January-February - Air Defense Artillery
January-February - Air Defense Artillery
January-February - Air Defense Artillery
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
19.-13 A HOLE FILLER 51<br />
Figure 3<br />
:'Jaturally the fourth reason merits no consideration<br />
whatever.<br />
Now everybody knows that we've been getting too<br />
much dispersion. Battery commanders have been<br />
known to converge their guns at about the midpoint<br />
of a target practice course to pick up more hits. Of<br />
course this makes a very sour divergence under service<br />
conditions if a target comes through at an azimuth different<br />
bv 3200 mils from the azimuth<br />
are conv~rged.<br />
at which we<br />
The Navy beats the rap by having the director compute<br />
parallax separately for each gun. We have no<br />
such scheme standardized,<br />
See Figure 2.<br />
but look what we can do!<br />
We set a gun do-wn on the directing point of the battery.<br />
This becomes the base piece. We put the other<br />
three guns down radially about thirty-five yards away<br />
from the base piece about 120 0<br />
)<br />
.apart. Now let's count<br />
our gains.<br />
1. 'VIle set in director displacement from the base<br />
piece and leave it. If we get to shoot trial fire, 'we shoot<br />
J<br />
it ",,'ith this gun and have corrections for the battery<br />
without manipulation,<br />
1. \Ve have a pattern that can be concealed more<br />
readily than even a rough square (or have we?).<br />
3. If we have a secondarv antimechanized mission,<br />
and embark on it, we can ~lways shoot at least three<br />
guns without blasting another crew or two. In a square,<br />
sometimes only two guns will be able to fire.<br />
4. Any discussion of reduced dispersion 'would get<br />
into dispersion ladders, twenty-five per cent rectangles,<br />
and even twelve and one-half per cent boxes or dispersion<br />
volumes of some sort to get the relative battery<br />
probable errors of the two layouts. We might presume<br />
that the average values of developed armament probable<br />
errors in our antiaircraft artillery gun batteries are proportional,<br />
in elevation, in deflection, and along the trajectory,<br />
to those given in the firing tables, within certain<br />
limits of accuracy. Anyhow, the witnessing of several<br />
dozen calibration problems and a comparable number<br />
of trial fire shots coupled with a small amount of<br />
shooting at sleeves indicates that our guns consistently<br />
shoot within :(. :(. :(.mils of the place where we think<br />
we are pointing them. If by some chance everything<br />
works out right using a square formation, we are consequently<br />
missing the target by about :(.:(.:(.mils at mid<br />
range, and shooting all around it. We've left a great big<br />
hole right in the center of the pattern of bursts! By putting<br />
one gun in the middle \ve can pretty \vell fill up<br />
this hole with a lot of concussion and fast moving<br />
fragments.<br />
If we pull the three guns in radially so that they are<br />
twentv or twenty-five yards from the center, we will fill<br />
the hO'lefor sure: We ~hould also get some sort of centcr<br />
of burst in the sky that will show us how we're doing.<br />
"Please cancel my husband's subscription to the JOURNAL. He has<br />
gone on active service and won't need it any longer."<br />
"l\1y son has gone on foreign service, so please cancel his sub-<br />
... "<br />
scnptIOn.<br />
Believe it or not, these are actual quotations from l~tters received<br />
at the JOURNAL office. Perhaps the reason you may not be receiving<br />
your JOURNAL is outlined in these quotations. Remember, the<br />
JOURNAL can reach you at any pla~ that is served by a United States<br />
Post Office, or an Army Post Office.<br />
PROPERTY OF U. S.