21.12.2012 Views

Chapter 11--Rosgen Geomorphic Channel Design

Chapter 11--Rosgen Geomorphic Channel Design

Chapter 11--Rosgen Geomorphic Channel Design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>11</strong><br />

Hydraulic relations<br />

Hydraulic relations are validated using resistance<br />

equations for velocity prediction at ungaged sites.<br />

(Stream Hydraulics is addressed in more detail in<br />

NEH654.06) Validation is accomplished by back calculating<br />

relative roughness (R/D 84 ) and a friction factor<br />

(u/u * ) from actual measured velocity for a range of<br />

streamflows including bankfull:<br />

⎡<br />

⎛ R ⎞ ⎤<br />

u = ⎢2.<br />

83 + 5. 66 log u<br />

⎝<br />

⎜ D ⎠<br />

⎟ ⎥ *<br />

⎣⎢<br />

84 ⎦⎥<br />

where:<br />

(eq. <strong>11</strong>–1)<br />

u = mean velocity (ft/s)<br />

R = hydraulic radius<br />

D = diameter of bed material of the 84th percentile<br />

84<br />

of riffles<br />

u * = shear velocity (gRS)½<br />

g = gravitational acceleration<br />

S = slope<br />

Measured velocity, slope, channel material, and hydraulic<br />

radius data from various Colorado rivers using<br />

this friction factor (u/u * ) and relative roughness<br />

(R/D 84 ) relation are shown in figure <strong>11</strong>–6 (<strong>Rosgen</strong>, Leopold,<br />

and Silvey 1998; <strong>Rosgen</strong> and Silvey 2005).<br />

Manning’s n (roughness coefficient) can also be<br />

back-calculated from measured velocity, slope, and<br />

hydraulic radius. Another approach to predict velocity<br />

at ungaged sites is to predict Manning’s n from a<br />

friction factor back-calculated from relative roughness<br />

shown in figure <strong>11</strong>–7 (<strong>Rosgen</strong>, Leopold, and Silvey<br />

1998; <strong>Rosgen</strong> and Silvey 2005). Manning’s n can also<br />

be estimated at the bankfull stage by stream type as<br />

shown in the relationship from gaged, large streams<br />

in figure <strong>11</strong>–8. Vegetative influence is also depicted in<br />

these data (<strong>Rosgen</strong> 1994).<br />

Dimensionless flow-duration curves—Flow-duration<br />

curves (based on mean daily discharge) are also<br />

obtained from gage stations then converted to dimensionless<br />

form using bankfull discharge as the normalization<br />

parameter (fig. <strong>11</strong>–9 (Emmett 1975)). The<br />

purpose of this form is to allow the user to extrapolate<br />

flow-duration curves to ungaged basins. This relationship<br />

is needed for the annual suspended and bed-load<br />

sediment yield calculation along with channel hydraulic<br />

variables.<br />

<strong>Rosgen</strong> <strong>Geomorphic</strong> <strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Design</strong><br />

<strong>11</strong>–12 (210–VI–NEH, August 2007)<br />

Part 654<br />

National Engineering Handbook<br />

(c) Phase III—Watershed and river<br />

assessment<br />

Land use history is a critical part of watershed assessment<br />

to understand the nature and extent of potential<br />

impacts to the water resources. Past erosional/depositional<br />

processes related to changes in vegetative cover,<br />

direct disturbance, and flow and sediment regime<br />

changes provide insight into the direction and detail<br />

for assessment procedures required for restoration.<br />

Time series of aerial photos are of particular value to<br />

understand the nature, direction, magnitude, and rate<br />

of change. This is very helpful, as it assists in assessing<br />

both short-term, as well as long-term river problems.<br />

Assessment of river stability and sediment<br />

supply<br />

River stability (equilibrium or quasi-equilibrium) is defined<br />

as the ability of a river, over time, in the present<br />

climate to transport the flows and sediment produced<br />

by its watershed in such a manner that the stream<br />

maintains its dimension, pattern, and profile without<br />

either aggrading or degrading (<strong>Rosgen</strong> 1994, 1996,<br />

2001d). A stream channel stability analysis is conducted<br />

along with riparian vegetation inventory, flow<br />

and sediment regime changes, limiting factor analysis<br />

compared to biological potential, sources/causes of<br />

instability, and adverse consequences to physical and<br />

biological function. Procedures for this assessment are<br />

described in detail by <strong>Rosgen</strong> (1996, 2001d) and in Watershed<br />

Assessment and River Stability for Sediment<br />

Supply (WARSSS) (<strong>Rosgen</strong> 1999, 2005).<br />

It is important to realize the difference between the<br />

dynamic nature of streams and natural adjustment<br />

processes compared to an acceleration of such adjustments.<br />

For example, bank erosion is a natural<br />

channel process; however, accelerated streambank<br />

erosion must be understood when the rate increases<br />

and creates a disequilibrium condition. Many stable<br />

rivers naturally adjust laterally, such as the “wandering”<br />

river. While it may meet certain local objectives to<br />

stabilize high risk banks, it would be inadvisable to try<br />

to “control” or “fix in place” such a river.<br />

In many instances, a braided river and/or anastomizing<br />

river type is the stable form. <strong>Design</strong>ing all stream<br />

systems to be a single-thread meandering stream may<br />

not properly represent the natural stable form. Valley<br />

types are a key part of river assessment to understand

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!