16.11.2020 Views

16-11-2020 The Asian Independent

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 16-11-2020 to 30-11-2020 HEALTH

www.theasianindependent.co.uk

How Covid-19 may severely affect our offsprings

Exposure to virus could pose risk to the health and ageing of individuals who aren’t even born yet, reveals study

New York : Scientists have claimed

that by the end of 2020, approximately

3,00,000 infants could be born to mothers

infected by SARS-CoV-2, the virus

that causes Covid-19.

The study, published in the Journal

of Developmental Origins of Health and

Diseases, revealed that exposure to

Covid-19 could pose a risk to the health

and ageing of individuals who aren’t

even born yet. “Millions more will be

born into families who have experienced

tremendous stress and upheaval

due to the pandemic even if they haven’t

been infected themselves,” said the

study authors from University of

Southern California (USC) in the US.

While the longer-term effects of

Covid-19 on infants is yet to be seen,

researchers can find some insight from

the past, including the 1918 flu pandemic

and previous coronavirus illnesses

such as SARS in 2002 and MERS in

2012. “The 1918 influenza pandemic

had long-term impacts on the cohort

exposed in utero, which experienced

earlier adult mortality and more diabetes,

ischemic heart disease and

depression after age 50,” said study

author Caleb Finch from USC.

“It is possible that the Covid-19 pandemic

will also have long-term impacts

on the cohort that was in utero during

the pandemic, from exposure to maternal

infection and/or the stress of the

pandemic environment,” Finch added

Maternal viral infections can affect

fetuses through multiple pathways,

from direct transmission through the

placenta to inflammatory responses that

disturb in-utero metabolism and negatively

affect growth.

While direct maternal-fetal transmission

of the virus and severe birth defects

appear to have been rare during previous

coronavirus outbreaks, there were

increases in preterm delivery and low

birth weight during both the 2002 SARS

and 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreaks,

which are possible consequences of

increased inflammation.

While studies on Covid-19 and pregnancy

are still in their early stages, there

have already been some concerning

results that merit a closer look in ongoing

studies, the authors wrote.

Increased rates of preterm birth may

be linked to maternal SARS-CoV-2

infections, and other studies indicate

that severe illness is correlated with a

higher risk of stillbirth.

Other potential dangers, including

the increased risk of blood clots presented

by both pregnancy and severe

Covid-19, also need further study.

“We suggest that to capture the consequences

of viral exposure in utero for

childhood development and adult

health, Covid-19 birth cohort studies

consider the immediate collection of

data from the mother, fetus, neonate,

and placenta,” the team noted.

World's top intensive care body

advises against fremdesiviror

sickest COVID PATIENTS

* Advice on remdesivir follows WHO trial results *

Dexamethasone recommended for COVID patients, not plasma

Brussels : Antiviral remdesivir

should not be used as a routine

treatment for COVID-19 patients

in critical care wards, the head of

one of the world's top bodies representing

intensive care doctors

said, in a blow to the drug developed

by U.S. firm Gilead.

Remdesivir, also known as

Veklury, and steroid dexamethasone

are the only drugs authorised

to treat COVID-19 patients across

the world. But the largest study on

remdesivir's efficacy, run by the

World Health Organization

(WHO), showed on Oct. 15 it had

little or no impact, contradicting

previous trials. In light of the new interim

data from the WHO's Solidarity trial "remdesivir

is now classified as a drug you should

not use routinely in COVID-19 patients," the

President of the European Society of

Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), Jozef

Kesecioglu, said in an interview with

Reuters. Kesecioglu said the recommendation

would be discussed in a scientific paper

on COVID therapies that ESICM is preparing

with the Society of Critical Care

Medicine, another intensive care body,

expected to be published by January. The

first version of the paper, released in March,

said there was not enough information to recommend

the use of remdesivir and other

antivirals in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Gilead, which has questioned the WHO's

findings, said in an emailed statement: "We

are confident that doctors on the front lines

recognise the clinical benefit of Veklury

based on robust evidence from multiple randomized,

controlled studies." ESICM represents

thousands of anaesthesiologists, respiratory

physicians, nurses and other critical

care professionals in more than 120 countries.

