18.03.2020 Views

Study Success in Change - Hungary

Hungarian Change Readiness Index 2019 - A study by Staufen AG

Hungarian Change Readiness Index 2019 - A study by Staufen AG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUCCESS<br />

IN<br />

CHANGE<br />

HUNGARIAN CHANGE READINESS INDEX 2019<br />

A study by Staufen AG


CONTENTS:<br />

ABOUT THE SURVEY.<br />

S. 4<br />

PART 1: GENERAL QUESTIONS.<br />

PART 2: CHANGE READINESS INDEX.<br />

2.1 STRUCTURE.<br />

2.2 PROCESSES.<br />

2.3 MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE CULTURE.<br />

2.4 EMPLOYEES AND QUALIFICATIONS.<br />

S. 5<br />

S. 11<br />

S. 13<br />

S. 21<br />

S. 30<br />

S. 38<br />

PART 3: RESULTS AND OUTLOOK.<br />

S. 46<br />

PART 4: STATISTICAL QUESTIONS.<br />

S. 58<br />

CONTACT.<br />

S. 62


ABOUT THE SURVEY:<br />

FOR THE „HUNGARIAN CHANGE READINESS INDEX 2019“, MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY<br />

STAUFEN SURVEYED A TOTAL OF 104 COMPANIES IN HUNGARY<br />

ON THE SUBJECT OF „SUCCESS IN CHANGE“.<br />

THE SURVEY TOOK PLACE IN SPRING – SUMMER 2019.<br />

57 PERCENT OF THE COMPANIES SURVEYED COME FROM<br />

THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY<br />

THE ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY<br />

THE MECHANICAL AND<br />

PLANT ENGINEERING INDUSTRY.


PART 1:<br />

GENERAL QUESTIONS.


1.1:<br />

How much has your bus<strong>in</strong>ess changed over the past two years?<br />

not at all<br />

2%<br />

less<br />

21%<br />

37%<br />

very much<br />

40%<br />

much<br />

In <strong>Hungary</strong> three quarters of<br />

the companies are experienc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

major changes


1.2:<br />

What were the ma<strong>in</strong> drivers of this transition?<br />

Only participants who have stated <strong>in</strong> the previous question that their company has changed very much or much.<br />

Technological progress (e.g. digitization, networked<br />

production)<br />

<strong>Change</strong> of the work<strong>in</strong>g world (new work<strong>in</strong>g time<br />

models, ...)<br />

Progressive customization of products and services<br />

58%<br />

54%<br />

67%<br />

Globalization of the economy<br />

30%<br />

Demographic transition<br />

29%<br />

Legal changes<br />

18%<br />

Geopolitical developments and upheavals<br />

8%<br />

Participants were allowed to choose up to 4 options<br />

Technological progress and<br />

digitalization is the ma<strong>in</strong> driver<br />

of change


1.3:<br />

Which of the follow<strong>in</strong>g terms do you associate with the topic<br />

of transition?<br />

Innovation Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

Mistrust<br />

Chances Future<br />

Risk<br />

Disruption<br />

Doubt<br />

Openness<br />

Strategy<br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Resistance<br />

Euphoria<br />

Courage<br />

Trust<br />

Sobriety<br />

A good strategy is essential<br />

to keep up <strong>in</strong> times of change


1.3:<br />

Which of the follow<strong>in</strong>g terms do you associate with the topic<br />

of transition?<br />

Future<br />

78%<br />

Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

26%<br />

Strategy<br />

76%<br />

Trust<br />

25%<br />

Innovation<br />

65%<br />

Resistance<br />

20%<br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

58%<br />

Sobriety<br />

15%<br />

Risk<br />

48%<br />

Mistrust<br />

9%<br />

Chances<br />

46%<br />

Doubt<br />

8%<br />

Openness<br />

45%<br />

Disruption<br />

7%<br />

Courage<br />

37%<br />

Euphoria<br />

1%<br />

Participants were allowed to choose up to 8 options<br />

A good strategy is essential<br />

to keep up <strong>in</strong> times of change


1.4:<br />

To what extent do you generally see a risk of disruption for …<br />

very high risk high risk low risk no risk<br />

your <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

18%<br />

37%<br />

40%<br />

5%<br />

your company as a whole<br />

7%<br />

38%<br />

45%<br />

10%<br />

our bus<strong>in</strong>ess model / bus<strong>in</strong>ess models<br />

7%<br />

34%<br />

46%<br />

13%<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual products / services of your<br />

