MBR ISSUE 44

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Malta Business Review FINTECH Regulation of FinTech must strike a better balance between market stimulation and the security and stability of the financial and economic system By Jasmin Klötzing The EESC believes that the European Commission's Action Plan is a good basis but that additional measures are needed to tap the full potential of financial technology and to ensure certainty and protection for all market participants. The measures proposed by the European Commission concerning the development of financial technology (FinTech) within the European financial sector must be adjusted so as to balance market stimulation and the security and stability of the financial and economic system. The overall aim must be to ensure certainty and protection as well as fair and equal market conditions for all market participants. The EESC is strongly convinced that FinTech, in an appropriate legal framework, can deliver benefits to European businesses and their clients, contributing to a more competitive and innovative European financial sector. "FinTech players should be subject to the same rules as the financial sector, particularly as regards resilience, cyber security and supervision", said Petru Sorin Dandea, rapporteur for the EESC opinion on the proposals of the so-called FinTech Action Plan. "We must follow the principle of 'same risk, same rules, same supervision'", he said. In addition, the Committee is calling for rules to ensure uniform development of FinTech in the EU. Despite its reservations, the EESC supports the Commission's action plan. It believes that the plan could be instrumental as regards "National supervisors are closer to national markets and can better assess local circumstances. The Commission should thus consider allocating them a substantial supervisory role. deepening and broadening the capital markets by integrating digitisation, and that it could serve as a stimulus for small and medium-sized enterprises active in the financial sector, as it can facilitate their access to finance. The action plan could thus contribute to the completion of the capital markets union, Economic and Monetary Union and the Digital Single Market, priorities that are strongly championed by the EESC. Concerning the right to portability of personal data, the EESC believes that this must be implemented in a manner that is compatible with the new Payment Services Directive (PSD2). This would ensure that a level playing field is achieved as regards access to customer data under PSD2 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The EESC would point out the need to clarify the responsibility of companies offering cloud services as regards protecting the personal data they host. Possible rules should be identified by the Commission. Further recommendations expressed in the Committee's opinion concern crypto-assets and the impact of innovative technologies on the labour market in the financial sector. The EESC recommends that the European Commission together with the European supervisory authorities keeps a close eye on the growth and the high degree of volatility of cryptoassets and addresses any issue concerning this matter that could threaten the security and stability of the financial and economic system. As regards the impact on the labour market, the Committee calls on the Member States to design and implement active labour market measures enabling workers who lose their jobs to take up new jobs. In line with its opinion on the FinTech Action Plan, the EESC strongly welcomes the Commission's proposals for an enabling framework for crowdfunding. It believes that artificial obstacles should not act as a brake on the new framework. It is therefore calling for even stronger proposals and additional measures. Nevertheless, the Commission proposals would be a major step forward, as they provide new opportunities and more certainty and protection for service providers, businesses and investors. With regard to stronger proposals and additional measures, Daniel Mareels, rapporteur for the EESC opinion on Crowd and peer-to-peer finance, said: "At least in the initial stages, there should be an even stronger focus on risk aspects associated with crowdfunding operations and markets in order to better identify them or mitigate them where possible and to ensure certainty and protection for all concerned parties". Market deregulation would constitute higher risks for investors and could create an uneven playing field with traditional financial service providers. Other areas of tension could be the status of providers and their services and the unclear role of national supervisory bodies. Apart from that, the coexistence of European and national regimes may give rise to confusion and uncertainty. In order to ensure clarity, additional obligations on authorities and supervisors to provide accurate, easily accessible information for all users or the obligatory use of the "EU label" for service providers could be options. In its opinion, the EESC also urges the European Commission to (better) address the issues of money laundering, terrorism financing and taxation related to crowdfunding. It questions the limited possibility for subjecting crowdfunding platforms to existing rules on money laundering and terrorism financing and the restriction to finance projects only up to an amount of EUR 1 million. Finally, the Committee encourages the introduction of provisions to regularly monitor, evaluate and measure the success of the proposed EU regime. Consultations and dialogue with all stakeholders and interested parties would be desirable. <strong>MBR</strong> Creditline: EESC Press Unit 46
EXECUTIVE LIFESTYLE Malta Business Review Blockchain in Action in Corporate Banking by Alenka Grealish “And they’re off” is the most succinct way to describe the status of blockchain-based initiatives in commercial banking. The race to scale production is on and will be a marathon, not a sprint. Key Research Questions: • What use cases are approaching the golden triangle of value, feasibility, and viability? • Who are the payments contenders? • Who are the trade finance contenders? Abstract: Blockchain in corporate banking is moving from experiment to live transactions, proving value and feasibility but not yet demonstrating viability (e.g., scale). Celent showcases 12 contenders in payments, trade finance, and syndicated loans. Early movers have gone from proofs of concept to pilots and production. The production launches are currently relatively small initiatives. Most initiatives are digitizing processes, that is, carrying messages or documents. Only a very few are using digital assets as a medium to exchange value. The next 18 months will be a critical period to attract service providers and end users. In parallel, blockchain and DLT platform providers are working fervently on improving scale and speed with the goal of staying one step ahead of the needs of application providers. Celent has selected 12 contenders to profile based on their progress toward winning medals in value, feasibility, and viability as well as the calibre of their people and participants. • Five in cross-border payments with the first three in production: Ripple, Stellar, IBM World Wire, JPM Interbank Information Network, and Visa B2B Connect. • Six in trade finance with the first two in production: we.trade, India Trade Connect, TradeIX, Skuchain, Voltron, and Centrifuge. • One in syndicated lending in production:Fusion LenderComm by Finastra. <strong>MBR</strong> Creditline: Celent PR & Digital; Celent, a division of Oliver Wyman www.maltabusinessreview.net 47
Page 1 and 2: COVER STORY INTERVIEW Making Invest
Page 3 and 4: Together we thrive
Page 5 and 6: COVER STORY Making Investments Easy
Page 7 and 8: COVER STORY INTERVIEW Malta Busines
Page 9 and 10: MALTA PENSION SOLUTIONS PENSIONS GL
Page 11 and 12: Your Corporate Travel Partner all o
Page 13 and 14: INTERVIEW OF THE MONTH Malta Busine
Page 15 and 16: Malta Business Review Wealth manage
Page 17 and 18: Beyond Ordinary Charter Experiences
Page 19 and 20: BANKING NEWS Malta Business Review
Page 21 and 22: TRANSPORT & LOGISTICS Malta Busines
Page 23 and 24: HEALTHCARE Malta Business Review An
Page 25 and 26: Malta Business Review www.maltabusi
Page 27 and 28: AZURE ULTRA Malta Business Review A
Page 30 and 31: Malta Business Review POLITICO CONN
Page 32 and 33: Malta Business Review ERP SOFTWARE
Page 34 and 35: Malta Business Review SPECIAL REPOR
Page 36 and 37: Malta Business Review GAMING INTERV
Page 38 and 39: Malta Business Review eCOMMERCE DHL
Page 40 and 41: Malta Business Review VENTURE CAPIT
Page 42 and 43: Malta Business Review GAMING MGA -
Page 44 and 45: Malta Business Review BANKING REPOR
Page 48 and 49: Malta Business Review THE LINESMAN
Page 50 and 51: Malta Business Review WOMEN'S RIGHT
Page 52 and 53: Malta Business Review DEBATE Why Ar
Page 54 and 55: Malta Business Review BUILDING & CO
Page 56 and 57: Malta Business Review SOCIETY On th
Page 58: Malta Business Review NEWSMAKERS A

MBR ISSUE 44

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?