PMR cover.psd - ppiaf
PMR cover.psd - ppiaf
PMR cover.psd - ppiaf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Program Manager’s Report — Table of Contents<br />
1. Letter from the Program Manager to PPIAF’s Donors, May 11, 2012<br />
2. FY2012 Portfolio Report: July 1, 2011 – March 31, 2012<br />
PPIAF and SNTA Total Funding in Q1-Q3 FY2012 vs. Q1-Q3 FY2011—Regional and<br />
Sectoral Split<br />
Status of PPIAF Approved Activities Inception to Date—July 1999 to March 2012<br />
3. PPIAF Work Program 2011–2013<br />
Activities Approved in Q1-Q3 of FY2012, Classified in Accordance with PPIAF Work<br />
Program 2011–2013<br />
4. Regional Updates of PPIAF’s Activities Around the World<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
East Asia and the Pacific<br />
Eastern Europe and Central Asia<br />
Latin America and the Caribbean<br />
Middle East and North Africa<br />
South Asia<br />
5. Impact Stories<br />
PPIAF Supports Small-Scale Water Providers in Uganda<br />
PPIAF Helps Peruvian Sub-Nationals Tap Financial Markets: the Case of the<br />
Municipality of Lima<br />
SNTA Supports a Water Utility in Brazil’s Frontier Region<br />
PPIAF Supports Private Sector Participation in the Solid Waste Sector in Ethiopia<br />
PPIAF Support to the Enabling Environment for Public-Private Partnerships in<br />
Malawi<br />
6. Non-Core Trust Fund Status Reports<br />
PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund for Middle-Income Countries<br />
PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response to the Global Financial Crisis<br />
PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund on Integrating Climate Change Agenda with Public-<br />
Private Partnerships<br />
Report for IFC on Fragile States
Dear friends,<br />
1<br />
May 11, 2012<br />
I am pleased to present to you the FY2012 Program Manager’s Report. As you will notice from this report,<br />
this has been another active year for PPIAF, in which we continued delivering important technical<br />
assistance to governments. We are constantly innovating to deliver better, faster, and efficient technical<br />
assistance, adapted to the stage of development and needs of each country. Herein please find a<br />
summary of the various areas in which we have been working this year:<br />
Technical assistance to client governments<br />
During the first three quarters of FY2012, PPIAF has provided funding of close to $9.5 million for 71<br />
activities under the PPIAF and Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) programs across all regions.<br />
This is a significant increase on the same period in FY2011 when approved activities totaled $4.2 million.<br />
In Sub-Saharan Africa, the second quarter was a highlight and saw strong demand with 17 PPIAF<br />
activities approved for a value of over $2.4 million, the largest quarterly commitment to Sub-Saharan<br />
Africa since the second quarter of fiscal 2010.<br />
In the Middle East and North Africa, PPIAF is supporting the first public-private partnership (PPP)<br />
transaction in the West Bank and Gaza by providing funding for legal advisory transaction support for the<br />
Southern West Bank Solid Waste Management Project, to be structured by the IFC. In the same region<br />
the first SNTA activity was approved, with the Ministry of Interior and Municipalities in Lebanon embarking<br />
on an ambitious decentralization policy. The activity will provide creditworthiness support to the Al Fayhaa<br />
Union of Municipalities and the Municipalities of Tripoli, Mina, and Beddawi.<br />
PPIAF has also been active in other regions such as Eastern Europe and Central Asia where it is<br />
helping the government of Albania prepare a privatization strategy for several hydropower plants.<br />
In South Asia, PPIAF is supporting PPP pipeline preparation and initial implementation with funds to the<br />
government of Nepal to support the screening and initial feasibility assessment of a pipeline of potential<br />
PPP projects, and also in the Maldives providing post-award contract management support for a<br />
pioneering PPP transaction in the solid waste management sector.<br />
In Latin America and the Caribbean, PPIAF is supporting the preparation of a performance-based<br />
efficiency improvement contract for the National Water and Sewerage Agency (IDAAN)’s Colon Business<br />
Unit.<br />
Lastly, in East Asia and the Pacific, PPIAF is supporting an activity in Lao PDR that will assess the<br />
suitability of transport projects to be structured as PPPs. In this period the SNTA program in East Asia<br />
and the Pacific also concluded its first activity in Indonesia for the assessment of the creditworthiness of<br />
four major regional cities.<br />
The technical assistance granted in FY2012 fits within the approved work program. We include herein the<br />
FY2012 portfolio reports (core and non-core trust funds) and a list of activities approved in FY2012<br />
organized as per PPIAF’s work program.<br />
In Q1-Q3 FY2012, we approved the following total grant amounts per DAC status:
LICs<br />
MICs<br />
PPIAF SNTA<br />
DAC 1 $3,398,631 50%<br />
$297,995 24%<br />
59%<br />
DAC 2 $622,900 9% $46,750 4%<br />
DAC 3 $1,576,513 23%<br />
$561,300 45%<br />
41%<br />
DAC 4 $1,172,665 18% $329,780 27%<br />
Total $6,770,709 100% $1,235,825 100%<br />
These numbers do not include global activities or those approved from the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
for Middle-Income Countries.<br />
In FY2012 we have been proactively and systematically developing activities for PPIAF and SNTA<br />
support. We are doing this in many ways, including the following:<br />
a) Attending one-on-one meetings with government officials in many developing countries around<br />
the world. A small group of 8 members has had meetings with government officials in 16<br />
countries in the regions listed below, engaging in a systematic effort country by country to<br />
develop a solid pipeline of technical assistance based on current expressed needs of the<br />
governments. This meets the PMU’s and Donors objectives of developing capacity and<br />
providing support in DAC I and DAC II countries:<br />
a. Sub-Saharan Africa: Burkina Faso (DAC 1), Chad (DAC 1), The Gambia (DAC 1),<br />
Guinea-Bissau (DAC 1), Kenya (DAC 2), Lesotho (DAC 1), Mozambique (DAC 1), Niger<br />
(DAC 1), Senegal (DAC 1), South Africa (DAC 4), Tanzania (DAC 1), and Uganda (DAC<br />
1)<br />
b. Middle East and North Africa: Egypt, Jordan<br />
c. East Asia and the Pacific: Indonesia, and the Philippines<br />
b) Engaging daily with our colleagues from the World Bank (WB), IFC, and several of your<br />
representatives in various countries (including MCC in Washington, DC and Lesotho; DFID in<br />
Mozambique and South Africa; SECO in South Africa; USAID in Washington, DC; AusAID in<br />
Australia; etc.) to develop activities to provide technical assistance and to disseminate the type of<br />
support we can provide. One example is assistance (approved) to the government of Lesotho to<br />
develop a PPP to provide ICT interconnectivity for more than 150 health clinics, which are being<br />
refurbished and built by MCC; this activity is being developed in collaboration with IFC.<br />
c) Expanding the Help Desk for the benefit of the Ghana PPP Unit (agreement signed in December<br />
1, 2011).<br />
d) Developing dedicated calls for proposals, based on our assessment of the needs in various<br />
countries and the importance to provide a rapid response. The table below summarizes the<br />
various calls for proposals launched to date and the number of proposals received as of March<br />
31, 2012. We continue to receive and evaluate proposals on an ongoing basis.<br />
Title/objective Launch Date(s)<br />
Project Pipeline Screening and Initial<br />
Feasibility Assessment of Potential<br />
Infrastructure PPPs<br />
Support to Infrastructure PPPs in<br />
Fragile and Conflict-Affected States<br />
October 14, 2011 11<br />
February 8, 2012 4<br />
2<br />
28%<br />
72%<br />
Number of<br />
proposals received
Title/objective Launch Date(s)<br />
Project Pipeline Screening and Initial<br />
Feasibility Assessment of Potential<br />
Infrastructure PPPs in Small Island<br />
Developing States<br />
Water and Sanitation in Sub-Saharan<br />
Africa<br />
Climate Change Adaptation and<br />
Mitigation Project Initiative<br />
Fast Track SNTA Proposals for Low-<br />
Income Countries<br />
Joint PPIAF-GPOBA-ESMAP Call for<br />
Proposals for Rural Electrification in<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
February 10, 2012 1<br />
October 6, 2011 24<br />
February 8, 2012 7<br />
May 24, 2011 and February 8, 2012 30<br />
April 4, 2011 and September 13, 2011 4<br />
3<br />
Number of<br />
proposals received<br />
e) Providing Rapid Response expert consultancy services to governments in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
who have various projects and wish to receive feedback on their plans to develop and implement<br />
various PPP projects, identifying the feasibility of their projects, their readiness, and the steps<br />
required to structure those projects. This Rapid Response is being delivered by the consulting<br />
firm Castalia Advisors and consists of short in-country missions by PPP experts, to come up with<br />
a priority list and the steps needed to develop those projects further.<br />
In FY2012 Castalia performed the following rapid-response missions:<br />
Country Objective Date Results<br />
Ghana<br />
Zimbabwe<br />
Assess current situation and work<br />
with government counterparts and<br />
Bank team to identify options for<br />
the optimum arrangements for the<br />
provision of urban water services<br />
Provide guidance to the<br />
government on the development<br />
and implementation of its PPP<br />
program, <strong>cover</strong>ing the transport,<br />
electricity, telecommunications<br />
and water sectors<br />
Monitoring and evaluation<br />
October<br />
2011<br />
January<br />
2012<br />
� Final report: Institutional Options for<br />
Improving Water Supply in Ghana<br />
� Broad options presented to Minister<br />
of Water Resources, Works, and<br />
Housing on October 21, 2011<br />
� Final report delivered to government,<br />
and task team in discussion with<br />
government on next steps<br />
� PPIAF to support one of the identified<br />
PPP projects once there is an<br />
agreement to move forward<br />
In FY2012 we have continued the work begun in FY2011 to capture the results of PPIAF’s work in our<br />
internal database, based on PPIAF’s new refined system of methodically measuring results. In particular,<br />
we continue to prepare country write-ups summarizing PPIAF assistance in each country where PPIAF<br />
has provided support. From a total of 24 countries researched as of the June 2011 Casablanca Program<br />
Council Meeting (PCM), we have now completed 61 countries researched as of May 4, 2012. These<br />
country write-ups are all available on the PPIAF website. The 2012 Monitoring and Evaluation Report
contains a comprehensive list of outputs, outcomes, and impacts captured in our database as of this date.<br />
This consists of very detailed research to extract the results of PPIAF-funded work over the past 13 years.<br />
When possible, we have been validating these results during our meetings with government officials of<br />
the various countries visited this year, as well as with the corresponding WB and IFC Task Team Leaders<br />
(TTLs).<br />
As requested during the June 2011 Casablanca PCM, we have prepared a logframe for PPIAF and<br />
SNTA. On November 22, 2011 we sent it to all donors for comments. Again, we revised it in May 2012<br />
and are including it as part of the documentation for the Kampala PCM. As of this date we have not<br />
received any comments. The proposed logframe is being submitted for PCM approval.<br />
We also commissioned an external independent review of PPIAF’s monitoring and evaluation indicators<br />
and system by Castalia Advisors. The results of the review will be presented in Kampala.<br />
Communication and dissemination<br />
PPIAF is now 13 years old. Although it works upstream, many activities supported by the program since<br />
1999 have produced visible results on the ground. To highlight the visible, lasting impacts PPIAF has<br />
achieved, we continue to prepare and disseminate our series of Impact Stories that give examples of<br />
results of PPIAF’s interventions in a particular country, country write-ups that summarize the technical<br />
assistance PPIAF has given and the corresponding results by country, and Regional Updates that<br />
provide a wider view of the work PPIAF and its SNTA program have been supporting in a particular<br />
region. This report contains a few Impact Stories and the FY2012 Regional Updates.<br />
In FY2012, we have been more strategic regarding communicating about the PPIAF program and its<br />
results, as well as disseminating best practices. Our main targets to receive relevant information have<br />
been: 1) our client governments, main beneficiaries of PPIAF assistance; 2) your institutions, so that they<br />
know what the program is doing; 3) internal WB and IFC staff, to know how best to access our funds and<br />
work with PPIAF; and 4) the general public. We have a contact list of over 1,000 people who receive<br />
valuable information and updates from PPIAF once or twice a month. To accomplish this, we have<br />
restructured the PPIAF website and focused on increased communication with our donors and partners.<br />
PPIAF website. In October 2011 PPIAF launched a better organized and more substantive website. We<br />
spent several months re-designing it and preparing new content to make it more relevant. It now contains<br />
more detailed information on PPIAF’s work in a particular infrastructure sector or theme (e.g., fragile<br />
states), and aims to become a one-stop resource on PPP- or infrastructure-related information. Our main<br />
objectives are to convey more clearly what PPIAF is and what it has been doing since its founding in<br />
1999, as well as to disseminate in an organized manner the knowledge that has been supported by your<br />
institutions for many years to make it accessible to client governments and the wider public.<br />
In particular, the new website now includes:<br />
� A section on PPIAF’s work in its strategic themes (universal access, climate change,<br />
urbanization, SNTA, fragile states, regional integration, and capacity building), which includes<br />
related links, PPIAF publications, lessons learned, pages on specific topics when relevant, and<br />
final PPIAF-funded reports when available. Specific topic pages include information on PPIAF<br />
support to: gender, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, sub-national credit<br />
ratings, sub-national performance improvement, and PPP units.<br />
� A section on PPIAF’s work in its priority sectors (power, water and sanitation, transportation,<br />
telecommunications, and irrigation), which includes pages with detailed information of PPIAF<br />
support in its sub-sectors and final PPIAF-funded reports when available. Specific topic pages<br />
include information on PPIAF support to: electricity generation, transmission, and distribution;<br />
rural electrification; renewable energy and energy efficiency; non-revenue water; solid waste<br />
4
management; small-scale water providers; wastewater and sewerage; airports; ports; railways;<br />
bus rapid transit; light rail; and highways.<br />
� PPIAF’s Knowledge Center, a valuable source of up-to-date information on infrastructure and<br />
PPPs, with materials and resources that explore current trends and encourage discussion, written<br />
by experts in the field. In particular, PPIAF's Library includes PPIAF publications, PPIAF-funded<br />
reports, books, short notes, case studies, and other resources.<br />
� A section on the results PPIAF has achieved over the past 13 years, which includes all of the<br />
country write-ups drafted to date, as well as PPIAF’s Impact Stories series that highlights<br />
examples of successful PPIAF and SNTA activities.<br />
In the first three quarters of FY2011, PPIAF’s website received 6,937 visits and 22,403 total page views.<br />
In Q1-Q3 FY2012, www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org received 10,205 visits and 28,889 total page views. This is an increase<br />
of 47%.<br />
PPIAF is also regularly communicating its results and online resources to donors and their teams in the<br />
field, as well as to people from developing countries met in the last two years by PPIAF team members.<br />
From August 2011 to March 31, 2012, PPIAF sent 11 emails in this respect.<br />
Date Email Subject<br />
September 9, 2011<br />
PPIAF Publications and Resources on Non-Revenue Water and the Water and<br />
Sanitation Sector<br />
October 20, 2011 Launching of PPIAF's New and Improved Website<br />
November 1, 2011 PPIAF Reports and Resources on Solid Waste Management<br />
November 9, 2011<br />
PPIAF, 11 Years of Upstream Work Producing Visible Results on the Ground—<br />
Feature Story<br />
December 1, 2011 PPIAF Reports and Resources on Irrigation<br />
December 10, 2011 PPIAF Support in the Transport Sector<br />
January 31, 2012 PPIAF Support in the Telecommunications Sector<br />
March 1, 2012 PPIAF Support to PPP Units, Small-Scale Water Providers, and IFC's Handshake<br />
March 9, 2012 Recent PPIAF-funded and Sponsored Publications<br />
March 16, 2102<br />
PPIAF Support to Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency; Climate Change<br />
Mitigation and Adaptation; Infrastructure Regulation; Lessons Learned on Pricing<br />
and Affordability; and Updates from the PPPIRC Website<br />
March 30, 2012 Recent PPIAF Publications and Updates from PPIAF-funded Activities<br />
We have received many positive comments:<br />
Date Sender Comments<br />
September<br />
9, 2011<br />
October 20,<br />
2011<br />
November<br />
1, 2011<br />
Momodou Lamin Sompo<br />
Ceesay, Senior Electricity<br />
Engineer, Public Utilities<br />
Regulatory Authority, The<br />
Gambia<br />
Gulla Jan, Graduate Student,<br />
KDI School, South Korea<br />
Andrew N. Bvumbe, Head Debt<br />
Management Office, Ministry of<br />
Finance, Zimbabwe<br />
Many thanks for the links to the documents and it’s nice to hear<br />
from you. I've already downloaded a few and would continue to<br />
read others. The PPP Reference looks good and should become<br />
very handy.<br />
Thank you so much for sharing such kind of information with me. It<br />
is really useful and hope it will work to apply in Afghanistan.<br />
Thank you very much for the information. This is going to be useful<br />
for the MOF as we are in the process of setting up a PPP Unit.<br />
5
Date Sender Comments<br />
November<br />
9, 2011<br />
December<br />
1, 2011<br />
December<br />
19, 2011<br />
January 31,<br />
2012<br />
March 1,<br />
2012<br />
Lourenço Veniça, Economist,<br />
Road Fund, Mozambique<br />
Demba Jallow, Corporate<br />
Planning Manager, National<br />
Water and Electricity Company<br />
LTD, The Gambia<br />
Ms Tchimsi Atchabao, Advisor,<br />
Research & Development, Togo<br />
Free Zone Authority (SAZOF),<br />
Togo<br />
Zewdineh B. Haile, Consultant<br />
and Attorney at Law, Zee Law<br />
Office, Ethiopia<br />
Marc Frilet, Chief Editor, Head<br />
of PPP Working Group, French<br />
Institute of International Legal<br />
Experts and Paris Bar<br />
Thank you for networking us in this subject. We will keep following<br />
up all the international discussions and practices regarding this<br />
specific subject.<br />
Thanks you for this valuable information. We will review and try to<br />
find a way reaching out for support.<br />
I just run through the precious files you willingly shared with us. I<br />
would like to extend special Thanks to you and the Team for your<br />
care.<br />
This is just to say thanks a million. Your successive emails have<br />
truly bridged-up the communication gap. We met last in Addis over<br />
lunch with your colleague a couple of months ago. The Kigali<br />
workshop was a great success and your presentation was the best.<br />
The documents you have shared with us are another testimonial<br />
for the quality service your institution has been providing to the<br />
public at large.<br />
As you may know, the international industry and in particular the<br />
Confederation of International Contractor Association (CICA) and<br />
its PPP working group representing the industry together with the<br />
French Institute of International Experts (IFEJI) and the Paris Bar<br />
have been working closely with the World Bank, various PPP Units,<br />
and other international financial associations in order to contribute<br />
to the success of PPPs around the world.<br />
In this respect, we have not only advertised your publications but<br />
also use them a lot as a basis for contributing to develop the<br />
conditions of success of PPP mostly in developing countries where<br />
such conditions remain often to be designed in several areas.<br />
Continuing proactive exchanges on the conditions of success of<br />
PPPs with a good equilibrium between the expectations of the<br />
public sector, the consumers and the industry, is more important<br />
than ever. Indeed with the financial crisis it is essential to<br />
understand how to attract investors for long term and resilient PPP.<br />
We are convinced that with our joint efforts the preparation and<br />
planning of a pipeline of good PPPs which is so far difficult to<br />
achieve in many countries may become a realistic goal.<br />
Disseminating PPP best practices. We continue to disseminate the various global knowledge products<br />
developed by PPIAF with PPP units in developing countries, universities, Academia, and other interested<br />
people. The team has attended several conferences, seminars, and other events in Africa and Asia to<br />
further disseminate our knowledge products and share our experience on PPPs. We have also<br />
participated as speakers at conferences sponsored by PPIAF and at others organized by third parties or<br />
other partners. We are also expanding our communication efforts to a wider audience within the World<br />
Bank Group.<br />
In FY2012, the PPP in Infrastructure Resource Center (PPPIRC) team was asked to review PPIAF’s<br />
recently developed online database of PPIAF-funded activities. The review’s primary objective was to<br />
determine whether any legal precedents or materials relating to the establishment of PPPs funded by<br />
PPIAF could be further disseminated through the PPPIRC. The PPPIRC team did a full review of PPIAF’s<br />
database to find high-quality material. Legally relevant documents (including sample agreements and<br />
draft legislation) from 25 activities were selected for dissemination, as they were considered to be good<br />
precedents, which would complement existing documents published on the PPPIRC website.<br />
6
Communicating with donors. We have prepared short donor-partnership documents summarizing the<br />
history of each partnership, common areas for priority support, and some results to date, so that you can<br />
disseminate to other staff within your institution, in your home country, or abroad, so that other colleagues<br />
know more about the program that you have been funding and we can collaborate better. We have<br />
shared all of these documents with you, and final versions can be found on the PPIAF website in the<br />
About Us section.<br />
At least monthly, we have been sharing with you and with your teams in country offices for whom you<br />
sent us email addresses, the new material we are writing and publishing. In a visit to one of your offices in<br />
South Africa, we were very pleased to see that the material we have distributed on sub-national finance in<br />
Africa was on the meeting table!<br />
Annual report. On September 30, 2011 we released to you and to the public PPIAF’s FY2011 annual<br />
report; the report was finalized within the time period required in the Program Charter. It provides a good<br />
picture of our program in FY2011. We look forward to your comments.<br />
Preparation of selected articles for publication. We continue drafting Feature Stories that highlight<br />
and comment on current happenings relevant to PPIAF, including selected events, activities, and articles<br />
that are published on PPIAF’s website. We are also regular contributors to IFC’s quarterly Handshake<br />
Magazine, with published articles on Cities and PPPs, Meeting the Challenges of Water Scarcity and<br />
Distribution through PPPs, Climate Change and PPPs, and Healthcare and PPPs.<br />
Knowledge and learning for client governments<br />
Capacity building seminars. At the request of various governments in Africa and in other countries, we<br />
have prepared and participated as speakers at various PPP seminars with the objective of developing<br />
capacity in government officials, explaining what PPPs are and how they can be structured, emphasizing<br />
the importance of developing a clear enabling environment to provide confidence to investors, and<br />
providing examples of how PPIAF assistance has led to specific PPP projects.<br />
Country Date<br />
Partners/<br />
organizers<br />
7<br />
Topic<br />
Guinea-Bissau November 8–10, 2011 IFC, WBI, WB PPP training in Bissau 35<br />
Mozambique November 1–10, 2011 WB, DFID<br />
Kenya December 1–2, 2011<br />
Jordan April 2–4, 2012<br />
Switzerland February 21–23, 2012<br />
Senegal<br />
June 5–8, 2012 (to<br />
come)<br />
AfDB, AME<br />
Trade<br />
WB, Carbon<br />
Finance-Assist<br />
Program,<br />
Government of<br />
Jordan<br />
WBI, ADB,<br />
UNECE, IFC,<br />
Swiss<br />
Government<br />
SECO, Global<br />
Energy Basel<br />
Foundation<br />
IFC, WSP,<br />
AfDB<br />
PPP training for mega<br />
projects<br />
Number of<br />
participants<br />
30<br />
Africa PPP conference 200<br />
Regional Workshop on<br />
Selecting and Implementing<br />
Nationally Appropriate<br />
Mitigation Measures<br />
(NAMAs)<br />
PPPs and OBA: improving<br />
accountability in service<br />
provision<br />
Energy Basel Summit 2012 60<br />
50 from<br />
Middle East<br />
and North<br />
Africa region<br />
500 from 90<br />
countries<br />
PPPs in Water 100 (target)
We have also sponsored several other capacity building events, as follows:<br />
Country Date Partners Topic<br />
Nigeria<br />
November 14–16,<br />
2011<br />
South Africa March 26, 2012 AFD<br />
Singapore January 15–21, 2012<br />
IFC, WBI, WB<br />
ESMAP, ADB,<br />
WBI, AFD,<br />
SSATP<br />
8<br />
PPP Workshop on Best<br />
Practices and Lessons<br />
Learned from Recent<br />
African Case Studies<br />
Municipal Revenue<br />
Management Master Class<br />
Capacity Building Training<br />
Leaders in Urban Transport<br />
Planning<br />
Number of<br />
participants<br />
300<br />
40 from 13<br />
countries in<br />
Africa<br />
66<br />
participants<br />
from 33<br />
countries<br />
In these events, we disseminated close to 4,000 copies of PPIAF materials, including PPIAF publications<br />
and Impact Stories, to around 1,400 people.<br />
Preparing lessons learned and other knowledge materials. We continue preparing materials to share<br />
lessons learned on PPPs, disseminating case studies funded by PPIAF and publishing them on the<br />
website, and preparing short notes on various topics, including a series of notes on PPPs in fragile states,<br />
sub-national financing, and pricing and affordability in essential infrastructure services.<br />
Partnerships. We are constantly looking for new partners to deliver much-needed training on PPPs to<br />
government officials, mainly from Africa. We have spoken with the Development Bank of South Africa and<br />
the PPP Unit of South Africa, within the National Treasury, to partner for the delivery of training to<br />
governments who so desire this, as they have an established training program. We also partnered with<br />
the Agence Française de Développement to deliver training on sub-national financing in Durban in March<br />
2012.<br />
Strengthening collaboration<br />
We continue developing new partnerships and strengthening existing ones with key players such as the<br />
Global Partnership for Output-Based Aid (GPOBA), the Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), the Energy<br />
Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), IFC InfraVentures, IFC’s Conflict-Affected States in<br />
Africa (CASA) initiative, and other teams from the World Bank and IFC, to innovate on new and more<br />
effective ways of providing technical assistance. These relationships will help us to be more strategic and<br />
focused, as well as ensure that our interventions are sequenced and achieve results. Some of the<br />
partnerships we continue developing include:<br />
Cities Alliance: Joint donor meeting in Kampala in June 2012; co-sponsoring the Policy Advisory Forum<br />
under the topic ―Financing of African Cities,‖ held in Maputo on November 7, 2011; and participating in<br />
Cities Alliance Program Council Meeting held on November 8–9, 2011.<br />
A partnership with Cities Alliance has as objective to maximize the synergies between the two programs<br />
and will enable us to leverage more resources to support the urban development of African Cities. Cities<br />
Alliance is supporting Urban Planning to meet future needs of populations; PPIAF can support the<br />
development and implementation of specific infrastructure projects, which are identified in this planning<br />
process, as follows: structuring PPPs and supporting improvements in the financial capacity of public<br />
utilities, whether providing water, electricity, urban transport, waste collection, etc. With our various
instruments and concerted efforts, both Cities Alliance and PPIAF can contribute to improve the access of<br />
populations from African Cities to basic infrastructure services.<br />
IFC: PPIAF team members were invited to participate in three IFC in-country trainings (Kenya, Egypt, and<br />
Turkey) to strengthen the relationship between our teams; one of our staff members is working out of<br />
IFC’s office in Dubai, thus collaborating very closely; developing and delivering joint in-country trainings;<br />
doing joint IFC-PPIAF missions to various countries, including Niger, Chad, Burkina Faso, and Lesotho;<br />
developing a sub-national program for Turkey in support of commercial borrowing by second-tier<br />
municipalities.<br />
Financial solutions group of WB: As the financial solutions group works to structure political risk<br />
guarantees in support of various complex PPPs, PPIAF has been providing some specific transaction<br />
support. This includes, among others, support to develop the Lake Turkana Wind Energy project, the<br />
Geothermal Development Corporation of Kenya set up to develop geothermal energy, and support for<br />
private development in the Nigerian power sector.<br />
IFC InfraVentures: PPIAF is providing support to some of their project-related work. For example, PPIAF<br />
is currently assisting the government of Mali in reviewing and negotiating the legal documentation for the<br />
Scatec solar PPP project.<br />
Most of the activities PPIAF supports are in conjunction with its numerous partners. In particular, some<br />
examples of activities PPIAF has provided funding for in FY2012 that were co-financed by other<br />
complementary organizations are:<br />
� Mozambique: preparation of a gas sector master plan, with Norad<br />
� South Africa: regional capacity building workshop on sub-national financing, with the Agence<br />
Française de Développement<br />
� Senegal: regional conference on PPPs in water and sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa, with<br />
Infrastructure Consortium for Africa<br />
Funding<br />
In FY2012 we have prepared, negotiated, and finalized many Trust Fund Agreements through which your<br />
institutions and governments have pledged new funding for the PPIAF and SNTA programs. This work<br />
implied the detailed preparation of proposals, their discussion either by telephone, VC, or in meetings,<br />
and obtaining the corresponding approvals. We thank you for your continuous support.<br />
Reporting on FY2010 Strategy for Resource Allocation<br />
During the June 2010 Nairobi PCM, we presented the PPIAF and SNTA 2010 Strategy for Resource<br />
Allocation, which responded to the request made at the March 2009 Rome PCM—following the<br />
recommendations of CEPA—to articulate more clearly the guiding principles behind PPIAF’s operations.<br />
The Strategy for Resource Allocation proposed to continue using the filters that have guided activity<br />
selection in the past, which are consistent with the Program Council’s stated priorities, but added some<br />
elements to improve the focus of our operations.<br />
After two years of implementation, we are pleased to continue seeing the results of this Strategy for<br />
Resource Allocation. Requests for PPIAF funding are still much more focused; the Project Cycle Planning<br />
Worksheet that we incorporated into our applications is helping us ensure that at the time of activity<br />
inception, we understand what the expected results are, and how the activity will contribute directly or<br />
indirectly to increased private sector investment in infrastructure.<br />
Since November 2010 we have been reviewing all concepts and application requests for PPIAF funding<br />
in weekly Team Review Meetings. This has proven to be an effective mechanism to collectively screen,<br />
9
early on, preliminary requests for funds, and to discuss in detail complete applications, complementing<br />
them when needed with the team’s experience and valuable inputs. Included in this report you will find the<br />
FY2012 Portfolio Report containing a table with brief descriptions of the activities approved and<br />
committed in FY2012, as well as a summary of the PPIAF portfolio since inception (FY1999–2012). Our<br />
review process is also enabling us to monitor more closely our pipeline of proposals and activities to<br />
ensure they make progress and proceed without problems, and to ensure the availability of funds.<br />
We are also sequencing activities to ensure the beneficiary government accepts the results of the<br />
technical assistance provided before proceeding to the next phase: upon the completion of an activity, if<br />
the beneficiary government decides to move further, we analyze requests for follow-up technical<br />
assistance until a private sector project materializes. This has proven to be an effective process to ensure<br />
ownership of the results from the beneficiaries.<br />
We look forward to your continued support to our program.<br />
Best regards,<br />
Adriana de Aguinaga<br />
Program Manager<br />
Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF)<br />
10
FY2012 Portfolio Report: July 1, 2011 – March 31, 2012<br />
April 1, 2012<br />
Dear Program Council Members:<br />
During the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, PPIAF provided funding of over $9.5 million for 71 activities<br />
under the PPIAF and Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) programs. Some activity highlights are<br />
described below.<br />
In Sub-Saharan Africa, PPIAF approved 32 activities, with a value of over $3.9 million, representing 41%<br />
of region-specific PPIAF and SNTA funding. In Rwanda, PPIAF is providing support to the Energy, Water,<br />
and Sanitation Authority (EWSA), the off-taker for a bulk water public-private partnership (PPP) project,<br />
which is the first major PPP for urban water supply in Kigali. This activity will strengthen EWSA’s ability to<br />
oversee and implement the PPP transaction currently being structured by the International Finance<br />
Corporation (IFC). In Mali, PPIAF is providing transaction support to the government to review and<br />
negotiate the Scatec solar and Kenie hydropower projects, which are being developed by IFC<br />
InfraVentures.<br />
In the Middle East and North Africa, PPIAF is supporting the first PPP transaction in the West Bank and<br />
Gaza by providing funding for legal advisory support for the Southern West Bank Solid Waste<br />
Management Project. The Al-Minya Landfill will provide improved solid waste management services to<br />
approximately 780,000 inhabitants. It is expected to open in early 2013 and will process approximately<br />
34% of the solid waste in the West Bank.<br />
In Latin America and the Caribbean, PPIAF is supporting an innovative activity in Colombia that will<br />
help the government structure and implement a financing window to harness private sector support in<br />
developing approximately 7,000 hectares of land identified under the Macroproyectos housing program.<br />
In Brazil PPIAF is also helping to develop a sustainable forestry concession model in the Amazon.<br />
In Eastern Europe and Central Asia, PPIAF is helping the government of Albania prepare a privatization<br />
strategy for several hydropower plants, including Bistrica 1 (25 MW) and Bistrica 2 (5 MW) on the River<br />
Bistrica, and Ulza (25.2 MW) and Shkopeti (25 MW) on the River Mati, and is providing support to the<br />
Armenia Water and Sewerage Company for the design of a new enhanced management contract for<br />
2011–2013.<br />
In South Asia, PPIAF has provided funds to the governments of Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka to<br />
undertake the screening and initial feasibility assessment of a pipeline of potential PPP projects. In the<br />
Maldives PPIAF is providing post-award contract management support for a pioneering PPP transaction<br />
in the solid waste management sector.<br />
In East Asia and the Pacific, SNTA is helping the City of Tanuan improve its capacity for fiscal and<br />
financial management. Tanuan is currently considering a local currency loan for up to PHP 450 million<br />
(approximately $10 million) with IFC support to finance its capital expenditure program in essential<br />
infrastructure identified in the city’s Annual Investment Plan. The planned transaction would not involve<br />
inter-governmental transfers as security, and if successful, would be the first example of a Philippine local<br />
government accessing market-based financing.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Adriana de Aguinaga<br />
Program Manager<br />
1
Seventy-One Activities worth $9.5 Million Approved in the First Three Quarters of<br />
Fiscal 2012<br />
PPIAF approved 71 PPIAF and SNTA activities in the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, worth a<br />
total of $9.5 million, as presented in Table 1 below.<br />
Table 1: Funding Source<br />
Source No. of Activities Value (USD)<br />
PPIAF Activities 59 8,267,380<br />
SNTA Activities 12 1,235,825<br />
Total 71 9,503,205<br />
B. The geographic focus of the 59 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 2. Activities<br />
in Sub-Saharan Africa represented the largest share of the portfolio, accounting for 41% of the portfolio.<br />
In the SNTA program, activities in Sub-Saharan Africa also represented the largest share of the portfolio<br />
(42%), as summarized in Table 3.<br />
Table 2: Geographic Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />
Region<br />
Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
2<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No. of<br />
Projects<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa 3,409,435 41 27 46<br />
Middle East & North Africa 1,367,050 17 7 12<br />
Global 933,000 11 3 5<br />
Latin America & the Caribbean 874,775 11 5 8<br />
Eastern Europe & Central Asia 773,100 9 6 10<br />
South Asia 489,400 6 7 12<br />
East Asia & the Pacific 420,620 5 4 7<br />
Total 8,267,380 100 59 100<br />
Table 3: Geographic Focus of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />
Region<br />
Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No. of<br />
Projects<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa 519,745 42 5 41<br />
Latin America & the Caribbean 329,780 27 3 25<br />
Middle East & North Africa 236,300 19 2 17<br />
East Asia & the Pacific 150,000 12 2 17<br />
Total 1,235,825 100 12 100
C. The sectoral focus of the 59 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 4. Energy<br />
activities accounted for 35% of the portfolio, totaling over $2.5 million.<br />
Table 4: Sectoral Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />
Sector<br />
Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
3<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No. of<br />
Projects<br />
Energy 2,552,415 35 14 24<br />
Multi-sector 2,324,584 24 17 29<br />
Telecommunications 1,212,080 15 8 13<br />
Water & sanitation 1,123,481 13 13 22<br />
Transport 1,054,820 13 7 12<br />
Total 8,267,380 100 59 100<br />
D. The primary action areas of the 59 approved PPIAF activities are summarized in Table 5 1 .<br />
Activities focused on infrastructure development strategies took the largest share of funding, representing<br />
46% of the portfolio. The primary action areas of the approved SNTA activities are summarized in Table<br />
6.<br />
Table 5: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />
Action Area<br />
Infrastructure development<br />
strategies<br />
Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No. of<br />
Projects<br />
3,802,293 46 26 44<br />
Pioneering transactions 2,019,020 24 11 19<br />
Consensus building 200,000 2 1 2<br />
Capacity building 787,776 10 11 18<br />
Policy, regulatory, and<br />
institutional reforms<br />
750,291 9 8 14<br />
Emerging best practice 708,000 9 2 3<br />
Total 8,267,380 100 59 100<br />
1 In practice, many approved activities from the PPIAF and SNTA funds comprise actions that correspond to two or<br />
more of these specific categories. The breakdown above is based on the PMU’s judgment as to the primary focus of<br />
each approved activity.
