has been selected<br />

by the government for implementation on a pilot basis. The approach included charging farmers an<br />

Irrigation Service Fee for the full cost of operation and maintenance of the irrigation system—including<br />

energy costs—thereby contributing to making the system financially sustainable. However, in light of the<br />

changes to capital markets and the perception of risk arising from the financial crisis, additional support<br />

was requested to fine-tune the PPP arrangements. The work included drafting the prequalification<br />

2 From the total approved amount of $332,000, only $282,000 has been funded from the SECO/DFID Financial Crisis<br />

non-core fund. The rest of the $50,000 is funded from the Multi-Donor Core Trust Fund<br />

7


documents, information memorandum, model bidding documents, and a model transaction agreement for<br />

the Megech (Lake Tana) irrigation project. The PPP irrigation project at Megech is currently at the bidding<br />

stage. Once implemented, this project is expected to irrigate 5,000 hectares of land, benefitting 10,000<br />

farmers.<br />

Results of the PPP Irrigation Model Contracts in Ethiopia<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Draft prequalification documents,<br />

information memorandum, model bidding<br />

documents, and transaction agreement for<br />

Megech irrigation project, 2011<br />

� Bids have been solicited for a management<br />

contract for the Megech irrigation project, 2011.<br />

The Megech pilot project will irrigate 5,000<br />

hectares of land, benefitting 10,000 farmers<br />

through increased crop yields and productivity<br />

3. Sri Lanka: Facilitating PPPs for Infrastructure Development ($290,000): this activity was<br />

approved on April 29, 2010. PPPs in Sri Lanka are relatively new, with the exception of few Independent<br />

Power Producers and the Colombo Port, but are nevertheless growing in strategic importance for the<br />

government in its plans of infrastructure development. This is of particular importance in the North and<br />

East, where the population is re<strong>cover</strong>ing from decades of conflict and investment shortfalls. The PPP Unit<br />

housed in the Board of Investment of Sri Lanka has been tasked with monitoring and managing the<br />

pipeline of new PPP projects in an effort to respond to the financial crisis, and has received a number of<br />

proposals for such projects. The PPP Unit has been recently formed and currently has only limited<br />

experience and technical capacity. PPIAF provided grant funding to assist the central PPP Unit to identify<br />

any gaps in the legal and regulatory framework in Sri Lanka to develop and implement PPP projects,<br />

specifically in view of the changes in best practice PPPs following the global economic and financial<br />

crisis. It will also help the PPP Unit’s capacity to undertake proper feasibility study for a PPP project,<br />

specifically on a waste management facility in the Western Province of Sri Lanka, and in the overall<br />

project development, monitoring, and oversight of PPPs. The activity has been delayed in implementation<br />

and will be closely monitored by the Program Management Unit.<br />

4. Paraguay: Support for the Design of River Navigation Concessions—Phase II ($168,000): this<br />

PPIAF activity was approved on May 19, 2010. It provided the technical, legal, and economic conditions<br />

of the Pilcomayo-Formosa segment of the Paraguay River and developed the final bidding documents<br />

that will serve as a structure for the future river concession. This activity builds on a Phase I study of the<br />

Rio Apa-Pilcomayo segment of the river. Outcomes are pending as activity recently closed.<br />

5. India: Support for Assessment of Public and Private Investment in Infrastructure During the<br />

Financial Crisis ($47,950): approved on July 27, 2010, the activity’s aim is to review and assess the flow<br />

of economic resources during the financial crisis to Indian infrastructure projects and the impact of the<br />

crisis on progress towards India’s 2007–2012 economic plan. The government later decided to cancel this<br />

activity as an advisory firm, McKinsey, offered to undertake the assessment at no cost.<br />

6. India: PPP Options Study for Wastewater Management in Delhi Jal Board ($168,000): the<br />

activity was approved on August 4, 2010. Contending with the reduced risk appetite of the private sector<br />

in the aftermath of the financial crisis, private sector interest was limited to the power and<br />

telecommunications sectors. The creation of new infrastructure assets—namely in the wastewater<br />

sector—lagged in comparison to other sectors. To keep up the pace of capital investments across these<br />

sectors, the Delhi Jal Board requested assistance from PPIAF to undertake an options study to outline<br />

the various PPP options available to the city to improve its wastewater management for both current and<br />

8


planned activities, and facilitate the bid process to appoint project consultants for implementing such<br />

projects. Implementation of the activity is still ongoing.<br />

Results of PPP Options Study for Wastewater Management in Delhi Jal Board<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Delhi Jal Board Wastewater Management<br />

PPP Options Study, 2011<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� Stakeholder workshops to present the<br />

findings of the PPP options report, June 8,<br />

2011<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� Technical capacity of the Delhi Jal Board<br />

enhanced, 2011<br />

7. India: Review and Analysis of the Proposed Regulatory Framework for the Ports and Airports<br />

Sectors in India ($65,000): approved on August 4, 2010, this activity helped the government of India<br />

review and analyze i) the draft Major Ports Regulatory Authority Act and ii) the consultation paper<br />

―Regulatory Philosophy and Approach in Economic Regulation of Airports and Air Navigation Services,‖<br />

circulated by the Airport Economic Regulatory Authority to ensure they are consistent with international<br />

best practice, appropriately adapted to the local context as well as market realities after the global<br />

financial crisis, and directed towards ensuring efficient, competitive, and effective operation of the ports<br />

and airports sectors.<br />

Results of Analysis of Proposed Regulatory Framework for Ports and Airports<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform Capacity and awareness building<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Regulation of Indian Port Sector report,<br />

2011<br />

� Assessment of the Regulatory Philosophy of<br />

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of<br />

India, 2011<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� Technical capacity of the Ministry of Roads,<br />

Transport, and Highways enhanced, 2011<br />

� Technical capacity of the Airport Economic<br />

Regulatory Authority enhanced, 2011<br />

8. Azerbaijan: National Solid Waste Management Performance Improvement and Private Sector<br />

Participation Strategy ($74,950): approved on December 6, 2010, this activity aims to assist the<br />

government of Azerbaijan in developing a national strategy for integrated solid waste management. The<br />

PPIAF-funded work is envisaged to provide policy recommendations for improving solid waste<br />

management infrastructure, service levels, and financial sustainability through various options, including<br />

private sector participation. Implementation of the activity is still ongoing.<br />

9. Morocco: PPP Unit Support ($245,700): this activity was approved on December 30, 2010 and is<br />

still under implementation. The request for PPIAF funding came in light of the impact of the global<br />

financial crisis on the ability of the government of Morocco to finance critical infrastructure investments.<br />

PPIAF support compliments the IFC PPP advisory role to the government and will specifically aim to help<br />

i) design and establish a dedicated PPP unit within the Directorate for State Enterprises and Privatization<br />

and strengthen the Directorate’s PPP expertise via the organization of seminars, and ii) identify pilot<br />

9


transactions. A number of reports were undertaken under the activity which led to noteworthy initial<br />

outcomes, specifically the establishment of a Moroccan PPP unit in May 2011.<br />

Results of Support to the Morocco PPP Unit<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Review of Legal/Institutional Framework, 2011<br />

� Analysis of Tools for Public and Private<br />

Financing of PPP Infra Projects, 2011<br />

� Analysis of Administrative Constraints to PPP<br />

Projects, 2011<br />

� International Benchmarking of PPP Unit, 2011<br />

Plans/strategies prepared<br />

� PPP unit functions and organization plan<br />

Project cycle-related assistance<br />

Transaction support<br />

� Report from rapid screening missions to<br />

identify pilot PPP transactions in the health<br />

sector, 2011<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� PPP Seminar held in February 2011 to build<br />

consensus between the Moroccan Ministry of<br />

Finance and all interested line ministries on<br />

the role of the PPP unit<br />

Institutions created or strengthened<br />

� Moroccan PPP Unit (part of the Ministry of<br />

Finance) created in May 2011<br />

Plans/strategies adopted<br />

� PPP unit functions and organization plan<br />

adopted<br />

Consensus achieved<br />

� Consensus achieved on role of PPP Unit, May<br />

2011<br />

10. Cambodia: Developing the Universal Access and Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector<br />

($110,000): this activity was approved on December 31, 2010 and aims to assist the Ministry of Posts<br />

and Telecommunications of Cambodia in developing a universal access/service (UAS)<br />

telecommunications policy framework. Though telecommunications continue to be an attractive sector to<br />

investors even in a constrained environment brought by the effects of the global financial crisis, providing<br />

services to remote rural areas are considered daunting. This activity is expected to provide a platform for<br />

the government of Cambodia to bridge the urban-rural divide and an opportunity to extend the gains to<br />

those who are most in need. The PPIAF activity recently closed and the work that was undertaken<br />

revealed that affordability constraints would need to be taken into account in developing Cambodia’s UAS<br />

framework, especially the potential set-up of a universal access fund, which is normally used for<br />

infrastructure supply. As a result, the scope of the PPIAF-funded work has been narrowed down to look at<br />

the feasibility of telecenters as part of the UAS strategy and identify initiatives that would reduce the<br />

service price paid by the consumers (including public institutions) and review elements of the existing<br />

regulatory regime that impact affordability and usage.<br />

11. Turkmenistan: Enhancing Private Sector Participation at the Port of Turkmenbashi ($150,000):<br />

this activity was approved on January 19, 2011 and is currently under implementation. The Port of<br />

