06.04.2020 Views

St Mary Redcliffe project 450 Initial Options Appraisal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.0 EXPLORING OPPORTUNITY - HERITAGE ASSET REVIEW<br />

To gain a greater understanding of <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong>’s collection of artefacts, their signifi cance<br />

and condition, a Heritage Asset Review was undertaken by Rita McClean, Museums & Heritage<br />

Consultant<br />

The review engaged with the Archivists of both <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong> and Bristol City Council to:<br />

1. Assess and catalogue the relevant physical objects and archives held in each collection<br />

2. Establish their capacity to illustrate key themes, including the:<br />

• Architectural development of the church<br />

• Donors/benefactors who funded or commissioned works<br />

• Artists and craftspeople involved in their creation<br />

• Items originally created for other locations, such as the font from <strong>St</strong> John’s Bedminster<br />

• Notable people associated with <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong>, including Canynges, Cabot, Chatterton, etc<br />

• Function of the church as a place of worship<br />

• Role of the church in the parish: its charitable activities, the provision of schooling, etc<br />

• Church as a landowner<br />

Additionally, in recognition of the piece’s potential signifi cance to Project <strong>450</strong>, and further to<br />

Section 6.0, the Heritage Asset Review also provides a specifi c assessment of William Hogarth’s<br />

Triptych, including:<br />

• The artistic and ecclesiastical signifi cance of the Triptych<br />

• Narratives surrounding the painting’s mid-C18 commission by the vestry of <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong><br />

• The relationship between the work and Bristol’s wealth, status, and ambition at this time<br />

• Hogarth, as an artist, and the potential reasons for this atypical commission<br />

• Hogarth, as social commentator, and his association with charitable works<br />

• The religious symbolism depicted in the work<br />

• The painting’s removal from <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong>, and subsequent ‘wanderings around the city’<br />

• The painting’s potential return to <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong><br />

• The potential heritage engagement associated with its conservation and reinstatement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!