company<br />

2%<br />

40%<br />

46%<br />

12%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

Risk of disruption is seen <strong>in</strong><br />

every second company,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> their own <strong>in</strong>dustry


PART 2:<br />

CHANGE<br />

READINESS INDEX.


varied<br />

composition<br />

openness to change<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

talents<br />

pioneer<strong>in</strong>g spirit<br />

knowledge build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Employees<br />

and qualifications<br />

CHANGE<br />

Structure<br />

cooperative<br />

collaboration<br />

customeroriented<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g a shared vision<br />

agile organization<br />

regular review<br />

positive error<br />

culture<br />

lived values<br />

trust<br />

Management<br />

and corporate<br />

culture<br />

personal<br />

responsibility<br />

Processes<br />

flexible<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous adjustment<br />

lean –<br />

without <strong>in</strong>terfaces<br />

structured<br />

<strong>Success</strong> factors of change


PART 2.1:<br />

CHANGE<br />

READINESS INDEX -<br />

STRUCTURE.


2.1.1: What characterizes your organizational structures?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

<strong>Change</strong>s are usually prescribed from the top<br />

34%<br />

48%<br />

17%<br />

1%<br />

Our organization is strongly focused on<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation<br />

23%<br />

36%<br />

31%<br />

10%<br />

Our company is characterized by flat hierarchies<br />

24%<br />

31%<br />

22%<br />

23%<br />

Our organization is learn<strong>in</strong>g and designed for<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous improvement and systematic problem<br />

solv<strong>in</strong>g. […]<br />

17%<br />

34%<br />

32%<br />

17%<br />

The organizational structures <strong>in</strong> our company are<br />

flexible and changeable<br />

12%<br />

33%<br />

43%<br />

12%<br />

Our organization is more <strong>in</strong>ward-look<strong>in</strong>g and less<br />

open to external impulses<br />

13%<br />

23%<br />

42%<br />

22%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.1.1:<br />

What characterizes your organizational structures?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

Our organization is strongly focused on <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

59%<br />

Our company is characterized by flat hierarchies<br />

55%<br />

Our organization is learn<strong>in</strong>g and designed for<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous improvement and systematic problem<br />

solv<strong>in</strong>g. […]<br />

The organizational structures <strong>in</strong> our company are<br />

flexible and changeable<br />

45%<br />

51%<br />

<strong>Change</strong>s are usually prescribed from the top<br />

82%<br />

Our organization is more <strong>in</strong>ward-look<strong>in</strong>g and less<br />

open to external impulses<br />

36%<br />

Despite all agility:<br />

Most companies still have a<br />

classic organizational structure


2.1.2: Please try to describe your organization us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pairs of terms:<br />

To <strong>in</strong>dicate this, move the slider to the position that suits you.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

product -oriented<br />

1%<br />

17%<br />

13%<br />

26%<br />

34%<br />

9%<br />

Customer-oriented<br />

silo th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1%<br />

13%<br />

13%<br />

25%<br />

40%<br />

8%<br />

cooperative<br />

collaboration<br />

change is a threat<br />

0%<br />

8%<br />

18%<br />

29%<br />

32%<br />

13%<br />

change is opportunity<br />

bureaucratic<br />

13%<br />

16%<br />

25%<br />

23%<br />

14%<br />

9%<br />

unbureaucratic<br />

adher<strong>in</strong>g to plans<br />

5%<br />

8%<br />

14%<br />

34%<br />

30%<br />

9%<br />

situational<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.1.2:<br />

Please try to describe your organization us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pairs of terms:<br />

