The Mountain Times - Volume 48, Number 46: November 13-19, 2019
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Opinion<br />
8 • <strong>The</strong> <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Times</strong> • Nov. <strong>13</strong>-<strong>19</strong>, 20<strong>19</strong><br />
OP-ED<br />
Transparency<br />
is part of<br />
government’s job<br />
By Jay Diaz<br />
“<strong>The</strong> liberties of a people never were, nor ever will<br />
be, secure when the transactions of their rulers may<br />
be concealed from them,” said Patrick Henry.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Vermont Supreme Court recently affirmed that<br />
government officials cannot require Vermonters to<br />
pay fees to inspect public records, a common practice<br />
that has hindered government oversight at great cost<br />
to our communities. <strong>The</strong> Court’s decision in Doyle v.<br />
Burlington Police Department reinforced the principle,<br />
enshrined in Vermont’s constitution and laws,<br />
that government transparency and accountability are<br />
vital to a democratic society.<br />
Despite the Court’s ruling, it seems that Vermont<br />
government still has a transparency problem. Following<br />
the decision, officials in state and local government<br />
are already calling for legislation to roll back<br />
Without open access to<br />
public information, we cannot<br />
ensure our government is<br />
accountable for malfeasance.<br />
the Court’s decision, and Vermont Attorney General<br />
T.J. Donovan has created a new rule imposing fees on<br />
anyone who photographs records they are inspecting.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se officials argue that responding to record<br />
requests is a diversion from their “mission,” and requestors<br />
should pay an additional fee for government<br />
employee time spent responding to record requests.<br />
This response reflects a fundamental misunderstanding<br />
of the role of government and how<br />
democracy is supposed to work. Facilitating access<br />
to government records does not divert from our<br />
government’s work, it is our government’s work. As<br />
the Founders knew, only an open government is an<br />
accountable government – providing access to public<br />
records is a part of the government’s job because it<br />
enables the people to engage in self-governance and<br />
prevents our democracy from withering.<br />
Without open access to public information, we<br />
cannot ensure our government is accountable for<br />
malfeasance, corruption, or violations of our rights.<br />
As we have seen, those are costs than can far exceed<br />
the minor expense of complying with a public records<br />
request.<br />
Just last month, the video at the center of the Doyle<br />
case was released by VTDigger. It shows police arresting<br />
children in order to “send a message” while<br />
threatening others with pepper spray. It is another<br />
depiction of law enforcement unnecessarily criminalizing<br />
black and brown children engaged in common<br />
childhood behavior. Countless other videos and<br />
documents showing potential civil rights violations<br />
have been released in just the last few years. But, too<br />
often, exorbitant fees have prevented members of the<br />
press, accountability organizations, and individual<br />
Vermonters from uncovering records like these –<br />
delaying or denying a public reckoning and making<br />
necessary reforms much less likely. Records like these<br />
should not remain concealed behind a paywall.<br />
Government officials may well prefer to avoid the<br />
inconvenience or embarrassment of disclosure, but<br />
that too is beside the point—these are the public’s<br />
Transparency > 9<br />
LETTERS<br />
Thanks for teaching the Vermont<br />
hunter safety class<br />
Dear Editor,<br />
I’d like to thank Mr.<br />
Kevin Carvey, Mr. Aaron<br />
Tinsman, Mr. Rick Hedding<br />
and Brian Connaughton<br />
for instructing<br />
our Vermont Hunter<br />
Safety Class this fall in<br />
Pittsford. I received multiple<br />
praises for the 20<strong>19</strong><br />
Hunter Safety Education<br />
Class instructors.<br />
Earlier this fall, Mr. Nick<br />
Markowski and Brenda<br />
Wilk contacted Aaron<br />
Tinsman to offer this new<br />
opportunity for the Pittsford<br />
Recreation Department<br />
Vermont Hunter<br />
Safety Program.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Tom Fiske Memorial<br />
