03.05.2019 Views

PCC_MayJun_2019_e

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Continued from Page 20<br />

percentage of fruit in larger size classes<br />

than those produced by the nongrafted<br />

scion varieties. Averaged over<br />

all our trials, the differences in fruit<br />

size distribution between grafted and<br />

non-grafted were fairly small. In some<br />

trials, however, plants on vigorous<br />

rootstocks did have larger fruit. Some<br />

published studies provide measures of<br />

fruit quality, such as dissolved sugars,<br />

pH, total dissolved solids, vitamin C,<br />

lycopene, or even “taste-test” data.<br />

Those studies indicate that the quality<br />

of fruit from grafted plants seems to be<br />

slightly inferior to fruit from the nongrafted<br />

plants, though still commercially<br />

acceptable. Our field trials focused on<br />

yields, and we did not measure any<br />

fruit quality data. However, we did<br />

not notice any fruit defect problems in<br />

grafted vines. Also, in 2018 we did cut<br />

open both red and mature green fruit at<br />

harvest to make sure that there were no<br />

problems inside the fruit.<br />

Variability From Trial to Trial or<br />

Field to Field<br />

A study in Florida with determinant<br />

type cultivars has shown yield<br />

increases of 25 to 42 percent using<br />

certain rootstocks, but year-to-year<br />

variability also increased as compared<br />

to non-grafted plants. This variation<br />

underscores the importance of<br />

considering variable outcomes to<br />

determine the feasibility of grafted<br />

tomatoes here. Some fields will likely<br />

benefit more from grafting than others,<br />

and this may not always be predictable<br />

in advance.<br />

Economics<br />

Costs of field establishment are<br />

increased significantly with grafting.<br />

Material costs for transplanting (seed<br />

plus nursery costs) alone might be<br />

$2,000 per acre or higher or more<br />

than with conventional transplants.<br />

However, we don’t yet really know what<br />

the costs might be if this were adopted<br />

commercially in California, so our plant<br />

costs are based on small volume sales<br />

prices. If we assume a cost of $0.40 per<br />

grafted plant, then a yield increase of<br />

19 percent at a market price of $6.55<br />

per 25-pound box would pay for the<br />

increased plant cost.<br />

On-going and Future Work<br />

Scion Cultivars<br />

(Trial Years)<br />

‘Bobcat’ (2016) ‘DRO137TX’ (2016-18)<br />

‘Dixie Red’ (2016) ‘Maxifort’ (2016-18)<br />

*‘Galilea’ (2016) ‘Arnold’ (2018)<br />

‘HM 1794’ (2016-18) ‘Guardior’ (2018)<br />

‘Quali T 27’ (2017-18) ‘Estamino’ (2018)<br />

‘Quali T 47’ (2017-18)<br />

‘Quali T 99’ (2017-18)<br />

Other research projects looking<br />

at grafting tomatoes are being<br />

conducted in California. A United<br />

States Department of Agriculture<br />

(USDA)-funded project with<br />

processing tomatoes is underway with<br />

collaboration of Gene Miyao, UCCE<br />

Yolo, Solano and Sacramento counties,<br />

Zheng Wang, UCCE Stanislaus County<br />

and myself, in addition to proprietary<br />

research being conducted by the<br />

industry. Rootstocks for heirloom<br />

tomato production are being evaluated<br />

by Margaret Lloyd, small farms advisor<br />

with UCCE in Yolo, Solano and<br />

Sacramento counties.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The California Department of Pesticide<br />

Regulation provided partial funding<br />

for this project but does not necessarily<br />

agree with any opinions expressed, nor<br />

endorse any commercial product or<br />

trade name mentioned. In addition,<br />

this project was supported by the<br />

Specialty Crop Block Grant Program<br />

at the U.S. Department of Agriculture<br />

through Grant 14-SCBGP-CA-0006.<br />

The contents of this report are solely<br />

the responsibility of the authors and<br />

do not necessarily represent the official<br />

views of the USDA. We also thank<br />

our grower-cooperators (Live Oak<br />

Farms and Pacific Triple E), Growers<br />

Transplanting Inc. for producing grafted<br />

Rootstock Cultivars<br />

(Trial Years)<br />

Non-grafted Control<br />

Table 2. Scion and rootstock cultivars used in our field trials.<br />

*Note: Galilea is a roma/saladette type, while the other seven cultivars are all round types; all<br />

but Dixie Red were developed for the Western U.S. mature green production system.<br />

plants, and the following companies<br />

that supplied the seeds: Monsanto/De<br />

Ruiter Seeds, Gowan Seed Company,<br />

Harris Moran Seed Company, and<br />

Syngenta Vegetable Seeds.<br />

For More Information<br />

Additional information on our field<br />

trials:<br />

https://ucanr.edu/sites/veg_crop_sjc/<br />

Grafted_tomatoes/<br />

Detailed information on how to<br />

undertake vegetable grafting is available<br />

at: http://www.vegetablegrafting.org/<br />

resources/grafting-manual/<br />

List of tomato rootstocks including<br />

disease resistances and where to order<br />

seed: http://www.vegetablegrafting.org/<br />

resources/rootstock-tables/solanaceousrootstock-table/<br />

Comments about this article? We want<br />

to hear from you. Feel free to email us at<br />

article@jcsmarketinginc.com<br />

22 Progressive Crop Consultant May/June <strong>2019</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!