(expressed <strong>in</strong> average values)<br />

4,0<br />

product-oriented<br />

customer-oriented<br />

silo th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

4,1<br />

cooperative<br />

collaboration<br />

change is a threat<br />

3,4<br />

4,2<br />

change is<br />

opportunity<br />

bureaucratic<br />

unbureaucratic<br />

4,0<br />

adher<strong>in</strong>g to plans<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

situational<br />

Many organizations are<br />

still characterized by<br />

bureaucratic th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g


2.1.3:<br />

To what extent does the follow<strong>in</strong>g apply to your company?<br />

already successfully<br />

implemented<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

developed<br />

planned<br />

nonexistent<br />

A constructive cooperation with suppliers and<br />

customers<br />

28%<br />

53%<br />

19%<br />

0%<br />

Flexible work environments<br />

21%<br />

46%<br />

24%<br />

9%<br />

An <strong>in</strong>terested look outside the box […]<br />

27%<br />

39%<br />

22%<br />

12%<br />

K<strong>in</strong>ds of a trend or change radar<br />

12%<br />

63%<br />

18%<br />

7%<br />

A structured collaboration with other<br />

external partners<br />

11%<br />

53%<br />

21%<br />

15%<br />

Time for open exchange of employees and<br />

executives away from day-to-day bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

21%<br />

38%<br />

18%<br />

23%<br />

Platforms for lateral th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(e.g. creative workshop)<br />

8%<br />

30%<br />

36%<br />

26%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

There is still a lack of<br />

creative th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g among<br />

employees


2.1.4: Based on your company structure, to what extent are you prepared<br />

for emerg<strong>in</strong>g challenges?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

We share a strong vision that shows where the<br />

journey is go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

37%<br />

40%<br />

13%<br />

10%<br />

We actively develop the mutability of our<br />

company<br />

33%<br />

43%<br />

21%<br />

3%<br />

We systematically filter the topics that are<br />

important to us from the multitude of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

18%<br />

57%<br />

19%<br />

6%<br />

We set clear priorities and communicate<br />

transparently<br />

21%<br />

49%<br />

23%<br />

7%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.1.4: Based on your company structure, to what extent are you prepared<br />

for emerg<strong>in</strong>g challenges?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

We share a strong vision that shows where the<br />

journey is go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

77%<br />

We actively develop the mutability of our company<br />

76%<br />

We systematically filter the topics that are<br />

important to us from the multitude of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

We set clear priorities and communicate<br />

transparently<br />

75%<br />

70%<br />

Hungarian companies are optimistic<br />

about their preparation for the future


PART 2.2:<br />

CHANGE<br />

READINESS INDEX -<br />

PROCESSES.


2.2.1: Please describe the status quo based on the follow<strong>in</strong>g questions<br />

yes rather yes rather no no<br />

Is the responsibility for the processes<br />

clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed?<br />

33%<br />

50%<br />

14%<br />

3%<br />

Are your processes comprehensibly<br />

documented?<br />

40%<br />

42%<br />

14%<br />

4%<br />

Are your processes regularly put to the<br />

test?<br />

21%<br />

49%<br />

24%<br />

6%<br />

Are your processes flexible?<br />

21%<br />

49%<br />

27%<br />

3%<br />

Have your processes been reviewed for<br />

future challenges?<br />

23%<br />

41%<br />

30%<br />

6%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.2.1: Please describe the status quo based on the follow<strong>in</strong>g questions<br />

Answers „yes“ + „rather yes“<br />

Is the responsibility for the processes clearly<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed?<br />

83%<br />

Are your processes comprehensibly<br />

documented?<br />

82%<br />

Are your processes regularly put to the test?<br />

70%<br />

Are your processes flexible?<br />

70%<br />

Have your processes been reviewed for future<br />

challenges?<br />

64%<br />

The susta<strong>in</strong>ability of processes<br />

have not yet been checked


2.2.2: What is the idea beh<strong>in</strong>d the processes <strong>in</strong> your company?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

