13.02.2019 Views

FM JANUARY 2019 - digital edition

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The most recent evidence examined<br />

by the Task Force continues to show a<br />

close balance between these potential<br />

benefits and harms.<br />

The Guideline reflects the growing<br />

importance of shared decision-making<br />

between patients and physicians in<br />

preventive health screening, especially<br />

in situations like this where the balance<br />

between potential benefits and harms is<br />

not certain.<br />

Meanwhile, screening is<br />

recommended in women aged 50-74.<br />

The Guideline, developed by the<br />

Task Force, an independent body of<br />

primary care and prevention experts, has<br />

been published in the Canadian Medical<br />

Association Journal (CMAJ).<br />

Other screening modalities<br />

The Task Force recommends not using<br />

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),<br />

tomosynthesis or ultrasound to screen<br />

for breast cancer in women not at<br />

increased risk. (Strong recommendation;<br />

no evidence)<br />

THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT<br />

PERFORMING BREAST<br />

SELF-EXAMINATION HAS<br />

NO IMPACT ON BREAST<br />

CANCER MORTALITY<br />

We recommend not performing<br />

clinical breast examinations to<br />

screen for breast cancer. (Conditional<br />

recommendation; no evidence)<br />

It recommends not advising women<br />

to practice breast self-examination to<br />

screen for breast cancer. (Conditional<br />

recommendation; low-certainty<br />

evidence)<br />

There was an absence of evidence<br />

on clinical outcomes of screening by<br />

magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound,<br />

<strong>digital</strong> breast tomosynthesis or clinical<br />

breast examination, and there was<br />

evidence that performing breast selfexamination<br />

has no impact on breast<br />

cancer mortality.<br />

However, the Task Force noted that<br />

better-quality evidence is needed on the<br />

impact of breast cancer screening for<br />

women of all ages. Additional studies<br />

on Canadian women’s values and<br />

preferences for screening that are based<br />

on accurate estimates of both benefits<br />

and harms, conducted in a transparent<br />

and easily comparable manner, would<br />

help guide future recommendations.<br />

This clinical practice guideline<br />

has been endorsed by the Nurse<br />

Practitioners’ Association of Canada<br />

(NPAC).<br />

The Canadian Task Force on<br />

Preventive Health Care was established<br />

to develop clinical practice guidelines<br />

that support primary care providers<br />

in delivering preventive health care.<br />

The mandate of the Task Force is to<br />

develop and disseminate clinical practice<br />

guidelines for primary and preventive<br />

care, based on a systematic analysis of<br />

scientific evidence.<br />

74 / FUTURE MEDICINE / <strong>JANUARY</strong> <strong>2019</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!