10.02.2020 Views

ARDIENTE

Group Work - See inside

Group Work - See inside

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MECHANICS

2.B Unit with Ribs

For the calculation of the ribs, the same simplification

schemes explained in case 2.A (Fig. XX) is considered.

Moreover, only calculations of deflection are needed in

this approach, since the previous analysis proved that

thickness over 5 mm was resistant against braking

loads. Nevertheless, complete hand calculations were

developed in order to check the results and compare

them with Diana (see Appendix).

Firstly, the structural behaviour of a rib that supports

a 1m wide flat sheet is analysed. The self-weight of

the flat sheet is neglected, so the only force that is

considered is the wind load of 1 kN/m 2 applied from

the top side of the rib (Fig. 86). If we consider 1 m wide

of the flat sheet around the rib, it means that a wind

force of 1kN/m is applied to each rib.

Secondly, an analysis of the wind load from the top

and lateral side of the rib was evaluated in the hand

calculations for deformation. For the calculation of the

deformation, an average between simple supported

and fixed beam deformation was performed, in order to

consider the rest of the forces of the structure. In this

case, since the ribs will be main structural elements,

a deformation less than 1 mm is demanded. In the

end, it could be seen that the top wind load was more

critical for the structural behaviour of the rib, but with

a small difference.

The initially expected dimensions of the ribs in the hand

calculations were increasing gradually, achieving a final

dimension of b=6mm and h=70mm. Nevertheless, like

in the previous cases, the simplification shape leads to

non-reliable results, therefore Diana analysis needs to

be performed and checked.

Finally, an acceptable deflection of under 0.5 mm

was obtained in both cases of wind load. Therefore,

the next step is to calculate the distance between the

calculated ribs.

FIGURE 87: DEFLECTION TOP LOAD

1.0 m

b

h

without self

weight

FIGURE 86: CASE 2B - BEAM SECTION

FIGURE 88: DEFLECTION SIDE LOAD

Top Wind Load

Results H. Calculations Diana Required

δ max 1.85 mm - 0.39 mm in middle of DE <1 mm

TABLE 16: RESULTS TOP WIND LOAD

Side Wind Load

Results H. Calculations Diana Required

δ max 0.08 mm 0.38 mm in D <1 mm

TABLE 17: RESULTS SIDE WIND LOAD

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!