PCC_MayJun_2019_e
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Continued from Page 20<br />
percentage of fruit in larger size classes<br />
than those produced by the nongrafted<br />
scion varieties. Averaged over<br />
all our trials, the differences in fruit<br />
size distribution between grafted and<br />
non-grafted were fairly small. In some<br />
trials, however, plants on vigorous<br />
rootstocks did have larger fruit. Some<br />
published studies provide measures of<br />
fruit quality, such as dissolved sugars,<br />
pH, total dissolved solids, vitamin C,<br />
lycopene, or even “taste-test” data.<br />
Those studies indicate that the quality<br />
of fruit from grafted plants seems to be<br />
slightly inferior to fruit from the nongrafted<br />
plants, though still commercially<br />
acceptable. Our field trials focused on<br />
yields, and we did not measure any<br />
fruit quality data. However, we did<br />
not notice any fruit defect problems in<br />
grafted vines. Also, in 2018 we did cut<br />
open both red and mature green fruit at<br />
harvest to make sure that there were no<br />
problems inside the fruit.<br />
Variability From Trial to Trial or<br />
Field to Field<br />
A study in Florida with determinant<br />
type cultivars has shown yield<br />
increases of 25 to 42 percent using<br />
certain rootstocks, but year-to-year<br />
variability also increased as compared<br />
to non-grafted plants. This variation<br />
underscores the importance of<br />
considering variable outcomes to<br />
determine the feasibility of grafted<br />
tomatoes here. Some fields will likely<br />
benefit more from grafting than others,<br />
and this may not always be predictable<br />
in advance.<br />
Economics<br />
Costs of field establishment are<br />
increased significantly with grafting.<br />
Material costs for transplanting (seed<br />
plus nursery costs) alone might be<br />
$2,000 per acre or higher or more<br />
than with conventional transplants.<br />
However, we don’t yet really know what<br />
the costs might be if this were adopted<br />
commercially in California, so our plant<br />
costs are based on small volume sales<br />
prices. If we assume a cost of $0.40 per<br />
grafted plant, then a yield increase of<br />
19 percent at a market price of $6.55<br />
per 25-pound box would pay for the<br />
increased plant cost.<br />
On-going and Future Work<br />
Scion Cultivars<br />
(Trial Years)<br />
‘Bobcat’ (2016) ‘DRO137TX’ (2016-18)<br />
‘Dixie Red’ (2016) ‘Maxifort’ (2016-18)<br />
*‘Galilea’ (2016) ‘Arnold’ (2018)<br />
‘HM 1794’ (2016-18) ‘Guardior’ (2018)<br />
‘Quali T 27’ (2017-18) ‘Estamino’ (2018)<br />
‘Quali T 47’ (2017-18)<br />
‘Quali T 99’ (2017-18)<br />
Other research projects looking<br />
at grafting tomatoes are being<br />
conducted in California. A United<br />
States Department of Agriculture<br />
(USDA)-funded project with<br />
processing tomatoes is underway with<br />
collaboration of Gene Miyao, UCCE<br />
Yolo, Solano and Sacramento counties,<br />
Zheng Wang, UCCE Stanislaus County<br />
and myself, in addition to proprietary<br />
research being conducted by the<br />
industry. Rootstocks for heirloom<br />
tomato production are being evaluated<br />
by Margaret Lloyd, small farms advisor<br />
with UCCE in Yolo, Solano and<br />
Sacramento counties.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The California Department of Pesticide<br />
Regulation provided partial funding<br />
for this project but does not necessarily<br />
agree with any opinions expressed, nor<br />
endorse any commercial product or<br />
trade name mentioned. In addition,<br />
this project was supported by the<br />
Specialty Crop Block Grant Program<br />
at the U.S. Department of Agriculture<br />
through Grant 14-SCBGP-CA-0006.<br />
The contents of this report are solely<br />
the responsibility of the authors and<br />
do not necessarily represent the official<br />
views of the USDA. We also thank<br />
our grower-cooperators (Live Oak<br />
Farms and Pacific Triple E), Growers<br />
Transplanting Inc. for producing grafted<br />
Rootstock Cultivars<br />
(Trial Years)<br />
Non-grafted Control<br />
Table 2. Scion and rootstock cultivars used in our field trials.<br />
*Note: Galilea is a roma/saladette type, while the other seven cultivars are all round types; all<br />
but Dixie Red were developed for the Western U.S. mature green production system.<br />
plants, and the following companies<br />
that supplied the seeds: Monsanto/De<br />
Ruiter Seeds, Gowan Seed Company,<br />
Harris Moran Seed Company, and<br />
Syngenta Vegetable Seeds.<br />
For More Information<br />
Additional information on our field<br />
trials:<br />
https://ucanr.edu/sites/veg_crop_sjc/<br />
Grafted_tomatoes/<br />
Detailed information on how to<br />
undertake vegetable grafting is available<br />
at: http://www.vegetablegrafting.org/<br />
resources/grafting-manual/<br />
List of tomato rootstocks including<br />
disease resistances and where to order<br />
seed: http://www.vegetablegrafting.org/<br />
resources/rootstock-tables/solanaceousrootstock-table/<br />
Comments about this article? We want<br />
to hear from you. Feel free to email us at<br />
article@jcsmarketinginc.com<br />
22 Progressive Crop Consultant May/June <strong>2019</strong>