18.12.2012 Views

alternative fuels for medium-speed diesel engines (affmsde) project

alternative fuels for medium-speed diesel engines (affmsde) project

alternative fuels for medium-speed diesel engines (affmsde) project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I IIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII<br />

DE83002565<br />

One Source. One Search. One Solution.<br />

ALTERNATIVE FUELS FOR MEDIUM-SPEED DIESEL<br />

ENGINES (AFFMSDE) PROJECT: A BASELINE<br />

PROGRAM PLANNING CONCEPT FOR REVIEW AND<br />

REVISION. FINAL REPORT<br />

E:F TECHNOLOGY, INC.<br />

ST. JOHNS, MI<br />

JUN 1982<br />

U.S. Department of Commerce<br />

National Technical In<strong>for</strong>mation Service


One Source. One Search. One Solution.<br />

Providing Permanent, Easy Access<br />

to U.S. Government In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

National Technical In<strong>for</strong>mation Service is the nation's<br />

largest repository and disseminator of government-<br />

initiated scientific, technical, engineering, and related<br />

business in<strong>for</strong>mation. The NTIS collection includes<br />

almost 3,000,000 in<strong>for</strong>mation products in a variety of<br />

<strong>for</strong>mats: electronic download, online access, CD-<br />

ROM, magnetic tape, diskette, multimedia, microfiche<br />

and paper.<br />

Search the NTIS Database from 1990 <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

NTIS has upgraded its bibliographic database system and has made all entries since<br />

1990 searchable on www.ntis.gov. You now have access to in<strong>for</strong>mation on more than<br />

600,000 government research in<strong>for</strong>mation products from this web site.<br />

Link to Full Text Documents at Government Web Sites<br />

Because many Government agencies have their most recent reports available on their<br />

own web site, we have added links directly to these reports. When available, you will<br />

see a link on the right side of the bibliographic screen.<br />

Download Publications (1997 - Present)<br />

NTIS can now provides the full text of reports as downloadable PDF files. This means<br />

that when an agency stops maintaining a report on the web, NTIS will offer a<br />

downloadable version. There is a nominal fee <strong>for</strong> each download <strong>for</strong> most publications.<br />

For more in<strong>for</strong>mation visit our website:<br />

www.ntis.gov<br />

. ,~-~,~<br />

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE<br />

Technology Administration<br />

National Technical In<strong>for</strong>mation Service<br />

Springfield, VA 22161


DE83002565<br />

I IIllllltlllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllll[lllllIIIIl


DE83002565<br />

I IIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIltlIIIlflIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII<br />

DOE/CS/50048-'I" I<br />

The Alternative Fuels <strong>for</strong><br />

Medium-Speed Diesel Engines {AFFMSDE) Project:<br />

E:F TECHNOLOGY INC.<br />

Teleplnone (517) 224-3268<br />

A Baseline Program Planning Concept<br />

<strong>for</strong> Review and Revision<br />

Prepared by:<br />

E:F Technology, Inc.<br />

St. Johns, Michigan<br />

FINAL REPORT<br />

under<br />

N~TICE<br />

U.S Department of Energy<br />

Contract No. DE-ACO2-81C$50048.MO02<br />

June 1982<br />

PORT!gR£ ~---' :~ ~E?9~T .~RE !LLEG|~3LE. It<br />

:;~y to p;;;;!2;'.:~ '2 - 2: .,:css;b;e ava:,l-<br />

"!'iHt'i.<br />

~ISTR!gUT:?': "-': !~:2- i<br />

P.O. Box 189<br />

St. Johns. MI 48879-0189<br />

..... 1 ", " ~'-" ,"~-<br />

', "-" IT .'3 ~' ..........


Medium<br />

DOZ/CS/500 z ~;~ ~ -~ _.%<br />

DZ83 002555<br />

___________~E/CS150048-1"~'~<br />

The Alternative Fuels <strong>for</strong><br />

Speed Diesel Engines (AFFMSDE) Project:<br />

A Baseline Program Planning Concept<br />

<strong>for</strong> Review and Revision<br />

NOT',CE<br />

PORTIONS OF 7F'.~ .~ =~9.~ ~ ~,P, ...........<br />

~'it'/,<br />

Prepared by:<br />

E:F Technology, Inc.<br />

St. Johns, Michigan<br />

FINAL REPC)RT<br />

under<br />

U.S Department of Energy<br />

Contract No. DE-AC02-81CSSOO48.MO02<br />

June 1982<br />

DIST~IBUTIO~'~ OF TH!S .... ,-,--.,T t~ tJ~'~LIMiTED


Suction i - 5U~.t~t%RY<br />

Section 2 - INTRODUCTION<br />

2. ! Program Background<br />

2.2 Accomplishments<br />

2.3 Purlxose of Thls Document<br />

2.4 Contents<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

SectioD 3- SUGGESTED PROGR~M O~ECTIVES, REQUIREMENTS, AND<br />

PRIORITIES DISCUSSION<br />

3. ! Objectives<br />

3. 2 Re,i~iremen ts<br />

3. ? Priority Considerations<br />

Section 4 - A SUGGESTED MULTI-Y~A_R RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND<br />

OPERATIONAL DE~IONSTP~TION PROG.R~%51 PLAN<br />

a. 1 Ce~eral comments and Obsez-vations<br />

4.1.1 Scope of Objectives Suggested<br />

4.1.2 AntLcipated Management Problems<br />

4.1.3 Planned In<strong>for</strong>mation Disseminat=c.q<br />

4.1.4 Addltiona! Program Components Suggested<br />

~.2 Supporting Tasks Component<br />

~.3 Planned In<strong>for</strong>~ation Dissemination Components<br />

4.4 The Multi-Year Research, D~velol~en~., and Operat~onai<br />

De_monsr_ration Progr~m Project<br />

4.4.1 Basic Logic of Activity Areas<br />

4.4.2 Basic Logic or RiD zn Stationary Enqines<br />

4.4.3 B~sic Loqic of O}~erational Demonstrdt~o~,<br />

4.4.4 Work Areas<br />

• -. 5 The_ Program P!~n Proposed<br />

-~.5.1<br />

4.5.2<br />

5.3<br />

4.5.4<br />

A Concept <strong>for</strong> :


Section 6 - MANAG~.~NT APPROACH<br />

Section 7 - BUDGETARY ESTi~.~TES<br />

7.1 Basic Project Budget<br />

7.2 Cash Flow Requirements<br />

Section 8 - ~ECO~.~T/~DATXONS<br />

Figure 1<br />

Figure 2<br />

Figure 3<br />

Ficure 4<br />

Pl~urc 5<br />

Figure 6<br />

Ficure 7<br />

Figure 8<br />

Figure 9<br />

Figure !0<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Electro-Motive Division 2-Cylinder, 567 Cubic Inches/<br />

Cylinder, Normally Aspirated Research Test Engine at<br />

Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas<br />

The Rail Motive Power Laboratory at Sou~'_hwest Research<br />

Imstztute Consisting of a 12-Cy!inder Turbocharged General<br />

Electric 7FDL Medium-Speed Diesel Engine and an Electro-<br />

Motive Division of General Motors 12-Cylinder Turbocharged<br />

645 E3B Medium-Speed Diesel Engine<br />

Control Room of the AAR/Southwest Research Institute<br />

Rail Motive Power Laboratory<br />

Examples of Classes of Alternative Fuels and Some<br />

Examples of Such Fuels<br />

Presently Prol~sed Areas of Investigation Comprising the<br />

Al~ernative Fuels <strong>for</strong> Medium-Speed Diesel Engines (AFF~DE)<br />