Table 6: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />
Action Area<br />
Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
4<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No. of<br />
Projects<br />
Specific performance improvement 609,295 49 6 50<br />
Financing 296,750 24 3 25<br />
Other 254,780 21 2 17<br />
Credit rating 75,000 6 1 8<br />
Total 1,235,825 100 12 100<br />
E. The breakdown of PPIAF and SNTA support by funding source in the first three quarters of<br />
fiscal 2012 is presented below in Table 7.<br />
Table 7: Breakdown of PPIAF and SNTA support by funding source<br />
Source of funds<br />
Total<br />
Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No. of<br />
Projects<br />
Multi-Donor Trust Fund II 3,613,383 37 29 41<br />
Sweden Sub-Saharan Africa Fund 1,443,660 15 4 6<br />
SNTA 1,235,825 13 12 17<br />
SECO/DFID: Response to the Global<br />
Financial Crisis<br />
748,365 8 5 7<br />
IFC Fragile States 640,401 7 6 8<br />
Norway/Netherlands: Integrating<br />
Climate Change Agenda with PPP<br />
Program<br />
634,850 7 4 6<br />
SECO: Middle-Income Countries 563,671 6 6 8<br />
Austria Climate Change 400,600 4 1 1<br />
Japan: Contribution from the Policy<br />
and Human Resources Development<br />
Fund (PHRD)<br />
USAID for Water and Sanitation<br />
Fund for Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
150,000 2 2 3<br />
72,450 1 2 3<br />
Total 9,503,205 100 71 100<br />
A list of all PPIAF and SNTA approved activities during the first three quarters is included in Annex 1.
Annex 1<br />
Approved Activities for the Period July 1, 2011–March 31, 2012<br />
Activities approved from the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Funds have been shaded using the key below. All<br />
other activities were approved from PPIAF’s Core Trust Fund, which includes IFC Fragile States and<br />
Austria Climate Change activities.<br />
Core funds:<br />
Japan: Contribution from the Policy and Human Resources Development Fund (PHRD)<br />
Norway/Netherlands: Integrating Climate Change Agenda with PPP Program<br />
SECO/DFID: Response to the Global Financial Crisis<br />
SECO: Middle-Income Countries<br />
Sweden Sub-Saharan Africa Fund<br />
USAID for Water and Sanitation Fund for Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
Austria Climate Change<br />
IFC Fragile States<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
PPIAF Activities<br />
1. AFRICA: African<br />
Energy Ministers'<br />
Conference<br />
2. AFRICA: Legal<br />
Services in Support of<br />
the West African Power<br />
Pool’s Power Interconnector<br />
Project for<br />
Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia,<br />
Sierra Leone, and<br />
Guinea<br />
Promoting the dissemination of knowledge<br />
on technical and financial solutions for<br />
expanded access to low-carbon sources of<br />
energy. This activity will facilitate the<br />
formation of consensus on priorities for<br />
supporting Africa's low carbon, climate<br />
resilient energy development agenda,<br />
including in the context of climate change<br />
negotiations.<br />
Assisting the task team to further develop<br />
and finalize the various legal agreements<br />
involved in establishing the Special<br />
Purpose Companies and providing the<br />
appropriate framework for commercial and<br />
private sector transactions on the line. This<br />
work complements other studies that are<br />
underway to prepare an institutional<br />
business plan and the legal framework for<br />
the inter-connector project.<br />
5<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$40,000 Energy<br />
$70,800 Energy<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
3. AFRICA: Lighting<br />
Africa Expansion<br />
4. AFRICA: Regional<br />
Conference on PPPs in<br />
Water and Sanitation in<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />
5. BURUNDI: Project<br />
Pipeline Screening and<br />
Initial Feasibility<br />
Assessment of Potential<br />
Infrastructure PPPs in<br />
the Energy Sector<br />
6. CAMEROON:<br />
Support to the Cameroon<br />
Water Sector<br />
7. COMOROS: Options<br />
Evaluation and Strategic<br />
Roadmap for the<br />
Telecommunications<br />
Sector of the Union of<br />
Comoros<br />
8. COTE D'IVOIRE:<br />
Improving Users’<br />
Awareness on Cost<br />
Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development-Additional<br />
funding<br />
Increasing access to off-grid lighting and<br />
micro-energy systems for the poor in eight<br />
African countries by replicating the<br />
successful market-development pilots<br />
implemented previously in Kenya and<br />
Ghana with PPIAF support. This activity is<br />
co-financed with AFREA, Norwegian Trust<br />
Fund, ESMAP, GPOBA, and CDKN.<br />
Explaining what the private sector has to<br />
offer in the delivery of water and sanitation<br />
services in Sub-Saharan Africa. The<br />
conference will be held in Dakar, Senegal<br />
on June 5–8, 2012.<br />
Providing advisory support to improve<br />
energy sector investment planning and<br />
provide pipeline screening of potential<br />
PPPs.<br />
Helping the government of the Republic of<br />
Cameroon to identify and propose solutions<br />
towards more effective cooperation<br />
between the Government, Camwater and<br />
Camerounaise des Eaux that will improve<br />
the implementation of the water PPP and<br />
restore the financial equilibrium of the<br />
sector.<br />
Analyzing the options to facilitate<br />
competition in the telecommunications<br />
sector, identifying the necessary steps to<br />
develop robust competition in the sector,<br />
and preparing a sector roadmap for the<br />
government. The proposed activity and<br />
sector roadmap will provide critical inputs to<br />
the preparation of an investment project.<br />
The investment project will enable Comoros<br />
to join a regional connectivity adaptable<br />
program loan program for Eastern and<br />
Southern Africa.<br />
Supporting the government of Côte<br />
d’Ivoire’s efforts raise awareness, build<br />
users’ coalition and to demonstrate<br />
concrete improvements in the lives of its<br />
citizens, a critical step for sustaining social<br />
and political stability in the country. This<br />
activity will educate infrastructure users on<br />
the urgent need for their participation in<br />
funding the development of the country's<br />
infrastructure to improve its sustainability.<br />
6<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$250,000 Energy<br />
$50,000 Water<br />
$74,500 Energy<br />
$40,000 Water<br />
$75,000 Telecom<br />
$67,438<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Emerging Best<br />
Practices<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
9. COTE D'IVOIRE:<br />
PPP Pipeline and<br />
Enabling Environment<br />
Support<br />
10. GABON: PPP<br />
Program<br />
11. GHANA: Institutional<br />
Options for Improving<br />
Urban Water Supply in<br />
Ghana (Phase 2)<br />
12. GUINEA: Mining<br />
Ancillary Infrastructure<br />
13. GUINEA: PPP<br />
Training Workshop<br />
14. GUINEA-BISSAU:<br />
PPP Training Workshop<br />
15. LESOTHO: Legal<br />
Advisory Support to ICT<br />
and Facilities<br />
Management PPP<br />
16. KENYA: Lake<br />
Turkana Wind Due<br />
Diligence Project<br />
Strengthening the enabling environment in<br />
Côte d'Ivoire through targeted policy<br />
recommendations and identifying a pipeline<br />
of PPPs that could be prepared now and<br />
brought on the market in the immediate<br />
future.<br />
Enabling the government of Gabon to<br />
advance its PPP agenda from both a<br />
transaction and enabling environment stand<br />
point. This activity will include an enabling<br />
environment assessment, PPP pipeline<br />
diagnostic, and options for creating<br />
institutional capacity on PPPs.<br />
Conducting a detailed options analysis for<br />
institutional reform of the urban water<br />
sector in Ghana, in an attempt improve the<br />
performance and financial sustainability of<br />
the sector. It is hoped that such reform will<br />
lead to the commercialization of the sector<br />
and increased private sector investment.<br />
Supporting the government of Guinea in<br />
creating an enabling environment for the<br />
realization of PPPs in mining ancillary<br />
infrastructure development.<br />
Supporting a three-day PPP training<br />
workshop that will be a learning platform for<br />
approx. 50 key stakeholders to share best<br />
practices and emerging lessons regarding<br />
the design, implementation and monitoring<br />
of PPPs, focused on sectors that are<br />
directly relevant to Guinea.<br />
Supporting a three-day PPP training<br />
workshop to build the capacity of<br />
stakeholders involved in PPP project<br />
development and increase awareness of<br />
PPPs.<br />
Providing legal consultant to support the<br />
International Finance Corporation’s work in<br />
the development and implementation of an<br />
ICT and Facilities Management PPP<br />
transaction.<br />
Providing technical, commercial, legal, and<br />
financial expertise to the Kenya Power<br />
Company to support the development of<br />
the Lake Turkana Wind Project. This<br />
activity includes a review of project<br />
documents, providing strategic inputs, and<br />
supporting the Kenya Power Company in<br />
Power Purchase Agreement negotiations.<br />
7<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$74,640<br />
$74,640<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
$68,431 Water<br />
$490,000 Transport<br />
$57,763<br />
$49,963<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
$301,160 Telecom<br />
$294,900 Energy<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
17. MALI: Capacity<br />
Building Support to the<br />
Scatec and Kenie<br />
Projects<br />
18. MALI: Improving<br />
Governance and<br />
Accountability to Foster<br />
an Enabling Environment<br />
for Private Sector<br />
Participation in the<br />
Electricity and Water<br />
Sectors<br />
19. MALI: Legal<br />
Advisory to the<br />
Government of Mali for<br />
the Scatec Solar Project<br />
20. MOZAMBIQUE:<br />
Preparation of a Gas<br />
Sector Master Plan<br />
21. NIGER: Evaluation<br />
of Projects with Private<br />
Participation for<br />
Production and Supply of<br />
Electricity in Rural Areas<br />
22. NIGERIA: Support<br />
for Private Development<br />
of the Power Sector<br />
23. NIGERIA: Workshop<br />
on Water Utility Reform<br />
24. RWANDA: Kigali<br />
Bulk Water Supply<br />
Project—Technical<br />
Assistance and Capacity<br />
Training<br />
Providing transaction support to the<br />
government of Mali to review and negotiate<br />
the Scatec solar and Kenie hydropower<br />
projects as PPPs.<br />
Assisting the government of Mali to<br />
restructure the energy and water sectors by<br />
reviewing existing regulatory framework<br />
and practices, including the role of key<br />
stakeholders, evaluating existing and<br />
envisaged PPP arrangements, and<br />
formulating guidance on avoiding and/or<br />
managing potential risks.<br />
Assisting the government of Mali to review<br />
and negotiate the legal documentation for<br />
the Scatec Solar PPP project.<br />
Supporting the development of a gas sector<br />
roadmap in Mozambique with an emphasis<br />
on stimulating private sector participation.<br />
This activity will develop a gas master plan,<br />
identify sector reforms necessary to attract<br />
private investment, and prepare policy<br />
decisions to help the government of<br />
Mozambique meet its petroleum objectives.<br />
Supporting the government of Niger in the<br />
preliminary assessment of potential<br />
infrastructure projects to develop a pipeline<br />
of feasible projects with private sector<br />
participation. The result of the assessment<br />
will serve to inform future government<br />
decisions on which projects to prioritize for<br />
further development as IPPs or PPPs.<br />
Supporting the creation of a conducive<br />
investment environment for private sector<br />
generating companies selling power to the<br />
bulk trader and building capacity among<br />
local stakeholders in developing, financing,<br />
and contracting for Independent Power<br />
Producers.<br />
Supporting a workshop to examine the core<br />
issues that confront management of<br />
underperforming utilities in Nigeria on a<br />
daily basis.<br />
Assisting the Energy, Water and Sanitation<br />
Authority to identify the best organizational<br />
structure, develop a long-term master plan,<br />
and strengthen its monitoring and<br />
management capacity.<br />
8<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$49,890 Energy<br />
$74,890<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector<br />
$49,950 Energy<br />
$250,000 Energy<br />
$60,000 Energy<br />
$402,500 Energy<br />
$32,450 Water<br />
$207,700 Water<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Capacity<br />
Building
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
25. SOUTH AFRICA:<br />
Pre-feasibility Study for a<br />
Cycling Program in the<br />
City of Johannesburg<br />
26. SUDAN: South<br />
Sudan-Diagnostic of<br />
Power Distribution<br />
System<br />
27. ZIMBABWE:<br />
Assessment of PPP<br />
Enabling Environment<br />
and PPP Pipeline<br />
Supporting a pre-feasibility study to<br />
determine the steps and projects which<br />
would make up a comprehensive,<br />
sustainable and integrated cycling program<br />
in the city of Johannesburg.<br />
Conducting a diagnostic study to<br />
determining the investment and energy<br />
requirements to upgrade/rehabilitate the<br />
power distribution system in Juba, South<br />
Sudan.<br />
Providing technical assistance to the<br />
government of Zimbabwe to develop and<br />
implement its PPP program in the<br />
transportation, electricity,<br />
telecommunication, and water sectors.<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
SNTA Activities<br />
28. AFRICA: Regional<br />
Capacity Building<br />
Workshop with Agence<br />
Française de<br />
Développement on<br />
Revenue Management<br />
29. BURKINA FASO:<br />
Strengthening of Fiscal<br />
Revenues for the<br />
Municipality of<br />
Ouagadougou<br />
30. GHANA: Increasing<br />
Access to Market-Based<br />
Financing for<br />
Municipalities in the<br />
Greater Accra Area<br />
Enhancing the ability of the cities to<br />
effectively collect their revenues and to<br />
generate additional resources. Through the<br />
improvement of their financial health and<br />
performance, the cities will increase their<br />
ability to raise funds and invest in<br />
infrastructures related to service delivery.<br />
Supporting the analysis of how to optimize<br />
fiscal and non fiscal resources for the city of<br />
Ouagadougou. The realization of this<br />
analysis is part of a series of initiatives that<br />
follow the recommendations of the Public<br />
Expenditure Financial Accountability<br />
assessment, prepared for that city with<br />
PPIAF and Agence Français de<br />
Développement support, on how to<br />
strengthen the financial health of the city.<br />
Preparing a diagnostic of the structure of the<br />
market for financial tools for the local<br />
governments and municipal/state owned<br />
enterprises in charge of public infrastructure<br />
to develop urban infrastructure in Ghana.<br />
The main objective of this activity is to<br />
increase local governments and<br />
municipal/state owned enterprises' access<br />
to private credit to finance public<br />
infrastructure.<br />
9<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
$74,820 Transport Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
$75,000 Energy<br />
$53,000<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$75,000<br />
$75,000<br />
$175,000<br />
Multisector<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
Specific<br />
performance<br />
improvement<br />
Financing<br />
Financing
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
31. KENYA:<br />
Assessment of<br />
Geothermal<br />
Development Company<br />
for Enhanced Access to<br />
Finance<br />
32. MAURITANIA:<br />
PEFA Study for the<br />
Communauté Urbaine<br />
de Nouakchott<br />
East Asia and the Pacific<br />
Conducting a quick diagnosis of the financial<br />
situation and administration of the<br />
Geothermal Development Company to<br />
identify critical success factors, key<br />
performance areas, weaknesses, and the<br />
risks. The review will also include a systemic<br />
review of the financial management<br />
arrangements looking at the budgeting,<br />
accounting, financial reporting, internal<br />
audit, and internal control.<br />
Conducting a financial management<br />
assessment of the Communauté Urbaine de<br />
Noukchott to strengthen the municipality's<br />
financial performance.<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
PPIAF Activities<br />
33. PHILIPPINES:<br />
Options to Expand<br />
Private Sector<br />
Participation in the<br />
Development of the<br />
Irrigation Sector<br />
34. LAOS: Transport<br />
Sector Enabling<br />
Environment Assessment<br />
and Pipeline Screening<br />
35. VIETNAM:<br />
Feasibility Study and<br />
PPP Options for the<br />
Implementation of a<br />
Nation-Wide e-ID System<br />
for the Delivery of Public<br />
Services<br />
36. VIETNAM:<br />
Strengthening of the Use<br />
of Performance-Based<br />
Contracts for Road<br />
Maintenance<br />
Supporting the Department of Agriculture<br />
to identify and address policy, regulatory,<br />
and institutional constraints that limit the<br />
recourse to PPPs; develop the capacity to<br />
identify viable and bankable projects and<br />
to plan and manage the development of<br />
the irrigation sector; and identify a pipeline<br />
of bankable projects, some of which could<br />
be supported during a follow-up phase.<br />
Supporting the government of Lao PDR to<br />
conduct the preliminary assessment of the<br />
potential for PPPs in Lao PDR as an input<br />
to the Lao National Strategy for Transport<br />
Sector.<br />
Assisting the government of Vietnam<br />
formulate a sound infrastructure<br />
development strategy and build capacity in<br />
the design and execution of a PPP e-ID<br />
system. The proposed TA will be<br />
comprised of three major components: a<br />
PPP options study and recommendations;<br />
a series of capacity-building activities; and<br />
knowledge dissemination.<br />
Analyzing the current approach to<br />
performance-based contracts for road<br />
maintenance in Vietnam and developing a<br />
road map to strengthen these contracts.<br />
10<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
$46,750 Energy Financing<br />
$147,995<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Multisector<br />
$100,000 Water<br />
$50,000 Transport<br />
$230,620 Telecom<br />
$40,000 Transport<br />
Specific<br />
performance<br />
improvement<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
SNTA Activities<br />
37. INDONESIA: Jakarta<br />
Credit Rating<br />
38. PHILIPPINES:<br />
Assisting Tanuan City in<br />
Enhancing the City’s<br />
Creditworthiness<br />
Eastern Europe and Central Asia<br />
Supporting the updated credit rating and<br />
financial management assessment of DKI<br />
Jakarta, and strengthening of Jakarta’s<br />
newly established Debt Management Unit<br />
in assessing and monitoring debt.<br />
Supporting the city of Tanuan in<br />
enhancing its capacity for fiscal and<br />
financial management to improve its<br />
bankability and creditworthiness.<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
PPIAF Activities<br />
39. ALBANIA: Technical<br />
Assessments of Bistrica<br />
1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and<br />
Shkopeti Hydropower<br />
Plants<br />
40. ALBANIA: Universal<br />
Access and Service<br />
Policy Framework in the<br />
ICT Sector<br />
41. ARMENIA: Advisory<br />
Support for Private<br />
Sector Involvement in<br />
Operation of Regional<br />
Bus-Stations<br />
42. ARMENIA: Support<br />
to the Armenia Water<br />
and Sewerage Company<br />
with the design of the<br />
enhanced Management<br />
Contract for 2011–2013<br />
Helping the government of Albania<br />
prepare a privatization strategy for<br />
hydropower plants. Technical,<br />
environmental, and social impact<br />
assessments will be conducted in this<br />
activity.<br />
Assisting the Authority of Electronic and<br />
Postal Communications to develop a<br />
comprehensive policy for its Universal<br />
Access and Service Program.<br />
Developing a plan for the improvement of<br />
the performance of bus stations<br />
operations through private sector<br />
involvement. This activity will develop<br />
performance standards for bus station<br />
operations, assess the operator's financial<br />
condition, and identify possible sources for<br />
additional revenue.<br />
Supporting the State Committee on Water<br />
Economy to prepare and process an<br />
enhanced Management Contract with the<br />
incumbent operator for the Armenia Water<br />
and Sewerage Company service area for<br />
2011–2013. This activity will ensure the<br />
contract's compliance with the overall long<br />
term economic/financial goals of the<br />
sector.<br />
11<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$75,000<br />
$75,000<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
$75,000 Energy<br />
$148,100 Telecom<br />
$75,000 Transport<br />
$75,000 Water<br />
Credit Rating<br />
Specific<br />
performance<br />
improvement<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
43. MOLDOVA:<br />
Feasibility Study for<br />
Cloud-Based Shared<br />
Infrastructure PPP<br />
44. TAJIKISTAN:<br />
Drafting a new<br />
Investment Law in<br />
Tajikistan<br />
Global activities<br />
Funding the completion of an M-Cloud<br />
feasibility study that will describe various<br />
options for developing and managing an<br />
M-Cloud PPP, detail relative advantages<br />
and disadvantages of each, identify risks<br />
and suggest risks allocation and mitigation<br />
strategies.<br />
Providing technical assistance to draft a<br />
new investment law and to conduct an<br />
independent valuation of two silver<br />
deposits in Tajikistan.<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
PPIAF Activities<br />
45. GLOBAL: Leaders in<br />
Urban Transport<br />
Program—Translation<br />
and Workshop Delivery<br />
46. GLOBAL: PPI<br />
Database Funding for<br />
FY12 and FY13<br />
47. GLOBAL: The<br />
Governance of Basic<br />
Local Public Services -<br />
3 rd Global Report on<br />
Decentralization and<br />
Local Democracy (GOLD<br />
III)<br />
Responding to a high demand for the<br />
Leaders in Urban Transport Program by<br />
translating all the course material in<br />
French and by delivering two workshops<br />
for an audience of policymakers from lowto-mid-income<br />
French speaking<br />
developing countries.<br />
Supporting the PPI database to provide<br />
critical data and analysis in an objective<br />
manner to government policy-makers,<br />
academia, the donor community, and<br />
other stakeholders. The PPI database<br />
disseminates information on trends in the<br />
private provision of infrastructure services,<br />
provides detailed project-level data, and<br />
identifies emerging trends and changing<br />
market conditions.<br />
Supporting United Cities & Local<br />
Governments to produce the 3rd Global<br />
Report, which will identify the role of local<br />
authorities in providing basic services. The<br />
report will focus on better understanding<br />
this role, the possibilities of partnering with<br />
other stakeholders, and identifying which<br />
future developments should be promoted<br />
to improve access to basic services.<br />
12<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$200,000 Telecom<br />
$200,000<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector<br />
$75,000 Transport<br />
$658,000<br />
$200,000<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Emerging Best<br />
Practices<br />
Consensus<br />
Building
Latin America and the Caribbean<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
PPIAF Activities<br />
48. BRAZIL: Improving<br />
the Sustainable Forestry<br />
Concession Model in the<br />
Amazon<br />
49. COLOMBIA: Private<br />
Financing Window for<br />
Low-Income Housing<br />
Projects<br />
50. PANAMA:<br />
Preparation of a<br />
Performance-Based<br />
Efficiency Improvement<br />
Contract for IDAAN’s<br />
Colón Business Unit<br />
51. PERU: PPP Options<br />
for Irrigation<br />
Infrastructure<br />
52. URUGUAY:<br />
Development of<br />
Financing Options for<br />
PPPs in Roads Sector<br />
Developing a forestry concession model<br />
and advising the concession process of<br />
the National Forests (―Flonas‖) of Itaituba I<br />
& II, located in the Brazilian State of Pará.<br />
The total area of these two Flonas is<br />
641,105 hectares. The concession<br />
comprises a natural production forest with<br />
a project area of 416,718 hectares,<br />
including 333,000 hectares of net<br />
productive area, and is one of the first<br />
concessions of the second round of<br />
sustainable forestry management<br />
concessions carried out by the Brazilian<br />
Forest Service.<br />
Supporting the government of Colombia in<br />
structuring and developing a ―window‖ to<br />
evaluate and screen private Second<br />
Generation Macroproyectos. This activity<br />
will provide important support to the<br />
government to successfully harness<br />
private sector interest in developing the<br />
approximately 7,000 hectares of land<br />
identified under the Macroproyectos<br />
program.<br />
Supporting the design and preparation of<br />
bidding documents for a performancebased<br />
contract with a private operator;<br />
preparing bidding documents for the<br />
supervision contract for the company in<br />
charge of monitoring the operator’s<br />
performance targets and the execution of<br />
the contract’s activities; and dissemination<br />
of the contract and bidding process<br />
documentation.<br />
Advising the government of Peru on how<br />
to improve the prospects for PPP in<br />
irrigation in the country in general and,<br />
more specifically, to provide<br />
recommendations on how to improve the<br />
Chavimochic PPP model in order to<br />
achieve a successful deal.<br />
Providing transaction assistance to the<br />
government of Uruguay to review existing<br />
road projects, assess their overall<br />
bankability, and identify and develop<br />
financial instruments for the PPP<br />
structure. This activity will provide<br />
guidance on how best to set up an<br />
appropriate and sustainable financial<br />
scheme for PPP agreements, including<br />
commercial and legal aspects.<br />
13<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$400,000<br />
$74,800<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
$74,975 Water<br />
$75,000 Water<br />
$250,000 Transport<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
SNTA Activities<br />
53. BELIZE: Improve<br />
Municipal<br />
Creditworthiness for<br />
Belize Municipalities<br />
54. COLOMBIA:<br />
Feasibility Study to<br />
Develop Tradable Air<br />
Rights Instruments to<br />
Mobilize Private<br />
Financing for Bogotá’s<br />
Carrera 7 Bus Rapid<br />
Transit Corridor<br />
55. MEXICO:<br />
Strengthening Lending<br />
Market for Small<br />
Mexican Municipalities<br />
Middle East and North Africa<br />
Assisting town and city councils implement<br />
the recommendations of the Municipal<br />
Finance and Revenue Enhancement<br />
Report. Using this diagnostic tool, and<br />
working with the Local Government Officer<br />
based in the Ministry of Local Government<br />
and Rural Development, this activity will<br />
support each of the councils to implement<br />
recommendations to improve their financial<br />
management systems, enhance their<br />
creditworthiness by increasing their<br />
revenue collection, and improve the<br />
efficiency of their expenditure.<br />
Analyzing the feasibility of developing and<br />
implementing a tradable air rights<br />
instrument to increase functional densities<br />
in zones adjacent to Bogotá’s Carrera 7<br />
―Green Corridor‖, and mobilize private<br />
sources of financing to the project.<br />
Assessing the development methodology<br />
of a credit risk model created by a Mexican<br />
non-bank financial institution for portfolio<br />
level analysis of a loan book. This activity<br />
will review the model's ability to predict<br />
ratings and map the model's outputs to a<br />
measure of probability of default and/or<br />
expected loss.<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
PPIAF Activities<br />
56. DJIBOUTI: Energy<br />
Sector Assessment<br />
57. DJIBOUTI:<br />
Feasibility Assessment<br />
for Solar Rural<br />
Electrification<br />
Assisting the government of Djibouti to<br />
refine its energy sector master plan,<br />
assessing the cost of refurbishing existing<br />
generation plants, and identifying least<br />
cost infrastructure investments that can be<br />
effectively financed and managed through<br />
a PPP.<br />
Analyzing the technical, economic and<br />
financial feasibility of rural electrification<br />
options to determine the most viable and<br />
sustainable roll-out option available to<br />
electrify each of 25 villages in Djibouti.<br />
14<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$75,000 Multi-sector<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
$179,780 Multi-sector Other<br />
$75,000 Multi-sector Other<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$459,275 Energy<br />
$400,600 Energy<br />
Specific<br />
performance<br />
improvement<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
58. DJIBOUTI: Options<br />
for Telecoms Sector<br />
Liberalization in Djibouti<br />
59. LEBANON:<br />
Improving the<br />
Performance of the<br />
Beka’a Regional Water<br />
Authority<br />
60. MIDDLE EAST AND<br />
NORTH AFRICA:<br />
Developing Alternative<br />
Broadband Networks<br />
61. MIDDLE EAST AND<br />
NORTH AFRICA:<br />
Training Course on PPPs<br />
in the Water Sector<br />
62. WEST BANK AND<br />
GAZA: Southern West<br />
Bank Solid Waste<br />
Management Project<br />
Helping the government of Djibouti<br />
develop a strategy to transform the<br />
telecommunications sector into an engine<br />
of economic growth and employment.<br />
Strengthening the Beka'a Region Water<br />
Authority's engagement with the private<br />
sector and examining its current PPP to<br />
ensure the private operator is able to<br />
respond to the utility's needs in an efficient<br />
and cost-effective manner.<br />
Assessing the potential of activating<br />
installed unused fiber optic capacity in the<br />
region to form a regional backbone<br />
network.<br />
Conducting a training seminar to introduce<br />
PPPs to water sector professionals in the<br />
West Bank and Gaza, Iraq, and Jordan.<br />
This workshop will raise general<br />
awareness of the PPP process, its<br />
advantages and challenges, as well as<br />
financing modalities available for PPP<br />
development.<br />
Providing legal support for the<br />
development of a solid waste<br />
management PPP.<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
SNTA Activities<br />
63. LEBANON:<br />
Facilitating Sub-National<br />
Government Access to<br />
Commercial Credit and<br />
Capital Markets<br />
64. WEST BANK AND<br />
GAZA: Improving<br />
Municipal Revenue<br />
Generation Policies and<br />
Framework<br />
Conducting a quick diagnosis of the<br />
financial and administrative performance<br />
of the Al-Fayhaa Union of Municipalities,<br />
and the municipalities of Tripoli, Mina, and<br />
Beddawi. Key reforms to improve the<br />
municipalites' financial administration and<br />
increase access to capital markets will be<br />
identified.<br />
Formulating and implementing evidencebased<br />
policies and programs on municipal<br />
finance, with an emphasis on municipal<br />
revenue generation.<br />
15<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$107,690 Telecom<br />
$75,000 Water<br />
$74,510 Telecom<br />
$50,000 Water<br />
$199,975 Water<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$75,000<br />
$161,300<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Pioneering<br />
Transactions<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
Specific<br />
performance<br />
improvement<br />
Specific<br />
performance<br />
improvement
South Asia<br />
Country/Title Activity Description<br />
PPIAF Activities<br />
65. BHUTAN: Prefeasibility<br />
Assessment of<br />
Infrastructure Projects<br />
Under a PPP Model<br />
66. BHUTAN: Telecom<br />
Sector Policy Roadmap<br />
67. INDIA: Assistance in<br />
Finalization of a PPP<br />
Policy<br />
68. MALDIVES:<br />
Contract Management<br />
Support for Solid Waste<br />
Management PPP<br />
69. NEPAL: Screening<br />
and Initial Feasibility<br />
Assessment of Potential<br />
Private-Public<br />
Infrastructure Projects<br />
70. SRI LANKA:<br />
Identifying PPP<br />
Opportunities for Local<br />
Governments<br />
71. SRI LANKA: Prefeasibility<br />
Assessment of<br />
Infrastructure Projects<br />
under a PPP Model<br />
Supporting the Royal Government of<br />
Bhutan in the preliminary assessment of<br />
potential infrastructure projects to develop<br />
a pipeline of feasible PPP transactions,<br />
including preparing a preliminary<br />
assessment of the feasibility of several<br />
infrastructure projects by providing<br />
assistance for pre-feasibility studies.<br />
Developing a strategic policy roadmap to<br />
guide the development of Bhutan's<br />
telecom sector on introduction of<br />
competition, divestment by the existing<br />
operators, and government transformation<br />
agenda to use the telecom sector for costeffective<br />
service delivery.<br />
Developing a PPP policy framework to<br />
clarify existing guidelines and create new<br />
policies on developing, contracting, and<br />
managing PPPs.<br />
Providing management contract support to<br />
Male City Council to structure and<br />
implement a viable tariff structure for<br />
waste management services, develop a<br />
mechanism for tariff collection, develop an<br />
information system to maintain user data,<br />
and monitor the performance of the<br />
concessionaire.<br />
Identifying potential projects in the urban<br />
and transport sector that are suitable for<br />
financing under the private-public<br />
partnership. This activity will assist the<br />
government in deciding modalities for<br />
future investments in these sectors.<br />
Developing the capacity of the Ministry of<br />
Economic Development and selected<br />
Provincial and Local Governments in Sri<br />
Lanka to identify the potential for private<br />
participation in infrastructure development.<br />
This activity will also develop a prioritized<br />
list of possible projects that could then be<br />
translated into PPP transactions with<br />
further support in the future.<br />
Supporting the government of Sri Lanka in<br />
the preliminary assessment of potential<br />
infrastructure projects to develop a<br />
pipeline of feasible PPP transactions.<br />
16<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$64,450<br />
Sector Action Area<br />
Multisector<br />
$75,000 Telecom<br />
$75,000<br />
Multisector<br />
$74,950 Water<br />
$50,000<br />
$75,000<br />
$75,000<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Policy,<br />
regulatory, and<br />
institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Strategies
PPIAF and SNTA Total Funding in Q1-Q3 FY2012 vs. Q1-Q3 FY2011—Regional and Sectoral Split<br />
PPIAF and SNTA Funding Approved in Q1-Q3 FY2012<br />
PPIAF SNTA<br />
FY2012<br />
FY2012<br />
Total Count by Region: Total $ by Region<br />
Total $ by Region:<br />
Total Count by Region:<br />
AFRICA 27 46% AFRICA $3,409,435 41% AFRICA $519,745 42% AFRICA 5 42%<br />
CROSS-REGIONAL 0 0% CROSS-REGIONAL $0 0% EAP $150,000 12% EAP 2 17%<br />
EAP 4 7% EAP $420,620 5% ECA $0 0% ECA 0 0%<br />
ECA 6 10% ECA $773,100 9% GLOBAL $0 0% GLOBAL 0 0%<br />
GLOBAL 3 5% GLOBAL $933,000 11% LAC $329,780 27% LAC 3 25%<br />
LAC 5 8% LAC $874,775 11% MENA $236,300 19% MENA 2 17%<br />
MENA 7 12% MENA $1,367,050 17% SAR $0 0% SAR 0 0%<br />
SAR 7 12% SAR $489,400 6% Total $1,235,825 100% Total 12 100%<br />
Total 59 100% Total $8,267,380 100%<br />
Total $ by Sector:<br />
Total Count by Sector:<br />
Total Count by Sector Total $ by Sector<br />
ENERGY $46,750 4% ENERGY 1 8%<br />
ENERGY 14 24% ENERGY $2,552,415 31% MULTI $1,189,075 96% MULTI 11 92%<br />
MULTI 17 29% MULTI $2,324,584 28% TELECOM $0 0% TELECOM 0 0%<br />
TELECOM 8 14% TELECOM $1,212,080 15% TRANSPORT $0 0% TRANSPORT 0 0%<br />
TRANSPORT 7 12% TRANSPORT $1,054,820 13% WATER $0 0% WATER 0 0%<br />
WATER 13 22% WATER $1,123,481 14% Total $1,235,825 100% Total 12 100%<br />
Total 59 100% Total $8,267,380 100%<br />
PPIAF and SNTA Funding Approved in Q1-Q3 FY2011 (as comparison)<br />
PPIAF SNTA<br />
FY2011<br />
FY2011<br />
Total Count by Region: Total $ by Region<br />
Total $ by Region:<br />
Total Count by Region:<br />
AFRICA 12 34% AFRICA $1,044,880 31% AFRICA $146,005 18% AFRICA 1 20%<br />
CROSS-REGIONAL 1 3% CROSS-REGIONAL $300,000 9% EAP $0 0% EAP 0 0%<br />
EAP 3 9% EAP $176,800 5% ECA $0 0% ECA 0 0%<br />
ECA 5 14% ECA $485,450 14% GLOBAL $0 0% GLOBAL 0 0%<br />
GLOBAL 2 6% GLOBAL $111,925 3% LAC $595,950 73% LAC 3 60%<br />
LAC 1 3% LAC $249,484 7% MENA $0 0% MENA 0 0%<br />
MENA 5 14% MENA $649,960 19% SAR $75,000 9% SAR 1 20%<br />
SAR 6 17% SAR $385,640 11% Total $816,955 100% Total 5 100%<br />
Total 35 100% Total $3,404,139 100%<br />
Total $ by Sector: Total Count by Sector:<br />
Total Count by Sector Total $ by Sector<br />
ENERGY $0 0% ENERGY 0 0%<br />
ENERGY 7 20% ENERGY $614,500 18% MULTI $741,955 91% MULTI 4 80%<br />
MULTI 11 31% MULTI $1,072,600 32% TELECOM $0 0% TELECOM 0 0%<br />
TELECOM 3 9% TELECOM $314,760 9% TRANSPORT $0 0% TRANSPORT 0 0%<br />
TRANSPORT 8 23% TRANSPORT $845,784 25% WATER $75,000 9% WATER 1 20%<br />
WATER 6 17% WATER $556,495 16% Total $816,955 100% Total 5 100%<br />
Total 35 100% Total $3,404,139 100%
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
Status of PPIAF Approved Activities Inception to Date<br />
One thousand twenty-eight activities worth over $209 million approved since inception<br />
A. PPIAF has approved 1,028 projects since inception, including 74 projects under the Sub-National Technical Assistance<br />
(SNTA) program, for a total of $209,885,159. A breakdown of the PPIAF and SNTA activities is presented in Table<br />
1 below.<br />
Table 1: Funding Source for PPIAF Activities<br />
July 1999 to March 2012<br />
Source Number of Activities Value (USD)<br />
PPIAF Activities 954 192,207,662<br />
SNTA Activities 74 17,677,497<br />
Total 1,028 209,885,159<br />