We streaml<strong>in</strong>e our processes<br />

29%<br />

53%<br />

15%<br />

3%<br />

We are strictly committed to our processes<br />

33%<br />

42%<br />

20%<br />

5%<br />

We reduce friction losses with<strong>in</strong> the teams as<br />

much as possible<br />

23%<br />

47%<br />

23%<br />

7%<br />

We pay particular attention to the function<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>in</strong>terfaces<br />

12%<br />

56%<br />

24%<br />

8%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.2.2: What is the idea beh<strong>in</strong>d the processes <strong>in</strong> your company?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

We streaml<strong>in</strong>e our processes<br />

82%<br />

We are strictly committed to our processes<br />

75%<br />

We reduce friction losses with<strong>in</strong> the teams as<br />

much as possible<br />

70%<br />

We pay particular attention to the function<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terfaces<br />

68%<br />

The focus is on<br />

efficient processes


2.2.3: To what extent do you pay attention to a balanced relationship<br />

between dynamics and rout<strong>in</strong>e?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

Innovations are driven systematically and<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>ely by us<br />

11%<br />

52%<br />

29%<br />

8%<br />

Our risk management system cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />

secures our processes<br />

25%<br />

38%<br />

35%<br />

2%<br />

We are able to accelerate processes<br />

18%<br />

44%<br />

32%<br />

6%<br />

We manage complexity with mean<strong>in</strong>gful<br />

<strong>in</strong>struments and develop them cont<strong>in</strong>uously […]<br />

14%<br />

46%<br />

37%<br />

3%<br />

Creative processes are designed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

structured manner<br />

13%<br />

35%<br />

39%<br />

13%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.2.3:<br />

To what extent do you pay attention to a balanced relationship<br />

between dynamics and rout<strong>in</strong>e?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

Innovations are driven systematically and<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>ely by us<br />

63%<br />

Our risk management system cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />

secures our processes<br />

63%<br />

We are able to accelerate processes<br />

62%<br />

We manage complexity with mean<strong>in</strong>gful<br />

<strong>in</strong>struments and develop them cont<strong>in</strong>uously […]<br />

60%<br />

Creative processes are designed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

structured manner<br />

48%<br />

Creative processes are very<br />

unstructured


2.2.4: To what extent do you succeed <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uously adapt<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

to changes?<br />

not at all3% comprehensively<br />

3%<br />

less fully<br />

41%<br />

53%<br />

nearly fully


2.2.4:<br />

To what extent do you succeed <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uously adapt<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

to changes?<br />

comprehensively<br />

nearly fully<br />

3%<br />

53%<br />

56%<br />

believe that they are able<br />

to adapt processes to<br />

changes nearly fully to<br />

comprehensively<br />

Almost half of the companies<br />

are not yet able to cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />

adapt their processes


PART 2.3:<br />

CHANGE<br />

READINESS INDEX -<br />

MANAGEMENT AND<br />

CORPORATE CULTURE.


2.3.1: Which leadership and performance culture prevails <strong>in</strong><br />

your company?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

Target agreements and compensation systems<br />

are predom<strong>in</strong>antly KPI-based<br />

24%<br />

44%<br />

19%<br />

13%<br />

For us, the traditional image of the manager as<br />

the boss prevails<br />

25%<br />

37%<br />

25%<br />

13%<br />

We predom<strong>in</strong>antly fill our management<br />

positions <strong>in</strong>ternally<br />

24%<br />

37%<br />

25%<br />

14%<br />

Our feedback culture is more dictated ritual<br />

than lived communication culture<br />

19%<br />

24%<br />

43%<br />

14%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.3.1:<br />

Which leadership and performance culture prevails <strong>in</strong><br />

your company?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

Target agreements and compensation<br />

systems are predom<strong>in</strong>antly KPI-based<br />

68%<br />

For us, the traditional image of the<br />

manager as the boss prevails<br />

62%<br />

We predom<strong>in</strong>antly fill our management<br />

positions <strong>in</strong>ternally<br />

61%<br />

Our feedback culture is more dictated ritual<br />

than lived communication culture<br />

43%<br />

Traditional leadership culture<br />

prevails <strong>in</strong> 62% of all companies


2.3.2: How would you describe the corporate culture of your<br />

company <strong>in</strong> general?<br />

To <strong>in</strong>dicate this, move the slider to the position that suits you.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

