05.05.2020 Views

May Edition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MAY 2020 EDITION

NEWS FROM MHCE I WWW.MHCE.US

MHCE News

More Than 180 Military Medical Students

Graduate Early to Help with COVID-19 Crisis

By Jared Serbu | @jserbuWFED

The normal graduation date for the

military’s latest class of uniformed health

care providers is still about six weeks

away. But on Wednesday, the Defense

Department’s premiere medical school

conferred degrees to nearly 200 new

doctors and nurses so that they can

begin to help combat the coronavirus

pandemic sooner rather than later.

The Uniformed Services University of

the Health Sciences granted degrees to

150 M.D. students and 33 advance practice

nurses, including clinical nurse specialists,

family health, women’s health

and mental health nurse practitioners,

officials said. Another 26 nurse anesthesia

students will graduate on May 1,

once they’ve met all of their educational

requirements.

For the most part, the new graduates will

stay in the national capital region to help

with the military’s immediate coronavirus

needs there before moving on to

residency programs this summer.

Dr. Art Kellerman, the dean of USU’s

F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine,

said the school’s first-ever “virtual

commencement” was possible mainly

because of a coincidence of timing.

“At this point in the academic year for

most medical schools, including ours,

students are finishing up final electives

that are nice to have — but not essential

to have — to fully complete a medical

degree,” Kellerman said in an interview

for Federal News Network’s On DoD.

“And so as we saw the coming storm of

COVID, we thought it was important to

lean forward with this class and have

them ready in the event that they need

to engage to support the mission.”

in early July. In the meantime, Defense

medical officials think there are numerous

crisis-related tasks they’re already

well qualified to perform, should they

be needed during DoD’s coronavirus

response.

He said that’s largely because USU’s

curriculum and internship programs

make its graduates, all of whom are

commissioned military officers, uniquely-prepared

to deal with a situation like

a viral pandemic.

“They take the same courses and they

have to pass the same tests that every

civilian medical school gives. But they

also get about 700 hours of additional

instruction in tropical medicine, operational

medicine, tactical combat casualty

care, portable ultrasound, telehealth,

and other skills that are vital on the

battlefield or when you’re practicing in

remote or austere settings, or when you

are put in a situation where you don’t

have all the facts or all the information,”

Kellerman said.

“When you have people with that

psychological makeup, who have gone

through field exercises for multiple days

in a row, or have done prolonged field

care with some of the top Special Operations

docs in the world, and tell them,

‘We’re going to need you to get ready in

the next four more days to potentially

start assessing COVID patients coming in

to Walter Reed,’ they’ll do it. They’ll rise

to the occasion. They’ve done it before.”

Now that most of this year’s graduating

class is finished with their USU schooling,

the university is focused on ways

to adapt its curriculum to incorporate

more distance learning, in case COV-

ID-19 and social distancing are still

factors in the fall semester.

ured out ways to move many of its classes

online. But there are parts of medical education

that are much more challenging to

adapt to a virtual environment.

“How do you do a clinical clerkship in

medicine or pediatrics or surgery, when

the entire hospital is focused for the moment

on COVID? The answer is you really

can’t,” he said. “So at the moment, virtually

every medical student in America is not

in a teaching hospital, doing what they

would normally do in surgery or medicine.

We hope to be one of the first schools

back with the ability to do that as we work

through this pandemic, but that hasn’t

happened yet.

How do you train students in procedural

skills that would typically require

students working together in very close

proximity to each other? That can’t be

done either under the current guidance,

so we have to find other ways to educate

them in those skills.

To some degree, we’re inventing this as it

goes along, and we’re freely sharing our

knowledge and skills with other medical

schools. We’ll get through this together.”

Kellerman said most of the students will

most likely start their formal residencies

Like many other colleges and universities,

Kellerman said USU had already fig-


2

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

EOTech’s Holographic Weapons

Sights Are Simply Amazing

The Buzz

While good eyesight and a steady

hand have always been crucial in

marksmanship, there have been

plenty of tools that have given the

shooter an edge.

One of the most important could be

the “Holographic Weapons Sights”

(HWS) developed by Michigan-based

EOTech.

Back in 1996, the company – which

evolved from a non-profit research

institute – first developed a prototype

holographic-based weapon sight for

use in U.S. Army helicopter gunships

and anti-aircraft artillery systems.

Then in 1993 ERIM formed the Michigan

Development Corporation (MDC)

to commercialize technology that

could be spun off as for-profit subsidiaries

and in 1995 this lead to the

creation of EOTech.

This led to the first-generation HWS,

which was marked under the trade

name Bushnell HoloSight – a product

that won the Optic of the Year Award

from the Shooting Industry Academy

of Excellence.

In 2001 the military and law enforcement

communities adopted the HWS

sights, and in 2005 Special Operations

(SOCOM) and the United States

Marine Corps chose HWS as their

standard close combat optic.

Advantages of HWS

The primary advantage of HWS is

that it provides an extremely fast and

easy target acquisition for operators

in the field, and this includes both

eyes open for engagement, which

allows for full peripheral vision and

situational awareness – something

that is crucial for those in combat situations.

The sight’s anti-reflective coatings

and flat front window further minimize

image distortion and muzzle

side reflection, while the sights also

offer optimal off-axis usage when

proper cheek weld or sight alignment

isn’t possible.