Pro3ect Ac~ivities<br />

Progressive Levels of Testing cf Alternative Fuel Systems<br />

in 2-Cylinder Stationary, Multi-Cylinder Stationary and<br />

Rail Operating Environments<br />

Proposed Multi-Year Program Planning Concept <strong>for</strong> the<br />

AFF~DE Program<br />

Xodified SD45-2 Alternative Fuels Research Motive Power Unit<br />

PERT/CPM Chart<br />

AFFMSDE Management Structure Suggested by Recent and<br />

Pro!~osed SwF_I end ,~-%R Initiatives<br />

ii<br />

C~<br />

Page<br />

27<br />

29<br />

29<br />

29<br />

32<br />

15<br />

16<br />

18<br />

20<br />

24<br />

25<br />

28


LIST OF FIGURES, Continued<br />

Figure ll Basic Budgetary Estimates t,f the Multi-Year AFF~L~DE<br />

Program<br />

Figure 12 Cash Flow Requirements Es~ima=es ~f the Multi-Year<br />

AFFMSDE Program<br />

iia<br />

Page<br />

30<br />

31


Section l<br />

SUMMARY<br />

The major problem that is implicit in this multi-year, essentially<br />

vol~tarily supported program is t/%e maintenance of voluntary support <strong>for</strong><br />

what is an ambitious, technically difficult and large-scale program.<br />

It as st/~ngly suggested that the development and <strong>for</strong>mal adoption, by<br />

all ~-~rticipants, of a multi-year Program Management Plan might provide a<br />

means of focusing attention on r_his difficult management aspect and thus a<br />

means of contributing to developing a commitment to support of the program<br />

<strong>for</strong> its fL~ll duration and to achieving the final objectives sought.<br />

Whatever the results of the program activities, they must be accompanied<br />

by tne effective dissemination of in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding all program findings.<br />

It is recommended that this problem receive specific attention and that a<br />

planned approach zo in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemination be developed and maintained.<br />

The reader should remember that during the past four years of the AFFMSDE<br />

program, theze have been a number of "gluts" in petroleum supply. At this<br />

time, another such "glut" is coming to an end. However, in the present<br />

circumstances, there are indications that the price of petroleum <strong>fuels</strong> may<br />

not rise significantly <strong>for</strong> some time in the fu~:ure because of inter-hal<br />

discord in the OPEC producing nations. On the other hand, the inherent<br />

instability of the Middle East has never been more apparent than it is<br />

today. The potential signiflcance of the proposed program to the U.S.<br />

rail indusUy in this period of uncertainty of continued supply of crude<br />

oil from <strong>for</strong>eign producers is obvious.<br />

The purpose of this document is to provide some suggestions and recommend-<br />

ations <strong>for</strong> thu long-term continuation of the Alternative Fuels <strong>for</strong> Medium<br />

Speed Diesel Engines (AFFMSDE) Program as program supi~rt transitions from<br />

government to industry.<br />

The ~.:Jlti-Year Program Manag~nent Plan presented here is a suggested<br />

baseline concept. If it is subject to review, revision, and expansion in<br />

detail by contribution of all program participants, it might provide assistance<br />

in developing long-term, planned, commitment to supporting and maintai:~ing<br />

continuity of management that these types of program require.


J ,<br />

f<br />

I<br />

l<br />

d<br />

J<br />

;L~ "<br />

• ' "'~L<br />

Fig. Electro-Motive Divisien 2 Cylinder, 567 Cubic Inches/Cylinder,<br />

Normally Aspirated Research Test Engine at Southwest Research<br />

~ns,ltute in San Antonio, Texaa.


6~<br />

lllitl<br />

/<br />

Fig. 2<br />

£-,~.<br />

,r,<br />

iFi.,o~ '.~i " I<br />

i;:ii, !,'J<br />

• r<br />

~,4 .'~-<br />

'*'i I , • :.<br />

The Rail Hotive Power Laboratory at SouLhwest Research InstJLuLe consisting of<br />

a 12 Cylinder Turbocharged General Electric 7FDL <strong>medium</strong> <strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> engine and<br />

an ElecLro-HoLive Divison of General Motors 12 Cylinder, Turbocharged 645 E3B<br />

<strong>medium</strong> <strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> engine.<br />

#<br />

IV*~ i , .~......,',w<br />

"~',.~,.C;~ i:. '<br />

i


Fig. 3<br />

Control Room of the AAR/Southwest Research Institute Ra|l Motive<br />

Power Laboratory.


2.1 Program Background<br />

Section 2<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Alternative Fuels <strong>for</strong> Medium-Spee~ Diesel Engines (AFF~DE) Program<br />

was initially funded by the Non-Highway Transportation Systems Branch of the<br />

U.S. Department of Energy in August 1978. The general objective of the pro-<br />

gram was to iaentify means of conserving petroleum resources through two<br />

strategies. First, t~,rough the use of petroleum-based <strong>fuels</strong> with properties<br />

deviating significantly from conventional specification <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>fuels</strong>. Secondly,<br />

through the use of fossil <strong>fuels</strong> not derived from petroleum.<br />

!~: "??9, the: !.'ederal Railroad Administration of the U.S. Departmen~ of<br />

Trans!~ort~tion (DOT/FRA) and the Association of American Railroads (AAR)<br />

joined the 2rogrmm ef<strong>for</strong>t providing additional financial support.<br />

Member railroads of the AAR contributed two rail <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong>--a 12-<br />

cylinder General Electric (GE) 7FDL turbosupercharged <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> engine and<br />

a General Motors (GM) Electro-Motive Division 12-cylinder turbosupercharged<br />

645 E3B <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> engine--to the <strong>project</strong>. These <strong>engines</strong> were deliv-<br />

ered to Southwest Research Institute (SwR!) in 1980.<br />

SwRI contributed all facilities, operational support and instrumentation<br />

systems equipment needed to complete the installation of these two <strong>engines</strong> in<br />

SwRi's facilities at San Antonio, Texas. This multi-cylinder Rail Motive<br />

£;ower iaboratory is supported by an already existing 2-cylinder GM/F/4D Model<br />

567 research engine installation.<br />

2 - 2 Accomplishments<br />

The characteristics of operation of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> on petro-<br />

leum-based <strong>fuels</strong> with significant deviation from ~he Diesel No- 2 specifica-<br />

uion property limit have been investigated and the findings documented.<br />

The characteristics of operating <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> on fuel<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms representative of syn<strong>fuels</strong> or <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> derived from non-petroleum<br />

foss~l resources have been studied and the findings have been reported.<br />

A full-scale rail engine research facility has been created. This facil-<br />

ity is capable of running 2-cylinder and multi-cylinder <strong>engines</strong>, <strong>fuels</strong>, lubri-<br />

5


cants, additlves, and equipment research and development programs using repre-<br />

aentative <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> equipment of contempordry design. This facility<br />

is su}~l~rted by [Jersonnel exl~erienced in <strong>fuels</strong> research and technology, lubri-<br />

cants research and technology, combustion and emissions research, and the<br />

design development, and evaluation of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> engine equipment<br />

s~,stems and subsystems.<br />

2.3 Purpose of This Document<br />

Continuing funding support of the AFFMSDE Program by DOE and DOT/FRA is<br />

being curtailed. The program wil! be continued by the Association of ~meri-<br />

can Railroads and its member lines.<br />

The purpose of this document is to provide some suggestions and recommen-<br />

dations <strong>for</strong> the long-term continuation of this program as this support transi-<br />

tion is made from government to industry.<br />

Th~ Multi-Year approach to Program Management Planning presented here is<br />

a suggested baseline concept. If it is subjected to review, revision, and<br />

expansion in detail by all program participants, it migl~t provide some assis-<br />

tance in developing long-te~m, planned, support and continuity of management<br />

that progra/ns of this type require.<br />

2.4 Contents<br />

This document is a major revision of the "Alternative Fuels foL ~;edium-<br />

Speed Diesel Engines: Project Management Master Plan" of AEril 1979, as pre-<br />

i~red by Escher Technology Associates, Inc., in accord with the <strong>for</strong>mat recom-<br />

mendations of DOT/FRA. The immediately following section, Section 3, presents<br />

suggested program ob3ectives , requirements zesultlng from these objectives,<br />

and a discuss&cn of prioritization of program objectives and requirements.<br />

A Program Plan Proposal is presented in Section 4_ The proposed program plan<br />

embraces three major areas of activities:<br />

• Supporting Tasks<br />

• Planned In<strong>for</strong>mation Dissemination<br />

Research, Development and Operational Demonstration<br />

Activities.<br />

6


The remaining sections are comprised of brief discussions of program<br />

products and/or deliverables <strong>project</strong>ed, a suggested basic management approach,<br />

generalized budgetary estima%es, and principal recommendations from all of the<br />

above.<br />

7


Section 3<br />

SUGGESTED PROGRAM OBJECTIVES, REQUIREMENTS, AND PRIGRITIES DISCUSSION<br />

3.1 Ob3ec~ives<br />

The basic scope of the AFFMSDE Program is concerned exclusively with<br />

energy-related aspects of operation of the <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> in<br />

rail motive power units. The program has not been concerned, and it is recom-<br />

mended that it should not be concerned, with improvements related to opera-<br />

tzonal a:tivities in rail motive power unit use. There is an exception to<br />

~his consideration. This exception is in consideration of the problems of<br />

operation using <strong>alternative</strong> fuel systems as they affect the original equipment<br />

manufacturers, operating companies utilizing such systems, and the production,<br />

distribution, storage, and delivery of non-petroleum based <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong><br />

by manufacturers of such <strong>fuels</strong>.<br />

The overall objectives of the AFFMSDE Program are:<br />

I. To zdentify problems, and to develop technical approaches in solution<br />

of those problems, associated with rail line operation of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong><br />

<strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> on:<br />

• <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> derived from petroieum with properties significantly<br />

deviating from conventional specification <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>fuels</strong><br />

• <strong>fuels</strong> derived from "syncrudes" from coal, oil shale, and tar sands<br />

• <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong>, the use of which may be required because of a<br />

lack of adequate supplies of <strong>fuels</strong>, petroleum, coal, oil shale, and<br />

tar sands resources.<br />

2. To identify the nature of, and quantify to the extent appropriate and<br />

~ractical, the problems of operation on <strong>alternative</strong> fuel systems that<br />

will be encountered by original equipment manufacturers and rail line<br />

operating companies utilizing such fuel systems<br />

3. To effectively disseminate in<strong>for</strong>mation resulting from r_he activities of<br />

the AFFMSDE Project.<br />

3.2 Requirements<br />

In order to achieve the overall <strong>project</strong> objectives, the program of work<br />

comprising t_he AFF~-SDE Program Planning Concept pzesented herein provides<br />

an arrangement of activities which meet or fulfill the following requirements:


i.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

To provide an orderly identification of the problems associated with<br />

the operation of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> on <strong>alternative</strong> fuel <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

To identify technological approaches to the solution of these problems<br />

To evaluate the adequacy of these approaches by operation of two-cylinder<br />

stationary, multi-cylinder stationary, and rail motive power equipment<br />

systems on such alnernative fuel <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

To provide an orderly identification of the problems associated with the<br />

conversion of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> to <strong>alternative</strong> fuel <strong>for</strong>ms that<br />

will be encountered by original equipment manufacturers<br />

To provide a similar identification of such problems as they would be<br />

encountered by rail line operating companies using such <strong>engines</strong> converted<br />

uo operauion on such fuel <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

To provide an orderly program of planned in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemination to be<br />

executed that will assure the in<strong>for</strong>mation resulting from the AFFMSDE<br />

<strong>project</strong> will be available to appropriate individuals in those industries<br />

that may make use of the investigated fuel <strong>for</strong>ms in <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong><br />

~ngines.<br />

3.3 Priority Considerations<br />

It is suggested that all program activities proposed should be evaluated<br />

in terms of the following priority considerations :<br />

i. To reduce direct costs of rail operating companies<br />

2. To assure the maximum probability of the ability to continue to operate<br />

under the broadest range of fuel availability scenarios possible<br />

3. To conserve petroleum fuel resources<br />

4. To conserve fossil fuel resources.<br />

It must be noted that if priority No. 1 is the only consideration, the<br />

resultimg program of activities will be of narrow scope and will be concerned<br />

only with the near-term. It is suggested that ,~ii priorities must be consid-<br />

ered and that available resources should be reasonably apportioned between<br />

activities that fall in all four priority categories.


Section 4<br />

A,SUGGESTED MULTI-YEAR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATIONAL<br />

DEMONSTRATION'"'PROGRAM PLAN<br />

q.l General Comments and Observations<br />

4.1.1 Scope of Ob3ectives suggested<br />

To date, t-he scope of work on the AFFMSDE Program has been concerned with<br />

types of operations that can generally be classified as being "research"<br />

oriented. Tasks accomplished to date have been concerned with identifying<br />

the combustion characteristics and the per<strong>for</strong>mance of various <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong><br />

introduced into <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> engine combustion systems using a variety<br />

of approaches. Injector systems, emulsifiers, etc., have been constructed to<br />

satisfy experimental ob]ectiveso This hardware and equipment has not been<br />

designed to meet the requirements of operating rail equipment systems.<br />

If the program is to evolve out of research-oriented activities in the<br />

fields of combustion and engine per<strong>for</strong>mance, the next logical step is the<br />

development of selected <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong>/engine equipment systems capable of<br />

sustained operation with per<strong>for</strong>mance, reliability, and maintainability charac-<br />

teristics appropriate to rail operational use.<br />

If the AFFMSDE Program is to continue beyond the developmental phase, the<br />

program objective would logically expand to include demonstration of the use<br />

of these selected <strong>alternative</strong> fuel systems in representative rail operating<br />

environments.<br />

4.1.2 Anticipated Management Problems<br />

Even if the AFFMSDE Program were to begin to be managed as a pre-planned,<br />

adequately funded, and vigorously pursued program, at least five to seven<br />

>'ears would be required to accomplish the major objectives briefly discussed<br />

above.<br />

The reader should remember --hat during the past four years of the AFFMSDE<br />

Program, there have been a ncber of "gluts" in petroleum supply. At this<br />

tlme, another such "glut" is coming to an end. However, in the present cir-<br />

cumstances, there are indications that the price of petroleum <strong>fuels</strong> may not<br />

rise significantly <strong>for</strong> some ~ime in ~-he future because of internal discord<br />

10


wit/nan the OPEC producing nations. On the other hand, the inherent instabil-<br />

ity of the ~ddle East has never been more apparent than it is today.<br />

Past support of the AFFMSDE Program has been maintained by a cooperative<br />

funding approach involving DOE, DOT/FRA, and the AAR. Support of the program<br />

is now being assumed by the AAR. It is obvious that future support will de-<br />

pend heavily on the endorsement and participation of the operating rail com-<br />

panies comprising the AAR. It is suggested that success of the overall pro-<br />

~ect depends and requires continuous participation and support by the rail<br />

operating companies regardless of the vagaries and vacillating happenings of<br />

the World energy market.<br />

The major management problem that is implicit in this multi-year, essen-<br />

tially vo!u;~tarily supported program is the maintenance of this voluntary sup-<br />

port <strong>for</strong> what is an ambitious, technically difficult, and a large-scale pro-<br />

gram. It is sarongly suggested that the development and <strong>for</strong>mal adoption, by<br />

all participants, of a multi-year Program Management Plan might provide a<br />

means of fozusing attention to this difficult management aspect and thus a<br />

means of contributing to developing a con~nitment to support of the program<br />

<strong>for</strong> its full duration by the AAR's member lines.<br />

4.!.3 Planned In<strong>for</strong>mation Dissemination<br />

To date, the overal) objective of the activities per<strong>for</strong>med under the<br />

AFFMSDE Program have been concel'ned with reduction of the levels of uncertainty<br />

associated with the use of <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> in rail motive power systems.<br />

I~ is suggested that these objectives should be expanded to include additional<br />

technological aspects of energy use in motive power units generally. It is<br />

suggested ~hat there are five categories or dimensions of uncertainty:<br />

1. Technological uncertainty<br />

2. Cost uncertainty<br />

3. Demand uncertainty<br />

4. Institutional uncertainty comprised of internal and external institutional<br />

uncertainty<br />

5. Uncertainty about externalities outside the institutional system.<br />

ll


To date, the AFFMSDE Progr~T, has been concerned almost exclusively with<br />

the single consideration of eliminating technological uncertainty associated<br />

with the use of <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong>. Even in this area of program concentra-<br />

5ion, the program has progressed only in ",he "research" phase. Identifying<br />

the problems and the solutions to the problems of operating with these fuel<br />

systems requlres the development of reliable, 1ong-!ived and maintainable<br />

engine systems operating on selected <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> and the demonstration<br />

cf the use of these <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> in operating rail environments.<br />

