04.08.2020 Views

Tradewinds August 2020 Web Final

August 2020 Edition of the Albemarle tradewinds

August 2020 Edition of the Albemarle tradewinds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HRNeptune.com<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

This Day in History: Colorado, 1876, & the Electoral College<br />

On this day in 1876, Colorado is admitted to the<br />

Union as the 38th state. America was then<br />

celebrating its 100th birthday, which is why Colorado<br />

is known as the Centennial state.<br />

Maine and Nebraska currently reject the winnertake-all<br />

allocation of electors used by the rest of<br />

the country. Instead, those two states allocate their<br />

electors by congressional district.<br />

by: Tara Ross<br />

Did you know that Colorado chose not to conduct a<br />

presidential election in 1876?<br />

The new state was looking at a tight timeline. It was<br />

admitted into the Union only three months before the<br />

presidential election. It would have been logistically<br />

difficult and fairly expensive to hold a statewide<br />

popular vote that year.<br />

So the state simply didn’t do it. The legislature directly<br />

appointed electors instead.<br />

In 1836, Virginia refused to accept the Democratic<br />

nominee for Vice President. Richard M. Johnson<br />

of Kentucky was controversial because he’d been<br />

living with one of his slaves. Virginians were horrified<br />

and chose electors pledged to William Smith of<br />

Alabama instead.<br />

In 1892, some states did not include Grover Cleveland<br />

on their ballots. In 1948, some states rejected<br />

Harry S. Truman. In 1860, ten southern states<br />

refused to list Abraham Lincoln.<br />

The move sounds surprising to modern ears, but<br />

early Americans knew something that today’s voters<br />

have forgotten: Our unique presidential election<br />

system gives states flexibility to look out for the best<br />

interests of their own citizens. No national, centralized<br />

force drives presidential elections: States are in<br />

charge.<br />

Importantly, this power resides in the hands of state<br />

legislatures, not their Governors. “Each State shall<br />

appoint,” the Constitution provides, “in such Manner<br />

as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of<br />

Electors . . . .”<br />

Historically, state legislatures have taken this<br />

responsibility seriously, and they’ve acted independently<br />

in ways that are largely unexpected today.<br />

Consider what happened in Wyoming, which<br />

became a state in 1890. Two years later, that state<br />

hosted a presidential election in which women were<br />

allowed to vote. Wyoming didn’t lobby other states,<br />

asking for permission. It simply acted in accordance<br />

with Wyoming’s needs and preferences.<br />

The state had a pragmatic—and perhaps humorous—reason<br />

for its decision. It needed to attract<br />

more women to the frontier!<br />

Other states have displayed their independence in<br />

other ways.<br />

Massachusetts once had a system in which the state<br />

legislature would select electors if no one received<br />

a majority of the state’s popular vote. Meanwhile,<br />

At least reportedly, some states gave Teddy Roosevelt’s<br />

electors freedom to vote as they thought<br />

best in a three-man race in 1912. If Roosevelt was<br />

undermining William Taft’s chances of defeating<br />

Woodrow Wilson, then they were supposed to vote<br />

for Taft instead.<br />

Obviously, state independence doesn’t suggest that<br />

states will always act with perfect motives. “If men<br />

were angels,” James Madison famously wrote, “no<br />

government would be necessary.” However, the<br />

decentralized system reflects perhaps the most<br />

fundamental cornerstone of our Constitution: checks<br />

and balances. Such safeguards ensure that a variety<br />

of voices are heard.<br />

In recent years, we’ve strayed from the Founders’<br />

decentralized, state-by-state approach to presidential<br />

elections. Instead, national media, national<br />

polling agencies, and the national political parties<br />

dictate much of what happens.<br />

We are straying from the Founders’ design and<br />

simultaneously becoming more angry and divided.<br />

Perhaps that’s no coincidence.<br />

To order Tara’s books, go to this link:<br />

http://www.taraross.com/books/<br />

Tara Ross is a mother, wife, writer, and retired lawyer. She is<br />

the author of The Indispensable Electoral College: How the<br />

Founders’ Plan Saves Our Country from Mob Rule,Enlightened<br />

Democracy: The Case for the Electoral College, co-author of<br />

Under God: George Washington and the Question of Church<br />

and State (with Joseph C. Smith, Jr.), & We Elect A President:<br />

The Story of our Electoral College. She is a constitutionalist, but<br />

with a definite libertarian streak! Stay tuned here for updates on<br />

pretty much anything to do with the Electoral College, George<br />

Washington, & our wonderfully rich American heritage.<br />

28 Albemarle <strong>Tradewinds</strong> <strong>August</strong> <strong>2020</strong> albemarletradewinds.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!