Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield - Federation of American ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FM 34-130 1-8 Refines the friendly COA, to include identifying the need for branches and sequels. Determines the probability of success of the friendly COA. The results of wargaming each potential friendly COA against the set of enemy COA models allows the staff to make a recommendation on the best friendly COA. The G2/S2’s recommendation includes an evaluation of the intelligence system’s ability to provide the intelligence needed to support each COA. Appendix A discusses in more detail the relationship between IPB and wargaming. Decision: Following staff recommendations, the commander decides upon a COA and issues implementing orders. He also approves the list of intelligence requirements associated with that COA and identities the most important as priority intelligence requirements (PIR). The command’s collection manager uses the results of IPB to develop and implement a collection plan that will satisfy these requirements (see IPB and the Collection Management Process). Execution: As intelligence confirms or denies planning assumptions on the battlefield environment or the threat’s COA, a continuous IPB process identifies new intelligence requirements. As the battle progresses, IPB is used to continuously evaluate the situation facing the command, driving new iterations of the decision making process and the directing step of the intelligence cycle. For a complete discussion of the decision making process, see FM 101-5.
Decide: Detect: Deliver: FM 34-130 IPB and the Targeting Process The targeting process results in targeting guidance that supports the command’s COA. This guidance generates additional intelligence requirements in support of each potential friendly COA the targeting process supports. As part of COA analysis and comparison, or immediately after, the staff generally starts the targeting process with a targeting conference. Using the results of staff wargaming and IPB as a guide, they decide— What targets to acquire and attack (HPTs). What target selection standards (accuracy and timeliness) to use. Where and when these targets will likely be found (named area of interest [NAI] and TAI). How to attack the targets, based on the commander’s targeting concept. Whether battle damage assessment (BDA) on each target is required to support the commander’s intent or the command’s COA, and how detailed it must be. The targeting team further refines the event templates and matrices to include the information required to support targeting. Figure 1-3 shows an example attack guidance matrix. During this step the command’s collection manager develops collection strategies that will satisfy specific information requirements which support the targeting process. He plans for synchronized collection, focusing on the proper HPT at each phase in the command’s COA. If BDA is required to support the command’s COA, the collection manager plans collection to satisfy that set of requirements as well. Whenever possible, he plans and arranges direct dissemination of targeting intelligence from the collector to the targeting cell or appropriate tire support element (FSE). IPB structures the analysis that enables the G2/S2 to advise the commander and fire support officer (FSO) on the execution of the tire support plan. For a complete discussion of the targeting process, see FM 6-20-10. IPB and the Collection Management Process Collection management synchronizes the activities of organizations and systems to provide intelligence the commander needs to accomplish his COA and targeting efforts. IPB helps the commander identify his intelligence requirements and provides the focus and direction needed to satisfy them. The commander bases his initial intelligence requirements on the critical gaps identified during IPB in the mission analysis step of the decision making process. Refined and updated requirements result from staff wargaming and selection of a particular friendly COA. During staff wargaming, the G2/S2 uses the enemy COA models developed in step 4 of the IPB process to portray the enemy. The remainder of the staff “fights” each potential friendly COA and notes where and when in its execution decisions are required to make the COA successful. They also determine the specific intelligence required to support each decision 1-9
