Abur Ü, et al: CLLU1 Expression and FISH Aberrations in CLL Turk J Hematol 2018;35:61-65Table 4. Comparison of prognostic markers in the group with high CLLU1 expression with the findings of previous studies.Overall survival Need formedicationAdvanced stage High β2microglobulin levelFISHanomaliesAgeOur studyShorter(p>0.05)High(p>0.05)-(p>0.05)-(p>0.05)-(p>0.05)-(p>0.05)Buhl et al. [18]Shorter(p<0.05)High(p<0.05)+(p<0.05)NA +*(p<0.05)NAChen et al. [20] NA NA +(p<0.05)Josefsson et al.[11]Gonzalez et al.[19]Shorter(p<0.05)Shorter(p<0.05)High(p<0.05)-(p>0.05)(p>0.05) NA +(p<0.05)NA -(p>0.05)NA +*(p<0.05)-(p>0.05)NA-(p>0.05)+(p<0.05)*del11q22 and del17p group correlation.NA: Not available, FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization.There was no correlation between CLLU1 expression and FISHanomalies, β2 microglobulin and LDH levels, or MRS (p>0.05).DiscussionGenetic markers have been major factors in the prognosticevaluation of CLL. The chromosomal anomaly detection rate withFISH is 70%-80% [3]. In our study, the FISH abnormality ratewas 62%. Detected abnormalities include del13q14 (40%-60%),trisomy 12 (15%-20%), del11q22 (10%-20%), and del17p13(5%-10%). Our study yielded a similar pattern. Survival wassignificantly shorter among patients with del11q12 and del17p13.Similar to the literature data, significant correlation was observedbetween these two deletions and poor prognosis [5,6,12]. In thisstudy, patients with positive 14q32 rearrangements also had pooroutcomes, as shown in some previous reports [13,14].Few studies refer to homozygote del13q14, and its contributionto prognosis is unclear. Some have reported that homozygotedel13q14 is associated with an advanced stage [15,16], whilePuiggros et al. [17] noted the opposite. In our study, homozygotedel13q14 was correlated with advanced stage and shortersurvival.Previous studies reported that TP53, NOTCH, SF3B1, and BIRC3mutations are accountable for poor prognosis [7,8]. The impactof CLLU1 expression as a new prognostic factor in CLL is unclear.In the present report, high CLLU1 expression indicated shortersurvival and higher need for treatment. Similar results wereobserved in the literature [11,18,19].In our study, there was no correlation between CLLU1 expressionand FISH aberrations. Some have reported that patients withdel17p13 and del11q22 have significantly higher levels of CLLU1[11,18]. Chen et al. [20] noted the opposite. Buhl et al. [21] reportedno increase in the level of CLLU1 in patients with trisomy 12;Gonzalez et al. [19] noted the opposite. There was no correlationbetween trisomy 12 and CLLU1 expression in our study (Table 4).Figure 1. Levels of CLLU1 expression: a, b, d, g- patients; c-standard; e, f- healthy controls.ConclusionA chromosomal evaluation is still needed for the geneticevaluation of CLL because it can identify unique translocationsor aberrations in which breakpoints could lead to identificationof new molecular markers. Application of a FISH panel includingprobes aiming to detect homozygous del13q14, del11q22,del17p, 14q32 rearrangements, and trisomy 12 should still bethe routine. The impact of testing CLLU1 expression is not yetclear and there is a need for more relevant data.EthicsEthics Committee Approval: This study had the permissionof the Ondokuz Mayıs University Ethical Committee (approvalnumber: 201/855).Informed Consent: It was received.Authorship ContributionsSurgical and Medical Practices: G.O., M.T., D.Ö.; Concept: G.O.,D.Ö., M.T.; Design: Ü.A., Ö.S.A., H.S.A.; Data Collection orProcessing: Ü.A., E.A., Ö.S.A.; Analysis or Interpretation: Ü.A., E.A.;Literature Search: Ü.A., H.S.A., E.A., Ö.S.A.; Writing: G.O., Ü.A.64