Turkmenbashi is the primary port in Turkmenistan, and hence has a significant role in that it could<br />

enhance and sustain economic growth in the country. Because of its geographic location, the Port of<br />

Turkmenbashi could serve as a major logistics center linking Asian and Western markets. To achieve this<br />

goal, the government of Turkmenistan requested PPIAF support to help them engage the private sector<br />

to provide management experience, connections to the global maritime network, and shoulder some<br />

commercial, financial, and operational risks in transforming the Port. The PPIAF activity will undertake i)<br />

10


an assessment and recommendations for introducing PPPs in the Port of Turkmenbashi, and ii) provide<br />

recommendations on the revision of the Port Law.<br />

12. Djibouti: Improving the Regulation of Private Operators in the Ports Sector ($74,500): approved<br />

on February 14, 2011, this activity aims to strengthen the competitiveness of the ports of Djibouti (old port<br />

of Djibouti and new port of Doraleh) and ensure their medium- and long-term development by designing a<br />

modern and efficient regulation system for private port operators, and specifically addressing issues<br />

related to the quality of service and pricing, in addition to institutional related issues. Progress has been<br />

delayed due to change in government counterpart and the government’s decision to take back the<br />

management of the old port due to a strain in the relationship with the existing port contractor.<br />

13. Kenya: PPP Unit Support ($124,240): the activity was approved on February 23, 2011. At the<br />

request of the government, a PPIAF activity is currently providing advice and support to the PPP<br />

Secretariat in Kenya in fulfillment of its mandate to ministries, departments, and government agencies to<br />

identify and develop PPP projects; and helping contracting authorities review the work of PPP transaction<br />

advisors. This support will include the PPP Unit’s coordination of PPP information dissemination, training<br />

and capacity building, as well as the development of the PPP institutional procedures, including a revised<br />

PPP Guidance Manual. The work has been delayed and no outputs and outcomes are yet available.<br />

14. Rwanda: Independent Review of Energy Generation Investments ($74,500): this activity was<br />

approved on February 28, 2011. PPIAF funding was requested to help the government of Rwanda<br />

identify priority generation projects to be able to establish a pipeline of commercially-sound energy<br />

generation investments that can be undertaken through a PPP. The activity is currently under<br />

implementation. A diagnostic report was prepared and a list of priority generation projects was<br />

recommended. Since the activity has just recently been concluded, concrete outcomes have not yet been<br />

attained.<br />

15. Uganda: Technical Assistance to Prepare PPP Pipeline ($70,000): approved on April 7, 2011, this<br />

activity will help identify and prioritize potential PPP projects that can be implemented by the government<br />

of Uganda. The activity is still under implementation and will compliment the ongoing helpdesk activity<br />

where Uganda is the pilot country for the project.<br />

16. Bhutan: Improving the Capacity of the Government to Implement Infrastructure PPPs<br />

($167,450): this activity was approved on June 30, 2011. This ongoing PPIAF activity will help assess<br />

Bhutan’s capacity needs with respect to infrastructure PPP development and propose a roadmap for<br />

improved PPP capability in Bhutan.<br />

17. Malawi: Transaction Advice on Concession Renegotiation of the Railways ($166,156): the<br />

activity was approved on June 30, 2011 and is currently under implementation. The activity will review the<br />

current railway concession, propose modifications accordingly, and frame it in such away to ensure<br />

positive involvement of the concessionaire and assist the government of Malawi in the renegotiation of<br />

the concession agreement for the Malawi Railway Network. The PPIAF activity will also advise the Malawi<br />

government on rail infrastructure, commercial, regulatory, and financial aspects of the proposed<br />

concession for Railway Extension from Nkaya to Mwanza by Vale.<br />

18. Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment ($459,275): approved on October 24, 2011, this activity will<br />

assist the government of Djibouti to refine its energy sector master plan, asses the cost of refurbishing<br />

existing generation plants, and identify least-cost infrastructure investments that can be effectively<br />

financed and managed through a PPP. Implementation of this activity is still ongoing.<br />

11


19. Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap ($75,000): this ongoing activity was approved on<br />

October 30, 2011. This activity will develop a strategic policy roadmap to guide the development of<br />

Bhutan's telecom sector specifically in introducing competition, determining the divestment policies to<br />

promote strategic investment by foreign investors, and developing a transformation agenda to use the<br />

telecom sector for cost-effective service delivery.<br />

20. Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower<br />

Plants ($75,000): this activity was approved on December 15, 2011. IFC recently signed a mandate with<br />

the government of Albania to act as a lead advisor for privatization of four existing hydropower plants:<br />

Bistrica 1 (25MW) and Bistrica 2 (5 MW) on River Bistrica, and Ulza (25.2MW) and Shkopeti (25MW) on<br />

River Mati. In light of this transaction, the government requested PPIAF support to undertake additional<br />

assessments to maximize privatization proceeds from the sale of the hydropower plants and attract<br />

credible investors. An environmental assessment of the project to identify any environmental risks<br />

stemming and propose mitigation measures will be undertaken under the PPIAF activity, along with<br />

technical diagnostics on the conditions of the civil, mechanical, hydraulic, and electrical components of<br />

the hydropower plants.<br />

21. Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects Under a PPP Model ($64,450):<br />

this activity was approved on January 12, 2012. The Royal Government of Bhutan is currently<br />

implementing its 10 th Five-Year Plan (10FYP, 2008–2013) which has a central focus on poverty reduction<br />

and envisages a wider role for the private sector in the implementation of its development goals. The<br />

PPIAF activity will undertake a preliminary assessment of potential infrastructure projects to develop a<br />

pipeline of feasible PPP transactions, including preparing a preliminary assessment of the feasibility of<br />

several infrastructure projects.<br />

22. Gabon: PPP Program ($74,640): approved on February 7, 2012, this activity will enable the<br />

government of Gabon to advance its PPP agenda from both a transaction and enabling environment<br />

stand point. Specifically, it will assess and recommend improvements in Gabon’s PPPs pipeline, provide<br />

targeted policy recommendations on improving the legal, regulatory, and institutional and policy<br />

arrangements, and present options for creating the institutional and human expertise on PPPs either<br />

through the establishment of a PPP unit or an inter-institutional commission.<br />

12


Annex 1: Approved Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response to the Global<br />

Financial Crisis<br />

Region Title Major Sector<br />

South Asia<br />

Middle East &<br />

North Africa<br />

India: Preparation of a Business Plan for India<br />

Infrastructure Finance Company Limited (IIFCL)<br />

Middle East and North Africa: Feasibility Study for<br />

MENA Islamic Finance Facility for Infrastructure<br />

13<br />

Approval<br />

Amount<br />

Approval<br />

Date<br />

Completion<br />

Date<br />

Status<br />

Multi-sector $218,000 1-Dec-09 30-Dec-11 Completed<br />

Multi-sector $395,000 2-Feb-10 30-Sep-11 Completed<br />

Africa Ethiopia: PPP Irrigation Model Contracts Water $74, 923 3-Feb-10 30-Sep-10 Completed<br />

South Asia<br />

Latin America &<br />

the Caribbean<br />

Africa<br />

Global<br />

South Asia<br />

South Asia<br />

South Asia<br />

Europe and<br />

Central Asia<br />

Europe and<br />

Central Asia<br />

Middle East &<br />

North Africa<br />

East Asia &<br />

Pacific<br />

Sri Lanka: Facilitating PPPs for Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Paraguay: Support for the Design of River Navigation<br />