Page 1 and 2: *FM 34-130 i
Page 3 and 4: FM 34-130 iii
Page 5 and 6: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION FM 34-130 If
Page 7 and 8: FM 34-130 circumstances. When facin
Page 9 and 10: FM 34-130 The doctrinal principles
Page 11: FM 34-130 accompany the wargaming s
Page 15 and 16: FM 34-130 IPB products also contrib
Page 17 and 18: FM 34-130 How IPB Relates to Everyt
Page 19 and 20: FM 34-130 2-2 Identify threat capab
Page 21 and 22: FM 34-130 2-4 Population demographi
Page 23 and 24: FM 34-130 2-6 each of the character
Page 25 and 26: FM 34-130 province. The region’s
Page 27 and 28: FM 34-130 2-10 Battle positions. In
Page 29 and 30: FM 34-130 2-12
Page 31 and 32: FM 34-130 2-14 Defending forces see
Page 33 and 34: FM 34-130 2-16 cross-hatching as ap
Page 35 and 36: FM 34-130 2-18 Major obstacles are
Page 37 and 38: FM 34-130 2-20 Normally, identify A
Page 39 and 40: FM 34-130 2-22 Artillery firing pos
Page 41 and 42: FM 34-130 2-24 Winds: Winds of suff
Page 43 and 44: FM 34-130 2-26 You do not have the
Page 45 and 46: FM 34-130 2-28 These other characte
Page 47 and 48: FM 34-130 So What? An evaluation of
Page 49 and 50: FM 34-130 2-32 Construct doctrinal
Page 51 and 52: FM 34-130 2-34 Maneuver. Air defens
Page 53 and 54: FM 34-130 2-36 If his air defense c
Page 55 and 56: FM 34-130 2-38 Additional Considera
Page 57 and 58: FM 34-130 So What? The staff uses t
Page 59 and 60: FM 34-130 2-42 Refine each broad CO
Page 61 and 62: FM 34-130 2-44 EVALUATE AND PRIORIT
Page 63 and 64:
FM 34-130 2-46 systems, and counter
Page 65 and 66:
FM 34-130 2-48 Tailor the situation
Page 67 and 68:
FM 34-130 2-50 Rely on staff expert
Page 69 and 70:
FM 34-130 2-52 Additional Considera
Page 71 and 72:
FM 34-130 2-54 Begin by developing
Page 73 and 74:
FM 34-130 3-2
Page 75 and 76:
FM 34-130 3-4 We establish the AI t
Page 77 and 78:
FM 34-130 3-6 Using the combined ob
Page 79 and 80:
FM 34-130 3-8 Although they have al
Page 81 and 82:
FM 34-130 3-10 Using the defensible
Page 83 and 84:
FM 34-130 3-12 Even though we expec
Page 85 and 86:
FM 34-130 3-14 We also identify the
Page 87 and 88:
FM 34-130 3-16 We compare the criti
Page 89 and 90:
FM 34-130 3-18 Here, we identify th
Page 91 and 92:
FM 34-130 3-20 To identify the like
Page 93 and 94:
FM 34-130 3-22 The threat model alr
Page 95 and 96:
FM 34-130 3-24 Since the threat mod
Page 97 and 98:
FM 34-130 3-26 As enemy COA 1, we p
Page 99 and 100:
FM 34-130 3-28 Obviously, the enemy
Page 101 and 102:
FM 34-130 3-30 We continue to devel
Page 103 and 104:
FM 34-130 3-32 We also refine the l
Page 105 and 106:
FM 34-130 3-34 We examine the situa
Page 107 and 108:
FM 34-130 3-36 We evaluate the COA
Page 109 and 110:
FM 34-130 3-38 DISSEMINATE, USE, AN
Page 111 and 112:
FM 34-130 3-40 The EW officer uses
Page 113 and 114:
FM 34-130 3-42 The chemical section
Page 115 and 116:
FM 34-130 3-44 DEFINE THE BATTLEFIE
Page 117 and 118:
FM 34-130 3-46 There are few obstac
Page 119 and 120:
FM 34-130 3-48 EVALUATE THE THREAT
Page 121 and 122:
FM 34-130 3-50
Page 123 and 124:
FM 34-130 3-52 We create a matrix t
Page 125 and 126:
FM 34-130 3-54 We prepare an event
Page 127 and 128:
FM 34-130 3-56 DEFINE THE BATTLEFIE
Page 129 and 130:
FM 34-130 3-58 Although unusual, th
Page 131 and 132:
FM 34-130 3-60 The S2 decided that
Page 133 and 134:
FM 34-130 3-62
Page 135 and 136:
FM 34-130 3-64
Page 137 and 138:
FM 34-130 3-66 Using all the inform
Page 139 and 140:
FM 34-130 3-68
Page 141 and 142:
FM 34-130 3-70 The section does the
Page 143 and 144:
FM 34-130 3-72 DETERMINE THREAT COU
Page 145 and 146:
FM 34-130 3-74 relatively limited n
Page 147 and 148:
FM 34-130 3-76 Scenario Four: Nonco
Page 149 and 150:
FM 34-130 3-78 The AI includes our
Page 151 and 152:
FM 34-130 3-80 We examine how the b
Page 153 and 154:
FM 34-130 3-82 Although both rebel
Page 155 and 156:
FM 34-130 3-84 EVALUATE THE THREAT
Page 157 and 158:
FM 34-130 3-86 We also conduct a ti
Page 159 and 160:
FM 34-130 3-88 We use similar techn
Page 161 and 162:
FM 34-130 3-90 The situation templa
Page 163 and 164:
FM 34-130 4-2 Probable target insta
Page 165 and 166:
FM 34-130 4-4 Refine standard threa
Page 167 and 168:
FM 34-130 4-6 Evaluate the Threat:
Page 169 and 170:
FM 34-130 4-8 How long does it take
Page 171 and 172:
FM 34-130 4-10 Remoting of communic
Page 173 and 174:
FM 34-130 4-12 Obstacle placement.