Foundation, Inc. (a<br />
non-profit) was established<br />
a year after the<br />
death of Tom Fiske in<br />
October of 2000.<br />
Tom was an avid hunter<br />
and outdoorsman who<br />
was killed by the arrow of<br />
another hunter.<br />
<strong>The</strong> foundation was established<br />
to partner with<br />
hunter safety instructors<br />
that educate our youth<br />
about hunter safety. Upon<br />
the graduation of youth<br />
age 15 and under, the<br />
foundation donates a set<br />
number of Lifetime Hunting<br />
Licenses. <strong>The</strong> licenses<br />
are awarded by random<br />
drawing for the graduates.<br />
<strong>The</strong> main fundraiser<br />
for the foundation is our<br />
annual Memorial Golf<br />
Tournament which is held<br />
every August at Neshobe<br />
Country Club. August<br />
2020 will be our 20th year.<br />
Money is raised from hole<br />
sponsorship of $100.00,<br />
and 50/50 drawings at the<br />
tournament. If anyone is<br />
interested in becoming<br />
a hole sponsor for our<br />
20th year, please contact<br />
Brenda Wilk at 438-5677<br />
next June or July. In 20<strong>19</strong>,<br />
they gave away three Vermont<br />
Lifetime Hunting<br />
Licenses.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Pittsford Recreation<br />
Department’s 20<strong>19</strong><br />
recipients of the lifetime<br />
permits were Rehanna<br />
Alger, Caden Munger and<br />
Jacob Whittemore.<br />
On behalf of the Town<br />
of Pittsford Recreation Department<br />
I’d like to thank<br />
Rick Hedding, Kevin Carvey,<br />
Aaron Tinsman and<br />
Brian Connaughton for<br />
their hard work and dedication<br />
to teaching future<br />
generations of hunters<br />
to be ethical. And to say<br />
thank you to the Pittsford<br />
Fire Dept. meeting room<br />
and the VT Police Academy’s<br />
classroom, outside<br />
grounds & shooting range<br />
for being available to the<br />
instructor’s and students!!<br />
Randal S. Adams,<br />
Pittsford Recreation<br />
Director<br />
Vermont must not<br />
resell confiscated<br />
firearms<br />
Dear Editor,<br />
I am astounded and horrified<br />
to hear that confiscated<br />
guns are being sold back<br />
into society in Vermont.<br />
We have an immediate<br />
and serious problem with<br />
guns, and the government<br />
is selling them! <strong>The</strong> article<br />
in the Oct. 30 Seven Days<br />
newspaper states that one<br />
of the reasons for these<br />
sales is a concern that law<br />
enforcement officials will<br />
hesitate to confiscate guns<br />
from those cited or arrested<br />
for domestic abuse because<br />
there isn’t anywhere to put<br />
them. (This action is possible<br />
because of a recently<br />
passed law.) In order to<br />
make space for confiscated<br />
guns to be stored, we are<br />
selling guns to gun dealers<br />
who could be unwittingly<br />
selling them to other people<br />
who shouldn’t have them. It<br />
just doesn’t make any sense.<br />
Our state government<br />
should be working to<br />
reduce the number of guns<br />
out there — not selling<br />
them. Just destroy them. I<br />
am fed up with the cavalier<br />
attitude toward weapons,<br />
while children in school<br />
are trained in what to do if<br />
a shooter shows up. This is<br />
unconscionable. Guns kill<br />
people. <strong>The</strong>se sales should<br />
be stopped immediately.<br />
Deborah Young,<br />
New Haven<br />
By Rick McKee caglecartoons.com<br />
Your paper seems<br />
left-leaning<br />
Dear Editor,<br />
As a first time reader, I<br />
couldn’t help but notice<br />
the deriding of President<br />
Trump’s decision to<br />
remove troops from the<br />
perpetual Syrian/Kurdish/Middle<br />
East conflict<br />
in the superior op-ed<br />
published Nov. 6 while<br />
simultaneously lauding<br />
Senator Aiken for his<br />
call to remove American<br />
troops from Vietnam<br />
some 50 years ago. Does<br />
Does your<br />
publication<br />
offer only<br />
liberal<br />
partisan<br />
views?<br />
your publication offer<br />
only liberal partisan<br />
views or are you open to<br />
conservative commentary<br />
as well?<br />
It’s become fashionable<br />
to hate the president, who<br />
admittedly is no stranger<br />
to making enemies, but<br />
the hypocrisy in opining<br />
negatively in regard<br />
to President Trump and<br />
favorably for one-time<br />
Vermont Senator Aiken<br />
ostensibly for the same<br />
action is confounding.<br />
Aaron Warner,<br />
Rutland