Turk J Hematol 2018;35:61-65Abur Ü, et al: CLLU1 Expression and FISH Aberrations in CLLConflict of Interest: The authors of this paper have no conflicts ofinterest, including specific financial interests, relationships, and/oraffiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials included.References1. Gentile M, Mauro FR, Guarini A, Foà R. New developments in the diagnosis,prognosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Opin Oncol2005;17:597-604.2. Byrd JC, Stilgenbauer S, Flinn IW. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2004;163-183.3. Dicker F, Schnittger S, Haferlach T, Kern W, Schoch C. Immunostimulatoryoligonucleotide-induced metaphase cytogenetics detectchromosomal aberrations in 80% of CLL patients: a study of 132 CLLcases with correlation to FISH, IgVH status, and CD38 expression. Blood2006;108:3152-3160.4. Shanafelt TD, Geyer SM, Kay NE. Prognosis at diagnosis: integratingmolecular biologic insights into clinical practice for patients with CLL.Blood 2004;103:1202-1210.5. Lai YY, Huang XJ. Cytogenetic characteristics of B cell chronic lymphocyticleukemia in 275 Chinese patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization: amulticenter study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:2417-2422.6. Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, Leupolt E, Kröber A, Bullinger L,Döhner K, Bentz M, Lichter P. Genomic aberrations and survival in chroniclymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1910-1916.7. Puiggros A, Blanco G, Espinet B. Genetic abnormalities in chroniclymphocytic leukemia: where we are and where we go. Biomed Res Int2014;2014:435983.8. Stilgenbauer S, Schnaiter A, Paschka P, Zenz T, Rossi M, Döhner K, Bühler A,Böttcher S, Ritgen M, Kneba M, Winkler D, Tausch E, Hoth P, Edelmann J,Mertens D, Bullinger L, Bergmann M, Kless S, Mack S, Jäger U, Patten N, WuL, Wenger MK, Fingerle-Rowson G, Lichter P, Cazzola M, Wendtner CM, FinkAM, Fischer K, Busch R, Hallek M, Döhner H. Gene mutations and treatmentoutcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the CLL8 trial. Blood2014:123:3247-3254.9. Buhl AM, James DF, Neuberg D, Jain S, Rassenti LZ, Kipps TJ. Analysis ofCLLU1 expression levels before and after therapy in patients with chroniclymphocytic leukemia. Eur J Haematol 2011;86:405-411.10. Schoch C, Schnittger S, Bursch S, Gerstner D, Hochhaus A, Berger U,Hehlmann R, Hiddemann W, Haferlach T. Comparison of chromosomebanding analysis, interphase and hypermetaphase-FISH, qualitative andquantitative PCR for diagnosis and for follow-up in chronic myeloidleukemia: a study on 350 cases. Leukemia 2002;16:53-59.11. Josefsson P, Geisler CH, Leffers H, Petersen JH, Andersen MK, Jurlander J,Buhl AM. CLLU1 expression analysis adds prognostic information to riskprediction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2007;109:4973-4979.12. Ripollés L, Ortega M, Ortuño F, González A, Losada J, Ojanguren J, Soler JA,Bergua J, Coll MD, Caballín MR. Genetic abnormalities and clinical outcomein chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2006;171:57-64.13. Pittman S, Catovsky D. Prognostic significance of chromosome abnormalitiesin chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 1984;58:649-660.14. Cavazzini F, Hernandez JA, Gozzetti A, Russo Rossi A, De Angeli C, Tiseo R,Bardi A, Tammiso E, Crupi R, Lenoci MP, Forconi F, Lauria F, Marasca R, MaffeiR, Torelli G, Gonzalez M, Martin-Jimenez P, Maria Hernandez J, Rigolin GM,Cuneo A. Chromosome 14q32 translocations involving the immunoglobulinheavy chain locus in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia identify a diseasesubset with poor prognosis. Br J Haematol 2008;142:529-537.15. Stilgenbauer S, Sander S, Bullinger L, Benner A, Leupolt E, Winkler D, KröberA, Kienle D, Lichter P, Döhner H. Clonal evolution in chronic lymphocyticleukemia: acquisition of high-risk genomic aberrations associated withunmutated VH, resistance to therapy, and short survival. Haematologica2007;92:1242-1245.16. Shanafelt TD, Witzig TE, Fink SR, Jenkins RB, Paternoster SF, Smoley SA,Stockero KJ, Nast DM, Flynn HC, Tschumper RC, Geyer S, Zent CS, Call TG,Jelinek DF, Kay NE, Dewald GW. Prospective evaluation of clonal evolutionduring long-term follow-up of patients with untreated early-stage chroniclymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4634-4641.17. Puiggros A, Delgado J, Rodriguez-Vicente A, Collado R, Aventín A, LuñoE, Grau J, Hernandez JÁ, Marugán I, Ardanaz M, González T, Valiente A,Osma M, Calasanz MJ, Sanzo C, Carrió A, Ortega M, Santacruz R, AbrisquetaP, Abella E, Bosch F, Carbonell F, Solé F, Hernández JM, Espinet B; GrupoCooperativo Español de Citogenética