HWS technology has an advantage

over standard “Red Dot” sights – the

latter utilizing an LED light source

and reflex sight. The HWS system

instead is built around a laser diode,

folding mirror, collimating reflector

and holographic grating. The holographic

reticle can even continue to

function when the window is broken

or obscured, something no other sight

can do.

The HWS also utilizes a “Speed Ring”

reticle, so that the outside to outside of

the circle equals a 5-foot 9-inch man

at 100 yards.

The all-weather sights are water-resistant

to thee to 10 meters depending

on model, and will perform in temperatures

ranging from -4ºF to 1224ºF.

Unlike most Red Dot sights, HWS is

also night vision-compatible, offers a

wide field-of-view, even when used

with a helmet or weapon-mounted

night-vision devices.

An NV toggle button also allows operators

to instantly switch from NV to

daylight to the last setting used. The

sights offer adjustable reticle brightness

with 30 settings for NV models

and 20 for all non-NV models.

Commitment to Quality

The Southeast Michigan company

was acquired in 2005 by L3 Technologies,

one the world’s largest defense

contractors with more than $9.6 billion

in sales in 2017.

EOTech is also the only consumer facing

division and it currently operates

out of a 30,000 square foot facility that

is truly a mix of traditional assembly

line production utilizing skills workers

with high-tech quality control to produce

truly cutting edge products.

Part of the Michigan-based company’s

commitment to quality was to repair

its reputation and trust with customers

following the civil fraud lawsuit

that involved defective rifle sights.

That included parent company L3

Technologies paying $25.6 million to

settle a lawsuit that accused the defense

firm of reportedly knowingly

selling optics that failed in extreme

temperatures and humid weather

conditions.

In 2017 the company even held a voluntary

buyback of sights, and the defective

products were then sent to be

crushed and destroyed.

EOTech was awarded a $26.3 million

five-year contract from the U.S. Special Operations

Command (USSOCOM) to provide

close-quarters sights and clip-on magnifiers

for the Miniature Aiming System–Day Optics

suite.

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who

has contributed to more than four dozen

magazines, newspapers and websites.

He is the author of several books on military

headgear including A Gallery of Military

Headdress, which is available on Amazon.

com.


WWW.MHCE.US MHCE News 3

TRANSCOM Awards $7B to Revamp

Military Moving Process

addresses long-standing pain points DoD

families have highlighted for years.”

The Global Household Goods contract puts

one company in charge of overseeing hundreds

of contractors helping with the more

than 400,000 military moves conducted

each year.

The contract is supposed to cut back on accountability

problems within the moving process.

Some of those were illuminated in a DoD

Inspector General report from earlier this

year, which found 41% of shipments made

by moving contractors and reviewed by the

DoD IG were not delivered on time.

By Scott Maucione

U.S. Transportation Command

awarded a more than $7.2 billion

contract that will completely

change the way the Defense Department

manages military moves.

TRANSCOM awarded the contract

on Thursday to American Roll On

Roll Off Carrier Group (ARC), located

in Parsippany, New Jersey.

“DoD families are our north star

and the reason we are making this

change to the Defense Personal

Property Program,” said Army Gen.

Stephen Lyons, USTRANSCOM

commander in a Thursday statement.

“The contract was written by

and for the military services, and

Right now, those duties fall to 42 separate

government-managed shipping offices,

each of which hires moving companies on

a one-off basis each time a service member

receives permanent change of station (PCS)

orders. TRANSCOM said that decentralized

system is “fundamentally flawed,” mainly because

it doesn’t allow for long-term contracting

relationships with movers, and gives the

government few ways to hold them accountable

for poor performance.

“We need to gain accountability of industry

and we need to improve responsibility in

the department, because it’s bifurcated today,”

Lyons said in January. “At the end of

the day, we want to create the right incentive

structures so that during peak season, when

most of the moves take place and capacity

is depleted, we can increase the capacity to

support peak-season moves. That’s our objective.”

TRANSCOM and ARC will spend the next

nine months integrating IT systems and processes.

The first move under the new system

will be conducted next February and

ARC will be in charge of all of the domestic

moves during the peak summer season of

2021. It will handle all domestic and international

moves by the summer of 2022. ARC

partnered with a group of subcontractors to

carry out the moves and will ensure at least

40% of domestic work flows down to small

businesses.

“Small businesses are—and will remain—the

backbone of this program,” said Rick Marsh,

director of the defense personal property

program at USTRANSCOM. “If a company delivers

a quality product in today’s program,

there is room for them in tomorrow’s. Their

capacity will remain critical as long as DoD

moves personnel and their families around

the globe.”


4

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION


WWW.MHCE.US MHCE News 5

Why Top Business Schools Want Veteran

MBA Students in Their Classrooms

By Kelly Vo

Veterans make excellent MBA candidates.

From well-developed leadership skills

to creativity, resiliency, adaptability, and

perseverance, they have many of the attributes

required to be successful both in the

military and in business. They make versatile

candidates and employers with a high

record of success.

In honor of Veteran’s Day, we thought we’d

interview four veterans who are attending

some of the top MBA programs in the country:

NYU Stern School of Business, MIT Sloan

School of Management, and the University of

Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. Our goal is

to share their stories and provide reflections

from their time in the military.

Going Back to School to Explore OpportunitiesEarning

an MBA is a great way to open

up new employment opportunities, particularly

when leaving the military for life as a

civilian.

