29.07.2020 Views

GROUND 0101 (The Fall Issue)

GROUND volume one, issue one Edited by Ismael Ogando (November 5th, 2015) http://ground-magazine.com/0101

GROUND volume one, issue one
Edited by Ismael Ogando (November 5th, 2015)
http://ground-magazine.com/0101

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

education, arts and artistry, gender, age,

and physical dis/ability, these films articulate

further the tensions and dialectics

involved in the power dynamics and ethical

encounters circulating around and

through the networks of work.

Lee and Leong also engage with

their concern for social justice issues

and situations through a number of films

dealing directly with recognized regimes

and attendant political structures. Their

first film, Passabe, is the story of a border

town between Timor-Leste and Indonesia.

The town is scarred by its past as

the site of paramilitary massacres during

East Timor’s fight to become an independent

nation. Here, the political place and

social position of storytellers and testimony

become central to finding a way

to engage with community tension and

identity. How and why we tell stories matters

very much to our collectivity. Wukan:

The Flame of Democracy (2013) explores

unlikely populist challenges to staid—

and corrupt—political structures through

the story of a 2011 uprising in a fishing

village in southern China. Along the way

of reporting on the direct challenges, the

film also begins to address questions of

what happens after an uprising, after the

confrontation—when the difficult work of

solidarity and governance begins again.

Focusing on Hong Kong, two other

films also fit this connection between

visible political struggle and story telling.

Muzzling the Messenger (2015) asks after

the state of the press since the city

state returned to centralized control by

Beijing in 1997. Hong Kong’s world press

transparency ratings were once the highest

in Asia; since the turn of the century

they have been steadily falling. For six

intense months in 2014, central Hong

Kong was the site of one of the most interesting

and complex protests in Asia.

Hong Kong: Occupy Central (2015) is a

three-part documentary of the “Umbrella

Movement,” its working strategies and

arrangements, its antagonisms and frustrations,

and its overall attempt to alter

the political landscape—to make Hong

Kong politics under Beijing as transparent

and openly democratic as possible. The

reunion of Hong Kong with the People’s

Republic of China was officially touted as

a move toward, “one country, two systems,”

where the “special administrative

district” would have allowances made for

its differences—historical, social, economic—from

the rest of the nation. Following

a central-party decision to alter

Hong Kong’s election process—a reform

seen by many as a restriction on electoral

autonomy and transparency—two

groups began to work to challenge the

state apparatus. A group of academics

and a group of students confronted the

system from different directions, not always

agreeing on practices nor demands.

Overall, though, they held referendums,

meetings, demonstrations, and, eventually,

occupied the central business district

of the city. The protests were noted

locally and internationally for their nonviolent

and environmentally aware tactics.

They also became known as the “Yellow

Umbrella Revolution” when, in response

to police teargas, protestors stood their

ground using their ubiquitous umbrellas

as shields. While the immediate effects

of the demonstrations remain uncertain,

this documentary shows the complexities

of working for change from within larger

social structures as well as on the edges

of those structures. The government

agrees to meetings, but there seems little

change in official positions. While most

of the protests and reactions remain civil;

the police do assault the student leader.

How many counter protest are legitimate

remains ambiguous. In the end, the

film focuses on the difficulties of activist

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!