conservative attitude<br />

13%<br />

15%<br />

25%<br />

26%<br />

16%<br />

5%<br />

pioneer<strong>in</strong>g spirit<br />

focus on the guilt question<br />

5%<br />

13%<br />

26%<br />

34%<br />

15%<br />

7%<br />

positive error culture<br />

values exist only on paper<br />

3%<br />

13%<br />

23%<br />

25%<br />

26%<br />

10%<br />

values are lived<br />

control<br />

10%<br />

11%<br />

28%<br />

23%<br />

23%<br />

5%<br />

trust<br />

external control<br />

7%<br />

16%<br />

13%<br />

35%<br />

21%<br />

8%<br />

personal responsibility<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.3.2:<br />

How would you describe the corporate culture of your<br />

company <strong>in</strong> general?<br />

(expressed <strong>in</strong> average values)<br />

conservative<br />

attitude<br />

3,3<br />

pioneer<strong>in</strong>g spirit<br />

focus on the guilt question<br />

3,6<br />

positive error<br />

culture<br />

3,9<br />

values exist only on paper<br />

values are lived<br />

3,5<br />

control<br />

trust<br />

3,7<br />

external control<br />

personal responsibility<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Corporate culture:<br />

somewhere between a pioneer<br />

spirit and <strong>in</strong>dependence


2.3.3:<br />

How is good leadership promoted <strong>in</strong> your company? Which<br />

<strong>in</strong>struments do you already use?<br />

already successfully<br />

implemented<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g developed planned nonexistent<br />

Program for systematic leadership development<br />

23%<br />

30%<br />

26%<br />

21%<br />

Executive coach<strong>in</strong>g or supervision<br />

20%<br />

31%<br />

18%<br />

31%<br />

Use of Shop Floor Management<br />

25%<br />

15%<br />

24%<br />

36%<br />

Forward-look<strong>in</strong>g succession plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

management positions<br />

18%<br />

20%<br />

47%<br />

15%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

Only every fourth company<br />

has experience with<br />

Shop Floor Management


2.3.4: What are your current challenges <strong>in</strong> leadership and<br />

corporate culture?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

We f<strong>in</strong>d it difficult to establish/implement<br />

management structures that support the<br />

change of the company […]<br />

20%<br />

31%<br />

33%<br />

16%<br />

We follow an outdated understand<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

leadership and career<br />

21%<br />

28%<br />

25%<br />

26%<br />

We have big problems to fill leadership positions<br />

15%<br />

20%<br />

44%<br />

21%<br />

Here, there are generational clashes caused by<br />

attitudes, abilities and life goals<br />

10%<br />

21%<br />

36%<br />

33%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.3.4:<br />

What are your current challenges <strong>in</strong> leadership and<br />

corporate culture?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

We f<strong>in</strong>d it difficult to establish/implement<br />

management structures that support the<br />

change of the company […]<br />

51%<br />

We follow an outdated understand<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

leadership and career<br />

49%<br />

We have big problems to fill leadership positions<br />

35%<br />

Here, there are generational clashes caused by<br />

attitudes, abilities and life goals<br />

31%<br />

Companies f<strong>in</strong>d it difficult<br />

to anchor leadership forms<br />

which support change


PART 2.4:<br />

CHANGE<br />

READINESS INDEX -<br />

EMPLOYEES AND<br />

QUALIFICATIONS.


