22.12.2012 Views

TREATMENT OF OSGOOD-SCHLATTER DISEASE WITH DRILL ...

TREATMENT OF OSGOOD-SCHLATTER DISEASE WITH DRILL ...

TREATMENT OF OSGOOD-SCHLATTER DISEASE WITH DRILL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>TREATMENT</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>OSGOOD</strong>-<strong>SCHLATTER</strong> <strong>DISEASE</strong> <strong>WITH</strong> <strong>DRILL</strong><br />

CHANNELS *<br />

BY E. J. BOZSAN, M.D., AND THOMAS J. O’KANE, M.D.,<br />

NEW YORK, N. Y.<br />

From. the Division of Skeletal Surgery, Morrisania City Hospital, New York<br />

It is well known that a large majority of cases of Osgood-Schiatter<br />

disease either require no treatment whatever or respond favorably to<br />

conservat ive measures. However, the opinion is expressed frequently<br />

that. there is a certain, if very small, percentage of cases that call for some<br />

form of operative treatment. Operations ranging from the simple bone-<br />

splitting incision1 to bone grafting2 and removal of the diseased areas3<br />

have been devised.<br />

The present-day conception of the disease, as it has become differen-<br />

tiated since the original publications of Osgood4 and Schlatter5, separates<br />

the traumatic avulsion of the tibial tubercle and the cases of bone formation<br />

in the patella tendon, lat.er described, from this distinctly chronic<br />

process.<br />

Irrespective of the etiological relationship of the two groups, we are<br />

at. this time concerned only with the chronic cases, not manifestly trau-<br />

matic, which correspond to those described by Schiatter and those<br />

classified as Group 2 in the description of Osgood.<br />

Following the line of thought that prompted one of us to recommend<br />

drill channels for treatment of the Legg-Calv&Perthes disease and of<br />

intracapsular fractures of the neck of the femur6, we have applied this<br />

simple procedure to cases of Osgood-Schiatter disease, with the expectation<br />

that the fresh blood supply conducted to the diseased areas of bone would<br />

improve the condition,-that is, facilitate and so hasten the process of<br />

natural repair.<br />

The technique is simple. A small incision or stab wound is made over<br />

the affected t.ibial tubercie and one or two channels are drilled through<br />

the diseased area, indicated on the roentgenogram, into the cancellous<br />

upper end of the tibia. Immobilization in plaster-of-Paris seems un-<br />

necessary. Patients are allowed to walk as soon as they are able to<br />

do so without pain. -<br />

During the year 1932, six cases have been treated in this manner with<br />

gratifyingly prompt results. The clinical symptoms have subsided<br />

within three or four weeks and complete bony restoration has been<br />

demonstrable by x-ray examination as early as seven weeks after opera-<br />

tion. During this time pain and swelling have disappeared; the patients<br />

have regained their confidence in the extremity; and have been able to<br />

bear weight in a squatting position.<br />

* Read before the Clinical Society of the Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York<br />

February 7, 1933.<br />

290


<strong>OSGOOD</strong>-<strong>SCHLATTER</strong> <strong>DISEASE</strong><br />

LJ<br />

WH<br />

“<br />

;,<br />

291<br />

o. - . -<br />

-I.<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1.<br />

H


292 E. J. BOZSAN AN!) T. J. 0 KANE<br />

(.‘ASE HISTORIES<br />

CASE 1 (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). 13. S., girl, eleven years of age (No. 29529), was admitted<br />

to the hospital January 13, 1932. Symptoms of pain and tenderness had been present<br />

for six months. Roent.genogram taken the following day (Fig. 1 ) revealed the tubercle<br />

fragmented and considerably absorbed. Drilling operation was performed on February<br />

I , 1932. On withdrawal of the (trill, a large (lrop of mucilaginous material issue(1 out of<br />

the hole un(ler some l)resstlre. Cultures of this and hone chips were negative. Due<br />

to the fact that this patient had to he placed in a plaster spica on account of a coexisting<br />

process in the hip joint, the earliest postoperative roentgenogram could not be taken<br />

