PROSPECT THEORY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Jonathan Mercer

20 MERCER
1998. International Organization and the
study of world politics. Int. Organ. 52:645–
85
Khong YF. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich,
Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions
of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ.
Press
Kowert PA, Hermann MG. 1997. Who takes
risks? Daring and caution in foreign policy
making. J. Confl. Resolut. 41:611–37
LeBoeuf RA, Shafir E. 2003. Deep thoughts and
shallow frames: on the susceptibility to framing
effects. J. Behav. Decis. Making 16:77–
92
Lebow RN, Stein JG. 1987. Beyond deterrence.
J. Soc. Issues 43(4):5–72
Levi AS, Whyte G. 1997. A cross-cultural exploration
of the reference dependence of crucial
group decisions under risk: Japan’s 1941
decision for war. J. Confl. Resolut. 41:792–
813
Levy JS. 1992. Prospect theory and international
relations: theoretical applications and
analytical problems. Polit. Psychol. 13:283–
310
Levy JS. 1997. Prospect theory, rational choice,
and international relations. Int. Stud. Q. 41:
87–112
Levy JS. 2000. Loss aversion, framing effects,
and international conflict: perspectives from
prospect theory. In Handbook of War Studies
II, ed. MI Midlarsky, 193–221. Ann Arbor:
Univ. Mich. Press
Mastanduno M. 1993. Framing the Japan problem:
the Bush administration and the Structural
Impediments Initiative. See Stein &
Pauly 1993, pp. 35–64
McDermott R. 1998. Risk-Taking in International
Politics: Prospect Theory in American
Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich.
Press
McDermott R. 2001. The psychological ideas
of Amos Tversky and their relevance for political
science. J. Theor. Polit. 13:5–33
McDermott R. 2002. Experimental methods in
political science. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 5:31–
61
McDermott R. 2004. Prospect theory in polit-
ical science: gains and losses from the first
decade. Polit. Psychol. 25:289–312
McDermott R. 2005. The feeling of rationality:
the meaning of neuroscientific advances for
political science. Perspect. Polit. In press
Mercer J. 1996. Reputation and International
Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
Mercer J. 2005. Rationality and psychology in
international politics. Int. Organ. 59(1):In
press
Neral J, Ochs J. 1992. The sequential equilibrium
theory of reputation building: a further
test. Econometrica 60:1151–69
Odean T. 1998. Are investors reluctant to realize
their losses? J. Financ. 53:1775–98.
Reprinted in Kahneman & Tversky 2000, pp.
371–92
Pauly LW. 1993. The political foundations of
multilateral economic surveillance. See Stein
& Pauly 1993, pp. 93–127
Pierson P. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State?
Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.
New York: Cambridge Univ.
Press
Press DG. 2005. Calculating Credibility.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. In press
Rabin M. 1998. Psychology and economics. J.
Econ. Lit. 36:11–46
Rabin M. 2002. A perspective on psychology
and economics. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46:657–85
Read D. 2002. Book review: Choices, Values
and Frames. J. Behav. Decis. Making
15:467–73
Richardson L. 1993. Avoiding and incurring
losses: decision-making in the Suez crisis.
See Stein & Pauly 1993, pp. 170–201
Riker WH. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric:
Campaigning for the American Constitution,
ed. RL Calvert, J Mueller, RK Wilson. New
Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
Schaub G. 2004. Deterrence, compellence, and
prospect theory. Polit. Psychol. 25:389–411
Schelling TC. 1966. Arms and Influence. New
Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
Shafir E, LeBoeuf RA. 2002. Rationality. Annu.
Rev. Psychol. 53:491–517
Shiller RJ. 2000. Irrational Exuberance.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press