Whatever the results of r_he program activities, they must be accompanied<br />

by nhe effective dissemination of in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding all program findings<br />

in these areas of uncertainty and the extent to which this uncertainty has<br />

been reduced.<br />

It is recommended that in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemination be identified as a spe-<br />

cific task or activity area. An effective in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemination program<br />

should be designed and specific responsibility <strong>for</strong> its continuous execution<br />

provided <strong>for</strong> in all program-related activities.<br />

4. i. 4 Additional Program. Component5 Suggested<br />

At the present time, there is no <strong>for</strong>mally documented, multi-year program<br />

plan developed by, and agreeable to, the participants in the AFFMSDE Program.<br />

Present activities are almost exclusively research oriented. These activiti~-s<br />

<strong>for</strong>m the basis from which any multi-year program plan must evolve.<br />

These research activities should evolve through development to opera-<br />

tional demonstration if a multi-year program management approach is to be<br />

used in the AFFMSDE Program. These activities--research, development, and<br />

operational demonstration of <strong>alternative</strong> fuel systems--<strong>for</strong>m the "core" of a<br />

logical program plan.<br />

However, ~wo additional program components are suggested. First, the<br />

addition of a "Supporting Tasks" component addressing the many peripheral as-<br />

[,ec~s of the use of <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong>, fuel conserving technology, energy<br />

recovery technology, system~ analysis, and systems economics studies, etc.<br />

The second new prognam component suggested is a planned in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemin-<br />

ation activity as has been discussed.<br />

12


These three major program components should be restricted to consideration<br />

of powerplan~s in rail motive power units and the servicing and s~ppor~ equip-<br />

men~ and persor.nel systems directly related to motive power unit operation.<br />

Problems related to the operational -use of these equipment systems in<br />

rail operating environment, and the general problem of energy use and energy<br />

conservation in rail operations, should not be within the purview of this pro-<br />

gram but should fall within the purview of the Energy Steering Committee of<br />

the AAR.<br />

4.2 Supporting Tasks Component<br />

It is suggested that some means be developed to carry out individual<br />

supporting tasks, on a scheduled and direct basis, into such subject areas as:<br />

• Alternative <strong>fuels</strong> availability<br />

• Safety in fuel handling, storaqe, and distribution in rail operations<br />

• Alternative <strong>engines</strong> and combinations of <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>engines</strong> and<br />

<strong>alternative</strong> fuel systems<br />

• Energy ~onservation opportunities in motive power unit powerplants<br />

• Energy recovery technology in motive power unit powerplants<br />

• Systems economics considerations including the impact of the use of<br />

aulernative <strong>fuels</strong> and other technological developments on fuel pro-<br />

ducers, rail equipment manufacturers, ~--.~ operating companies.<br />

Factors considered should include, among or_her considerations, the<br />

• mpac~ on present equity values, the total real costs of conversion,<br />

the impact on costs of operetion, and rail customer rate impacts.<br />

4.3 Planned ~n<strong>for</strong>mation Dissemination Components<br />

. , , , ,<br />

A planned ef<strong>for</strong>t should be undertaken to identify the specific in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

needs of rail operating companies <strong>for</strong> the in<strong>for</strong>mation products, in whatever<br />

<strong>for</strong>m, tc be produced by ~he AFFMSDE Program. A system <strong>for</strong> presenting this<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation in the most effective manner, i.e., written documentation, work-<br />

shops, seminars, extensive reports, physical demonstrations, etc., should be<br />

developed i~eratively with the identification of the specific recipients iden-<br />

tified within the AAR organizational structure &nd operating companies. This<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation should be brought together into a documented in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemin-<br />

ation program compatible with the research, development, and operational dem-<br />

13


onstration program plan. Responsibility <strong>for</strong> its execution should be assigned<br />

to 3pccific individuals with the appropriate skills and adequate funding s~p-<br />

[mrt, within the overall program budget, provided.<br />

4.4 The Multi-Year Reseaxch, Development, ~nd Operational Demonstration Pro-<br />

gram Project<br />

4.4.1 Basic Logic of Activity Areas<br />

There are three basically different, but interrelated, types of selection<br />

decisions tha~ must be made to establish the approach to be used in this pro-<br />

gram. The manner in which these decisions are made will determine the effec-<br />

~_iveness with which the limited resources available are used to meet the spe-<br />

cific objectivRs of this program. These selection dec~_sions are:<br />

i. The selec~_-~n of the <strong>fuels</strong> to be subject to test<br />

2. Selectior of the method of use of the fuel in <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong><br />

3. The excerpt to which investigation of the <strong>fuels</strong> is carried in terms of<br />

2-cylinder testing, multi-cylinder testing: and final development and<br />

operational demonstration in rail motive power equipment.<br />

The nature of the selection problem becomes apparent if r_he reader will<br />

inspect Figures 4 through 6.<br />

Figure 4 is a representative, but far from complete, identification of<br />

examples of six different classes of <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong>.<br />

Figure 5, which represents the areas of investigation that have evolved<br />

to dace in the AFFMSDE Program, contains four methods of use of <strong>alternative</strong><br />

<strong>fuels</strong> in <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong>. These are petroleum-based <strong>fuels</strong> with properties<br />

s'-gnifican-_ly different from Diesel NO. 2 (Area C) and blends and emulsions<br />

iArea B). Limiting properties petrolett~-based <strong>fuels</strong> and "stabilized" or "pre-<br />

pared" emulsions could he operated in essentially unmodified <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong><br />

<strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong>. If the blends and emulsions are prepared "on-line", modifi-<br />

cations of some significance are required to r/he motive power equipment. Dual<br />

~eling and S~aged Injection (Areas D and E) represent significant departures<br />

in design from conventional injection systems. Further, any ~wo-fuel combin-<br />

ation syszems, which includes blends and emulsions, dual-fueling and staged<br />

injection systems, would require dual fuel storage systems onboard rail motive<br />

~cwer equipment.<br />

14


Examples:<br />

1. Limiting Properties Fuels from Petroleum No. 3 Specification<br />

. Fuels from Non-Petroleum, Fossil Feedstocks<br />

Coal Derived<br />

Oil-Shale Derived<br />

Tar Sands Derived<br />

Heavy Oils<br />

SRC il<br />

Methanol<br />

3. Biomass Derived Ethanol<br />

4. Vegetable Oils Castor<br />

Corn<br />

Cottonseed<br />

Peanut<br />

Soybean<br />

Sunflower<br />

5. Animal Oils & Fats<br />

6. Gaseous Fuels Methane<br />

Ammoni~<br />

Propane<br />

Hydrogen<br />

PARAHO Process DFM<br />

Fig. 4 Examples of Classes of Alternative Fuels and Some Examples of Such Fuels<br />

15


Fig. 5<br />

Wear Measurements<br />

Sunflower Oil<br />

Other Limited Scope Investigations<br />

Blends and Emulsions<br />

Limiting Properties<br />

Dual Fueling<br />

Staged Injection<br />

16<br />

Area A<br />

Area B<br />

Area C<br />

Area D<br />

Area E<br />

Presently Proposed Areas of Investigation Comprising the<br />

All;ernative Fuels <strong>for</strong> Nedium Speed Diesel Engines (AFFMSDE)<br />

Project Activities.