An MBA can help you develop a better idea

of what you want to accomplish in the future

while also helping you develop the knowledge

and insight necessary to succeed in

the business world.

That was the case for Lorelei Gaus, a second-year

MBA student at the Wharton

School. “I decided to earn an MBA because

it was so far outside my previous education

and background.

I had never taken an accounting or finance

course before Wharton, and I knew that I

really lacked in this department,” she told us.

After just a year at Wharton, Gaus feels like

she already has so many more tools in her

arsenal to not only understand but rigorously

analyze complex business problems.

As for Chris Costello, a second-year MBA

student at NYU Stern, earning an MBA was

a way to take his military experience and

leverage it in business. “I gained a lot from

my military experience and am thankful

for having worked with very high-caliber

people on impactful missions,” he explained.

“Coming to NYU Stern has been a tremendous

way to transition. The administration

does an incredible job of supporting student

veterans.”

Military Preparation for the MBA

No veteran comes into the MBA world without

a wide variety of valuable experiences

already. The truth of the matter is that many

skills that are vital to a successful military

career are immediately transferable toward

an MBA.

For Sam Daly, a veteran in NYU Stern’s

Class of 2020, that was definitely the case.

“Time management, leadership, backward

planning, working with people from diverse

backgrounds, and staying organized are all

things that most successful service members

should have in their skill set, and they are

crucial to succeeding in an MBA program,”

he explained. “Another thing that a military

background provides MBA candidates is

perspective and resiliency. Our real-life

experiences serve as a ballast against the

stressors and anxieties of entering a new

chapter of our lives.”

It was the same for Ashley Pelzek, a second-year

MBA student at MIT Sloan. After

being in the military for 11 years, she had a

lot to bring to her MBA experience. “Business

schools look for candidates who are

innovative, creative, and demonstrate leadership

qualities,” Pelzek said.

“You would think that creativity and innovation

would be difficult for veterans used to

following orders, but we’re actually really

good at taking assignments and figuring out

creative solutions in impossible situations.

That’s what we’re faced with all the time in

the military.”

The difficulty is knowing how to demonstrate

those qualities in a resume and on an application.

But a quality MBA program will help

you figure out how to convey all your military

experiences in a way that makes sense

for business.


6

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

DOD NEEDS TO USE A SCALPEL

IF IT CUTS MEDICAL FORCE,

MEDICAL CORPS EDUCATOR SAYS

By Scott Maucione

As the military changes

its needs to focus on

near-peer competition,

the Pentagon needs to

be careful about how it

readjusts the size of its

medical corps.

Richard Thomas, president

of the Uniformed

Services University — a

federally-funded school

that trains medical and

nursing students for

military service — says

the Defense Department

can’t readjust its

medical personnel with

a “sledgehammer or a

meat cleaver,” but rather

must take a scalpel to the

corps.

Thomas’ comments

come as multiple outlets

reported that DoD is considering

cutting its medical

corps by as much as

17,000 people. The plan

is to convert those billets

into combat-ready service

members to make

the force more lethal.

Thomas told Federal

News Network that DoD

sent the services targets

for how much they

should cut their medical

staff and the services

are now calculating if

those cuts are possible.

The current active duty,

reserve and guard medical

corps has about

186,000 staff.

“This is really not unusual,”

Thomas said. “At

the end of every cycle of

heightened operations

or combat operations

we tend to have a right sizing

of the force and that’s

what’s going on here.

The military is saying

‘OK, let’s look at what you

have grown in the medical

community. What do you

need, what’s your requirement

and then we will adjust

accordingly.’”

Thomas said one thing is

different about the way

the military reassesses its

medical corps as it distances

itself from the Middle

East and focuses more

toward Russia and China.

That difference is the Defense

Health Agency — the

umbrella medical organization

formed in 2013 that

will take many medical

responsibilities from the

services.

“It’s not just the services

on their own doing the assessment,”

Thomas said.

“One of the main functions

of DHA is to help to coalesce,

so you are looking at

things from an enterprise

perspective and not from

as separate service perspective.”

Still, DoD relies on the

services’ ability to tell

the Pentagon what they

need.“What is the medical

capability we want to

be able to project around

the globe to support our

forces in austere environments?”

Thomas said. “The services

have the responsibility

of defining that requirement

to meet that capability

requirement.”Assessing

the size of the medical

force may be more contentious

than it seems,

however.

A Feb. 21 Government

Accountability Office report

found DoD does not

have a uniform way of deciding

how much medical

staff it needs, and therefore

cannot properly determine

the right size of

the medical force.

“Until DOD establishes

joint planning assumptions

for developing

medical and dental personnel

requirements, including

a definition, and

a method to assess options

for achieving joint

efficiencies, DoD will not

know whether it has the

optimal requirements to

achieve its missions,” the

report said.

The military departments

have applied separate

and different processes

and assumptions

to decide how many

medical staff are needed.

The report goes on to

state that DoD plans to

develop a uniform metric

for 72 medical specialties

to deal with the

issue, but those metrics

are not in place and

could be expensive to

implement.

DoD has yet to fully

budget for the implementation

of the metrics,

but GAO says they are

essential.

“Until DoD determines

the critical wartime

medical specialties to

apply its clinical readiness

metric and estimates

the costs and

benefits of applying the

metric to each, it will not

know if its implementation

is being targeted to

the areas of greatest return

on investment,” the

report said.