B. The geographic focus of the 954 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 2. The largest share of funding has gone<br />
to Africa, representing 35 percent of the approved projects, with a value of $66.7 million. In the SNTA window, summarized in<br />
Table 3, Africa dominates the portfolio, representing 34 percent of the approved projects, with a value of $5.9 million.<br />
Table 2: Geographic Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />
Region Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
Table 3: Geographic Focus of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No.<br />
of Projects<br />
Africa 66,686,445 35 309 32<br />
East Asia & the Pacifi c 30,319,827 16 141 15<br />
Eastern Europe & Central Asia 25,010,815 13 114 12<br />
Global 19,823,014 10 110 12<br />
South Asia 19,713,074 10 118 12<br />
Latin America & the Caribbean 18,895,157 10 100 10<br />
Middle East & North Africa 10,079,330 5 59 6<br />
Cross-Regional 1,680,000 1 3 1<br />
Total 192,207,662 100 954 100<br />
Region Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No.<br />
of Projects<br />
Africa 5,910,410 34 24 31<br />
Latin America & the Caribbean 5,885,147 33 22 30<br />
East Asia & the Pacifi c 1,959,000 11 10 14<br />
South Asia 1,627,850 9 6 8<br />
Eastern Europe & Central Asia 1,134,340 7 5 7<br />
Global Knowledge 924,450 5 5 7<br />
Middle East & North Africa 236,300 1 2 3<br />
Total 17,677,497 100 74 100
C. The sectoral focus of the 954 approved PPIAF activities is summarized in Table 4. Multi-sector activities accounted for the<br />
largest share, representing funding of over $66 million.<br />
Table 4: Sectoral Focus of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />
Sector Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
D. The primary action areas of the 954 approved PPIAF activities are summarized in Table 51. The primary action areas of the<br />
74 SNTA activities are summarized in Table 6.<br />
Table 5: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved PPIAF Activities<br />
Table 6: Primary Action Areas of Total Approved SNTA Activities<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No.<br />
of Projects<br />
Multi-sector 66,110,561 35 345 37<br />
Energy 42,666,890 22 191 20<br />
Water & sanitation 35,416,441 19 186 19<br />
Transport 31,572,385 16 152 16<br />
Telecommunications 16,441,385 9 80 8<br />
Total 192,207,662 100 954 100<br />
Action Area Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
Infrastructure development<br />
strategies<br />
Policy, regulatory, and institutional<br />
reforms<br />
Action Area Total Funding<br />
(USD)<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
% by<br />
Funding<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
% by No.<br />
of Projects<br />
74,824,776 39 341 35<br />
53,024,077 28 235 25<br />
Capacity building 23,938,994 12 148 15<br />
Emerging best practice 17,961,325 9 114 12<br />
Pioneering transactions 14,302,401 7 53 5<br />
Consensus building 7,824,365 4 64 7<br />
Other 775,000 1 1 1<br />
Total 192,207,662 100 954 100<br />
% by No.<br />
of Projects<br />
Financing 7,628,000 43 28 38<br />
Credit ratings 4,026,006 23 12 16<br />
Specifi c performance improvement 4,001,646 23 20 27<br />
Other 2,021,845 11 14 19<br />
Total 17,677,497 100 74 100<br />
1 In practice, many approved activities from the PPIAF funds comprise actions that correspond to two or more of these specifi c categories.<br />
The breakdown above is based on the PMU’s judgment as to the primary focus of each approved activity, and should thus be treated as<br />
indicative only.<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org
PPIAF Work Program 2011–2013<br />
Overarching Goal: Eliminate Poverty and Achieve Sustainable Development<br />
December 2010<br />
PPIAF’s ultimate objective is to support poverty reduction by facilitating private ownership and<br />
management and/or financing of infrastructure service delivery, which plays a critical role in economic<br />
growth. However, effective private sector participation in infrastructure poses considerable challenges for<br />
governments in developing countries, which usually face limits on their administrative capacity and other<br />
resources, and often face greater hurdles in addressing investor perceptions regarding the credibility of<br />
their transaction processes and regulatory frameworks. PPIAF was created to assist governments in<br />
removing these hurdles to private investment.<br />
PPIAF Work Program 2011–2013<br />
To better target its technical assistance, PPIAF has developed a work program to be implemented over<br />
the 2011–2013 period, structured around three strategic pillars and cross-cutting themes. These strategic<br />
pillars logically group several key development priorities identified by PPIAF’s donors, reflect the “special<br />
themes” identified for IDA 16, and organize by themes the technical assistance that has been provided by<br />
PPIAF to date and its priorities for future work.<br />
Pillar #1 Pillar #2 Pillar #3<br />
Sectors Universal Access Climate Change Urbanization<br />
Power<br />
Water<br />
Transport<br />
Telecom<br />
Irrigation<br />
Crosscutting<br />
Themes<br />
Meeting the rural<br />
electrification challenge with<br />
PPPs<br />
Helping public and private<br />
operators improve access to<br />
water in peri-urban and rural<br />
areas<br />
Using performance-based<br />
PPP contracts to design,<br />
build, and maintain highways<br />
and roads, particularly rural<br />
and peri-urban roads<br />
Supporting regulators in<br />
promoting telecom service<br />
extensions in rural areas<br />
Facilitating irrigation PPPs in<br />
areas with high potential for<br />
agricultural output<br />
improvement<br />
Using PPPs to promote<br />
energy efficiency and<br />
renewable energy<br />
Structuring dedicated<br />
adaptation and mitigation<br />
PPPs in water and<br />
wastewater<br />
Reducing, controlling, or<br />
re<strong>cover</strong>ing costs from<br />
vehicle use via toll roads,<br />
light rail, and bus systems<br />
Ensuring that private<br />
provision of telecom<br />
services is fully prepared for<br />
harsh weather problems<br />
Using PPPs to “climateproof”<br />
irrigation facilities to<br />
guard against harsh<br />
weather availability<br />
Sub-National Technical Assistance<br />
Fragile States<br />
Regional Integration<br />
Capacity Building<br />
Helping power utilities<br />
access finance and<br />
expertise to improve urban<br />
services<br />
Helping water utilities access<br />
finance and expertise for<br />
service expansion and<br />
rehabilitation<br />
Facilitating PPPs and<br />
access to financing by<br />
municipal transport agencies<br />
and authorities<br />
Working with regulators to<br />
promote broadband services<br />
in urban areas<br />
Exploring the role of SMEs<br />
in management of smallscale<br />
peri-urban irrigation
Strategic Pillars:<br />
Universal Access. To assist governments expand access to basic infrastructure services. Technical<br />
assistance will use innovative approaches to scale up access to services to underserved populations.<br />
Climate Change. To facilitate private financing and PPP arrangements that contribute to infrastructurerelated<br />
climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. That the private sector must play a role in these<br />
efforts is widely acknowledged, but the actual modalities and mechanisms have rarely been discussed in<br />
detail. PPIAF’s expertise can help structure arrangements for private support in the basic infrastructure<br />
sectors.<br />
Facilitating Urbanization. To help governments cope with the infrastructure needs associated with rapid<br />
urbanization. The work will focus on helping municipal governments and utilities develop their capacity to<br />
access private expertise and financing in order to extend and improve urban services. Financing might be<br />
accessed directly via banks or bond markets, or indirectly via PPP arrangements along with private sector<br />
expertise.<br />
Cross-cutting Themes:<br />
Sub-National Finance. PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program now has three<br />
years of successful experience in helping sub-national entities improve their creditworthiness to access<br />
market-based financing without sovereign guarantees. The value of the program is as a means to<br />
increase the funds available for improved and increased infrastructure services in all sectors and across<br />
all three of PPIAF’s strategic pillars.<br />
Fragile States. Weak institutions and high risks of conflict constrain national poverty reduction and<br />
service delivery in many fragile states. Strengthening assistance to these kinds of countries is emerging<br />
as a new PPIAF priority. While all fragile states are characterized by weak policies and institutions,<br />
country context varies considerably and efforts to attract the private sector to such countries must be<br />
carefully designed to take this into account. PPPs may not be easily feasible in many fragile states, but<br />
legal/regulatory/policy reforms are often possible and can represent first steps on the road to improved<br />
infrastructure service provision through private participation.<br />
Regional Integration. Many of the poorest developing countries, particularly those in Africa, are too<br />
small to attract private investors or operators. For example, the 40 IPP projects in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
average just over 90 MW in size, far below the 200 MW threshold commonly considered to be the<br />
minimum size for cost-effective PPPs of this kind. Regional integration enables smaller countries to join<br />
forces to develop projects of sufficient scale to attract private sector interest, as well as to have strong<br />
positive regional impacts in terms of trade facilitation and economic development.<br />
Capacity Building. The provision of capacity building for decision makers and technical staff in<br />
developing countries is critical to help them understand the benefits of increased private sector<br />
participation for improved service provision, to develop specific infrastructure projects with appropriate<br />
types and degrees of risk allocation, and to negotiate directly with the private sector the terms of the PPP<br />
agreements.
April 2012<br />
Activities Approved in Q1-Q3 of FY2012, Classified in Accordance with PPIAF’s<br />
Work Program 2011–2013<br />
The table below contains the activities approved during the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, classified in<br />
accordance with the three strategic pillars and four cross-cutting themes of PPIAF’s 2011–2013 Work<br />
Program.<br />
Pillar #1 Pillar #2 Pillar #3<br />
Sectors Universal Access Climate Change Urbanization<br />
Power<br />
Water<br />
� Burundi Pipeline Screening and<br />
Feasibility Assessment of PPPs<br />
in the Energy Sector<br />
� Djibouti Energy Sector<br />
Assessment<br />
� Lighting Africa Expansion<br />
� Mozambique Preparation of a<br />
Gas Sector Master Plan<br />
� Niger Evaluation of Rural<br />
Energy Projects with Private<br />
Sector Participation (PSP)<br />
� Nigeria Support for PSP in the<br />
Power Sector<br />
� South Sudan Power Distribution<br />
System Diagnostic<br />
� Armenia Supporting an<br />
Enhanced Management<br />
Contract for Water and<br />
Sanitation Services<br />
� Cameroon Support to Water<br />
Sector<br />
� Lebanon Improving Water Utility<br />
Performance<br />
� Maldives Contract Management<br />
Support for Solid Waste<br />
Management PPP<br />
� Nigeria Workshop on Water<br />
Utility Reform<br />
� Panama Preparation of a<br />
Performance-Based Efficiency<br />
Improvement Contract for<br />
IDAAN’s Colón Business Unit<br />
� West Bank and Gaza Solid<br />
Waste Management Project<br />
� Albania Technical<br />
Assessments of Bistrica 1,<br />
Bistrica 2, Ulza, and<br />
Shkopeti Hydropower Plants<br />
� Brazil Improving the<br />
Sustainable Forestry<br />
Concession Model in the<br />
Amazon<br />
� Djibouti Feasibility<br />
Assessment for Solar Rural<br />
Electrification<br />
� Kenya Lake Turkana Wind<br />
Due Diligence Project<br />
� Mali Capacity Building and<br />
Legal Advisory Support to<br />
the Scatec and Kenie<br />
Projects<br />
� Colombia Private Financing<br />
for Low-Income Housing<br />
Projects<br />
� Ghana Institutional Options<br />
for Improving Urban Water<br />
Supply
Pillar #1 Pillar #2 Pillar #3<br />
Sectors Universal Access Climate Change Urbanization<br />
Transport<br />
Telecom<br />
Irrigation<br />
Multisector<br />
� Albania Advisory Support for<br />
Private Sector Involvement in<br />
Operation of Regional Bus<br />
Stations<br />
� Guinea Mining Ancillary<br />
Infrastructure<br />
� Laos Transport Sector Enabling<br />
Environment Assessment and<br />
Pipeline Screening<br />
� South Africa Pre-feasibility<br />
Study for Johannesburg Cycling<br />
Program<br />
� Uruguay Financing Options for<br />
Road PPPs<br />
� Vietnam Strengthening<br />
Performance-Based Contracts<br />
for Road Maintenance<br />
� Albania ICT Universal Access<br />
and Service Policy Framework<br />
� Bhutan Telecom Sector Policy<br />
Roadmap<br />
� Comoros Telecom Options<br />
Evaluation and Strategic<br />
Roadmap<br />
� Djibouti Options for Telecoms<br />
Sector<br />
� Lesotho Legal Advisory Support<br />
to ICT and Facilities<br />
Management PPP<br />
� Moldova Feasibility Study for<br />
Cloud-Based Shared<br />
Infrastructure PPP<br />
� Vietnam Feasibility Study and<br />
PPP Options for a Nation-wide<br />
e-ID System for the Delivery of<br />
Public Services<br />
� Peru PPP Options for Irrigation<br />
Infrastructure<br />
� Philippines Options to Expand<br />
PSP in the Irrigation Sector<br />
� Bhutan Pre-feasibility<br />
Assessment of PPP Projects<br />
� India Assistance in the<br />
Finalization of a PPP Policy<br />
� Mali Supporting an Enabling<br />
Environment for PSP in the<br />
Electricity and Water Sectors<br />
� Nepal Screening and Initial<br />
Feasibility Assessment of<br />
Potential PPP Projects<br />
� Sri Lanka Pre-feasibility<br />
Assessment of PPPs<br />
� Tajikistan Drafting a New<br />
Investment Law<br />
2
Crosscutting<br />
Themes<br />
Sub-National Technical Assistance:<br />
� Africa Regional Capacity Building Workshop on Revenue Management<br />
� Belize Improve Municipal Creditworthiness for Municipalities<br />
� Burkina Faso Strengthening Fiscal Revenues for the Municipality of Ouagadougou<br />
� Colombia Feasibility Study for Tradable Air Rights Instruments for Bus Rapid Transit Corridor<br />
� Ghana Increasing Access to Market-Based Financing for Municipalities in the Greater Accra Area<br />
� Indonesia Jakarta Credit Rating<br />
� Kenya Assessment of Geothermal Development Company for Enhanced Access to Finance<br />
� Lebanon Facilitating Sub-National Government Access to Commercial Credit and Capital Markets<br />
� Mauritania Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Study for the Communauté Urbaine de<br />
Nouakchott<br />
� Mexico Strengthening Lending Market for Small Municipalities<br />
� Philippines Assisting Tanuan City in Enhancing the City’s Creditworthiness<br />
� West Bank and Gaza Improving Municipal Revenue Generation Policies and Framework<br />
Fragile States * :<br />
� Burundi Pipeline Screening and Feasibility Assessment of PPPs in the Energy Sector<br />
� Comoros Options Evaluation and Strategic Roadmap for the Telecommunications Sector<br />
� Côte d’Ivoire Improving Users’ Awareness on Cost Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
� Côte d’Ivoire PPP Pipeline and Enabling Environment Support<br />
� Guinea-Bissau PPP Training Workshop<br />
� Guinea Mining Ancillary Infrastructure<br />
� Guinea PPP Training Workshop<br />
� Nepal Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of Potential PPP Projects<br />
� South Sudan Power Distribution System Diagnostic<br />
� West Bank and Gaza Solid Waste Management Project<br />
� Zimbabwe Assessment of Enabling Environment and PPP Pipeline<br />
Regional Integration:<br />
� Africa Legal Services in Support of the West African Power Pool’s Inter-connector Project for Côte<br />
d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea<br />
� Middle East and North Africa Developing Alternative Broadband Networks<br />
Capacity Building:<br />
� Africa Energy Ministers’ Conference<br />
� Africa Regional Conference on PPPs in Water and Sanitation<br />
� Gabon PPP Program<br />
� Leaders in Urban Transport Program<br />
� PPI Database Funding for FY12 and FY13<br />
� The Governance of Basic Local Public Services – 3 rd Global Report on Decentralization and Local<br />
Democracy<br />
� Middle East and North Africa Training Course on PPPs in the Water Sector<br />
� Rwanda Capacity Training for Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project<br />
� Sri Lanka Identifying PPP Opportunities for Local Governments<br />
* Several of the activities listed in the cross-cutting theme Fragile States appear among the three strategic pillars<br />
3
Activities Approved in Q1, Q2, and Q3 of Fiscal 2012<br />
The table below contains the activities approved during the first three quarters of fiscal 2012, classified in<br />
by region.<br />
Region Country/Title<br />
4<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Sector Nature of Activity<br />
AFR Africa: African Energy Ministers’ Conference $40,000 Energy Capacity Building<br />
AFR<br />
Africa: Legal Services in Support of the West African<br />
Power Pool’s Power Inter-connector Project<br />
AFR Africa: Lighting Africa Expansion $250,000 Energy<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
Africa: Regional Capacity Building Workshop with<br />
Agence Française de Développement on Revenue<br />
Management<br />
Africa: Regional Conference on PPPs in Water and<br />
Sanitation, Sub-Saharan Africa; Dakar, Senegal<br />
Burkina Faso: Strengthening of Fiscal Revenues for<br />
the Municipality of Ouagadougou<br />
Burundi: Project Pipeline Screening and Initial<br />
Feasibility Assessment of Potential Infrastructure<br />
PPPs in the Energy Sector<br />
$70,800 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />
$75,000<br />
Multisector<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Specific Performance<br />
Improvement<br />
$50,000 Water Emerging Best Practices<br />
$75,000<br />
Multisector<br />
AFR Cameroon: Support to the Cameroon Water Sector $40,000 Water<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
Comoros: Options Evaluation and Strategic Roadmap<br />
for the Telecommunications Sector of the Union of<br />
Comoros<br />
Côte d’Ivoire: Improving Users’ Awareness on Cost<br />
Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable Infrastructure Development $67,438<br />
Côte d’Ivoire: PPP Pipeline and Enabling Environment<br />
Support<br />
Financing<br />
$74,500 Energy Capacity Building<br />
$75,000 Telecom<br />
$74,640<br />
AFR Gabon: PPP Program in Gabon $74,640<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
Ghana: Increasing Access to Market-Based Financing<br />
for Municipalities in the Greater Accra Area<br />
Ghana: Institutional options for improving urban water<br />
supply in Ghana (phase 2)<br />
$175,000<br />
AFR Guinea-Bissau: PPP Training Workshop $49,963<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
$68,431 Water<br />
Multisector<br />
AFR Guinea: Mining Ancillary Infrastructure $490,000 Transport<br />
AFR Guinea: PPP Training Workshop $57,763<br />
AFR<br />
Kenya: Assessment of Geothermal Development<br />
Company for Enhanced Access to Finance<br />
Multisector<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms<br />
Financing<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms<br />
Capacity Building<br />
$46,750 Energy Financing<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies
Region Country/Title<br />
5<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Sector Nature of Activity<br />
AFR Kenya: Lake Turkana Wind Due Diligence Project $294,900 Energy Capacity Building<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
Lesotho: Legal Advisory Support to ICT and Facilities<br />
Management PPP<br />
Mali: Capacity Building Support to Scatec and Kenie<br />
Projects<br />
Mali: Improving Governance and accountability to<br />
Foster an Enabling Environment for Private Sector<br />
Participation in the Electricity and Water Sectors<br />
Mali: Legal Advisory to the Government of Mali for the<br />
Scatec Solar Project<br />
Mauritania: PEFA Study for the Communauté Urbaine<br />
de Nouakchott<br />
Mozambique: Preparation of a Gas Sector Master<br />
Plan<br />
Niger: Evaluation of projects with private participation<br />
for Electricity Production and Supply of Energy<br />
Services in Rural Areas<br />
Nigeria: Support for Private Development of the<br />
Power Sector<br />
$301,160 Telecom Pioneering Transactions<br />
$49,890 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />
$74,890<br />
Multisector<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms<br />
$49,950 Energy Capacity Building<br />
$147,995<br />
$250,000<br />
$60,000<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
Specific Performance<br />
Improvement<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
$402,500 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />
AFR Nigeria: Workshop on Water Utility Reform $32,450 Water Capacity Building<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
AFR<br />
Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project—Technical<br />
Assistance and Capacity Training<br />
South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling<br />
Program in the City of Johannesburg<br />
South Sudan: Diagnostic of Power Distribution<br />
System<br />
Zimbabwe: Assessment of PPP Enabling<br />
Environment and PPP Pipeline<br />
$207,700 Water Capacity Building<br />
$74,820<br />
Multi-<br />
Sector<br />
$75,000 Energy<br />
$53,000<br />
EAP Indonesia: Jakarta Credit Rating $75,000<br />
EAP<br />
EAP<br />
EAP<br />
EAP<br />
EAP<br />
Laos: Transport Sector Enabling Environment<br />
Assessment and Pipeline Screening<br />
Philippines: Assisting Tanuan City in Enhancing the<br />
City’s Creditworthiness<br />
Philippines: Options to Expand Private Sector<br />
Participation in the Development of the Irrigation<br />
Sector<br />
Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the<br />
Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID System for the<br />
Delivery of Public Services<br />
Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-<br />
Based Contracts for Road Maintenance in Vietnam<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
$50,000 Transport<br />
$75,000<br />
Multisector<br />
$100,000 Water<br />
Pioneering Transactions<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Credit Rating<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Specific Performance<br />
Improvement<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
$230,620 Telecom Emerging Best Practice<br />
$40,000 Transport<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies
Region Country/Title<br />
ECA<br />
ECA<br />
ECA<br />
ECA<br />
ECA<br />
ECA<br />
Global<br />
Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica<br />
2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower Plants<br />
Albania: Universal Access and Service Policy<br />
Framework in the ICT Sector<br />
Armenia: Advisory Support for Private Sector<br />
Involvement in Operation of Regional Bus Stations<br />
Armenia: Support to the Armenia Water and<br />
Sewerage Company with the Design of the Enhanced<br />
Management Contract for 2011–2013<br />
Moldova: Feasibility Study for Cloud-Based Shared<br />
Infrastructure PPP<br />
Tajikistan: Drafting a new Investment Law in<br />
Tajikistan<br />
Global: Leaders in Urban Transport Program –<br />
Translation and Workshop Delivery<br />
6<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
Sector Nature of Activity<br />
$75,000 Energy Pioneering Transactions<br />
$148,100 Telecom<br />
$75,000 Transport<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
$75,000 Water Pioneering Transaction<br />
$200,000 Telecom<br />
$200,000<br />
Multisector<br />
Global Global: PPI Database Funding for FY12 and FY13 $658,000 Multisector<br />
Global<br />
LAC<br />
LAC<br />
LAC<br />
LAC<br />
LAC<br />
LAC<br />
Global: The Governance of Basic Local Public<br />
Services – 3 rd Global Report on Decentralization and<br />
Local Democracy (GOLD III)<br />
Belize: Improve Municipal Creditworthiness for Belize<br />
Municipalities<br />
Brazil: Improving the Sustainable Forestry<br />
Concession Model in the Amazon<br />
Colombia: Feasibility Study to Develop Tradable Air<br />
Rights Instruments to Mobilize Private Financing for<br />
Bogotá’s Carrera 7 Bus Rapid Transit Corridor<br />
Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income<br />
Housing Projects<br />
Mexico: Strengthening Lending Market for Small<br />
Mexican Municipalities<br />
Panama: Preparation of a Performance-Based<br />
Efficiency Improvement Contract for IDAAN’s Colón<br />
Business Unit<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms<br />
$75,000 Transport Capacity Building<br />
$200,000<br />
$75,000<br />
$400,000<br />
$179,780<br />
$74,800<br />
$75,000<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
LAC Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure $75,000 Water<br />
LAC<br />
Uruguay: Development of Financing Options for PPPs<br />
in Roads Sector<br />
Consensus Building<br />
Consensus Building<br />
Specific Performance<br />
Improvement<br />
Pioneering Transactions<br />
Other<br />
Pioneering Transactions<br />
Other<br />
$74,975 Water Pioneering Transactions<br />
$250,000 Transport<br />
MENA Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment $459,275 Energy<br />
MENA<br />
MENA<br />
Djibouti: Feasibility Assessment for Solar Rural<br />
Electrification<br />
Djibouti: Options for Telecoms Sector Liberalization in<br />
Djibouti<br />
$400,600 Energy<br />
$107,690 Telecom<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms
Region Country/Title<br />
MENA<br />
MENA<br />
MENA<br />
MENA<br />
MENA<br />
MENA<br />
SAR<br />
Lebanon: Facilitating Sub-National Government<br />
Access to Commercial Credit and Capital Markets<br />
Lebanon: Improving the Performance of the Beka’a<br />
regional Water Authority<br />
Middle East and North Africa: Developing Alternative<br />
Broadband Networks<br />
Middle East and North Africa: Training Course on<br />
PPPs in the Water Sector<br />
West Bank and Gaza: Improving Municipal Revenue<br />
Generation Policies and Framework<br />
West Bank and Gaza: Southern West Bank Solid<br />
Waste Management Project<br />
Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure<br />
Projects Under a PPP Model<br />
7<br />
Approved<br />
Funding<br />
$75,000<br />
Sector Nature of Activity<br />
Multisector<br />
$75,000 Water<br />
$74,510 Telecom<br />
Capacity Building<br />
Specific Performance<br />
Improvement<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
$50,000 Water Building Capacity<br />
$161,300<br />
Multisector<br />
Specific Performance<br />
Improvement<br />
$199,975 Water Pioneering Transactions<br />
$64,450<br />
Multisector<br />
SAR Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap $75,000 Telecom<br />
SAR India: Assistance in Finalization of a PPP Policy $75,000<br />
SAR<br />
SAR<br />
SAR<br />
SAR<br />
Maldives: Contract Management Support for Solid<br />
Waste Management PPP<br />
Nepal: Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of<br />
Potential Public-Private Infrastructure Projects<br />
Sri Lanka: Identifying PPP Opportunities for Local<br />
Governments<br />
Sri Lanka: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure<br />
Projects Under a PPP Model<br />
Multisector<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms<br />
Policy, Regulatory, and<br />
Institutional Reforms<br />
$74,950 Water Capacity Building<br />
$50,000<br />
$75,000<br />
$75,000<br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector <br />
Multisector<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development Strategies<br />
Other<br />
Capacity Building
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
REGIONAL UPDATE<br />
PPIAF’S WORK IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA<br />
April 2012<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)’s economies have improved markedly over the past decade.<br />
The continent’s real GDP grew by roughly 5% per year from 2000 to 2008, reaching<br />
$1.56 trillion in 2008 prior to the financial crisis, at a similar level to the GDP of China.<br />
Although the financial crisis slowed the economic boom, SSA has showed significant<br />
resilience, and economic growth climbed back to 5% in 2011. This growth story has<br />
been built on sound macro-economic principles that have reduced inflation from the<br />
highs of the 1990s, brought about tax reforms and the privatization of state assets, and<br />
energized the market through private-sector friendly policies and sector strategies.<br />
Nevertheless, many SSA countries continue to face serious infrastructure deficits that<br />
negatively impact economic growth across the continent. As a result, many of the<br />
region’s governments are recognizing that mobilizing the required investment to<br />
support the development of infrastructure will be a major challenge. To address<br />
this, governments are looking to engage the private sector through public-private<br />
partnership (PPP) arrangements to close the gaps in investment capital, technology,<br />
and know-how needed to improve the efficiency and delivery of public infrastructure<br />
services. Requests for PPIAF assistance in the region continue to be high, as governments<br />
seek support to help develop the appropriate enabling environment for private sector<br />
participation, as well as the knowledge and expertise to develop and implement<br />
bankable PPP projects.<br />
As of March 31, 2012 PPIAF had provided $72,596,855 in funding to 333 projects in<br />
SSA, representing 35% of PPIAF’s total funding portfolio. The region continues to<br />
be the largest recipient of PPIAF assistance, and in fiscal 2012 activities in SSA have<br />
represented 41% of the total portfolio. Since inception, the most frequent recipients<br />
of PPIAF assistance have been Kenya, Mozambique, and Nigeria. While support to<br />
these countries will continue, the portfolio is also diversifying to support fragile and<br />
conflict-affected countries such as Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and South<br />
Sudan. On a sectoral basis, energy activities represent 55% of PPIAF’s ongoing portfolio<br />
in the region, followed by 17% for multi-sector activities, and 12% for water sector<br />
activities.
It is estimated that inadequate infrastructure across SSA is slowing GDP growth by around 2%. Governments in the<br />
region face a serious challenge of increasing the quality and quantity of infrastructure service provision to sustain and<br />
enhance economic growth rates in the context of narrow fi scal space to fund these investments. A sizeable funding<br />
gap exists, which governments and donors are unable to fi ll alone. The PPIAF-sponsored African Infrastructure<br />
Country Diagnostic found that the continent needs to spend about $93 billion per year over the next ten years, 15%<br />
of the region’s GDP, to plug the infrastructure gap. The report also estimated current spending at only $45 billion a<br />
year, demonstrating the size of the funding gap. For this reason, PPIAF assistance has been highly requested to help<br />
governments leverage private sector management expertise and/or fi nancing to expand and improve infrastructure<br />
services.<br />
As is often noted, the infrastructure gap is most acute in the power sector, where chronic power shortages in many<br />
of the region’s countries signifi cantly impact economic activity and growth. Although the sector is already the second<br />
largest recipient of private sector investment across the continent, it is estimated that SSA spends only around one<br />
quarter of the amount needed to fulfi ll demand. Thus the power generation capacity of the entire continent, populated<br />
by 800 million people, is comparable with that of Spain, with a population of only 45 million.<br />
Clearly the private sector will play a signifi cant role in building Africa’s power generation potential, and PPIAF has<br />
provided support to several projects in the region with this goal in mind. In Nigeria, PPIAF approved an activity that<br />
will support the government in reaching its Vision 2020 goal of increasing the country’s generation capacity from<br />
3,000 MW to 40,000 MW by 2020 by facilitating private sector investment in Independent Power Producers (IPPs).<br />
PPIAF is supporting the due diligence of proposed IPPs to ensure that the projects meet internationally established<br />
benchmarks for proposed technology and cost effi ciency. It is hoped that the IPPs that will be examined as part of<br />
the activity will provide additional generation capacity of more than 2,500 MW. Similarly, in Kenya PPIAF is providing<br />
technical, commercial, legal, and fi nancial expertise to the Kenya Power Company to support the development of<br />
the €600 million Lake Turkana Wind Project, including the negotiation of the Power Purchase Agreement with the<br />
private operator. When completed the 300 MW Lake Turkana wind power generation facility is expected to represent<br />
17% of Kenya’s installed capacity.<br />
Several countries in Africa are rich in natural resources, and as these countries attempt to embark into a sustainable<br />
development path, a key question arises of how to integrate the infrastructure assets (e.g., roads and power) created<br />
to serve mining companies into the policies and plans that aim to improve the provision of infrastructure nation-wide.<br />
In recognizing the increasing importance of this question for African countries, PPIAF is supporting the government<br />
of Guinea in its efforts to integrate its mining ancillary infrastructure into the relevant national development plans.<br />
Across infrastructure sectors, private sector investors in SSA are looking to implement PPP projects that provide suitable<br />
returns for the risks undertaken. These investors have sometimes complained of the lack of bankable deals in the<br />
region, which has made it diffi cult to invest funds appropriately. In fi scal 2012 PPIAF has approved multiple projects<br />
that seek to respond to this challenge by promoting the identifi cation and prioritization of potential PPP projects. In<br />
Burundi, Côte d’Ivoire, Gabon, Niger, and Zimbabwe PPIAF is providing support to screen and examine infrastructure<br />
projects for their suitability to be structured as PPPs. In doing so, PPIAF is helping these governments prioritize fi rstmover<br />
projects and signal to potential investors their government commitment to developing a multi-project PPP
Ethiopia: Solid Waste Management<br />
PPIAF Funding: $391,500<br />
Background: In 2002 municipal solid waste management (SWM) was<br />
in a poor state in Ethiopia, and the absence of an appropriate policy and<br />
regulatory environment continued to inhibit private sector participation<br />
(PSP). SWM had not been a national priority, and investments were<br />
minimal; poor waste collection and disposal practices had signifi cant<br />
environmental and health impacts. There was no formal structure<br />
for charging waste generators, and weak fi nancial and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y<br />
systems were one of the major sources of poor waste management<br />
performance. PSP in SWM was limited to informal pre-collection<br />
companies in Addis Ababa and a few other cities. Moreover, there was<br />
virtually no capacity within government to develop appropriate SWM<br />
contracts and carry out the tendering and evaluation process for PSP.<br />
PPIAF’s Contribution: Although government interest in PSP in the solid waste sector was growing, it was<br />
essential that the necessary framework for PSP be developed before contracts were tendered and the private<br />
sector became formally engaged in SWM operations. In late 2002 the government of Ethiopia sought PPIAF<br />
support in the solid waste sector. PPIAF supported: 1) a diagnostic of the solid waste sector in the country;<br />
2) an assessment of the legal and institutional changes required for greater PSP; 3) an assessment of the PSP<br />
opportunities and options available to the Environmental Protection Agency; 4) recommendations on policy,<br />
institutional reforms, strategy, and applicable laws necessary for greater PSP; and 5) capacity building training<br />
through courses on fi nance and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y options in the SWM sector, workshops with relevant stakeholders,<br />
and two study tours to South Africa and Egypt.<br />
Outcomes: The PPIAF activity built the technical capacity of municipality staff to understand the principles<br />
of private fi nancing, operation, and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y in the sector, which was crucial for the supervision and<br />
monitoring of the tendering and implementation of PSP. Subsequently the Environmental Protection Agency<br />
began a full review of the national SWM strategy, to incorporate the policy provisions for PSP generated by<br />
the PPIAF-funded study. As a result, in February 2007 the President passed the Solid Waste Management<br />
Proclamation No. 513/2007, which allowed private operators to obtain a permit to engage in the collection,<br />
transportation, and use or disposal of waste.<br />
In May 2007 the Agence Française de Développement approved funding of €5.4 million, out of total project<br />
costs of €27.76 million, for the construction of four transfer stations in Addis Ababa. In May 2008 the World<br />
Bank approved a $145 million loan to support SWM and provide assistance for urban local governments<br />
interested in entering into service contracts with private enterprises for the collection of solid waste.<br />
Impacts: Following the 2007 proclamation, the Municipality of Addis Ababa, with 3 million residents, was<br />
divided into 549 collection zones with one private enterprise assigned to each zone. Service charges for waste<br />
collection are collected as part of water consumption rates, and payment is on a volume-based rate of 30 birr<br />
(around $1.75) per m 3 of waste collected. Thus far 524 enterprises have obtained permits to perform primary<br />
collection of solid waste in Addis Ababa, employing a total of 5,815 waste collectors. Consequently, the<br />
garbage collection rate has increased from 60% to 80%, and an additional 600,000 residents in Addis Ababa<br />
now have their waste collected.