Figure 6 illustrates a sequence of 4 steps, the logic of which is obvious,<br />

which at6 progressive steps from research testing nhrough operational demon-<br />

stration in revenue service. The investigation of any <strong>alternative</strong> fuel can-<br />

dldates can be carried to any of the four levels of investigation noted on<br />

this Figure.<br />

It is also obvious that in the presence of limited resources, including the<br />

resource of tlme, the judicious selection of the <strong>fuels</strong> to be tested, their<br />

method of use, and the level of system testing to which the investigation will<br />

be carried is of critical significance in attaining the most effective use of<br />

program resources.<br />

4.4.2 Basic Logic of RaD in Stationary Engines<br />

All participants who have been involved in the AFF~DE Program to date<br />

agree that research into combustion per<strong>for</strong>mance, fuel delivery systems, engine<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance, and emissions characteristics that are of a research nature<br />

should be carried out in stationary research engine systems. In order to<br />

minimlze expenses as well as time re~iirements, research-oriented ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

should be carried out in the 2-cylinder engine research system and the con-<br />

clusions reached in this normally aspirated engine system verified by limited<br />

running in multi-cylinder, supercharged <strong>engines</strong>.<br />

Research equipment systems do not require construction in a manner that<br />

wall assure long-term, reliable operation, if an <strong>alternative</strong> fuel system is<br />

to be investigated as a serious candidate <strong>for</strong> eventual use in operational<br />

demonstration testing, the development of injection systems and support sys-<br />

tems <strong>for</strong> engine operation on selected <strong>alternative</strong> fuel candidates should also<br />

be carried out in stationary engine systems to minimize expense.<br />

4.4.3 Basic Logic of Operational Demonstration<br />

Once the per<strong>for</strong>mance, reliability, and maintainability of a specific<br />

injection system and supporting systems has been demonstrated in stationary<br />

multi-cylinder operation, installation in rail motive power equipment should<br />

then logically be Lmdertaken. The objectives of this type of testing should<br />

be to verify that the per<strong>for</strong>mance, reliability, and maintainability character-<br />

istics demonstrated in stationary engine testing are preserved in the high-<br />

vibration levels, temperature extremes, etc., environments of rail operating<br />

17


, ....., ,, ,<br />

LEVEL 1<br />

Two Cylinder<br />

Engine Research<br />

LEVEL 2<br />

12 Cylinder Engine<br />

Research and Development<br />

LEVEL 3<br />

l<br />

Rail Motive Power Unit<br />

Development and Demonstration<br />

5 or More Years<br />

Fig. 6 Progressive Levels of Testin9 of Alternative Fuel Systems in<br />

2-Cylinder Szationary, Multi-Cylinder Stationary and Rail<br />

Operating Environments.<br />

18<br />

LEVEL 4<br />

Opportunity <strong>for</strong> Use<br />

in Revenue Service


equipment. The number of measurements required to be made in this environ-<br />

ment should be significantly reduced from those associated with stationary<br />

multi-cylinder testiDg.<br />

4.4.4 work Areas<br />

It is proEosed that t_he AFFMSDE Program Plan presented here would consist<br />

of three program components:<br />

1. Supporting tasks<br />

2. In<strong>for</strong>mation dissemination<br />

3. The multi-year research, development, and operational demonstration<br />

progra/n plan.<br />

5 The Program Plan Proposed<br />

4.5.1 A Concept <strong>for</strong> Review and Revisien<br />

The program planning proposal contained on the following pages is inten-<br />

ded to provide only a "baseline" concept. In any program of the duration,<br />

complexity, and cost such as is suggested by this program plan, review and<br />

revision should be a managed and scheduled process. This planning proposal<br />

and this complete document is provided to support two suggested actions.<br />

First, the adoption of multi-year, long-range planning as the method of man-<br />

agement of the AFFMSDE Program. Secondly, a document upon which the review<br />

and revision process can be begun.<br />

4.5.2 RD&D Activity Areas<br />

Figure 7 presents a Gantt cha~t of the proposed multi-year program. This<br />

chart is part of the PERT/CPM planning package--parts of which will be discussed<br />

in following pages. The activities column requires discussion in relation<br />

to its PERT/CPM origin.<br />

Activities 1 through 7 are "dummy" events used to identify the five<br />

"arees" of investigation illustrated in Figure 5.<br />

Activity #I provides an identification of program start only. Activities<br />

#2 and #3 identify two areas of investigation underway at the present time at<br />

SwRI. Activities #4 through #7 identify four basic groups of fuel delivery<br />

systems investigations as previously discussed and illustrated in Figure 5,<br />

19


o<br />

#<br />

t #<br />

* .3.<br />

m<br />

I<br />

#<br />

WW<br />

#<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

!<br />

I<br />

I<br />

#<br />

I<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

ACIIVITY<br />

| I AFFH.~UR PIIASE I r ,~TART<br />

| ? WEAR MEA.~URFHENTS/LAB END<br />

3 SUNTI.OWER/DF-2 IN 12 CYI,<br />

E 4 I,OCO FUEl, sYsr/RI,END&EM'IIL<br />

| 5 SPE(:hTEST LIHITIHP. PROP<br />

g 6 DUAL FUEL/EHD&GE/12 CYLIH<br />

8 WEAR<br />

I1 DE'fAIL DESIGN/LOCO SYSTEM<br />

12 ASSEMBLE & TEST/12 CYLIND<br />

13 CONST SYST FOR FIELD TIT.ST<br />

15 AVAIIABILITY STUDIES<br />

16 TEST ON IAB ENGI, HES<br />

17 COb'ST SYST FOR FIELD TEST<br />

oP ILS<br />

19 DUHHY<br />

20 DETAIL DESIGN FOR EHD<br />

21 FAB I~D PROTOTYPE COHFIC<br />

22 I~HD PROTOTYPE TO 2:567<br />

23 U'iD PROTOTYPE TO 12 CYLIH<br />

25 COHCEPTUAL DESICN/GE<br />

26 DE'rALL DESIGN/GE<br />

27 "LR (.'E PROTOTYPE COHFIG<br />

78 .,,F I'RDTOTYPE-2 IN )2 CYI,<br />

29 12 CYhlNDER GE DUAL FUEL<br />

~ i p ~ ~ Lq<br />

32 PROTOTYPE & REHCII TEST<br />

33 FAR II STACED INJ PROTO<br />

34 BEHCII TF, ST I I PROTOTYPES<br />

# 41 DUH~Y<br />

I 42 DU~<br />

I 43 DUI~<br />

I 44 DU~<br />

¢ 45 DUPB4Y<br />

I 46 COMPLETE AFn(SDE PROJECT<br />

BOlD<br />

Aroa<br />

D-1<br />

E-1<br />

E-2<br />

• Operation of Motive Power Unite I= not Prked m scheduled In detail<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

E<br />

AF F'H,~ I)F,<br />

0 ........ 62 104 168<br />

WEEKS ELAPSED<br />

Fig. 7 Proposed Multi-Year Program P|anning Concept <strong>for</strong> the AFFMSDE Program.<br />

208<br />

247


Actual program activities begin with Activity #8. Activities #40 ~,~_rough #46<br />

are also dummy events used to close out ~e PERT/CPM presentation and the<br />

calculation systems involved in its preparation. Actual program acti¢ities<br />

are comprised of Activities #8 through #39.<br />

Within each RD&D area, the individu'.! act':.vi~ies provide <strong>for</strong> the progres-<br />

sive evolution of the investigation of the four basic groups of fuel delivery<br />

systems described in Figure 5 through the four "levels" of investigation<br />

described in Figure 6, i.e., from 2-cylinder testing through multi-cylinder<br />

testing through 2 levels of rail operational demonstration.<br />

~_rea A Activities<br />

The Area A activities, wear measurements and the investigation of sun-<br />

flower oil in No. 2 Diesel fuel in 12-cylinder <strong>engines</strong> is presently underway<br />

at SwRI.<br />

Area B Activities<br />

Activities #i0 through #14 are sequentially per<strong>for</strong>med to support demon-<br />

stration operation on selected blends and emulsions in rail motive power units.<br />

If the blends and emulsions are "prepared", motive power unit modifications<br />

will be minimal. If on-line methods of preparation of blends and emulsions<br />

are selected <strong>for</strong> investigation, major modifications to the motive power unit<br />

might be required. The consideration of a requirement <strong>for</strong> the modification<br />

of a conventional motive power unit to serve as an <strong>alternative</strong> fuel research<br />

motive power unit will be discussed separately. ':<br />

Area C Activities<br />

Activities #15 through #18 lead sequentially to operational demonstration<br />

of <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> with properties significantly deviating from Diesel No. 2.<br />

