04.09.2019 Views

Movement 123

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

can a new book persuade<br />

evangelical christians to care<br />

more about the environment?<br />

evo-friendly?<br />

Ecology and theology have been uncomfortable bedfellows in recent church history.<br />

Christians have shown antagonism towards environmentalists, branding them 'New<br />

Agers', and Christianity has been held by many environmentalists to be responsible for<br />

and unconcerned about the current ecological crisis. This book aims to address this<br />

troubled relationship through contributions by high-profile Christian leaders and academics.<br />

Caring for Creation targets evangelical Christians, a group that will be suspicious of working<br />

towards anything unless given a clear 'biblical' motivation. John Stott's foreword says that<br />

creation is a much-neglected biblical topic, and caring for creation an equally neglected<br />

responsibility. Essays by prominent evangelicals explain how care of the environment is<br />

an inseparable part of God's plan for humanity, covering the biblical themes of creation,<br />

fall, redemption and resurrection. These are interspersed with brief commentaries on the<br />

work of international Christian environmental organisation A Rocha.<br />

ln the opening essay, Eugene Peterson (author of The Message) rambles happily about<br />

the rhythm of creation and how by living in this rhythm, Christians care for creation. His<br />

suggested method for participating in this rhythm appears to be going to church. Subsequent<br />

chapters continue in the same vein, citing the fall as the problem and redemption<br />

as the solution, and asserting that science and religion do not contradict each other<br />

(although one essay dismisses the scientific worldview).<br />

This doesn't really bring any new insights. Too often, 'biblical' arguments for caring for<br />

the earth are based either on simplistic quoting from Genesis, where man is made steward<br />

of creation, or on the flimsy basis that Jesus often used analogies from farming or<br />

the animal kingdom in his teaching. But having a degree of control over and knowledge<br />

about the natural world is a far cry from knowing how to engage with the complicated<br />

systems of global government and economics that Christians find ourselves part of.<br />

Thankfully, things finally get interesting when the discussion comes to Cod's covenant<br />

with lsrael and the Old Testament concepts of the Sabbath and the year of Jubilee. I am<br />

skeptical of how much the Bible can contribute to general environmental debate, but<br />

a pattern of community living that constantly redistributes resources fairly is vital for a<br />

just society. Chris Wright describes this with clarity, and James Houston builds on it by<br />

attributing environment degradation to the breakdown in relationships that leads to individualisation<br />

and consumerism, concluding that'secular environmental concerns are<br />

far too shallow a prognosis of human relations to our environment'.<br />

The final few chapters deal with resurrection and redemption. These concepts can be difficult<br />

to reconcile with environmentalism. The inevitable destruction of the world before<br />

God puts everything right seems to make it pointless to mend anything. Tillett takes the<br />

conventional line: that the resurrection and re-creation of the earth is something to draw<br />

hope from as we obey and worship Cod against a tide of human and natural disasters.<br />

For me, David Bookless' discussion of what is meant by 'a new heaven and a new earth'<br />

is more satisfying. His take on Cod as divine environmentalist, recycling the broken<br />

earth, by analogy with Noah's flood, relates much more closely to what we see around<br />

us in the world - new life springing from the barren wasteland caused by ecological<br />

disaster. lt gave me hope that Christians and environmentalists together can herald this<br />

new life, by living the model of Cod's kingdom on earth.<br />

The A Rocha contributions bring a welcome dose of realism, describing the difficulties<br />

and triumphs of the struggle between human needs and the care of wildlife habitats<br />

around the world. Reading about the competition for space between elephants and<br />

people in lndia and 'crop-destroying elephants and baboons' in Kenya brings a fresh<br />

realisation that conservationism is not abstract nature-loving, but requires serious involvement<br />

with the communities and wildlife who share resources.<br />

Although the first few chapters were disappointing, as a whole the book hangs together<br />

well. There is a set of discussion questions for each chapter, which would work well in<br />

Bible study groups. The book is definitely aimed at an evangelical readership, but the<br />

wealth of different perspectives gives much scope for new thinking. I hope that, by establishing<br />

for Christians how much theology has to do with environmentalism, this book<br />

might help us to address the difficult issues that face the world today. I<br />

foraord by jOHN SfOn<br />

CARING<br />

FOR CREATION<br />

Bil)liril and rheologir al perspective(<br />

. ,<br />

ri, .,rr-:,rL.L:.<br />

caring for creation<br />

edited by Sarah Tillett, BRD €8.99<br />

I am skeptical<br />

of how much<br />

the Bible can<br />

contribute<br />

to $eneral<br />

environmental<br />

debate, but<br />

a pattern of<br />

community<br />

living that<br />

constantly<br />

redistributes<br />

lesoutces fairly<br />

is vital for a<br />

just society<br />

Rosie Telford is a student member<br />

of Christian Ecology Link (www.<br />

ch r i sti a n -eco I ogy. o r g. u k )<br />

l. ";|-rr<br />

B<br />

movement 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!