DoD agreed with six

recommendations set

out by GAO it rectify the

issue. The recommendations

include applying

joint planning assumptions

and methods when

determining the size of

the medical force and

estimating the cost and

benefits of using the DoD

metrics to decide if the

approach should be revised.


WWW.MHCE.US MHCE News 7

CORONAVIRUS ROBBING GRANDPARENTS

OF PRECIOUS TIME WITH FAMILIES

By Ethan Sacks

Instead of being able to throw a

party worthy of matriarch Barbara

Burr’s milestone birthday, the coronavirus

pandemic forced her family

to improvise.

The mother of nine, grandmother

of 22 and great-grandmother of 37

was instead whisked outside of her

home in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, on

April 18 — her 90th birthday — for a

surprise car parade in her honor.

“It is was extra special, out of this

world,” Burr said. “Only I felt so bad

when they all left and I couldn’t give

them all a hug.”Burr, who lives with

her 95-year-old husband, Gerald,

is hoping she will get a chance to

hold them all again in her arms. “It

could take years,” she said of what

she calls “this germ that’s floating

around,” adding that by then, “I’ll be

long gone.”

Even as stay-at-home protocols are

lifted across the country, health experts

are recommending that older

Americans stay indoors and avoid

contact with potential virus carriers

— including family members who

aren’t sheltering in place with them.

That means that until a vaccine is

readily available, grandparents will

lose precious time with their children

and grandchildren.

There is, of course, good reason for

all that social distancing: COVID-19

poses a disproportionate danger to

seniors. In New York, the hardest-hit

region in the country, 84.5 percent

of deaths attributed to the virus

were of people aged 60 or older,

according to the state’s health department.

“The relationship between grandparents

and grandkids are important

for mental health and emotional

health, as well physical health,” said

Alison Bryant, senior vice president

of research for AARP.

“You know grandparents just enjoy

it, but there are real health implications

of not being able to spend time

with grandkids.” In the absence

of regular physical contact, other

types of contact are key.

Bryant said family members can

make a big difference by using

phone calls and video chats to

maintain contact. Seeing the faces of

loved ones is important, preferably

with some kind of regular routine.

Amy Fuchs, owner of the Elder Expert

consulting service, has said

there is a marked difference in the

way seniors are handling the dislocation

caused by COVID-19 that

overlaps with their ages.

“What I find is that the younger cohort

(aged 60-75) is more adept at

social media and technology and

smartphones,” said Fuchs, a clinical

social worker. “So I’m a little less

worried about them, because they

have the ability to access Zoom or

other platforms to be in touch with

their families.”

For her clients over 80, particularly

those who live alone, however,

Fuchs is already seeing an increase

in memory issues weeks into the

forced isolation.

“They’ve lost the social interaction,

and you don’t realize how much

they gain from that,” said Fuchs.

“They live for the trips to the grocery

store. They live for the trips

to the pharmacy. They live for the

trips to the physical therapist.”

That isolation has been particularly

stark for seniors who have come

down with the coronavirus and

forced to battle for their lives in hospitals

or nursing homes, where family

members are barred from being

at their sides.

The last time Kristen Lathrop saw

her grandmother, Goldie Mae

Moran, was as Moran was being

whisked from an ambulance into

the emergency room of Hartford

Hospital in Connecticut. Because of

the highly contagious nature of the

disease, the staff did not allow Lathrop

to get too close.

“I kind of shouted across the room

to let her know that I was there,

because I didn’t know if she didn’t

have a phone,” recalled Lathrop, a

psychiatrist. “She was like, ‘Where

are you?’ And I just wanted her to

know I was there. I said, ‘I love you,’

and I just kind of knew that those

would be my last words to her.”

Her grandmother died days later, at

5:28 a.m. on her 88th birthday, with

a hospital staffer at her bedside to

hold up a phone for family members

to say goodbye.

“These are moments when you

want to hold someone’s hand and

look them in the eyes so they can

see your face to give them some closure,”

Lathrop said.

Seniors, however, do have one advantage

over their younger coun-

terparts in adjusting to this radical

new societal landscape — life experience.

“For a lot of older folks who havegone

through challenging situations

through their lives, they can

rely on skills they developed over

those previous experiences,” said

Dr. Ellen Whyte, director of geriatric

psychiatry outpatient services

at the University of Pittsburgh’s

Western Psychiatric Hospital.

And if there is another silver lining,

it’s that the proliferation of the

coronavirus has brought with it

a simultaneous spread in empathy.

The whole idea of “flattening

the curve” is based on the idea of

not getting someone else sick, especially

when the risks increase

with age.

Grocery stores across the country

are restricting access at specific

times, often early in the morning,

to allow seniors a chance to shop,

while social media is full of stories

of good Samaritans buying food

for their elderly neighbors.

“Now, people who are not senior

citizens are sort of experiencing

some of the isolation that many

senior citizens face day in and

day out,” Whyte said. “So hopefully

they’ll be more sensitive to that

isolation that can occur as people

get older and reach out more to

our older relatives, friends and

neighbors on a regular basis — not

just through this crisis, but going

forward.”

In Wisconsin, Burr’s family celebrated

the birth of her first greatgreat-grandson,

Royale, in March.