Page 175 and 176:
FM 34-130 4-14 LOS characteristics
Page 177 and 178:
FM 34-130 4-16 Indicators of prepar
Page 179 and 180:
FM 34-130 4-18 Describe the Battlef
Page 181 and 182:
FM 34-130 4-20 Identify terrain tha
Page 183 and 184:
FM 34-130 4-22 Request for commitme
Page 185 and 186:
FM 34-130 5-2 As tactical units ope
Page 187 and 188:
FM 34-130 5-4 lines, but two intern
Page 189 and 190:
FM 34-130 5-6 Determine Threat Cour
Page 191 and 192:
CHAPTER 6 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION
Page 193 and 194:
FM 34-130 Evaluate the Threat: Cons
Page 195 and 196:
FM 34-130 Identify narco-terrorist
Page 197 and 198:
FM 34-130 Weather may affect the tu
Page 199 and 200:
FM 34-130 Group skills and specialt
Page 201 and 202:
FM 34-130 Current position, attitud
Page 203 and 204:
FM 34-130 Noncombatant Evacuation O
Page 205 and 206:
FM 34-130 Determine Threat Courses
Page 207 and 208:
FM 34-130 when the situation requir
Page 209 and 210:
FM 34-130 Techniques for applying I
Page 211 and 212:
FM 34-130 A-2 General Rules The rel
Page 213 and 214:
FM 34-130 A-4 Artillery barrages ag
Page 215 and 216:
FM 34-130 A-6
Page 217 and 218:
FM 34-130 A-8 single intelligence r
Page 219 and 220:
FM 34-130 A-10 the S2 learns that a
Page 221 and 222:
FM 34-130 A-12 On order, C Company
Page 223 and 224:
FM 34-130 A-14 Summary The synchron
Page 225 and 226:
FM 34-130 B-2 Describe the Battlefi
Page 227 and 228:
FM 34-130 B-4 The “tactics” por
Page 229 and 230:
FM 34-130 B-6 Alternate and supplem
Page 231 and 232:
FM 34-130 B-8
Page 233 and 234:
FM 34-130 B-10
Page 235 and 236:
FM 34-130 B-12
Page 237 and 238:
FM 34-130 B-14
Page 239 and 240:
FM 34-130 B-16
Page 241 and 242:
FM 34-130 B-18
Page 243 and 244:
FM 34-130 B-20
Page 245 and 246:
FM 34-130 B-22
Page 247 and 248:
FM 34-130 B-24
Page 249 and 250:
FM 34-130 B-26
Page 251 and 252:
FM 34-130 B-28
Page 253 and 254:
FM 34-130 B-30
Page 255 and 256:
FM 34-130 B-32
Page 257 and 258:
FM 34-130 B-34
Page 259 and 260:
FM 34-130 B-36
Page 261 and 262:
FM 34-130 B-38
Page 263 and 264:
FM 34-130 fp/s FRAGO FRG FS FSB FSE
Page 265 and 266:
FM 34-130 Area of interest - The ge
Page 267 and 268:
FM 34-130 elements such as enemy fo
Page 269 and 270:
FM 34-130 Line of departure (LD) -
Page 271 and 272:
FM 34-130 Situation map - A recordi
Page 273 and 274:
REFERENCES SOURCES USED These are t
Page 275 and 276:
INDEX FM 34-130 Index-1
Page 277 and 278:
FM 34-130 Index-3
Page 279:
By Order of the Secretary of the Ar
show all

Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield - Federation of American ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?