2.4.1: How well are the employees <strong>in</strong> your company prepared for the<br />

work environment 4.0?<br />

very well well less well not well<br />

at all<br />

Diverse composition of the workforce with<br />

different qualifications, talents, work experience<br />

and personalities<br />

13%<br />

49%<br />

31%<br />

7%<br />

Will<strong>in</strong>gness to face new challenges<br />

18%<br />

43%<br />

33%<br />

6%<br />

Openness of employees towards <strong>in</strong>struments<br />

and behavior of modern management<br />

8%<br />

46%<br />

39%<br />

7%<br />

Current state of knowledge on topics such as<br />

Industry 4.0, digitization and <strong>in</strong>ternationalization<br />

3%<br />

28%<br />

57%<br />

12%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.4.1:<br />

How well are the employees <strong>in</strong> your company prepared for the<br />

work environment 4.0?<br />

Answers „very well“ + „well“<br />

Diverse composition of the workforce with<br />

different qualifications, talents, work experience<br />

and personalities<br />

62%<br />

Will<strong>in</strong>gness to face new challenges<br />

61%<br />

Openness of employees towards <strong>in</strong>struments<br />

and behavior of modern management<br />

54%<br />

Current state of knowledge on topics such as<br />

Industry 4.0, digitization and <strong>in</strong>ternationalization<br />

31%<br />

There is still a lack of<br />

necessary knowledge for<br />

the work environment 4.0


2.4.2: To what extent do your employees identify with the company?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

Our employees are loyal to their employer<br />

26%<br />

51%<br />

21%<br />

2%<br />

Our employees are proud of their employer<br />

26%<br />

46%<br />

21%<br />

7%<br />

The team spirit among the employees is high<br />

20%<br />

52%<br />

23%<br />

5%<br />

Confidence <strong>in</strong> the executives is high<br />

21%<br />

43%<br />

31%<br />

5%<br />

Our employees do only what they are told to<br />

do, not more<br />

17%<br />

47%<br />

33%<br />

3%<br />

There is more of a culture of mistrust <strong>in</strong> our<br />

company<br />

13%<br />

16%<br />

30%<br />

41%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.4.2:<br />

To what extent do your employees identify with the company?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

Our employees are loyal to their employer<br />

77%<br />

Our employees are proud of their employer<br />

72%<br />

The team spirit among the employees is high<br />

72%<br />

Confidence <strong>in</strong> the executives is high<br />

64%<br />

Our employees do only what they are told to<br />

do, not more<br />

64%<br />

There is more of a culture of mistrust <strong>in</strong> our<br />

company<br />

29%<br />

“Work<strong>in</strong>g by rule” is widespread<br />

amongst employees


2.4.3:<br />

What is your company do<strong>in</strong>g to make employees fit for the<br />

Flexible Workplace 4.0?<br />

already successfully<br />

implemented<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g developed planned nonexistent<br />

The personnel development is <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the strategic management<br />

22%<br />

33%<br />

22%<br />

23%<br />

We work with IT-supported tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g as well as<br />

e-learn<strong>in</strong>g and self-learn<strong>in</strong>g […]<br />

28%<br />

27%<br />

22%<br />

23%<br />

We carry out systematic competence<br />

analyses […]<br />

12%<br />

28%<br />

33%<br />

27%<br />

We have regulations on holidays, salaries and<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g hours that fit <strong>in</strong> with the work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environment 4.0<br />

15%<br />

22%<br />

15%<br />

48%<br />

There is a cross-company talent management<br />

15%<br />

19%<br />

23%<br />

43%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

Only every second company<br />

prepares its employees for the<br />

Flexible Workplace 4.0


2.4.4: What challenges does your company face <strong>in</strong><br />

personnel management?<br />

applies<br />

applies more<br />

or less<br />

applies less<br />

does not<br />

apply<br />

We have great problems f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suitable employees<br />

34%<br />

46%<br />

15%<br />

5%<br />

There are too few resources for necessary<br />

accompany<strong>in</strong>g and further education measures<br />

23%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

7%<br />

There is uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about future-proof<br />

requirements profiles of employees <strong>in</strong> the age<br />

of Industry 4.0<br />

22%<br />

41%<br />

25%<br />

12%<br />

There is a lack of knowledge about the talents<br />

and special abilities of our employees<br />

14%<br />

23%<br />

37%<br />

26%<br />

Our employees have little <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong><br />

personal development<br />

5%<br />

32%<br />

39%<br />

24%<br />

Our employees perceive their daily work<br />

as mean<strong>in</strong>gless<br />

3%<br />

12%<br />

40%<br />

45%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


2.4.4:<br />

What challenges does your company face <strong>in</strong><br />

personnel management?<br />

Answers „applies“ + „applies more or less“<br />

We have great problems f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suitable employees<br />