Extensive Preparatory work related to this option has already been accomplished<br />

in the 2-cylinder and multi-cylinder research investigations at SwR7. Only<br />

minlmal modifications uo motive power equipment would be required to carry out<br />

this demcnstration.<br />

21


Areas D-I and D-2 Activities<br />

Ex~ensive investigations have been carried out in the use of dual-fueling<br />

approaches in methanol, cthanol, and SRC-II fuel systems. The development of<br />

equipment systems, their evaluation in stationary engine systems, and their<br />

eventual evaluation in the rail operations .Ayes significant mechanical<br />

design modifications to both the <strong>engines</strong> ana motive power units. The extent<br />

of this difference requires separating %he equipment manufactured by EMD and<br />

GE into two separate areas of investigation. This is provided <strong>for</strong> in Activi-<br />

ties ~20 through #24 <strong>for</strong> the ~ dual-fueling investigations and #25 through<br />

#30 <strong>for</strong> the GE dual-fueling investigations.<br />

Area E Activmties<br />

Two-cylinder combustion investigatlons carried ou~ by SwRI in earlier<br />

phases of the program demonstrated that the early injection, up to I15°BTDC,<br />

followed by injection of the main <strong>alternative</strong> fuel charge could provide sig-<br />

nificant improvement in the combustion of <strong>fuels</strong> tha~ were otherwise difficult<br />

to burn efficiently and with acceptable pressure-rise rates. However, <strong>for</strong><br />

other pfogram considerations in 2-cylinder testing activities, these investi-<br />

gations were terminated in a relatively early stage. "Staged-injection" is<br />

a method of injection of significant interest.<br />

system.<br />

Ac'civlties #32 through #35 will provide prototypes of a staged-injection<br />

It will then be necessary to take the 2-cylinder design prototype and,<br />

with appropriate modifications, evaluate and develop these systems in station-<br />

ary 12-cylinder <strong>engines</strong> of both EMD and GE designs. At the completion of<br />

these ef<strong>for</strong>ts, these systems will be available <strong>for</strong> operational evaluation in<br />

rail motive power units if it is so desired. Activities #36 and #37 provide<br />

these two final steps <strong>for</strong> one manufacturer's des'~gn and Activities #35 and<br />

#39 provide <strong>for</strong> the second manufacturer's design, i.e., F34D and GE.<br />

4.5.3 An Alternative Fuels Research Motive Power Unit Concept<br />

~qhile rail motive Dower '~nitdemonstration of limiting-property petroleum.-<br />

based <strong>fuels</strong> and "prepared" blends and emulsions may be c~rried out with exist-<br />

ing motive power equipment with minimum modifications, many of the fuel and<br />

de!i':ez~y systemics will recf~ire significant modifica-~ions <strong>for</strong> their demonstra-<br />

22


tion in a rail operating environment. A first option <strong>for</strong> significantly dif-<br />

ferent fuel <strong>for</strong>ms and dual-fuel systems to be investigated is to use equil)-<br />

ment with fuel storage in trailing equipment.<br />

A second option is to construct research motive power units by modifying<br />

existing equipment expressly <strong>for</strong> the requirements of the AFFMSDE Program. One<br />

concept of such a modification is illustrated in Figure 8. It should be noted<br />

that the tank installation shown can be constructed in such a way as to pro-<br />

~ide storage capability <strong>for</strong> a wide range of <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> including lique-<br />

fied gaseous <strong>fuels</strong>, blends, slurries, emulsions, etc.<br />

4.5.4 PERT/CPM Chart<br />

It is hoped that the preceding discussions can serve as an introduction<br />

to the more complex PERT/CPM presentation on the following page. This presen-<br />

tation contains the same logic of program activity flow depicted in the Gantt<br />

chart in Figure 7. It additionally shows the interrelationship of work flow<br />

between the activities in .each RD&D area previously discussed. Those activi-<br />

ties where the design concept of an alt~--rnative fuel research motive power<br />

unit may find use are illustrated using reproductions of the same unit shown<br />

in Figure 8.<br />

23


Design Concept<br />

o<br />

Fig. 8 Modified SD45-2 Alternative Fuels Research Motive Power Unit<br />

3~


p-<br />

7<br />

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS -ALTERNATIVE FUELS FOR ME]<br />