Hematológica (GCECGH) and GrupoEspañol de Leucemia Linfática Crónica (GELLC). Biallelic losses of 13q do notconfer a poorer outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: analysis of 627patients with isolated 13q deletion. Br J Haematol 2013;163:47-54.18. Buhl AM, Jurlander J, Geisler CH, Pedersen LB, Andersen MK, Josefsson P,Petersen JH, Leffers H. CLLU1 expression levels predict time to initiationof therapy and overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Eur JHaematol 2006;76:455-464.19. Gonzalez D, Else M, Wren D, Usai M, Buhl AM, Parker A, Oscier D, Morgan G,Catovsky D. CLLU1 expression has prognostic value in chronic lymphocyticleukemia after first-line therapy in younger patients and in those withmutated IGHV genes. Haematologica 2013;98:274-278.20. Chen L, Li J, Zheng W, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Li L, Qian S, Xu W. The prognosticevaluation of CLLU1 expression levels in 50 Chinese patients with chroniclymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2007;48:1785-1792.21. Buhl AM, Jurlander J, Jørgensen FS, Ottesen AM, Cowland JB, GjerdrumLM, Hansen BV, Leffers H. Identification of a gene on chromosome12q22 uniquely overexpressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood2006;107:2904-2911.65
- Page 1:
Volume 35 Issue 1 March 2018 80 TLI
- Page 4 and 5:
Contact InformationEditorial Corres
- Page 6 and 7:
TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGYINSTRU
- Page 8 and 9:
subject may be posited. Do not publ
- Page 10 and 11:
the questions. You may copy and pas
- Page 12 and 13:
Images in Hematology71 Ascites in t
- Page 14 and 15:
Gamaletsou MN, et al: Antifungal-Re
- Page 16 and 17:
Gamaletsou MN, et al: Antifungal-Re
- Page 18 and 19:
Gamaletsou MN, et al: Antifungal-Re
- Page 20 and 21:
Gamaletsou MN, et al: Antifungal-Re
- Page 22 and 23:
Gamaletsou MN, et al: Antifungal-Re
- Page 24 and 25:
RESEARCH ARTICLEDOI: 10.4274/tjh.20
- Page 26 and 27: Aydınok Y, et al: A National Regis
- Page 28 and 29: Aydınok Y, et al: A National Regis
- Page 30 and 31: Aydınok Y, et al: A National Regis
- Page 32 and 33: Genitsari S, et al: MSCs in Childho
- Page 34 and 35: Genitsari S, et al: MSCs in Childho
- Page 36 and 37: Genitsari S, et al: MSCs in Childho
- Page 38 and 39: Genitsari S, et al: MSCs in Childho
- Page 40 and 41: Tüfekçi Ö, et al: Juvenile Myelo
- Page 42 and 43: Tüfekçi Ö, et al: Juvenile Myelo
- Page 44 and 45: Tüfekçi Ö, et al: Juvenile Myelo
- Page 46 and 47: Tüfekçi Ö, et al: Juvenile Myelo
- Page 48 and 49: Vural S, et al: Transformation of M
- Page 50 and 51: Vural S, et al: Transformation of M
- Page 52 and 53: Vural S, et al: Transformation of M
- Page 54 and 55: RESEARCH ARTICLEDOI: 10.4274/tjh.20
- Page 56 and 57: Nikkhah H, et al: BM-MSCs’ Effect
- Page 58 and 59: Nikkhah H, et al: BM-MSCs’ Effect
- Page 60 and 61: Nikkhah H, et al: BM-MSCs’ Effect
- Page 62 and 63: Kumar D, et al: NPM1 Mutation Analy
- Page 64 and 65: Kumar D, et al: NPM1 Mutation Analy
- Page 66 and 67: RESEARCH ARTICLEDOI: 10.4274/tjh.20
- Page 68 and 69: Özen M, et al: ABO Blood Group and
- Page 70 and 71: Özen M, et al: ABO Blood Group and
- Page 72 and 73: Özen M, et al: ABO Blood Group and
- Page 74 and 75: Abur Ü, et al: CLLU1 Expression an
- Page 78 and 79: BRIEF REPORTDOI: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0
- Page 80 and 81: Annayev A, et al: Kidney Functions
- Page 82 and 83: Annayev A, et al: Kidney Functions
- Page 84 and 85: Debski J, et al: Plasma Cell Myelom
- Page 86 and 87: Singh C, et al: Pachymeningeal Invo
- Page 88 and 89: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 90 and 91: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 92 and 93: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 94 and 95: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 96 and 97: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 98 and 99: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 100 and 101: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 102 and 103: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 104 and 105: LETTERS TO THE EDITORTurk J Hematol
- Page 106: Advisory Board of This Issue (March