Concessions – Phase II<br />

Africa: Assessment of Chinese Industrial Zones in<br />

Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Mauritius<br />

Global: Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in<br />

Roads and Highways<br />

India: Support for Assessment of Public and Private<br />

Investment in Infrastructure During the Financial Crisis<br />

India: PPP Options Study for Waste Water<br />

Management in Delhi Jal Board<br />

India: Review and Analysis of the Proposed<br />

Regulatory Framework for the Ports and Airports<br />

sector in India<br />

Europe and Central Asia: Addressing the Challenge of<br />

doing PPPs in Specific Sectors in the Black Sea<br />

Region, the Caucasus, and Central Asia<br />

Azerbaijan: National Solid Waste Management<br />

Performance Improvement and Private Sector<br />

Participation Strategy<br />

Multi-sector $290,000 29-Apr-10 15-Jan-13 Ongoing<br />

Transportation $186,000 19-May-10 30-Sep-10 Completed<br />

Multi-sector $99,086 17-Jun-10 31-Dec-10 Completed<br />

Transportation $20,000 29-Jun-10 30-Nov-11 Completed<br />

Multi-sector $47,950 27-Jul-10 30-Jun-11 Cancelled<br />

Water $73,390 4-Aug-10 31-Oct-11 Completed<br />

Transportation $65,000 4-Aug-10 30-Jun-11 Completed<br />

Multi-sector $35,500 16-Nov-10 30-Apr-11 Completed<br />

Water $74,950 6-Dec-10 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />

Morocco: PPP Unit Support Multi-sector $245,700 30-Dec-10 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />

Cambodia: Developing the Universal Access and<br />

Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector<br />

Telecommunications $110,000 31-Dec-10 31-Aug-11 Completed


Africa<br />

Region Title Major Sector<br />

Europe &<br />

Central Asia<br />

Middle East &<br />

North Africa<br />

Africa: PPP Forum for Accelerating Infrastructure<br />

Development in Transport for Francophone Africa<br />

Turkmenistan: Enhancing Private Sector Participation<br />

at the Port of Turmenbashi<br />

Djibouti: Improving the Regulations of Private<br />

Operators in the Port Sector<br />

14<br />

Approval<br />

Amount<br />

Approval<br />

Date<br />

Completion<br />

Date<br />

Status<br />

Transportation $70,000 8-Jan-11 30-May-11 Completed<br />

Transportation $150,000 19-Jan-11 30-Apr-13 Ongoing<br />

Transportation $74,500 14-Feb-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />

Africa Kenya: PPP Unit Support Multi-sector $124,240 23-Feb-11 31-Aug-12 Ongoing<br />

Africa<br />

Cross-Regional<br />

Africa<br />

Africa<br />

Global<br />

South Asia<br />

Africa<br />

Rwanda: Independent Review of Energy Generation<br />

Investments<br />

Cross-Regional: Rapid Needs Assessment and Help<br />

Desk Service<br />

Africa: PPP Workshop Best Practices and Lessons<br />

Learned from Recent African Case Studies<br />

Uganda: Technical Assistance to Prepare PPP<br />

Pipeline<br />

Global: PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center<br />

(PPPIRC) Website<br />

Bhutan: Improving the Capacity of the Government to<br />

Implement Infrastructure PPPs<br />

Malawi: Transaction Advice on Concession<br />

Renegotiation of the Railways<br />

Energy $74,500 28-Feb-11 30-Sep-11 Completed<br />

Multi-sector $300,000 10-Mar-11 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />

Multi-sector $75,000 30-Mar-11 31-Dec-11 Completed<br />

Multi-sector $70,000 7-Apr-11 31-Mar-12 Ongoing<br />

Multi-sector $332,000 24-Jun-11 30-Jun-13 Ongoing<br />

Multi-sector $167,450 30-Jun-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />

Transportation $166,156 30-Jun-11 14-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />

South Asia Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap Telecommunications $75,000 30-Aug-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />

Middle East &<br />

North Africa<br />

Europe and<br />

Central Asia<br />

South Asia<br />

Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment Energy $459,275 24-Oct-11 31-Oct-12 Ongoing<br />

Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica<br />

2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower Plants<br />

Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure<br />

Projects Under a PPP Model<br />

Energy $75,000 15-Dec-11 30-Sep-12 Ongoing<br />

Multi-sector $64,450 12-Jan-12 30-Nov-12 Ongoing<br />

Africa Gabon: PPP Program Multi-sector $74,640 7-Feb-12 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />

Total $4,296,710


Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a<br />

Response to the Global Financial Crisis<br />

Trust Fund: 71466 - PPIAF Financial crisis - Status as of 03/31/12<br />

Description<br />

Contribution receipts<br />

Add:<br />

Investment Income<br />

Total Income (A)<br />

Less:<br />

Financial information summary (inception to date)<br />

15<br />

Amount in $<br />

7,507,918<br />

55,231<br />

7,563,149<br />

Administration fee 2% 150,158<br />

Disbursements made for the approved, ongoing activities 3,657,338<br />

Program Management Unit (PMU) administration expenses* 714,090<br />

Funds committed and pending to be disbursed to the task teams by PMU for the<br />

ongoing activities 315,275<br />

Total disbursements (B) 4,836,861<br />

Net fund balance (C) = (A) - (B) 2,726,288<br />

List of approved activities to be created in SAP (D)<br />

Support to PPP Program in Gabon 74,640<br />

Pipeline (E)<br />

PMU costs – additional funds to be allocated -<br />

Fund balance available for new commitments (F) = (C) – (D) – (E) 2,651,648<br />

Add:<br />

Contribution receipts anticipated<br />

(a) Received, but yet to be accounted -<br />

(b) To be received within the next 3 months -<br />

(c) To be received in the next 12 months<br />

Total receipts anticipated -<br />

* PMU Costs:<br />

Total PMU cost allowed per the agreement 714,090<br />

End disbursement date 12/31/2013


PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund on Integrating<br />

Climate Change Agenda with Public-Private<br />

Partnerships<br />

Status Report<br />

April 2012


Overview<br />

Table of Contents<br />

I. Regional Climate Change Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust<br />

Fund<br />

1. Compact Fluorescent Lamp Waste Management in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

2. Impact of Climate Change on the Transport Sector in Africa<br />

3. Lighting Africa Policy Issues<br />

4. Capacity Building Seminar on Geothermal Energy<br />

5. African Energy Ministers’ Conference<br />

6. Lighting Africa Expansion<br />

II. Country-Specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

1. South Africa: South African Cities Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program<br />

2. Côte d’Ivoire: Strategic Framework for the Development of Transport Infrastructure<br />

3. Kenya: Due Diligence for the Lake Turkana Wind Project<br />

4. Mali: Legal Advisory Services to the government of Mali for Scatec Solar Project<br />

III. Looking Ahead<br />

Annexes<br />

Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded through the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

1


Overview<br />

The PPIAF Trust Fund on Integrating Climate Change Agenda with Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)<br />

was set up in 2008 as a non-core multi-donor trust fund. This Trust Fund, funded by Norway and more<br />

recently by the Netherlands, aims to mainstream considerations of climate change externalities and<br />

opportunities with existing work in improving the delivery of infrastructure services. Four out of the ten<br />

activities funded through the Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund are currently under implementation.<br />

Annex 1 contains the pipeline of these activities, and Annex 2 provides a statement of funding for<br />

this trust fund.<br />

I. Regional Climate Change Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core<br />

Trust Fund<br />

Since 2009, PPIAF has supported six regional climate change activities in the transport and energy<br />

sectors in Africa.<br />

1. Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL) Waste Management in Sub-Saharan Africa ($170,000): this<br />

activity was approved on April 28, 2009. It supports a study that examines issues and options related to<br />

the proper disposal and recycling of mercury-containing lamps, and aims to enhance private sector<br />

participation and to mitigate environmental and health impacts of CFLs disposal. Implementation of the<br />

CFL waste management activity progressed steadily since its inception in June 2009, and the activity was<br />

completed in March 2011. The final report of the study provided a comprehensive analysis of sanitary<br />

risks induced by CFL distribution programs in Africa, and an analysis of practical options to deal with the<br />

issues of collecting and recycling mercury-contained lamps, including an enhanced role for the private<br />

sector for proper waste management. Among the recommendations of the study are: 1) to promote a<br />

strong and sustainable market penetration of readily available high-quality lamps; 2) to avoid mercury<br />

emissions by capture and confinement solutions that include proper landfilling; and 3) to control the<br />

impact of mercury emissions by applying waste management best practices.<br />

The activity also delivered six country case studies (Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Senegal,<br />

South Africa, and Uganda), which were showcased in the World Bank Compact Fluorescent Lamps toolkit<br />

funded through the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP). The results achieved by<br />

this activity are summarized in the table below.<br />

Results of the CFL Waste Management Activity<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Study of mercury-containing lamp<br />

waste management in Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa, December 2010<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Knowledge products disseminated<br />

� Dissemination of a Compact<br />

Fluorescent Lamps toolkit, available<br />

online. 1<br />

� The activity was completed on March 31, 2011. It is too<br />

early to report on some of the outcomes. PPIAF will<br />

continue to monitor results to capture the actual outcomes<br />

and impacts of this activity.<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� The CFL toolkit is being widely disseminated. The six<br />

country case studies have been integrated in the toolkit to<br />

enhance the technical capacities of decision-makers in<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa to design appropriate frameworks for<br />