program. It is hoped that PPIAF can provide second-phase support to the projects identifi ed for more in depth<br />
pre-feasibility studies and project appraisal. In addition, many of these projects also include a component that assesses<br />
the enabling environment for PPPs in general, and for the identifi ed projects in particular. In doing so, the activities<br />
are designed to quickly fl ag legislative and regulatory impediments that need to be addressed before a project can<br />
be launched.<br />
Expanding access and improving services in Africa will need private sector involvement, but given the magnitude of<br />
the challenges it will continue to require an active participation of the public sector. This is why PPIAF, through its Sub-<br />
National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program also supports the efforts of municipalities responsible for the provision<br />
of public services, as well as autonomous public utilities, to improve their fi nancial and operational performance and<br />
their capacity to access fi nancing in commercial and quasi-commercial terms. In fi scal 2012, the SNTA program has<br />
approved activities in Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Mauritania to improve the fi nancial performance of municipalities in<br />
those countries, and has also supported an Africa-wide capacity building workshop on revenue management, which<br />
was co-fi nanced by the Agence Française de Développement’s Center for Financial, Economic, and Banking Studies.<br />
SNTA has also approved an activity in Kenya that supports an assessment of the Geothermal Development Company<br />
to enhance its access to fi nance.<br />
PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />
• Africa: African Energy Ministers’ Conference, approved August 23, 2011, $40,000<br />
• Africa: Legal Services in Support of the West African Power Pool’s Power Inter-connector Project for Côte<br />
d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea, approved February 28, 2012, $70,800<br />
• Africa: Lighting Africa Expansion, approved December 5, 2011, $250,000<br />
• Africa (SNTA): Regional Capacity Building Workshop with Agence Française de Développement on Revenue<br />
Management, approved March 4, 2012, $75,000<br />
• Africa: Regional Conference on PPPs in Water and Sanitation in SSA, approved March 26, 2012, $50,000<br />
• Burkina Faso (SNTA): Strengthening of Fiscal Revenues for the Municipality of Ouagadougou, approved<br />
March 19, 2012 $75,000<br />
• Burundi: Project Pipeline Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of Potential Infrastructure PPPs in the<br />
Energy Sector, approved January 31, 2012, $74,500<br />
• Cameroon: Support to the Water Sector, approved February 15, 2012, $40,000<br />
• Comoros: Options Evaluation and Strategic Roadmap for the Telecommunications Sector, approved December<br />
22, 2011, $75,000<br />
• Côte d’Ivoire: Improving Users’ Awareness on Cost Re<strong>cover</strong>y for Sustainable Infrastructure Development—<br />
Phase II, approved December 6, 2011, $67,438<br />
• Côte d’Ivoire: PPP Pipeline and Enabling Environment Support, approved October 16, 2011, $74,640<br />
• Gabon: PPP Program, approved February 7, 2012, $74,640<br />
• Ghana (SNTA): Increasing Access to Market-Based Financing for Municipalities in the Greater Accra Area,<br />
approved November 18, 2011, $175,000
PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)... Continued<br />
• Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water Supply—Phase II, approved March 11, 2012, $68,431<br />
• Guinea-Bissau: PPP Training Workshop, approved October 16, 2011, $49,963<br />
• Guinea: Mining Ancillary Infrastructure, approved January 10, 2012, $490,000<br />
• Guinea: PPP Training Workshop, approved October 30, 2011, $57,763<br />
• Kenya (SNTA): Assessment of Geothermal Development Company for Enhanced Access to Finance, approved<br />
September 28, 2011, $46,750<br />
• Kenya: Lake Turkana Wind Due Diligence Project, approved November 30, 2011, $294,900<br />
• Lesotho: Legal Advisory Support to ICT and Facilities Management PPP, approved December 16, 2011,<br />
$301,160<br />
• Mali: Capacity Building Support to the Scatec and Kenie Projects, approved December 5, 2011, $49,890<br />
• Mali: Improving Governance and Accountability to Foster an Enabling Environment for Private Sector Participa<br />
tion in the Electricity and Water Sectors, approved July 24, 2011, $74,890<br />
• Mali: Legal Advisory to the Government of Mali for the Scatec Solar Project, approved November 11, 2011,<br />
$49,950<br />
• Mauritania (SNTA): PEFA Study for the Communauté Urbaine de Nouakchott, approved October 30, 2011,<br />
$147,995<br />
• Mozambique: Preparation of a Gas Sector Master Plan, approved September 14, 2011, $250,000<br />
• Niger: Evaluation of Projects with Private Participation for Production and Supply of Electricity in Rural Areas,<br />
approved March 11, 2011, $60,000<br />
• Nigeria: Support for Private Development of the Power Sector, approved December 2, 2011, $402,500<br />
• Nigeria: Workshop on Water Utility Reform, approved December 2, 2011, $32,450<br />
• Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project—Technical Assistance and Capacity Training, approved November 1,<br />
2011, $207,700<br />
• South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg, approved March 20,<br />
2012, $74,820<br />
• South Sudan: Diagnostic of Power Distribution System, approved December 14, 2011, $75,000<br />
PPIAF has supported activities in: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape<br />
Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia,<br />
Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali,<br />
Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Rwanda, São Tomé and Princípe,<br />
Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, and Zambia
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
REGIONAL UPDATE<br />
PPIAF’S WORK IN EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC<br />
April 2012<br />
The growth of economies in the East Asia and the Pacific (EAP) region remains strong<br />
but constrained by weakening external demand due to the sluggish U.S. economy,<br />
uncertainties in the eurozone, and the impact of natural disasters (such as the tsunami<br />
in Japan and flooding in several countries) in the production supply chain. The slow<br />
global growth, however, presents an opportunity to enhance medium- to long-term<br />
growth by increasing investment in infrastructure (particularly in those sectors that<br />
support production) and increasing the quality and efficiency of these investments.<br />
The private sector can play a role in financing and improving the delivery of productive<br />
infrastructure. PPIAF assistance in the region continues to be centered on building a<br />
robust pipeline of public-private partnership (PPP) projects and improving enabling<br />
environments for private sector financing.<br />
Since inception PPIAF has approved $32,278,827 in funding to 151 projects in the<br />
EAP region, representing 15% of PPIAF’s total funding portfolio. Projects have been<br />
concentrated in the largest countries in terms of economies and population: China,<br />
Indonesia, Philippines, and Vietnam. These four countries account for 60% of all<br />
funding in the region. Multi-sector activities dominate and represent 32% of PPIAF’s<br />
funding portfolio, followed by 23% in energy and 18% in water. PPIAF has activities in<br />
over 11 countries with a current portfolio of 14 ongoing activities.<br />
In recent months, PPIAF supported four activities that will help governments determine<br />
the potential for private sector participation in roads in Lao PDR and Vietnam, irrigation<br />
in the Philippines, and a nationwide e-ID system in Vietnam. PPIAF also approved two<br />
Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) activities to support the credit rating of<br />
Jakarta, Indonesia in preparation for a bond issuance and improve the creditworthiness<br />
of Tanuan City in the Philippines.<br />
Recent PPIAF assistance in the region focused on developing a pipeline of PPPs particularly in the<br />
roads, irrigation, and ICT sectors. Lao PDR is positioning itself as a “land-linked” country for regional<br />
trade, and is looking at PPPs as an innovative way of fi nancing future infrastructure investment. A<br />
PPIAF activity is supporting the government of Lao PDR in conducting the preliminary assessment<br />
of the enabling environment for PPPs in the transport sector and the country’s potential PPP pipeline.<br />
The activity will serve as an input to the Lao National Strategy for the Transport Sector. In the<br />
Philippines, PPP arrangements are relatively new in the agriculture sector, and the Department of<br />
Agriculture requested support to address the enabling environment for PPPs and build its capacity<br />
to implement its PPP program. PPIAF is currently providing assistance to the to the Department<br />
to identify policy, regulatory, and institutional constraints in the sector, in addition to a pipeline<br />
of bankable projects. Another PPIAF activity is providing assistance to determine options in the
design and execution of a PPP e-ID system in Vietnam. The deployment of e-ID systems helps increase effi ciency and<br />
transparency of public service delivery to citizens. The private sector’s role in deploying this e-ID infrastructure is critical,<br />
because it can potentially ensure the fi nancial viability and sustainability of the project.<br />
Strengthening private sector engagement is also important, particularly in countries where the PPP model has<br />
been gaining support. In Vietnam, for example, the Ministry of Transport—through the Directorate of Roads<br />
Vietnam—is taking the lead in setting a strategic vision for the national road system, which will include the use of<br />
performance-based contracts in road maintenance. PPIAF is helping to undertake a review of the current approach<br />
to performance-based road maintenance contracting in Vietnam and providing recommendations to improve its<br />
implementation.<br />
Two SNTA activities were approved in recent months to assist local government units access market-based fi nancing<br />
to support priority projects that will help them cope with the challenges of rapid urbanization and climate change.<br />
The fi rst activity will support a credit rating and fi nancial management assessment of the Province of Jakarta and the<br />
strengthening of its newly established Debt Management Unit in assessing and monitoring debt. The Province of<br />
Jakarta is keen on issuing a bond in July 2012, which will potentially be the fi rst municipal bond issuance for Indonesia.<br />
The other SNTA activity is helping the City of Tanuan in the Philippines improve its capacity for fi scal and fi nancial<br />
management as it considers a local currency loan from the International Finance Corporation to fi nance its capital<br />
expenditure program for essential infrastructure. The planned transaction will be different from earlier borrowing by<br />
the city, as this will not involve traditional inter-governmental transfers (block grants from the national government<br />
to local governments) as security.<br />
Looking forward, PPIAF assistance in EAP will continue in the region’s larger economies, but focusing on the least<br />
developed economies remains a strategic priority. To date, potential activities in the energy sector in Papua New<br />
Guinea and telecommunications sector in Myanmar are being explored. Developing a pipeline for PPIAF’s SNTA<br />
window will also be a priority starting with follow-up support to local governments that benefi tted from initial activities<br />
under the SNTA assistance (see box below).
Indonesia: Support for Financial and Credit Rating Assessment for Sub-National<br />
Governments<br />
PPIAF Funding: $330,000<br />
Background: About a decade ago, Indonesia implemented a<br />
sweeping decentralization reform, which made empowering local<br />
governments critical. To help increase the level and quality of<br />
local spending for public services and infrastructure, Indonesia<br />
embarked on developing a framework for sub-national borrowing,<br />
in particular on issuing municipal bonds. In this context, the<br />
Ministry of Finance sought guidance from the World Bank on<br />
setting up a system for fi nancial assessment and credit ratings,<br />
and assisting sub-national governments in attaining credit ratings<br />
and issuing of bonds.<br />
PPIAF’s Contribution: As part of the overall work to support the Ministry of Finance in developing a framework<br />
for sub-national borrowing, PPIAF’s SNTA program supported fi nancial management assessments and credit<br />
ratings for four cities: Surabaya, Makassar, Bandung, and Balikpapan.<br />
Outcomes: In 2011 the fi nancial management assessments and credit ratings were completed for the four<br />
cities. The assessments for Surabaya and Bandung were done by Standard & Poor’s, while those for Makassar<br />
and Balikpapan were done by PEFINDO, a local rating agency. A workshop was conducted on November 21,<br />
2011 in Jakarta to present the results of the assessments and credit rating reports, discuss the legal background<br />
of sub-national borrowing (Government Regulation 30/2011), share international experiences with sub-national<br />
borrowing, and share the experience of DKI Jakarta in preparing for the issuance of Indonesia’s fi rst municipal<br />
bond. The results of the fi nancial management assessments and credit ratings for the participating cities were<br />
very encouraging, and the cities also found the inputs from these reports to be benefi cial to improve their fi scal<br />
management practices. Follow-up support to Makassar and Surabaya to help them move towards accessing<br />
market-based fi nancing is currently being explored.<br />
PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />
• Indonesia (SNTA): Jakarta Credit Rating, approved February 19, 2012, $75,000<br />
• Laos: Transport Sector Enabling Environment Assessment and Pipeline Screening, approved December 21,<br />
2011, $50,000<br />
• Philippines (SNTA): Assisting Tanuan City in Enhancing the City’s Creditworthiness, approved March 20,<br />
2012, $75,000<br />
• Philippines: Options to Expand Private Sector Participation in the Development of the Irrigation Sector,<br />
approved March 20, 2012, $100,000<br />
• Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID System for the<br />
Delivery of Public Services, approved March 29, 2012, $230,620<br />
• Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-Based Contracts for Road Maintenance, approved October<br />
17, 2011, $40,000<br />
PPIAF has supported activities in: Cambodia, China, East Timor, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Mongolia, Papua<br />
New Guinea, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Thailand, Vanuatu, and Vietnam
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
REGIONAL UPDATE<br />
April 2012<br />
PPIAF’S WORK IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA<br />
The global financial crisis that began in late 2008 set back ambitious infrastructure<br />
development plans for many countries in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ECA)<br />
region. Many such plans relied on public-private partnership (PPP) arrangements. The<br />
flight to quality projects and countries perceived as less risky has been notable. Across<br />
the region, each project structure exhibited unique risks, but since the crisis, increased<br />
complexity and longer times between contract signature and financial close have been<br />
common.<br />
Since inception PPIAF and its Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program have<br />
provided $26,145,155 in funding to 119 projects in the ECA region, representing 12%<br />
of PPIAF’s total portfolio. Armenia dominates the regional portfolio with 15 projects<br />
worth $3.6 million approved since inception. Ukraine, with eight activities, has the<br />
next highest number of activities, followed by Croatia, with six activities, Bosnia and<br />
Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Turkey, with five activities each. Energy and<br />
multi-sector activities represent 35% and 19% respectively of PPIAF’s portfolio in the<br />
region.<br />
In recent months, PPIAF approved one activity in Albania to provide technical assessments<br />
for three hydropower transactions; another activity in Albania to improve universal<br />
access and service policy framework in the ICT sector; one activity in Armenia supporting<br />
private sector involvement in the operation of regional bus stations; another activity<br />
in Armenia assisting the Armenia Water and Sewerage Company with the design of<br />
the enhanced management contract for 2011–2013; one activity in Moldova to assess<br />
the feasibility of a cloud-based ICT PPP scheme; and one activity in Tajikistan to draft<br />
a new investment law.<br />
The ECA region has seen investment in infrastructure projects with private participation grow by<br />
80%, emerging as a leader among other developing regions. However, the fi nancial crisis has had<br />
an adverse impact on private sector funding fl ows: investment levels have since dropped signifi cantly<br />
lower than in previous years, and have dropped at a much higher rate than that in other developing<br />
regions.<br />
Nevertheless, as of 2011 the city of St. Petersburg had closed fi ve signifi cant PPP projects, including<br />
the €1.5 billion Moscow–St. Petersburg Highway and the €1 billion Pulkoyo Airport Development<br />
project. Another area of growth in PPP project development was in renewable energy. Largely thanks<br />
to effective policy support, 2011 also saw signifi cant growth in PPPs in renewable energy projects;<br />
Bulgaria and Romania PPP deals closed in this sector with values of $370 million and $1.3 billion,<br />
respectively. These projects demonstrate sectoral and regional pockets of appetite for PPPs in ECA<br />
as the global fi nancial crisis lessens in intensity.
Albania: Technical Assistance for the Transport Sector<br />
PPIAF Funding: $245,000<br />
Background: In 2005 Albania’s road infrastructure was<br />
inadequate, as about 63% of the national road network<br />
was in poor condition, and the sector was in need of major<br />
investment. However, given the huge investment needs, the<br />
government realized that it could not achieve the targets laid<br />
out in its National Transport Plan using only government and/<br />
or donor funds. The government was therefore interested<br />
in exploring private participation options to support its road<br />
infrastructure development goals. In 2005 the government<br />
requested PPIAF support to provide a road map for private<br />
participation in the road sector, by identifying obstacles to PPPs<br />
and recommendations to increase private sector interest.<br />
PPIAF’s Contribution: The PPIAF-funded framework report was compiled within the context of huge investment<br />
needs in the roads sector in Albania. In assessing available PPP structures, the report assessed build-operatetransfer,<br />
rehabilitate-operate-transfer, and maintain-operate-transfer as the best available options to maximize<br />
private participation for high priority investments in the sector. The report noted that with low traffi c volumes,<br />
weak local fi nancial markets, and inexperience with tolling, the government’s objective of large-scale private<br />
sector investment in roads would be a longer-term objective.<br />
A one-day training session on PPPs in the roads sector was held, and the report’s recommendations were<br />
presented at a two-day workshop in May 2007. Consensus was achieved on moving forward with the design<br />
of performance-based road maintenance contracts for Albanian roads.<br />
Outcomes: Following on from the recommendations of the PPIAF activity, a World Bank project was launched<br />
to support the piloting of four performance-based maintenance contracts in the Tirana and Kukës regions.<br />
The three-year contracts were subsequently awarded in October 2009. The total cost of these contracts was<br />
$10 million, with the fi rst two years paid by the World Bank, and the third year fi nanced by the government<br />
of Albania. Since the beginning of the contracts, the contractors have improved their overall performance and<br />
built their capacity in the performance-based maintenance approach. As a result, it is likely that the approach<br />
will be scaled-up in other regions within Albania.<br />
In addition, enabling legislation was passed in October 2009 to transform the General Roads Directorate<br />
into the Albanian Road Authority, which is responsible for national and regional roads. The Albanian Road<br />
Authority Board was appointed in September 2010, and the authority will benefi t from autonomy and greater<br />
responsibility for overseeing the roads sector in Albania, as recommended in the PPIAF-funded report.<br />
Finally, the government of Albania has recently decided to introduce a tolling system on the Durres–Kukës<br />
highway. It will be the fi rst highway to charge tolls to <strong>cover</strong> maintenance costs, and the government intends<br />
to introduce tolls to other highways currently under construction. The Durres–Kukës highway was constructed<br />
in 2007–2010 to connect Kosovo with the Albanian seaport of Durres. As of February 2012, fi ve international<br />
consortia have submitted bids to upgrade, operate, and maintain the new Durres–Kukës highway. The lead<br />
fi nancial advisor on the project is the International Finance Corporation PPP Transaction Advisory team.
PPIAF support to ECA has shifted its focus from the Balkan states to a broader pool of countries, including Tajikistan.<br />
With respect to the scope of PPIAF-funded activities, the focus has shifted from regional initiatives to single-country<br />
activities, often supporting specifi c PPP transactions. While PPIAF continues to support the development of a wholesale<br />
electricity market in Southeastern Europe in order to achieve greater economies of scale, the large majority of<br />
new activities provide just-in-time interventions strengthening client countries’ capacity to successfully close selected<br />
PPP schemes (i.e., in Albania, Armenia, and Moldova).<br />
Particularly noteworthy is the realization in Moldova of a feasibility study for a PPP on the development of a “cloud”<br />
computing-based data center. This activity will create a set of reference documents that can be later reused by other<br />
countries interested in building cloud-based shared e-government infrastructure leveraging PPPs.<br />
PPIAF responded quickly and provided assistance in fi scal 2012 to meet the needs resulting from the fi nancial crisis.<br />
In Albania, PPIAF is assisting the government to further liberalize the energy sector, enhance private sector participation,<br />
and monetize the value of its generation assets.<br />
PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />
• Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower Plants, approved<br />
December 15, 2011, $75,000<br />
• Albania: Universal Access and Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector, approved November 26, 2011,<br />
$148,100<br />
• Armenia: Advisory Support for Private Sector Involvement in Operation of Regional Bus Station, approved<br />
September 15, 2011, $75,000<br />
• Armenia: Support to the Armenia Water and Sewerage Company with the Design of the Enhanced<br />
Management Contract for 2011–2013, approved July 15, 2011, $75,000<br />
• Moldova: Feasibility Study for Cloud-Based Shared Infrastructure PPP, approved January 15, 2012, $200,000<br />
• Tajikistan: Drafting a New Investment Law in Tajikistan, approved September 27, 2011, $200,000<br />
PPIAF has supported activities in: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina,<br />
Bulgaria, Croatia, Federal Republic of Serbia and Montenegro, Georgia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kosovo,<br />
Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia,<br />
Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
REGIONAL UPDATE<br />
April 2012<br />
PPIAF’S WORK IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN<br />
Latin America has the most unequal income distribution in the world as well as high<br />
rates of extreme poverty.<br />
Since inception PPIAF has provided $24,780,304 in funding to 122 projects in the Latin<br />
America and Caribbean (LAC) region, representing 12% of PPIAF’s total portfolio.<br />
Brazil leads with the most funding received ($3.1 million) for 15 activities, but is closely<br />
followed by Colombia with 17 projects worth $2.9 million and Peru with 12 activities<br />
worth $2.9 million. Twenty-six region-wide activities worth $4.7 million have also been<br />
approved since inception. Multi-sector activities represent 39% of PPIAF’s portfolio in<br />
the region, followed by 21% in transport and 18% in water and sanitation.<br />
In recent months, PPIAF has approved one activity in Uruguay to provide transaction<br />
assistance with the review of existing road projects, assess their overall bankability,<br />
and identify financial instruments for the public-private partnership (PPP) structure.<br />
Another significant activity recently funded by PPIAF seeks to improve the forestry<br />
concession model in the Amazon, one of the first concessions of sustainable forestry<br />
management concessions carried out by the Brazilian Forest Service. On the subnational<br />
side, one noteworthy activity recently approved through PPIAF’s Sub-National<br />
Technical Assistance (SNTA) program supports the feasibility study for the development<br />
of tradable air rights instruments to mobilize private financing in Bogotá, Colombia.<br />
The LAC region has consistently led the way in terms of private participation in infrastructure. At the<br />
beginning of the 1990s, all developing countries in the region suffered from large infrastructure defi -<br />
cits, dismal service standards, tight fi scal constraints, and deep problems with the traditional mode<br />
of public infrastructure service delivery. There were weak incentives for effi ciency and infrastructure<br />
delivery was often embedded within patronage-drive political systems. In most of these countries,<br />
the decline in public fi nance was larger than the increase. The exception was Colombia, where the<br />
decline was slight and, on average, public investment levels remained roughly unchanged (albeit<br />
with major fl uctuations) throughout the period.<br />
In recent years, however, privatization has slowed dramatically in the region. Disparities in LAC are<br />
also refl ected by the different maturity levels of private participation in infrastructure markets across<br />
the region. Numerous countries in the region are moving towards a second phase of programs for<br />
private participation in infrastructure—mostly through PPP schemes—while other countries are just<br />
beginning the process. As of 2012, several countries in the region—including Brazil, Chile, Costa<br />
Rica, and Peru—have created government departments to foster investment through PPPs. Most<br />
recently, in December 2011 the Mexican Congress approved the Public-Private Partnership Act,
a piece of legislation that aims to promote PPPs by providing an offi cial framework for public and private entities to<br />
enter into such agreements.<br />
PPIAF is expected to spearhead private participation in infrastructure activities in the region by piloting cutting-edge<br />
interventions and consolidating know-how that will benefi t initiatives worldwide. A good example of this is a recent<br />
activity with the Brazilian Forestry Service, which is in charge of awarding concessions for forest management of<br />
federal public forests in Brazil. Forest concessions on publicly-owned land can play a crucial role in the promotion<br />
of sustainable forest management and the reduction of illegal logging or forest conversion. The Brazilian federal<br />
government’s Forest Concession Program intends to create a new paradigm for forestry production in the Amazon,<br />
ensuring social control over this activity, fi ghting illegal land occupation, and inducing players in the logging sector<br />
to adopt a sustainable and business oriented behavior in their activities.<br />
Honduras: Support to Non-Revenue Water Performance-Based Contracting<br />
PPIAF Funding: $75,000<br />
Background: Access to water and sanitation services improved in<br />
Honduras in the 1990s, in both rural and urban areas. However, the<br />
sector’s weak institutional framework and competition between<br />
national, state, and municipal actors led to a lack of planning,<br />
inadequate regulation of operators, and poorly-defi ned policies.<br />
In 2003 the government of Honduras passed the Drinking Water<br />
and Sanitation Sector Framework Law, which created a central<br />
policy-making council (CONASA) and an independent regulatory<br />
agency (ERSAPS). The law also decentralized water and sanitation<br />
services, shifting the responsibility for operations from the national<br />
water and sewerage agency (SANAA) to municipalities.<br />
PPIAF’s Contribution: PPIAF assistance was requested in 2008 to support a non-revenue water (NRW)<br />
performance-based management contract for SANAA’s operations in Honduras’ capital city, Tegucigalpa<br />
Metropolitan District. The contract was piloted by a World Bank project to demonstrate how the private sector<br />
can be used as an effi cient means to achieve signifi cant improvements in operational and fi nancial performance.<br />
PPIAF funded several elements to ensure the contract design refl ected international best practice in NRW<br />
management, including training for SANAA staff on management and NRW contracts and a report on the<br />
lessons learned from the design and bidding process.<br />
Outcomes: The $6.5 million NRW contract went into effect July 1, 2011, and was awarded to a consortium<br />
made up of ACC Ingenieria SAS, Radian Colombia SAS, and Veritec Consulting Inc. The consortium’s obligations<br />
under the contract include: assessing the current conditions of the water supply; implementing minimum cost<br />
interventions to improve service reliability and hours of service; and reducing both physical and commercial<br />
losses to improve the utility’s income.
The track record of urban development projects (e.g., rapid transit systems), coupled with the fi nancial viability of<br />
some sub-national governments in Latin America, led to the need for innovative fi nancial tools to incorporate future<br />
gains in land value resulting from the realization of major infrastructure projects. One such fi nancial instrument is<br />
tradable development rights originally developed in Brazil. An SNTA project in Colombia is helping Bogotá tap private<br />
sources of fi nancing by auctioning additional building rights to private investors beyond what was initially permitted<br />
by the city’s zoning legislation. The resulting certifi cates are freely tradable instruments in the local stock exchange.<br />
The development of innovative fi nancial tools allows the public sector to mobilize private fi nancing for such infrastructure<br />
investments and frees up much-needed fi scal space to target other pressing social and economic concerns.<br />
PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />
• Belize (SNTA): Improve Municipal Creditworthiness for Belize Municipalities, approved July 15, 2011, $75,000<br />
• Brazil: Improving the Sustainable Forestry Concession Model in the Amazon, approved September 21, 2011,<br />
$400,000<br />
• Colombia (SNTA): Feasibility Study to Develop Tradable Air Rights Instruments to Mobilize Private Financing for<br />
Bogotá’s Carrera 7 Bus Rapid Transit Corridor, approved November 24, 2011, $179,780<br />
• Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income Housing Projects, approved March 4, 2012, 74,800<br />
• Mexico (SNTA): Strengthening Lending Market for Small Mexican Municipalities, approved August 10, 2011,<br />
$75,000<br />
• Panama: Preparation of a Performance-Based Effi ciency Improvement Contract for IDAAN’s Colón Business Unit,<br />
approved November 4, 2011, $74,975<br />
• Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure, approved January 8, 2012, $75,000<br />
• Uruguay: Development of Financing Options for PPPs in the Roads Sector, approved September 9, 2011,<br />
$250,000<br />
PPIAF has supported activities in: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican<br />
Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua,<br />
Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
REGIONAL UPDATE<br />
April 2012<br />
PPIAF’S WORK IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA<br />
Political turmoil has swept the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region since the<br />
Arab Spring, which began in Tunisia in December 2010 and spread to several other<br />
countries. The upheaval has had political and economic consequences across the region,<br />
yet its impact on public-private partnerships (PPPs) is still relatively unclear.<br />
Prior to the Arab Spring, growth rates in the region averaged around 3.2% and were<br />
insufficient to create enough jobs to match a rapidly growing labor force. In 2011 this<br />
growth rate fell to just 1.9% as unrest persisted and economic activity declined. Fiscal<br />
deficits and government debt levels in the MENA region have also grown, particularly<br />
in non-oil producing countries, as governments responded to the unrest by increasing<br />
spending on subsidy programs and cutting tax rates. Unemployment in the region,<br />
one of the contributing factors to the Arab Spring, is still around 10%, significantly<br />
higher than that in other regions. The problem is particularly acute among the youth<br />
and women, who are suffering from 20–25% and 30–35% unemployment, respectively.<br />
The MENA region is expected to experience a large increase in its working population,<br />
almost doubling to 605 million by 2050, and the region will need to create around 6.75<br />
million jobs per year until 2050 in order to avoid an increase in unemployment rates.<br />
As of March 31, 2012 PPIAF had provided $10,315,630 in funding to 61 projects in the<br />
MENA region, representing 5% of PPIAF’s total funding portfolio since inception. Since<br />
fiscal 2010, MENA activities have represented 11% of PPIAF’s portfolio, as requests<br />
for PPIAF assistance have grown more frequent due to recent increased interest from<br />
regional governments in private sector participation in the provision of infrastructure<br />
services. The portfolio is also evolving, from a focus on middle-income countries such<br />
as Jordan, Egypt, and Morocco, to focus on lower-income and fragile countries such as<br />
Djibouti and the West Bank and Gaza. On a sectoral basis, energy activities represent<br />
56% of PPIAF’s ongoing portfolio in the region, followed by 20% in water.<br />
As regional governments work towards economic development and growth, the provision of<br />
adequate infrastructure services has grown in importance. MENA countries have a critical need<br />
to upgrade their infrastructure to address past underinvestment and new demand, and a link<br />
was drawn between the Arab Spring and lack of access towards adequate infrastructure services.<br />
However, with state budgets stretched thin, regional governments face a serious challenge of<br />
increasing the quality and quantity of infrastructure services in MENA. Since the global fi nancial<br />
crisis, governments in the region are increasingly looking to leverage private sector management<br />
expertise and/or fi nancing to expand and improve infrastructure services. As a result, PPIAF’s MENA<br />
portfolio has been highly solicited by a range of governments to identify and implement PPPs.
PPIAF’s portfolio in low-income and fragile states has grown in fi scal 2012. In Djibouti, PPIAF is currently providing<br />
support to the solid waste and transport sectors, and recently approved three more activities in the energy and telecommunications<br />
sectors. The fi rst activity is assisting the government of Djibouti to refi ne its energy sector master<br />
plan, assess the cost of refurbishing existing generation plants, and identify least cost infrastructure investments that<br />
can be effectively fi nanced and managed through a PPP. It is anticipated that this analysis will help the government to<br />
defi ne a sector strategy that suits its energy and investments needs, and is cognizant of the potential for geothermal<br />
energy, which is currently being explored. The second energy activity is analyzing the technical, economic, and fi nancial<br />
feasibility of rural electrifi cation options to determine the most viable and sustainable roll-out option available to<br />
electrify 25 villages in rural Djibouti using solar energy. In addition, a third activity in the telecommunications sector<br />
is assessing sector liberalization options to help the government transform the sector into an engine of economic<br />
growth and employment.<br />
Morocco: PPP Unit<br />
PPIAF Funding: $245,700<br />
Background: The World Bank Group’s Country Partnership Strategy 2010–<br />
2013 for Morocco underlines the challenges related to underinvestment<br />
in infrastructure and the need to improve the quality and sustainability of<br />
infrastructure provision in Morocco. The government of Morocco, aware<br />
of these challenges, sought PPIAF support for assistance in launching its<br />
PPP program, designed to scale up infrastructure investments in sectors<br />
including energy, transportation, water, health, and education. The<br />
government’s commitment to exploring the PPP modality also relates<br />
to the country’s current economic context, where fi scal constraints and<br />
the impact of the global fi nancial crisis have limited the ability of the<br />
government to fi nance critical infrastructure investments.<br />
PPIAF’s Contribution: PPIAF provided support to assist the government of Morocco in launching its PPP<br />
program through the design of a dedicated PPP unit within the Directorate for State Enterprises and Privatization<br />
(DEPP), a specialized department within the Moroccan Ministry of Finance. The second component of the<br />
activity assisted in the identifi cation and screening of pilot PPP transactions. The activity also strengthened the<br />
DEPP’s PPP expertise via the organization of seminars. The medium-term goal of the activity was to identify PPP<br />
transactions that could be implemented within the framework of transaction advisory mandates to be led by<br />
the IFC’s PPP Transaction Advisory Services department.<br />
Outcomes: In May 2011, with assistance from PPIAF and the IFC, a central PPP Unit was established within the<br />
DEPP. The PPP unit is responsible for promoting PPPs in Morocco through coordination with sector ministries,<br />
and assisting in the development and implementation of PPP projects. The government is now discussing the<br />
drafting of a PPP Law as it seeks to develop and improve the enabling environment for PPPs in Morocco. The<br />
PPP identifi cation exercise launched under the PPIAF activity is also showing signs of success. Despite decisionmaking<br />
delays caused by the recent November 2011 parliamentary elections, several potential projects are<br />
being analyzed, including advising the National Social Security Agency (Caisse Nationale de Sécurite Sociale) in<br />
the development, structuring, and implementation of Morocco’s fi rst health PPP project, which would require<br />
a private operator to invest in, maintain, and operate a network of 13 clinics.