But while the nonagenarian has

already crocheted a blanket for

the newest addition to the Burr

clan, she can’t meet him in person

because of the lockdown.And

Crystal Burr, one of her 22 grandchildren,

worries that the family is

on a ticking clock.

“We all worry about the health of

my grandmother and grandfather,

and we worry if we’re going to

get the chance to hug them ever

again,” the younger Burr said.

“Their health is declining and it’s

heart-wrenching to think about.”

“Every day is a gift,” she added,

“but tomorrow is never a

promise.”


8

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

Don’t let Nurses Month Pass You By.

Here’s How to Celebrate Virtually.

HELP SLOW

THE SPREAD!

By Katherine Virkstis, ND, Managing

Director

It’s bittersweet to think about 2020

as the “Year of the Nurse.” The Covid-19

epidemic has forced nurses to

risk their personal safety to deliver

care—many in some of the most difficult

practice environments in living

memory. Yet there has been no finer

showcase of nursing excellence, fortitude,

compassion, and ingenuity than

the past four months.

Nurses Month celebrations to commemorate

the “Year of the Nurse” are

slated to begin May 6 and run through

the entire month of May.

While some organizations have postponed

their celebrations to protect

nurse and patient safety, I recommend

that all leaders use this month as an

opportunity to recognize and thank

nursing staff for their heroism.Below

are a few ideas I’ve collected for how

to celebrate your nursing workforce

safely:

Host a virtual awards ceremony.

Granting DAISY Awards or other recognition

of achievement is usually the

cornerstone of nursing celebrations.

Even if you decide to postpone an

in-person celebration, try to still host

a live (albeit virtual) event for your

honorees.

For example, some organizations are

hosting a virtual recognition dinner

with the full leadership team, with

dinner for two delivered to each of the

honorees’ homes.

Thank their families. Nurses’ families

have been making sacrifices throughout

the epidemic so their loved ones

can deliver care.

Show your appreciation by mailing a

thank-you note and a token of gratitude—for

example, a pizza-making kit.

Create spaces for nurses to share their

stories. Give nurses an opportunity to

recognize their peers by creating a

live forum to share their stories on the

front line.

If asking staff to join a meeting is too

time intensive, you can collect video

clips or photos in advance and compile

them in a video to be shared on

your organization’s website and

intranet.Ask the community to share

their thanks.

Nursing has rarely been as publicly recognized

as it is today. Give the community

the opportunity to share their thanks

with your staff.

You can ask your marketing department

to create a forum where the public can

share videos of themselves thanking

your organization’s nurses—which can

be compiled and shared throughout the

month. Another option is to encourage

community leaders to start a cloth face

mask drive for hospital staff.

Have executive leaders publicly express

their gratitude. Many organizations are

creating videos of the executive team

thanking nurses for their service. Other

options are to do a live panel session of

nurse leaders to share their stories, or

send a thank you note on behalf of nursing

leadership to each nurse’s home.

Offer a chance to connect with nursing

leadership. Nursing leaders can make

themselves personally available to staff,

as long as it meets hospital safety standards.

For example, one organization is

planning a “Latte with Leaders” event,

where staff can connect with nurse leaders

stationed by a free 24-hour coffee

cart.

Leverage community food donations.

Food, another staple of nursing celebrations,

has rarely been more plentiful as

local business across the country donate

meals to hospitals. Take advantage of this

generosity by doubling down on food-related

recognition.

Send meals to each unit, deliver dinner

to nurses at home, or designate each day

of the week to a different snack available

to nurses. Another option is to hire an ice

cream truck to visit different sites across

the system—managers can come pick up

treats for their team at staggered times to

avoid a crowd.

Keep the “blessing of the hands.” A “blessing

of a hands” ceremony can be a particularly

meaningful tradition for staff. It’s

also one of the most difficult to do virtually.

Even if your organization postpones

their in-person blessing, keep the spirit

of the ritual alive by having a chaplain

do a blessing virtually or via overhead

announcement. Another option is to give

staff bookmarks or other mementos with

the blessing inscribed.


WWW.MHCE.US MHCE News 9

Covid-19 Pandemic Likely to

Last Two Years, Report Says

By John Lauerman

The coronavirus pandemic is likely to last as long as two years

and won’t be controlled until about two-thirds of the world’s population

is immune, a group of experts said in a report.

Because of its ability to spread from people who don’t appear to

be ill, the virus may be harder to control than influenza, the cause

of most pandemics in recent history, according to the report

from the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the

University of Minnesota. People may actually be at their most

infectious before symptoms appear, according to the report.

After locking down billions of people around the world to minimize

its spread through countries, governments are now cautiously

allowing businesses and public places to reopen. Yet the

coronavirus pandemic is likely to continue in waves that could

last beyond 2022, the authors said.

“Risk communication messaging from government officials

should incorporate the concept that this pandemic will not be

over soon,” they said, “and that people need to be prepared for

possible periodic resurgences of disease over the next two years.”

Developers are rushing to make vaccines that may be available in

small quantities as early as this year. While large amounts of vaccine

against the 2009-2010 flu pandemic didn’t become available

until after the outbreak peaked in the U.S., one study has estimated

that the shots prevented as many as 1.5 million cases and 500

deaths in that country alone, the report said.

The report was written by CIDRAP director Michael Osterholm

and medical director Kristen Moore, Tulane University public

health historian John Barry, and Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist

at the Harvard School of Public Health.