CFL waste management.<br />

1 http://www.esmap.org/esmap/sites/esmap.org/files/CFL_Toolkit_Web_Version_102110_REVISED_FINAL.pdf<br />

2


2. Impact of Climate Change in the Transport Sector in Africa ($261,500): this activity was approved<br />

on May 27, 2009. It built on the ongoing work of the Sub-Saharan Africa Initiative to respond to the impact<br />

of climate change on the transport sector, and aimed to examine mitigation and adaptation measures<br />

needed to make climate-resilient transport systems in Africa. The activity was successfully implemented<br />

despite initial delays in the procurement process, and the study was completed in January 2011. It<br />

produced a guideline framework for upstream PPP work needed to address mitigation in Ghana and<br />

adaptation in Ethiopia and Mozambique.<br />

The preliminary findings of the study were presented to key practitioners in the African transport sector<br />

during a workshop held in Kampala, Uganda in October 2010, and during the World Bank’s Transport<br />

Forum held in Washington, DC in March 2011.<br />

Based on the recommendations of the study, the government of Ghana developed the Ghana Urban<br />

Transport project in April 2011 with the aim to improve mobility through a combination of traffic<br />

engineering measures, regulation of the public transport industry, and implementation of a bus rapid<br />

transit system. It is expected that the project increases the use of lower-emission transport along a pilot<br />

corridor in Accra.<br />

Results of the Impact of Climate Change on the Transport Sector in Africa Activity<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Study on transport climate-resilience in<br />

Ghana, Ethiopia, and Mozambique,<br />

December 2010<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

Knowledge products disseminated<br />

� Dissemination of case studies on climate<br />

change adaptation and mitigation in the<br />

transport sector in Ghana, Ethiopia, and<br />

Mozambique, October 2010–March 2011<br />

� In April 2011 the government of Ghana developed<br />

the Ghana Urban Transport project, which is<br />

expected to increase the use of lower emission<br />

transport in Accra<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� The two dissemination workshops held in Kampala<br />

in October 2010 and in Washington, DC, in March<br />

2011, helped raise the awareness of policy makers<br />

and potential private investors how Africa’s road<br />

transport sector could adapt to climate change.<br />

3. Lighting Africa Policy Issues ($350,000): this activity was approved on August 12, 2009. It is a<br />

follow-up to the Lighting Africa Conference and Development Marketplace Competition held in Accra,<br />

Ghana, on May 5–8, 2008. PPIAF was a key sponsor of the Lighting Africa Development Marketplace<br />

competition that selected 16 organizations for the development and delivery of improved lighting products<br />

and services for Sub-Saharan Africa. Lighting Africa is a joint World Bank and IFC program that seeks to<br />

accelerate the development of markets for modern off-grid lighting products in Sub-Saharan Africa where<br />

an estimated 10–30% of household incomes are spent on hazardous and low quality fuel-based lighting<br />

products.<br />

The PPIAF grant supported a study on key policy and regulatory issues affecting adoption and scale-up<br />

of clean, low-cost lighting products, and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />

Country policy reports were prepared for eight countries in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cameroon, Democratic<br />

Republic of Congo, Ghana, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Senegal. The preliminary findings of<br />

the study were presented to African policy and decision-makers at a workshop held in Nairobi, Kenya in<br />

3


May 2010. Key issues addressed during the workshop were policy and regulatory barriers and the<br />

mobilization of finance and business support services. The following lessons have been also learned:<br />

lighting products need to be 1) easy to use and understand; 2) seen as relevant and capable of delivering<br />

their promised service; and 3) affordable and offer good value for money.<br />

Recommended policy interventions include:<br />

� Incorporate modern lighting strategies into overall government development and poverty<br />

reduction strategy<br />

� Adjust regulatory environments to favor modern lighting solutions<br />

� Support a market transition to high-quality products<br />

� Facilitate a competitively priced supply chain that delivers lighting products to all segments of the<br />

market<br />

� Ensure that the widest possible access to modern lighting is achieved, particularly among the<br />

poor<br />

The implementation of this activity was completed in June 2011.<br />

Results of the Lighting Africa Policy Issues Activity<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Study on Lighting Africa Policy Issues; country<br />

reports for Cameroon, Democratic Republic of<br />

Congo, Ghana, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Kenya,<br />

Tanzania, and Senegal, December 2010<br />

� Policy note summarizing the findings of the<br />

countries studies, August 2011<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� Regional workshop held in Nairobi, Kenya, on<br />

May 18–20, 2010<br />

� PPIAF will monitor results to capture the actual<br />

outcomes and impacts of the activity.<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� During the workshop, dozens of African policy<br />

makers and other key stakeholders in the energy<br />

sector discussed opportunities to scale up the<br />

use of renewable energies in Africa<br />

4. Capacity Building Seminar on Geothermal Energy ($30,000): this activity was approved on<br />

December 30, 2010. The PPIAF grant helped enhanced the capacity of five senior officials from Kenya,<br />

Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Djibouti on geothermal energy, as these countries strive to exploit this<br />

untapped natural resource. The five policy makers were sponsored by PPIAF to participate in a training<br />

seminar on held in Iceland in January 2011, organized by the African Development Bank. The seminar<br />

helped them get a clearer understanding of how to handle geothermal development issues with the<br />

involvement of the private sector. All five countries are developing a pipeline of geothermal projects with<br />

private sector participation. Kenya, the largest producer of geothermal power in Africa, is looking at<br />

increasing the participation of the private sector in the supply of energy to surpass hydropower as the top<br />

contributor to the country’s electricity grid by 2014. Kenya is developing a $1.3 billion, 280 MW,<br />

geothermal project that could help the country meet the growing demand for electricity.<br />

4


Results of the Capacity Building Activity on Geothermal Energy<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� Capacity building seminar held in<br />

Reykjavík, Iceland on January<br />

13–16, 2011<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� Five African policy makers attended a seminar on geothermal<br />

energy held in Reykjavík, Iceland, on January 13–16, 2011<br />

where they learned how to develop tools to implement<br />

geothermal projects in their countries<br />

5. African Energy Ministers’ Conference ($40,000): this activity was approved on August 23, 2011.<br />

The objective was to facilitate the formation of consensus on priorities for supporting Africa’s low carbon,<br />

climate resilient energy development agenda, including in the context of climate change negotiations. The<br />

two-day Ministerial Conference, co-sponsored by PPIAF, was held in Johannesburg, South Africa on<br />

September 15 and 16, 2011. The conference provided an important platform for high-level policy dialogue<br />

to build consensus and catalyze action for sustainable energy access across the African continent. In<br />

addition, it highlighted Africa’s energy challenges and critical energy investment priorities that need to be<br />

addressed.<br />

Results of the African Energy Ministers’ Conference Activity<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� African Energy Ministers’ Conference held in Johannesburg,<br />

South Africa on September 15 and 16, 2011<br />

Knowledge products disseminated<br />

� Background papers and briefing notes on key thematic areas;<br />

Proceedings Report summarizing the Conference; Regionalbased<br />

action plan document with key participating parties<br />

5<br />

Consensus achieved<br />

� Consensus achieved on priorities<br />

for supporting Africa’s low<br />

carbon, climate resilient energy<br />

development agenda<br />

6. Lighting Africa Expansion ($250,000): this activity was approved on December 5, 2011 to help the<br />

Lighting Africa program scale-up its activities in Sub-Saharan Africa. The program leveraged $500,000<br />

from the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) and the Global Partnership on<br />

Output-Based Aid (GPOBA). The purpose of this activity is to accelerate the adoption of affordable, clean<br />

low-carbon off-grid lighting technologies to bottom of the pyramid households and businesses throughout<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa that rely on candles, kerosene, and other environmentally harmful fuels for their<br />

lighting needs.<br />

The PPIAF grant will finance the development of national off-grid lighting programs in selected countries.<br />

It is expected that the total of up to eight countries can be reached with the available funds. The focus will<br />

be on countries where the private market is expected to be strongest, such as Nigeria, Tanzania,<br />

Senegal, and Mali, as well as on post-conflict countries where the needs are strongest (e.g., South<br />

Sudan, Liberia, Rwanda, and Democratic Republic of Congo).