o~-:az~ ozs~c~Loco STSCZ~<br />

CO~S~ s~S: tax TZ¢~ ~ TI[ST<br />

I~ ~ T s~s~ ~I r~2~O TEST<br />

/XH r.+ v.o.-'c~.~P+ ¢+~T[;<br />

ii ..................<br />

J5 ~-5h7 ~O~OT~FE~ AC~=~G<br />

16 i% 5YSTZ~ ~a CT~tN sO~$<br />

4~ :+mm+<br />

,t~ I<br />

• =~ ~mprr ~.OoO ' o.ooo<br />

:> !,, ~ =.o:o o.ooo<br />

rT" 44 ,~,lq.~ ~.oo0 0,0~0<br />

LU 45 tUm'Y 0.000 0.0~0<br />

52<br />

• to o ~ n I~ o __<br />

;~ 22 ~: 22 0<br />

~ 22 3o 22 3~ 0<br />

";3 0 20 0 I,~ 0<br />

• 3 ~2 35 2Z ~5 0<br />

, 3~ R't :I', , ~,~, ,,o<br />

0; o ~+ o .-.2 o<br />

q) ~1'~ 74 &l 74 o<br />

a 22 0 2~ O<br />

22 ~t 22 ~: 0<br />

]~ 211 151 ,*tl *S2 a<br />

0 ;2 0 := 0<br />

22 3S 02 .1~ G<br />

~3 35 ~S; 35 4E c<br />

~4 ~n ~2 4U 82 0<br />

S2 ~ t34 82 134 0<br />

52 ~]¢ ~6 I)4 ~qr> 0<br />

225 13 23~ 13 23~ D<br />

34 2D4 2~R 2~I 2~<br />

Weeks Elaased trom Project $~art<br />

GO<br />

1.1.1<br />

I--<br />

0..<br />

0<br />

I.-<br />

c~<br />

ocS<br />

p..<br />

r'r*<br />

r.O<br />

t--<br />

:><br />

III<br />

..,J<br />

:)<br />

Q<br />

I.IJ<br />

-r"<br />

APT~SD~<br />

20~ ,:,~8<br />

AAR/SWF


|AILROADS -ALTERNATIVE FUELS FOR MEDIUM SPEED DIESEL ENGINES (AFFMS[;<br />

156<br />

C] f¢om ProJe~f ¢;fart<br />

O3<br />

IJ, J<br />

I--<br />


MSDE) PROGRAM PLAN PROPOSAL<br />

Wear Measurements A~2<br />

Sunflower/DF-2 A ~ ~<br />

Blends & Emulsions<br />

Limiting Properties<br />

A # 4 ~<br />

Dual Fueling,,, A,~6 -- (~ ,, A#19 ~<br />

Staged, Injection A+7__~ ~ .,,. A-~3".<br />

APPROXIMATE ELAPSED TIME<br />

A'#8 2-567<br />

Dz,* ~ "%*x- 3~ .-~ 0<br />

S$ = 0 $C- ]~<br />

7FDL A~9 645<br />

ZJcS- 0 ~C- +)<br />

A~10<br />

ML-- 1 T~:. 0 I~.- ".)<br />

S$'=0 ~= =,.1<br />

A~15<br />

A~20<br />

• :C ceP, Az; :P-'~ :-~ D,~<br />

D~- ~ OU.- ".2 q~. c<br />

pr~ S=rD;<br />

A#~25<br />

. .<br />

7FDL


APPROXIMATE ELAPSE~.. TIME 15 Weeks 25 Weeks<br />

A~-8 2 -567<br />

7FDL A~,~ 645<br />

A~lO A~11<br />

A~-15<br />

A~20<br />

A'~25<br />

f,~32 -®<br />

~u: "-z<br />

st.- *; so-<br />

7FDL A--16 645 ~@<br />

A,P17<br />

-®<br />

-®<br />

A'~33<br />

7FDL A~12 645<br />

ss,- :; so- }~<br />

A~21<br />

~- ==== ~., 4~<br />

A~'26<br />

m<br />

-: =:~-=%o<br />

svl:<br />

~13 J'- s'.rl:<br />

v k<br />

v<br />

f~


J<br />

.5 Weeks<br />

645<br />

~-. j~<br />

r~ ~*<br />

A#18<br />

• "+ Ltm1"r=~¢ Pit ,'+-o<br />

35 Weeks<br />

Z 5s- ~5 mo- I~<br />

A#34<br />

a ~+4 Iil0+~ ."I~T l'f ~<br />

\<br />

A~P13<br />

45 Weeks 55 Weeks<br />

~ ~11 " ~00<br />

GE 7FDL & EMD 645 TEST OPPORTUNITY<br />

A+~4 Blends & Emulsions Evaluation Opp<br />

Limiting Properties Evaluation Opportunity GE & EMD<br />

~.~ A#~35 2-567<br />

Sg" ca 5C- ~2<br />

Z END OF PROPOSED GY 1982 PROGRAM<br />

(~ A+22 2-567 _~<br />

Db- "- .~J~- 13 ,--~" 0<br />

It~;~- +¢,r R Z<br />

L© A~27<br />

S-~ ++ :;c. ;:.<br />

ILL,, • tVl~ I-- p,~-I 0<br />

--'_. " mr-- -" ~I


45 Weeks 55 Weeks 85 Weeks 100 Weeks<br />

GE 7FDL & EMD 645 TEST OPFORTUNITY<br />

.-<br />

A,.- 14 Blends & Emulsions Evaluation Opportunity<br />

;ert!es Evaluation Opportunity GE & EMD<br />

. ~ A~35<br />

' ":- " :!z<br />

A END OF PROPOSED CY 1982 PROGRAM<br />

. A#22 2-567 .~~ A'~23 645.~~ A"~'24<br />

A~.27<br />

:.LS..- :.~. ,co<br />

2-567 _=@ A~36<br />

mEs~ s~.=!<br />

.-~ =~ ,,=~,~ ~ ..,~=<br />

c~ ¢,m - - , -<br />

ss- so- ..<br />

EMD Dual Fu<br />

=@ A'#'28<br />

n* ~U


- J<br />

100 ~.-exs 135Weeks 160 Weeks<br />

EMD Du~l Fueling Evaluation Opportunity<br />

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+ ~.<<br />

,~"28 7FDL ~ )<br />

A#29 TFDL ,,,, ~ (~<br />

.'.I,,. • [r"+t~ ~I~ ~ 0<br />

• 37 m*. SYsTI~ ~ ;u*zl~<br />

m,- ]<br />

i~t-~ p- suP*X<br />

A~30 GE Dual Fueling Evaluatio:<br />

A#aT Staged Injection System #~! Evaluation, Or<br />

~S- 13~ r,¢. ".aN<br />

A-#38<br />

:,~.~. -J4 :.xc- :.~<br />

Staged Injec'


"i<br />

&<br />

"" Fueling Evaluation Oppo~unity<br />

~:-~ 1 Evaluation Opportunity<br />

Staged Injection System ~2<br />

A÷39<br />

A~*40<br />

A,~41<br />

A~42<br />

A~44<br />

A~45<br />

$.3~ :}e E" Z38<br />

240 Weeks<br />

Evaluation Opportunity<br />

c4,,- 0 :,a~,- 0<br />

~1.WJCosler 12-81


Section 5<br />

PROGRAM BENEFITS<br />

The limits of the properties of petroleum-based fuel that will provide<br />

satisfactory operation of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>engines</strong> will be determined.<br />

The characteristics of operation of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> on fuel<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms representative of syn<strong>fuels</strong> derived from non-petroleum, fossil-<br />

based resources will be determined.<br />

The characteristics of operation of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> on fuel<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms derived from non-fossil resources will be determined.<br />

A 2-cylinder and multi-cylinder rail motive power laboratory has been<br />

established at SwRl. The facility is supported by personnel e~erienced<br />

in <strong>fuels</strong> research, lubricants technology, emissions measurements, and<br />

combustion research in <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> and support systems.<br />

The ~otential benefits that can be derived from the application of advanced<br />

technology to <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> <strong>engines</strong> and the potential benefits and<br />

problems associated with the use of <strong>alternative</strong> engine designs, energy<br />

conservation systems, and energy recovery systems will be inves%igated<br />

and documented.<br />

The strategies or implementation options that can be used to mak~ transi-<br />

tion off petroleum-based fuel <strong>for</strong>ms to non-petroleum based fuel "~[.nrms<br />

wall be investigated, and documented, from the business oper~io:-;~ stand-<br />

point of organizations making use of <strong>medium</strong>-<strong>speed</strong> <strong>diesel</strong> en~!~


Section 6<br />

MANAGEMENT APPROACH<br />

The method of approach %o the management of the AFFMSDE Program has been<br />

established through four years of activity cn that program.. However, there<br />

are two recent changes that may impact this method of management.<br />

First, ef<strong>for</strong>ts are presently underway by SwRI under AAR direction to<br />

broaden the representation on the Alternatave Fuels Steering Co~nittee of the<br />

AAR to include representation from the <strong>fuels</strong> industry.<br />

Sccondl}', the AAR is understood to be <strong>for</strong>ming an overall energy Steering<br />

Committee whzch will consider the broad aspects o~ energy use in the rail<br />

industry. The problem of <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong>, energy conservation, and energy<br />

recovery ~echnology in rail motive power equipment is only one aspect of this<br />

over~ll program.<br />

These considerations, combined with ~e ~chree suggested activity areas<br />

previousl3' discussed in this program planning concept document, suggest a pro-<br />

Jec~ management structure as illustrated in Figure 10.<br />

27


F<br />

Alle~ntllvs Fuels Steering Committee<br />

WIIP- rlli~olortllllOJt of:<br />

~pefilk" 2 Llrml<br />

I~ ~l~lerll MllrlUfll CIilXI~ 3<br />

Fuel8 b1~k.~l ¢ 7<br />

l~l~iti~llrll DI ENlroy<br />

FRA/DOT<br />

AAR Enn0rgy 8luring CommJtleo<br />

I<br />

I Remosrch.<br />

& Demonll<br />

,, 1<br />

!<br />

I<br />

AFFU~;DE PtolFm Msnmger<br />

Dspll:lmsnt el Engine end Vehicle Research<br />

Southwest Reassrch InstJlutc<br />

! .,,t<br />

• I<br />

Dove,,opmalnt I I Prolalct C=nm~unlcatlonl •<br />

,Irallott TIIII, I I¢llOCmllll~rl Olllemi'Ls~k)rl Telko<br />

I ~,o..~,T..,. I<br />

Fig. I0 AFFMSDE Management Structure Suggested by Recent and<br />

Proposed SwRI and AAR Initiatives.<br />

28


7.1 Basic Project Budget<br />

Section 7<br />

BUDGETARY ESTIMATES<br />

Figure ll presentS a basic budgetary estimate <strong>for</strong> each of the activity<br />

areas in terms of total dollars and total manhours requ_red <strong>for</strong> their comple-<br />

tion. This budget does not include funds <strong>for</strong> the design, construction, or<br />

operation of motive power units used in operational demonstrations.<br />

7.2 Cash Flow Requirements<br />

Figure 12 presents the program cash flow requirements over a nominal 5-<br />

year program with major milestones indicated. These cash flow estimates do<br />

not provide <strong>for</strong> the design, construction, or operation of motive power equip-<br />

