06.08.2019 Views

TELL Magazine August - September 2019

The magazine of Emanuel Synagogue, Sydney Australia

The magazine of Emanuel Synagogue, Sydney Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

{THE CONQUEST OF CANAAN: A CASE STUDY<br />

IN THE EVOLUTION OF SACRED NARRATIVE}<br />

Cantor George Mordecai<br />

The conquest of Canaan has been etched in the consciousness of the Judeo-Christian<br />

world since time immemorial. It is the subject of one of the most popular African<br />

American spirituals of all time. I remember, 41 years ago, as a boy soprano singing<br />

“Joshua Fought the Battle of Jericho” as part of large choir at the Opera House.<br />

The story of the Israelite conquest<br />

of Canaan is an epic! It has been an<br />

inspiration for great works of music<br />

and art as well as serving as a major<br />

theological justification for Jewish<br />

and Christian claims to the Land of<br />

Israel. For most of the period since<br />

the narrative was composed, we have<br />

accepted it as a true and accurate<br />

account of a series of events that did<br />

indeed take place. However, as a<br />

result of the scholarship that emerged<br />

in the wake of the Enlightenment,<br />

the Biblical stories that we hold so<br />

dear were seriously questioned and<br />

subject to historical critique. Scholars<br />

of the Bible saw literary and historical<br />

inconsistencies in the text that had<br />

been identified earlier by Rabbinic<br />

and Christian commentators. The<br />

difference between the approach<br />

of the scholars as opposed to<br />

the Rabbinic and Christian<br />

commentators revolved around the<br />

fact that these scholars were not<br />

bound by theological restrictions.<br />

They were not compelled to resolve<br />

seeming contradictions and problems<br />

in the text in order to fit the text into<br />

a narrative that supported Jewish and<br />

Christian claims of divine authorship.<br />

We would be hard pressed today<br />

to find too many historians who<br />

hold the view that the study of<br />

history is a empirical science.<br />

Nevertheless this ‘scientific position’<br />

was definitely the view of the late<br />

18th and 19th century scholars who<br />

pioneered what became known in<br />

the English speaking world as the<br />

Documentary Hypothesis. So what<br />

was so radically different about<br />

14<br />

this view? Not constrained by the<br />

need for theological conformity,<br />

they concluded that the Bible was<br />

not composed at once but over a<br />

period of many centuries by different<br />

authors who held very different<br />

political and religious world views.<br />

They identified four main authors<br />

whom they called J for those whose<br />

The Taking of Jericho by James Jacques Joseph Tissot<br />

deity was named YHVH; E for<br />

those who worshiped Elohim and<br />

the El pantheon; P for the priestly<br />

caste who were concerned with<br />

the duties of the priesthood; and<br />

D for those who were responsible<br />

for the composition of the book<br />

of Deuteronomy, the fifth book of<br />

the Pentateuch that stands out as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!