The proposed activity will leverage earlier PPIAF support, including Lighting Africa Development<br />

Marketplace and Policy and Regulatory Study, by scaling up the benefits of Lighting Africa to additional<br />

households in new countries.<br />

The expected closing date for this activity is September 30, 2013. PPIAF will monitor results to capture<br />

the actual outcomes and impacts of the activity.<br />

II. Country-specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust<br />

Fund<br />

In addition to regional activities, PPIAF supported four country-specific climate change activities in South<br />

Africa, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, and Mali.<br />

1. South Africa: South African Cities Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program<br />

($400,000): this activity was approved on August 27, 2009. It aims to support the South African Cities<br />

Network to implement a renewable energy and energy efficiency program for improved infrastructure<br />

development through private investment across nine South African cities.<br />

The activity included a component on pre-feasibility studies to help prepare renewable energy and energy<br />

efficiency (REEE) within South Africa’s municipalities in order to mitigate climate change from the bottomup<br />

by providing a well-documented, replicable framework for other municipalities to follow. The project<br />

delivered four pre-feasibility studies: Energy Efficient Street Lighting, Energy Efficient Lighting in<br />

Municipal Buildings, Implementation of Solar Water Heaters to Middle Class Neighbourhoods, and Micro<br />

Hydro Electricity Potential Study. Each pre-feasibility report came with terms of reference detailing the<br />

next steps for each project.<br />

The consultant also developed an online toolkit on REEE consisting of reviews of REEE technologies,<br />

analysis of the policy and legislative landscape, and links to useful online resources.<br />

A one-day conference on climate change, co-organized by PPIAF and the South African Cities Network,<br />

was held in September 2011 to share lessons learned from the various business plan developments.<br />

Results of the South African Cities Energy Efficient and Renewable Energy Program<br />

Outputs Outcomes<br />

Enabling environment reform<br />

Analyses/assessments prepared<br />

� Four pre-feasibility studies were<br />

developed: Energy Efficient Street<br />

Lighting, Energy Efficient Lighting in<br />

Municipal Buildings, Implementation<br />

of Solar Water Heaters to Middle<br />

Class Neighbourhoods, and Micro<br />

Hydro Electricity Potential Study<br />

Capacity and awareness building<br />

Workshops/seminars<br />

� A workshop was organized for<br />

participating municipalities in<br />

September 2011<br />

� The government of South Africa has approved the<br />

findings of the studies and is seeking funding to conduct<br />

full feasibility studies for the following projects:<br />

– City of Johannesburg’s energy efficient street<br />

lighting<br />

– City of Tshwane’s solar water heating in the<br />

middle-income neighborhoods<br />

– City of Tshwane’s energy efficient lighting in the<br />

municipal buildings<br />

– City of Cape Town’s micro hydro potential<br />

Technical capacity enhanced<br />

� The representatives of the participating municipalities<br />

received training on preparation and implementation of<br />

renewable energy and energy efficiency projects,<br />

September 2001<br />

6


2. Côte d’Ivoire: Strategic Framework for the Development of Transport Infrastructure ($349,000):<br />

this activity was approved on November 2, 2009. At the request of the government of Côte d’Ivoire,<br />

PPIAF is supporting a strategy for the development and maintenance of transport infrastructure, including<br />

mitigation mechanisms against the impact of climate change and options for private sector participation in<br />

future infrastructure investments.<br />

The political crisis in Côte d’Ivoire has significantly derailed the procurement process, which has thus<br />

delayed the launch of the work. The activity was cancelled in August 2011 at the request of the<br />

government of Côte d’Ivoire.<br />

3. Kenya: Due Diligence for the Lake Turkana Wind Project ($294,900): this activity was approved<br />

on November 30, 2011. Following a request from the government of Kenya, the World Bank Group<br />

intends to provide risk guarantees that will enable the realization of the Lake Turkana Wind Power<br />

project, a 300 MW wind power generation facility expected to represent 17% of Kenya’s installed capacity<br />

at completion. This project, expected to be worth over €600 million, is part of Kenya’s Independent Power<br />

Producer program and reflects strong cooperation and synergies between the public and private sectors.<br />

Against this background, PPIAF approved this grant to support the review of project documents and<br />

provision of strategic inputs, as well as support Kenya Power Company in discussions and negotiations of<br />

the Power Purchase Agreement and other relevant project agreements for the Lake Turkana Wind Power<br />

project. Additional support will be provided for an in-depth technical and legal review of the proposed<br />

construction contract and technical solution for the wind resource, the turbine choice, as well as the<br />

building of a transmission line and substations for evacuation of power from the Lake Turkana Wind<br />

Power project.<br />

The expected closing date for this activity is December 31, 2012. PPIAF will monitor results to capture the<br />

actual outcomes and impacts of the activity.<br />

4. Mali: Legal Advisory Services to the Government of Mali for Scatec Solar Project ($49,950):<br />

this activity was approved on November 30, 2011. The government of Mali signed a memorandum of<br />

understanding with Scatec Solar AS (Norway) for the development of the Scatec Solar project as a PPP.<br />

This represents the development, financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of solar<br />

photovoltaic system for a total capacity of 60 MW. The project will be develop by Scatec Solar and<br />

includes a pilot project of 7 MW in Mopti. PPIAF has approved a small-size grant to provide the<br />

government of Mali with the services of a legal advisor who will assist in the review and negotiation of<br />

legal documentation necessary to carry out the PPP project. The Scatec project is the pilot phase for a<br />

further 53 MW clean energy program to be develop in rural areas considered as isolate centers.<br />

The expected closing date for this activity is December 31, 2012. However, there is a high risk that the<br />

activity will be delayed or cancelled due to the political coup that occurred in Mali on March 22, 2012.<br />

III. Looking Ahead<br />

Through the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund, PPIAF has provided technical assistance to<br />

help African countries use PPPs in efforts to address climate change-related issues by improving the<br />

delivery of infrastructure services in Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />

The pilot project ended in August 2011. Building on the satisfactory implementation of ongoing activities<br />

funded through the Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund in Sub-Saharan Africa, PPIAF sought<br />

additional funding to expand the climate change program globally. New funding would support innovative<br />

activities that help establish strong institutional and regulatory frameworks that incorporate adaptation and<br />

mitigation measures to attract private sector climate finance in low-carbon and climate-resilient<br />

infrastructure PPPs.<br />

7


In addition to Norway, the Netherlands have also provided funding to support the PPIAF Public-Private<br />

Partnerships and Climate Change initiative. The closing date of the Trust Fund has been extended to<br />

December 31, 2014. In accordance to PPIAF’s 2011–2013 Work Program, funding will be used to provide<br />

technical assistance to help countries develop appropriate policy strategies, action plans, and regulations<br />

that incorporate adaptation and mitigation measures to attract private sector participation in climatefriendly<br />

infrastructure PPPs (i.e., power, transport, water, sanitation, and solid waste, including urban<br />

infrastructure).<br />

8


Africa<br />

Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

Region Title Major Sector<br />

Africa: Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL) Waste<br />

Management<br />

9<br />

Approval<br />

Amount<br />

Approval<br />

Date<br />

Completion<br />

Date<br />

Status<br />

Energy $170,000 28-Apr-09 31-Mar-11 Completed<br />

Africa Africa: Impact of Climate Change in Transport Transportation $261,500 27-May-09 31-Jan-11 Completed<br />

Africa Africa: Lighting Africa Policy issues Energy $350,000 12-Aug-09 30-Jun-11 Completed<br />

Africa<br />

Africa<br />

South Africa: South African Cities Energy Efficient and<br />

Renewable Energy Program<br />

Côte d’Ivoire: Strategic Framework for the Development<br />

of Transport Infrastructure<br />

Energy $400,000 27-Aug-09 30-Jun-11 Completed<br />

Transportation $349,000 2-Nov-09 30-Jun-11 Cancelled<br />

Africa Africa: Capacity Building Seminar on Geothermal Energy Energy $30,000 30-Dec-10 29-Feb-11 Completed<br />

Africa Africa: African Energy Ministers’ Conference Energy $40,000 23-Aug-11 31-Dec-11 Completed<br />

Africa Kenya: Wind Diligence for Lake Turkana Project Energy $294,900 30-Nov-11 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />

Africa<br />

Mali: Legal Advisory Services to the government of Mali<br />

for the Scatec Solar Project<br />

Energy $49,950 30-Nov-11 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />

Africa Africa: Lighting Africa Expansion Energy $250,000 5-Dec-11 30-Sep-13 Ongoing<br />

Total $2,195,350


Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />

Trust Fund: 71153 - PPIAF Integrating Climate Change Agenda with Public-Private<br />

