RNR CODC Module 5 Handbook

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2.7 THE EXTERNAL ASSURANCE OF NAVAL TRAINING DELIVERY HRTSG conducts External Validation (ExVal) for the Naval Service, as tasked by Branch Managers (BMs) as Training Requirement Authorities (TRAs) under DACOS(BM). The ExVal team consists of an SO2 TM, an SO3 TM and five Branch-specific analysts. The analysts (OR7-OR9) should be SMEs in their source Branch, capable of day-to-day management of individual projects from start to finish, liaising with stakeholders as required. Tiered ExVal HRTSG will work with BMs to prioritise workload by Branch and across the ExVal team. Provisional work plans should be made, 6- 12 months ahead, of those Courses identified for investigation. Capacity should be allocated for urgent requirements, although in some cases re-prioritisation may be necessary. The prioritised Courses should be split into the following categories: • Quick Look (QL). For maximum efficiency, key project stages are supported by pre-authorised templates. The QL questionnaire template will provide a snapshot as to the effectiveness of a Course in delivering TOs and the relevance of each TO to the associated job. Should responses provide no cause for concern, then it will be concluded that the Course is fit for purpose. If, however, the evidence points to a potentially major shortfall in training, a Full ExVal will be triggered. • Full ExVal. When a BM, for whatever reason, determines that a Course requires more detailed investigation, a Full ExVal will be conducted. The activities over and above the QL include, but are not limited to, expanded or targeted questionnaires; trainee and trainer interviews; enhanced stakeholder engagement; course observation; detailed recommendations. RNR CODC HANDBOOK MODULE 5 » SECTION 8 » UNIT 2.7 41
2.7 THE EXTERNAL ASSURANCE OF NAVAL TRAINING DELIVERY • Project. In some cases, for example Project Faraday, it may be necessary to determine a bespoke ExVal strategy that spans inter-related courses. This is intended to provide the right information to the right people at the right time, taking into account the specific strategic and tactical characteristics of each project. The S3018 Training Feedback form enables any Naval SP to provide information on a perceived shortfall in training. All issues raised will be investigated and receive a reply. The relevant Branch Analyst, in communication with all necessary stakeholders, will assist the BM in determining an outcome which will fall into one of the following categories: • No Action Required. In certain situations, the TRA may be content that no action is required, for example when the issue is not training related; the individual has not conducted the relevant training for whatever reason; the perceived shortfall is not substantiated by documentary and other evidence. • Action Taken. Where suitable actions can be identified quickly by the TRA, the SP who submitted the form will be made aware of the action that their submission has triggered. • Action Pending. In some cases, actions may be identified that cannot be accomplished within a definite time frame owing to a variety of potential factors, such as resources, prioritisation and contractual implications. In such instances, the action will be recorded to ensure it remains visible until a resolution becomes viable. • Noted for Evidence. Where an issue raised triggers a wider investigation or relates to an extant ExVal or Role Analysis project, the feedback captured in the form will be taken as supporting evidence. As such, the issue will be addressed within the wider context of the relevant project. RNR CODC HANDBOOK MODULE 5 » SECTION 8 » UNIT 2.7 42
Page 1 and 2: RNR COMMANDING OFFICER DESIGNATE CO
Page 3 and 4: i MODULE CONTENTS 2.7 The External
Page 5 and 6: i ABOUT MODULE 5 • Explain Initia
Page 7 and 8: 1.1 THE AIM OF DEFENCE TRAINING Mar
Page 9 and 10: 1.3 OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY TRAINING
Page 11 and 12: 1.4 SUPPORT ACTIVITY AND NON-CONTIN
Page 13 and 14: 1.6 ‘PHASE I’ FITNESS AND MEDIC
Page 15 and 16: 1.8 TRAINING BOOKING PROCESS Only t
Page 17 and 18: 1.9 INITIAL NAVAL TRAINING FOR RESE
Page 19 and 20: 1.10 ‘PHASE I’ MILITARISATION F
Page 21 and 22: 1.12 RNR YOUNG OFFICERS’ FLEET BO
Page 23 and 24: 1.13 INITIAL NAVAL TRAINING PROCESS
Page 25 and 26: 1.13 INITIAL NAVAL TRAINING PROCESS
Page 27 and 28: 1.14 UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE DUR
Page 29 and 30: 1.15 THE COMMANDING OFFICERS’ DUT
Page 31 and 32: 1.15 THE COMMANDING OFFICERS’ DUT
Page 33 and 34: 2.2 MANAGEMENT OF THE INITIAL NAVAL
Page 39 and 40: 2.4 PROVISION OF SUITABLY QUALIFIED
Page 41 and 42: 2.6 THE INTERNAL ASSURANCE OF NAVAL
Page 43: 2.6 THE INTERNAL ASSURANCE OF NAVAL
Page 47 and 48: 2.8 THE EXTERNAL ASSURANCE OF NAVAL
Page 49 and 50: 3.1 CORE MARITIME SKILLS (CMS) TRAI
Page 51 and 52: 3.1 CORE MARITIME SKILLS (CMS) TRAI
Page 53 and 54: 3.3 OPPORTUNITIES FOR COLLECTIVE TR
Page 59 and 60: 3.4 NON-CORE TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES
Page 61: 3.5 ADVENTUROUS TRAINING (AT) AND S

RNR CODC Module 5 Handbook

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?