21.05.2020 Views

Broad Street Scientific Journal 2020

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

by touching the worms’ heads; paralysis was scored if the

worm did not move or only moved the head.

3. Results/Discussion

3.1 – Molecular Docking Studies

Molegro is a computational platform for predicting

protein-ligand interactions. In Molegro, the protein

2MXU was taken from the Protein Data Bank as a model

of Aβ fibril aggregation. 2MXU shows a fibril structure

composed of multiple peptide monomers. Two different

approaches were taken with this protein. One was of a

smaller fibril structure and the other of a dimer with a cavity

located between. Because the mechanism behind how

drugs like tetracycline work to dissolve the preformed fibril

is not currently known, both approaches were used.

With the fibril structure approach, the ligand bonds to the

outside of the fibril protein in a smaller cavity. With the

dimer structure approach, the ligand binds between the

two monomers (Fig. 2).

binding when more negative. Through using Molegro to

model the interactions between protein and ligand, it was

possible to find that in both the fibril and dimer formation,

CMTs repeatedly and consistently outperform tetracycline

and its natural analogs (Tab. 1).

Table 1. Molegro data table of binding affinities,

where more negative values are more effective, for

tetracycline and analogs with both the fibril (top)

and dimer (bottom) approaches.

Molecule Fibril binding affinity (avg.)

Tetracycline -9.69

Doxycycline -10.10

Minocycline -8.28

CMT-3 -14.43

CMT-1 -13.45

Molecule Dimer binding affinity (avg.)

Tetracycline -11.00

Doxycycline -12.33

Minocycline -9.37

CMT-3 -17.17

Among the CMTs themselves, however, there were

varied results. By testing different CMTs, it was possible

to find the more effective Aβ aggregation inhibitor to use

in further treatment. CMTs-1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were all

used (Fig. 3). Because the same trend was seen in both the

fibril and dimer approach, with CMTs outperforming tetracycline

and its natural analogs, the calculated binding

affinities were only compared for the fibril approach. The

compounds with the most effective binding affinities were

shown to be CMT-3, CMT-4, CMT-5, and CMT-7 (Tab.

2).

Figure 2. Molegro screencap of Aβ fibril protein

2MXU with tetracycline (green) integrated into both

fibril structures (top) and dimer structure (bottom).

When modeling the effectiveness of different ligands on

Aβ aggregation inhibition efficiency, tetracycline and its

analogs can be interpreted as effective through the analysis

of binding affinities. Binding affinities show more effective

Figure 3. Structures of CMTs (in order: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).

42 | 2019-2020 | Broad Street Scientific CHEMISTRY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!