Partnerships Program – Status as of March 31, 2012<br />

Contribution receipts<br />

Add:<br />

Investment Income<br />

Total Income (A)<br />

Less:<br />

Administration fee 2%<br />

Description<br />

Financial information summary (inception to date)<br />

Disbursements made for the approved, on-going activities<br />

Program Management Unit (PMU) administration expenses<br />

Funds committed and pending to be disbursed to the task teams by PMU for the on-going<br />

activities<br />

Total disbursements (B)<br />

Net fund balance (C) = (A) - (B)<br />

List of approved activities to be created in SAP (D)<br />

Mali: Legal Advisory Support for the Scatec Solar Project<br />

Pipeline (E)<br />

PMU costs - additional funds to be allocated (TF094229)<br />

Fund balance available for new commitments (F) = (C) - (D) - (E)<br />

* PMU Costs:<br />

15% of contribution received to date<br />

End disbursement date 12/31/2014<br />

10<br />

Amount in $<br />

4,028,006<br />

48,997<br />

4,077,003<br />

80,560<br />

1,649,201<br />

604,000<br />

144,900<br />

2,478,661<br />

1,598,342<br />

49,950<br />

201<br />

1,548,191<br />

604,201


Development Impact of Fragility<br />

Report for IFC on Fragile States as of April 2012<br />

1<br />

April 2012<br />

Fragile and conflict-affected states suffer from low economic growth and development, and citizens of<br />

these states lack access to basic services. More than 1.5 billion people live in countries affected by<br />

fragility, violence, and conflict. No low-income fragile state has achieved a single Millennium Development<br />

Goal, and poverty reduction in countries affected by violence is on average nearly a percentage point<br />

lower per year than in countries not affected by violence.<br />

The Infrastructure Challenge in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States<br />

Fragile and conflict-affected states have an urgent need to deliver basic infrastructure services. However,<br />

characterized by the negative impacts of conflict or natural disasters, infrastructure service provision in<br />

these states is often left underfunded, and in many cases, damaged or destroyed. In addition, fragile and<br />

conflict-affected states often have inadequate public revenues and insufficient government capacity to<br />

provide these services.<br />

Opportunities exist to leverage the private sector in the financing and operation of vital infrastructure<br />

assets. Mobilizing private sector financing and expertise can break the cycle of low investment, low<br />

productivity, and resurgent conflict.<br />

Nevertheless, challenges remain in attracting private investors with the risk appetite inherent in working in<br />

fragile and conflict-affected states:<br />

� Higher political and economic risks<br />

� Weak investment climate/enabling environment<br />

� Lack of counterpart agents<br />

� Greater investment needs<br />

� Lower payment capacities on the part of consumers<br />

Laying the Groundwork for Private Sector Participation<br />

Establishing an early track record of attracting private investment and demonstrating good contractual<br />

faith can have a positive demonstration effect on other potential private investors. Creating a solid<br />

enabling environment and investment climate through legal, regulatory, and policy reforms can represent<br />

the first steps on the road to improved infrastructure service provision through private participation.<br />

In post-conflict states, mobile telephony has successfully attracted rapid private sector interest due to the<br />

sector’s short cost re<strong>cover</strong>y period. Investments in other sectors such as power generation and ports<br />

have also taken place relatively soon following the end of conflict. Choosing first projects with the highest<br />

chance of success can create a signaling effect, with the possibility to sequence further activities in other<br />

sectors based on the success of initial projects.<br />

PPIAF-IFC Collaboration in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States<br />

PPIAF and IFC are committed to supporting governments in fragile and conflict-affected states to deliver<br />

basic services to citizens. In June 2010 the IFC provided PPIAF $2 million, 30% of which was targeted<br />

towards IDA-eligible fragile states, with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />

PPIAF has used the funds to attempt to address the development issues that plague fragile and conflictaffected<br />

states by supporting an enabling environment for long-term private sector investments in<br />

infrastructure and by funding activities in telecommunications and other sectors with the highest likelihood<br />

of yielding immediate impact. Examples of PPIAF technical assistance include:


� Preparation of a pre-feasibility or feasibility study for a specific project<br />

� Capacity building support to strengthen knowledge and technical capacity on private sector<br />

participation strategies<br />

� Developing of sector strategies and policies related to private participation in infrastructure<br />

� Quick screening of potential projects with private sector investment<br />

� Payment for legal counsel<br />

Results of PPIAF-IFC Support<br />

PPIAF and IFC teams have worked closely together to screen activities and provide funding to those<br />

activities that have the greatest potential for success in the long term. Thus far, this collaboration has<br />

yielded impressive results:<br />

� C3P has signed six mandates directly following support from PPIAF-IFC funds<br />

� One potential mandate is currently at post-quality at entry stage<br />

� One existing mandate used PPIAF-IFC funds to strengthen the mandate’s implementation and<br />

chance of success<br />

� One existing mandate used PPIAF-IFC funds to provide a post-transaction communications plan<br />

� 77% of country-specific activities took place in fragile countries, representing 80% of funding<br />

� 100% of country-specific activities took place in IDA countries, representing 100% of funding<br />

� 56% of activities were managed by C3P staff, representing 64% of funding<br />

An additional benefit of PPIAF support is that funding can be provided in support of C3P mandates, prior<br />

to the signing of such mandates. This can provide C3P with further leverage when negotiating mandates<br />

with clients.<br />

Support has also been provided for World Bank projects, for example:<br />

� In Chad, the government is launching a bidding process to select a private operator for the water<br />

sector under a three-year service contract<br />

� In Liberia, PPIAF support has catalyzed government commitment to launch a PPP program, and<br />

projects are currently being identified for further pre-feasibility analysis<br />

2


Lesotho: Technical Assistance for PPP Policy<br />

PPIAF funding: $74,910<br />

In 2004 PPIAF supported the preparation of a Country Framework<br />

Report in Lesotho, which included an action plan for facilitating private<br />

participation infrastructure. Since then, the government of Leostho<br />

embarked on a series of PPP projects, the largest being the $100<br />

million Lesotho hospital PPP, structured by IFC, which reached financial<br />

close in March 2009. The government was interested in launching a<br />

more systematic PPP program to <strong>cover</strong> all sectors, and provide greater<br />

autonomy to line ministries to develop PPPs of their own. The<br />

government viewed the development of a PPP policy and guidelines as<br />

a key step to institutionalizing PPPs across government.<br />

PPIAF’s Contribution: PPIAF provided support for an analysis of the legislative and regulatory framework relating to<br />

PPPs in Lesotho and the development of a draft PPP Policy to be used as a basis for promoting PPPs in the country.<br />

The activity fit in parallel with a separate activity to identify and prioritize a PPP pipeline.<br />

Results: The PPP Policy is currently waiting to be approved by Parliament, and a draft PPP Law is also in the<br />

process of being drafted. Following on from the PPIAF activity, IFC C3P has signed three mandates with the<br />

government of Lesotho: 1) ICT and facilities management PPP to connect 165 rural health centers; 2) medical waste;<br />

and 3) wind farm.<br />

PPIAF has provided follow-on support for legal advisory services for the ICT and facilities management PPP, and an<br />

application to support the wind farm through assistance to the Lesotho Electricity Generation Authority is currently<br />

being considered.<br />

The table below lists C3P mandates that have been signed or are at a developed stage of discussion that<br />

have benefitted from PPIAF support using IFC funds. A full list of activities and results can be found in<br />

Annex 1.<br />

PPIAF-Funded Activity Related C3P Mandate Results<br />

Guinea-Bissau: PPP Training Workshop Guinea-Bissau: Support to<br />

Mandate signed<br />

Guinea-Bissau: Preparation of the Strategy Electricidade e Águas de Guinea- 8/4/2011<br />

for Private Sector Participation in the Water<br />

and Electricity Sector<br />

Bissau<br />

Lesotho: PPP Policy Lesotho: Health Centers ICT Mandates signed<br />

Lesotho: Medical Waste<br />

Lesotho: Wind<br />

2/9/2012<br />

Maldives: Solid Waste Management<br />

Maldives: Solid waste Mandate<br />

Communication Program<br />

successfully<br />

closed<br />

Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project— Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Mandate signed<br />

Technical Assistance and Capacity Training<br />

10/14/2010<br />

South Asia: Leveraging PPPs for<br />

Bhutan: Urban Transport Mandate signed<br />

Development—Workshops on Building<br />

Awareness and Strengthening Capacity for<br />

PPPs in South Asia<br />

4/27/2011<br />

Timor-Leste: Implementation of PPP<br />

Timor-Leste: Dili Airport Post Quality at<br />

Program<br />

Entry<br />

West Bank & Gaza: Southern West Bank West Bank & Gaza: West Bank Solid Mandate signed<br />

Solid Waste Management Project<br />

Waste Management<br />

12/19/2011<br />

3


Annex 1<br />

The table below lists the activities approved using IFC funds since July 2010. IFC funds are 100%<br />

committed. We are monitoring ongoing activities to ensure they are implemented as intended and deliver<br />

results.<br />

Title Description of Activity Status of Activity<br />

Afghanistan:<br />

Assessment of<br />

Constraints to<br />

Increased Private<br />

Participation in<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Chad: Support to<br />