until<br />

-<br />

May 7, 1932 (Fig. 2 . This<br />

A<br />

indicated<br />

r<br />

complete restoration of the tibial tubercle,<br />

and a follow-up picture July 5,<br />

1932, (Fig. 3) showed tip fused<br />

. with main l)ody of the tibia.<br />

CASE 2 (Figs. 4, 5, 6, and<br />

7). E. Q., boy, aged fifteen<br />

years (No. 28026), had been<br />

treated in the Out-Patient<br />

Department since the fall of<br />

1931. Symptoms had been<br />

present vi Ith varying intensity<br />

for the last fourteen months.<br />

Roentgenogram December 7,<br />

1931, (Fig. 4) showed the tubercle<br />

fragmented and its tip absorbed.<br />

Patient refused opera-<br />

t.ion but returned in the spring<br />

of 1932 on account of exacerha-<br />

t.ion of symptoms. X-ray (Fig.<br />

5) April 26, 1932, revealed iden-<br />

tical condition as four and one-<br />

half months before. Drilling<br />

operation was done on May 6,<br />

1932, and the limb immobilized<br />

for two weeks. Patient was<br />

discharged May 30, 1932.<br />

When he reported to the clinic<br />

about eight. weeks after 1eration,<br />

July 1, 1932, the roentgenogram<br />

(Fig. 6) revealed the<br />

previously absorbed tip of the<br />

FIG. 4 tibial tubercle restored. All<br />

clinical symptoms were absent<br />

Case 2. Roent.genogram taken December 7, 1931.<br />

Tihial tubercle fragmented and tip absorbed. and the patient had full use of<br />

the limb. He did not report<br />

again until March 20, 1933, on which occasion the x-ray (Fig. 7) revealed complete resto-<br />

ration of the tihial t.iibercle and union of the small fragments with the main body of the<br />

tuhercle, with only a small hiatus indicating the upper border of the small fragment. He<br />

was completely free of symptoms.<br />

CASE 3 (Figs. 8, 9, 10, and 11). J. R., boy, fourteen years old (No. 31847). Symptoms<br />

had been present for five months previous to admission. X-ray September 8, 1932,<br />

revealed the tip of the right tihial t.uhercle absorbed. Operation was performed September<br />

19, 1932, and patient was discharged two days after operation with plaster-of-Paris<br />

bandage which he wore for a period of two weeks. About eight weeks after operation


<strong>OSGOOD</strong>-<strong>SCHLATTER</strong> <strong>DISEASE</strong> 293<br />

L<br />

4.<br />

I-<br />

-.,7<br />

i .<br />

. -<br />

.<br />

12<br />

C..


294 li. J. BOZSAN AND T. J. O’KANE<br />

FIG. S FIG. 9<br />

Case 3. Roentgeiiogram taken Septenhl)er<br />

5, 1932. Tip of t uherele<br />

ahsorhed.<br />

Case 3. Roentgenogram taken December<br />

3, 1932. Complete restoration.<br />

j<br />

Case 3. Roentgenogram taken November<br />

1, 1932, six weeks after operation.<br />

New hone fornmtion beginning.<br />

FIG. 11<br />

Case 3. Roentgenogram taken January<br />

12, 1933. Complete restoration,<br />

firm union.


FIG. 12<br />

Case 4. Hxentgenogram taken October<br />

14, 1932. Fragmentation and<br />

absorption of the tubercie.<br />

FIG. 14<br />

Case 5. Rnentgenogram taken December<br />

10, 1932. Tubercle fragmented<br />

and considerably absorbed.<br />

<strong>OSGOOD</strong>-<strong>SCHLATTER</strong> <strong>DISEASE</strong> 29s<br />

FIG. 13<br />

Case 4. Roentgenogram taken December<br />

1, 1932, seven weeks after operation.<br />

Complete restorat ion.<br />

FIG. 15<br />

Case 5. Roentgenogram taken February<br />

25, 1933, ten weeks after operation.<br />

Fragments united. Size of tubercle<br />

considerably increased.


296 E. J. BOZSAN AND T. J. O’KANE<br />

FIG. 16 FIG. 17<br />

Case 6. It()entgenogranl taken’De- Ca.se 6. Roentgenogram taken Febcember<br />

10, 1932. Tuberele fragmented ruary 25, 1933, ten weeks after operaaII(I<br />

rarefied. tion. Fragments united and size of<br />

tibial tubercle considerably increased.<br />

the boy viItS entirely free from clinical symptoms. Roentgenogram November 1, 1932<br />

(Fig. 9 revealed bone formation at the site of the previously absorbed tip and apposition<br />

of new bone over the body of the tuhercie. X-ray on December 3, 1932 ( Fig. 10) showed<br />

tibial tubercle totally restored, as did another (Fig. 1 1 ) taken January 12, 1933.<br />