In the West Bank and Gaza, a strategic priority for PPIAF, two activities have thus far been approved in fi scal 2012. PPIAF<br />
is supporting the fi rst PPP transaction by providing funding for legal advisory transaction support for the Southern West<br />
Bank Solid Waste Management Project. The project, to be structured by the International Finance Corporation (IFC),<br />
is supporting the Joint Services Council for Hebron and Bethlehem in attracting private sector participation for the<br />
operation and maintenance of the new Al-Minya Landfi ll that will provide improved solid waste management services<br />
to approximately 780,000 inhabitants. The landfi ll is expected to open in early 2013 and will process approximately<br />
34% of the solid waste in the West Bank. It is designed based on international standards, and will dramatically improve<br />
sanitation services and help to eliminate the use of unregulated dump sites. The second activity is also innovative as it<br />
is one of the fi rst examples of support to the MENA region through PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA)<br />
program. The activity will work with municipalities across the West Bank and Gaza to improve and expand municipal<br />
revenue generation in order to improve municipalities’ creditworthiness. In the medium-term it is hoped that some of<br />
the best performing municipalities may be able to gain a credit rating, which will enable them to access market-based<br />
fi nance to fund infrastructure development.<br />
Looking forward, PPIAF assistance is needed to implement critical reforms in the energy, transport, and water sectors<br />
throughout the region, and to further transaction support to middle-income countries in pioneering sectors. Following<br />
the Arab Spring, political upheaval has ushered in a wave of new governments focused on responding to citizens’<br />
demands. Ensuring access to adequate infrastructure services will be crucial to spurring economic development and<br />
growth in the region, and providing jobs for an ever-growing labor force.<br />
Demand for PPIAF technical assistance is expected to grow as governments face the challenge of balancing fiscal<br />
constraints with the need to provide signifi cant investment to meet the infrastructure needs of the region. The global<br />
fi nancial crisis and recent political events have stagnated the PPP market in the region. PPIAF will provide support<br />
to governments to build PPP programs based on their individual requirements and the unique social, political, and<br />
demographic environments in each country.<br />
PPIAF and SNTA Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />
• Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment, approved October 24, 2011, $459,275<br />
• Djibouti: Feasibility Assessment for Solar Rural Electrifi cation, approved December 7, 2011, $400,600<br />
• Djibouti: Options for Telecoms Sector Liberalization, approved January 25, 2012, $107,690<br />
• Lebanon (SNTA): Facilitating Sub-National Government Access to Commercial Credit and Capital Markets,<br />
approved December 21, 2011, $75,000<br />
• Lebanon: Improving the Performance of the Beka’a Regional Water Authority, approved November 20, 2011,<br />
$75,000<br />
• MENA: Developing Alternative Broadband Networks, approved December 11, 2011, $74,510<br />
• MENA: Training Course on PPPs in the Water Sector, approved November 14, 2011, $50,000<br />
• West Bank and Gaza (SNTA): Improving Municipal Revenue Generation Policies and Framework, approved<br />
January 23, 2012, $161,300<br />
• West Bank and Gaza: Southern West Bank Solid Waste Management Project, approved December 16, 2011,<br />
$199,975<br />
PPIAF has supported activities in: Algeria, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria,<br />
Tunisia, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
REGIONAL UPDATE<br />
PPIAF’S WORK IN SOUTH ASIA<br />
April 2012<br />
South Asia—home to 1.5 billion people with over one billion living on less than $2 per<br />
day—has the largest global concentration of poor people. Since inception PPIAF and<br />
its Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program have provided $21,340,924 in<br />
funding to 124 activities in the South Asia Region, representing 10% of PPIAF’s total<br />
portfolio, including SNTA. India dominates the South Asia portfolio with 54 activities<br />
worth $8,918,541 approved since inception. The next most frequent recipient of PPIAF<br />
funding has been Pakistan with 12 activities, followed by Sri Lanka with 9. Multi-sector<br />
activities represent 44% or $9,596,218 of PPIAF’s portfolio in the region, followed by<br />
22% in water and 13% in energy. This South Asia total also incorporates $1,627,850 in<br />
funding to six SNTA activities since the start of that program in 2007—five in India and<br />
one in Nepal.<br />
In fi scal 2012, PPIAF has successfully rebalanced its South Asia portfolio to support the development<br />
of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in countries other than India in the region, particularly<br />
in the most lagging countries. PPIAF approved two activities in Bhutan, two in Sri Lanka, one in<br />
the Maldives, one in Nepal, and one in India.<br />
PPIAF has continued to support the development of strong PPP policies, programs, and pipelines<br />
across South Asia. In Bhutan, PPIAF approved an activity with the Ministry of Information and<br />
Communications to develop a strategic policy roadmap to guide the development of Bhutan’s<br />
telecommunications sector on the introduction of competition, divestment by the existing operators,<br />
and government transformation agenda to use the sector for cost-effective service delivery.<br />
In the Maldives, PPIAF provided management contract support to Malé City Council to structure<br />
and implement a viable tariff structure for waste management services, develop a mechanism for<br />
tariff collection, develop an information system to maintain user data, and monitor the performance<br />
of the concessionaire. In India, PPIAF is providing assistance to the Department of Economic<br />
Affairs in the Ministry of Finance with the preparation of a national PPP policy statement, to serve<br />
as guidance to the states as well as to central ministries as they pursue PPPs in the provision of<br />
infrastructure. In Sri Lanka, PPIAF approved an activity to develop the capacity of the Ministry of<br />
Economic Development and selected Provincial and Local Governments through a series of local<br />
workshops. This activity will contribute to identify a list of potential local infrastructure projects<br />
that could be implemented under a PPP model in the future.
PPIAF has also been supporting a number of screening activities and initial feasibility assessments of potential PPP<br />
infrastructure projects in Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. In Bhutan, the PPIAF-funded PPP feasibility assessment focuses<br />
on a dry port facility in Toribari and a new inter/intra-city bus terminal in Thimphu. In Nepal, PPIAF is helping to identify<br />
potential urban and transport projects that are suitable for fi nancing under a PPP arrangement. In Sri Lanka, PPIAF<br />
assistance is focusing more specifi cally on three potential PPPs: the redevelopment of railway stations in Colombo, a<br />
bulk water supply and transmission project in Bandarawela, and a solar park and wind farm in Mannar.<br />
Maldives: Supporting Private Sector Participation in the Solid Waste Sector<br />
PPIAF Funding: $145,000<br />
Background: The Maldives, a country of 192 inhabited islands with<br />
a population of 395,000, is known for its white-sand beaches and<br />
pristine environment. But its poor waste management practices<br />
were threatening its tourism industry, Maldives’ largest economic<br />
activity. Waste was collected in an ad-hoc manner and dumped at<br />
the shore, disposed of in the ocean, or transported to Thilafushi<br />
Island, where it was burnt openly. This combination of dumping<br />
and open burning destroyed the marine environment, polluted<br />
the air, and put the health of the country’s population at risk.<br />
PPIAF’s Contribution: To address this problem, the government of Maldives turned to PPIAF in 2009 to<br />
review options to introduce best practices in solid waste management through private sector participation in<br />
conjunction with the International Finance Corporation (IFC)’s mandate as lead transaction advisor to implement<br />
a waste management PPP project.<br />
PPIAF technical assistance recommended an institutional and regulatory framework to promote<br />
PPPs; an optimal collection, segregation, treatment, and disposal technology; measures to enhance<br />
the project’s fi nancial viability; and PPP options for the management of the solid waste services. The<br />
due diligence work also included drafting technical sections and performance obligations for the<br />
bidding process, pre-qualifi cation, and evaluation of the award of the waste management contract.<br />
Outcomes: In May 2011, the government successfully implemented a solid waste management PPP following<br />
PPIAF’s recommendations and with the help of IFC as lead transaction advisor. In September 2012, PPIAF<br />
approved a follow-up activity to help the Malé City Council structure and implement a viable tariff structure for<br />
waste management services provided under the management contract.
PPIAF Activities Approved in Fiscal 2012 (as of March 31, 2012)<br />
• Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects Under a PPP Model, approved January 12, 2012,<br />
$64,450<br />
• Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap, approved August 30, 2011, $75,000<br />
• India: Assistance in Finalization of a PPP Policy, approved November 1, 2011, $75,000<br />
• Maldives: Contract Management Support for Solid Waste Management PPP, approved September 17, 2011,<br />
$74,950<br />
• Nepal: Screening and Initial Feasibility Assessment of Potential Private-Public Infrastructure Projects, approved<br />
December 19, 2011, $50,000<br />
• Sri Lanka: Identifying PPP Opportunities for Local Governments, approved February 12, 2012, $75,000<br />
• Sri Lanka: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects under a PPP Model, approved March 21, 2012,<br />
$75,000<br />
PPIAF has supported activities in: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal,<br />
Pakistan, and Sri Lanka
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
March 2011<br />
IMPACT STORIES<br />
PPIAF Supports Small-Scale Water<br />
Providers in Uganda<br />
To complement and support the Uganda Small-Scale Infrastructure Provider (SSIP)<br />
Water Program, PPIAF support was sought in 2009 to assess private operators’<br />
ability to expand service delivery in Uganda’s water sector, which included<br />
reviewing the terms and conditions of available fi nancing and the constraints<br />
private operators face. The recommendations from the PPIAF-funded study were<br />
implemented by the International Finance Corporation (IFC), who organized training<br />
sessions to present the Uganda SSIP Water Program to local banks in Uganda to assess<br />
their interest in fi nancing private water operators. Following the training event, two<br />
banks expressed interest to provide pre-fi nancing loans to the pre-qualifi ed bidders for a<br />
tender in Busembatia, one of the small towns in the Uganda SSIP Water Program. The fi rst fi veyear<br />
management contract was awarded in June 2010 to a private operator for the expansion of<br />
piped water services in Busembatia. This private operator was able to receive a loan from DFCU Bank,<br />
a Ugandan commercial bank, of approximately $100,000 for the expansion of piped water services.<br />
The new operator agreed to install 400 new water connections during the fi rst two years of the<br />
contract, which is expected to benefi t 13,000 people.<br />
In small towns and rural areas of Uganda, where 90% of the population lives, water shortages<br />
are part of daily life. In these areas, 60% of the population lacks access to safe water, and waterborne<br />
diseases and infant mortality are widespread. Increasingly, the government of Uganda is<br />
reliant upon private operators to assist in the expansion of access to safe water supply within<br />
the country. These private operators are typically small and medium enterprises that are often<br />
unable to access fi nancing from local banks to operate and expand their businesses.<br />
To help the Ugandan government achieve greater effi ciency and improve access to water,<br />
the IFC was appointed by the Ugandan Ministry of Water and Environment as an Advisor<br />
to the Department of Water Development to assess the feasibility of various public-private<br />
partnership (PPP) options for private operators to increase sustainability and effi ciency in the<br />
distribution of water to small towns and rural areas. The resulting Uganda SSIP Water Program,<br />
initiated in 2007, aimed to structure and implement PPP transactions in fi ve small towns in the<br />
eastern region of Uganda (Kamuli, Nawanyago, Palisa, Tirinyi, and Nankoma), which would<br />
serve as replicable models for the water sector. During implementation of program activities,<br />
an additional fi ve towns, including Busembatia, were added. The program comprised three<br />
components: 1) the design of access to fi nance interventions to facilitate fi nancing for private<br />
operators; 2) transaction structuring and implementation of water PPPs; and 3) provision of<br />
related public sector capacity building interventions for local government offi cials and technical<br />
staff from the Ministry of Water and Environment.<br />
PPIAF SUPPORT<br />
The government of Uganda, together with the IFC, sought Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility<br />
(PPIAF) support in 2009 for a study to assess private operators’ ability to expand service delivery in<br />
Uganda’s water sector. The objectives of the study were to 1) defi ne the characteristics of the private
operators participating in PPPs in Uganda’s water sector; 2)<br />
examine their constraints and potential remedies to improve<br />
their service delivery; and 3) assess the terms and conditions<br />
of private fi nancing available to the private operators. The<br />
study provided recommendations to address the constraints<br />
of high operating costs and lack of access to fi nance, such as:<br />
• Educate banks about private operator operations and activities<br />
to increase assurance of the repayment of loans<br />
• Extend the duration of the management contracts from<br />
three to a minimum of fi ve years to allow private operators<br />
to invest over a longer period and improve service<br />
delivery, as well as re<strong>cover</strong> the initial funds invested in<br />
the water schemes, which would also give their potential<br />
fi nanciers confi dence about the possibility of re<strong>cover</strong>ing<br />
their loans<br />
• Cluster small towns together to improve the viability of<br />
businesses, make supervision more effi cient, and allow<br />
for larger contracts that capture economies of scale<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
The IFC incorporated the recommendations from the PPIAFfunded<br />
study in the Uganda SSIP Water Program. In particular,<br />
the IFC proposed a generic contract with a minimum<br />
term of fi ve years that would appeal to both private operators<br />
and lenders. The IFC also proposed clustering towns<br />
within close proximity to another, but since funding was<br />
eventually only secured for one town, this approach could<br />
not be implemented. Furthermore, the IFC identifi ed alternative<br />
fi nancing models with greater potential for success<br />
including leveraging its relationship with local banks<br />
in Uganda, which were presented with a viable business<br />
model for small-town water operations for the fi rst time.<br />
Findings and recommendations from the study were also<br />
used to design and implement an effective training session<br />
to present information on the Uganda SSIP Water Program<br />
to local banks in Uganda and assess their interest in<br />
providing fi nancing to private water operators. This training<br />
provided a platform where the Ministry of Water and<br />
Environment and the Association of Private Water Operators<br />
could engage for the fi rst time with local banks to describe<br />
the operation of privately-operated water schemes.<br />
The training also addressed weaknesses in the area of<br />
RELATED PPIAF ACTIVITIES<br />
IN UGANDA<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />
contract administration among public sector stakeholders<br />
based on the proposed generic management contract.<br />
Following the training event, two banks expressed interest<br />
to provide pre-fi nancing loans to the pre-qualifi ed<br />
bidders for a tender in Busembatia, one of the small<br />
towns in the Uganda SSIP Water Program. These loans<br />
would be refi nanced by a subsidy provided by the Global<br />
Partnership on Output-Based Aid (GPOBA) upon verifi<br />
cation of the water connections and water supply.<br />
As a result, the fi rst fi ve-year management contract was<br />
awarded in June 2010 for the town of Busembatia to<br />
a private operator, Trandint Limited, who had the lowest<br />
bid with a required subsidy of $270,000 for the expansion<br />
of piped water services. This winning private<br />
operator was able to receive a loan from DFCU Bank, a<br />
Ugandan commercial bank, of approximately $100,000.<br />
DONOR COORDINATION<br />
This PPIAF activity complemented the Uganda SSIP Water<br />
Program, in partnership with the Austrian Development<br />
Agency via the DevCo vehicle. It also complemented<br />
the pilot output-based aid scheme designed and funded<br />
by GPOBA in 10 small towns and rural growth centers.<br />
IMPACTS<br />
The new operator agreed to install 400 new water<br />
connections during the fi rst two years of the contract,<br />
which is expected to benefi t 13,000 people.<br />
• 2000: Country Framework Report, $400,000<br />
• 2007: Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Unit<br />
Feasibility Study, $325,000<br />
• 2009: Private Water Service Delivery Access to<br />
Finance, $74,810
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
November 2011<br />
IMPACT STORIES<br />
PPIAF Helps Peruvian Sub-Nationals<br />
Tap Financial Markets<br />
PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) program is helping sub-national<br />
government entities in Peru raise market-based fi nancing for much needed<br />
infrastructure investment. Since 2008, SNTA has assisted eight regional and<br />
municipal entities by facilitating credit ratings, implementing fi nancial assessments<br />
and coaching, supporting transaction preparation, and helping the central<br />
government monitor and evaluate the fi nancial health of local authorities.<br />
As a result of SNTA support, the Municipality of Lima signed a $70 million commercial<br />
bank loan with BBVA Banco Continental in April 2010—the largest market-based borrowing<br />
ever concluded by a sub-national government entity in Peru. The loan was partially backed by<br />
a $32 million IFC guarantee. SNTA technical assistance also helped the Regional Government of<br />
Arequipa obtain a $10 million commercial bank loan in January 2011 to fi nance a regional road<br />
rehabilitation project.<br />
Until 2002, Peru was one of the more centralized countries in Latin America. The government’s<br />
approach to fi scal decentralization was a cautious and gradual one. However, a policy shift in<br />
2002 led to the passage of the Decentralization Framework Law, which established the guiding<br />
principles of a political and fi scal decentralization process.<br />
Because of the limited authority of sub-national governments to raise tax revenues and the<br />
absence of a sub-national debt market, local governments in Peru rely heavily on government<br />
transfers for both operating and capital expenditures. Regional governments, in particular, have<br />
no authority to levy taxes and hence rely almost fully on central government transfers for both<br />
operating expenditures and investments. Municipalities fi nance a higher percentage of their<br />
expenditures from their own sources (e.g., property tax, real estate transaction tax, various fees,<br />
sale of goods and services, etc.), but have no authority to set local tax rates and rely heavily on<br />
government transfers for capital expenditures.<br />
Local governments are exploring options to better leverage their resources in order to meet large<br />
infrastructure investment needs. Currently, borrowing accounts for only 1% of such investment<br />
funding, with virtually all of that in Lima. Commercial banks restrict their activities to fi nancing<br />
working capital for a small number of local governments. To date, the only sub-national bonds<br />
issued securitized Lima’s toll road revenues, allowing for greater investment in roads.<br />
PPIAF SUPPORT<br />
In 2008 and 2009 PPIAF’s SNTA program funded two technical assistance grants designed to facilitate<br />
Peruvian sub-national governments access fi nancing from commercial banks and capital markets, as a<br />
way to complement existing government transfers and revenues, diversify funding sources, lengthen the<br />
maturity of available commercial bank fi nancing, create and strengthen credit histories, and introduce<br />
fi nancial discipline. The objective was to strengthen fi nancial standing and management capacity and<br />
help sub-nationals prepare infrastructure projects for commercial fi nancing.
A workshop on sustainable development plans for provincial<br />
and regional governments was held in April 2010, and<br />
used international examples to demonstrate how access to<br />
market-based fi nance can result from fi scal discipline, sound<br />
fi nancial management, and investment planning. The fi rst<br />
SNTA grant helped the Municipality of Lima obtain a credit<br />
rating from an international credit rating agency, identify<br />
potential sources of fi nance for new infrastructure investments,<br />
and assess ways of replacing existing short-term debt<br />
with sustainable longer-term fi nancing. This work resulted<br />
in compliance with sub-national fi scal prudence rules and<br />
helped Lima make a signifi cant contribution to the Metropolitano<br />
Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project, also supported<br />
by the World Bank and the Inter-American Development<br />
Bank. The second SNTA grant helped the Regional Governments<br />
of Arequipa and Cuzco, the Provincial Municipality of<br />
Santa (Chimbote), the Municipality of Piura, and Arequipa’s<br />
water utility SEDAPAR prepare for and obtain credit ratings<br />
from a local credit rating agency. In the case of the Regional<br />
Government of Arequipa, SNTA’s technical assistance also<br />
included support in navigating the sub-national borrowing<br />
approval process, fi nancial coaching, and a review of technical<br />
documentation.<br />
DONOR COORDINATION<br />
SNTA activities complemented on-going work in Peru by<br />
several donors and international fi nance institutions, including<br />
work by the United Nations on water utility fi nancing,<br />
successful efforts by the International Finance Corporation<br />
(IFC) to establish a sub-national guarantee facility in 2008,<br />
and funding from the World Bank to the central government<br />
for projects executed by regional authorities.<br />
Since 1999 PPIAF, a<br />
multidonor technical<br />
assistance facility, has helped<br />
developing countries use publicprivate<br />
partnerships to improve their<br />
infrastructure. A key focus has been<br />
upstream technical assistance to support<br />
the development of an enabling<br />
environment for such partnerships.<br />
This series highlights how PPIAF’s support<br />
has made an impact on the ground.<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />
SNTA’s technical assistance, and close collaboration with key<br />
partners, facilitated a $70 million commercial bank loan to<br />
the Municipality of Lima by BBVA Banco Continental, signed<br />
in April 2010. The loan was partially backed by a $32 million<br />
IFC guarantee. This was the largest market-based fi nancing<br />
ever realized by a sub-national government entity in Peru.<br />
The maturity of this loan was double that of previous debt<br />
incurred by the municipality.<br />
As a result of the second phase of SNTA support, the Regional<br />
Government of Arequipa signed a $10 million loan<br />
with a local commercial bank—the fi rst time a Regional<br />
Government in Peru borrowed without a sovereign guarantee.<br />
As in Lima’s case, the loan was backed by another IFC<br />
guarantee. All other banks invited to arrange the fi nancing<br />
(without IFC’s guarantee) declined interest in the transaction.<br />
With the help of this loan, Arequipa will fi nance its<br />
regional road rehabilitation program.<br />
Other Peruvian authorities supported by PPIAF’s SNTA program<br />
are also advancing steadily toward creditworthiness<br />
and additional transactions are expected.<br />
IMPACTS<br />
By doubling the tenor of the BBVA loan, the Municipality<br />
of Lima’s monthly debt service payments were much more<br />
affordable and left more city revenues available to <strong>cover</strong><br />
critical operating expenses. Important milestones were also<br />
reached in improving Lima’s fi nancial management, such<br />
as the consolidation of the accounts of the Municipality<br />
of Lima and the 19 public companies and other entities it<br />
controls.<br />
RELATED PPIAF/SNTA ACTIVITIES IN PERU<br />
• 2008: Access to Commercial Banks and Capital<br />
Markets (SNTA), $355,296<br />
• 2009: Access to Commercial Banks and Capital<br />
Markets, Phase II (SNTA), $499,776<br />
• 2010: Strategic Plan for the Universal Service Fund,<br />
$75,000<br />
• 2011: Technical Assistance to the Metropolitan<br />
Municipality of Lima (SNTA), $350,000<br />
• 2011: Technical Assistance to Peruvian Water<br />
Utilities (SNTA), $75,000<br />
Learn more about SNTA at<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org/snta
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
April 2011<br />
IMPACT STORIES<br />
SNTA Supports a Water Utility in<br />
Brazil’s Frontier Region<br />
PPIAF’s Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) support to the Brazilian water<br />
utility DESO has helped to secure a BRL 18.9 million fi nancing by substantially<br />
improving the company’s ability to interact with fi nanciers. SNTA provided<br />
technical assistance in 2010 to help DESO prepare fi nancial projections and a<br />
credit memorandum on the company. By delivering this forward-looking analysis<br />
to the company and going through the process of discussing the impact of the key<br />
turnaround initiatives in future fi nancials, the company has attracted more interest<br />
from commercial banks to refi nance the company’s BRL 40 million short- and mediumterm<br />
debt.<br />
As a result of SNTA support, a Brazilian water utility in a frontier region became ready to borrow<br />
on commercial terms and, through the fi nancing obtained, gained effi ciencies by reducing<br />
water losses and energy consumption.<br />
The water company owned by the Brazilian state government of Sergipe (“DESO”) had gone<br />
through several years of mismanagement when, in early 2007, the state government decided<br />
to hire professional managers to run the company. Although the results of the management<br />
change were starting to show, the company still did not have access to commercial sources or<br />
to local development fi nance institutions. DESO could not adequately demonstrate the impact<br />
of the fi nancial and operational turnaround being implemented to the potential fi nanciers.<br />
Furthermore, they did not have suffi cient capacity or experience to prepare a forward-looking<br />
view that investors and fi nanciers would normally request.<br />
PPIAF SUPPORT<br />
The state government of Sergipe thus sought assistance from the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory<br />
Facility (PPIAF)’s SNTA program in 2010 to improve the company’s ability to interact with potential fi nanciers.<br />
PPIAF-SNTA quickly brought in a fi nancial consultant to assist DESO in preparing fi nancial projections<br />
and a credit memorandum on the company.<br />
Only a handful of top tier pubic water utilities in Brazil have access to both commercial banking and capital<br />
markets. They have the capacity and experience to prepare information and conduct forward looking<br />
analysis to show their creditworthiness. The rest of the water utilities have much more limited capacity<br />
and experience in dealing with commercial banking and capital markets. Water utilities in the north and<br />
northeast of Brazil lag particularly behind, given the lower income client base and precarious fi nancial<br />
situation, exacerbated by generally weak corporate governance and lack of well trained and skilled staff<br />
on fi nancial assessments. Not all utilities are suited for private management, given the operating environment,<br />
including political sensitivity. In such a case, private fi nancing of infrastructure may be a more<br />
effective way to introduce commercial orientation, better disclosure of fi nancial operational information,<br />
medium-term planning, and even better corporate governance. To this effect, SNTA helped the Brazilian<br />
water utility DESO achieve the following objectives:
• Prepare the key fi nancial and operational information,<br />
including historical and projected fi nancial statements<br />
• Assess and quantify the fi nancial and operational impact<br />
of the proposed institutional development programs<br />
• Compile other key information normally requested by<br />
commercial banks, including environmental and social<br />
practices, corporate governance, insurance policy, etc.<br />
• Provide training to the companies’ fi nance and planning<br />
teams on the use of fi nancial assessments and<br />
projections<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
As a result of the PPIAF-SNTA support, the company was<br />
able to borrow on commercial terms. While the SNTAfunded<br />
activity primarily helped DESO access a BRL 18.9 million<br />
loan from the International Finance Corporation (IFC),<br />
it is expected that, as a result of this assistance, the utility<br />
will also have access to capital market instruments such as<br />
CCB (Brazilian medium-term bond), FIDC (securitization of<br />
receivables), and debentures, which require further disclosure<br />
and better corporate governance.<br />
The appraisal revealed a company with qualifi ed fi nancial<br />
statements and a low operating cash fl ow, but improving at<br />
a fast pace. In addition, the team identifi ed high quality collateral<br />
available to be pledged, which substantially reduced<br />
the credit risk for potential investors. The team mitigated<br />
credit risk with a pledge of receivables from water supply<br />
to one of the largest oil companies in the world (Petrobras)<br />
and receivables from sales to a diversifi ed pool of customers.<br />
Each of these components was expected to exceed debt<br />
service by multiple times. The company also committed to<br />
Since 1999 PPIAF, a<br />
multidonor technical<br />
assistance facility, has helped<br />
developing countries use publicprivate<br />
partnerships to improve their<br />
infrastructure. A key focus has been<br />
upstream technical assistance to support<br />
the development of an enabling<br />
environment for such partnerships.<br />
This series highlights how PPIAF’s support<br />
has made an impact on the ground.<br />
not increase indebtedness and undertook to implement a<br />
plan to eliminate all auditors’ qualifi cations on the fi nancial<br />
statements. To further improve the credit profi le, IFC agreed<br />
to jointly approach local banks to form a syndicate to refi -<br />
nance DESO’s short-term debt.<br />
DONOR COORDINATION<br />
This activity complements World Bank projects in the states<br />
of Sergipe, currently under preparation, and in Rio Grande<br />
do Norte, under execution, which address the states-wide<br />
water resources management issues as well as sector regulatory<br />
issues. Furthermore, the two projects mentioned<br />
above include components for expanding water supply and<br />
wastewater services.<br />
IMPACTS<br />
The BRL 18.9 million project—now fi nanced—will reduce<br />
water losses that were approaching 50% and make customers<br />
more accountable for their water use, which are critical<br />
in a water scarce state, where water for the metropolitan<br />
area is brought from 100 kilometers away. In addition to<br />
saving part of the costs associated with pumping the water<br />
over long distances by reducing water losses, the volume<br />
saved will increase availability of water to the population,<br />
which has recently faced rationing periods.<br />
A subsequent World Bank loan that will be complementary<br />
to the loan fi nanced by the IFC is designed to fi nance<br />
complex and broad water sector institutional reforms at the<br />
state level and investments in water supply, sewerage expansion,<br />
irrigation improvements, and other initiatives with<br />
over 25 years of tenor and at a spread over LIBOR of less<br />
than one tenth of IFC’s spread.<br />
RELATED SNTA ACTIVITIES<br />
IN BRAZIL<br />
• 2008: COMPESA IPO Action Planning, $29,000<br />
• 2008: Strategy for Restructuring of Eletrobras,<br />
$380,000<br />
Learn more about SNTA at<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org/snta<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
May 2011<br />
IMPACT STORIES<br />
PPIAF Supports Private Sector<br />
Participation in the Solid Waste<br />
Sector in Ethiopia<br />
PPIAF has supported the government of Ethiopia in the formulation of a strategy<br />
for private sector involvement in municipal solid waste management. PPIAF<br />
provided funding in 2002 for a comprehensive diagnosis of the solid waste<br />
sector, including generation, collection, storage, transport, and disposal of waste.<br />
These fi ndings were presented at four stakeholder workshops on private sector<br />
participation in the sector, and further insights into international best practices<br />
appropriate for Ethiopia were gained through two study tours to South Africa and Egypt.<br />
As a result of the PPIAF study, in February 2007 the Ethiopian President passed the<br />
Solid Waste Management Proclamation No. 513/2007, which allows private operators to<br />
obtain a permit to engage in the collection, transportation, and use or disposal of waste.<br />
As of April 2011, 524 private enterprises in the Municipality of Addis Ababa have obtained the<br />
necessary permits to perform primary solid waste collection, employing a total of 5,815 waste<br />
collectors. Consequently, the municipality has increased the garbage collection rate from 60% to<br />
80%, resulting in an additional 600,000 residents in Addis Ababa having their waste collected.<br />
Despite deregulation in the 1990s, which permitted increased private sector participation (PSP)<br />
in the provision of infrastructure services, the absence of an appropriate policy and regulatory<br />
environment continued to inhibit PSP. By 2002 municipal solid waste management (SWM) was in<br />
a poor state in Ethiopia. SWM had not been a national priority and investments were minimal;<br />
it existed in some cities but not in most rural areas and there was no overall national strategy<br />
for SWM. Poor waste collection and disposal practices had signifi cant environmental and health<br />
impacts. There was no formal structure for charging waste generators and weak fi nancial and<br />
cost re<strong>cover</strong>y systems were one of the major sources of poor waste management performance.<br />
Thus, there was considerable potential for improvements in SWM performance through<br />
effi ciencies gained from the introduction of the private sector. However, PSP in SWM was<br />
limited to informal pre-collection companies in Addis Ababa and a few other cities. Moreover,<br />
there was virtually no capacity within government to develop appropriate SWM contracts and<br />
to carry out the tendering and evaluation process for PSP.<br />
It was essential that the necessary framework for PSP be developed before contracts were tendered<br />
and the private sector became formally engaged in SWM operations, and it was in this context<br />
that the government requested support from the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility<br />
(PPIAF) for the development of an appropriate strategy and framework for PSP in the SWM sector.<br />
PPIAF SUPPORT<br />
In late 2002 the government of Ethiopia, through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sought<br />
PPIAF support to: 1) provide a diagnostic of the solid waste sector in the country, 2) assess the legal and<br />
institutional changes required for greater PSP in the sector, 3) assess the available opportunities and options<br />
available to EPA for PSP in the sector, and 4) recommend policy, institutional reforms, strategy, and<br />
applicable laws necessary for greater PSP in the sector.
