Blue Chip Issue 78 - Jan 2021
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ETHICS<br />
How conflicted<br />
are professional<br />
FINANCIAL PLANNERS?<br />
Appreciating the psychological factors that lie behind conflicts of interest<br />
When asked, financial planners believe they are objective and impartial<br />
during the advice-giving process and are seldom aware of how frequently<br />
their self-interests conflict with acting in the best interests of their clients.<br />
However, literature and research on the psychology of conflicts of<br />
interest (COIs) highlight that we are regularly conflicted in our daily activities and our<br />
brains need to work hard to avoid conflicts that may negatively impact on the interests of<br />
others. Most financial planners tend to think of COIs in terms of the disclosure requirements<br />
found in the FAIS General Code of Conduct and the FPI Code of Ethics and Professional<br />
Standards. However, many planners do not fully appreciate the underlying psychological<br />
factors behind COIs that are often subtle but hugely influential on their attitude and<br />
decision-making, as well as the awareness necessary to minimise the negative effects of<br />
giving clients biased advice.<br />
COIs fall within the realm of moral standards and decision-making and are loosely<br />
defined as a clash between the proper exercise of professional judgement and personal<br />
A conflict only<br />
becomes unethical<br />
when it negatively<br />
influences the<br />
professional judgement<br />
of a financial planner<br />
and damages the<br />
interests of a client.<br />
62 www.bluechipdigital.co.za