CASE 4 (Figs. 12 and 13). \V. P., boy, thirteen years of age (No. 32670), had had<br />

symptoms for eight months. Roentgenogram (Fig. 12) taken on October 14, 1932<br />

revealed fragmentation and absorption of right tihial tuhercle. Operation was done on<br />

October 15, 1932, and patient. was discharged October 17, 1932, without application of<br />

plaster-of-Paris. On December 1, 1932, patient was free of all symptoms, and an x-ray<br />

(Fig. 13) at this time, seven weeks after operation, revealed complete bony restoration<br />

of the tibial tubercle.<br />

CAsE 5 (Figs. 14 and 15). .J. 5., boy fifteen years old (No. 34838). Symptoms<br />

had been present on 1)0th sides for eight. months. X-ray (Fig. 14) December 10, 1932,<br />

revealed diffuse absorption of the right tibia! tuhercle and a fracture at its base. Operation<br />

was performed on December 19, 1932, and patient was discharged December 21, 1932,<br />

without any immobilization. On February 25, 1933, the patient was free of symptoms,<br />

and roent.genogram (Fig. 15) taken at this time revealed bony formation, increasing the<br />

size of the tibia! tul)ercle, and union of fracture line.<br />

CASE 6 (Figs. 16 and 17). Same patient as Case 5. X-ray (Fig. 16) December 10,<br />

1932, revealed left tibial tubercie fragmented. Operation was done the same day as<br />

that on the right. side. When seen on February 25, 1933, the patient was free of symptoms.<br />

Roentgenogram at this time (Fig. 17) revealed considerable restoration of the<br />

outline of the tibia! tubercle and disappearance of the fragment.<br />

It is difficult to decide when to consider conservative measures in-<br />

adequate. The intensity of symptoms, the ensuing disability, and the


<strong>OSGOOD</strong>-<strong>SCHLATTER</strong> <strong>DISEASE</strong> 297<br />

period of recovery vary so widely that it seems futile to try to establish an<br />

average picture of the disease. Schlatter’s observation that the older the<br />

child, the better are the chances of spontaneous recovery is of little help<br />

in the great number of cases between the ages of eleven and fourteen.<br />

Osgood speaks of “severe handicap and long continued serious annoy-<br />

ance “, Schlatter of “recurrent attacks of pain over a long period of time”.<br />

Campbell7 mentions instances in which one or more years elapse before<br />

the symptoms entirely subside.<br />

We wish to emphasize that these are the cases, and these only, for<br />

which this simple operative procedure is recommended.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. JONES, SIR ROBERT, AND LovFrrr, R. W.: Orthopedic Surgery. Ed. 2. New York,<br />

William Wood and Co., p. 36, 1929.<br />

2. BOSWORTH, DAVID M.: Avulsion of the Tibia! Tubercle (Osgood-Schlatter) Treated<br />

by Fixation of the Tubercie with Bone Pegs. Section of Orthopedic Surgery, New<br />

York Academy of Medicine, Dec. 16, 1932.<br />

3. CorroN, F. J.: Fractures. In Dean Lewis’ Practice of Surgery. Hagerstown, Md.,<br />

W. F. Prior Co., Inc., Vol. II, Chap. 4, p. 127, 1927.<br />

4. <strong>OSGOOD</strong>, R. B.: Lesions of the Tibial Tubercle Occurring During Adolescence.<br />

Boston Med. and Surg. J., CXLVIII, 114, 1903.<br />

5. SCRLATFER, CARL: Verletzungen des SchnabelfOrmigen Fortsatzes der Oberen<br />

Tibiaepiphyse. Bruns’ Beitr. z. KIm. Chir., XXXVIII, 874, 1903.<br />

6. BOZSAN, E. J.: A New Treatment of Intracapsular Fractures of the Neck of the Femur<br />

and Calv#{233}-Legg-Perthes Disease. J. Bone and Joint Surg., XIV, 884, Oct. 1932.<br />

A New Treatment of Intracapsular Fractures of the Neck of the<br />

Femur and Legg-Calv#{233}-Perthes Disease. Technique. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,<br />

XVI, 75, Jan. 1934.<br />

7. CAMPBELL, WILLIS C.: A Text-Book on Orthopedic Surgery. Philadelphia, W. B.<br />

Saunders Co., p. 165, 1930.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!