ment in operational rail demonstrations.<br />

29


# 1<br />

# 2<br />

#3<br />

#4<br />

5<br />

#6<br />

7<br />

t 3<br />

# i 9<br />

# i0<br />

eiI<br />

12<br />

# 13<br />

# I~,<br />

# 15<br />

16<br />

# 17<br />

# ll8<br />

AcTIVI'~<br />

AFFHSDE PHASE 1:1" START<br />

WEAR HZAS~NTS/I,A~ E~G<br />

SONFLON~RII]F-2 IN 12 CTL<br />

LOCO FITET.. SYST/BLENDSEMUL<br />

SFEC&TEST LIMITING PROP<br />

DUAL FUEL/Eb~)fGE/12 CY'L~N<br />

S'rAG%~ ~J~CTION/EMD & GE<br />

WEAR ~-._.AS UP.EMENTS/2-567<br />

CO,CECAL DZ-SZGN STUDIrS<br />

DETAZL 9ESIGN/LOCO ~Z~<br />

ASSEMBLE & TEST/12 CYL]21D<br />

cossT ~sT ~e: ~r_..ELD "~ST<br />

S~OS/E~a~S¢O~.S ...¢0 ~'~S<br />

DOLIJLR AND HANHOUR LEVELS BY T.ASK<br />

RD&D<br />

Area<br />

AVA/.LA3ILITY SI~DIES C<br />

TEST ON LAB ~NG~ES<br />

CONST SYST FOR FIELD OF.ST<br />

2O DETAIL DESIGN I~OR D~D<br />

# 21 ~A~ E~J) PROTOTYPE COWFIG<br />

22 EMD PROTOTYPE TO 2=567<br />

# ~--3 ~[D PROTOTYPE TO 12 CTLZN<br />

u z5 C0NCE~TOAI. D~s'rGH'/G'E<br />

# 26 DErA/L DESIGN/GE<br />

# 27 F/,3 GE PR(~O'I"~E COb'PIO<br />

# 28 ~ RP,0TOT'L'~E-2 ]2; 12 Cr/.,<br />

# 29 12 CTLZND~ G~ DUAL<br />

# 30 cE ~O~Ta ~O~'CZ~IG To~z~<br />

# 31 D ~<br />

3 32 FROTOTTPE & BENCK TEST<br />

# 33 FA3 #1 STAGED ~NJ PROTO<br />

# 34 BZNCl~ TEST #i PROTOTYPES<br />

# 35 2-5~7 PROTOTTPES RUNNYNG<br />

I<br />

# 37 #I sYs~m~ To ~-'~s .il<br />

# 3B #2 5YST~ 12 CYLLN'DER ~;<br />

~OOU~<br />

~ 41 DOH~<br />

# 43 DOI, LHY<br />

# 4~ D0"Y'2@/<br />

# 45 IX21RY<br />

# 46 C0,~RDY.,E~ AFb'I~D~ FROJ'ECT<br />

TOTAL DOLLARS $5,722,000.00<br />

TOTAL .~NIIOURS 72,151<br />

A<br />

B<br />

TOTAL ~OLLARS<br />

$0,00<br />

$0.00<br />

S0.00<br />

S0.00<br />

$0,00<br />

S0.00<br />

S0.00<br />

$98,999.90<br />

,l ~S4,,000-~O<br />

$28,735.90<br />

$48,939.00<br />

576,575.00<br />

$54,697.00<br />

qo.oo<br />

525,000.00<br />

S51,692.00<br />

$4,30G.00<br />

~o.oo<br />

S0.O0<br />

0105,000.00<br />

$50,000.00<br />

SI00,000.00<br />

$339,999.00<br />

~o.oo<br />

$49,375.00<br />

$108,625,00<br />

$50,000.00<br />

$350,000.00<br />

$450,002.00<br />

S0.00<br />

E S0.00<br />

S46,097.10<br />

$27,658.00<br />

$52,242.00<br />

$749,99g.00<br />

~1,~6o,ooo.b~<br />

, ~o,.,po<br />

$1,400,000.00<br />

So-oo<br />

$0.00<br />

$0.00<br />

$0.00<br />

$0.00<br />

$0.00<br />

SO.O0<br />

SO.O0<br />

Operation of Mothte Power Units is not scheduled or prk=ed ~ detaU<br />

'IOTA/, H,~"8OURS<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2,322<br />

g47<br />

i, 892<br />

3,216<br />

5,032<br />

3,595<br />

0<br />

5OO<br />

1,238<br />

103<br />

..~<br />

0<br />

2,200<br />

1,000<br />

2,100<br />

5,600<br />

0<br />

1,892<br />

4,162<br />

1,000<br />

2,100<br />

6,000<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2,580<br />

1,548<br />

2,924<br />

4tO00<br />

8,000<br />

0<br />

' 8,000<br />

Q<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Fig. II Basic Budgetary Estimates of the Multi-Year AFFPLSDE Program<br />

30


w<br />

0<br />

80<br />

! 4o.<br />

i l |<br />

20 i l |<br />

L I I<br />

II<br />

m m w<br />

,,°<br />

.J"<br />

°,*<br />

°,,<br />

11<br />

o<br />

Q<br />

¢<br />

i<br />

J.<br />

a<br />

al<br />

°,<br />

QO i<br />

.'" .'"" ,'"'"' ....' .. "" 3rd Year ~,m~It10~ ~ Expenditure<br />

2nd Year Cumulative ExpendlLure<br />

$2 SHO,O00<br />

1st Year Cumulative Expenditure<br />

$834,000<br />

LLLLLLLtL!Lt!LLLL ........<br />

0 52<br />

104 1 66<br />

Time Elapsed, Weeks<br />

Fig. 12 Cash Flow Requir~ents Estin~tes of the Multi-Year AFFMSDE Program<br />

208<br />

!47


i.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

Section 8<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Planning, Management and Financial Support of the AFFMSDE Program<br />

should be carried out on a Multi-Year basis evolving from the present<br />

year-to-year approach.<br />

Study and analysis tasks covering a broad range of considerations<br />

supporting <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>fuels</strong> and engine technology tasks should be<br />

added to the scope of work of the AFF~DE program. These tasks<br />

sh¢,uld consider such subjects as <strong>fuels</strong> availability, safety in<br />

handling and use, the range of problems that would be encountered<br />

by rail operating companies if such <strong>fuels</strong> were to be used in motive<br />

power equipment in revenue service, the /x, pact on original equipment<br />

manufacturers, etc.<br />

The in<strong>for</strong>mation needs of the rail operating companies related to the<br />

AFFMSD~ Program should be studied and specific in<strong>for</strong>mation requirements,<br />

methods of commu~ication, etc. identified. These requirements should<br />

<strong>for</strong>m the basis of a planned in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemination program which<br />

should be incorporated into the AFFMSDE Multi-Year Program Plan.<br />

32


k :J<br />

|mm<br />

m<br />

el 0<br />

• .~,g 0<br />

q~ L_<br />

.~ |-- . 0<br />

m~----" k<br />

w,= :<br />

3 ® :~'P,<br />

8 ,_'- • .,S ~<br />

~_ ~ E .-...:<br />

ffl<br />

'-0 ~"<br />

e<br />

Reproduced by NT/S<br />

National Technical In<strong>for</strong>mation Service<br />

Springfield, VA 22161<br />

This report was printed specifically <strong>for</strong> your order<br />

from nearly 3 million titles available in our collection.<br />

For economy and efficiency, NTIS does not maintain stock of its<br />

vast collection of technical reports. Rather, most documents are<br />

custom reproduced <strong>for</strong> each order. Documents that are not in<br />

electronic <strong>for</strong>mat are reproduced from master archival copies<br />

and are the best possible reproductions available.<br />

Occasionally, older master materials may reproduce portions of<br />

documents that are not fully legible, if you have questions<br />

concerning this document or any order you have placed with<br />

NTIS, please call our Customer Service Department at (703)<br />

605-6050.<br />

About NTIS<br />

NTIS collects scientific, technical, engineering, and related<br />

business in<strong>for</strong>mation- then organizes, maintains, and<br />

disseminates that in<strong>for</strong>mation in a variety of <strong>for</strong>mats - including<br />

electronic download, online access, CD-ROM, magnetic tape,<br />

diskette, multimedia, microfiche and paper.<br />

The NTIS collection of nearly 3 million titles includes reports<br />

describing research conducted or sponsored by federal<br />

agencies and their contractors; statistical and business<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation; U.S. military publications; multimedia training<br />

products; computer software and electronic databases<br />

developed by federal agencies; and technical reports prepared<br />

by research organizations worldwide.<br />

For more in<strong>for</strong>mation about NTIS, visit our Web site at<br />

http://www.ntis.gov.<br />

N'r ,<br />

Ensuring Permanent, Easy Access to<br />

U.S. Government In<strong>for</strong>mation Assets


~r~s o~<br />

U.S. DEPARTMENT<br />

OF COMMERCE<br />

Technology Adminishotion<br />

National lechnicol In<strong>for</strong>mation Service<br />

Springfield, VA 22161 (703) 605-6000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!