80%<br />

There are too few resources for necessary<br />

accompany<strong>in</strong>g and further education measures<br />

There is uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about future-proof<br />

requirements profiles of employees <strong>in</strong> the age<br />

of Industry 4.0<br />

63%<br />

63%<br />

There is a lack of knowledge about the talents<br />

and special abilities of our employees<br />

37%<br />

Our employees have little <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong><br />

personal development<br />

37%<br />

Our employees perceive their daily work<br />

as mean<strong>in</strong>gless<br />

15%<br />

Companies have difficulties<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g suitable employees


PART 3:<br />

RESULTS<br />

AND OUTLOOK.


3.1: To what extent do you see your company prepared for the future <strong>in</strong><br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g areas?<br />

highly prepared prepared less prepared not prepared at all<br />

Structure<br />

8%<br />

56%<br />

29%<br />

7%<br />

Processes<br />

12%<br />

44%<br />

41%<br />

3%<br />

Leadership and corporate<br />

culture<br />

19%<br />

39%<br />

32%<br />

10%<br />

Employees and<br />

qualifications<br />

5%<br />

46%<br />

41%<br />

8%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


3.1:<br />

To what extent do you see your company prepared for the future <strong>in</strong><br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g areas?<br />

average values<br />

Structure<br />

2,66<br />

Processes<br />

2,64<br />

Leadership and corporate<br />

culture<br />

2,66<br />

Employees and<br />

qualifications<br />

2,47<br />

0 1 2 3 4<br />

not prepared at all<br />

highly prepared<br />

Companies have the biggest<br />

problems <strong>in</strong> the areas<br />

employees and qualifications


<strong>Change</strong> Read<strong>in</strong>ess Index (CRI) of Hungarian companies<br />

on a scale from 0 = "not at all" to 100 = "complete"<br />

Overall <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

Structures.<br />

Processes.<br />

Leadership and corporate culture.<br />

Employees and qualifications.<br />

54<br />

58<br />

61<br />

50<br />

51<br />

With the CRI companies are best<br />

positioned regard<strong>in</strong>g processes


3.2:<br />

Please judge the responsiveness to change <strong>in</strong> …<br />

very well well less well not well at all<br />

your bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

17%<br />

46%<br />

27%<br />

10%<br />

your <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

10%<br />

54%<br />

36%<br />

0%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

Companies see themselves<br />

as average <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

terms of change


Assessment of adaptability<br />

on a scale from 0 = "not at all" to 100 = "complete"<br />

Structures<br />

perceived change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

actual change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

58<br />

67<br />

perception gap<br />

10<br />

Processes<br />

perceived change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

actual change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

61<br />

66<br />

5<br />

Management<br />

perceived change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

actual change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

50<br />

67<br />

17<br />

Employees &<br />

qualifications<br />

perceived change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

actual change read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

51<br />

40 50 60 70<br />

62<br />

11<br />

Companies overestimate<br />

their adaptability to change


3.3: To what extent will your company change <strong>in</strong> the years ahead?<br />

to a great extent to a moderate extent to a lesser extent not at all<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the next two years<br />

17%<br />

42%<br />

36%<br />

5%<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the next five years<br />

31%<br />

55%<br />

12%<br />

2%<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the next ten years<br />

59%<br />

34%<br />

7%<br />

0%<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


3.3:<br />

To what extent will your company change <strong>in</strong> the years ahead?<br />