Private Sector<br />

Participation in<br />

the Water Sector<br />

Guinea-Bissau:<br />

PPP Training<br />

Workshop<br />

This PPIAF grant is supporting a complete diagnostic<br />

of the PPP enabling environment in Afghanistan. It<br />

will lay the ground work for the future development of<br />

a business plan for the PPP cell to be established in<br />

the Ministry of Finance and the requisite guidelines<br />

and procedures for the cell.<br />

Analyze options for private sector participation in<br />

Chad's water sector.<br />

PPIAF funding is supporting: 1) an analysis of the<br />

sector legal framework; 2) a review Societé<br />

Tchadienne des Eaux (STE)'s current performance;<br />

3) an analysis of the potential participation of the<br />

private sector in the delivery of potable water<br />

services; and 4) an assessment of STE's financial<br />

situation.<br />

The PPP workshop is designed to strengthen the<br />

institutional capacity of Guinée-Bissau’s state-owned<br />

electricity and water utility (EAGB) as well as that of<br />

key stakeholders and government officials<br />

responsible for other sectors with strong PPP<br />

potential.<br />

The workshop will be a learning platform for<br />

government officials and other stakeholders to share<br />

best practices and emerging lessons regarding the<br />

design, implementation, and monitoring of PPPs. The<br />

main beneficiaries of the workshop will be the newlyformed<br />

EAGB PPP Commission, officials from the<br />

Ministry of Energy, and the Ministry of the Economy,<br />

Planning and Regional Integration. It will have the<br />

dual objective of strengthening the capacity of those<br />

officials that will be engaging in preparing and<br />

launching the transaction for a PPP in EAGB, and will<br />

open the discussion to the participation of the private<br />

sector in several other sectors that are of direct<br />

interest for the country.<br />

4<br />

This work is ongoing in close<br />

collaboration with C3P.<br />

Following the PPIAF activity<br />

the government adopted the<br />

PPP strategy including the<br />

recruitment of a private<br />

operator under a 3-year<br />

Service Contract. In June<br />

2011 the World Bank<br />

approved a $27 million<br />

Additional Financing to<br />

support this strategy. The<br />

bidding process for<br />

recruitment of the private<br />

operator is expected to be<br />

launched in April 2012.<br />

The workshop took place in<br />

Bissau from November 7- 11,<br />

2011, attended by around 50<br />

participants. A diverse roster<br />

of speakers contributed to<br />

strengthening the capacity of<br />

government officials working<br />

on the EAGB PPP project as<br />

well as stakeholders in other<br />

sectors.<br />

The training provided an<br />

opportunity for a robust<br />

dialogue on infrastructure<br />

PPPs in general, and the<br />

EAGB PPP project in<br />

particular, which is currently<br />

under preparation, also with<br />

PPIAF support.<br />

Amount<br />

Requested/<br />

Actual<br />

Fragile<br />

$71,250 Yes<br />

$189,730 Yes<br />

49,963 Yes


Guinea-Bissau:<br />

Preparation of<br />

the Strategy for<br />

Private Sector<br />

Participation in<br />

the Water and<br />

Electricity Sector<br />

Guinea: PPP<br />

Training<br />

Workshop<br />

Lesotho: PPP<br />

Policy<br />

Liberia:<br />

Assessment of<br />

PPP Pipeline and<br />

Enabling<br />

Environment<br />

The overall objective of the activity is to successfully<br />

select a private operator for electricity and water<br />

supply/distribution in Bissau. Success will be<br />

measured by a government of Guinea-Bissau<br />

decision to implement the Phase I recommendations<br />

to introduce private sector participation in EAGB. The<br />

PPIAF grant will permit the government to focus on<br />

addressing the technical, legal, institutional, financial<br />

as well as other issues necessary to make an<br />

informed decision as to how to improve the<br />

performance and impact of EAGB through a private<br />

sector participation arrangement. DevCo funds will<br />

also be used during Phase I to defray the IFC costs<br />

associated with this activity. Phase 2 costs will be<br />

largely funded by DevCo. The objective of this phase<br />

is to successfully tender and select a private operator<br />

for EAGB.<br />

The government requested PPIAF funding to support<br />

a three-day PPP training workshop as a learning<br />

platform for approximately 50 key stakeholders to<br />

share best practices and emerging lessons regarding<br />

the design, implementation and monitoring of PPPs,<br />

focused on sectors that are directly relevant to<br />

Guinea.<br />

The government requested PPIAF assistance in<br />

developing a PPP policy for Lesotho. PPIAF funding<br />

would support: 1) an analysis of the legislative and<br />

regulatory environment in Lesotho as relevant to<br />

PPPs; 2) the identification of a PPP pipeline; and 3) a<br />

draft PPP policy and recommendations for next steps.<br />

The objective is to develop a comprehensive, clearly<br />

articulated PPP policy that allows the government to<br />

embark on PPPs in all sectors in a more systematic<br />

manner and provides greater autonomy to line<br />

ministries and other government entities to embark on<br />

PPPs on their own.<br />

The government of Liberia has recently embarked on<br />

a ―national visioning‖ exercise that aims for Liberia to<br />

achieve middle-income status by 2030 through<br />

economic diversification, infrastructure improvement,<br />

and good governance. In particular, the government<br />

of Liberia has recognized the need to leverage private<br />

sector investment in priority sectors of the economy<br />

to accelerate growth. The government of Liberia<br />

requested PPIAF assistance to perform a rapid<br />

scoping of the PPP pipeline and the PPP enabling<br />

environment. This work will facilitate the government<br />

to structure a PPP engagement program that seeks<br />

to address critical policy, institutional, and legal<br />

weaknesses that deter private sector investment and<br />

also put in place proper institutional and project<br />

development services to guide PPP transactions to<br />

market according to best practices.<br />

5<br />

The activity is progressing<br />

well. The call for elections<br />

after the death of the<br />

President slowed progress<br />

slightly, but commitment of<br />

the relevant ministries to the<br />

project remains strong.<br />

The following has already<br />

been achieved:<br />

- completed a 3-day PPP<br />

seminar (see above)<br />

- organized three stakeholder<br />

events (donors' roundtable<br />

and separate workshops for<br />

EAGB and private sector<br />

stakeholders)<br />

- completed the due diligence<br />

of EAGB.<br />

- completed communications<br />

plan<br />

The workshop is due to take<br />

place in Conakry on May 16-<br />

17, 2012 under the auspices<br />

of the Ministry of Finance.<br />

The training will focus on<br />

electricity, telecoms, and<br />

transport (including mining).<br />

PPP Policy is pending<br />

cabinet approval.<br />

Following on from this<br />

activity, C3P has recently<br />

signed three mandates with<br />

the government of Lesotho.<br />

PPIAF has provided<br />

additional funding to retain a<br />

legal consultant for the health<br />

centers ICT project.<br />

Further PPIAF support to the<br />

wind mandate and PPP<br />

legislation is also planned.<br />

This activity identified a<br />

selection of PPP projects with<br />

strong support from the<br />

government. The work was<br />

completed under close<br />

collaboration with C3P.<br />

Additional PPIAF support is<br />

planned to fund pre-feasibility<br />

work on one of the projects<br />

identified in the pipeline<br />

screening.<br />

$439,850 Yes<br />

$57,763 Yes<br />

$71,900<br />

(actual)<br />

$71,557<br />

(actual)<br />

No<br />

Yes


Maldives: Solid<br />

Waste<br />

Management<br />

Communication<br />

Program<br />

Middle East and<br />

North Africa:<br />

Training Course<br />

on PPPs in the<br />

Water Sector<br />

Rwanda: Kigali<br />

Bulk Water<br />

Supply Project—<br />

Technical<br />

Assistance and<br />

Capacity Training<br />

The government of Maldives wants to explore private<br />

sector participation in scientific management of the<br />

waste disposal site on Thilafushi Island and in<br />

developing and implementing an integrated waste<br />

management system, which will include collection,<br />

transfer, processing, and disposal of waste. The<br />

government sought support to assist them in<br />

developing and implementing a communication plan<br />

to ensure that all key stakeholders, opinion makers,<br />

customers (including resorts), and the public as a<br />

whole have access to clear, accurate, and<br />

comprehensive information about the project and are<br />

appropriately consulted on major aspects of the<br />

project. These tasks should contribute to a systematic<br />

effort at change management at the Waste<br />

Management Corporation and with project<br />

stakeholders overall, in order to address the<br />

sensitivities normally associated with a PPP process.<br />

The overall objective of the communication and public<br />

relations program will be to increase awareness,<br />

improve knowledge, understand stakeholder<br />

concerns so that these could be addressed, and<br />

strive for broad-based support for the project.<br />

The workshop is designed to build awareness and<br />