10

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

AS UNEMPLOYMENT

SURGES, DEPARTMENT

OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

GOES ON HIRING SPREE

Veterans and service members speak with business representatives about job opportunities

at the Recruit Military Job Fair in San Diego on July 11, 2019. (Jake Mc-

Clung/U.S. Marine Corps)

Military.com | By Richard Sisk

Backed by a record $240 billion budget, the Department

of Veterans Affairs has gone on a hiring

spree to fill long-vacant spots as it battles coronavirus,

pulling from the ranks of the retired and

those furloughed or laid off by other health care

systems.

From March 29 to April 11, VA hired 3,183 new

staff, including 981 registered nurses, a 37.7% increase

from the prior two-week period, VA said

in an April 24 release.

In the next several weeks, the VA plans to add

4,500 more staff members, department secretary

Robert Wilkie said in a statement.

“Many of VA’s new hires come from health care

systems that have seen temporary layoffs due to

COVID-19,” VA officials said in the release.

As the number of coronavirus cases surged, the

VA began a national campaign to hire more registered

nurses, respiratory therapists, anesthesiologists,

housekeepers, supply technicians and other

medical personnel to work in its 170 hospitals

and more than 1,200 clinics nationwide.

The hires boosted the VA’s workforce to a record

390,000, or “nearly 55,000 more than we had five

years ago,” the VA spokeswoman said.

However, the 390,000 figure for the total VA workforce

was only 4,000 above the 386,000 number

reported at a hearing of the House Veterans Affairs

Committee in September 2019.

VA Inspector General Michael Missal testified at

the hearing that staffing shortages were “a root

cause for many of the problems in veterans care.”

In his statement to the committee last Sept. 18,

Missal said his office had reported on staffing

shortages at the VA for the previous four years.

He noted that the Veterans Health Administration

had made significant progress on hiring but said

it continues to face challenges, including the higher

pay offered by private health care systems.

As of Monday, the VA had reported a total of 434

coronavirus deaths of patients in the VA health

care system, and a total of 7,001 veterans in VA

medical care who had tested positive for the virus.


WWW.MHCE.US MHCE News 11


12

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

Our ‘Corona Project’

By VICTOR DAVIS HANSON

.Whatever we eventually call it, there is a

coronavirus “project.”

Chemotherapy

It’s a race to identify the origins, nature,

and danger of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and

the best way to treat, vaccinate against,

and mitigate the effects of the COVID-19

disease — all without destroying America

to save it.However the Corona Project

is defined, it remains different from all

previous existential American efforts.

We are not building any new weapon or

infrastructure or deliberately adopting a

radical new policy. Much less are

Americans fighting a visible enemy, poverty,

or just bad habits.

Instead, we are giving ourselves massive

social and economic chemotherapy

to weaken or retard the virus within us

before our massive therapeutic shutdown

kills the U.S. economy — a sort of neutron

bomb that destroys human interaction

without incinerating visible infrastructure.

In other words, we the patient apparently

must be sickened to the point of near death

in order to survive the disease.

It is certainly difficult to compare similar

American mass efforts in the past. Their

costs are murky — and not just because

of inadequate record keeping, the adjustment

of prior dollars to current time and

inflation, or the need to consider the relationship

between lives and money. In addition,

the tab for past “wars on” something

or other (e.g., alcohol, illiteracy, smoking,

poverty, drugs, etc.) usually rippled out for

years, both positively and negatively.

While there were efforts to mitigate the

1918 and 1957 flus and summer polio outbreaks,

along with smallpox, yellow fever,

typhoid, and cholera epidemics, we’ve

never seen anything comparable to the

reaction to the coronavirus. So it is hard

to calibrate the expense of the Corona

Project’s shuttering of the American

economy for what will probably turn

out to be a period of almost two months

and far longer in some places.

We are told that the Manhattan Project

cost in our present currency some $23

billion. Leave it to others whether that

“investment” saved or took more lives.

It certainly ended the war in the Pacific

without an invasion of Japan, spawned

peacetime nuclear energy, and created

deterrence in the Cold War that might

have prevented a Soviet invasion of

Western Europe.

The B-29 bomber program, which both

delivered the bomb and napalmed most

of the industrial output of Japan, cost almost

twice as much as the Manhattan

Project, at over $40 billion in today’s

dollars. The huge plane led to quantum

leaps in aircraft design. Without it,

the atomic bombs probably could not

have been dropped (The superb British

Avro Lancaster had the capacity to

carry such huge bombs but perhaps not

the speed or ceiling to ensure that the

bomber could be suitably distant after

dropping the weapon, or even had the

range to fly from and return to the Marianas).

NASA’s various space programs probably

have cost far more than the often

cited $1 trillion price. But going to the

moon likely more than paid for itself in

a variety of ways — in spin-off industries,

new technologies, invaluable scientific

data, and the emergence of a new sense

of increased national prestige.Critics of

the F-35 joint-strike fighter claim that it

will cost in toto over $1.5 trillion in all related

costs during its lifespan.

We have no idea how they can come up

with that number, only that the plane

is far more expensive than what was

initially promised. The interstate highway

system’s first phases probably cost

around $500 billion in today’s money

— and saved hundreds of thousands of

lives in its first few years.