In addition to the diagnostic report, PPIAF funded a training<br />
course on fi nance and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y options in the SWM<br />
sector, four consultation workshops with relevant stakeholders,<br />
and two study tours to South Africa and Egypt<br />
to learn from African experiences of PSP in the sector.<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
Following the PPIAF activity, consensus was achieved on the<br />
value of the incorporation of private sector enterprises in<br />
the solid waste sector. In addition, the PPIAF-funded training<br />
course and study tours increased the technical capacity<br />
of municipality staff to understand the principles of private<br />
fi nancing, operation, and cost re<strong>cover</strong>y in the sector, which<br />
was crucial before staff began supervising the tendering<br />
and evaluation of PSP in the sector.<br />
Subsequently the EPA began a full review of the national<br />
SWM strategy, to incorporate policy provisions for PSP in<br />
SWM generated by the study. As a result, in February 2007,<br />
the President passed the Solid Waste Management Proclamation<br />
No. 513/2007.<br />
The proclamation encouraged urban administrations to create<br />
appropriate enabling conditions to promote private investment<br />
and operation in the provision of SWM services,<br />
and allowed private operators to obtain a permit to engage<br />
in the collection, transportation, and use or disposal of<br />
waste. The objective of the proclamation was to increase<br />
solid waste collection rates to reduce the potential negative<br />
environmental and social impacts of insuffi cient SWM,<br />
and provide economic and social benefi t through increased<br />
private sector involvement in the sector.<br />
DONOR COORDINATION<br />
Together with PPIAF assistance to the sector, other donors<br />
have also been active in the solid waste sector in Ethiopia.<br />
In May 2007 the Agence Française de Développement approved<br />
€5.4 million in funding—out of total project cost of<br />
€27.76 million—for the construction of four transfer stations<br />
to reduce the distance from primary collection sites to<br />
the landfi lls. The main objective of the project is to improve<br />
living conditions in Addis Ababa by supporting the amelioration<br />
of solid waste management and infrastructure.<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />
In addition, in May 2008 the World Bank approved a $145<br />
million loan to support improved performance in the planning,<br />
delivery, and sustained provision of priority municipal<br />
services and infrastructure by urban local governments. The<br />
project includes signifi cant focus on solid waste management<br />
and the provision of related infrastructure, facilities,<br />
and machinery. The activity also provides assistance for urban<br />
local governments interested in entering into service<br />
contracts with private enterprises for the collection of solid<br />
waste.<br />
IMPACTS<br />
The Municipality of Addis Ababa is the largest municipality<br />
in Ethiopia with over 3 million residents. Following the 2007<br />
proclamation, the municipality was divided into 549 collection<br />
zones comprising 800–1000 households, with one private<br />
enterprise assigned to each zone. Service charges for<br />
waste collection are collected as part of water consumption<br />
rates, and payment for the private operators is on a volume<br />
based rate of 30 birr (around $1.75) per m 3 of waste<br />
collected.<br />
As of April 2011, 524 enterprises have obtained the necessary<br />
permits to perform solid waste collection in Addis<br />
Ababa, employing a total of 5,815 operators. These operators<br />
are focused on primary collection of solid waste.<br />
Consequently, in Addis Ababa, the municipality has increased<br />
the garbage collection rate from 60% to 80% and<br />
more than 200,000 tons of waste are now collected each<br />
year. As a result, an additional 600,000 residents in Addis<br />
Ababa now have their waste collected.<br />
RELATED PPIAF ACTIVITIES<br />
IN ETHIOPIA<br />
• 2002: Workshop on Private Sector Participation in<br />
the Water Sector, $71,400
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY<br />
January 2012<br />
IMPACT STORIES<br />
PPIAF Support to the Enabling<br />
Environment for Public-Private<br />
Partnerships in Malawi<br />
PPIAF support to the government of Malawi has led to a strong legislative and<br />
institutional public-private partnership (PPP) framework that will pave the way<br />
for increased private sector participation in the provision of basic infrastructure<br />
services. PPIAF support began in 2000 to design regulatory and institutional<br />
arrangements for oversight of key infrastructure sectors, which led to legislative and<br />
regulatory reform in the energy sector. In 2005 PPIAF provided additional assistance<br />
to mobilize a national PPP program through the drafting of a PPP Law and PPP policy<br />
framework, and the establishment of a PPP unit. The PPP policy framework was passed by<br />
Cabinet in May 2011, and the PPP Law was passed through Parliament in November 2011. As part<br />
of the new legislation, the Privatization Commission will transition to become the PPP Commission.<br />
In the late 1990s the government of Malawi chose to pursue greater private participation in<br />
and the liberalization of its infrastructure services, with a view to increasing the quality of<br />
and access to infrastructure services while minimizing the drain on public resources. A survey<br />
of the private sector conducted for the 1997 World Development Report had identifi ed the<br />
deterioration of Malawi’s infrastructure to be the principal constraint to private business. In<br />
response, the government began a long process of improving the enabling environment for<br />
PPPs, with the aim of lowering investors’ risk perceptions and increasing government capacity<br />
to develop, implement, and monitor PPP projects.<br />
The government of Malawi had successfully developed a comprehensive policy, legislative, and<br />
institutional framework to serve the needs of its privatization program. However, the concept<br />
of introducing private sector participation in the delivery of public services through PPPs was<br />
still new in Malawi. Thus, the government decided that the establishment of a strategic PPP<br />
framework, consisting of a clear guiding policy, appropriate legal and regulatory provisions,<br />
and an institutional set-up capable of effi cient implementation of PPP projects, was necessary.<br />
Between 2000 and 2007 the government of Malawi sought assistance on three occasions from<br />
the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF) to improve the legal, regulatory, and<br />
institutional framework for private participation in infrastructure.<br />
PPIAF SUPPORT<br />
The government of Malawi requested PPIAF support in 2000 to help design an appropriate regulatory<br />
framework for private participation in infrastructure. The PPIAF-funded report assessed regulatory options<br />
for utilities and recommended the establishment of two new regulatory bodies, a combined energy<br />
and water regulator, and a transport regulator. The activity also designed an appropriate institutional<br />
structure, draft enabling legislation, and an implementation plan for the operationalization of the regulatory<br />
bodies.<br />
In 2005 the government approached PPIAF for further assistance in developing an appropriate PPP framework.<br />
PPIAF provided support to the development of policies, laws, and regulations that defi ned the
scope of authority within the various spheres of government<br />
to enter into PPP contracts. PPIAF also designed an institutional<br />
set-up to support and streamline PPP implementation,<br />
guided by a set of institutional development principles.<br />
Following the recommendations of the 2005 activity, the<br />
government of Malawi requested support for a third time<br />
to establish detailed PPP procedures and guidelines for project<br />
conception, preparation, procurement, and management,<br />
to create the right environment for the transparent<br />
and successful development of infrastructure PPP projects.<br />
In addition to the preparation of the operating procedures<br />
and guidelines for PPP implementation, PPIAF also provided<br />
funds for the drafting of PPP policy framework and the review<br />
of a draft PPP Law.<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
Following the fi rst PPIAF activity, the government passed a<br />
new legal framework for the energy sector, consisting of<br />
the Energy Regulatory Act No. 20 of 2004, the Rural Electrifi<br />
cation Act No. 21 of 2004, and the Electricity Act No.<br />
22 of 2004. The Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority was<br />
established under Act No. 20 of 2004 as Malawi’s energy<br />
sector regulator. The authority’s mandate is to regulate the<br />
energy sector in Malawi in a fair, transparent, effi cient, and<br />
cost-effective manner for the benefi t of the consumers and<br />
operators. In 2007 the fi rst Commissioners of the energy<br />
regulator were appointed.<br />
The second and third PPIAF activities have also garnered<br />
solid outcomes. The operations guidelines and standard<br />
documents and procedures prepared under the PPIAF activity<br />
were subsequently published on the Privatization Commission’s<br />
website. In May 2011 the Public-Private Partnership<br />
Since 1999 PPIAF, a<br />
multidonor technical<br />
assistance facility, has helped<br />
developing countries use publicprivate<br />
partnerships to improve their<br />
infrastructure. A key focus has been<br />
upstream technical assistance to support<br />
the development of an enabling<br />
environment for such partnerships.<br />
This series highlights how PPIAF’s support<br />
has made an impact on the ground.<br />
www.<strong>ppiaf</strong>.org<br />
Policy Framework was passed by Cabinet, laying out the<br />
government’s commitment to promoting private infrastructure<br />
investment, setting out the policy framework for the<br />
initiation, design, and implementation of PPPs, and promoting<br />
PPPs as a new form of procuring and fi nancing infrastructure<br />
projects and services. In November 2011 the<br />
Malawian Parliament passed “Bill No. 13 of 2011: Public-<br />
Private Partnership.” The law provides the legal framework<br />
for the participation of private entities in government projects.<br />
Following the passing of the PPP Law, the Privatization<br />
Commission will be strengthened and assume new responsibilities,<br />
formally becoming the implementation agency<br />
for PPPs, and will be renamed as the PPP Commission.<br />
DONOR COORDINATION<br />
Several donors are active in support of private sector participation<br />
in infrastructure development in Malawi, including<br />
the World Bank, the UK’s Department for International Development,<br />
and the United States Agency for International<br />
Development.<br />
IMPACTS<br />
Since 2000 PPIAF has supported three activities in Malawi to<br />
identify and defi ne the most appropriate enabling environment<br />
for PPPs. PPIAF is currently providing assistance for the<br />
renegotiation of the concession of the Malawi Rail Network,<br />
and the extension of the railway by Vale. It is expected that<br />
government commitment to the PPP agenda and the sound<br />
enabling environment for PPPs facilitated by PPIAF will help<br />
to build a pipeline of PPP transactions in Malawi.<br />
RELATED PPIAF ACTIVITIES<br />
IN MALAWI<br />
• 2001: Harmonization of the Institutional and<br />
Regulatory Framework, $200,000<br />
• 2005: PPP Legal and Regulatory Framework,<br />
$269,000<br />
• 2006: Create the Enabling Policy and Legal<br />
Environment for Improved Access to Information<br />
and Communication Technology (ICT) Services in<br />
Rural and Remote Areas, $365,000<br />
• 2007: PPP Implementation—Development of<br />
Regulations and Procedures, $251,500
PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund for Middle-<br />
Income Countries<br />
Status Report<br />
April 2012
Overview<br />
Table of Contents<br />
I. Activities Funded through PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
1. Egypt: Improving Private Sector Participation in the Municipal Solid Waste Management<br />
Sector<br />
2. South Africa: Independent Power Producer Regulatory Framework<br />
3. Colombia: Support to Concession Agency (INCO)<br />
4. Vietnam: PPP Viability Study for the Ninh Bin–Than Hoa–Bai Vot Expressway<br />
5. Vietnam: Capacity Building to Review Waste-to-Energy Project Proposals in Ho Chi Minh City<br />
6. Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-Based Contracts for Road Maintenance<br />
7. Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure<br />
8. Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income Housing Projects<br />
9. Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water Supply in Ghana (Phase 2)<br />
10. South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg<br />
11. Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID<br />
System for the Delivery of Public Services<br />
II. Looking Ahead<br />
Annexes<br />
Annex 1: Table of Approved Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-<br />
Core Trust Fund<br />
Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
1
Overview<br />
The PPIAF Trust Fund for Middle-Income Countries was set up in 2010 as a non-core multi-donor trust<br />
fund. It is fully funded by Switzerland and supports a program of country-specific and multi-country<br />
advisory and related activities in selected middle-income countries through the following activities:<br />
� Framing infrastructure development strategies to take full advantage of the potential for private<br />
sector involvement<br />
� Building consensus for appropriate policy, regulatory, and institutional reforms<br />
� Designing and implementing specific policy, regulatory, and institutional reforms<br />
� Supporting the design and implementation of pioneering projects and transactions<br />
� Building government capacity in the design and execution of private infrastructure arrangements<br />
and in the regulation of private service providers<br />
The countries able to benefit from this trust fund are Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, Indonesia, Peru, Vietnam,<br />
and South Africa.<br />
Annex 1 provides more information about the approved activities, and Annex 2 provides a<br />
statement of funding for this trust fund.<br />
I. Activities Funded through PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
Since 2010, PPIAF has supported eleven activities from the Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust<br />
Fund.<br />
1. Egypt: Improving Private Sector Participation in the Municipal Solid Waste Management<br />
Sector ($250,000): this activity was approved on December 2, 2009. Note that the activity was originally<br />
approved ahead of the establishment of the Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund and then,<br />
with SECO's approval, transferred to that non-core fund once it was set up.<br />
The activity is assessing the current state of private sector participation in the Municipal Solid Waste<br />
Management (MSWM) sector in Egypt, in the context of the National Strategy for Integrated Solid Waste<br />
Management, prepared in 2000. It will provide recommendations to increase involvement of the private<br />
sector in the MSWM sector and to improve cost effectiveness.<br />
Recent major political events in Egypt continue to affect the progress of the activity, which had already<br />
completed its first deliverable on schedule (i.e., the initial draft report reviewing the current institutional,<br />
political, legal, and financing environment in Egypt to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the<br />
system). The next steps will require engagement with the government at national and municipal levels to<br />
receive their feedback on the initial report in the development and finalization of a strategic framework for<br />
more efficient, cost effective, and streamlined participation of the private sector in municipal solid waste<br />
management services. The initial draft study report has been widely shared with all stakeholders and a<br />
draft strategic action plan was developed in close collaboration with the Ministry of Local Development<br />
and Ministry of Environment. A consultation workshop is being planned shortly to seek inputs from<br />
various stakeholders on the draft strategic action plan. This workshop has been delayed due to the<br />
parliamentary elections.<br />
An extension was granted until September 2012 to allow time for the completion of the consultations and<br />
also for finalizing the findings of the study. The activity is still of importance to the government.<br />
2
Results to Date of the Municipal Solid Waste Management Sector Activity<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� The report on Private Sector Participation in the<br />
Municipal Solid Waste Management Sector in Egypt was<br />
delivered in September 2010 and <strong>cover</strong>ed: policy and<br />
legal framework, fiscal and economic impacts, social<br />
issues, market conditions, capacity, contract structuring<br />
and procurement, and management. The analysis<br />
guides identification of lessons learnt for more efficient<br />
and effective private sector participation in MSWM.<br />
� The work is the basis for a Strategic Action Plan for<br />
private sector participation in MSWM in Egypt.<br />
3<br />
The activity is ongoing and it is too early<br />
to tell if there are outcomes. PPIAF will<br />
continue to monitor the results to capture<br />
the outcomes and impacts of this activity.<br />
2. South Africa: Independent Power Producer Regulatory Framework ($440,000): this activity was<br />
approved on December 28, 2009. Note that the activity was approved in advance of the establishment of<br />
the Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund, but the implementation of the activity only<br />
commenced after the non-core fund was launched. The activity will <strong>cover</strong>:<br />
� Review of the regulatory work products to date in the government's REFIT Programme, in<br />
particular the Amendments to the Electricity Regulation Act and the National Energy Regulator<br />
Act<br />
� Development of the regulatory environment for licensing<br />
� Review and recommend amendments to legislation relating to Independent Power Producers at<br />
the municipal level<br />
This is a recipient-executed activity by the PPP Unit in the National Treasury of South Africa. Its<br />
implementation was delayed until urgent issues within Eskom (South Africa's power utility) were resolved<br />
around the financing of an urgently needed major base-load power plant. This unavoidably meant a very<br />
slow start for the activity. The National Treasury finalized its evaluation of proposals and the selected<br />
consultant is mobilizing. This activity is ongoing and is expected to be completed by August 2012.<br />
3. Colombia: Support to Concession Agency (INCO) ($249,484): this activity was approved on<br />
February 28, 2011. The activity supported the government of Colombia to improve the planning,<br />
structuring, award process, implementation, management, and regulation of road infrastructure projects<br />
under the concession modality. The assistance concentrated on strengthening the capacity of the<br />
National Institute for Concessions (INCO) to deliver projects able to attract private investment. The activity<br />
recommended changes in the procedures from project preparation to contract management and the<br />
reforms are aimed to help the government to make investments more efficient and transparent. INCO is<br />
now embarked on an ambitious program to develop new projects mainly in roads, railroads, and airports.
Results to Date of the Activity for Support to INCO<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Diagnosis and assessment of existing<br />
concessions program<br />
� Assessment of National Procurement Law<br />
Policies prepared or legal or regulatory changes<br />
recommended<br />
� Guiding recommendations proposed for drafting<br />
National Concessions Law<br />
Plans/strategies prepared<br />
� Proposal defined for management strategy<br />
change for the INCO<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� On-the-job training on international best practice in<br />
PPPs<br />
Knowledge products disseminated<br />
� Notes on international best practice and lessons<br />
learned for Colombia<br />
4<br />
The activity was completed in February 2012. It<br />
is too early to report on many of the outcomes<br />
but PPIAF will continue to monitor results to<br />
capture the actual outcomes and impacts of this<br />
activity.<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� INCO staff with improved capacity in<br />
planning, structuring, award,<br />
implementation, management, and<br />
regulation of road concession contracts<br />
4. Vietnam: PPP Viability Study for the Ninh Bin–Than Hoa–Bai Vot Expressway ($500,000): this<br />
activity was approved on June 23, 2011. It supports the government of Vietnam to evaluate PPP options<br />
for the 220 kilometer Ninh Bin-Than Hoa-Bai Vot (NBBV) expressway section, which forms part of the<br />
Eastern North-South expressway linking Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Can Tho in the Mekong delta, a<br />
total length of 1,811 kilometers. This North-South expressway is the backbone of a planned national<br />
network and will serve the densely populated coastal area of Vietnam. NBBV is the next priority section,<br />
and the PPIAF activity will assess the viability of PPP arrangements, identify the best PPP model, and<br />
establish a standard practice guideline for leveraging private sector resources in expressway<br />
development. Implementation of the activity is underway, and the consultant (Halcrow) is engaged, albeit<br />
with some delays in this process. The current completion date of November 2012 will most likely need to<br />
be revised once the consultant is able to confirm the work schedule.<br />
5. Vietnam: Capacity Building to Review Waste-to-Energy Project Proposals in Ho Chi Minh City<br />
($75,000): this activity was approved on June 30, 2011. The activity supports the Department of Natural<br />
Resources and Environment of the People's Committee of Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) to evaluate the<br />
waste-to-energy project proposals it is considering. This activity will build the Department's capacity to<br />
assess proposed technologies, expected project costs, land use requirements, and the financial capacity<br />
of investors. The project finally selected will provide a cleaner option to the growing problem of solid<br />
waste management. The project will also generate 30 MW of energy to supplement the HCMC grid, which<br />
cannot currently meet growing demand from households and industries. Implementation of the activity is<br />
underway. No issues have been noted so far, and the activity is expected to be completed by June 2012.<br />
6. Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-Based Contracts for Road Maintenance<br />
($40,000): this activity was approved on October 17, 2011. It supports the government of Vietnam to<br />
analyze the current approach to performance-based contracts for road maintenance and to develop a<br />
plan to strengthen these contracts, including the application of relevant best practice from other countries
and the integration of performance-based road maintenance contracts into standard maintenance<br />
practices in Vietnam. Implementation of the activity is underway. No issues have been noted so far, and<br />
the activity is expected to be completed by May 2012.<br />
7. Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure ($75,000): this activity was approved on January 8,<br />
2012. The activity supports the government of Peru on improving the prospects for PPP in irrigation in the<br />
country in general and, more specifically, to provide recommendations on how to improve the<br />
Chavimochic PPP model in order to achieve a successful deal. The activity includes an analysis of the<br />
proposed Chavimochic III PPP model, which is based on the current model at Majes II. The analysis<br />
relies primarily on the existing feasibility studies. That activity is also reviewing the emergence and<br />
evolution of irrigation PPPs in Peru to better understand the political and social "forces" that have led to<br />
the current framework, its weaknesses and strengths, and that will have an impact on possible future<br />
changes. Implementation of the activity is underway. No issues have been noted so far, and the activity is<br />
expected to be completed by September 2013.<br />
8. Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income Housing Projects ($74,800): this activity<br />
was approved on March 4, 2012. It supports the government of Colombia in structuring and developing a<br />
―window‖ to evaluate and screen private Second Generation Macroproyectos. This activity will provide<br />
important support to the government to successfully harness private sector interest in developing the<br />
approximately 7,000 hectares of land identified under the Macroproyectos program. The ―window‖ would<br />
enable the transparent and competitive technical, environmental, social, and financial screening of private<br />
sub-projects that could be structured as PPPs, under which the government commits to providing a partial<br />
supply-side capital investment subsidy of no more than 40% of overall sub-project cost. The activity is<br />
developing a framework for government to analyze such private financing proposals. The activity has only<br />
recently been approved and is expected to be completed by October 2012.<br />
9. Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water Supply in Ghana (Phase 2) ($68,431):<br />
this activity was approved on March 11, 2012. It supports the government of Ghana to undertake a<br />
detailed analysis of the institutional, legal, and financial implications of different options identified by the<br />
government for institutional reform of the urban water sector, aiming to improve the performance and<br />
financial sustainability of the sector. It is seen that such reform will lead to the commercialization of the<br />
sector and increased private sector investment. The activity has only recently been approved and is<br />
expected to be completed by December 2012.<br />
10. South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg<br />
($74,820): this activity was approved on March 20, 2012. It supports the City of Johannesburg in South<br />
Africa to undertake an initial pre-feasibility study to determine the steps and projects that would make up<br />
a comprehensive, sustainable, and integrated cycling program for the city. This includes high-level<br />
options for private sector involvement in the delivery, management, and/or financing of such a program,<br />
including looking at the international experience of bike sharing schemes. The activity has only recently<br />
been approved and is expected to be completed by November 2012.<br />
11. Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID<br />
System for the Delivery of Public Services ($230,620): this activity was approved on March 29, 2012.<br />
It provides assistance to the government of Vietnam to formulate a sound infrastructure development<br />
strategy and build capacity in the design and execution of a PPP e-ID system. The activity is comprised of<br />
three major components: a PPP options study and recommendations; a series of capacity building<br />
activities; and knowledge dissemination. The activity has only recently been approved and is expected to<br />
be completed by April 2013.<br />
5
II. Looking Ahead<br />
There are a number of proposals in the pipeline for this Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund.<br />
Region Title Description Comments<br />
Africa South Africa: Water<br />
Sector<br />
East Asia<br />
and the<br />
Pacific<br />
Latin<br />
American<br />
and the<br />
Caribbean<br />
Vietnam: Pathways for<br />
Private Sector Energy<br />
Investments<br />
Peru: Potential PPP<br />
for Wastewater<br />
Treatment and Reuse<br />
in Ica<br />
Formulation of approaches to address acid<br />
mine drainage; exploring the technical,<br />
institutional, legal, economic, and financial<br />
implications associated with PPP options.<br />
Outcomes would include the reduction of<br />
mine water contribution to the salinity of major<br />
river systems, improvement in water security,<br />
and identification of financing mechanisms<br />
through the re-sale of treated water and<br />
re<strong>cover</strong>y of mineral bi-products re<strong>cover</strong>ed<br />
through the treatment and desalinization<br />
process.<br />
The state electricity utility EVN is facing a<br />
difficult financial situation, which is affecting<br />
its creditworthiness and ability to attract<br />
generation investors. The potential activity<br />
would prepare an action plan and financial<br />
forward looking assessment to improve the<br />
financial strength of EVN and its ability to be<br />
perceived as a credible buyer by private<br />
investors. This would include<br />
recommendations on tariff adjustment<br />
regulations and implementation. This would<br />
benefit not only EVN but also support its<br />
willingness to sign contracts with new<br />
renewable energy projects.<br />
The World Bank and IFC are working with the<br />
Peruvian Business Association of<br />
Manufacturing—Sociedad Nacional de<br />
Industrias (SNI)—on a potential application to<br />
examine the options for developing a<br />
concession to private operators of wastewater<br />
treatment and reuse solutions.<br />
6<br />
Under discussion.<br />
Under discussion.<br />
This had been previously<br />
identified and the<br />
stakeholders have reaffirmed<br />
their intent in<br />
January 2012. Discussions<br />
are still ongoing, and an<br />
application is seen as likely.
Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
Region Title Major Sector<br />
Middle East<br />
and North<br />
Africa<br />
Africa<br />
Latin America<br />
and the<br />
Caribbean<br />
East Asia and<br />
the Pacific<br />
East Asia and<br />
the Pacific<br />
East Asia and<br />
the Pacific<br />
Latin America<br />
and the<br />
Caribbean<br />
Latin America<br />
and the<br />
Caribbean<br />
Africa<br />
Africa<br />
East Asia and<br />
the Pacific<br />
Egypt: Improving Private Sector Participation in the<br />
Municipal Solid Waste Management Sector<br />
South Africa: Independent Power Producer Regulatory<br />
Framework<br />
7<br />
Approval<br />
Amount<br />
Approval<br />
Date<br />
Completion<br />
Date<br />
Status<br />
Solid Waste $250,000 2-Dec-09 30-Sep-12 Ongoing<br />
Energy $440,000 28-Dec-09 31-Aug-12 Ongoing<br />
Colombia: Support to Concession Agency (INCO) Transportation $249,484 16-Feb-11 28-Feb-12 Completed<br />
Vietnam: PPP Viability Study for the Ninh Bin-Than Hoa-<br />
Bai Vot Expressway<br />
Vietnam: Capacity Building to Review Waste-to-Energy<br />
Project Proposals in Ho Chi Minh City<br />
Vietnam: Strengthening of the Use of Performance-<br />
Based Contracts for Road Maintenance in Vietnam<br />
Transportation $500,000 23-Jun-11 30-Nov-12 Ongoing<br />
Energy $75,000 30-Jun-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />
Transportation $40,00 17-Oct-11 31-May-12 Ongoing<br />
Peru: PPP Options for Irrigation Infrastructure Irrigation $75,000 8-Jan-12 30-Sep-12 Ongoing<br />
Colombia: Private Financing Window for Low-Income<br />
Housing Projects<br />
Ghana: Institutional Options for Improving Urban Water<br />
Supply in Ghana (Phase 2)<br />
South Africa: Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program<br />
in the City of Johannesburg<br />
Vietnam: Feasibility Study and PPP Options for the<br />
Implementation of a Nation-Wide e-ID System for the<br />
Delivery of Public Services<br />
Multi-sector $74,800 4-Mar-12 31-Oct-12 Ongoing<br />
Water $68,431 11-Mar-12 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />
Transportation $74,820 20-Mar-12 30-Nov-12 Ongoing<br />
Telecommunications $230,620 29-Mar-12 30-Apr-13 Ongoing
Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Middle-Income Countries Non-Core<br />
Trust Fund<br />
Trust Fund: 71453 - PPIAF Middle-Income Countries - Status as of 03/31/12<br />
Description<br />
Contribution receipts<br />
Add:<br />
Financial information summary (inception to date)<br />
8<br />
Amount in $<br />
7,822,339<br />
Investment income 52,720<br />
Total Income (A)<br />
Less:<br />
7,875,059<br />
Administration fee 2% 156,447<br />
Disbursements made for the approved, ongoing activities 1,622,298<br />
Program Management Unit (PMU) administration expenses*<br />
Funds committed and pending to be disbursed to the task teams by PMU for the ongoing<br />
activities<br />
Total disbursements (B)<br />
Net fund balance (C) = (A) - (B)<br />
List of approved activities to be created in SAP (D)<br />
740,000<br />
328,431<br />
2,847,176<br />
5,027,883<br />
Pre-feasibility Study for a Cycling Program in the City of Johannesburg 74,820<br />
Pipeline (E)<br />
PMU costs - additional funds to be allocated 433,351<br />
Fund balance available for new commitments (F) = (C) - (D) - (E) 4,519,712<br />
Add:<br />
Contribution receipts anticipated<br />
(a) Received, but yet to be accounted -<br />
(b) To be received within the next 3 months -<br />
(c) To be received in the next 12 months -<br />
Total receipts anticipated<br />
* PMU Costs:<br />
15% equivalent of contributions received to date<br />
End disbursement date 12/31/2013<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1,173,351
PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response<br />
to the Global Financial Crisis<br />
April 2012
Overview<br />
Table of Contents<br />
I. Regional and Global Activities Funded through PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response to<br />
Global Financial Crisis<br />
1. Feasibility Study for a Middle East and North Africa Islamic Finance Facility for Infrastructure<br />
2. Assessment of Chinese Industrial Zones in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Mauritius<br />
3. Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways<br />
4. Addressing the Challenge of Doing PPPs in Specific Sectors in the Black Sea Region, the<br />
Caucasus, and Central Asia<br />
5. PPP Forum for Accelerating Infrastructure Development in Transport for Francophone Africa<br />
6. Rapid Needs Assessments and Helpdesk Service<br />
7. PPP Workshop Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Recent African Case Studies<br />
8. PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center (PPPIRC) website<br />
II. Country-Specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-Core Trust<br />
Fund<br />
1. India: Preparation of a Business Plan for India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />
2. Ethiopia: PPP Irrigation Model Contracts<br />
3. Sri Lanka: Facilitating PPPs for Infrastructure Development<br />
4. Paraguay: Support for the Design of River Navigation Concessions—Phase II<br />
5. India: Support for Assessment of Public and Private Investment in Infrastructure During the<br />
Financial Crisis<br />
6. India: PPP Options Study for Wastewater Management in Delhi Jal Board<br />
7. India: Review and Analysis of the Proposed Regulatory Framework for the Ports and Airports<br />
Sectors<br />
8. Azerbaijan: National Solid Waste Management Performance Improvement and Private Sector<br />
Participation Strategy<br />
9. Morocco: PPP Unit Support<br />
10. Cambodia: Developing the Universal Access and Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector<br />
11. Turkmenistan: Enhancing Private Sector Participation at the Port of Turkmenbashi<br />
12. Djibouti: Improving the Regulation of Private Operators in the Ports Sector<br />
13. Kenya: PPP Unit Support<br />
14. Rwanda: Independent Review of Energy Generation Investments<br />
15. Uganda: Technical Assistance to Prepare PPP Pipeline<br />
16. Bhutan: Improving the Capacity of the Government to Implement Infrastructure PPPs<br />
17. Malawi: Transaction Advice on Concession Renegotiation of the Railways<br />
18. Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment<br />
19. Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap<br />
20. Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower<br />
Plants<br />
21. Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects Under a PPP<br />
22. Gabon: PPP Program<br />
III. Looking Ahead<br />
Annexes<br />
Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded through the PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-Core<br />
Trust Fund<br />
Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
2
Overview<br />
At the onset of the global financial crisis in the second half of 2008, public-private partnerships (PPPs) in<br />
infrastructure were seeing encouraging trends: private investments had become more evenly distributed<br />
across sectors instead of being concentrated in the more profitable telecommunications sector; and<br />
geographically, larger shares were going to low-income countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and<br />
South Asia. However, when the global financial crisis struck, these trends were disrupted. Some<br />
regions—particularly Eastern Europe and Central Asia—have seen a fall in investments by as much as<br />
40% 1 with a number of projects being delayed or at risk of being cancelled. Higher costs of financing and<br />
the decline of private investors’ risk appetite were a significant cause of these delays and uncertainties.<br />
By end-2009, overall private activity in infrastructure declined.<br />
In 2010 the governments of the Swiss Confederation and the United Kingdom provided funding to PPIAF<br />
for a non-core trust fund for technical assistance to help countries deal with specific problems related to<br />
the global financial crisis. Thirty activities received total funding of $4,269,710 from the PPIAF Non-Core<br />
Trust Fund as a Response to the Global Financial Crisis, with the majority currently under<br />
implementation. These activities aimed at:<br />
� Finding bankable and sustainable solutions in PPPs, taking into account the lessons learned from<br />
the financial crisis<br />
� Supporting governments in developing project pipelines, particularly those that were further left<br />
lagging as a consequence of constrained funding<br />
� Improving the institutional capacity of governments in designing, preparing, and implementing<br />
PPPs to help them be credible counterparts to potential private investors and/or operators<br />
These are important interventions to support PPPs in a post-crisis world where private resources are<br />
scarce and investors have become highly selective. Annex 1 contains the pipeline of these activities,<br />
and Annex 2 provides a statement of funding for this trust fund.<br />
I. Regional and Global Activities Funded through PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as Response to<br />
the Global Financial Crisis<br />
Since 2009 PPIAF has supported eight regional and global activities:<br />
1. Feasibility Study for a Middle East and North Africa Islamic Finance Facility for Infrastructure<br />
($395,000): the activity was approved on February 2, 2010. It conducted a feasibility study to guide the<br />
design and establishment of a sharia-compliant facility, the Arab Financing Facility for Infrastructure<br />
(AFFI), which will enable the financing of cross-border infrastructure projects in the region and provide<br />
technical assistance to client governments to prepare bankable projects. The recommendations of the<br />
study were adopted by key stakeholders, and the facility was subsequently set up and formally launched<br />
at a PPP conference held in Jordan from April 2–6, 2011. The event was attended by delegates from<br />
Arab League countries, as well as development partners such as the World Bank and the Islamic<br />
Development Bank. The AFFI Technical Assistance Window was officially signed and also launched as<br />
part of the conference.<br />
1 PPI Database data update note 42, December 2010<br />
3
Results of the Feasibility Study of Arab Islamic Finance Facility Activity<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Feasibility study of the Arab Financing<br />
Facility for Infrastructure (AFFI),<br />
September 2010<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� PPP workshop and launch of AFFI, April<br />
2011<br />
Institutions created or strengthened<br />
� AFFI launched in April 2011<br />
Consensus achieved and awareness enhanced<br />
� Consensus achieved on the set-up and launch of the<br />
AFFI<br />
� Awareness enhanced on PPPs and the new shariahcompliant<br />
facility, AFFI<br />
2. Assessment of Chinese Industrial Zones in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Mauritius ($99,086): the<br />
activity was approved on June 17, 2010. PPIAF support was mobilized to help address the infrastructure<br />
needs for the four Industrial Zones (Nigeria – Lekki, Nigeria – Ogun, Mauritius – Jinfei Economic and<br />
Trade Cooperation Zone, and Ethiopia – Oriental) by estimating the infrastructural gap that needs to be<br />
fulfilled before the four zones were able to operate. The studies identified possible opportunities for<br />
infrastructure provision by the private sector and the necessary policy framework and enabling<br />
environment that needs to be in place to ensure effective PPP implementation. The work was discussed<br />
with governments, and counterparts in Nigeria and Ethiopia have expressed interest in seeking<br />
assistance from the World Bank Group on the implementation of zone projects in areas such as policy,<br />
legal, regulatory, and institutional frameworks for the development, management, and regulation of<br />
zones; models for public financing; and PPP arrangements for external infrastructure for zones. Mauritius<br />
is also keen to share its successful experience in zone development with other Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
countries, potentially in partnership with other countries. The activity was completed in December 2010<br />
and concrete outcomes are still forthcoming.<br />
3. Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways ($350,000): the updated<br />
and improved Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways (―Highways Toolkit‖) was developed in 2009 by<br />
the World Bank with PPIAF support. Increased demand for PPPs in the roads subsector in Russianspeaking<br />
countries (or where Russian is a major language) indicates the need to facilitate access to the<br />
Highways Toolkit for key stakeholders in those countries. This has become particularly important after the<br />
onset of the global financial crisis, which led to a ―flight to quality‖ of potential investors, and a slowdown<br />
of private participation in infrastructure in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia region, which had been<br />
previously booming. All this makes it all the more important for countries to have a solid pipeline of wellprepared<br />
projects, and a clear strategy on how to attract private investors. The Highways Toolkit was<br />
available only in English at that time. On June 29, 2010, PPIAF provided funding to translate the<br />
Highways Toolkit in Russian for all interested parties (e.g., governments, academia, the private sector,<br />
NGOs) for developing and transitioning economies where Russian is a major language. The activity was<br />
recently completed in early May 2011, and the toolkit will soon be available on the World Bank’s transport<br />
website and on the PPIAF homepage. An initial dissemination workshop was held in Kiev, Ukraine on<br />
April 12, 2011. Apart from introducing the Highways Toolkit to participants, the workshop gave an<br />
opportunity for participants from both the government and private sectors to exchange experiences and<br />
good practices as well as explore lessons learned internationally. The workshop was attended by 38<br />
participants.<br />
4
Results of the Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in Roads and Highways<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Knowledge products disseminated<br />
� Russian version of the Toolkit for PPPs in<br />
Roads and Highways, April 2011<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� Dissemination workshop held in Kiev, Ukraine<br />
on April 12, 2011<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� Successfully completed and initially<br />
disseminated in Kiev, Ukraine on April 12, 2011<br />
� Enhanced understanding of 38 participants on<br />
PPPs in highways<br />
4. Addressing the Challenge of Doing PPPs in Specific Sectors in the Black Sea Region, the<br />
Caucasus, and Central Asia ($35,500): the activity was approved on November 16, 2010. The PPIAF<br />
grant facilitated the attendance of 12 representatives in the capacity building event on PPPs, which took<br />
place in Istanbul, Turkey. The request came in light of the need to strengthen the institutional capacity to<br />
undertake PPPs, which was especially acute in the aftermath of the financial crisis, because Eastern<br />
Europe has been one of the regions most affected by the downturn of private financing resources and<br />
decrease activity of private investors.<br />
The workshop was held in Istanbul, Turkey on December 15–19, 2010. Around 50 participants attended<br />
from several countries from the Central Asia, the Caucasus, and the Black Sea regions. A majority of the<br />
participants were members of PPP units in their respective countries, but there were also some<br />
representatives of the private sector from these countries. The workshop helped improve understanding<br />
of PPPs and the issues discussed in the event: risk sharing and sustainable financing of PPPs. These<br />
were of equal relevance to all countries participating in the seminar given a big majority were at the early<br />
stages of developing and implementing their PPP programs.<br />
Results of the Capacity Building Activity on PPPs in Eastern Europe and Central Asia<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� Seminar in Istanbul, Turkey on Addressing the<br />
Challenge of Doing PPPs in Specific Sectors<br />
in the Black Sea Region, the Caucasus, and<br />
Central Asia, December 15–19, 2010<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� Improved awareness and understanding of 50<br />
participants from the Central Asia and Black<br />
Sea Region on PPPs<br />
5. PPP Forum for Accelerating Infrastructure Development in Transport for Francophone Africa<br />
($70,000): this activity was approved in January 2011. The PPIAF grant supported a Regional Forum on<br />
PPP in Transport Infrastructure: Fostering Infrastructure Development in Francophone Africa in Yaoundé,<br />
Caméroun on April 23–29, 2011. The Forum was co-sponsored by the World Bank, the World Bank<br />
Institute, and the Club PPP MedAfrique, in collaboration with the government of Cameroun. The Regional<br />
PPP Forum provided a platform for high-level delegates from Francophone countries in Africa to share<br />
knowledge and exchange good practices and emerging lessons regarding the design and implementation<br />