While doctors and hospitals are not

obliged to follow its advice, its recommendation

could curb the use of remdesivir.

At the end of October, Gilead cut its 2020

revenue forecast, citing lower-than-expected

demand and difficulty in predicting sales of

remdesivir.

WIDELY USED : The drug remains,

however, widely used in hospitals. It is

authorised or approved for use in more than

50 countries and was one of the medicines

administered to U.S. President Donald

Trump when he tested positive for coronavirus

in October.

The European Union signed a 1-billioneuro

($1.2 billion)deal with Gilead for

500,000 courses of remdesivir at 2,070 euros

each, days before the Solidarity results. The

deal does not oblige European countries to

buy remdesivir, but governments decided to

place large orders even after the Solidarity

results, with Germany buying a big stock in

November, saying the drug was useful, especially

early in the course of the disease.

Kesecioglu said there was not enough data

available about when remdesivir might be

effective or for which patients,

leading to the decision to discourage

its routine use in intensive

care. This means doctors should

use remdesivir only occasionally,

and not as a standard treatment for

COVID-19 patients.

Because of remdesivir's unclear

benefits, the critical care department

at the University Medical

Center of Utrecht in the

Netherlands, where Kesecioglu

works, has not used it to treat

COVID-19 patients, he said.

SIDE-EFFECTS

Ten months into the pandemic,

a debate continues to rage in the

medical industry about which drugs are best

to treat hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

Remdesivir has potential side-effects on

the kidneys, according to data shared by

Gilead with the European Medicines

Agency, which is assessing its possible toxicity

Arnaud Hot, head of medicine at Edouard

Herriot hospital in Lyon, France, told

Reuters that some patients at his hospital had

experienced kidney injury and so it was no

longer using remdesivir, except in rare cases.

Kesecioglu said convalescent plasma,

which is also experimentally administered to

some COVID-19 patients despite not having

been approved, was also not recommended

by ESICM for routine intensive care use, as

its benefits were unclear.

He added the potential side-effects of

convalescent plasma - the liquid part of

blood extracted from COVID-19 patients -

were also not clear

In contrast, Kesecioglu said dexamethasone

was recommended for use in hospitalised

patients because there was sufficient

information on its efficacy.

Air pollution may up chronic

lung disease in young adulthood

London : Amid the spike in air pollution in Delhi-NCR, a new

study has found that early-life events, such as the exposure to air pollutants,

increase the risk of chronic lung disease in young adulthood.

The findings, published in the European Respiratory Journal, add

to the growing evidence that chronic lung disease in adulthood can be

traced back to childhood. Chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease (COPD), with the hallmark features phlegm and

irreversible airflow limitation, respectively, are lung diseases known

to affect adults with a history of long-term smoking.

"We found the prevalence of chronic bronchitis and irreversible

airflow limitation to be rather high considering the young age of the

study participants." said study senior author Erik Melen from

Karolinska Institutet in Sweden.

"Those diseases are usually diagnosed in patients older than 50

years of age," the researchers wrote.

In the present studies, the researchers used data from birth up to

age 24 years from the follow-up of the Swedish population-based

birth cohort 'BAMSE', which includes 4,089 participants from the

Stockholm area recruited 1994-96.

Analyses performed by the research team showed that smoking,

as well as early-life air pollution exposures and childhood asthma,

are risk factors for chronic bronchitis, whereas breastfeeding was

identified as a protective factor.

In addition, the early-life risk factors for the development of irreversible

airflow limitation were recurrent lung infections, asthma,

and exposure to air pollution.

"The levels of air pollutants in the current study mainly reflect

local emissions from road traffic, which implies that this preventable

risk factor may play an important role in the development of chronic

lung disease in young adults," the authors wrote.

Given that air pollution levels in Stockholm are comparatively

low by international standards, this makes the current findings very

important in a global context.

And despite the young participants' age, active smoking was

linked to chronic bronchitis, which underlines the negative health

effects from even a limited period of exposure to tobacco smoke.

"In conclusion, our two novel studies demonstrate that chronic

bronchitis and irreversible airflow limitation do exist in young adults

and emphasize the importance of early-life events for maintaining

lung health during adulthood," the study authors noted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!