World War II, aside from well over

400,00 American dead and the resulting

generations of disability and mental-health

issues, cost the U.S. in modern

currency over $4 trillion, despite turning

a lingering Depression-era economy

into a global juggernaut. No doubt the

actual related expense was trillions of

dollars higher.

Few have accurate figures on recent optional

wars. But general estimates put

the 19-year-long Afghanistan war at $2

trillion, and the 2003-08 active war in

Iraq at another $2 trillion — with more

than 7,000 American deaths in action

or related to both wars.No one has yet

calculated accurately the full cost of our

great gamble of shutting down most of a

$22 trillion economy.

To do so would spark heated controversy.

But we should at least agree that the

U.S. has never tried anything similar to

the present shutdown and that its costs

will exceed any project and likely any

war in our history. We are literally paying

an economic price comparable to

the costs of the Space Race, the Manhattan

Project, the interstate highway system,

and several wars several times over

all at once.

On the one side, supporters of the national

shelter-in-place policies would argue

that without these Draconian measures,

hundreds of thousands would have died

and that, even before government action,

many were already shutting down

the economy out of their natural fear and

precaution.

the other hand, critics suggest that

emerging herd immunity would eventually

have reduced that number of

deaths radically. In addition, as skeptics

such as scientists John Ioannidis and Jay

Bhattacharya of Stanford (among others)

have argued, we could see far more

people die from the neglect or delay of

treatments for critical diseases including

cardiovascular problems and cancer,

as well as from suicides, anxiety or

depression, increased substance abuse,

and spousal and familial violence. The

anthropogenic cost is about $3 trillion,

or $4 trillion, or $5 trillion — or is it now

$7 trillion? — in lost stock-market value,

federal borrowing, radical distortions in

consumer and government spending,

destroyed business infrastructure, and

lost GDP.

Whatever one’s views of the lockdown,

most will concede that shutting down

most of a postmodern-21st-century

economy incurs insidious costs not applicable

to previous quarantines or Manhattan-like

projects or large wars. The

decision to do so was, by needs, made

in haste to prevent what was forecast

as a true national pandemic that would

kill, we were initially told by some modelers,

up to 2.2 million Americans. That

horrific toll would have dwarfed even

the 500,000 to 800,000 who died in

the 1918–19 flu epidemic‚ and indeed far

more than all U.S. wars combined.

Other underappreciated factors explained

the panic surrounding the rapid

decision. The virus did not start in the

U.S. or “Spain” but in Communist China

— a totalitarian regime locked in an existential

trade war with the U.S. with a bad

record of spawning viruses. From the

very beginning, all news about the epidemic,

and indeed all policies directed

against it, were determined by the Communist

Party’s own self-interest — defined

as ensuring China’s unimpeded trajectory

to global hegemony.

Data were destroyed. Researchers were

silenced — or worse. News blackouts followed.

All information about the origins,

CONTINUE ON PAGE 13


WWW.MHCE.US MHCE News 13

CONTINUED

transmission rates, and scope of the pandemic

either was censored or massaged

to such a degree that the numbers and

dates changed weekly.

To this day, no one has any idea how

many Chinese citizens have died or

been infected from COVID-19. We will

never know. China’s Patient Zero supposedly

appeared in late January, or

was it mid-November? And who knows

when he will be reinvented next?

We still do not know the role of either the

Wuhan wet market or the level-4 viral

lab just a few miles from it. The Chinese

seem far more sensitive to charges that

lax safety standards in their sophisticated

postmodern laboratory sparked the

outbreak than to the writ that their premodern

butcher market was culpable.

In the end, it may prove that the latter

was a propagandized ruse for the real

culpability of the former.

That China locked down Wuhan and forbid

internal travel to and from Wuhan,

while allowing its quarantined residents

to fly directly into Europe and the U.S.

was the most telling of all Chinese outrages.

That fact alone should remind

those who cite xenophobia and racism

during this mess that they may be right

— but the perpetrators were always Chinese

racists, not American or European

ones.

The Causes of the Panic

We did not go through such hysteria in

2009 under the Obama administration

or in 2017 under Trump. Both were severe

flu years. The 2009 swine-flu outbreak

was scary in that it attacked all

ages and infected a supposed 60 million

Americans. The 2017 flu did too

but killed over three times as many, perhaps

more than 60,000. The flus of 1957

and 1968 respectively killed more than

100,000 Americans without national

lockdowns.

Why the difference in those responses

from today? 2020 is an election year.

Trump is hated, not just opposed, by the

media, Democrats, and the Never Trump

former Right. The longer the lockdown

and epidemic, the more his enemies

sense that the virus might do what neither

Mueller’s team nor impeachment

could.

The name “corona” is strange and not

familiar. Had the SARS-CoV-2 virus just

been wrongly labeled “Influenza C,” the

panic might have been less, regardless

of the actual costs in human lives or the

differences between an influenza and a

coronavirus. The virus itself seems especially

horrific in how it slowly strangles

and torments the elderly and the compromised.

So far, the coronavirus’s lethality rate

among those infected seems comparable

to the flu but it could also be more contagious.

So, in theory, we don’t yet know

whether its likely toll of 1 to 2 deaths per

1,000 infected will be rendered less relevant

— if 150 million Americans, not the

normal flu tally of 30–60 million cases,

become exposed and thus in theory

150,000 could still die. It seems unlikely

with the virus already peaking, but again

no one knows.