of PPPs in the region. Around 130 people attended, representing 17 countries in Francophone Africa:<br />
Benin, Burundi, Rwanda, Central African Republic, Congo Brazza, Congo DRC, Mali, Burkina Faso,<br />
Gabon, Chad, Niger, Guinea, Equatorial Guinea, Madagascar, Mauritius, and Mauritania.<br />
5
Results of the PPP Transport Forum in Francophone Africa<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� Forum on PPP in Transport Infrastructure<br />
in Francophone Africa, April 23–29, 2010<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� Improved awareness and understanding of 130<br />
participants from the Francophone Africa on transport<br />
infrastructure PPPs<br />
6. Rapid Needs Assessments and Help Desk Service ($300,000): this activity was approved on<br />
March 10, 2011. The activity was undertaken in response to governments who needed an immediate<br />
analysis of various options available to them in developing PPPs. This activity will provide a quick<br />
intervention to guide senior level government officials in making a decision for more targeted technical<br />
assistance in the sector. An initial rapid assessment was undertaken to determine options for urban water<br />
supply in Ghana. The options identified were developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders and<br />
discussed with the Minister of Water Resources, Works, and Housing in Accra on October 21, 2011. In<br />
December 2011 the government selected three of the options, which focus on strengthening the<br />
governance and performance of the sector by considering different institutional arrangements and<br />
contractual relationships between the main parties, for detailed analysis. The government has requested<br />
further support for the analysis of these preliminary options. A second intervention for the activity consists<br />
of providing technical assistance through a helpdesk, staffed by experts, to PPP units to build capacity to<br />
develop, implement, and manage PPP projects. The helpdesk is currently being carried out as a pilot<br />
project with Uganda’s privatization unit. There are no outputs and outcomes at this moment as the activity<br />
is still underway. The helpdesk has been in operation since April 2011.<br />
7. PPP Workshop Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Recent African Case Studies<br />
($75,000): this activity was approved on March 30, 2011 and aims to co-finance a workshop to create<br />
awareness to African governments on the realities in PPPs and best practices particularly in the aftermath<br />
of the global financial crisis. There has been a widespread recognition in African countries of the benefits<br />
of private market financing of, and participation in, infrastructure projects. This has been driven largely by<br />
factors such as austere budgetary constraints that have limited the public sector’s ability to meet<br />
increasing infrastructure needs and consumer demand for reliable and efficient services. Perhaps, more<br />
importantly, success stories across Africa have encouraged a number of governments to consider a<br />
change in socio-economic paradigm from the traditional welfare state to one where the user pays for<br />
infrastructure services. However, the African dilemma is that governments are constantly faced with<br />
decisions regarding PPPs, but enthusiasm is usually curbed by factors such as the lack of information<br />
about best practices, absence of PPP skills and capacity to properly manage PPP processes, and the<br />
inadequate regulatory and institutional framework. The workshop seeks to bridge the gap between PPP<br />
theory and PPP best practices and was held in Nigeria in November 2011. Government and private<br />
sector stakeholders and practitioners from several African countries including Kenya, Burundi, Southern<br />
Sudan, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Liberia, Cameroun, Senegal, and Gabon attended.<br />
Results of the PPP Best Practices Workshop in Africa<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� Africa: PPP Workshop Best Practices<br />
and Lessons Learned, November 14–15,<br />
2011<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� Improved awareness and understanding of<br />
participants from Africa on best practices and recent<br />
experience of African countries on PPPs<br />
6
8. PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center (PPIRC) website ($332,000) 2 : approved on June 24,<br />
2011, this activity will help the PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center website to enhance its existing<br />
resources—particularly on up-to-date information related to the effects of the global financial crisis on the<br />
PPP contracts. The website, launched in 2009, makes practical PPP infrastructure related resources<br />
publicly available to governments, particularly in the developing world, to assist them with the legal and<br />
contractual issues arising from these complex projects. An assessment of reports, terms of references,<br />
and other relevant references for the website is expected to be completed by May 31, 2012.<br />
II. Country-specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Response to Financial Crisis Non-<br />
Core Trust Fund<br />
In addition to regional activities, PPIAF supported 22 country-specific activities:<br />
1. India: Preparation of a Business Plan for India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />
($218,000): approved on December 1, 2009, this activity aims to help the Infrastructure Finance<br />
Company Limited (IIFCL) update its business plan in the context of market realities following the global<br />
financial and economic slowdown and the PPP financing needs in India. The government of India<br />
established the IIFCL in 2006 under a scheme for financing of infrastructure projects, with a focus on<br />
infrastructure projects domiciled as special purpose vehicles (SPV) and promoted by the private and<br />
public sectors. The IIFCL has been incorporated as a public financial institution designed to borrow in<br />
domestic markets as well as from multilateral financial institutions for on-lending to infrastructure SPV<br />
projects. However, the IIFCL was falling short on capacity in terms of people, processes, and systems for<br />
addressing this rapidly evolving role, which inter alia involves managing complex borrowings from<br />
domestic and international markets and multilateral institutions, and deployment through an increasing<br />
complex set of structures and products. The PPIAF activity aimed at helping the IIFCL to evolve from its<br />
present role, and introduce innovating financing instruments to address the challenge of infrastructure<br />
project financing in India. A market assessment report and business plan for IIFCL was developed in<br />
December 2011 under the PPIAF activity.<br />
Results from Support to the India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform Capacity and awareness building<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Assessment report for infrastructure finance<br />
market, December 2011 Technical capacity enhanced<br />
Plans/strategies prepared<br />
� Business plan for the India Infrastructure<br />
Finance Company Limited prepared,<br />
December 2011<br />
� India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited<br />
strengthened, 2011<br />
2. Ethiopia: PPP Irrigation Model Contracts ($349,000): the activity was approved on February 3,<br />
2010 and is considered a follow-up activity to an earlier PPIAF grant which helped the government of<br />
Ethiopia determine options in delivering irrigation services. An innovative PPP option has been selected<br />
by the government for implementation on a pilot basis. The approach included charging farmers an<br />
Irrigation Service Fee for the full cost of operation and maintenance of the irrigation system—including<br />
energy costs—thereby contributing to making the system financially sustainable. However, in light of the<br />
changes to capital markets and the perception of risk arising from the financial crisis, additional support<br />
was requested to fine-tune the PPP arrangements. The work included drafting the prequalification<br />
2 From the total approved amount of $332,000, only $282,000 has been funded from the SECO/DFID Financial Crisis<br />
non-core fund. The rest of the $50,000 is funded from the Multi-Donor Core Trust Fund<br />
7
documents, information memorandum, model bidding documents, and a model transaction agreement for<br />
the Megech (Lake Tana) irrigation project. The PPP irrigation project at Megech is currently at the bidding<br />
stage. Once implemented, this project is expected to irrigate 5,000 hectares of land, benefitting 10,000<br />
farmers.<br />
Results of the PPP Irrigation Model Contracts in Ethiopia<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Draft prequalification documents,<br />
information memorandum, model bidding<br />
documents, and transaction agreement for<br />
Megech irrigation project, 2011<br />
� Bids have been solicited for a management<br />
contract for the Megech irrigation project, 2011.<br />
The Megech pilot project will irrigate 5,000<br />
hectares of land, benefitting 10,000 farmers<br />
through increased crop yields and productivity<br />
3. Sri Lanka: Facilitating PPPs for Infrastructure Development ($290,000): this activity was<br />
approved on April 29, 2010. PPPs in Sri Lanka are relatively new, with the exception of few Independent<br />
Power Producers and the Colombo Port, but are nevertheless growing in strategic importance for the<br />
government in its plans of infrastructure development. This is of particular importance in the North and<br />
East, where the population is re<strong>cover</strong>ing from decades of conflict and investment shortfalls. The PPP Unit<br />
housed in the Board of Investment of Sri Lanka has been tasked with monitoring and managing the<br />
pipeline of new PPP projects in an effort to respond to the financial crisis, and has received a number of<br />
proposals for such projects. The PPP Unit has been recently formed and currently has only limited<br />
experience and technical capacity. PPIAF provided grant funding to assist the central PPP Unit to identify<br />
any gaps in the legal and regulatory framework in Sri Lanka to develop and implement PPP projects,<br />
specifically in view of the changes in best practice PPPs following the global economic and financial<br />
crisis. It will also help the PPP Unit’s capacity to undertake proper feasibility study for a PPP project,<br />
specifically on a waste management facility in the Western Province of Sri Lanka, and in the overall<br />
project development, monitoring, and oversight of PPPs. The activity has been delayed in implementation<br />
and will be closely monitored by the Program Management Unit.<br />
4. Paraguay: Support for the Design of River Navigation Concessions—Phase II ($168,000): this<br />
PPIAF activity was approved on May 19, 2010. It provided the technical, legal, and economic conditions<br />
of the Pilcomayo-Formosa segment of the Paraguay River and developed the final bidding documents<br />
that will serve as a structure for the future river concession. This activity builds on a Phase I study of the<br />
Rio Apa-Pilcomayo segment of the river. Outcomes are pending as activity recently closed.<br />
5. India: Support for Assessment of Public and Private Investment in Infrastructure During the<br />
Financial Crisis ($47,950): approved on July 27, 2010, the activity’s aim is to review and assess the flow<br />
of economic resources during the financial crisis to Indian infrastructure projects and the impact of the<br />
crisis on progress towards India’s 2007–2012 economic plan. The government later decided to cancel this<br />
activity as an advisory firm, McKinsey, offered to undertake the assessment at no cost.<br />
6. India: PPP Options Study for Wastewater Management in Delhi Jal Board ($168,000): the<br />
activity was approved on August 4, 2010. Contending with the reduced risk appetite of the private sector<br />
in the aftermath of the financial crisis, private sector interest was limited to the power and<br />
telecommunications sectors. The creation of new infrastructure assets—namely in the wastewater<br />
sector—lagged in comparison to other sectors. To keep up the pace of capital investments across these<br />
sectors, the Delhi Jal Board requested assistance from PPIAF to undertake an options study to outline<br />
the various PPP options available to the city to improve its wastewater management for both current and<br />
8
planned activities, and facilitate the bid process to appoint project consultants for implementing such<br />
projects. Implementation of the activity is still ongoing.<br />
Results of PPP Options Study for Wastewater Management in Delhi Jal Board<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Delhi Jal Board Wastewater Management<br />
PPP Options Study, 2011<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� Stakeholder workshops to present the<br />
findings of the PPP options report, June 8,<br />
2011<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� Technical capacity of the Delhi Jal Board<br />
enhanced, 2011<br />
7. India: Review and Analysis of the Proposed Regulatory Framework for the Ports and Airports<br />
Sectors in India ($65,000): approved on August 4, 2010, this activity helped the government of India<br />
review and analyze i) the draft Major Ports Regulatory Authority Act and ii) the consultation paper<br />
―Regulatory Philosophy and Approach in Economic Regulation of Airports and Air Navigation Services,‖<br />
circulated by the Airport Economic Regulatory Authority to ensure they are consistent with international<br />
best practice, appropriately adapted to the local context as well as market realities after the global<br />
financial crisis, and directed towards ensuring efficient, competitive, and effective operation of the ports<br />
and airports sectors.<br />
Results of Analysis of Proposed Regulatory Framework for Ports and Airports<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform Capacity and awareness building<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Regulation of Indian Port Sector report,<br />
2011<br />
� Assessment of the Regulatory Philosophy of<br />
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of<br />
India, 2011<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� Technical capacity of the Ministry of Roads,<br />
Transport, and Highways enhanced, 2011<br />
� Technical capacity of the Airport Economic<br />
Regulatory Authority enhanced, 2011<br />
8. Azerbaijan: National Solid Waste Management Performance Improvement and Private Sector<br />
Participation Strategy ($74,950): approved on December 6, 2010, this activity aims to assist the<br />
government of Azerbaijan in developing a national strategy for integrated solid waste management. The<br />
PPIAF-funded work is envisaged to provide policy recommendations for improving solid waste<br />
management infrastructure, service levels, and financial sustainability through various options, including<br />
private sector participation. Implementation of the activity is still ongoing.<br />
9. Morocco: PPP Unit Support ($245,700): this activity was approved on December 30, 2010 and is<br />
still under implementation. The request for PPIAF funding came in light of the impact of the global<br />
financial crisis on the ability of the government of Morocco to finance critical infrastructure investments.<br />
PPIAF support compliments the IFC PPP advisory role to the government and will specifically aim to help<br />
i) design and establish a dedicated PPP unit within the Directorate for State Enterprises and Privatization<br />
and strengthen the Directorate’s PPP expertise via the organization of seminars, and ii) identify pilot<br />
9
transactions. A number of reports were undertaken under the activity which led to noteworthy initial<br />
outcomes, specifically the establishment of a Moroccan PPP unit in May 2011.<br />
Results of Support to the Morocco PPP Unit<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Review of Legal/Institutional Framework, 2011<br />
� Analysis of Tools for Public and Private<br />
Financing of PPP Infra Projects, 2011<br />
� Analysis of Administrative Constraints to PPP<br />
Projects, 2011<br />
� International Benchmarking of PPP Unit, 2011<br />
Plans/strategies prepared<br />
� PPP unit functions and organization plan<br />
Project cycle-related assistance<br />
Transaction support<br />
� Report from rapid screening missions to<br />
identify pilot PPP transactions in the health<br />
sector, 2011<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� PPP Seminar held in February 2011 to build<br />
consensus between the Moroccan Ministry of<br />
Finance and all interested line ministries on<br />
the role of the PPP unit<br />
Institutions created or strengthened<br />
� Moroccan PPP Unit (part of the Ministry of<br />
Finance) created in May 2011<br />
Plans/strategies adopted<br />
� PPP unit functions and organization plan<br />
adopted<br />
Consensus achieved<br />
� Consensus achieved on role of PPP Unit, May<br />
2011<br />
10. Cambodia: Developing the Universal Access and Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector<br />
($110,000): this activity was approved on December 31, 2010 and aims to assist the Ministry of Posts<br />
and Telecommunications of Cambodia in developing a universal access/service (UAS)<br />
telecommunications policy framework. Though telecommunications continue to be an attractive sector to<br />
investors even in a constrained environment brought by the effects of the global financial crisis, providing<br />
services to remote rural areas are considered daunting. This activity is expected to provide a platform for<br />
the government of Cambodia to bridge the urban-rural divide and an opportunity to extend the gains to<br />
those who are most in need. The PPIAF activity recently closed and the work that was undertaken<br />
revealed that affordability constraints would need to be taken into account in developing Cambodia’s UAS<br />
framework, especially the potential set-up of a universal access fund, which is normally used for<br />
infrastructure supply. As a result, the scope of the PPIAF-funded work has been narrowed down to look at<br />
the feasibility of telecenters as part of the UAS strategy and identify initiatives that would reduce the<br />
service price paid by the consumers (including public institutions) and review elements of the existing<br />
regulatory regime that impact affordability and usage.<br />
11. Turkmenistan: Enhancing Private Sector Participation at the Port of Turkmenbashi ($150,000):<br />
this activity was approved on January 19, 2011 and is currently under implementation. The Port of<br />
Turkmenbashi is the primary port in Turkmenistan, and hence has a significant role in that it could<br />
enhance and sustain economic growth in the country. Because of its geographic location, the Port of<br />
Turkmenbashi could serve as a major logistics center linking Asian and Western markets. To achieve this<br />
goal, the government of Turkmenistan requested PPIAF support to help them engage the private sector<br />
to provide management experience, connections to the global maritime network, and shoulder some<br />
commercial, financial, and operational risks in transforming the Port. The PPIAF activity will undertake i)<br />
10
an assessment and recommendations for introducing PPPs in the Port of Turkmenbashi, and ii) provide<br />
recommendations on the revision of the Port Law.<br />
12. Djibouti: Improving the Regulation of Private Operators in the Ports Sector ($74,500): approved<br />
on February 14, 2011, this activity aims to strengthen the competitiveness of the ports of Djibouti (old port<br />
of Djibouti and new port of Doraleh) and ensure their medium- and long-term development by designing a<br />
modern and efficient regulation system for private port operators, and specifically addressing issues<br />
related to the quality of service and pricing, in addition to institutional related issues. Progress has been<br />
delayed due to change in government counterpart and the government’s decision to take back the<br />
management of the old port due to a strain in the relationship with the existing port contractor.<br />
13. Kenya: PPP Unit Support ($124,240): the activity was approved on February 23, 2011. At the<br />
request of the government, a PPIAF activity is currently providing advice and support to the PPP<br />
Secretariat in Kenya in fulfillment of its mandate to ministries, departments, and government agencies to<br />
identify and develop PPP projects; and helping contracting authorities review the work of PPP transaction<br />
advisors. This support will include the PPP Unit’s coordination of PPP information dissemination, training<br />
and capacity building, as well as the development of the PPP institutional procedures, including a revised<br />
PPP Guidance Manual. The work has been delayed and no outputs and outcomes are yet available.<br />
14. Rwanda: Independent Review of Energy Generation Investments ($74,500): this activity was<br />
approved on February 28, 2011. PPIAF funding was requested to help the government of Rwanda<br />
identify priority generation projects to be able to establish a pipeline of commercially-sound energy<br />
generation investments that can be undertaken through a PPP. The activity is currently under<br />
implementation. A diagnostic report was prepared and a list of priority generation projects was<br />
recommended. Since the activity has just recently been concluded, concrete outcomes have not yet been<br />
attained.<br />
15. Uganda: Technical Assistance to Prepare PPP Pipeline ($70,000): approved on April 7, 2011, this<br />
activity will help identify and prioritize potential PPP projects that can be implemented by the government<br />
of Uganda. The activity is still under implementation and will compliment the ongoing helpdesk activity<br />
where Uganda is the pilot country for the project.<br />
16. Bhutan: Improving the Capacity of the Government to Implement Infrastructure PPPs<br />
($167,450): this activity was approved on June 30, 2011. This ongoing PPIAF activity will help assess<br />
Bhutan’s capacity needs with respect to infrastructure PPP development and propose a roadmap for<br />
improved PPP capability in Bhutan.<br />
17. Malawi: Transaction Advice on Concession Renegotiation of the Railways ($166,156): the<br />
activity was approved on June 30, 2011 and is currently under implementation. The activity will review the<br />
current railway concession, propose modifications accordingly, and frame it in such away to ensure<br />
positive involvement of the concessionaire and assist the government of Malawi in the renegotiation of<br />
the concession agreement for the Malawi Railway Network. The PPIAF activity will also advise the Malawi<br />
government on rail infrastructure, commercial, regulatory, and financial aspects of the proposed<br />
concession for Railway Extension from Nkaya to Mwanza by Vale.<br />
18. Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment ($459,275): approved on October 24, 2011, this activity will<br />
assist the government of Djibouti to refine its energy sector master plan, asses the cost of refurbishing<br />
existing generation plants, and identify least-cost infrastructure investments that can be effectively<br />
financed and managed through a PPP. Implementation of this activity is still ongoing.<br />
11
19. Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap ($75,000): this ongoing activity was approved on<br />
October 30, 2011. This activity will develop a strategic policy roadmap to guide the development of<br />
Bhutan's telecom sector specifically in introducing competition, determining the divestment policies to<br />
promote strategic investment by foreign investors, and developing a transformation agenda to use the<br />
telecom sector for cost-effective service delivery.<br />
20. Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica 2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower<br />
Plants ($75,000): this activity was approved on December 15, 2011. IFC recently signed a mandate with<br />
the government of Albania to act as a lead advisor for privatization of four existing hydropower plants:<br />
Bistrica 1 (25MW) and Bistrica 2 (5 MW) on River Bistrica, and Ulza (25.2MW) and Shkopeti (25MW) on<br />
River Mati. In light of this transaction, the government requested PPIAF support to undertake additional<br />
assessments to maximize privatization proceeds from the sale of the hydropower plants and attract<br />
credible investors. An environmental assessment of the project to identify any environmental risks<br />
stemming and propose mitigation measures will be undertaken under the PPIAF activity, along with<br />
technical diagnostics on the conditions of the civil, mechanical, hydraulic, and electrical components of<br />
the hydropower plants.<br />
21. Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure Projects Under a PPP Model ($64,450):<br />
this activity was approved on January 12, 2012. The Royal Government of Bhutan is currently<br />
implementing its 10 th Five-Year Plan (10FYP, 2008–2013) which has a central focus on poverty reduction<br />
and envisages a wider role for the private sector in the implementation of its development goals. The<br />
PPIAF activity will undertake a preliminary assessment of potential infrastructure projects to develop a<br />
pipeline of feasible PPP transactions, including preparing a preliminary assessment of the feasibility of<br />
several infrastructure projects.<br />
22. Gabon: PPP Program ($74,640): approved on February 7, 2012, this activity will enable the<br />
government of Gabon to advance its PPP agenda from both a transaction and enabling environment<br />
stand point. Specifically, it will assess and recommend improvements in Gabon’s PPPs pipeline, provide<br />
targeted policy recommendations on improving the legal, regulatory, and institutional and policy<br />
arrangements, and present options for creating the institutional and human expertise on PPPs either<br />
through the establishment of a PPP unit or an inter-institutional commission.<br />
12
Annex 1: Approved Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a Response to the Global<br />
Financial Crisis<br />
Region Title Major Sector<br />
South Asia<br />
Middle East &<br />
North Africa<br />
India: Preparation of a Business Plan for India<br />
Infrastructure Finance Company Limited (IIFCL)<br />
Middle East and North Africa: Feasibility Study for<br />
MENA Islamic Finance Facility for Infrastructure<br />
13<br />
Approval<br />
Amount<br />
Approval<br />
Date<br />
Completion<br />
Date<br />
Status<br />
Multi-sector $218,000 1-Dec-09 30-Dec-11 Completed<br />
Multi-sector $395,000 2-Feb-10 30-Sep-11 Completed<br />
Africa Ethiopia: PPP Irrigation Model Contracts Water $74, 923 3-Feb-10 30-Sep-10 Completed<br />
South Asia<br />
Latin America &<br />
the Caribbean<br />
Africa<br />
Global<br />
South Asia<br />
South Asia<br />
South Asia<br />
Europe and<br />
Central Asia<br />
Europe and<br />
Central Asia<br />
Middle East &<br />
North Africa<br />
East Asia &<br />
Pacific<br />
Sri Lanka: Facilitating PPPs for Infrastructure<br />
Development<br />
Paraguay: Support for the Design of River Navigation<br />
Concessions – Phase II<br />
Africa: Assessment of Chinese Industrial Zones in<br />
Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Mauritius<br />
Global: Russian Translation of the Toolkit for PPPs in<br />
Roads and Highways<br />
India: Support for Assessment of Public and Private<br />
Investment in Infrastructure During the Financial Crisis<br />
India: PPP Options Study for Waste Water<br />
Management in Delhi Jal Board<br />
India: Review and Analysis of the Proposed<br />
Regulatory Framework for the Ports and Airports<br />
sector in India<br />
Europe and Central Asia: Addressing the Challenge of<br />
doing PPPs in Specific Sectors in the Black Sea<br />
Region, the Caucasus, and Central Asia<br />
Azerbaijan: National Solid Waste Management<br />
Performance Improvement and Private Sector<br />
Participation Strategy<br />
Multi-sector $290,000 29-Apr-10 15-Jan-13 Ongoing<br />
Transportation $186,000 19-May-10 30-Sep-10 Completed<br />
Multi-sector $99,086 17-Jun-10 31-Dec-10 Completed<br />
Transportation $20,000 29-Jun-10 30-Nov-11 Completed<br />
Multi-sector $47,950 27-Jul-10 30-Jun-11 Cancelled<br />
Water $73,390 4-Aug-10 31-Oct-11 Completed<br />
Transportation $65,000 4-Aug-10 30-Jun-11 Completed<br />
Multi-sector $35,500 16-Nov-10 30-Apr-11 Completed<br />
Water $74,950 6-Dec-10 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />
Morocco: PPP Unit Support Multi-sector $245,700 30-Dec-10 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />
Cambodia: Developing the Universal Access and<br />
Service Policy Framework in the ICT Sector<br />
Telecommunications $110,000 31-Dec-10 31-Aug-11 Completed
Africa<br />
Region Title Major Sector<br />
Europe &<br />
Central Asia<br />
Middle East &<br />
North Africa<br />
Africa: PPP Forum for Accelerating Infrastructure<br />
Development in Transport for Francophone Africa<br />
Turkmenistan: Enhancing Private Sector Participation<br />
at the Port of Turmenbashi<br />
Djibouti: Improving the Regulations of Private<br />
Operators in the Port Sector<br />
14<br />
Approval<br />
Amount<br />
Approval<br />
Date<br />
Completion<br />
Date<br />
Status<br />
Transportation $70,000 8-Jan-11 30-May-11 Completed<br />
Transportation $150,000 19-Jan-11 30-Apr-13 Ongoing<br />
Transportation $74,500 14-Feb-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />
Africa Kenya: PPP Unit Support Multi-sector $124,240 23-Feb-11 31-Aug-12 Ongoing<br />
Africa<br />
Cross-Regional<br />
Africa<br />
Africa<br />
Global<br />
South Asia<br />
Africa<br />
Rwanda: Independent Review of Energy Generation<br />
Investments<br />
Cross-Regional: Rapid Needs Assessment and Help<br />
Desk Service<br />
Africa: PPP Workshop Best Practices and Lessons<br />
Learned from Recent African Case Studies<br />
Uganda: Technical Assistance to Prepare PPP<br />
Pipeline<br />
Global: PPPs in Infrastructure Resource Center<br />
(PPPIRC) Website<br />
Bhutan: Improving the Capacity of the Government to<br />
Implement Infrastructure PPPs<br />
Malawi: Transaction Advice on Concession<br />
Renegotiation of the Railways<br />
Energy $74,500 28-Feb-11 30-Sep-11 Completed<br />
Multi-sector $300,000 10-Mar-11 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />
Multi-sector $75,000 30-Mar-11 31-Dec-11 Completed<br />
Multi-sector $70,000 7-Apr-11 31-Mar-12 Ongoing<br />
Multi-sector $332,000 24-Jun-11 30-Jun-13 Ongoing<br />
Multi-sector $167,450 30-Jun-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />
Transportation $166,156 30-Jun-11 14-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />
South Asia Bhutan: Telecom Sector Policy Roadmap Telecommunications $75,000 30-Aug-11 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />
Middle East &<br />
North Africa<br />
Europe and<br />
Central Asia<br />
South Asia<br />
Djibouti: Energy Sector Assessment Energy $459,275 24-Oct-11 31-Oct-12 Ongoing<br />
Albania: Technical Assessments of Bistrica 1, Bistrica<br />
2, Ulza, and Shkopeti Hydropower Plants<br />
Bhutan: Pre-feasibility Assessment of Infrastructure<br />
Projects Under a PPP Model<br />
Energy $75,000 15-Dec-11 30-Sep-12 Ongoing<br />
Multi-sector $64,450 12-Jan-12 30-Nov-12 Ongoing<br />
Africa Gabon: PPP Program Multi-sector $74,640 7-Feb-12 30-Jun-12 Ongoing<br />
Total $4,296,710
Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund as a<br />
Response to the Global Financial Crisis<br />
Trust Fund: 71466 - PPIAF Financial crisis - Status as of 03/31/12<br />
Description<br />
Contribution receipts<br />
Add:<br />
Investment Income<br />
Total Income (A)<br />
Less:<br />
Financial information summary (inception to date)<br />
15<br />
Amount in $<br />
7,507,918<br />
55,231<br />
7,563,149<br />
Administration fee 2% 150,158<br />
Disbursements made for the approved, ongoing activities 3,657,338<br />
Program Management Unit (PMU) administration expenses* 714,090<br />
Funds committed and pending to be disbursed to the task teams by PMU for the<br />
ongoing activities 315,275<br />
Total disbursements (B) 4,836,861<br />
Net fund balance (C) = (A) - (B) 2,726,288<br />
List of approved activities to be created in SAP (D)<br />
Support to PPP Program in Gabon 74,640<br />
Pipeline (E)<br />
PMU costs – additional funds to be allocated -<br />
Fund balance available for new commitments (F) = (C) – (D) – (E) 2,651,648<br />
Add:<br />
Contribution receipts anticipated<br />
(a) Received, but yet to be accounted -<br />
(b) To be received within the next 3 months -<br />
(c) To be received in the next 12 months<br />
Total receipts anticipated -<br />
* PMU Costs:<br />
Total PMU cost allowed per the agreement 714,090<br />
End disbursement date 12/31/2013
PPIAF Non-Core Trust Fund on Integrating<br />
Climate Change Agenda with Public-Private<br />
Partnerships<br />
Status Report<br />
April 2012
Overview<br />
Table of Contents<br />
I. Regional Climate Change Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust<br />
Fund<br />
1. Compact Fluorescent Lamp Waste Management in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />
2. Impact of Climate Change on the Transport Sector in Africa<br />
3. Lighting Africa Policy Issues<br />
4. Capacity Building Seminar on Geothermal Energy<br />
5. African Energy Ministers’ Conference<br />
6. Lighting Africa Expansion<br />
II. Country-Specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
1. South Africa: South African Cities Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program<br />
2. Côte d’Ivoire: Strategic Framework for the Development of Transport Infrastructure<br />
3. Kenya: Due Diligence for the Lake Turkana Wind Project<br />
4. Mali: Legal Advisory Services to the government of Mali for Scatec Solar Project<br />
III. Looking Ahead<br />
Annexes<br />
Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded through the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
1
Overview<br />
The PPIAF Trust Fund on Integrating Climate Change Agenda with Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)<br />
was set up in 2008 as a non-core multi-donor trust fund. This Trust Fund, funded by Norway and more<br />
recently by the Netherlands, aims to mainstream considerations of climate change externalities and<br />
opportunities with existing work in improving the delivery of infrastructure services. Four out of the ten<br />
activities funded through the Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund are currently under implementation.<br />
Annex 1 contains the pipeline of these activities, and Annex 2 provides a statement of funding for<br />
this trust fund.<br />
I. Regional Climate Change Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core<br />
Trust Fund<br />
Since 2009, PPIAF has supported six regional climate change activities in the transport and energy<br />
sectors in Africa.<br />
1. Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL) Waste Management in Sub-Saharan Africa ($170,000): this<br />
activity was approved on April 28, 2009. It supports a study that examines issues and options related to<br />
the proper disposal and recycling of mercury-containing lamps, and aims to enhance private sector<br />
participation and to mitigate environmental and health impacts of CFLs disposal. Implementation of the<br />
CFL waste management activity progressed steadily since its inception in June 2009, and the activity was<br />
completed in March 2011. The final report of the study provided a comprehensive analysis of sanitary<br />
risks induced by CFL distribution programs in Africa, and an analysis of practical options to deal with the<br />
issues of collecting and recycling mercury-contained lamps, including an enhanced role for the private<br />
sector for proper waste management. Among the recommendations of the study are: 1) to promote a<br />
strong and sustainable market penetration of readily available high-quality lamps; 2) to avoid mercury<br />
emissions by capture and confinement solutions that include proper landfilling; and 3) to control the<br />
impact of mercury emissions by applying waste management best practices.<br />
The activity also delivered six country case studies (Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Senegal,<br />
South Africa, and Uganda), which were showcased in the World Bank Compact Fluorescent Lamps toolkit<br />
funded through the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP). The results achieved by<br />
this activity are summarized in the table below.<br />
Results of the CFL Waste Management Activity<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Study of mercury-containing lamp<br />
waste management in Sub-Saharan<br />
Africa, December 2010<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Knowledge products disseminated<br />
� Dissemination of a Compact<br />
Fluorescent Lamps toolkit, available<br />
online. 1<br />
� The activity was completed on March 31, 2011. It is too<br />
early to report on some of the outcomes. PPIAF will<br />
continue to monitor results to capture the actual outcomes<br />
and impacts of this activity.<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� The CFL toolkit is being widely disseminated. The six<br />
country case studies have been integrated in the toolkit to<br />
enhance the technical capacities of decision-makers in<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa to design appropriate frameworks for<br />
CFL waste management.<br />
1 http://www.esmap.org/esmap/sites/esmap.org/files/CFL_Toolkit_Web_Version_102110_REVISED_FINAL.pdf<br />
2
2. Impact of Climate Change in the Transport Sector in Africa ($261,500): this activity was approved<br />
on May 27, 2009. It built on the ongoing work of the Sub-Saharan Africa Initiative to respond to the impact<br />
of climate change on the transport sector, and aimed to examine mitigation and adaptation measures<br />
needed to make climate-resilient transport systems in Africa. The activity was successfully implemented<br />
despite initial delays in the procurement process, and the study was completed in January 2011. It<br />
produced a guideline framework for upstream PPP work needed to address mitigation in Ghana and<br />
adaptation in Ethiopia and Mozambique.<br />
The preliminary findings of the study were presented to key practitioners in the African transport sector<br />
during a workshop held in Kampala, Uganda in October 2010, and during the World Bank’s Transport<br />
Forum held in Washington, DC in March 2011.<br />
Based on the recommendations of the study, the government of Ghana developed the Ghana Urban<br />
Transport project in April 2011 with the aim to improve mobility through a combination of traffic<br />
engineering measures, regulation of the public transport industry, and implementation of a bus rapid<br />
transit system. It is expected that the project increases the use of lower-emission transport along a pilot<br />
corridor in Accra.<br />
Results of the Impact of Climate Change on the Transport Sector in Africa Activity<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Study on transport climate-resilience in<br />
Ghana, Ethiopia, and Mozambique,<br />
December 2010<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
Knowledge products disseminated<br />
� Dissemination of case studies on climate<br />
change adaptation and mitigation in the<br />
transport sector in Ghana, Ethiopia, and<br />
Mozambique, October 2010–March 2011<br />
� In April 2011 the government of Ghana developed<br />
the Ghana Urban Transport project, which is<br />
expected to increase the use of lower emission<br />
transport in Accra<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� The two dissemination workshops held in Kampala<br />
in October 2010 and in Washington, DC, in March<br />
2011, helped raise the awareness of policy makers<br />
and potential private investors how Africa’s road<br />
transport sector could adapt to climate change.<br />
3. Lighting Africa Policy Issues ($350,000): this activity was approved on August 12, 2009. It is a<br />
follow-up to the Lighting Africa Conference and Development Marketplace Competition held in Accra,<br />
Ghana, on May 5–8, 2008. PPIAF was a key sponsor of the Lighting Africa Development Marketplace<br />
competition that selected 16 organizations for the development and delivery of improved lighting products<br />
and services for Sub-Saharan Africa. Lighting Africa is a joint World Bank and IFC program that seeks to<br />
accelerate the development of markets for modern off-grid lighting products in Sub-Saharan Africa where<br />
an estimated 10–30% of household incomes are spent on hazardous and low quality fuel-based lighting<br />
products.<br />
The PPIAF grant supported a study on key policy and regulatory issues affecting adoption and scale-up<br />
of clean, low-cost lighting products, and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />
Country policy reports were prepared for eight countries in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cameroon, Democratic<br />
Republic of Congo, Ghana, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Senegal. The preliminary findings of<br />
the study were presented to African policy and decision-makers at a workshop held in Nairobi, Kenya in<br />
3
May 2010. Key issues addressed during the workshop were policy and regulatory barriers and the<br />
mobilization of finance and business support services. The following lessons have been also learned:<br />
lighting products need to be 1) easy to use and understand; 2) seen as relevant and capable of delivering<br />
their promised service; and 3) affordable and offer good value for money.<br />
Recommended policy interventions include:<br />
� Incorporate modern lighting strategies into overall government development and poverty<br />
reduction strategy<br />
� Adjust regulatory environments to favor modern lighting solutions<br />
� Support a market transition to high-quality products<br />
� Facilitate a competitively priced supply chain that delivers lighting products to all segments of the<br />
market<br />
� Ensure that the widest possible access to modern lighting is achieved, particularly among the<br />
poor<br />
The implementation of this activity was completed in June 2011.<br />
Results of the Lighting Africa Policy Issues Activity<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Study on Lighting Africa Policy Issues; country<br />
reports for Cameroon, Democratic Republic of<br />
Congo, Ghana, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Kenya,<br />
Tanzania, and Senegal, December 2010<br />
� Policy note summarizing the findings of the<br />
countries studies, August 2011<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� Regional workshop held in Nairobi, Kenya, on<br />
May 18–20, 2010<br />
� PPIAF will monitor results to capture the actual<br />
outcomes and impacts of the activity.<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� During the workshop, dozens of African policy<br />
makers and other key stakeholders in the energy<br />
sector discussed opportunities to scale up the<br />
use of renewable energies in Africa<br />
4. Capacity Building Seminar on Geothermal Energy ($30,000): this activity was approved on<br />
December 30, 2010. The PPIAF grant helped enhanced the capacity of five senior officials from Kenya,<br />
Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Djibouti on geothermal energy, as these countries strive to exploit this<br />
untapped natural resource. The five policy makers were sponsored by PPIAF to participate in a training<br />
seminar on held in Iceland in January 2011, organized by the African Development Bank. The seminar<br />
helped them get a clearer understanding of how to handle geothermal development issues with the<br />
involvement of the private sector. All five countries are developing a pipeline of geothermal projects with<br />
private sector participation. Kenya, the largest producer of geothermal power in Africa, is looking at<br />
increasing the participation of the private sector in the supply of energy to surpass hydropower as the top<br />
contributor to the country’s electricity grid by 2014. Kenya is developing a $1.3 billion, 280 MW,<br />
geothermal project that could help the country meet the growing demand for electricity.<br />
4
Results of the Capacity Building Activity on Geothermal Energy<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� Capacity building seminar held in<br />
Reykjavík, Iceland on January<br />
13–16, 2011<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� Five African policy makers attended a seminar on geothermal<br />
energy held in Reykjavík, Iceland, on January 13–16, 2011<br />
where they learned how to develop tools to implement<br />
geothermal projects in their countries<br />
5. African Energy Ministers’ Conference ($40,000): this activity was approved on August 23, 2011.<br />
The objective was to facilitate the formation of consensus on priorities for supporting Africa’s low carbon,<br />
climate resilient energy development agenda, including in the context of climate change negotiations. The<br />
two-day Ministerial Conference, co-sponsored by PPIAF, was held in Johannesburg, South Africa on<br />
September 15 and 16, 2011. The conference provided an important platform for high-level policy dialogue<br />
to build consensus and catalyze action for sustainable energy access across the African continent. In<br />
addition, it highlighted Africa’s energy challenges and critical energy investment priorities that need to be<br />
addressed.<br />
Results of the African Energy Ministers’ Conference Activity<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� African Energy Ministers’ Conference held in Johannesburg,<br />
South Africa on September 15 and 16, 2011<br />
Knowledge products disseminated<br />
� Background papers and briefing notes on key thematic areas;<br />
Proceedings Report summarizing the Conference; Regionalbased<br />
action plan document with key participating parties<br />
5<br />
Consensus achieved<br />
� Consensus achieved on priorities<br />
for supporting Africa’s low<br />
carbon, climate resilient energy<br />
development agenda<br />
6. Lighting Africa Expansion ($250,000): this activity was approved on December 5, 2011 to help the<br />
Lighting Africa program scale-up its activities in Sub-Saharan Africa. The program leveraged $500,000<br />
from the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) and the Global Partnership on<br />
Output-Based Aid (GPOBA). The purpose of this activity is to accelerate the adoption of affordable, clean<br />
low-carbon off-grid lighting technologies to bottom of the pyramid households and businesses throughout<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa that rely on candles, kerosene, and other environmentally harmful fuels for their<br />
lighting needs.<br />
The PPIAF grant will finance the development of national off-grid lighting programs in selected countries.<br />
It is expected that the total of up to eight countries can be reached with the available funds. The focus will<br />
be on countries where the private market is expected to be strongest, such as Nigeria, Tanzania,<br />
Senegal, and Mali, as well as on post-conflict countries where the needs are strongest (e.g., South<br />
Sudan, Liberia, Rwanda, and Democratic Republic of Congo).