Answers „to a great extent “ + „to a moderate extent “<br />

86%<br />

93%<br />

59%<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the next<br />

two years<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the next<br />

five years<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the next<br />

ten years<br />

<strong>Change</strong> is happen<strong>in</strong>g at a rapid pace:<br />

60 percent expect major changes<br />

with<strong>in</strong> two years


3.4:<br />

To what extent have you established Lean Management<br />

<strong>in</strong> your company?<br />

21%<br />

26%<br />

34%<br />

9% 10%<br />

Level 0 −<br />

no lean management<br />

measures <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

Stufe 1 −<br />

a cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

improvement process<br />

has been established<br />

Level 2 −<br />

value added is aligned<br />

with the ma<strong>in</strong> Lean<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

Stufe 3 −<br />

even the <strong>in</strong>direct areas<br />

already follow Lean<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

Level 4 −<br />

strategy and organization<br />

comprehensively<br />

implement the Lean<br />

philosophy<br />

Lean on the rise:<br />

47 percent of companies still<br />

have a long way to go


CRI<br />

100<br />

Relationship between the degree of implementation of<br />

Lean Management and the change read<strong>in</strong>ess of companies<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

The <strong>Change</strong> Read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Index (CRI) <strong>in</strong>creases by<br />

3 po<strong>in</strong>ts with every<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Lean level<br />

Lean levels<br />

Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4<br />

There is a clear connection<br />

between Lean and<br />

read<strong>in</strong>ess for <strong>Change</strong>


Ln CRI<br />

5,0<br />

Relationship between the degree of implementation of<br />

Lean Management and the change read<strong>in</strong>ess of companies<br />

4,8<br />

4,5<br />

4,3<br />

4,0<br />

3,8<br />

3,5<br />

3,3<br />

3,0<br />

2,8<br />

The <strong>Change</strong> Read<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Index (CRI) <strong>in</strong>creases by<br />

5.25 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

with every <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Lean level<br />

Lean levels<br />

Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4<br />

There is a clear connection<br />

between Lean and<br />

read<strong>in</strong>ess for <strong>Change</strong>


PART 4:<br />

STATISTICAL<br />

QUESTIONS.


4.1: What <strong>in</strong>dustry does your company operate <strong>in</strong>?<br />

Mechanical and plant eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

25%<br />

Construction <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Electrical <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Automotive <strong>in</strong>dustry - OEM/System supplier<br />

Automotive <strong>in</strong>dustry – classical/traditional<br />

supplier or subcontractor<br />

9%<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

Aerospace<br />

Chemical-pharmaceutical <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Medical eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Food and beverage <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Banks and <strong>in</strong>surance<br />

Energy<br />

Other services<br />

0%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

9%<br />

Other 16%


4.2: How many employees does your company have?<br />

up to 99<br />

23%<br />

100 – 249<br />

250 – 499<br />

16%<br />

16%<br />

500 – 999<br />

12%<br />

1.000 – 4.999<br />

19%<br />

more than 5.000 14%<br />

4.3: How big is your annual turnover?<br />

up to 49 Mio. euros<br />

50 – 249 Mio. euros<br />

250 – 499 Mio. euros 10%<br />

500 Mio. – 1 billion euros 2%<br />

more than 1 billion euros 9%<br />

no details 14%<br />

27%<br />

38%


4.4: What role do you play <strong>in</strong> your company?<br />

Shareholder / owner<br />

9%<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g Partner<br />

4%<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g Director / Board<br />

24%<br />

Division Manager<br />

5%<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> Department Manager<br />

Department or Team Manager<br />

10%<br />

17%<br />

Other<br />

31%


INSIDE EVERY COMPANY<br />

THERE IS AN EVEN BETTER ONE.<br />

STAUFEN.AG<br />

Consult<strong>in</strong>g.Academy.Investment<br />

Blumenstraße 5<br />

73257 Köngen<br />

Germany<br />

+49 7024 8056 0<br />

www.staufen.ag<br />

Balázs Garliczky<br />

Country Manager <strong>Hungary</strong><br />

+36 70 236 16 80<br />

b.garliczky@staufen.ag<br />

Róbert Velenczei<br />

Country Manager <strong>Hungary</strong><br />

+36 20 380 10 39<br />

robert.velenczei@staufen.ag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!