train key government officials from the water<br />

ministries of Iraq, Jordan, and the West Bank & Gaza<br />

on PPP options in the delivery of water services. It is<br />

expected that the training will be attended 15–20<br />

participants. The training workshop will be a learning<br />

platform to provide a basic understanding, build<br />

capacity, and share best practices and emerging<br />

lessons regarding the design, implementation, and<br />

monitoring of PPPs in the water sector.<br />

The objective of this PPIAF activity is to support the<br />

key stakeholders in strengthening their ability to<br />

oversee and implement the PPP transaction currently<br />

being structured by IFC. This will be implemented in<br />

through three main components:<br />

1) Institutional Support Component: to assist the<br />

Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA) in<br />

identifying the most appropriate organizational<br />

structure and developing the capacity of the<br />

organization.<br />

2) Technical Support Component: to assist EWSA<br />

with the first steps to developing a long-term master<br />

plan and to strengthen their monitoring and<br />

management capacity to accommodate growth in<br />

water supplied and increase operational capacity and<br />

efficiency.<br />

3) Training: to provide appropriate targeted training<br />

on PPP for key stakeholders<br />

6<br />

This activity provided posttransaction<br />

related support<br />

for a successful C3P<br />

mandate.<br />

Workshop successfully<br />

completed.<br />

The consultants have been<br />

selected, and work begins in<br />

mid-March 2012 for the<br />

EWSA institutional support<br />

and EWSA technical<br />

monitoring. The technical<br />

assistance and capacity<br />

building is in support of the<br />

Kigali Bulk Water Supply<br />

Project being structured by<br />

C3P.<br />

$50,000 No<br />

$50,000 N/A<br />

$207,700 No


South Asia:<br />

Leveraging PPPs<br />

for Development<br />

– Workshops on<br />

Building<br />

Awareness and<br />

Strengthening<br />

Capacity for<br />

PPPs in South<br />

Asia<br />

South Asia:<br />

Urban Water and<br />

Sanitation<br />

Transformation<br />

South Sudan:<br />

Diagnostic of<br />

Power<br />

Distribution<br />

System<br />

The project is a series of PPP awareness building<br />

workshops to be held in Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka,<br />

and Bangladesh. Developed through a consultative<br />

process between IFC and key government officials in<br />

each of the proposed countries, the PPP workshops<br />

are designed to address the needs of national<br />

governments and policymakers, as well as other key<br />

stakeholders, to better understand the fundamentals<br />

of PPPs and sector-specific issues.<br />

This PPIAF support shall be utilized to encourage<br />

governments to think through PPP options for<br />

strategy infrastructure development and to explore<br />

PPP opportunities to expand IFC’s engagement with<br />

the rest of the region in South Asia. Extending the<br />

seminar series to Indian low-income states is also<br />

being discussed.<br />

The objective of this consultancy is to support the<br />

Bank team in identifying and assessing various PPP<br />

models that could be used in urban water and<br />

sanitation services projects in South Asia to achieve<br />

the goal of delivering sustainable 24/7 water supply<br />

and improved sanitation to current service areas<br />

within a five to six year project period. The<br />

assignment will be split into three phases: 1)<br />

characterize the typical situations to be found in<br />

urban water and sanitation service delivery in South<br />

Asia and hence identify the specific challenges that<br />

are to be faced in developing PPP models to deliver<br />

the above service delivery goal; 2) review national<br />

and international experience in PPPs to identify<br />

possible strengths and weaknesses in meeting the<br />

service delivery goal, and to draw on those reviews<br />

and the consultant’s experience to develop models<br />

that may be appropriate for the South Asia setting;<br />

and 3) carry out a ―market sounding‖ exercise with<br />

potential private sector operators, local urban water<br />

utilities and other government stakeholders to get<br />

their feedback on the PPP options identified in the<br />

second phase.<br />

The Norwegian government has been in discussions<br />

with the government to construct a 30MW hydro plant<br />

at Fula Rapids. Feasibility work has begun, but the<br />

Norwegians have expressed concern about credible<br />

off-take given the current state of the South Sudan<br />

Electricity Corporation (SSEC), the state-owned utility<br />

responsible for power distribution in Juba, Wau, and<br />

Malakal. Based on their experience with IFC in<br />

Liberia, the Norwegians approached IFC to address<br />

the distribution system and structure a management<br />

contract to increase the efficiency of SSEC and<br />

provide a credible off-taker for Fula. In light of this,<br />

IFC engaged in discussions with the government to<br />

provide transaction advice to select an operator to<br />

manage SSEC under a management contract.<br />

It was decided that IFC would first carry out a<br />

diagnostic study, to be funded by PPIAF, to<br />

determine the investment and energy requirements to<br />

upgrade/rehabilitate the power distribution system in<br />

Juba. This diagnostic would then serve as a basis for<br />

the government to search for donor funds to<br />

subsidize the capital and operating costs of such a<br />

project. After this, IFC could then provide transaction<br />

advice to help the government identify and select a<br />

private sector partner to operate SSEC under a<br />

management contract.<br />

7<br />

Following from the<br />

workshops, C3P signed a<br />

mandate to support urban<br />

transport in Bhutan.<br />

$74,300 N/A<br />

Activity is ongoing. 135,000 N/A<br />

The activity was approved<br />

recently, and procurement<br />

has now been completed.<br />

The consultants are expected<br />

to commence on the ground<br />

in late April 2012.<br />

$75,000 Yes


Timor-Leste:<br />

Implementation<br />

of PPP Program<br />

Togo:<br />

Development of<br />

a New<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Sector<br />

Policy and<br />

Strategy<br />

West Bank &<br />

Gaza: Southern<br />

West Bank Solid<br />

Waste<br />

Management<br />

Project<br />

Greater private participation, in particular in<br />

infrastructure, is a strategic priority for IFC in Timor-<br />

Leste and in the Pacific. The government of Timor-<br />

Leste is looking to develop key infrastructure and<br />

believes that PPPs may be one way to do so.<br />

However, it is at a very early stage in terms of its<br />

understanding and capacity. The Asian Development<br />

Bank is helping to develop the policy and regulatory<br />

framework for PPPs. The government of Timor-Leste<br />

has asked IFC to assess 22 potential PPP projects,<br />

which include ports, airports, roads, power<br />

generation, water and sanitation, health,<br />

telecommunications, and other areas. Information is<br />

scarce, and it is not clear how many projects may be<br />

financially viable as PPPs. Nevertheless the<br />

government is keen to find practical ways to move<br />

ahead—it is not interested in conducting drawn-out<br />

studies or producing lengthy reports. The overall<br />

objective is therefore to support the government of<br />

Timor-Leste to launch its PPP program and<br />

implement pilot transactions.<br />

To develop a new policy and strategy for the further<br />

liberalization of the telecommunications sector of<br />

Togo.<br />

PPIAF funding would support: 1) technical advisory<br />

services to the Ministry of Posts and<br />

Telecommunications; 2) implementation support in<br />

follow-up projects; 3) drafting a telecommunications<br />

sector policy statement; and 4) development of<br />

related legal instruments.<br />

Due to political and economic instability in the West<br />

Bank & Gaza, the people of the West Bank & Gaza<br />

have suffered years of inadequate infrastructure<br />

investment and poor provision of public services. In<br />

particular, the provision of solid waste management<br />

(―SWM‖) services represents a concern, as<br />

unsanitary waste disposal practices present a serious<br />

public health threat and environmental hazard.<br />

IFC C3P has been solicited to ensure efficient and<br />

appropriate operations and maintenance of a donorfunded<br />

landfill, and will support the Joint Services<br />

Council for Hebron & Bethlehem in attracting private<br />

sector participation for the operation and<br />

maintenance of a SWM project for the Southern West<br />

Bank. PPIAF support is funding the services of a legal<br />

consultant.<br />

8<br />

PPIAF will provide follow-up<br />

support for transaction<br />

advisory costs if C3P is able<br />

to secure a mandate for Dili<br />

Airport, one of the projects<br />

prioritized during the pipeline<br />

screening.<br />

A first report, the draft of the<br />

sector assessment market<br />

analysis, has been prepared<br />

and submitted to the<br />

government for comments.<br />

This activity is supporting the<br />

C3P solid waste mandate in<br />

the West Bank. Procurement<br />

of consultants completed,<br />

and work is now underway.<br />

$74,750 Yes<br />

$130,000 Yes<br />

$199,975 Yes<br />

Total 1,970,561

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!