The proposed activity will leverage earlier PPIAF support, including Lighting Africa Development<br />
Marketplace and Policy and Regulatory Study, by scaling up the benefits of Lighting Africa to additional<br />
households in new countries.<br />
The expected closing date for this activity is September 30, 2013. PPIAF will monitor results to capture<br />
the actual outcomes and impacts of the activity.<br />
II. Country-specific Activities Funded through PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust<br />
Fund<br />
In addition to regional activities, PPIAF supported four country-specific climate change activities in South<br />
Africa, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, and Mali.<br />
1. South Africa: South African Cities Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program<br />
($400,000): this activity was approved on August 27, 2009. It aims to support the South African Cities<br />
Network to implement a renewable energy and energy efficiency program for improved infrastructure<br />
development through private investment across nine South African cities.<br />
The activity included a component on pre-feasibility studies to help prepare renewable energy and energy<br />
efficiency (REEE) within South Africa’s municipalities in order to mitigate climate change from the bottomup<br />
by providing a well-documented, replicable framework for other municipalities to follow. The project<br />
delivered four pre-feasibility studies: Energy Efficient Street Lighting, Energy Efficient Lighting in<br />
Municipal Buildings, Implementation of Solar Water Heaters to Middle Class Neighbourhoods, and Micro<br />
Hydro Electricity Potential Study. Each pre-feasibility report came with terms of reference detailing the<br />
next steps for each project.<br />
The consultant also developed an online toolkit on REEE consisting of reviews of REEE technologies,<br />
analysis of the policy and legislative landscape, and links to useful online resources.<br />
A one-day conference on climate change, co-organized by PPIAF and the South African Cities Network,<br />
was held in September 2011 to share lessons learned from the various business plan developments.<br />
Results of the South African Cities Energy Efficient and Renewable Energy Program<br />
Outputs Outcomes<br />
Enabling environment reform<br />
Analyses/assessments prepared<br />
� Four pre-feasibility studies were<br />
developed: Energy Efficient Street<br />
Lighting, Energy Efficient Lighting in<br />
Municipal Buildings, Implementation<br />
of Solar Water Heaters to Middle<br />
Class Neighbourhoods, and Micro<br />
Hydro Electricity Potential Study<br />
Capacity and awareness building<br />
Workshops/seminars<br />
� A workshop was organized for<br />
participating municipalities in<br />
September 2011<br />
� The government of South Africa has approved the<br />
findings of the studies and is seeking funding to conduct<br />
full feasibility studies for the following projects:<br />
– City of Johannesburg’s energy efficient street<br />
lighting<br />
– City of Tshwane’s solar water heating in the<br />
middle-income neighborhoods<br />
– City of Tshwane’s energy efficient lighting in the<br />
municipal buildings<br />
– City of Cape Town’s micro hydro potential<br />
Technical capacity enhanced<br />
� The representatives of the participating municipalities<br />
received training on preparation and implementation of<br />
renewable energy and energy efficiency projects,<br />
September 2001<br />
6
2. Côte d’Ivoire: Strategic Framework for the Development of Transport Infrastructure ($349,000):<br />
this activity was approved on November 2, 2009. At the request of the government of Côte d’Ivoire,<br />
PPIAF is supporting a strategy for the development and maintenance of transport infrastructure, including<br />
mitigation mechanisms against the impact of climate change and options for private sector participation in<br />
future infrastructure investments.<br />
The political crisis in Côte d’Ivoire has significantly derailed the procurement process, which has thus<br />
delayed the launch of the work. The activity was cancelled in August 2011 at the request of the<br />
government of Côte d’Ivoire.<br />
3. Kenya: Due Diligence for the Lake Turkana Wind Project ($294,900): this activity was approved<br />
on November 30, 2011. Following a request from the government of Kenya, the World Bank Group<br />
intends to provide risk guarantees that will enable the realization of the Lake Turkana Wind Power<br />
project, a 300 MW wind power generation facility expected to represent 17% of Kenya’s installed capacity<br />
at completion. This project, expected to be worth over €600 million, is part of Kenya’s Independent Power<br />
Producer program and reflects strong cooperation and synergies between the public and private sectors.<br />
Against this background, PPIAF approved this grant to support the review of project documents and<br />
provision of strategic inputs, as well as support Kenya Power Company in discussions and negotiations of<br />
the Power Purchase Agreement and other relevant project agreements for the Lake Turkana Wind Power<br />
project. Additional support will be provided for an in-depth technical and legal review of the proposed<br />
construction contract and technical solution for the wind resource, the turbine choice, as well as the<br />
building of a transmission line and substations for evacuation of power from the Lake Turkana Wind<br />
Power project.<br />
The expected closing date for this activity is December 31, 2012. PPIAF will monitor results to capture the<br />
actual outcomes and impacts of the activity.<br />
4. Mali: Legal Advisory Services to the Government of Mali for Scatec Solar Project ($49,950):<br />
this activity was approved on November 30, 2011. The government of Mali signed a memorandum of<br />
understanding with Scatec Solar AS (Norway) for the development of the Scatec Solar project as a PPP.<br />
This represents the development, financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of solar<br />
photovoltaic system for a total capacity of 60 MW. The project will be develop by Scatec Solar and<br />
includes a pilot project of 7 MW in Mopti. PPIAF has approved a small-size grant to provide the<br />
government of Mali with the services of a legal advisor who will assist in the review and negotiation of<br />
legal documentation necessary to carry out the PPP project. The Scatec project is the pilot phase for a<br />
further 53 MW clean energy program to be develop in rural areas considered as isolate centers.<br />
The expected closing date for this activity is December 31, 2012. However, there is a high risk that the<br />
activity will be delayed or cancelled due to the political coup that occurred in Mali on March 22, 2012.<br />
III. Looking Ahead<br />
Through the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund, PPIAF has provided technical assistance to<br />
help African countries use PPPs in efforts to address climate change-related issues by improving the<br />
delivery of infrastructure services in Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />
The pilot project ended in August 2011. Building on the satisfactory implementation of ongoing activities<br />
funded through the Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund in Sub-Saharan Africa, PPIAF sought<br />
additional funding to expand the climate change program globally. New funding would support innovative<br />
activities that help establish strong institutional and regulatory frameworks that incorporate adaptation and<br />
mitigation measures to attract private sector climate finance in low-carbon and climate-resilient<br />
infrastructure PPPs.<br />
7
In addition to Norway, the Netherlands have also provided funding to support the PPIAF Public-Private<br />
Partnerships and Climate Change initiative. The closing date of the Trust Fund has been extended to<br />
December 31, 2014. In accordance to PPIAF’s 2011–2013 Work Program, funding will be used to provide<br />
technical assistance to help countries develop appropriate policy strategies, action plans, and regulations<br />
that incorporate adaptation and mitigation measures to attract private sector participation in climatefriendly<br />
infrastructure PPPs (i.e., power, transport, water, sanitation, and solid waste, including urban<br />
infrastructure).<br />
8
Africa<br />
Annex 1: Pipeline of Activities Funded Through the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
Region Title Major Sector<br />
Africa: Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL) Waste<br />
Management<br />
9<br />
Approval<br />
Amount<br />
Approval<br />
Date<br />
Completion<br />
Date<br />
Status<br />
Energy $170,000 28-Apr-09 31-Mar-11 Completed<br />
Africa Africa: Impact of Climate Change in Transport Transportation $261,500 27-May-09 31-Jan-11 Completed<br />
Africa Africa: Lighting Africa Policy issues Energy $350,000 12-Aug-09 30-Jun-11 Completed<br />
Africa<br />
Africa<br />
South Africa: South African Cities Energy Efficient and<br />
Renewable Energy Program<br />
Côte d’Ivoire: Strategic Framework for the Development<br />
of Transport Infrastructure<br />
Energy $400,000 27-Aug-09 30-Jun-11 Completed<br />
Transportation $349,000 2-Nov-09 30-Jun-11 Cancelled<br />
Africa Africa: Capacity Building Seminar on Geothermal Energy Energy $30,000 30-Dec-10 29-Feb-11 Completed<br />
Africa Africa: African Energy Ministers’ Conference Energy $40,000 23-Aug-11 31-Dec-11 Completed<br />
Africa Kenya: Wind Diligence for Lake Turkana Project Energy $294,900 30-Nov-11 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />
Africa<br />
Mali: Legal Advisory Services to the government of Mali<br />
for the Scatec Solar Project<br />
Energy $49,950 30-Nov-11 31-Dec-12 Ongoing<br />
Africa Africa: Lighting Africa Expansion Energy $250,000 5-Dec-11 30-Sep-13 Ongoing<br />
Total $2,195,350
Annex 2: Statement of Funding for the PPIAF Climate Change Non-Core Trust Fund<br />
Trust Fund: 71153 - PPIAF Integrating Climate Change Agenda with Public-Private<br />
Partnerships Program – Status as of March 31, 2012<br />
Contribution receipts<br />
Add:<br />
Investment Income<br />
Total Income (A)<br />
Less:<br />
Administration fee 2%<br />
Description<br />
Financial information summary (inception to date)<br />
Disbursements made for the approved, on-going activities<br />
Program Management Unit (PMU) administration expenses<br />
Funds committed and pending to be disbursed to the task teams by PMU for the on-going<br />
activities<br />
Total disbursements (B)<br />
Net fund balance (C) = (A) - (B)<br />
List of approved activities to be created in SAP (D)<br />
Mali: Legal Advisory Support for the Scatec Solar Project<br />
Pipeline (E)<br />
PMU costs - additional funds to be allocated (TF094229)<br />
Fund balance available for new commitments (F) = (C) - (D) - (E)<br />
* PMU Costs:<br />
15% of contribution received to date<br />
End disbursement date 12/31/2014<br />
10<br />
Amount in $<br />
4,028,006<br />
48,997<br />
4,077,003<br />
80,560<br />
1,649,201<br />
604,000<br />
144,900<br />
2,478,661<br />
1,598,342<br />
49,950<br />
201<br />
1,548,191<br />
604,201
Development Impact of Fragility<br />
Report for IFC on Fragile States as of April 2012<br />
1<br />
April 2012<br />
Fragile and conflict-affected states suffer from low economic growth and development, and citizens of<br />
these states lack access to basic services. More than 1.5 billion people live in countries affected by<br />
fragility, violence, and conflict. No low-income fragile state has achieved a single Millennium Development<br />
Goal, and poverty reduction in countries affected by violence is on average nearly a percentage point<br />
lower per year than in countries not affected by violence.<br />
The Infrastructure Challenge in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States<br />
Fragile and conflict-affected states have an urgent need to deliver basic infrastructure services. However,<br />
characterized by the negative impacts of conflict or natural disasters, infrastructure service provision in<br />
these states is often left underfunded, and in many cases, damaged or destroyed. In addition, fragile and<br />
conflict-affected states often have inadequate public revenues and insufficient government capacity to<br />
provide these services.<br />
Opportunities exist to leverage the private sector in the financing and operation of vital infrastructure<br />
assets. Mobilizing private sector financing and expertise can break the cycle of low investment, low<br />
productivity, and resurgent conflict.<br />
Nevertheless, challenges remain in attracting private investors with the risk appetite inherent in working in<br />
fragile and conflict-affected states:<br />
� Higher political and economic risks<br />
� Weak investment climate/enabling environment<br />
� Lack of counterpart agents<br />
� Greater investment needs<br />
� Lower payment capacities on the part of consumers<br />
Laying the Groundwork for Private Sector Participation<br />
Establishing an early track record of attracting private investment and demonstrating good contractual<br />
faith can have a positive demonstration effect on other potential private investors. Creating a solid<br />
enabling environment and investment climate through legal, regulatory, and policy reforms can represent<br />
the first steps on the road to improved infrastructure service provision through private participation.<br />
In post-conflict states, mobile telephony has successfully attracted rapid private sector interest due to the<br />
sector’s short cost re<strong>cover</strong>y period. Investments in other sectors such as power generation and ports<br />
have also taken place relatively soon following the end of conflict. Choosing first projects with the highest<br />
chance of success can create a signaling effect, with the possibility to sequence further activities in other<br />
sectors based on the success of initial projects.<br />
PPIAF-IFC Collaboration in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States<br />
PPIAF and IFC are committed to supporting governments in fragile and conflict-affected states to deliver<br />
basic services to citizens. In June 2010 the IFC provided PPIAF $2 million, 30% of which was targeted<br />
towards IDA-eligible fragile states, with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />
PPIAF has used the funds to attempt to address the development issues that plague fragile and conflictaffected<br />
states by supporting an enabling environment for long-term private sector investments in<br />
infrastructure and by funding activities in telecommunications and other sectors with the highest likelihood<br />
of yielding immediate impact. Examples of PPIAF technical assistance include:
� Preparation of a pre-feasibility or feasibility study for a specific project<br />
� Capacity building support to strengthen knowledge and technical capacity on private sector<br />
participation strategies<br />
� Developing of sector strategies and policies related to private participation in infrastructure<br />
� Quick screening of potential projects with private sector investment<br />
� Payment for legal counsel<br />
Results of PPIAF-IFC Support<br />
PPIAF and IFC teams have worked closely together to screen activities and provide funding to those<br />
activities that have the greatest potential for success in the long term. Thus far, this collaboration has<br />
yielded impressive results:<br />
� C3P has signed six mandates directly following support from PPIAF-IFC funds<br />
� One potential mandate is currently at post-quality at entry stage<br />
� One existing mandate used PPIAF-IFC funds to strengthen the mandate’s implementation and<br />
chance of success<br />
� One existing mandate used PPIAF-IFC funds to provide a post-transaction communications plan<br />
� 77% of country-specific activities took place in fragile countries, representing 80% of funding<br />
� 100% of country-specific activities took place in IDA countries, representing 100% of funding<br />
� 56% of activities were managed by C3P staff, representing 64% of funding<br />
An additional benefit of PPIAF support is that funding can be provided in support of C3P mandates, prior<br />
to the signing of such mandates. This can provide C3P with further leverage when negotiating mandates<br />
with clients.<br />
Support has also been provided for World Bank projects, for example:<br />
� In Chad, the government is launching a bidding process to select a private operator for the water<br />
sector under a three-year service contract<br />
� In Liberia, PPIAF support has catalyzed government commitment to launch a PPP program, and<br />
projects are currently being identified for further pre-feasibility analysis<br />
2
Lesotho: Technical Assistance for PPP Policy<br />
PPIAF funding: $74,910<br />
In 2004 PPIAF supported the preparation of a Country Framework<br />
Report in Lesotho, which included an action plan for facilitating private<br />
participation infrastructure. Since then, the government of Leostho<br />
embarked on a series of PPP projects, the largest being the $100<br />
million Lesotho hospital PPP, structured by IFC, which reached financial<br />
close in March 2009. The government was interested in launching a<br />
more systematic PPP program to <strong>cover</strong> all sectors, and provide greater<br />
autonomy to line ministries to develop PPPs of their own. The<br />
government viewed the development of a PPP policy and guidelines as<br />
a key step to institutionalizing PPPs across government.<br />
PPIAF’s Contribution: PPIAF provided support for an analysis of the legislative and regulatory framework relating to<br />
PPPs in Lesotho and the development of a draft PPP Policy to be used as a basis for promoting PPPs in the country.<br />
The activity fit in parallel with a separate activity to identify and prioritize a PPP pipeline.<br />
Results: The PPP Policy is currently waiting to be approved by Parliament, and a draft PPP Law is also in the<br />
process of being drafted. Following on from the PPIAF activity, IFC C3P has signed three mandates with the<br />
government of Lesotho: 1) ICT and facilities management PPP to connect 165 rural health centers; 2) medical waste;<br />
and 3) wind farm.<br />
PPIAF has provided follow-on support for legal advisory services for the ICT and facilities management PPP, and an<br />
application to support the wind farm through assistance to the Lesotho Electricity Generation Authority is currently<br />
being considered.<br />
The table below lists C3P mandates that have been signed or are at a developed stage of discussion that<br />
have benefitted from PPIAF support using IFC funds. A full list of activities and results can be found in<br />
Annex 1.<br />
PPIAF-Funded Activity Related C3P Mandate Results<br />
Guinea-Bissau: PPP Training Workshop Guinea-Bissau: Support to<br />
Mandate signed<br />
Guinea-Bissau: Preparation of the Strategy Electricidade e Águas de Guinea- 8/4/2011<br />
for Private Sector Participation in the Water<br />
and Electricity Sector<br />
Bissau<br />
Lesotho: PPP Policy Lesotho: Health Centers ICT Mandates signed<br />
Lesotho: Medical Waste<br />
Lesotho: Wind<br />
2/9/2012<br />
Maldives: Solid Waste Management<br />
Maldives: Solid waste Mandate<br />
Communication Program<br />
successfully<br />
closed<br />
Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Supply Project— Rwanda: Kigali Bulk Water Mandate signed<br />
Technical Assistance and Capacity Training<br />
10/14/2010<br />
South Asia: Leveraging PPPs for<br />
Bhutan: Urban Transport Mandate signed<br />
Development—Workshops on Building<br />
Awareness and Strengthening Capacity for<br />
PPPs in South Asia<br />
4/27/2011<br />
Timor-Leste: Implementation of PPP<br />
Timor-Leste: Dili Airport Post Quality at<br />
Program<br />
Entry<br />
West Bank & Gaza: Southern West Bank West Bank & Gaza: West Bank Solid Mandate signed<br />
Solid Waste Management Project<br />
Waste Management<br />
12/19/2011<br />
3
Annex 1<br />
The table below lists the activities approved using IFC funds since July 2010. IFC funds are 100%<br />
committed. We are monitoring ongoing activities to ensure they are implemented as intended and deliver<br />
results.<br />
Title Description of Activity Status of Activity<br />
Afghanistan:<br />
Assessment of<br />
Constraints to<br />
Increased Private<br />
Participation in<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Chad: Support to<br />
Private Sector<br />
Participation in<br />
the Water Sector<br />
Guinea-Bissau:<br />
PPP Training<br />
Workshop<br />
This PPIAF grant is supporting a complete diagnostic<br />
of the PPP enabling environment in Afghanistan. It<br />
will lay the ground work for the future development of<br />
a business plan for the PPP cell to be established in<br />
the Ministry of Finance and the requisite guidelines<br />
and procedures for the cell.<br />
Analyze options for private sector participation in<br />
Chad's water sector.<br />
PPIAF funding is supporting: 1) an analysis of the<br />
sector legal framework; 2) a review Societé<br />
Tchadienne des Eaux (STE)'s current performance;<br />
3) an analysis of the potential participation of the<br />
private sector in the delivery of potable water<br />
services; and 4) an assessment of STE's financial<br />
situation.<br />
The PPP workshop is designed to strengthen the<br />
institutional capacity of Guinée-Bissau’s state-owned<br />
electricity and water utility (EAGB) as well as that of<br />
key stakeholders and government officials<br />
responsible for other sectors with strong PPP<br />
potential.<br />
The workshop will be a learning platform for<br />
government officials and other stakeholders to share<br />
best practices and emerging lessons regarding the<br />
design, implementation, and monitoring of PPPs. The<br />
main beneficiaries of the workshop will be the newlyformed<br />
EAGB PPP Commission, officials from the<br />
Ministry of Energy, and the Ministry of the Economy,<br />
Planning and Regional Integration. It will have the<br />
dual objective of strengthening the capacity of those<br />
officials that will be engaging in preparing and<br />
launching the transaction for a PPP in EAGB, and will<br />
open the discussion to the participation of the private<br />
sector in several other sectors that are of direct<br />
interest for the country.<br />
4<br />
This work is ongoing in close<br />
collaboration with C3P.<br />
Following the PPIAF activity<br />
the government adopted the<br />
PPP strategy including the<br />
recruitment of a private<br />
operator under a 3-year<br />
Service Contract. In June<br />
2011 the World Bank<br />
approved a $27 million<br />
Additional Financing to<br />
support this strategy. The<br />
bidding process for<br />
recruitment of the private<br />
operator is expected to be<br />
launched in April 2012.<br />
The workshop took place in<br />
Bissau from November 7- 11,<br />
2011, attended by around 50<br />
participants. A diverse roster<br />
of speakers contributed to<br />
strengthening the capacity of<br />
government officials working<br />
on the EAGB PPP project as<br />
well as stakeholders in other<br />
sectors.<br />
The training provided an<br />
opportunity for a robust<br />
dialogue on infrastructure<br />
PPPs in general, and the<br />
EAGB PPP project in<br />
particular, which is currently<br />
under preparation, also with<br />
PPIAF support.<br />
Amount<br />
Requested/<br />
Actual<br />
Fragile<br />
$71,250 Yes<br />
$189,730 Yes<br />
49,963 Yes
Guinea-Bissau:<br />
Preparation of<br />
the Strategy for<br />
Private Sector<br />
Participation in<br />
the Water and<br />
Electricity Sector<br />
Guinea: PPP<br />
Training<br />
Workshop<br />
Lesotho: PPP<br />
Policy<br />
Liberia:<br />
Assessment of<br />
PPP Pipeline and<br />
Enabling<br />
Environment<br />
The overall objective of the activity is to successfully<br />
select a private operator for electricity and water<br />
supply/distribution in Bissau. Success will be<br />
measured by a government of Guinea-Bissau<br />
decision to implement the Phase I recommendations<br />
to introduce private sector participation in EAGB. The<br />
PPIAF grant will permit the government to focus on<br />
addressing the technical, legal, institutional, financial<br />
as well as other issues necessary to make an<br />
informed decision as to how to improve the<br />
performance and impact of EAGB through a private<br />
sector participation arrangement. DevCo funds will<br />
also be used during Phase I to defray the IFC costs<br />
associated with this activity. Phase 2 costs will be<br />
largely funded by DevCo. The objective of this phase<br />
is to successfully tender and select a private operator<br />
for EAGB.<br />
The government requested PPIAF funding to support<br />
a three-day PPP training workshop as a learning<br />
platform for approximately 50 key stakeholders to<br />
share best practices and emerging lessons regarding<br />
the design, implementation and monitoring of PPPs,<br />
focused on sectors that are directly relevant to<br />
Guinea.<br />
The government requested PPIAF assistance in<br />
developing a PPP policy for Lesotho. PPIAF funding<br />
would support: 1) an analysis of the legislative and<br />
regulatory environment in Lesotho as relevant to<br />
PPPs; 2) the identification of a PPP pipeline; and 3) a<br />
draft PPP policy and recommendations for next steps.<br />
The objective is to develop a comprehensive, clearly<br />
articulated PPP policy that allows the government to<br />
embark on PPPs in all sectors in a more systematic<br />
manner and provides greater autonomy to line<br />
ministries and other government entities to embark on<br />
PPPs on their own.<br />
The government of Liberia has recently embarked on<br />
a ―national visioning‖ exercise that aims for Liberia to<br />
achieve middle-income status by 2030 through<br />
economic diversification, infrastructure improvement,<br />
and good governance. In particular, the government<br />
of Liberia has recognized the need to leverage private<br />
sector investment in priority sectors of the economy<br />
to accelerate growth. The government of Liberia<br />
requested PPIAF assistance to perform a rapid<br />
scoping of the PPP pipeline and the PPP enabling<br />
environment. This work will facilitate the government<br />
to structure a PPP engagement program that seeks<br />
to address critical policy, institutional, and legal<br />
weaknesses that deter private sector investment and<br />
also put in place proper institutional and project<br />
development services to guide PPP transactions to<br />
market according to best practices.<br />
5<br />
The activity is progressing<br />
well. The call for elections<br />
after the death of the<br />
President slowed progress<br />
slightly, but commitment of<br />
the relevant ministries to the<br />
project remains strong.<br />
The following has already<br />
been achieved:<br />
- completed a 3-day PPP<br />
seminar (see above)<br />
- organized three stakeholder<br />
events (donors' roundtable<br />
and separate workshops for<br />
EAGB and private sector<br />
stakeholders)<br />
- completed the due diligence<br />
of EAGB.<br />
- completed communications<br />
plan<br />
The workshop is due to take<br />
place in Conakry on May 16-<br />
17, 2012 under the auspices<br />
of the Ministry of Finance.<br />
The training will focus on<br />
electricity, telecoms, and<br />
transport (including mining).<br />
PPP Policy is pending<br />
cabinet approval.<br />
Following on from this<br />
activity, C3P has recently<br />
signed three mandates with<br />
the government of Lesotho.<br />
PPIAF has provided<br />
additional funding to retain a<br />
legal consultant for the health<br />
centers ICT project.<br />
Further PPIAF support to the<br />
wind mandate and PPP<br />
legislation is also planned.<br />
This activity identified a<br />
selection of PPP projects with<br />
strong support from the<br />
government. The work was<br />
completed under close<br />
collaboration with C3P.<br />
Additional PPIAF support is<br />
planned to fund pre-feasibility<br />
work on one of the projects<br />
identified in the pipeline<br />
screening.<br />
$439,850 Yes<br />
$57,763 Yes<br />
$71,900<br />
(actual)<br />
$71,557<br />
(actual)<br />
No<br />
Yes
Maldives: Solid<br />
Waste<br />
Management<br />
Communication<br />
Program<br />
Middle East and<br />
North Africa:<br />
Training Course<br />
on PPPs in the<br />
Water Sector<br />
Rwanda: Kigali<br />
Bulk Water<br />
Supply Project—<br />
Technical<br />
Assistance and<br />
Capacity Training<br />
The government of Maldives wants to explore private<br />
sector participation in scientific management of the<br />
waste disposal site on Thilafushi Island and in<br />
developing and implementing an integrated waste<br />
management system, which will include collection,<br />
transfer, processing, and disposal of waste. The<br />
government sought support to assist them in<br />
developing and implementing a communication plan<br />
to ensure that all key stakeholders, opinion makers,<br />
customers (including resorts), and the public as a<br />
whole have access to clear, accurate, and<br />
comprehensive information about the project and are<br />
appropriately consulted on major aspects of the<br />
project. These tasks should contribute to a systematic<br />
effort at change management at the Waste<br />
Management Corporation and with project<br />
stakeholders overall, in order to address the<br />
sensitivities normally associated with a PPP process.<br />
The overall objective of the communication and public<br />
relations program will be to increase awareness,<br />
improve knowledge, understand stakeholder<br />
concerns so that these could be addressed, and<br />
strive for broad-based support for the project.<br />
The workshop is designed to build awareness and<br />
train key government officials from the water<br />
ministries of Iraq, Jordan, and the West Bank & Gaza<br />
on PPP options in the delivery of water services. It is<br />
expected that the training will be attended 15–20<br />
participants. The training workshop will be a learning<br />
platform to provide a basic understanding, build<br />
capacity, and share best practices and emerging<br />
lessons regarding the design, implementation, and<br />
monitoring of PPPs in the water sector.<br />
The objective of this PPIAF activity is to support the<br />
key stakeholders in strengthening their ability to<br />
oversee and implement the PPP transaction currently<br />
being structured by IFC. This will be implemented in<br />
through three main components:<br />
1) Institutional Support Component: to assist the<br />
Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA) in<br />
identifying the most appropriate organizational<br />
structure and developing the capacity of the<br />
organization.<br />
2) Technical Support Component: to assist EWSA<br />
with the first steps to developing a long-term master<br />
plan and to strengthen their monitoring and<br />
management capacity to accommodate growth in<br />
water supplied and increase operational capacity and<br />
efficiency.<br />
3) Training: to provide appropriate targeted training<br />
on PPP for key stakeholders<br />
6<br />
This activity provided posttransaction<br />
related support<br />
for a successful C3P<br />
mandate.<br />
Workshop successfully<br />
completed.<br />
The consultants have been<br />
selected, and work begins in<br />
mid-March 2012 for the<br />
EWSA institutional support<br />
and EWSA technical<br />
monitoring. The technical<br />
assistance and capacity<br />
building is in support of the<br />
Kigali Bulk Water Supply<br />
Project being structured by<br />
C3P.<br />
$50,000 No<br />
$50,000 N/A<br />
$207,700 No
South Asia:<br />
Leveraging PPPs<br />
for Development<br />
– Workshops on<br />
Building<br />
Awareness and<br />
Strengthening<br />
Capacity for<br />
PPPs in South<br />
Asia<br />
South Asia:<br />
Urban Water and<br />
Sanitation<br />
Transformation<br />
South Sudan:<br />
Diagnostic of<br />
Power<br />
Distribution<br />
System<br />
The project is a series of PPP awareness building<br />
workshops to be held in Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka,<br />
and Bangladesh. Developed through a consultative<br />
process between IFC and key government officials in<br />
each of the proposed countries, the PPP workshops<br />
are designed to address the needs of national<br />
governments and policymakers, as well as other key<br />
stakeholders, to better understand the fundamentals<br />
of PPPs and sector-specific issues.<br />
This PPIAF support shall be utilized to encourage<br />
governments to think through PPP options for<br />
strategy infrastructure development and to explore<br />
PPP opportunities to expand IFC’s engagement with<br />
the rest of the region in South Asia. Extending the<br />
seminar series to Indian low-income states is also<br />
being discussed.<br />
The objective of this consultancy is to support the<br />
Bank team in identifying and assessing various PPP<br />
models that could be used in urban water and<br />
sanitation services projects in South Asia to achieve<br />
the goal of delivering sustainable 24/7 water supply<br />
and improved sanitation to current service areas<br />
within a five to six year project period. The<br />
assignment will be split into three phases: 1)<br />
characterize the typical situations to be found in<br />
urban water and sanitation service delivery in South<br />
Asia and hence identify the specific challenges that<br />
are to be faced in developing PPP models to deliver<br />
the above service delivery goal; 2) review national<br />
and international experience in PPPs to identify<br />
possible strengths and weaknesses in meeting the<br />
service delivery goal, and to draw on those reviews<br />
and the consultant’s experience to develop models<br />
that may be appropriate for the South Asia setting;<br />
and 3) carry out a ―market sounding‖ exercise with<br />
potential private sector operators, local urban water<br />
utilities and other government stakeholders to get<br />
their feedback on the PPP options identified in the<br />
second phase.<br />
The Norwegian government has been in discussions<br />
with the government to construct a 30MW hydro plant<br />
at Fula Rapids. Feasibility work has begun, but the<br />
Norwegians have expressed concern about credible<br />
off-take given the current state of the South Sudan<br />
Electricity Corporation (SSEC), the state-owned utility<br />
responsible for power distribution in Juba, Wau, and<br />
Malakal. Based on their experience with IFC in<br />
Liberia, the Norwegians approached IFC to address<br />
the distribution system and structure a management<br />
contract to increase the efficiency of SSEC and<br />
provide a credible off-taker for Fula. In light of this,<br />
IFC engaged in discussions with the government to<br />
provide transaction advice to select an operator to<br />
manage SSEC under a management contract.<br />
It was decided that IFC would first carry out a<br />
diagnostic study, to be funded by PPIAF, to<br />
determine the investment and energy requirements to<br />
upgrade/rehabilitate the power distribution system in<br />
Juba. This diagnostic would then serve as a basis for<br />
the government to search for donor funds to<br />
subsidize the capital and operating costs of such a<br />
project. After this, IFC could then provide transaction<br />
advice to help the government identify and select a<br />
private sector partner to operate SSEC under a<br />
management contract.<br />
7<br />
Following from the<br />
workshops, C3P signed a<br />
mandate to support urban<br />
transport in Bhutan.<br />
$74,300 N/A<br />
Activity is ongoing. 135,000 N/A<br />
The activity was approved<br />
recently, and procurement<br />
has now been completed.<br />
The consultants are expected<br />
to commence on the ground<br />
in late April 2012.<br />
$75,000 Yes
Timor-Leste:<br />
Implementation<br />
of PPP Program<br />
Togo:<br />
Development of<br />
a New<br />
Telecommunications<br />
Sector<br />
Policy and<br />
Strategy<br />
West Bank &<br />
Gaza: Southern<br />
West Bank Solid<br />
Waste<br />
Management<br />
Project<br />
Greater private participation, in particular in<br />
infrastructure, is a strategic priority for IFC in Timor-<br />
Leste and in the Pacific. The government of Timor-<br />
Leste is looking to develop key infrastructure and<br />
believes that PPPs may be one way to do so.<br />
However, it is at a very early stage in terms of its<br />
understanding and capacity. The Asian Development<br />
Bank is helping to develop the policy and regulatory<br />
framework for PPPs. The government of Timor-Leste<br />
has asked IFC to assess 22 potential PPP projects,<br />
which include ports, airports, roads, power<br />
generation, water and sanitation, health,<br />
telecommunications, and other areas. Information is<br />
scarce, and it is not clear how many projects may be<br />
financially viable as PPPs. Nevertheless the<br />
government is keen to find practical ways to move<br />
ahead—it is not interested in conducting drawn-out<br />
studies or producing lengthy reports. The overall<br />
objective is therefore to support the government of<br />
Timor-Leste to launch its PPP program and<br />
implement pilot transactions.<br />
To develop a new policy and strategy for the further<br />
liberalization of the telecommunications sector of<br />
Togo.<br />
PPIAF funding would support: 1) technical advisory<br />
services to the Ministry of Posts and<br />
Telecommunications; 2) implementation support in<br />
follow-up projects; 3) drafting a telecommunications<br />
sector policy statement; and 4) development of<br />
related legal instruments.<br />
Due to political and economic instability in the West<br />
Bank & Gaza, the people of the West Bank & Gaza<br />
have suffered years of inadequate infrastructure<br />
investment and poor provision of public services. In<br />
particular, the provision of solid waste management<br />
(―SWM‖) services represents a concern, as<br />
unsanitary waste disposal practices present a serious<br />
public health threat and environmental hazard.<br />
IFC C3P has been solicited to ensure efficient and<br />
appropriate operations and maintenance of a donorfunded<br />
landfill, and will support the Joint Services<br />
Council for Hebron & Bethlehem in attracting private<br />
sector participation for the operation and<br />
maintenance of a SWM project for the Southern West<br />
Bank. PPIAF support is funding the services of a legal<br />
consultant.<br />
8<br />
PPIAF will provide follow-up<br />
support for transaction<br />
advisory costs if C3P is able<br />
to secure a mandate for Dili<br />
Airport, one of the projects<br />
prioritized during the pipeline<br />
screening.<br />
A first report, the draft of the<br />
sector assessment market<br />
analysis, has been prepared<br />
and submitted to the<br />
government for comments.<br />
This activity is supporting the<br />
C3P solid waste mandate in<br />
the West Bank. Procurement<br />
of consultants completed,<br />
and work is now underway.<br />
$74,750 Yes<br />
$130,000 Yes<br />
$199,975 Yes<br />
Total 1,970,561