Corona is also fickle. It seems not to kill

99.9 percent of those infected who are

under 60 and in good health, but, very

rarely, it can kill someone hale and

young. And the virus does so in a cruel

fashion of mimicking a mild flu for days

only to trigger a hyper-immune response

that induces the body to kill itself.

Vigorous health-care workers on the

front lines are rewarded for their courage,

in Thucydidean fashion, with daily

blasts of heavy infectious loads that occasionally

can wear down the immunity of

even the youngest and healthiest.

Given the eternal nature of the news, we

are fed every gory detail about the 1 in

1,000 deaths, but we hear almost nothing

about the 999 healthy and under-60 corona

patients who suffer few or at least

tolerable symptoms. There is not yet anything

comparable to the hit-and-miss

influenza vaccination. Our media, to be

fair, is not just not fair and not sensationalized.

It’s politically weaponized, globalized,

and propagandized.

Partly media bias is due to the nature of

global bicoastal affluence and elitism (the

major media and their affiliated social

media and entertainment are centered in

the power foci of New York, Washington,

Los Angeles, and Silicon Valley). Partly,

the role of the influential and media-centric

New York corridor, where almost half

the country’s fatalities have occurred, explains

the asymmetrical coverage.

Partly, media incompetence, arrogance,

and partiality reflect the failure of journalism

programs and graduate schools

to teach writing skills, ethics, and professionalism.Partly,

the causes are the Internet,

emails, and social media that translate

unsourced hysterias into news to

win instant market share and clicks from

global thumbs-up/thumbs-down electronic

audiences.

Like it or not, unlike the Manhattan Project

or the B-29 program or the Space

Program or the War on Drugs or even the

earlier response to 1918–19, flu, the Corona

Project is seen as the determinant of

the next presidency as well as an adjudicator

of a growing factionalism last seen

in the pre–Civil War divide. In very general

terms, our polarization today pitts a

more globalized and affluent, progressive,

bicoastal nation against its more traditional,

populist, and nationalist interior

antithesis.

That is no exaggeration, given that almost

every decision of this crisis — keep or end

the lockdown, end shelter-in-place, borrow

and spend $3 trillion or $5 trillion,

use or don’t use hydroxychloroquine,

defund or increase funding for WHO — is

seen as either hurting or helping Donald

Trump or Joe Biden in November, and

by extension the sort of culture each has

come to represent. There is one difference,

however, from past experiences of

“the war on ______” and previous colossal

“Projects.”

The upbeat, can-do confidence evident

in earlier crises mostly either won public

support or at least public indifference

(which was seen as support). And there

were also clear goals: Build a big bomber

to ruin enemy industry, make a new

bomb to end the war immediately, tie

the country together with freeways,

reach the moon, stamp out drugs, poverty,

and smoking. The Corona Project

instead is ostensibly aimed at strangling

the virus and returning to normal

— except the architects of the project

offer no such confidence either in

medical or economic terms.

They pessimistically talk down to

us that the virus will always be with

us; that it will mutate into something

possibly worse; that we can, won’t,

or might gain herd immunity; that we

can’t go back to normal; that even antibodies

won’t provide immunity; that

it will take years to recover from the

economic damage; that the second

wave will be even worse; that there

may never be either a vaccine or a

successful remedy.

That constant mixed messages of

doom reflect past puzzlement about

everything important and trivial

connected to this virus — the rate of

human transmission, the efficacy of

masks and hand sanitizers, the use of

antimalarial drugs, the roles of political

agendas and cultural fault lines.

The only constant is that a reporter

or credentialed expert will authoritatively

assert a theory as a fact and

demonize those who disagree — only

to be proven wrong tomorrow. Then

he’ll forget his error, recalibrate, and

start over next week.

Such gloom, despair, and constant internal

bickering did not lead the U.S.

Army across the Rhine or put a man

on the moon.

And the current epidemic of pessimism

will not work with the current

Corona Project, either.


14

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

WANT TO

TAKE OUT A

AD?

SEND AN

EMAIL TO

CONTACT@

MHCE.US

FOR MORE

INFO.


15

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

Nurses Create Special

Message to Military

By: Chris DiMaria

TULSA, Okla. — As the 138th Fighter

Wing flew over a dozen Green Country

cities thanking medical workers, one

group of nurses at Saint Francis wanted

to send a thank you back. They did so

by crafting a giant mural the pilots overhead

couldn’t miss.

Amberly Wright is a Seven Tower nurse

at Saint Francis, who had never seen a

flyover in person before Thursday. Her

first was in her honor.“I can’t even believe

it,” Wright said.

“When I heard, I felt like crying a little,

because it was just amazing. And I was

just thinking we should do something

for them too because it’s a big deal to be

honored like that.”

To thank the military for their support,

Wright and eight others took to the top of

their parking lot, and drew a chalk mural that

spanned seven parking spaces.

For them, the day felt like Fourth of July came

early.

The mural atop took three dusty hours to finish,

using dozens of packs of chalk donated

by friends, family, and neighbors.

“It means so much to all of us, it really does,”

Eric Martin said.

“It’s a huge thing to have a flyover, usually that

only happens at the Super Bowl and things

like that, and to have a flyover over all the hospitals

in the area, our hearts are full.”

Martin says the team wanted to send a message

of thanks, and of unity. He says he wants

to support and honor the other healthcare


16

MHCE News

MAY 2020 EDITION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!